Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > Electronic Harassment / Mind Control / Subliminal Programing

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 27-05-2018, 02:23 AM   #21
deca
Senior Member
 
deca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 18,803
Likes: 917 (609 Posts)
Default

Potential Risks to Human Health from Future Sub-MM Communication Systems: Paul Ben-Ishai, PhD
__________________
It would also appear possible to create high fidelity speech in the human body, raising the possibility of covert suggestion and psychological direction...Thus, it may be possible to 'talk' to selected adversaries in a fashion that would be most disturbing to them."
United States Air Force Scientific Advisory Board, New World Vistas: Air and Space Power For The 21st Century
find out more website ==> https://decasfoxhole.wordpress.com/
deca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2018, 02:24 AM   #22
deca
Senior Member
 
deca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 18,803
Likes: 917 (609 Posts)
Default

Cellular and Molecular Effects of Electromagnetic Fields, by Dr. Martin Blank
__________________
It would also appear possible to create high fidelity speech in the human body, raising the possibility of covert suggestion and psychological direction...Thus, it may be possible to 'talk' to selected adversaries in a fashion that would be most disturbing to them."
United States Air Force Scientific Advisory Board, New World Vistas: Air and Space Power For The 21st Century
find out more website ==> https://decasfoxhole.wordpress.com/
Likes: (2)
deca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2018, 03:31 AM   #23
deca
Senior Member
 
deca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 18,803
Likes: 917 (609 Posts)
Default

the video says it all ...
FCC CHAIRMAN ON '5G:' WE WON'T STUDY IT, REGULATE IT, HAVE STANDARDS FOR IT; IGNORES HEALTH ?'s
__________________
It would also appear possible to create high fidelity speech in the human body, raising the possibility of covert suggestion and psychological direction...Thus, it may be possible to 'talk' to selected adversaries in a fashion that would be most disturbing to them."
United States Air Force Scientific Advisory Board, New World Vistas: Air and Space Power For The 21st Century
find out more website ==> https://decasfoxhole.wordpress.com/
Likes: (1)
deca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2018, 09:54 AM   #24
truegroup
Senior Member
 
truegroup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Apollo Happened. Snap out of your dreamworld.
Posts: 15,881
Likes: 1,093 (855 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by deca View Post
Potential Risks to Human Health from Future Sub-MM Communication Systems: Paul Ben-Ishai, PhD
Thanks for this. It's opened up a whole new series of papers to wade through and I am seeing some possibility for disrupting humans through the sweat glands. I also had my question about water answered, whereby protons can jump around within the sweat glands themselves.

Link from video:
https://ehtrust.org/science/key-scie...n-human-health

My question to anyone reading this and rightfully concerned, is what are you going to do about it?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Windley
Never underestimate the power of the Internet to lend unwarranted credibility to the colossally misinformed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sts60
The funny thing is that such credophiles see themselves as sharp-eyed piercers of the veil, too sophisticated to be taken in by fakery. But they fall for almost anything that feeds into their convictions.
An analysis of Apollo Landing Sites. Debunk: To expose the falseness or hollowness of an idea or belief.
truegroup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2018, 09:58 AM   #25
tinfoil hat
Senior Member
 
tinfoil hat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 986 (544 Posts)
Default

Arent the creators of it bothered by the side affects then?
World wide isn't it?
__________________
Its O.K to be white.

Fellow European people, switch off the TV, get in shape and rekindle your heritage.
Civilisation is domestication.

Permaculture.
Become self sufficient.
tinfoil hat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2018, 01:50 PM   #26
polyhedron
Premier Subscribers
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,172
Likes: 856 (572 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by deca View Post
Potential Risks to Human Health from Future Sub-MM Communication Systems: Paul Ben-Ishai, PhD
I have watched this video so far, as well as the 9 minute video of the chairman of the fcc, who clearly exhibits all of the traits found in the Hare test for determining psychopathology within a person. A very dangerous individual he is.

But back to the above video. It should be pointed out that when microwaves strike a body, as in a microwave oven, for example, the waves do not convert directly into heat energy. First there is the absorbtion which results in the resonation of that body particulate that approximates to the same size or a derivative of that wave length.

It is important to realise that a body can absorb frequencies at a quarter wave length of its own core resonant frequency, as well as other fractions. This can be demonstrated using a Helmoltz resonator.

Upon absorption, an electromagnetic frequency below that of light, will cause ionization activity within the absorber, that is to say electrons are moved along an antena back and forth at the rate of the frequency and this will generate an alternating current voltage. So an ionization effect is resulted in, contrary to truegroup’s claim that radiowaves are non ionizing.

Now, this oscilating electrical energy has to go somewhere, or do something, and what it does is that among other things, it causes a mechanical vibration to occure within the particulate, at the same frequency as the radio wave.

I would suggest that it is this vibration, no longer in electromagnetic form which dissipates throughout further reaches of the body that the initial electromagnetic wave could not reach. And the speed of propagation of this vibration is much slower than the speed of light, in fact, it is more around the speed of sound through a liquid.

Being that the sonic propagation is slower than light, the wave form must be correspongly smaller. Much smaller and therefore results in wave sizes equaling that of the dimensions of the dna itself, which it can resonate and fracture, resulting in dysfunctioning cells, which can become cancerous. The fracturing of these smaller particulates then results in molecular vibrations which resonate in the infra red spectrum and thence forth we now have heat, which in turn cooks our dinner.

That is the process by which a microwave oven cooks peoples dinner. You are better off cooking your dinner in a normal oven, where such plastification of the food does not take place.

5g is worse than a microwave oven because the electromagnetic energy cannot disperse and so it is concentrated at the first layers of cells.
polyhedron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2018, 02:05 PM   #27
deca
Senior Member
 
deca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 18,803
Likes: 917 (609 Posts)
Default

look there are thermal effects ...which the safety guides are based on ....more energy ...more damage ....heating/burning "cooking"

these are recognized


then there are Non-thermal Biological Effects which are far more complex and more about frequency and modulation than raw energy ... these are not recognized

these are not recognized and there is no safety level/check in place here
__________________
It would also appear possible to create high fidelity speech in the human body, raising the possibility of covert suggestion and psychological direction...Thus, it may be possible to 'talk' to selected adversaries in a fashion that would be most disturbing to them."
United States Air Force Scientific Advisory Board, New World Vistas: Air and Space Power For The 21st Century
find out more website ==> https://decasfoxhole.wordpress.com/
deca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2018, 02:36 PM   #28
polyhedron
Premier Subscribers
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,172
Likes: 856 (572 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by deca View Post
look there are thermal effects ...which the safety guides are based on ....more energy ...more damage ....heating/burning "cooking"

these are recognized


then there are Non-thermal Biological Effects which are far more complex and more about frequency and modulation than raw energy ... these are not recognized

these are not recognized and there is no safety level/check in place here
This is very true. People have been deliberately made ignorant and told to rely only on official sources as a guide.

No one today knows radio theory, for example. There used to be a time when radio theory was almost common knowledge, but such enthusiasts have since grown old and died. The population today consists of no one with such knowledge unless it is within a tightly controled sphere of specialised knowledge.

So the factory workers in China will be clueless about 5g because they have no readio theory, and will not have heard of Maxwells equations. They will not understand accoustics, nor biology. In short we live in a mass of ignorance, and psychopathy ranging from the common disruptive neighbour in every street to the official, to banking executives, all the way to the chairman of the fcc.

So it looks like we don’t have very long to live. Possibly a couple of years but not much more.
polyhedron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2018, 02:41 PM   #29
polyhedron
Premier Subscribers
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,172
Likes: 856 (572 Posts)
Default

Now someone asked about the significance of water in relation to 5g transmissions. I mentioned that plants contained 90% water and animals 75%. Water absorbs microwave radiation. So for instance, if one considers a volume of animal matter with a comparible volume of water one will find that water is a more effective absorber of microwave radiation that animal matter, in the sense that microwaves will penetrate animal matter further than water.
polyhedron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2018, 03:04 PM   #30
polyhedron
Premier Subscribers
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,172
Likes: 856 (572 Posts)
Default

As for what one can do about 5g, I suppose the only thing one can do is ask every person one comes across whether or not they think 5g is harmful, and hear what they say. One could then ask, “well how do yo know it is safe?”

They will reply that there is no way they’d put something out that wasn’t safe. Well, one has to then find another question to ask. Or perhaps tell them that the fcc hasn’t tested it for safety.

Then there is the idea that each local transmitter is only 25mw in strength. Well, is that quiescent or nominal? Is it a peak or an rms value?

Do they know what “quiescent” means? How about rms? They will shy away from math, so telling them rms is root mean squared isn’t going to help. So we need some way of effectively communicating to people that their lack of knowledge is severe.

We take it for granted that people understand these technical terms and abreviation. So telling them 5g is dangerous requires them to act in faith.

Well as truegroup points out repeatedly, people won’t believe anything unless it has the official stamp of aproval and has been varified on TV. For most people, what is not on TV is not true, and everything on TV is the ultimate truth.

It’s not going to be possible to get through to people anything contrary to what’s on TV. But one can still ask them if they think 5g is safe.

“Is 5g safe?”
“yes.”
“how do you know?”
“it says so on TV.”
“what does it say on TV that convinces you its safe?”
“It can only be recieved by an antena.”
“How do you know that is true?”
“It says so on TV.”
“Is everything on TV true?”
“yes”
“Do you believe the official story of 9/11?”
“yes.”
“Do you question anything?”
“No.”
“why?”
“I can’t be bothered.”
“why?”
“Go away.”

At that point one just moves onto the next person and starts again.
polyhedron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2018, 03:50 PM   #31
truegroup
Senior Member
 
truegroup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Apollo Happened. Snap out of your dreamworld.
Posts: 15,881
Likes: 1,093 (855 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by polyhedron View Post
Upon absorption, an electromagnetic frequency below that of light, will cause ionization activity within the absorber, that is to say electrons are moved along an antena back and forth at the rate of the frequency and this will generate an alternating current voltage. So an ionization effect is resulted in, contrary to truegroup’s claim that radiowaves are non ionizing.

An excitation effect occurs. My statement was quite correct....

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-ionizing_radiation

"The energy of particles of non-ionizing radiation is low, and instead of producing charged ions when passing through matter, non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation has only sufficient energy to change the rotational, vibrational or electronic valence configurations of molecules and atoms"
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Windley
Never underestimate the power of the Internet to lend unwarranted credibility to the colossally misinformed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sts60
The funny thing is that such credophiles see themselves as sharp-eyed piercers of the veil, too sophisticated to be taken in by fakery. But they fall for almost anything that feeds into their convictions.
An analysis of Apollo Landing Sites. Debunk: To expose the falseness or hollowness of an idea or belief.
truegroup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2018, 06:37 PM   #32
polyhedron
Premier Subscribers
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,172
Likes: 856 (572 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by truegroup View Post
An excitation effect occurs. My statement was quite correct....

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-ionizing_radiation

"The energy of particles of non-ionizing radiation is low, and instead of producing charged ions when passing through matter, non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation has only sufficient energy to change the rotational, vibrational or electronic valence configurations of molecules and atoms"
Ah yes, my error, you were indeed quite correct.

But,do you think we’re all doomed, or am I over reacting? There may indeed be nothing to worry about. We have had so many false flags, starting with y2k where a lot of panic was generated over that. Many a boy has cried wolf only for non to avail.

Every new development has its neigh sayers. This 5g may be a very good thing, in which case nothing needs to be done about it. On the other hand, the attitude of the chairman of the fcc is somewhat suspicious. He wants it rolled out as fast as possible with no tests to determine its safety.

It’s no good on the other hand going out there with the wrong information. One needs to have the right information in order to tell people the truth. There is no point in needlessly scaremongering, that will only make the world even more dangerous.

One need only speak out if it’s dangerous.

Certainly there is a lot of money in it for the fcc and the comms industry as a whole, they certainly wouldn’t want their money pot threatened by people refusing it on the grounds that it is dangerous.

Max Igan does appear to be a sincere enough bloke, would he really go out of his way to spread lies? He surely believes it’s dangerous. Then there is David Icke who often speaks of the dangers of 5g.

Even the chairman of the fcc is claiming that 5g will enable connectivity to everything including plant matter. One is left in limbo really, not being a hundred percent certain of whether all these proclaimed dangers are real or imaginary.
Likes: (1)
polyhedron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2018, 07:55 PM   #33
truegroup
Senior Member
 
truegroup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Apollo Happened. Snap out of your dreamworld.
Posts: 15,881
Likes: 1,093 (855 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by polyhedron View Post
Ah yes, my error, you were indeed quite correct.

But,do you think we’re all doomed, or am I over reacting? There may indeed be nothing to worry about. We have had so many false flags, starting with y2k where a lot of panic was generated over that. Many a boy has cried wolf only for non to avail.

Every new development has its neigh sayers. This 5g may be a very good thing, in which case nothing needs to be done about it. On the other hand, the attitude of the chairman of the fcc is somewhat suspicious. He wants it rolled out as fast as possible with no tests to determine its safety.

It’s no good on the other hand going out there with the wrong information. One needs to have the right information in order to tell people the truth. There is no point in needlessly scaremongering, that will only make the world even more dangerous.

One need only speak out if it’s dangerous.

Certainly there is a lot of money in it for the fcc and the comms industry as a whole, they certainly wouldn’t want their money pot threatened by people refusing it on the grounds that it is dangerous.

Max Igan does appear to be a sincere enough bloke, would he really go out of his way to spread lies? He surely believes it’s dangerous. Then there is David Icke who often speaks of the dangers of 5g.

Even the chairman of the fcc is claiming that 5g will enable connectivity to everything including plant matter. One is left in limbo really, not being a hundred percent certain of whether all these proclaimed dangers are real or imaginary.
People know that I don't tend to be convinced of things without evidence. So my position is this.....I am concerned enough to expect significant testing, research and rigidly enforced regulations. Though it is not this deadly culling thing.

I still don't see how they will get this off the ground.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Windley
Never underestimate the power of the Internet to lend unwarranted credibility to the colossally misinformed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sts60
The funny thing is that such credophiles see themselves as sharp-eyed piercers of the veil, too sophisticated to be taken in by fakery. But they fall for almost anything that feeds into their convictions.
An analysis of Apollo Landing Sites. Debunk: To expose the falseness or hollowness of an idea or belief.
truegroup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2018, 01:02 AM   #34
deca
Senior Member
 
deca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 18,803
Likes: 917 (609 Posts)
Default

5G RECKLESS POLLINATOR ANNIHILATION


Quote:
POLLINATORS ANNIHILATED WITH THE RECKLESS UNLAWFUL ROLL OUT OF SECRET TELECOMS ATTACHED TO CANCER CAUSING LED STREETLIGHTS.
__________________
It would also appear possible to create high fidelity speech in the human body, raising the possibility of covert suggestion and psychological direction...Thus, it may be possible to 'talk' to selected adversaries in a fashion that would be most disturbing to them."
United States Air Force Scientific Advisory Board, New World Vistas: Air and Space Power For The 21st Century
find out more website ==> https://decasfoxhole.wordpress.com/
deca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2018, 03:41 PM   #35
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 24,120
Likes: 12,576 (7,192 Posts)
Default

nice work deca

__________________
I want a country i can be proud of
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2018, 05:22 PM   #36
deca
Senior Member
 
deca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 18,803
Likes: 917 (609 Posts)
Default

5G KILLING THE TREES


Quote:
THE DANGEROUS LEVELS OF EXPERIMENTAL UNINSURABLE UNLAWFUL RADIAITON DAMAGING LEAF GROWTH AT THE START OF THE SUMMER
__________________
It would also appear possible to create high fidelity speech in the human body, raising the possibility of covert suggestion and psychological direction...Thus, it may be possible to 'talk' to selected adversaries in a fashion that would be most disturbing to them."
United States Air Force Scientific Advisory Board, New World Vistas: Air and Space Power For The 21st Century
find out more website ==> https://decasfoxhole.wordpress.com/
deca is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:45 PM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.