Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > Health / Natural Healing / Therapies / Nutrition

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 30-09-2018, 09:38 PM   #661
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 26,021
Likes: 13,353 (7,689 Posts)
Default

How You’re Being Chemically Castrated By These Everyday Products
By Peter De Boer - September 29, 2018


In Julius Caesars ‘The Gallic Wars’ he writes:

“The Belgae (tribe) are the bravest because they are the furthest from civilization (..) and merchants least (..) import those things which tend to effeminate the mind”.

In other words, absent the soft luxuries of the city, men were what men were supposed to be. Hard to conquer. They could defend their own and do it well.

Is it safe to say that today most of society is soft, servile and without grit?

Is our civilization sinking into the ash heap of history?

Have we cucked ourselves into oblivion?

Let’s explore a bit of the why and how of where we are, and what you can do about it.

Females are, bless them, the default of the species. In many ways, they are tougher and more resilient than men. But it’s like comparing apples and oranges. Neither is “better” than or equal to the other.

In the end – its balance that matters. Men and women complement each other perfectly. A million years of evolution has written that balance into our DNA.

While the female carries child, the male is the defense mechanism of the species. We’re meant to stand between danger and the vulnerable. It is our inherent duty, and ignoring that duty makes us lesser men.

This is what we’re designed for. You intuit this. Deep down you’re called to rise. To protect your family, your ideals, your tribe.

Otherwise, deserters wouldn’t be known (universally) as cowards. And there isn’t much worse than a yellow-bellied coward.

If you were to warp men into women, how long will women last in the cross-hairs of the predator? If they had any chance of lasting at all they’d have to adopt masculine characteristics.

I’m not trying to offend the ladies. But it should be obvious to them that in the realm of brute force, they (by and large) can’t compete. Just ask the nearest ISIS sex slave.

Go back to Caesar and his wars in Gaul. If Caesar had the option of poisoning the water and weakening the Belgae, would he have?

Today’s conquerors employ armies of Technocrats. They wear lab coats instead of bulletproof vests. They’re armed with the scientific method.

The terrain they study is us – biological, psychological, social. Undermining our natural resistance to tyranny is their manifesto.

And like all psychos worth their salt, they want to make us love their tyranny.

“An efficient totalitarian state would… control a population who did not have to be coerced, because they love their servitude.” – Aldous Huxley.

Cities are the perfect laboratories. The best at producing weak people.

Very little physicality and enough comfort to neuter. Combine that with an unhealthy obsession with fashion and the worship of image. Then top that off with a chemical bath the likes of which the world has never seen.

70 years subject to a chemical barrage that’s mutated us into soft, feckless, preening pansies.

Looking for evidence? How about this – in the last 40 years sperm counts in the West have fallen by 60%.

60%. In 40 years, men have become less than half of what they used to be. The evidence is everywhere.

“Dozens of species – including polar bears, fish, bald eagles, otters and whales – are suffering. According to the environmental group ChemTrust.“

Testosterone levels are dropping alongside sperm count by a reported 1-2% per year since 1987.

Testosterone is the basis for masculinity. Mental well being, confidence and general health are all affected by low T levels.

In other words, for you to be a healthy, happy and vibrant man, you need to bolster your testosterone levels.

Low T levels result in depression, fatigue, weight gain and more. If you are having issues with these, have your T levels checked

Reuters reports that “It’s likely (..) environmental exposure is responsible for the testosterone decline.”

So what is it in the environment that’s doing this?

And is there any evidence to support deliberate machinations?

We know these kinds of fertility blockers were on the menu.

Planned Parenthoods Memorandum to Bernard Berelson by Frederick Jaffe in 1969 suggested;

“Fertility control agents in water supply… Compulsory sterilization… Altering image of ideal family size… discouraging tax incentives for children” and more.

Further, we have Obama’s Science and Tech Czar, John P. Holdren. He wrote in Ecoscience (1977) that “Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods” as an option. He adds that would “pose some very difficult political, legal, and social questions”.

No doubt.

Then there’s Ethinylestradiol, one of the main ingredients in birth control pills. This enters the waterways through our toilets, then back into the water supply and our bodies. Side effects in men include feminization and infertility.

The military at one point even considered dosing Hitler with female estrogens. The aim was to make him docile and more feminine.

Sterilization is, and has been, in action around the world for a long time.

Mass Sterilization in Kenya through the UN’s tetanus vaccine.

Canada’s coerced sterilization of First Nation Women.

Forced Sterilization of Women in Uzbekistan.

Australia forces sterilization of disabled women.

The history of sterilization is long and brutal.

And you are the current target.

But the same trend of low sperm and testosterone was not seen in human populations in other parts of the world.

Could it be partly because there isn’t a Burger King on every corner in Islamabad or Timbuktu?

Do so-called 3rd worlders consume anywhere near the amount of fast food as us? Fast food packaging is full of phthalates which cause infertility.

Just another one of the many threats we face.

Are we surprised then, when a recent migrant from the unaffected territories says “We grab your women, you can’t do anything. Your men have no balls!”

Is it any surprise that we just bend over and take such abuse? He nails it – we have no balls. In the literal sense, our balls, in general, are 60% less effective than his.

We are in the midst of the chemical-industrial age, and its complex is as severe as the military sort. Instead of killing all the men, they wipe us out by stealth. By removing what makes us men.

In light of this information, isn’t it obvious how we became so weak as a people?

Look around you. Chances are there is something poisoning you within arms reach.

Food containers- Bisphenol A – Estrogen mimic, gender bending.

Fast-food packaging, pizza boxes – PFAs (bad)

Shower curtains – Phthalates – gender bending

Perfume, anything with ‘Fragrance’ – Phthalates – gender bending

Wall Paint with phthalates – gender bending

Air fresheners, scented candles – phthalates

Plastics with recycling codes 2,4,5 – phthalates, bisphenol A

Dashboards in cars, especially heated by sun – phthalates (massive)

Almost half of all canned foods – Bisphenol A

Couches and mattresses – polybrominated diphenyl ethers

Dental Fillings – Bisphenol A

Eating Out – 41% higher Phthalate levels on average

Receipts from purchases – Bisphenola A through skin contact

Silent and incremental in nature, your life force is sapped from you. This is how you are being slowly, chemically castrated.

Unless you’re 100% clued in to what you’re putting IN or ON your body, avoid it! Spread this information! Your civilization depends on you!
https://www.thedailybell.com/all-art...lly-castrated/
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2018, 11:53 AM   #662
farros
Senior Member
 
farros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,400
Likes: 486 (189 Posts)
Default

All of the above can be counteracted by LIFTING.

Buy a bench / barbell and perform consistent squats, deadlifts and benchpresses and you'll keep your T levels high and defend yourself from being turned into an emasculated soyboy. It's really that simple.

Lift, cold showers, nofap, noporn, camping in the wild and learning some survival and bushcraft, and theredpill -

https://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/
__________________
My Youtube Channel - Raw foods, healthy living, truth ramblings, music.
Red Ice Radio - If you're not listening to Red Ice, you're not getting it.
Health Essentials - Full movie. Everything you need to know about health.

Last edited by farros; 01-10-2018 at 11:55 AM.
Likes: (1)
farros is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2018, 03:36 PM   #663
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 26,021
Likes: 13,353 (7,689 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by farros View Post
Lift, cold showers, nofap, noporn, camping in the wild and learning some survival and bushcraft, and theredpill -
sure...exercise, healthy amounts of regular sleep, learning skills etc are all important but so is knowing which foodstuffs and packaging and other objects and chemicals are harmful to health so that a person can then navigate their way through this toxic wasteland that the eugenicists behind the mega-corporations have created for the masses to live in
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2018, 08:52 PM   #664
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 26,021
Likes: 13,353 (7,689 Posts)
Default

Undercover academics expose PC madness within Education
By Jamie Busby
12 hours ago

Last year, three US university scholars embarked on a mission with the objective of revealing corruption in the education system, specifically in the field of Humanities.

The tricksters in question were mathematician James Lindsay, 'Areo Magazine' editor Helen Pluckrose and Portland State University assistant philosophy professor Peter Boghossian.

It's important to note that all three consider themselves to be left-wing, this was not a hatchet-job attempted by the far-right.

They truly believe that the study of race, gender and sexuality are important, but they were concerned with how they are being studied in the current culture where only specific conclusions are allowed. For example, studies examining "being white" or masculinity must show that they are problematic.

In order to do this, they submitted faux-academic papers to leading social science journals to see if they would be accepted. They coined the phrase "Grievance studies" and explained that their intentions were to root out oppression based on identity.

One of the topics suggested that dog walking parks were "rape-condoning spaces". It stated that men were intrinsically prone to sexual violence and bigotry. They used the example that "dog humping" incidents were blatant evidence of rape-culture in men.

It was published by the journal 'Gender, Place & Culture' and officially honoured as "excellent scholarship"... Though the reviewers did express concerns as to whether the researchers had respected the dog's privacy while inspecting their genitals during such "dog humping incidents"...

'Gender, Place & Culture' actually recognised their work as one of 12 leading pieces of "Feminist geography" for it's 25th anniversary. That is until they discovered the ruse and removed it from their scholarly record.

Hitler

Another study they conducted was basically a simple rewriting of a section of "Mein Kampf" by Adolf Hitler. They gave it a feminist slant and it was accepted and published by the feminist journal "Affilia: Journal of women and social work".

A reviewer from Affilia wrote “This is an interesting paper seeking to further the aims of inclusive feminism by attending to the issue of allyship/solidarity”. Furthermore, the editors of Affilia made a statement commenting on how the study did not "espouse racism, anti-semitism or fascism." Maybe Hitler was just misunderstood?...

"Breastaurants"

This hybrid word was a new one on me but it's meaning soon became clear. This particular study claimed that men like eating at breastaurants such as "Hooters" because they enjoyed ordering scantily clad women around.

Their study included the following statement; “For instance, counselors could interrogate men (or their partners) about whether they frequent breastaurants and contextualize these issues in terms of breastaurant masculinity as a possible avenue toward remediation.”

I believe that even after several readings, the fact that this comment doesn't seem to make total sense was done on purpose. Either that or I'm just missing the point... It was accepted nonetheless.

Rambling nonsense

Another study that was submitted was called "Moon meetings". It was written from the assumed perspective of a bitter, divorced feminist and purposefully had no clear premise.

They wanted to find out if a journal would accept blatant "rambling nonsense" so long as the study defended women and was, for all intents and purposes, anti-men.

This particular article received great interest which became the downfall of the whole experiment. Larger publications began investigating the alias that was responsible for this literary masterpiece and exposed the author, "Helen Wilson", the alias used by Helen Pluckrose.

What's more, these publications also investigated the fictional institution they had created for the operation; the Portland Ungendering Research Initiative (PURI).

Of course, they found both were fake and our three intrepid hoaxers were rumbled. But not before they had submitted 20 articles to various journals, with 7 being accepted and published. That's an incredibly high success rate, especially when you bear in mind what they were up to.

Consequences

Lindsay, Pluckrose and Boghossian said they "hope the project will make universities review theory-based studies and the humanities". However, the repercussions for them with regards to their positions within their respective establishments remain unclear.

The fields targeted by this experiment clearly show that the system deems objective truth as secondary to social grievances. How this deeply-ingrained culture can be transformed back to something remotely sensible is anyone's guess.

The three involved have put their careers on the line to demonstrate what we already knew. But they have exposed it as a bigger scam than we perhaps realised previously.

At least we now know that this area of academia blatantly needs an overhaul; as an education problem, it is a root cause of the associated social problems.

Contact me by email: [email protected]
https://www.davidicke.com/article/49...thin-education
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2018, 08:32 PM   #665
grimstock
Premier Subscribers
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 2,023
Likes: 1,014 (619 Posts)
Default

What is Wrong with Men These Days - Mark Passio

Likes: (1)
grimstock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2018, 09:08 AM   #666
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 26,021
Likes: 13,353 (7,689 Posts)
Default

Kanye west says that the democrats destroy families, drive the man out of the home and encourage dependency on the state

lets face it the SMART grid neo-marxist state IS the new plantation

Tucker Carlson Tonight 10/11/18 | Fox News Today | October 11, 2018

iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-10-2018, 03:06 PM   #667
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 26,021
Likes: 13,353 (7,689 Posts)
Default

High School Girls Admitted to Making False Sexual Assault Accusations Against a Male Student Because They ‘Just Don’t Like Him’
Lawyer says his client "was basically being tortured in school by the other students."

Robby Soave|Oct. 17, 2018 12:30 pm

Seneca Valley School District in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania is facing a lawsuit from a former male student who was forced out of school—and investigated for sexual assault—due to a series of false accusations made by female students.

The girls—dubbed "mean girls" in the lawsuit, a reference to the 2004 Lindsay Lohan film—admitted on tape that they made up the assault story. One said, "I just don't like him" and "[I] would do anything to get him expelled," according to The Toronto Sun.

The false allegations were life-derailing for the accused, who is referred to as "T.F." in the lawsuit. On October 3, 2017, one of the girls told other students that T.F. had sexually assaulted her at a pool; a Seneca Valley guidance counselor overheard the accusation, and reported it to Childline, the state's child abuse prevention agency, as required by law. T.F. was swiftly charged with indecent assault and harassment, and received six months of probation as part of a plea deal.

Months later, in March of 2018, T.F. was again falsely accused, according to the lawsuit. Another girl invited him over to a house party; a few days later, she told the school guidance counselor that T.F. had broken into her home and sexually assaulted her. The lawsuit claims she was coached by T.F.'s first accuser. As a result of this accusation, T.F. was charged with assault and criminal trespassing. He was removed from school in leg and wrist shackles, and spent 9 days in juvenile detention.

The lawsuit elaborates on a number of other indignities T.F. suffered:

He was released on house arrest on April 18, 2018, with an ankle monitor, and specific instructions from [Juvenile Probation Officer] Michael Trego that he could not tell people about the ankle device, and he could not wear shorts or other clothing that revealed the ankle device, even though it was during some of the hottest days of summer. He was not permitted to have any visitors, phone, or internet access, and could not leave the house except for therapy, which he requires to deal with the psychological trauma he suffered, and to attend church. After 28 days, he was allowed outside the house only to mow his lawn, which he had to do in long pants regardless of the temperature. He was unable to play during most of the high school baseball season and was told by the Athletic Director that she was not sure he could play baseball because every time he was wearing a Seneca Valley jersey, he was representing the school. T.F. was unable to play baseball or work at his summer jobs for part of the summer.

By the end of the summer, the conspiracy against T.F. was unmasked: other students came forward with Snapchat messages that contradicted the claims of the "mean girls," who eventually admitted to lying. All charges against T.F. were dropped.

But T.F.'s family is understandably distraught that the girls have suffered no consequences: neither the police nor the school district have taken any action against them, according to the lawsuit. And so the family is pursuing legal action against the girls' parents, the school district, and the district attorney.
https://reason.com/blog/2018/10/17/s...GS_Nz6xIPLqxEA
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-10-2018, 03:28 PM   #668
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 26,021
Likes: 13,353 (7,689 Posts)
Default

The War On Men & Women - David Icke

iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-11-2018, 10:35 PM   #669
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 26,021
Likes: 13,353 (7,689 Posts)
Default

The False Feminine
Soren Dreier
6 days ago

The feminine spirit is such a beautiful thing, so why are a lot of women abusing it to a degree where the kindest thing to do is to label them as: A very stubborn and dedicated bunch of hyenas.

Seems like women really do not need the ‘degrading’ masculine in order to assassinate the divine qualities that would define the feminine spirit.
In the way that they conduct themselves; nasty, angry, passive aggressive, openly aggressive and what have we, they degrade it and themselves, hiding behind that same feminine spirit as a tool for self-victimization every time they feel somebody stepping on their most feminine toes.

I will not go into defining the feminine spirit in this post, since I have done that enough. What I will address is the misunderstanding and the cowardice that urges women to take the feminine spirit hostage in their attempt to feeling entitled to it by default.

In the big society we have seen that happen with the election in America. Men and women really said, really wrote, really argued that Hillary should be elected on one account, and one account only: That she is a woman.

I will not go into what else Hillary is here, since it is not a political post. But, isn’t that just her gender? A woman, in this case Hillary, and the ‘woman’ argument is not a matter of the feminine, Hillary couldn’t be further from it, but nothing more than a hollow gender referral. I mean, why vote for a man - just because his gender is male?

So I or anybody else should vote for The Woman? Only that? No matter how far in mileage they are from the feminine, while they mirror the ‘Masculine’ system that these women so badly want on its own Masculine terms: For the power, the need to control others, and their need to impose their will on others?

It’s obvious, that what you get by voting a Woman, just for the sake of gender, into power, is in fact voting for the Masculine. And it would very much be an even more rigid version of that, since the Woman: Needs to prove that she can act like a man.

Sad dynamics, people, sad dynamics.

Madonna leading a protests against the defeat of Hillary. Madonna is just very fine example, of all that the feminine spirit is absolutely not. Attitudes adopted from hard core porn in public display – doesn’t really radiate the feminine spirit does it? The Whore of Babylon.

This world is so full of mirrors, isn’t it – mirrors that backfire like a boomerang. And they call Trump ( He is merely their mirror) vulgar. It’s a joke. I wrote in an earlier post that Hillary just plain hated the ordinary American. Later that was confirmed in an email leak.

Going from the Big World, let’s dive into the world of spirituality, where the same mechanics unfold. Women being downright nasty and abusive, gossiping, hatefully conducting themselves under cover of the feminine spirit.

Saying to both women and men, as granted by a misunderstood epiphany of: I am feminine, so I am entitled to be mean all of a sudden and if you do not take my abuse and you put of a fight against me: you are degrading the feminine. WTF?

No silly, you have no idea of the feminine inside you still, even though you bought into some pep talk about feminine warrior hood, the divinity of the feminine and the Goddess and Goddesses. You are still caught in your gender and being born as a female doesn’t give you the right to wave the Divine Feminine around just because people disagree, since it is not a right given, but something you have to work for. Like all of us, it is called: Get Real.

First in the context of finding the feminine inside you, and later going through the ‘kindness mistaken for weakness’ matrix, and after that and it is a crucial vortex that we step out of gender and treat each other as persons, seeing beyond gender and treating each other as equals.

What they do is still cling to the gender agenda in order to hold you down and seek power and control over you while crying their little petty self-victimizing tears all sniffling: You should not treat me this way because; I am the manifestation of the feminine spirit.

No you are not, and I will fight for my right to treat you as a person, because you are damn wrong, abusive, and frankly, you are destroying everything that the Divine Feminine is standing for and the really sad thing is: You cannot see it.

What often happens in New Age is that the Idea, of the feminine is still so far out of reach for women who conduct themselves in this way. It is used as a sugar-coating to hide anger, need for revenge, inferiority and the list is long, and that sugar-coating is really sticky and clingy and hard to get rid of.

It is often said that: The World is a Stage. If we give in to that we have to perceive ourselves as actors. It is time to stop acting and get real.

It is often said that this world is a game, and we have to play our part. I do not believe in that. We are not actors and it is not a game.

It's bloody 3D reality and go fight for your right to embed that beautiful feminine spirit and own it, knowing that the masculine also has the same inside battle: To find the true source of The Spirit embedded in them via their gender. The gender alone means nothing, the gender is irrelevant.

The true feminine spirit and the true masculine spirit are not Irrelevant, since they will save this world. The inside warrior hood we have to pull to penetrate the veils within that uncover the treasures of the Sacred Feminine should be plenty without taking it to the exterior.

When the outside world sees that you are well embedded in that Feminine spirit, you will not use the outside world for an excuse to misconduct yourself, since it will not trespass on your boundaries.

And the true feminine spirit can be very fierce, make no mistake about that. It doesn’t need any more confused, self-perceived Goddesses in a New Age Classic outfit to dilute it. Get real – it is not a show, a game, a stage, and spirituality is still not a competitive sport.

Sometimes spirituality is ‘just’ a matter of Self-conduct.

Sometimes that is all it is. And should be.

© 2018 Soren Dreier
https://www.davidicke.com/article/50...false-feminine
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-11-2018, 11:49 AM   #670
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 26,021
Likes: 13,353 (7,689 Posts)
Default

Men may have been wrongly jailed because of withheld evidence, head of CPS concedes
By Charles Hymas, Home Affairs Editor
13 November 2018 • 10:47am

More men could have been wrongly jailed for sex offences because vital evidence was withheld from their lawyers, the new head of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) indicated yesterday.

Max Hill refused to rule out the possibility in contrast to his predecessor Alison Saunders who previously stated there were not any further cases.

Asked if he could guarantee there were no innocent people in prison because of the prosecution failures, Max Hill said: "It is impossible for me to know.”

A review of more than 3,600 cases launched earlier this year after a number of rape cases collapsed because of the prosecution or police failure to pass information to defence teams found problems with 47 cases with 14 defendants in custody at the time.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...-cps-concedes/
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-11-2018, 08:27 PM   #671
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 26,021
Likes: 13,353 (7,689 Posts)
Default

You Can Have Transgenderism Or Feminism, But You Can’t Have Both
Last Thursday, feminist writer and podcaster Meghan Murphy tweeted her observation that “men aren’t women.” Twitter promptly suspended Murphy's account for “hate speech.”

One pities Murphy, a self-proclaimed leftist and feminist, as she experiences the sort of targeting and censorship that conservatives undergo at the hands of Big Tech on a daily basis. And yet conservatives cannot help feel a tinge of schadenfreude as the Left’s ideological chickens come home to roost. Murphy maintains that transgender ideology, which considers gender to be fluid and socially constructed, undermines feminism, which advocates the advancement of women, a real and essential gender category. Yet the roots of this new censorious, anti-woman ideology lie in feminism itself.
While First Wave feminists of the 18th and 19th centuries such as Mary Wollstonecraft and Elizabeth Cady Stanton acknowledged and celebrated differences between the sexes, by the 1960s radical feminists of the Second Wave like Shulamith Firestone rejected the complementarity of the sexes and sought instead to deconstruct gender altogether. In this extreme view, sexual difference necessarily impedes sexual parity, and therefore no distinction between men and women may be tolerated. Now that premise threatens to destroy the very feminist ideology that begot it.
The Left can have transgenderism or feminism, but it can’t have both. Either men cannot be women or there is not such thing as a woman. Either man and woman are distinct categories, or, to quote Planned Parenthood, “some men have a uterus.” If some men have a uterus—that is, if some men are women—then what exactly is a woman? If there is no categorical distinction between man and woman—that is, if there is no real difference between the sexes—then what precisely is “feminism”?
Even the targeting and censorship that Murphy now decries finds its roots in the Second Wave of the feminist movement, which adopted the slogan “the personal is political,” taken from the title of an essay by feminist writer Carol Hanisch. That obliteration of the distinction between public and private action, essential to liberal society, coarsened the character of political activism and encouraged a politics of personal destruction. It also set leftism on its present course of radical subjectivism that prioritizes feeling over fact, “one’s truth” over the truth, and justifies the censorship of opinions deemed “triggering,” “unsafe,” or hateful by redefining speech as violence.
Meghan Murphy is right to acknowledge that men are not women. She's also right to fear the consequences of a politics this personal. Conservatives have long known these simple truths. Now leftist feminists such as Murphy face a hard choice: ally with conservatives, who support free speech and insist that “facts don’t care about your feelings,” or persist with a Left that would annihilate feminism altogether.
http://www.stationgossip.com/2018/11...-feminism.html
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-11-2018, 08:51 PM   #672
fairyprincess
Senior Member
 
fairyprincess's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: The city at the edge of the world
Posts: 12,525
Likes: 2,439 (1,345 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iamawaveofthesea View Post
You Can Have Transgenderism Or Feminism, But You Can’t Have Both
Last Thursday, feminist writer and podcaster Meghan Murphy tweeted her observation that “men aren’t women.” Twitter promptly suspended Murphy's account for “hate speech.”

One pities Murphy, a self-proclaimed leftist and feminist, as she experiences the sort of targeting and censorship that conservatives undergo at the hands of Big Tech on a daily basis. And yet conservatives cannot help feel a tinge of schadenfreude as the Left’s ideological chickens come home to roost. Murphy maintains that transgender ideology, which considers gender to be fluid and socially constructed, undermines feminism, which advocates the advancement of women, a real and essential gender category. Yet the roots of this new censorious, anti-woman ideology lie in feminism itself.
While First Wave feminists of the 18th and 19th centuries such as Mary Wollstonecraft and Elizabeth Cady Stanton acknowledged and celebrated differences between the sexes, by the 1960s radical feminists of the Second Wave like Shulamith Firestone rejected the complementarity of the sexes and sought instead to deconstruct gender altogether. In this extreme view, sexual difference necessarily impedes sexual parity, and therefore no distinction between men and women may be tolerated. Now that premise threatens to destroy the very feminist ideology that begot it.
The Left can have transgenderism or feminism, but it can’t have both. Either men cannot be women or there is not such thing as a woman. Either man and woman are distinct categories, or, to quote Planned Parenthood, “some men have a uterus.” If some men have a uterus—that is, if some men are women—then what exactly is a woman? If there is no categorical distinction between man and woman—that is, if there is no real difference between the sexes—then what precisely is “feminism”?
Even the targeting and censorship that Murphy now decries finds its roots in the Second Wave of the feminist movement, which adopted the slogan “the personal is political,” taken from the title of an essay by feminist writer Carol Hanisch. That obliteration of the distinction between public and private action, essential to liberal society, coarsened the character of political activism and encouraged a politics of personal destruction. It also set leftism on its present course of radical subjectivism that prioritizes feeling over fact, “one’s truth” over the truth, and justifies the censorship of opinions deemed “triggering,” “unsafe,” or hateful by redefining speech as violence.
Meghan Murphy is right to acknowledge that men are not women. She's also right to fear the consequences of a politics this personal. Conservatives have long known these simple truths. Now leftist feminists such as Murphy face a hard choice: ally with conservatives, who support free speech and insist that “facts don’t care about your feelings,” or persist with a Left that would annihilate feminism altogether.
http://www.stationgossip.com/2018/11...-feminism.html
But I'm trans AND a feminist....
__________________
"if you bring forth what is within you, what you bring forth will save you. If you do not bring forth what is within you, what you do not bring forth will destroy you." (Jesus Christ, gospel of thomas.)

Love is natural, Hate is taught....
fairyprincess is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 22-11-2018, 09:37 AM   #673
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 26,021
Likes: 13,353 (7,689 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fairyprincess View Post
But I'm trans AND a feminist....
I'm a libertarian at heart which means that i believe that people should be free to do what they want to do as long as they aren't hurting others. I believe a person can dress how they like and can have their body altered if they like

I support for example muslims right to wear a blanket over them. If i decide one day that i want to walk down the street with a blanket over my head i believe i should be free to do so

I believe people can believe what they want to believe religiously but i also believe i have a right to critique their views if i disagree with them

I also believe that women should be able to do jobs if they can physically meet the requirements. I don't believe in lowering the requirements in the name of 'equality' though.

With feminism they have argued that men and women are exactly the same. I do not agree with that. Women and men are biologically built differently. Women have been built with the biological capacity to birth and suckle young.

Men as a rule when they are not being affected by feminising environmental factors such as certain chemicals are as a rule bigger and stronger than women.

These two biological facts have largely shaped the societal roles of the genders throughout history

I also believe that as a general rule men tend to be orientated more towards things while women tend to be more orientated towards people. I don't think that is a cultural / 'social' construct. I believe it has roots in biology and in our evolution where men have had the role of hunter and women managed the camp and the children

Its my belief that in the past women would have held a dominant role in the organisation and running of community events and customs excepting of course the male rites of passage. I believe that this is reflected today where it is usually women most orientated BY THEIR OWN CHOICE towards events like birthdays and festivals like christmas. I think that judeo-christian influence from the levant has usurped this female role to some extent in the community setting but not entirely and definately not in the home

I believe that this represents a soft power and i believe women have always wielded soft power. I don't agree with the modern feminist theory that women have been powerless victims throughout history. My view is that women have been active and influential in human society throughout history and have played a role that is in its own way every bit as important as that of mens. I think it is largely ignored however by a history that focusses myopically on hard power events like battles and invasions.

I think women have traditionally been the glue that binds society together which for someone who believes society is important is high praise. I don't just value womens role in society as birthers and nurturers of young i also see them as central to the functioning of the family and of society and whats more i also see them as a positive force on men, when they are not warring against them.

That IS power. There IS power in that. Not the hard power of crushing people that is so idealised by the media but another vital form of power without which the species begins to fail.

In recent times people who have an agenda to force society to fail so that a new form of society can be imposed where those people wield total control over all men, women and children have begun to deny this feminine power and instead claim that the only power that is important in society is masculine hard power. This then imbalances society and causes it to fragment which is what those people want so that they can justify a larger role of their technocratic state in peoples lives to begin replacing the role of the mother and father and of community itself.

These people have claimed there is no difference between men and women which has then led to some people claiming that if there is no difference between men and women then men can be women and women can be men

If feminism demands certain things for biological women upon the argument that there is no difference between men and women then it must logically concede to the trans lobby that men therefore can be women and occupy womens spaces

They must either deny that men and women are the same therefore denying male access to female spaces or accept they are the same and accept men into female spaces

Time to choose: are men and women different or aren't they?
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 22-11-2018 at 09:55 AM.
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-11-2018, 08:35 PM   #674
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 26,021
Likes: 13,353 (7,689 Posts)
Default

Marriage dying. Less sex. More loneliness. Society dying.
November 26, 2018 by IWB

by Fabius Maximus

Summary: The results of fourth wave feminism begin to appear. Marriage is dying, people are living isolated lonely lives. The stress on America society will be immense as these trends continue.

“The sexual revolution, however, wanted men and women to get together bodily, while feminism wanted them to be able easily to get along separately.”
— Allan Bloom in Closing of the American Mind (1987). Feminism won.

Less sex in the new age

Three waves of feminism have restructured gender relations in the US, with changes whose effects yet to be seen. Especially fourth wave feminism, women’s pursuit of dominance over men. Marriage rates are falling for all ages. Cohabitation rates have risen, but not enough to offset the decline. Since most sex occurs in these relationships, people are having less sex. See the data. Such as this graphic from “Trends in the Prevalence of Sexual Behaviors: 1991-2017” by the CDC (click to enlarge.)

It is not just teens. For more of the same, but more disturbing, see “Trends and Patterns of Sexual Behaviors Among Adolescents and Adults Aged 14 to 59 Years, United States” by Gui Liu et al. in Sexually Transmitted Diseases, January 2015 “The sexual behavior trends shown in our analyses are similar to those found in other high-income countries such as the United Kingdom, France, and Sweden.”
Journalists see the story, but don’t understand

A decline in marriage rates and decrease in sexual activity sounds like big news. It is not, at least to American journalists. But some women have reported it, albeit with a feminist spins.

“Why Are Young People Having So Little Sex?” by Kate Julian in The Atlantic, December 2018 – “Despite the easing of taboos and the rise of hookup apps, Americans are in the midst of a sex recession.”
“Have Smartphones Destroyed a Generation?” by Jean Twenge in The Atlantic, September 2017 – “More comfortable online than out partying, post-Millennials are safer, physically, than adolescents have ever been. But they’re on the brink of a mental-health crisis.”

The writers and most of the researchers are women. Men avoid this hot zone, which offers the potential for career death by saying something deemed sexist. The women writers speak of “people” and “teens”, but they quote almost exclusively women – and discuss (with exceptions) only women’s perspectives.

This blinkered viewpoint goes further. The women, of course, don’t consider that these trends might be caused by changes in women’s behavior. For example, the number of close relationships between men and women might have declined due to a combination of obesity, careerism (women out of the dating game), and unleashed hypergamy for the remnant who are in the game (as they seek only the top 10% or 20% of men.

Buried deep in Julian’s article, an admission by women about one reason there are fewer relationships.

“I mentioned to several of the people I interviewed for this piece that I’d met my husband in an elevator, in 2001. …I was fascinated by the extent to which this prompted other women to sigh and say that they’d just love to meet someone that way. And yet quite a few of them suggested that if a random guy started talking to them in an elevator, they would be weirded out. ‘Creeper! Get away from me,’ one woman imagined thinking. ‘Anytime we’re in silence, we look at our phones,” explained her friend, nodding.’”

This did not arouse any suspicion in Julian that changes in women’s behavior might explain much of the data she reports.
Why so many people are alone

Surveys, such as this by YouGov, show that large numbers of women consider normal introductory behavior to be sexual harassment. Twenty-eight percent of young women (age 18 to 24) consider paying her a complement to be harassment; twenty-eight percent consider winking at her to be harassment. Forty-eight consider placing your hand on a woman’s lower back to be harassment. Young men deal with young women, aware that a large fraction are primed to see them as predators.

Men that show an interest in young women are often told by women that this is “pervy”, although marriages with the husband 7 to 10 years older than the wife was once commonplace. Men physically attracted by girls in the late teens – post-pubescent girls with their physical sexual cues at peak levels – are called often called “perverts.” These are all common tropes in films and TV shows, the stage on which we see the great and wise of Hollywood instruct us on proper behavior. For example, on NCIS Los Angeles Kensi often describes Deeks as a pervert for looking at or chasing women.

Now the #meToo movement is further broadening the definition of harassment, narrowing the range of acceptable approaches by men to women (sometimes requiring telepathy, since men must know in advance how women will respond). MeToo allows women to re-categorize relationships weeks, months, or even years later. Often in strange ways, such accusations by co-eds that a guy “forced” her to drink too much in a restaurant. Girls’ agency comes and goes, as needed by her.
Unlike communism, this experiment will work. Trust us!
Conclusions

We are like monkeys in the control room of a nuclear power plant, spinning the dials. We are confident that no testing or experimentation is required. Fourth wave feminism is a movement to make normal behavior into misbehavior, alienating us from our natures. It will inflect damage to society on a scale we cannot imagine today. The shift to a post-marriage – even post-relationship society – has just begun.

Bet on a lot more loneliness in America, as fewer people bond together. Since the family is the primary tie of people to society, bet a much more alienation. Since the family motivates men to work hard, expect more dropouts (the “missing men” in the job stats). Since relationships and family provide meaning to many people’s live, bet on much more use of drugs – and more deaths from drug overdoses.

We are drifting thoughtlessly to a dark future for America. But we can still change.

“It leads to the World made by Hand,
Institutions shattered, but delusions too.
Then the re-build, based on reality not wishes.”

— James Howard Kunstler, novelist and social critic. See Wikipedia and his website. Private communication, posted with his permission.
http://www.investmentwatchblog.com/m...society-dying/
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-11-2018, 11:42 AM   #675
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 26,021
Likes: 13,353 (7,689 Posts)
Default

'My escape plan was to take my own life': How more men are speaking up about being assaulted by their wives
By Cara McGoogan
28 November 2018 • 1:40pm

Paul Chivers was in casualty on a Sunday evening with a bloody towel around his head, when he decided that he had to get his wife out of their family home. Earlier that evening, his nine-year-old daughter Tess had saved his life by shouting, “Stop!” as his wife repeatedly hit him with a hairdryer, until his head had split open.

In A&E, contemplating the decade of abuse he had suffered at the hands of his wife Meena, Paul knew it needed to end. At home, Tess and Meena were asleep in a bed soaked in blood.

“People always ask me, ‘Why did you stay?’” says Paul, now 49. “My answer is always the same: because of my daughter.”

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/thin...ndation-widget
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2018, 10:19 PM   #676
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 26,021
Likes: 13,353 (7,689 Posts)
Default

Is it time for the #MenToo movement? How psychologist believes the rise of 'male bashing' could be down to the 'destructive' feminist movement

Author Bettina Arndt claimed on Sunrise that the #MeToo has gone 'far too far'
She said that the global movement has given women a license to 'destroy' men
The #MeToo hashtag went viral in 2017 as a protest against sexual harassment

By Sophie Tanno For Daily Mail Australia
Published: 01:08, 4 December 2018 | Updated: 01:08, 4 December 2018

Psychologist Bettina Arndt has claimed that the global #MeToo feminist movement has granted women a license to 'destroy' men.

The psychologist and author controversially blamed the feminist movement for throwing false accusations of rape and violence at men on Tuesday.

The author went as far as to label feminism as a 'destructive force in our society'.

Ms Arndt discussed her upcoming book '#MenToo', which she claims highlights the problems that confront men today.

She went on tell Sunrise co-hosts Samantha Armytage and Natalie Barr that feminism has 'gone off the rails' and is 'all about rules and regulations to advantage women at the expense of men.'
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...alian-men.html
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2018, 01:53 PM   #677
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 26,021
Likes: 13,353 (7,689 Posts)
Default

What America Has Done To Its Young People Is Appalling
by Tyler Durden
Tue, 12/04/2018 - 21:45

Authored by James Ostrowski via LewRockwell.com,

Critics are perhaps too quick to judge America’s young people, citing declining SAT scores, obesity, drug overdoses, addiction to smart phones, bizarre alterations of personal appearance and high rates of (alleged) mental illness. It’s just too easy to be annoyed at how some of the cashiers at the local grocery store seem unable to carry on a conversation or have chosen to mutilate their faces with pieces of metal. We are perhaps too quick to condemn the crazed behavior of young protesters in recent years without fully considering what our government, society and culture have done to these poor souls.

Let’s begin at the beginning. Forty percent of Americans are now born out of wedlock. Single parent families are associated with a long list of social maladies:

“Children who grow up with only one of their biological parents (nearly always the mother) are disadvantaged across a broad array of outcomes. . . . they are twice as likely to drop out of high school, 2.5 times as likely to become teen mothers, and 1.4 times as likely to be idle — out of school and out of work — as children who grow up with both parents. Children in one-parent families also have lower grade point averages, lower college aspirations, and poorer attendance records. As adults, they have higher rates of divorce. These patterns persist even after adjusting for differences in race, parents’ education, number of siblings, and residential location.” Sara McLanahan, “The Consequences of Single Motherhood,” American Prospect(Summer 1994).

In addition, a large number of marriages will fail. That means that close to sixty percent of children will not grow up in the classic nuclear family of the 1950’s. How much of this change is due to government policies is hard to say, however, as government grows, the traditional family shrinks. When government subsidies to single parent families increase, so do the number of such families. As Jack Kemp used to say, when you subsidize something, you get more of it. Yes, culture also plays a role but don’t forget that government can change the culture as well. Women tend to come out ahead in Family Court—they get the house, the kids and much of the man’s spare change thanks to unrealistic support formulas. This provides an incentive in marginal cases for women to seek a divorce. Increases in divorces made them more socially acceptable over time.

Even with intact families, the idyllic norm of the 1950’s, where the mother typically stayed home to take care of the kids until they reached school age and perhaps even long afterwards, has been destroyed. These days, in the typical American family, both parents work fulltime which means that a very large percentage of children are consigned to daycare. Daycare was virtually unknown in my world growing up in the 1960’s. On the working class South Buffalo street where I grew up, I don’t recall any mother with young children working full-time. The overwhelming majority were housewives while a few would get part-time jobs after the kids started school. I was not aware of any daycare centers in the neighborhood and certainly do not recall anyonewho ever attended one.

The statistics bear this out. Daycare was once unusual for the middle class, but now over two-thirds of children lack a full-time stay-at-home parent. (Source: Center for American Progress) Like single parent families, daycare carries with it a long list of undesirable likely consequences. These include “more mental and behavioral problems, more mind-altering drugs, more STDs, more obese, unhappy and institutionalized children of all ages.” Mary Eberstadt, “Home-Alone America: The Hidden Toll of Day Care, Behavioral Drugs, and Other Parent Substitutes” (2004) (A fabulous but widely-ignored book).

Thus, in the critical first five years of life, the vast majority of Americans are deprived of the obvious benefits of growing up in an intact family with the mother at home in the pre-school years. We baby boomers took this for granted. That world is gone with the wind. Why? Two main reasons: feminism and progressive big government.

Feminism encouraged women to get out of the home and out from under the alleged control of husbands who allegedly controlled the family finances. Traditional mothers were derided as “baby factories” as if working in an actual factory making widgets was somehow more edifying than nurturing human beings at home.

Second, the trend toward ever larger and more intrusive big government that started in the Progressive Era around 1916, hadn’t yet weighed down the economy to the extent that two incomes were needed to support a family in the 1950’s and 1960’s. Yet, government grows steadily under progressive ideology, and after the twin shocks of the Great Society and the Vietnam War, by the 1970’s stagflation kicked in and it became increasingly difficult to support a family with one income. Married women, whether they liked it or not or were under the sway of feminist ideology, were pushed into the labor market if only to have most of their wages seized to pay the dozens of taxes the family must pay. The take-home pay of many women is barely more than the family’s total tax bill. Ironically, “women’s lib” ended up converting women from baby factories into full-time tax livestock.

It gets worse. After five years of being raised by strangers and deprived of maternal care, 90% of American youth are compelled to attend government schools for 12-13 years. As I explained in my book, Government Schools are Bad for Your Kids,government schools are rife with crime, drugs, promiscuity, mediocre education and political propaganda.

Next comes college for about 70% of Americans. While many young people thrive in college, many others graduate with huge debt and poor job prospects and a hard left ideology poorly suited for success in life. Leftism teaches resentment of others, inculcates a victim mentality and teaches some students to hate their skin color while teaching others to blame the skin color of others for the difficulties they will face in life. Leftism does not inculcate the positive thinking, initiative, work ethic and perseverance in the face of adversity which are the hallmarks of successful people.

Finally, we send this disadvantaged group of young Americans into a very hostile job market. Here, we saddle them with their per capita share of government debt as the guarantors of the fraudulent campaign promises of dead progressive politicians such as FDR and LBJ. A good accountant could figure how this debt translates into increased per capita taxes by dividing the number of taxpayers by the annual debt service. It is perhaps $2000 per person. Next comes student loan debt, a contrivance once again of dead progressive politicians to benefit overpaid progressive and left professors and administrators. This can easily be yet another $2000 per year.

Young people are shunted into the job market because the progressive state has made starting a business extremely difficult with a bundle of taxes and regulations. The mere process of getting a job, which used to take a few days in the free market, now takes many months. Many jobs require government permission. Employers need to vet employees more carefully to avoid a plethora of costly discrimination lawsuits. Young workers’ productivity is largely eaten up by the direct and indirect effects of a myriad and taxes and regulations, often leaving workers with just enough to pay the bills but not move forward, have families or save for the future. As a result, a record number of young people are forced to move back in with their parents.

The startling message I want to convey is that modern America treats its young people abominably from birth through young adulthood. This is largely because of the direct and indirect effects of numerous destructive progressive policies. This explains the numerous problems many young people are having. They have a right to be angry but need to focus on the true cause of the overwhelming majority of these problems: progressive big government. To the young people of America, I say: take the red pill; then, don’t get mad; get even. Make life better for your own children than what progressive America foisted upon you.
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-...ople-appalling
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate
Likes: (1)
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-12-2018, 05:09 PM   #678
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 26,021
Likes: 13,353 (7,689 Posts)
Default

MEETING THE ENEMY A feminist comes to terms with the Men's Rights movement | Cassie Jaye | TEDxMarin

__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2019, 11:15 AM   #679
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 26,021
Likes: 13,353 (7,689 Posts)
Default

Depression in girls linked to higher use of social media

Research suggests link between social media use and depressive symptoms was stronger for girls compared with boys

Denis Campbell Health policy editor
Fri 4 Jan 2019 00.01 GMT
Last modified on Fri 4 Jan 2019 09.04 GMT

Girls’ much-higher rate of depression than boys is closely linked to the greater time they spend on social media, and online bullying and poor sleep are the main culprits for their low mood, new research reveals.

As many as three-quarters of 14-year-old girls who suffer from depression also have low self-esteem, are unhappy with how they look and sleep for seven hours or less each night, the study found.

“Girls, it seems, are struggling with these aspects of their lives more than boys, in some cases considerably so,” said Prof Yvonne Kelly, from University College London, who led the team behind the findings.

The results prompted renewed concern about the rapidly accumulating evidence that many more girls and young women exhibit a range of mental health problems than boys and young men, and about the damage these can cause, including self-harm and suicidal thoughts.

The study is based on interviews with almost 11,000 14-year-olds who are taking part in the Millennium Cohort Study, a major research project into children’s lives.

It found that many girls spend far more time using social media than boys, and also that they are much more likely to display signs of depression linked to their interaction on platforms such as Instagram, WhatsApp and Facebook.
https://www.theguardian.com/society/...f-social-media
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2019, 09:34 PM   #680
elpressiedente
Senior Member
 
elpressiedente's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: near beachtralia
Posts: 3,942
Likes: 220 (159 Posts)
Default

There is Soy in Everything thanks to them meat haters.
Soybeans also contains residual Monsanto Roundup that Kills the very Microbes in our Guts that require good health... Soybean have been GMO'd to be sprayed with Roundup. In 5 generations the plants are so stunted they grow less than 4 inches high.

Which is good for Monsanto business.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=az352YaZNM0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTSvLKY7HEk

Eating Soybean products is a distinction of stupidity. AND its generally labeled as "Vegetable oils" so stupid vegetables can feel happy and all Soy about it.

.

Last edited by elpressiedente; 04-01-2019 at 09:36 PM. Reason: the usual
elpressiedente is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:43 PM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.