Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > Political Manipulation / Cover-Ups / False Flags

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 19-10-2018, 10:05 AM   #381
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 26,094
Likes: 13,377 (7,703 Posts)
Default

British super-rich increase in number, poverty worsens
Thu Oct 18, 2018 06:58PM

A new report by a major Swiss bank has shown that hundreds have joined the list of ultra-rich in the United Kingdom despite evidences suggesting more and more people are slipping into poverty.

The Credit Suisse said in a report published on Thursday that 400 more people had entered the club of rich individuals with fortunes of more than $50m (£38m) in Britain, an increase of 8.5 percent compared to the previous 12-month period leading to summer of 2017.

The report, covered in the Guardian newspaper, showed that Britain now had nearly 5,000 of ultra-high net worth individuals (UHNWIs), the fourth in the world after the United States, China and Germany.

However, the report said the fortunes of the top rich in the UK were growing much faster than the general population in the country, with the booming stock market being a main reason.

An author of the report said more and more people were on the verge of joining the list of ultra-rich in the UK.

“There are a lot of people with wealth just below $50m, and they are tipping over into the UHNWI bracket,” said Anthony Shorrocks, an economist working with the Credit Suisse.

The findings come as Britain is grappling to prevent the spread of poverty among lower classes of the society.
https://www.presstv.com/Detail/2018/...divide-poverty
Likes: (2)
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-10-2018, 08:34 AM   #382
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 26,094
Likes: 13,377 (7,703 Posts)
Default

EU OWES UK 10.3 BILLION EUROS – TIME TO LEAVE AND MAY MUST GO
Posted By: Rodney Atkinsonon: October 21, 2018In: News
Print Email

The UK must demand from the European Union the share of the EU’s capital assets to which we have contributed over 46 years.

Although “nothing is agreed until everything is agreed” the European Union demands exit payments from the UK to cover the full 7 year “multiannual financial framework” up to the end of 2020 – even though we will have “left” nearly 2 years earlier.

We are committing to paying the amounts committed to before the end of 2020 but for which cash will be paid in later years. HM Treasury estimates that the UK will make around 60% of settlement payments by the end of 2021 leaving 40% to pay. Indeed as regards pensions and some other matters one Government estimate is that we will be paying small amounts up to 2064!

The EU also demands that the UK will no longer participate in the Galileo satellite system “for security reasons” even though the UK has already contributed 1.4bn Euros to the project and the EU wants to continue to benefit from UK intelligence and security information after we leave.

In other words the EU wants to keep the UK’s historic capital contributions but demand payments into the budget when we do not benefit.

Commitments on current and capital accounts should be treated the same. In other words if the UK has to pay for the “benefits” of the EU even after we have left, the EU must pay for the benefits the UK paid for and which they will continue to benefit from in the future – in other words our capital contribution.

Indeed the EU accepts this principle by accepting that the UK will receive (eventually) a re-payment of its subscribed capital to the European Investment Bank. In corporate affairs when an investor or owner leaves he can sell his shares and thus get back his share of the capital he has contributed to.

So what are the capital assets of the EU to which the UK has contributed over the last 46 years? As at 31st December 2017 there are on the European Union’s balance sheet the following capital assets to which the UK could claim it has contributed by its budget contributions over 46 years:

Property plant and equipment 10,745m
Investments 581m
Financial Assets 59,980m

Total 71.306 billion Euros

Although today the contribution to the EU budget is about 12% of the total it was of course much greater in the past when there were fewer member states, we received no rebate and, after Germany, we were the second biggest paymasters. I think it excessively fair to take 12.5% as being the long run average of UK contributions. The Government has said: “HM Treasury used the Commission’s forecast that the UK’s share of contributions to the EU budget in 2018 will be 12.7%, and assumed that it will remain at this level in 2019 and 2020. It estimated that the resulting average of the financing shares between 2014 and 2020 was also 12.7%”

12.5% of the EU assets of 71.306bn Euros is 8.9bn Euros. Adding the 1.4bn Euros contribution to the Galileo Satellite system the total to be reclaimed as an integral part of the financial settlement is 10.3bn Euros.

It is extraordinary that no such calculation has been made by the UK Government and no such claim made in the long drawn out negotiations – even as an offset against the proposed £39 billion “divorce settlement”.

THERE CAN BE NO QUESTION OF A TRANSITION PERIOD

If no agreement can be reached then there is certainly no need to have a transition period to implement a non agreement. WE simply adopt WTO rules and trade with the EU like the over 160 countries in the world who are not EU members. There should be no question of the 2 extra years budget contributions which May and Hammond want to pay.

AS the former Cabinet Minister Peter Lilley wrote on this website there was no need for a transition period since it would just involve the postponement of critical decisions. It certainly has so far!

A “transition period” will not help solve the Irish border “problem” (it is a sudden need to carry on trading which will force the EU and the Irish Republic to find the solution). During that “transition” we will have no MEPs, no EU commissioners and it seems from the Treasury figures, no rebate! The bill for the 2 extra years will be £35bn to £39bn.

If during that time the UK economy flourishes then its payments to the EU will rise – even though it is no longer a member!

EMBRACE “NO DEAL” NOW

I agree with John Redwood who has succinctly summarised the present situation:

As far as the EU is concerned the only thing on offer before we leave is a penal Withdrawal Agreement. There is nothing in the draft of that Agreement that guarantees something better in a possible Future Partnership Agreement.
As the government has failed to table a free trade agreement during the two years four months they have been negotiating, accepting the EU’s false sequencing of the talks (“pay to leave first then we might talk about trade” – RA) , there will not be one on offer before March 29, 2019.

The day after we leave trade will continue under World Trade Organisation rules – which apply tariffs (should we wish) to the massive EU exports to the UK and to the much smaller UK exports to the EU. Government revenue from the tariffs can be used to reduce the burden on exporters (already benefiting from the fall in the pound) and consumers by adjusting VAT. The WTO prohibits any political interference with trade and the imposition of non tariff barriers.

Either before or shortly afterwards the EU will be forced to come to the table and grant the UK similar trade terms as they have to Canada and are promising Japan – over 90% of trade tariff free. Given normal self interest by both sides his will be simple since we (unlike Canada or Japan) already trade on tariff free terms.

MAY MUST GO

In order to have the clear sighted trade aims and refusal to kowtow to the EU agenda the Government needs relief from its catastrophic leadership. Theresa May has taken the Remainer logic and applied it supinely to the Brexit case, thus negating Brexit. She has been weak, naively and ludicrously accommodating of her so called “EU partners”. This naivety is best summarised by her Brexit negotiator Dominic Raab who has said:

“For all that Brexit has strained our relationship, the UK and EU still share the same values and face common challenges.”

Nothing could be further from the truth as regards the political establishments of the EU, France and Germany (but increasingly not their peoples) as the devastating evidence in the books “Europe’s Full Circle”, “And into the Fire” and “Fascist Europe Rising” (see “Books” on this site) demonstrate.

May has compromised virtually every single principle she herself set out – no single market, no customs union, no European Court jurisdiction, no free movement, return of fishing and agricultural policy etc.

Even worse she has proposed a long transition period during which the EU would delay, take our money, keep passing laws without our being able to vote on them and apply ever more pressure on the UK, still effectively trapped in the EU, having given up all leverage by paying the vast divorce bill.

She must go.
http://freenations.net/eu-owes-uk-10...time-to-leave/
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2018, 11:16 PM   #383
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 26,094
Likes: 13,377 (7,703 Posts)
Default

The plan all along?

The british army is now to recruit and train foreign fighters within the british army using british taxpayers money; they say it is to make up shortfalls of recruitment but why do we need a substantial military? why don't we use the money to improve the wellbeing of british people instead?

So many of the migrants to europe have been military age men and it looks like the way the cabal are going to use them against the europeans and get them to stay in europe is to recruit them into the EU army and the british army. Then they could of course be deployed on the streets of europe against the european people themselves

Armed Forces recruits no longer need to live in Britain as MOD removes residency requirement for Commonwealth troops
By Dominic Nicholls, Defence correspondent
4 November 2018 • 9:30pm

Foreign nationals will be allowed to join the armed forces without having ever lived in Britain, ministers will announce today, in a major move to address a deepening recruitment crisis.

The Telegraph has learned that the Ministry of Defence will drop a requirement for applicants from Commonwealth countries to have resided in Britain for five years.

Military leaders now hope to recruit 1,350 extra personnel from foreign countries every year to the navy, army and air force.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...n-mod-removes/
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 04-11-2018 at 11:18 PM.
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2018, 03:13 PM   #384
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 26,094
Likes: 13,377 (7,703 Posts)
Default

Food bank use soars 13% in a year as universal credit drives new referrals, charity warns
Trussell Trust calls on the government to enact urgent changes in new welfare reform

May Bulman
Social Affairs Correspondent @maybulman
14 hours ago

Food bank use has soared by more than 13 per cent in a year as universal credit drives thousands more families to rely on emergency supplies just to feed themselves, a major charity has warned.

The Trussell Trust, the UK’s biggest food bank service, has called on the government to enact urgent changes in the new welfare reform. The charity said it had provided 658,048 emergency supplies to people in crisis between April and September 2018, compared with 580,949 over the same period the previous year.

Food banks typically receive more referrals for emergency support during the second half of the financial year, and hardship experienced annually during the colder months may be compounded by more people left waiting at least five weeks for benefit payments, the charity said.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-a8618476.html
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2018, 06:18 PM   #385
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 26,094
Likes: 13,377 (7,703 Posts)
Default

BORIS JOHNSON £40billion Brexit divorce bill means we’ll effectively become a non-voting EU colony
Our country is preparing to hand over a huge amount of money for absolutely nothing in return
Comment
By Boris Johnson
4th November 2018, 10:30 pm
Updated: 4th November 2018, 9:59 pm

IT’S a deal! That’s the word from the Brexit talks.

If yesterday’s papers are right the UK government will soon be rewarded with a Christmas present of the finest old Brussels fudge.

If this is indeed the deal that is to be placed before Cabinet on Tuesday, it is an absolute stinker.

It means we are proposing to hand over an amazing £40billion for absolutely nothing in return.

Even after we leave – according to this so called deal – we will remain in a nonsensical “implementation period” in which we will be effectively non-voting members of the EU.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/765810...-divorce-deal/
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-11-2018, 03:50 PM   #386
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 26,094
Likes: 13,377 (7,703 Posts)
Default

why we need a no deal brexit now:

Theresa May's Great Brexit Surrender Document

__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-11-2018, 01:44 PM   #387
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 26,094
Likes: 13,377 (7,703 Posts)
Default

I bet the folks over there at the independent are rubbing their hands with glee at the prospect of the government IDing and tagging the public like branded slaves of yester year...

Brexit: Introduce ID cards to control immigration instead of leaving the EU, report says
UK should do more within existing EU rules to set up national identity system and avoid 'terrible mistake' of Brexit, think tank says
Benjamin Kentish
Political Correspondent @BenKentish
13 hours ago

ID cards should be introduced in the UK as part of a new effort to control immigration without the need for Brexit, a new report has said.

Tightening current rules and forcing everyone living in the UK to have an electronic identity card would address many voters’ concerns about immigration without the need for Brexit, the Global Future think tank said.

The report was backed by Labour peer and former cabinet minister Andrew Adonis, who said Remain supporters needed to show they were responding to the issues that led people to vote for Brexit.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-a8641866.html
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 20-11-2018 at 01:45 PM.
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-11-2018, 10:13 AM   #388
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 26,094
Likes: 13,377 (7,703 Posts)
Default

Brexit betrayal

The members of the political class who are mouthpieces of the corporate oligarchic class are trying to strong-arm us into accepting theresa mays deal which would keep us in the customs union thereby derailing brexit and betraying the vote of the people to leave the EU

No deal brexit is the default and the politicians should say to brussels 'we are leaving in march. Either we have a deal with you or we don't but either way we are leaving'

Instead we are seeing the politicians attempting to wriggle out of brexit by threatening us with a complete derailment of brexit if we do not accept may's deal

The language used by amber rudd of forcing her opponents to 'look over the abyss' is the same language used by cabal gofer henry kissinger when discussing their geopolitical strategy for global hegemonic control:

Henry Kissinger interviewed by Charlie Rose in 2007 : New World Order ( NWO )




Is no-deal Brexit now off the table? PM warns that voting down her deal might mean the UK STAYING in the EU after Rudd says Parliament would not 'allow' the country to crash out

Theresa May was confronted by Tory Brexiteers during stormy PMQs session
Mrs May hints that Brexit could be cancelled if her deal does not go through
Amber Rudd says she believes the House of Commons will block no deal Brexit
Esther McVey demands assurance that UK will definitely leave the EU in March
Remainers claimed Ms Rudd had exposed Theresa May's 'bluff' on no-deal Brexit

By James Tapsfield, Political Editor, For Mailonline
Published: 09:19, 21 November 2018 | Updated: 02:17, 22 November 2018

Earlier, Ms Rudd effectively wrote off the option of Britain leaving without any agreement, saying Parliament will not 'allow that to take place'.

The comments marked a shift from Mrs May's previous insistence that the UK will leave the bloc in March whatever the outcome of negotiations.

They were immediately seized on by Remainers who said she had exposed the PM's 'bluff'.

But furious Brexiteers insisted no-deal is the default position and had already been authorised by Parliament.

The row erupted as Ms Rudd defended Mrs May's Withdrawal Agreement amid mounting criticism from all sides.

Asked whether it is not clear that the package will not get through the Commons, Ms Rudd told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: 'I don't accept that at all.'

But Ms Rudd - who returned to the Cabinet last week following the resignation of Esther McVey - said that if the agreement did fail 'anything could happen'.

'The Brexiteers may lose their Brexit,' she said.

'It is my view that the House of Commons will stop no-deal. There isn't a majority in the House of Commons to allow that to take place.'

But she added: 'I don't think we are looking at another referendum. I think people will take a careful look over the abyss - MPs of all parties - and consider whether they think it is in the best interests of the whole country.

'I think the likelihood is, despite what people say, that the Withdrawal Agreement will get through.'
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...s-stop-it.html
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2018, 06:56 PM   #389
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 26,094
Likes: 13,377 (7,703 Posts)
Default

UN Migration Pact will flood Europe with 59 million migrants, MEP warns
By Voice of Europe 30 November 2018

Janice Atkinson MEP: A Call to Action!

UK and EU citizens, get your heads out of the Brexit shambles long enough to write a letter to your heads of state before its too late!

The UN Migration Compact explained by Janice Atkinson MEP. The compact will be signed on 11/12 December if we don’t do something now! May, Merkel, Macron and other leaders will sign this and bind our countries to a no borders agreement.

Watch the video below to learn about the UN Migration Compact and why we need to send letters to our heads of state to tell them NOT to sign this disastrous compact!



https://voiceofeurope.com/2018/11/un...s/#prettyPhoto
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate
Likes: (1)
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2018, 08:14 AM   #390
JustMe418
Senior Member
 
JustMe418's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,533
Likes: 682 (481 Posts)
Default

TBH I think the whole brexit show has been intended to drag it out as far as possible, scaring people as much as they can so that a second referendum will be pushed and a remain vote achieved. I will be surprised if it goes ahead. Just look at the Lisbon treaty when the Irish were told they would have to vote again and get a yes vote.
__________________
I shoot up vertically like an arrow, and become that Above. But it is death, and the flame of the pyre. Ascend in the flame of the pyre, O my soul! Thy God is like the cold emptiness of the utmost heaven, into which thou radiatest thy little light.
JustMe418 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2018, 08:19 AM   #391
JustMe418
Senior Member
 
JustMe418's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,533
Likes: 682 (481 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iamawaveofthesea View Post
British super-rich increase in number, poverty worsens
Thu Oct 18, 2018 06:58PM

A new report by a major Swiss bank has shown that hundreds have joined the list of ultra-rich in the United Kingdom despite evidences suggesting more and more people are slipping into poverty.

The Credit Suisse said in a report published on Thursday that 400 more people had entered the club of rich individuals with fortunes of more than $50m (£38m) in Britain, an increase of 8.5 percent compared to the previous 12-month period leading to summer of 2017.

The report, covered in the Guardian newspaper, showed that Britain now had nearly 5,000 of ultra-high net worth individuals (UHNWIs), the fourth in the world after the United States, China and Germany.

However, the report said the fortunes of the top rich in the UK were growing much faster than the general population in the country, with the booming stock market being a main reason.

An author of the report said more and more people were on the verge of joining the list of ultra-rich in the UK.

“There are a lot of people with wealth just below $50m, and they are tipping over into the UHNWI bracket,” said Anthony Shorrocks, an economist working with the Credit Suisse.

The findings come as Britain is grappling to prevent the spread of poverty among lower classes of the society.
https://www.presstv.com/Detail/2018/...divide-poverty
The problem is that its easier to make huge sums if you already have loads of cash, so they just reinvest their money into other areas where they can skim the cash off the poorer people, such as the property market. For most of us its a case of just trying to get by rather than making investments and even if we do they wont have the massive yields that the rich enjoy. I do feel like the financial ponds will soon be fished out and something will have to change as you cant leave the population with nothing as that is when things become unstable.
__________________
I shoot up vertically like an arrow, and become that Above. But it is death, and the flame of the pyre. Ascend in the flame of the pyre, O my soul! Thy God is like the cold emptiness of the utmost heaven, into which thou radiatest thy little light.
JustMe418 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2018, 12:17 PM   #392
decim
Senior Member
 
decim's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 15,949
Likes: 2,865 (1,613 Posts)
Default

Hoarding money is the problem, both onshore and offshore.
There's trillions, billions, millions sat there doing phuck all but give some greedy phat twunt like Sir Philip Nigel Ross Green, peace of mind.

Current sea is useless if it isn't circulating through the economy.
__________________
DISCLAIMER: Reader discretion advised. The above post is entirely fictional, for entertainment purposes only. Any similarities to real life events, animals, humans, persons, politicians, or any other form of organisation entity living, dead or in any other state of existence are coincidental. Any opinion, comment or statements related or attributed to this username are not necessarily nor implied to be those held by the ip/computer/username or other electronic media device or service owner/user.
decim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2018, 12:31 PM   #393
wakeandsee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 122
Likes: 74 (38 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iamawaveofthesea View Post
UN Migration Pact will flood Europe with 59 million migrants, MEP warns
By Voice of Europe 30 November 2018

Janice Atkinson MEP: A Call to Action!

UK and EU citizens, get your heads out of the Brexit shambles long enough to write a letter to your heads of state before its too late!

The UN Migration Compact explained by Janice Atkinson MEP. The compact will be signed on 11/12 December if we don’t do something now! May, Merkel, Macron and other leaders will sign this and bind our countries to a no borders agreement.

Watch the video below to learn about the UN Migration Compact and why we need to send letters to our heads of state to tell them NOT to sign this disastrous compact!



https://voiceofeurope.com/2018/11/un...s/#prettyPhoto
Thanks very much iamawaveofthesea for posting the video of Janice Atkinson UK MEP, where she urges us to write physical letters to our political representatives demanding that Teresa May doesn't sign the UK up to the UN Global Compact for Immigration on 11th December in a weeks time in Marrakech, which will commit Europe to accept 50 MILLION immigrants by 2025.
I have listened to all the opinion and scare mongering since the referendum but never before heard this hard fact and I suspect neither have most people.
I phoned the 5 live phone in with Nicky Campbell this morning, but unfortunately left it a bit late to get on, as I couldn't find the number at first.
I tried again about an hour later because it was still about Brexit, but they just kept me hanging on without anyone picking up, so I wonder if I was being filtered out because of my previous call and it's subject, when I must admit I was a bit excited. I urge people to watch the video, it's not a long one.

Last edited by wakeandsee; 04-12-2018 at 12:32 PM. Reason: missed out original posters name
wakeandsee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2018, 01:55 PM   #394
JustMe418
Senior Member
 
JustMe418's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,533
Likes: 682 (481 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by decim View Post
Hoarding money is the problem, both onshore and offshore.
There's trillions, billions, millions sat there doing phuck all but give some greedy phat twunt like Sir Philip Nigel Ross Green, peace of mind.

Current sea is useless if it isn't circulating through the economy.
That is the problem but they wont part with it because it gives the wealthy a great disadvantage over other, which is power, or the illusion of power.
__________________
I shoot up vertically like an arrow, and become that Above. But it is death, and the flame of the pyre. Ascend in the flame of the pyre, O my soul! Thy God is like the cold emptiness of the utmost heaven, into which thou radiatest thy little light.

Last edited by JustMe418; 04-12-2018 at 01:55 PM.
JustMe418 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2018, 02:26 PM   #395
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 26,094
Likes: 13,377 (7,703 Posts)
Default

Who’s destroying England and Western Europe?
Jon Rappoport
3 hours ago

In the case of Brexit, climate change wasn’t the issue. Immigration was. The EU tried its best to chastise England for daring to insist unlimited numbers of migrants might be too many. “You’re in the maze, stay in the maze.”

And there is another vector of attack being launched at England: reminders the nation is evil for its colonial practices, which can never, ever be erased. But the covert leaders in that propaganda effort, the EU and its Globalist bosses, feel entitled in their own attempt to colonize the whole planet. “Your colonizing was bad, ours is good.”

With an annual budget in the vicinity of $100 billion, the EU is intractably corrupt and incompetent. It’s estimated that $5 billion a year is stolen from that budget. As for the other $95 billion, what is it for? Nations can govern themselves. The EU could disappear tomorrow and no one would catch a cold. The entire bloated structure, employing between 30 and 50 thousand people (depending on how far the count is extended) is a vast boondoggle.

It’s astonishing that anyone in the UK would feel a sense of loyalty to the EU.

There is nothing strange about Brexit at all. It’s a natural reaction: One day, a house pet goes outside and wanders off into the woods and never comes back. Who is really surprised?

The “system” called the EU insists that terrorism is somehow a price the British people must pay for entering “a better future for all.” Don’t ask what that future looks like. Don’t think about it. The UK doesn’t have the right to set its own immigration policy.

The chaos and destruction that result from open borders are simply an “adjustment period,” after which things will settle down. A new and better England and Europe will emerge. Diversity will triumph. How? Don’t worry about that, be happy.

You see, diversity is a high-minded principle, and by definition it implies a more humane society. Therefore, there is no counter-evidence. Facts are unimportant.

However, Britain is free to set its own policy.

To do so, politically correct speech will have to be jettisoned. Facts will have to be widely expressed. Lies will have to be widely exposed.

The EU will need to be named as a driving force in immigration, and the results of migration will need to be laid at its door.

The EU sees immigrant terrorism as its ticket to greater control over Europe.

Leaving the EU means LEAVING the EU.

How long before leaving means LEAVING?

How long before the British people realize that the flood of migrants is not simply “a refugee crisis” created by the US and its allies, whose imperialist policies of Empire and wars in the Middle East, Asia, and Africa, initiate “blowback?”

How long before they see numbers of these “refugees” are just military-age young men who arrive with destruction on their minds?

How long before they see England is riddled with EU agents who are “forwarding a humane immigration policy,” come hell or high water?
https://www.davidicke.com/article/51...western-europe
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-12-2018, 01:00 PM   #396
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 26,094
Likes: 13,377 (7,703 Posts)
Default

BBC is accused of 'outrageous overspend' after splurging £87million of TAXPAYER cash to build a new EastEnders set just a few hundred yards from the old one

BBC accused of 'outrageously overspending' licence fee on EastEnders' new set which will be over budget
Set is £27million over the original budget – at £86.7million - and project is expected to be nearly five years late
Work to rebuild and extend Albert Square due to be completed in August at a cost of £59.7million
National Audit Office report finds BBC's poor planning and lack of expertise means it will cost 45 per cent more and will not be completed until May 2023
By Susie Coen Tv And Radio Reporter For The Daily Mail
Published: 00:00, 13 December 2018 | Updated: 09:00, 13 December 2018

The BBC has been accused of 'outrageously overspending' licence fee cash after it emerged that EastEnders' new set will cost £86.7million.

That is £27million over the original budget – and the project is expected to be nearly five years late.

Work to rebuild and extend Albert Square was due to be completed in August at a cost of £59.7million.

But a damning National Audit Office report published today finds that the BBC's poor planning and lack of expertise means it will cost 45 per cent more, and will not be completed until May 2023.

The NAO says the Corporation 'will not be able to deliver value for money' with the project, named E20 after the soap opera's fictional Walford postcode, which is being funded entirely from the £150.50-a-year TV licence fee.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...h-new-set.html
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate
Likes: (1)
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-12-2018, 02:12 PM   #397
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 26,094
Likes: 13,377 (7,703 Posts)
Default

UK Commitment to UN Migration Pact ‘All But Violates’ Govt Immigration Pledge: Think Tank
12 Dec 2018478

A leading immigration think tank has said that the United Kingdom’s adoption of the UN’s migration pact “all but violates” the government’s pledge to cut immigration.

On Monday, the UK and 163 other nations committed themselves to the United Nations’ Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration — the first attempt at the “global governance” and institutionalisation of migration.

The UK’s delegate at the UN conference in Marrakesh, Morocco, the Foreign Office’s minister of state Alistair Burt heralded the compact, claiming it “tackles” illegal immigration.

Migration Watch UK fired back at the assertion, saying, “This is the wrong move. The word ‘control’ does not appear in the final text of the Compact.”

“The Government committed, 3 times in election manifestos, to reduce immigration by a lot (a goal supported by 73% of the public according to one poll).

The Government committed, 3 times in election manifestos, to reduce immigration by a lot (a goal supported by 73% of the public according to one poll). How is signing a Compact which binds the UK into 'enhanc[ing] the availability… of [migration] pathways' compatible with that?

— Migration Watch UK (@MigrationWatch) December 11, 2018

“How is signing a Compact which binds the UK into ‘enhanc[ing] the availability… of [migration] pathways’ compatible with that?”

Alp Mehmet, Vice Chairman of Migration Watch UK, told Breitbart London, “This Compact is misguided and one that the UK should not have signed.

“No government serious about reducing migration should be committing to it. As for our government, by signing up to the Compact, they are all but violating a manifesto promise to reduce immigration substantially.”
https://www.breitbart.com/europe/201...on-think-tank/
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-12-2018, 07:47 PM   #398
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 26,094
Likes: 13,377 (7,703 Posts)
Default

If there is a second brexit referendum that gives voters only two options to either remain in the EU or accept theresa mays deal should leavers boycott the referendum to delegitimise it as those two options woulc clearly derail brexit?

__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-12-2018, 07:50 PM   #399
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 26,094
Likes: 13,377 (7,703 Posts)
Default

Crikey Icke got it righty! David Icke says EU wants centralised power and DEATH OF NATIONS
DAVID Icke has had to put up with more than his fair share of ridicule over the years – but today in a hard-hitting podcast he warned the EU was ALWAYS designed as a centralised super-state with the ultimate aim of killing off traditional nation states.
By Lara Deauville
PUBLISHED: 12:19, Fri, Dec 14, 2018 | UPDATED: 16:58, Fri, Dec 14, 2018

Mr Icke’s straight-talking broadcast from Margate Beach seemed to nail what the BRITISH PEOPLE DEMAND from Brexit with the clarity and passion entirely absent from Parliament since the Brexit referendum itself.

The former TV presenter claimed:

* The end game of the EU project was always a centralised super-state.

* The long-term EU goal was the end of countries as they are subsumed into a sprawling Soviet-like bloc

* The abject chaos surrounding Brexit is no accident but a deliberate tactic by political elites on both sides of the Channel.

He said: “We have moved from what was sold as a free trade area and good for jobs to a centralised super-state.

“Where it’s meant to end is with a centralised control of Europe and eventually the end of countries.”

The 66-year-old former football player and broadcaster was subject to worldwide ridicule after an interview on Wogan in 1991 which saw Icke claim he was Jesus and the legendary interviewer appear to poke fun at him. A tabloid newspaper ran a splash headline ‘Crikey Ickey’s Off His Bikey’.

But he has since gained a reputation as an author and leading conspiracy theorist.

He went on to say in the podcast the result of the 2016 referendum shocked the political elite both in Britain and Europe and they had since done everything in their power to thwart Brexit.
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/10...st-Theresa-May
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate
Likes: (1)
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-12-2018, 08:43 PM   #400
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 26,094
Likes: 13,377 (7,703 Posts)
Default

Project Fear: Brexit Under Threat
The people can only be controlled if they are scared.
By: Mark Angelides December 26, 2018Articles, World

The only way to effectively control a population without resorting to violence is to keep them subdued through fear, and this is exactly what is happening to the people of the U.K. as they try to get their democratic rights enacted.

On June 23, 2016, the British people took part in the largest ever democratic exercise in the nation’s history: They voted to leave the confines of the European Union and all of its institutions. The people voted, and the politicians acted. Unfortunately, the Westminster parliamentarians acted in none but their own interest.

More than two years later and Britain is still shackled to a supranational organization that is all too happy to punish the country as an example to others who dare to try to leave.
Project Fear

The entirety of the U.K. establishment has taken it upon themselves to carry out the greatest propaganda exercise the land of Shakespeare has ever witnessed. Welcome to Project Fear. The poor folk of Britain who chose to turn their backs on the foreign overlords of the European Council and Presidency which cannot be unelected, cannot be voted for, and who have the sole power to make law within the European Union. These are the same institutions, along with the current U.K. government, which are now in the process of trying scare Brits out of their minds.

Here are some of the Project Fear predictions the government has made:

No clean drinking water.
Food shortages.
No insulin for diabetics.
Shortages of medicine.
No more sandwiches (yes, really).
Risk of “super-gonorrhea” epidemic.
Immediate recession.
Every family thousands of pounds poorer.
No planes allowed through other nations’ aerospace.
The south of England becomes a carpark for trucks that were previously engaged in barrier-free trade between nations.

All these trials and tribulations are being presented by the government and the establishment media as undisputable future events in order to terrify the poor slobs of Britain.

The Plan

The idea behind Project Fear is to get the nation so scared that when the government eventually decides to call for a second referendum on the Brexit decision – which they will – the sheep will vote in the “correct” way.

How do we know this is what is happening? Well, it has happened before, in every country that ever voted to leave the E.U. or reject a new treaty that pushed for greater integration into the European whole. In France and Ireland, the government and media launched concerted attacks against the voters, and then, quelle surprise, asked the public to vote again … just to be sure they had actually voted for what they really wanted.

To ensure a second public vote on Britain’s continued membership of the European Union, Prime Minister Theresa May has capitulated to every demand made by the European Presidency. Why? Because the people will see that May’s “deal” is actually worse than being tethered to the sclerotic union, and this has surely been done on purpose.
Britain on the Ropes

It is not as though the British public are unaware that this is what is happening. Project Fear is on the lips of all, whether down the local pub, at the supermarket, or online, everyone is talking about the British government’s plans to lock the U.K. permanently into a European customs union and single market.

Has the government gone too far? There is still time to resolve the Brexit issue without dividing the nation even further. There are groups who are willing to use violence to achieve their ends, and there are those who would prefer anarchy to order. Before either of these two forces gain traction, the prime minister must act decisively and for the good of the nation.
https://www.libertynation.com/projec...-under-threat/
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:19 PM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.