Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > The Global Awakening

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-01-2018, 09:04 PM   #201
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

Kennedy accuses Emanuel of 'strategic gentrification plan' to force blacks out of Chicago
By Rick Pearson and Bill Ruthhart
Contact Reporter
Chicago Tribune
January 4th 2018

Democratic governor candidate Chris Kennedy on Wednesday accused Mayor Rahm Emanuel of leading a “strategic gentrification plan” aimed at forcing African-Americans and other minorities out of Chicago to make the city “whiter” and wealthier.

“I believe that black people are being pushed out of Chicago intentionally by a strategy that involves disinvestment in communities being implemented by the city administration, and I believe Rahm Emanuel is the head of the city administration and therefore needs to be held responsible for those outcomes,” Kennedy said during a news conference about gun violence in North Lawndale.

“This is involuntary. That we’re cutting off funding for schools, cutting off funding for police, allowing people to be forced to live in food deserts, closing hospitals, closing access to mental health facilities. What choice do people have but to move, to leave?” Kennedy added. “And I think that’s part of a strategic gentrification plan being implemented by the city of Chicago to push people of color out of the city. The city is becoming smaller, and as it becomes smaller, it’s become whiter.”
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/l...103-story.html
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2018, 03:44 PM   #202
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

Are Whites Being Setup For Genocide?
January 6, 2018 | Categories: Articles & Columns | Tags: | Print This Article Print This Article
Paul Craig Roberts

Identity Politics has responded with outrage against People Magazine’s choice of white male country singer Blake Shelton as “sexiest man in the world.” According to adherents of Identity Politics, the choice indicates that People Magazine is itself racist and part of the white supremacy movement to elevate white people above people of color. The choice is doubly outrageous because, according to a writer in Salon, it reinforces and celebrates toxic white male sexuality and elevates a white man to a position of popular acclaim.

Every white person needs to read this article — http://www.unz.com/article/the-end-of-white-celebrity/ — to understand how they are being demonized and marginalized to the point of oblivion. By focusing primarily on white heterosexual males, Identity Politics tries to split white women off from white men by the use of the pejorative “misogynist”, but, as the article reports, white women, such as Taylor Swift, are also publicly demonized for their whiteness.

Reading this article in The Unz Review reminded me of an article I read last November in a Texas university newspaper that declared white DNA to be an abomination. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/11/30...on-column.html

Think about this for a minute. Suppose the writer had said “homosexual DNA is an abomination,” or “black DNA is an abomination,” or, heaven forbid, “Jewish DNA is an abomination.” Anyone who declared homosexuals, blacks, or Jews to be an abomination would be instantly fired, sued, charged with hate crimes and driven so deep into the ground that they would never reemerge.

The article in the student newspaper was a bit too much for Texas and produced a furor of its own. Lost in the furor was the realization that the writer was correctly interpreting the Identity Politics that today defines the liberal/progressive/left. Hillary Clinton herself expressed Identity Politics when she declared Americans who rejected her as president to be “deplorables.” CounterPunch printed an essay by its radio host that concluded Trump’s election was not legitimate because he was elected by racist, sexist, homophobic white male Trump deplorables.

In other words, Identity Politics cannot be dismissed as some sort of idiocy on the part of a few kooks. It is institutionalized in American politics and culture and is becoming a habitual way of thinking. The growing demonization of white people parallels the demonization of the Jews and can result in marginalization and physical destruction.

The immigration policies of white countries have created a diversity basis for ganging up on whites. If we put together a diverse population with the anti-white ideology of Identity Politics, we have a political and cultural trap for white people.

It seems paradoxical that Identity Politics is led by white/liberal/progressive/leftists advocating their own marginalization. However, as it is a correct conclusion from Identity Politics that white DNA is an abomination, white adherents of the ideology can logically see their demise as a benefit to humanity. But why should they be allowed to condemn whites who do not see themselves as an abomination?

What we are seeing unfold with Identity Politics was foretold by Jean Raspail in his futuristic novel The Camp of the Saints. Perhaps white people should read it as an indication of their possible fate.
https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/201...etup-genocide/
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2018, 05:50 PM   #203
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

‘White racism’ course at Florida university sparks threats & outrage, as expected
Published time: 10 Jan, 2018 00:26
Edited time: 10 Jan, 2018 11:53

A Florida university has been accused of stoking racial tensions with a controversial new course. It has already irked people to such an extent that police officers will be stationed outside the classroom.

Florida Gulf Coast University rolled out the new course entitled, “White racism,” on Tuesday as part of its Spring semester to “examine the racist ideologies, laws, policies, and practices” that have allowed “white racial domination over those racialized as non-white.”

Course director Ted Thornhill, an assistant professor of sociology, said he’s received a raft of emails challenging the academic integrity of such a course, as well as more abusive messages including racial slurs and those branding him a racist. “Cancer (Stage 4) is what you and your family deserve for spreading hate, lies & intolerance,” one detractor wrote, as cited by News Press.
https://www.rt.com/usa/415422-white-...ampaign=chrome
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2018, 09:35 PM   #204
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

Educator Claims “White Power” Forced On Society Through ‘Civility,’ Response Incredible
12/16/2017 Emma Laftchu
rwcnews.com/educator-claims-white-power-forced-on-society-through-civility-response-incredible.html

Mark Nook is the president of Northern Iowa University where this ridiculous study took place.

Two liberal college professors from the University of Northern Iowa, Kyle Rudick and Kathryn Golsan, have conducted a study and come to the conclusion that civility on college campuses is white informed civility and was created to serve whites.

The study has been labeled, Civility and White Institutional Presence: An Exploration of White Students’ Understanding of Race Talk at a Traditionally White Institution. This is a part of the new Critical Whiteness Studies programs found on college campuses. Critical Whiteness Studies serve to help some virtue signal through self-loathing, and attempts to shame others who will not engage in their ridiculous notions.

They have labeled civility “whiteness informed civility” and drawn some outlandish conclusions. For instance, white students who feel bad after the indoctrination of schools shaming whites for their race have said they make an extra effort to be nice to minorities. From this, the study draws the conclusion that this behavior only serves to promote “White privilege” and “White racial power.” Ben Shapiro brilliantly debunks white privilege in the short clip below.


It gets more ridiculous. Treating everyone the same way was labeled as a means to create “good white identity.” Students who try to avoid talking about race, treating it like politics or religion, are labeled “race evasive.” Student who say they treat everyone the same “functions to erase racial identity in an attempt to impose a race-evasive frame on race-talk.”

American Universities are succumbing to liberals turning our higher education system into a laughingstock. This study is a reflection of the anti-white sentiment being peddled by race baiters. It serves to help the left as they attempt to create a generation of victims and develop a hierarchy of victim-hood.

Kyle Rudick is an assistant professor at the college, his profile on the University of Norther Iowa website reads, “I am a critical communications scholar who studies how power, privilege and oppression are constructed and marshaled through everyday communicative performances.” The man has made a career out of teaching students born in the greatest country on the planet, students who are afforded the opportunity to go to a university to study, that they are victims.

http://www.researchgate.net/profile/...nstitution.pdf
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 10-01-2018 at 09:35 PM.
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2018, 10:03 PM   #205
vancity eagle
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 10,492
Likes: 4,419 (2,496 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iamawaveofthesea View Post
‘White racism’ course at Florida university sparks threats & outrage, as expected
Published time: 10 Jan, 2018 00:26
Edited time: 10 Jan, 2018 11:53

A Florida university has been accused of stoking racial tensions with a controversial new course. It has already irked people to such an extent that police officers will be stationed outside the classroom.

Florida Gulf Coast University rolled out the new course entitled, “White racism,” on Tuesday as part of its Spring semester to “examine the racist ideologies, laws, policies, and practices” that have allowed “white racial domination over those racialized as non-white.”

Course director Ted Thornhill, an assistant professor of sociology, said he’s received a raft of emails challenging the academic integrity of such a course, as well as more abusive messages including racial slurs and those branding him a racist. “Cancer (Stage 4) is what you and your family deserve for spreading hate, lies & intolerance,” one detractor wrote, as cited by News Press.
https://www.rt.com/usa/415422-white-...ampaign=chrome

Quite frankly there is nothing wrong with having a Sociology course exploring racist ideologies, laws, policies, and practises which have been a part of the American DNA from its inception hundreds of years ago and continues on to this very day.

In fact America would be much better off if people were actually educated in this regard.

Now I personally would not call it "White Racism" , I'd probably call it something like "History of Radical Right Politics in America" or something like that.

Of course "white racism" is a very integral and dominating aspect of Radical Right Politics in America.

But clearly the professor has called it this to "be more provocative" and to create more attention for his course. He has admitted to doing so. It's basically a marketing strategy to get more people in his class and to start debate.

Like I said I personally would not call the course that, but I wonder if the people who would complain about the name of this course would also complain about when politicians use the term "Islamic terror"

Islamic being the specific kind of terror, in the same vein as White racism being the specific kind of racism.

I'm pretty sure those getting worked up over the name of the course have no problem with the term "Islamic Terror" or how it is used all over the world of politics and political narratives.
vancity eagle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2018, 10:45 PM   #206
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vancity eagle View Post
Quite frankly there is nothing wrong with having a Sociology course exploring racist ideologies, laws, policies, and practises which have been a part of the American DNA from its inception hundreds of years ago and continues on to this very day.

In fact America would be much better off if people were actually educated in this regard.

Now I personally would not call it "White Racism" , I'd probably call it something like "History of Radical Right Politics in America" or something like that.

Of course "white racism" is a very integral and dominating aspect of Radical Right Politics in America.

But clearly the professor has called it this to "be more provocative" and to create more attention for his course. He has admitted to doing so. It's basically a marketing strategy to get more people in his class and to start debate.

Like I said I personally would not call the course that, but I wonder if the people who would complain about the name of this course would also complain about when politicians use the term "Islamic terror"

Islamic being the specific kind of terror, in the same vein as White racism being the specific kind of racism.

I'm pretty sure those getting worked up over the name of the course have no problem with the term "Islamic Terror" or how it is used all over the world of politics and political narratives.
its really about turning factions of society against each other

look around....it's working

they have 'womens studies' in universities to tell women how evil men are

they have 'islamic studies' to tell people how great islam is and how bad the west is

they have 'gay studies' to tell people that gay people are victims and that society must bend for them

they have 'african studies' to tell people how white people are devils

But here's the ironic part.....the people who have been shaping society in the west and who were behind the colonialism of the 1600-1800's are the rothschild cabal who are the very same people behind all this frankfurt school, critical theory IDENTARIAN politics in universities

In the political arena they are creating this hegelian dialectic where they are trying to create a narrative that the israel supporting 'right' are at war with the globalist 'left' but really the rothschild cabal are behind both of those

Ultimately the collapse of society all feeds into the end game agenda of enslaving everyone to their globalist-technocratic-communist world government

I think the rothschild cabal are already working with the chinese 'immortal' families who have the chinese population locked down tight in a technocratic prison state already where the internet is firewalled and citizens are given a citizen ratings score

To get westerners into that state of being they have to strip white people of their self esteem and pride because those are the things that make people stand up for themselves

Part of that is about cultivating shame and self hatred which is amplified if everyone else in society is treating you like a leper
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2018, 11:00 PM   #207
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

The problem is that there are a lot of angry people now with an axe to grind so its easy for the NWO to dupe people and recruit them into this agenda

That's not to say that there hasn't been injustices in the world...there HAVE BEEN

But the point is that the narratives that are being formed are too simplistic and they stigmatise all white people when if you look into the historical reality going way back all the things that people are upset about like slavery, lack of female emancipation, homosexuality laws and so on have all been shaped by a small and powerful el-ite who are still in control today and who are the ones now changing the game again to their advantage. Its them who have bombed muslim countries and yet it is also them funnelling muslims into europe and it is them pushing islamic studies courses at universities etc. they are stirring the pot

It takes a deeper understanding to see the game being played at that level and most people are only looking at the surface narratives being offered by the corporate media or critical theory university courses none of which will mention the rothschild cabal
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 10-01-2018 at 11:06 PM.
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2018, 03:51 AM   #208
vancity eagle
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 10,492
Likes: 4,419 (2,496 Posts)
Default

[QUOTE]
Quote:
Originally Posted by iamawaveofthesea View Post
its really about turning factions of society against each other

look around....it's working
I agree they are turning factions against each other, but I don't agree with where you think it is being directed from.

Quote:
they have 'womens studies' in universities to tell women how evil men are

they have 'islamic studies' to tell people how great islam is and how bad the west is

they have 'gay studies' to tell people that gay people are victims and that society must bend for them

they have 'african studies' to tell people how white people are devils
come on man, the above is a bunch of simplistic bullshit.

I am sure "women's studies" is actually about to social and political struggle women have gone through, highlighting things like universal suffrage, the feminist movement of the 60's.

likewise Islamic studies are likely just history of Islam from its rise in the 700's to its expansion into Europe, the golden age of Islam in the middle ages, the Ottoman empire, reform, I don't see how "Islamic studies" would be any different than "Christian studies" or "Buddhism studies"

and also to claim "African studies" is about portraying white people as devils is the stupidest thing I have ever heard. No It would be about the history of African's in Africa or African's in the Americas.

The only person pushing a divisive narrative would be anyone writing the garbage you have written above.

Quote:
But here's the ironic part.....the people who have been shaping society in the west and who were behind the colonialism of the 1600-1800's are the rothschild cabal who are the very same people behind all this frankfurt school, critical theory IDENTARIAN politics in universities
also the same people behind "white supremacy" and White identity politics which existed for hundreds of years before "Frankfurt school", and without "white supremacy" there would be no "Frankfurt school"

Also speaking of Universities, you should know that billionaire backed organizations such as "Young Americas Foundation" and "Young Americans for Freedom" have been spending hundreds of millions of dollars promoting far right ideology in American highschools and Universities since the 1960's.

So this idea that Universities and colleges are the sole domain of "cultural Marxists" is outrageously FALSE.

These organizations have also been spreading their propaganda on US campuses for well over 50 years, and are responsible for shaping the ideas of future politicians like

Jeff Sessions - Trump attorney General
Steven Miller -Trump advisor linked to the Alt right
Ronald Reagan
Barry Goldwater - 1968 presidential candidate who opposed civil rights
Lew Rockwell - Libertarian proponent

any many others.

Currently these organizations which were founded by CIA and Skull and Bones member William F Buckley spend tens of millions of dollars annually to get right wing speakers such as (Ann Coulter, David Horowitz, Ben Shapiro, Liz Cheney, Bay Buchanan (Pat Buchanan's sister), Robert Spencer) before College, University, and highschool audiences. This is social conditioning and a changing of the paradigm which enabled a guy like Trump to be elected. But as you always like to say, "a revolution from above" Propaganda funded by billionaires to be spread throughout the institutions of higher learning, as well as talk radio, alternative media, Fox News, internet forums etc.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Young_...27s_Foundation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Young_...ns_for_Freedom

Quote:
In the political arena they are creating this hegelian dialectic where they are trying to create a narrative that the israel supporting 'right' are at war with the globalist 'left' but really the rothschild cabal are behind both of those
yet you still cannot admit that Brexit is also a fraud and also a part of the hegeilian dialectic, and controlled by the same elites, when I have proven this to you time and time again. As you admitted above, they can work towards the same agenda with different means.

Quote:
Ultimately the collapse of society all feeds into the end game agenda of enslaving everyone to their globalist-technocratic-communist world government

I think the rothschild cabal are already working with the chinese 'immortal' families who have the chinese population locked down tight in a technocratic prison state already where the internet is firewalled and citizens are given a citizen ratings score

To get westerners into that state of being they have to strip white people of their self esteem and pride because those are the things that make people stand up for themselves

Part of that is about cultivating shame and self hatred which is amplified if everyone else in society is treating you like a leper
And this reads as typical right wing propaganda where the threat is every other place on the earth and behind every door other than where it really exists. Western capitalists. Like I explained above organizations like the YAF have been also hard at work brainwashing the youth, as have a wide variety of billionaire funded think tanks and organizations infesting politics, education, and media for decades.

The idea of Western culture and civilization (or white people) being under attack, is a key narrative of this elite inspired and false propaganda in order to support an aggressive fascist state policy both abroad and domestically. This is the key ingredient to perhaps the current #1 agenda of the NWO which is to create a "Clash of Civilizations"

You and your ideas are a product of decades of propaganda.

That's why you would believe something so ridiculous like "African studies" being about "white devils"

Last edited by vancity eagle; 11-01-2018 at 04:06 AM.
vancity eagle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2018, 04:02 AM   #209
vancity eagle
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 10,492
Likes: 4,419 (2,496 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iamawaveofthesea View Post
The problem is that there are a lot of angry people now with an axe to grind so its easy for the NWO to dupe people and recruit them into this agenda

That's not to say that there hasn't been injustices in the world...there HAVE BEEN

But the point is that the narratives that are being formed are too simplistic and they stigmatise all white people when if you look into the historical reality going way back all the things that people are upset about like slavery, lack of female emancipation, homosexuality laws and so on have all been shaped by a small and powerful el-ite who are still in control today and who are the ones now changing the game again to their advantage. Its them who have bombed muslim countries and yet it is also them funnelling muslims into europe and it is them pushing islamic studies courses at universities etc. they are stirring the pot

It takes a deeper understanding to see the game being played at that level and most people are only looking at the surface narratives being offered by the corporate media or critical theory university courses none of which will mention the rothschild cabal
you are talking about "simplistic narratives" and you just wrote in the previous thread that "African studies is about making white people look like devils"

I don't think you really realize not only how much of a hypocrite you are, but how you are just as much the problem, if not more, than those you always accuse.

Nobody is "stigmitizing all white people" NOt anybody with any reach or influence. This is all hyped up myth by right wing operatives and disnifo merchants like Alex Jones, Breitbart, or the Alt right clowns on youtube and 4chan. Their whole game is to provoke and sow division, and they do a great job of it. Got you all wound up.
vancity eagle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2018, 08:55 AM   #210
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vancity eagle View Post
you are talking about "simplistic narratives" and you just wrote in the previous thread that "African studies is about making white people look like devils"

I don't think you really realize not only how much of a hypocrite you are, but how you are just as much the problem, if not more, than those you always accuse.

Nobody is "stigmitizing all white people" NOt anybody with any reach or influence. This is all hyped up myth by right wing operatives and disnifo merchants like Alex Jones, Breitbart, or the Alt right clowns on youtube and 4chan. Their whole game is to provoke and sow division, and they do a great job of it. Got you all wound up.
Of course they are not going to say things explicitly like 'white people are devils' but by nudging people in certain directions they can mould peoples perceptions

I have been through the higher education system through a number of courses and i've seen how they can mould people to perceive things certain ways

So what i mean by them framing white people as devils is that they will go on endlessly in the tradition of critical theory to cover myopically western driven colonialism but without looking at how the west was itself colonised by the el-ite who then pushed that colonialism out of europe

Also i think they will ignore the wider context of what other empires and peoples were doing eg the ottomans, jewish money men and arab slavers and so on so that over the course people build an impression that white people are to blame for all of the worlds problems

They won't for example look at the role of the rothschilds and how they have also kept white people down
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 11-01-2018 at 09:26 AM.
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2018, 09:12 AM   #211
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vancity eagle View Post
I agree they are turning factions against each other, but I don't agree with where you think it is being directed from.

come on man, the above is a bunch of simplistic bullshit.

I am sure "women's studies" is actually about to social and political struggle women have gone through, highlighting things like universal suffrage, the feminist movement of the 60's.

likewise Islamic studies are likely just history of Islam from its rise in the 700's to its expansion into Europe, the golden age of Islam in the middle ages, the Ottoman empire, reform, I don't see how "Islamic studies" would be any different than "Christian studies" or "Buddhism studies"

and also to claim "African studies" is about portraying white people as devils is the stupidest thing I have ever heard. No It would be about the history of African's in Africa or African's in the Americas.

The only person pushing a divisive narrative would be anyone writing the garbage you have written above.*
There are things people can't change like their gender, sexuality or skin colour and it's wrong to descriminate on the basis of those things but religions are just IDEAS.

We should be free to dissect, criticise and deconstruct all religions such as christianity, islam and judaism but it is increasingly becoming the case that we are not allowed to even question the ideas that underpin them

Equally with immigration there is a difference between natural small scale wanderings of individuals and small groups and large scale orchestrated movements of people. This MASS immigration that we are seeing these days is underpinned by IDEOLOGY and we should be free to question ideologies as like religion they are only IDEAS

You may say that it is really just racism but I am not just questioning mass immigration from say africa for example i also question mass immigration of white people from within europe too. It is all part of the same IDEOLOGICAL drive to destroy european cultures and any sense of national identity or connection to place.

What your task on this forum seems to be is to do 3 main things:

1) to entrench the hegelian dialectic by constantly pushing one side of it and refusing to look deeper into the issue and into the nuances and thereby destracting everyone from the over-schemes like the SMART grid and geoengineering and the imposition of central banking and digital currency

2) to shout down anyone who exposes all of these things and to deny, deny, deny that there is a conspiracy; you really don't want people to see that the left and right are controlled by the same people at the top of it all

3) to constantly make issues about race and therefore to keep people on the level of EMOTION instead of allowing them to see that there is an IDEOLOGY underpinning all of this so that people can then discuss that RATIONALLY
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 11-01-2018 at 09:28 AM.
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2018, 09:18 AM   #212
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vancity eagle View Post
also the same people behind "white supremacy" and White identity politics which existed for hundreds of years before "Frankfurt school", and without "white supremacy" there would be no "Frankfurt school"

Also speaking of Universities, you should know that billionaire backed organizations such as "Young Americas Foundation" and "Young Americans for Freedom" have been spending hundreds of millions of dollars promoting far right ideology in American highschools and Universities since the 1960's.

So this idea that Universities and colleges are the sole domain of "cultural Marxists" is outrageously FALSE.

These organizations have also been spreading their propaganda on US campuses for well over 50 years, and are responsible for shaping the ideas of future politicians like

Jeff Sessions - Trump attorney General
Steven Miller -Trump advisor linked to the Alt right
Ronald Reagan
Barry Goldwater - 1968 presidential candidate who opposed civil rights
Lew Rockwell - Libertarian proponent

any many others.

Currently these organizations which were founded by CIA and Skull and Bones member William F Buckley spend tens of millions of dollars annually to get right wing speakers such as (Ann Coulter, David Horowitz, Ben Shapiro, Liz Cheney, Bay Buchanan (Pat Buchanan's sister), Robert Spencer) before College, University, and highschool audiences. This is social conditioning and a changing of the paradigm which enabled a guy like Trump to be elected. But as you always like to say, "a revolution from above" Propaganda funded by billionaires to be spread throughout the institutions of higher learning, as well as talk radio, alternative media, Fox News, internet forums etc.
you just don't get it do you?

technocratic communism is not the enemy of corporatism and monopoly capitalism

it is the peak of it

so yeah they could push aggressive corporatism when it suited them to deregulate their corporations so that they could take over the economy but once that is achieved and they clearly now DO dominate not just the domestic market but the global one too they then have to set about completing their capture of government and of the populace and that is where they institute their technocratic-communist state with its SMART grid, internet of things and digital currency

To achieve that stage of the process they have to socially engineer society and divide and rule and that is what this shift in the universities is

It is not that 'liberal' professors have suddenly taken over from right wing professors. It is that the el-ite are simply carrying out a different phase of the same longterm agenda.

You clearly don't want people to be able to see that perhaps because you are cheerleading the agenda or at least what you think the agenda is
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 11-01-2018 at 09:30 AM.
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2018, 10:17 AM   #213
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2018, 10:56 AM   #214
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

The real reason behind the orchestrated tensions and the resultant social engineering:

The Vision Of Technocracy And Your Future
January 10, 2018
By Jon Rappoport

“Well, boys, we’ve got this strange thing called THE INDIVIDUAL. Could somebody tell me what he is? He’s not conforming to our algorithms. He’s all over the place. And while we’re at it, what the hell is this IMAGINATION? It keeps slipping out of our grasp, it doesn’t fit the plan…”

PART ONE

—Technocrats say they want to wipe out poverty, war, and inequality. But in order to achieve these lofty goals (or pretend to), they need to re-program humans—

Technocracy is the basic agenda and plan for ruling global society from above, so we need to understand it from several angles.

Consider a group of enthusiastic forward-looking engineers in the early 20th century. They work for a company that has a contract to manufacture a locomotive.

This is a highly complex piece of equipment.

On one level, workers are required to make the components to spec. Then they must put them all together. These tasks are formidable.

On another level, various departments of the company must coordinate their efforts. This is also viewed as a technological job. Organizing is considered a technology.

When the locomotive is finished and delivered, and when it runs on its tracks and pulls a train, a great and inspiring victory is won.

And then…the engineers begin to think about the implications. Suppose the locomotive was society itself? Suppose society was the finished product? Couldn’t society be put together in a coordinated fashion? And couldn’t the “technology of organizing things” be utilized for the job?

Why bother with endlessly arguing and lying politicians? Why should they be in charge? Isn’t that an obvious losing proposition? Of course it is.

Engineers could lay out and build a future society that would benefit all people. Disease and poverty could be wiped out. Eliminating them would be part of the blueprint.

This “insight” hit engineers and technicians like a ton of bricks. Of course! All societies had been failures for the same reason: the wrong people were in charge.

Armed with this new understanding, engineers of every stripe began to see what was needed. A revolution in thinking about societal organization. Science was the new king. And science would rule.

Of course, for an engineered world to work, certain decisions would have to be made about the role of the individual. Every individual. You couldn’t have an air-tight plan if every human were free to pursue his own objectives. Too many variables. Too much confusion. Too much conflict. Well, that problem could be solved. The individual’s actions would be tailored to fit the coordinated operations of the planned society.

The individual would be “one of the components of the locomotive.” His life would be connected to other lives to produce an exemplary shape.

Yes, this could imply a few problems, but those problems could be worked out. They would have to be worked out, because the overriding goal was the forming of a world organization. What would you do if one bolt (an individual human) in one wheel of a locomotive was the wrong size? You would go back and correct the error. You would re-make the bolt.

Other people entered the game. High-echelon Globalists saw technocracy as a system they could use to control the population.

Essentially, an already-misguided vision of a future technocratic utopia was hijacked. Something bad was made much worse.

In a nutshell, this is the history of technocracy.

A locomotive is a society? No. That was the first fatally flawed idea. Everything that followed was increasingly bizarre.

Unfortunately, many people in our world believe in Globalism, if you could call a partial vague view a legitimate belief. They dreamily float on all the propaganda cover stories—greatest good for the greatest number of people; no more poverty; equality of sharing; reducing the carbon footprint; a green economy; “sustainable development”; international cooperation; allotting production and consumption of goods and services for the betterment of everyone; and all of this delivered from a central platform of altruistic guidance.

If you track down the specifics that sit under these cover stories, you discover a warped system of planning that expresses control over the global population.

The collective utopia turns out to be a sham.

Waking up is hard to do? Breaking up is hard to do? They must be done.

A workable technological fix is a very nice achievement when the project is a machine. But transferring that glow of victory to the whole of society is an illusion. Anything that calls itself education would tackle the illusion as the first order of business.

Engineering society requires engineering humans.

That is the fatal flaw.

It’s called mind control.
read on here for part and three https://www.activistpost.com/2018/01...cy-future.html
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 11-01-2018 at 10:56 AM.
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2018, 11:01 AM   #215
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

PART TWO

Any genuine artist, any builder of communities, any sane activist, any honorable visionary stands outside technocracy, and is not part of this program.

Instead, his thrust is toward more individual freedom and a more open society with greater decentralization of power.

Decentralization is the key.

The use of technology does not imply living inside its control. The use of technology does not imply that society should be laid out like a giant machine with fitted parts.

Those futurists who have offered “overall plans” for the disposition of society generally ignore or sidestep the issue of who is going to administer the plan. To say this is an error is a vast understatement.

Where is one far-reaching center of power in our world that would run society?

All such centers of power are, first and foremost, dedicated to their own survival. And after that, they are dedicated to control of the territory they believe they own. THE INDIVIDUAL is a messy thing that needs to be sidelined or dealt with as a disruptive element.

I speak to those people who understand that the idea of the free, independent, powerful, and creative individual is being sidelined, shelved, and sent down the memory hole. This is no accident. This isn’t just a devolutionary trend. Technocrats see this as a necessary action, in order to “clean up” their equation for the civilization they’re building. The individual is a slippery variable that throws a monkey wrench into formulas.
https://www.activistpost.com/2018/01...cy-future.html
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2018, 11:01 AM   #216
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

PART THREE

Imagination never dies.

It belongs to the individual. It isn’t property of the group.

It enables solutions that eradicate problems and get out ahead of problems before they raise their heads.

Time and time again, the individual, as he wends his way through life, encounters persons and organizations that consider imagination a negative. In the clearly defined shapes of society, imagination must take a back seat to planning.

Is the individual resistant to such manipulations, or does he give in?

This is the key question.

Does the individual view society as an operation that can potentially lift up individuals and empower them? Or does he give in to the idea that society should create more and more dependent people?

The individual can be a source of spreading freedom, or he can defend the notion that there are an endless number of “entitlements” that must be honored.
Technocracy promotes entitlements as a doorway into the future. Its ultimate entitlement goes this way: you have the right to be re-programmed to believe you have a slot in the future world; we will make this slot as attractive as possible; you will serve the overall good as we engineer it.

That is the fundamental justification for the Welfare State. It’s the justification for a future technocratic policy which will assign citizens energy quotas. A citizen would be permitted to consume a set amount of energy in a given time period. (So-called smart meters are a step in that direction. The meters enable more specific measurements of energy consumption.)

This is how technocracy views the future…your future.

The ultimate technocratic vision? Your brain is a processor, and your brain is your mind. That’s all your mind is. Therefore, connecting your brain to a super-computer, or to the Cloud, will magically expand your mind and make it “more than human.”

You will become trans-human. A hybrid of human and machine.

This is the fairy tale to end all fairy tales.

It’s wishful fantasy dressed up as science.

The idea is: you will become More. You will overcome the limits and problems associated with being an individual.

Every individual will receive the same information and the same answers and the same solutions from the Cloud. AUTOMATICALLY.

This is the programmer’s wet dream.

Technocrats will thus be able to build a global society and control its every facet.

That’s the revolution.

The counter-revolution is YOU.

The free individual.

Never forget it.https://www.activistpost.com/2018/01...cy-future.html
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 11-01-2018 at 11:02 AM.
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2018, 11:02 AM   #217
mranderson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: best planet in the Solar System
Posts: 3,742
Likes: 3,829 (1,979 Posts)
Default

what should concern everyone , no matter your creed is that Google is DARPA / Boston Dynamics too

not a good idea to let these people decide how the ''truth'' will be determined by A.I algorithms fitted inside a SKYNET like system
__________________
music sound and movement

They might drain the swamp but the snakes are still in the grass


It's symbolic of his struggle against reality
Likes: (1)
mranderson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2018, 11:14 AM   #218
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mranderson View Post
what should concern everyone , no matter your creed is that Google is DARPA / Boston Dynamics too

not a good idea to let these people decide how the ''truth'' will be determined by A.I algorithms fitted inside a SKYNET like system
yes we are going to enslave you to the corporate technocracy and ultimately plug you into the borg but lets face it the world is full of inequality and racism and gender bias so why would you want to stay in this reality anyway?

we can offer you an escape...a bright new future...a brave new world

And in the meantime you can vent all your frustrations against white people and men which will be fun won't it? After all we don't want those pesky and ruggedly individual white males disrupting our brave new technological-collectivist-matrix reality do we?

In fact we won't just normalise your anti-white racism we will institutionalise it so that you can act as our enforcement arm

We won't just facilitate its spread on social media we will actually award you and reward you with qualifications from universities for immersing yourself in it

Now put on your electronic yarmulke and we can begin...and don't worry...we'll control...i mean we'll handle everything for you...

now come on sons of ham, we are your friends; we have nothing to do with those bad guys in israel...honest. Look at how nice we are to you in our media....see? yes we are the good guys

Now turn on, plug in and drop out and praise be to our lord and master silicon consciousness!

__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 11-01-2018 at 11:47 AM.
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2018, 01:23 PM   #219
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

Meritocracy Is A "Tool Of Whiteness", Math Professor Claims
by Tyler Durden
Tue, 01/09/2018 - 22:45
Authored by Toni Airaksinen via CampusReform.org,

A math education professor at Brooklyn College contends in a recent academic article that “meritocracy” in math classes is a “tool of whiteness.”

Laurie Rubel implicates both meritocracy and “color-blindness” as ideological precepts that hold back racial minorities from succeeding in math classes in an article for the peer-reviewed Journal of Urban Mathematics Education.

Rubel, who taught high school math for nine years before becoming a professor, argues that while meritocracy is commonly linked to hard work and talent, it also “functions as a tool of whiteness” because it “ignores systemic barriers and institutional structures that prevent opportunity and success.”

Color-blindness, too, can be an issue for math teachers, according to Rubel, who asserts that “Teachers who claim color-blindness—that is, they claim to not notice the race of their students—are, in effect, refusing to acknowledge the impact of enduring racial stratification on students and their families.

“By claiming not to notice, the teacher is saying that she is dismissing one of the most salient features of the child’s identity and that she does not account for it in her curricular planning and instruction,” Rubel adds, citing education theorist Gloria Ladson-Billings.

Even math teachers who acknowledge race, such as those who indicate that they “can’t relate” in certain ways to students who are of a different race, are called out in Rubel’s paper.

If math teachers notice racial differences between themselves and their students, Rubel elaborates, “those differences are typically cast in terms of deficit constructions about students, their places, and their families.”

To mediate this, Rubel recommends that math teachers incorporate more social justice issues into math lessons, but warns that even “teaching for social justice” can be a “tool of whiteness” if teachers are not sufficiently attuned to the experiences of minority students.

This is because even social justice-minded professors may inadvertently hold the “belief that effort is always rewarded, [which corresponds] to various tools of whiteness, like the myths of meritocracy and colorblindness,” Rubel writes.

Campus Reform reached out to Rubel for comment, but did not receive a response in time for publication.
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-...ofessor-claims
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2018, 02:50 PM   #220
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

William Cooper : Communist Takeover of The Democrat Party

__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:00 AM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.