Is the moon really a spaceship?

[derekbuttery]

Originally Posted by grandmasterp

OP, the clue is in the name.
The moon is 'a moon'.
Not a spaceship.
Hope that helps.

and the Sun is a star. So why hasn't the moon got a name like all the other 'moons' in the solar system?

[truegroup]

Originally Posted by derekbuttery

so you own the forum?

It wasn't even your point

The suggestion was made that I was attempting to pick up my "crusade", I made it quite clear that MY wish was not to debate on this thread. I OWN my opinion. Got any more sharp eyed comments

[truegroup]

Originally Posted by derekbuttery

no more wild than those perpetuated frequently by the wholly owned and controlled NASA, 'scientists', universities....

So you are comparing your wild unsupported claim that every geologist has been paid off permanently by NASA to do (whatever), with "wholly owned and controlled"(another wild unsupported claim) scientists...... when the analysis of these rocks is used by David as part of his presentation!

proof?

Yes proof please. Your claim, you supply the proof.


To try and get some semblance of on topic discussion going...

http://www.armaghplanet.com/blog/is-...on-hollow.html

[ambrose123]

Originally Posted by truegroup

Rubbish. I made it quite clear I don't wish this thread to degenerate into another Apollo discussion.



Budget. Don't tell me what is a legitimate answer. They may have trillions to spend on arms but getting congress to approve 100 billion for another lunar landing program when they've already been and obtained quite a large amount of information already.....seems a bit of a waste(not for me - them).

It's also a whole new development cycle and a whole new set of safety rules in place.

You see TG your " waste" of money argument is rubbish.
It will actually stimulate the US economy. It will create jobs
wealth etc. And in turn these new jobs and the wealth created
will have a positive knock on effect. "Trickle down" is the term Tories use
when giving tax cuts to their rich mates. However in this case real job
creation will benefit everyone.

[derekbuttery]

Originally Posted by truegroup

It wasn't even your point

The suggestion was made that I was attempting to pick up my "crusade", I made it quite clear that MY wish was not to debate on this thread. I OWN my opinion. Got any more sharp eyed comments

yes oh wise one. but not for here. tell me again how you think we 'landed' on the moon in 1969....

[derekbuttery]

Originally Posted by truegroup

So you are comparing your wild unsupported claim that every geologist has been paid off permanently by NASA to do (whatever), with "wholly owned and controlled"(another wild unsupported claim) scientists...... when the analysis of these rocks is used by David as part of his presentation!





Yes proof please. Your claim, you supply the proof.


To try and get some semblance of on topic discussion going...

http://www.armaghplanet.com/blog/is-...on-hollow.html

where to begin...

you know this is a forum for whacky theories such as round earth and manned missions to the moon? you know it's on the David Icke website? you know Icke supports the principle of the moon not being a natural phenomenon? (whack theory FFS :spite: - double whack theory ) and yet you still spout poo about the official story lines perpetually respond by the very same agents of TPTB.... and you propose to be a truth seeker??? OMG. TOO. MUCH. CRAP. NOT. TO. TAKE. THE. P!SS......

[derekbuttery]

Originally Posted by truegroup

http://www.armaghplanet.com/blog/is-...on-hollow.html

well, if 'Colin' says so, then IT MUST BE TRUE because true group has posted it and a link!!

[itsallundercontrol]

Good thread
I'm currently re reading 'human race get off your knees' and had to skip to chapter 14 spaceship moon after reading this thread earlier.

Anyway I just wanted to say that the book 'Who built the moon' by Christopher Knight and Alan Butler that David mentions in aforementioned chapter is in stock on amazon for £10.99 with copies from other sellers for under a fiver.

Should be a good read

[cosmic tramp]

I've read "Who Built the Moon?". Everyone should read that, be they Icke minded or not, excellent book.

Next one should be "Who Built Phobos ? " (one of Mars' moons...that one is highly anomalous).

[itsallundercontrol]

Originally Posted by cosmic tramp

I've read "Who Built the Moon?". Everyone should read that, be they Icke minded or not, excellent book.

Next one should be "Who Built Phobos ? " (one of Mars' moons...that one is highly anomalous).

I'm looking forward to it. I noticed they have copies of The Hiram Key for 1p as well.

[oz93666]

In this excellent video , one of the worlds top mystics explains the mechanics of the moon control grid ....

7:57 onward Quote...
"What they have is a Bio-organic computer , with AI in it ...all of our brains are plugged into an invisible internet that you cannot see, our brains are biological computers , transceivers...so it monitors all your thoughts , feelings ,emotions... all our insecurities. And we're tracked individually by our particular frequency. Every person has their own frequency, which they emanate , they don't need a tracking device of any kind, this frequency emanation is our own identity, or tag , that's how they track us. If they want to influence somebody in a particular way , they just focus on that frequency , just like you look for an IP address on our level of internet we have here, and that's where the focus goes....and that's how they influence people, they can beam specific energies into a person. .....The reason they wan't to control us is they see us as a resource , and they want to continue to feed off us...."



I can't remember Mr K talking about Saturn being part of this control grid.

Elsewhere it's said the Drako's designed this grid as a synthetic imitation to the archon control system, which does essentially the same thing .

The Drako's (Reps) also are influenced by the archons... not by the synthetic moon based grid.

[derekbuttery]

Originally Posted by itsallundercontrol

Good thread
I'm currently re reading 'human race get off your knees' and had to skip to chapter 14 spaceship moon after reading this thread earlier.

Anyway I just wanted to say that the book 'Who built the moon' by Christopher Knight and Alan Butler that David mentions in aforementioned chapter is in stock on amazon for £10.99 with copies from other sellers for under a fiver.

Should be a good read

google "who built the moon" free pdf.

[derekbuttery]

Originally Posted by cosmic tramp

I've read "Who Built the Moon?". Everyone should read that, be they Icke minded or not, excellent book.

Next one should be "Who Built Phobos ? " (one of Mars' moons...that one is highly anomalous).

don't you think that things like the megalithic yard and the page of measurements and ratios is just fascinating?

[itsallundercontrol]

Originally Posted by derekbuttery

google "who built the moon" free pdf.

Cheers Derek, I prefer physical books though. I find reading too much on electronic devices tends to affect my concentration and attention too much.

pdf's are great if you can't get/afford the books though that's for sure

[cosmic tramp]

Originally Posted by derekbuttery

don't you think that things like the megalithic yard and the page of measurements and ratios is just fascinating?

Yes. Very. This book really puts the maths under your nose and it just beggars belief that things are actually as they are - totally anomalous and at odds with the rest of the known universe ( or even perceived history). The very nature and characteristics of the moon (and early man's advanced understanding of it) puts any notion we may have of precision engineering (or even nature) to shame to an accuracy of inches and degrees.

I'd prescribe this book to anyone, before you even read a David Icke book and get on to speculating "who" did it and why. Impartial and objective facts and figures indicate that somebody/something certainly did.

[oz93666]

Originally Posted by derekbuttery

and the Sun is a star. So why hasn't the moon got a name like all the other 'moons' in the solar system?

It's name is the moon ....some people , and NASA, incorrectly call satellites of other planets 'moons'.

It's correct to say mars has two satellites called phobos and demos.

There's only one moon , that is earth's satellite.

Earth only has one satellite , but many artificial satellites.

Some also do the same with 'sun' referring to stars in a galaxy as 'suns' ... there's only one sun.

[grandmasterp]

Originally Posted by derekbuttery

and the Sun is a star. So why hasn't the moon got a name like all the other 'moons' in the solar system?

To its chums our moon likes to be known as Tony.
Tony Moon.

[truth seeker 09]

UFO contactee Alex Collier: The Moon is an artificial satellite, a spaceship.

@ 28:00

[derekbuttery]

Originally Posted by oz93666

It's name is the moon ....some people , and NASA, incorrectly call satellites of other planets 'moons'.

It's correct to say mars has two satellites called phobos and demos.

There's only one moon , that is earth's satellite.

Earth only has one satellite , but many artificial satellites.

Some also do the same with 'sun' referring to stars in a galaxy as 'suns' ... there's only one sun.

You're saying NASA is being incorrect?

[derekbuttery]

Originally Posted by grandmasterp

To its chums our moon likes to be known as Tony.
Tony Moon.

I always thought it was 'Harvey'...