Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > 9/11 & 7/7

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 14-02-2011, 08:35 PM   #21
whatsinaname
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,294
Likes: 993 (496 Posts)
Default

I'll be getting a copy of this at some point.

If only to lend to people I know....

They're far more likely to browse through a book you've lent them, than to go rooting through a website.
Likes: (1)
whatsinaname is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-02-2011, 11:01 PM   #22
pookzta
Member
 
pookzta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 86
Likes: 3 (3 Posts)
Default

Regardless of the opinions of the few who commented negatively about Dr. Wood's book, the fact still remains that this is literally the single most evidence-packed book regarding 9/11 to be published since it happened. It is neither based on theory nor speculation; rather, it is simply based on easily-verifiable well-referenced physical evidence, analysis and discussion of that evidence, and the inescapable conclusions that are drawn from that evidence. This book is a must-read for any person who wishes to understand the true implications of the 9/11 attacks, and why there has been such an obvious, extensive, and relentless attempt to confuse people and divert our attention away from this overwhelming sum of important evidence. The truth has been out for a long time thanks to the selfless efforts of Dr. Judy Wood and the online database she has compiled at drjudywood.com, and now it has taken a new form.

This new presentation of the evidence Dr. Wood has gathered will surely attract even more readers, which is quite exciting

BOOM to our collective future, regardless of whether or not you agree.

Peace,

-Abe

Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez
M2 Medical Student
B.S. Biology / Neurobiology
__________________
Abrahm
Spreading Psytrance & Love in the Midwest USA

Quote:
9/11 Challenge: Explain the Evidence http://pookzta.blogspot.com

Last edited by pookzta; 15-02-2011 at 04:01 AM.
Likes: (1)
pookzta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-02-2011, 02:49 AM   #23
stannrodd
Senior Member
 
stannrodd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2,301
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
the inescapable conclusions that are drawn from that evidence.
she chooses inappropriate "evidence" and designs an explanation to suit ..

Quote:
This book is a must-read for any person who wishes to understand the true implications of the 9/11 attacks, and why there has been such an obvious, extensive, and relentless attempt to confuse people and divert our attention away from this overwhelming sum of important evidence. The truth has been out for a long time thanks to the selfless efforts of Dr. Judy Wood and the online database she has compiled at drjudywood.com, and now it has taken a new form.
IMO this is exactly what Judy Wood does. (Bold Text above)

With all due respect Abe .. she has no support in the scientific thinking community and you know it.

Quote:
The truth has been out for a long time thanks to the selfless efforts of Dr. Judy Wood
If she has found this "TRUTH" you allege, then it should stand that TRUTH test. It doesn't !! QED !!

Show us where the real peer reviews of her work are, with supporting dialogue and references from those peers.

It is IMO simply a phantasmagorical idea to attract $$ from those with limited knowledge, it is a distraction not dissimilar to, but more complex than Christophera and his Concrete Core Hoax.

It is IMO drivel. See my signature !!
stannrodd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-02-2011, 10:36 AM   #24
bryan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,094
Likes: 120 (69 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stannrodd View Post
Show us where the real peer reviews of her work are, with supporting dialogue and references from those peers.
Show us where any peer reviews for the Purdue study are.
__________________
"You are nice people." - Unidentified Bulgarian girl to President Puigdemont in Brussels
bryan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-02-2011, 05:03 PM   #25
seppi
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 11
Likes: 1 (1 Post)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bryan View Post
Show us where any peer reviews for the Purdue study are.
Purdue hasn't got cronies in this thread selling a £2 ebook for 50 quid, so I think that should be in a different thread?

once again andyjohnson/abe guy would love some of my points addressed

thanks

me
seppi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-02-2011, 05:18 PM   #26
bryan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,094
Likes: 120 (69 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by seppi View Post
Purdue hasn't got cronies in this thread selling a £2 ebook for 50 quid, so I think that should be in a different thread?
Stann is/was a Purdue crony and I think his double standards should be denounced at every opportunity.
__________________
"You are nice people." - Unidentified Bulgarian girl to President Puigdemont in Brussels
Likes: (1)
bryan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-02-2011, 05:55 PM   #27
earthicastar
Senior Member
 
earthicastar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: without GPS can be difficult
Posts: 647
Likes: 1 (1 Post)
Default

just ignore these derailers arguing back and forth..
they have no clue who Judy is

Judy should charge double that for this book... someday they'll be priceless...
__________________
Legaleze Interprejester
For all goods and services, please send donations to:

earthica*star: por la familia de 'Soveran'
care of: general post
near: [Pond, California]
non domestic, without the US
Likes: (1)
earthicastar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-02-2011, 09:44 PM   #28
stannrodd
Senior Member
 
stannrodd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2,301
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bryan View Post
Stann is/was a Purdue crony and I think his double standards should be denounced at every opportunity.
Bullsh*t bryan!

I challenge you to provide an example of me ever writing about the Purdue Study .. anywhere .. on this or any other forum I have been a member !

You simply want to have a go at me, and for having an opinion about Judy Woods "work" ... so you decided to derail the thread to do it.




Quote:
Originally Posted by earthicaster
Judy should charge double that for this book... someday they'll be priceless...
In other words she should be giving it away .. worthless IMO = priceless .. but in a funny sort of way, it will be an historical document of monumental proportions and will no doubt be regarded as such in the anals of conspiracy nutters !!

Last edited by stannrodd; 17-02-2011 at 04:08 AM. Reason: additional quote and response.
stannrodd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-02-2011, 10:44 PM   #29
graflok
Senior Member
 
graflok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,101
Likes: 8 (6 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stannrodd View Post
Show us where the real peer reviews of her work are, with supporting dialogue and references from those peers.
Judy Wood has no peers in the "scientific" community because the "scientific"
community is filled with sold-out criminal mouthpieces of the corporate cabal.

Her only real peers are the few honest scientists who are courageous
enough to tell the truth regardless of consequences from the corrupt
"scientific" community and the corrupt governments that support it.

The endless whining from shills, spooks and other creeps on internet forums
about "peer review science" is pure bullshit. "Peer review" really means
acceptance by the corrupt corporate/government control system who
wants us all silent and, preferably, dead.

Peer review science has given us poison foods, poison air, poison water,
poison drugs and a host of other horrors. Peer review science is a deceit
that leads nowhere but to death for one and all.

So, take your "peer review science" and shove it up your ass, please.

Thanks.
__________________

Likes: (2)
graflok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-02-2011, 10:49 PM   #30
whatsinaname
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,294
Likes: 993 (496 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by graflok View Post
Judy Wood has no peers in the "scientific" community because the "scientific"
community is filled with sold-out criminal mouthpieces of the corporate cabal.

Her only real peers are the few honest scientists who are courageous
enough to tell the truth regardless of consequences from the corrupt
"scientific" community and the corrupt governments that support it.

The endless whining from shills, spooks and other creeps on internet forums
about "peer review science" is pure bullshit. "Peer review" really means
acceptance by the corrupt corporate/government control system who
wants us all silent and, preferably, dead.

Peer review science has given us poison foods, poison air, poison water,
poison drugs and a host of other horrors. Peer review science is a deceit
that leads nowhere but to death for one and all.

So, take your "peer review science" and shove it up your ass, please.

Thanks.
*gives round of applause*
Likes: (1)
whatsinaname is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-02-2011, 11:00 PM   #31
stannrodd
Senior Member
 
stannrodd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2,301
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Deleted double post

Last edited by stannrodd; 17-02-2011 at 11:05 PM. Reason: delete double post ??
stannrodd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-02-2011, 11:03 PM   #32
stannrodd
Senior Member
 
stannrodd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2,301
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by graflok
Judy Wood has no peers in the "scientific" community...(other garbage removed to avoid imbalanced argument)...
Exactly what I said ... duh .. !!!

Quote:
...the few honest scientists who are courageous enough to tell the truth...
Please be brave enough to inform us who these warriors of this TRUTH are.. and their credentials .. I would dearly love to investigate their expertise..


Sounds like a desperate attempt to push pseudo science at all costs .. to misinform and confuse. If you sincerely believe this tripe then you are very confused.
stannrodd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-02-2011, 11:13 PM   #33
whatsinaname
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,294
Likes: 993 (496 Posts)
Default

This book really seems to have riled some people...

Always a good sign.
Likes: (2)
whatsinaname is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-02-2011, 11:25 PM   #34
graflok
Senior Member
 
graflok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,101
Likes: 8 (6 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stannrodd View Post

Please be brave enough to inform us who these warriors of this TRUTH are.. and their credentials .. I would dearly love to investigate their expertise..
Well, that's the thing, you see, they're very few in number. Judy is one.
There are other honest scientists in other fields. I know of none besides
Judy that deal with the same issues as her.

Quote:
Sounds like a desperate attempt to push pseudo science at all costs .. to misinform and confuse. If you sincerely believe this tripe then you are very confused.
I am not desperate and it wasn't an "attempt" at anything. I'm just a little
tired of losing family and friends to the butchery and mayhem of "peer review
science." I'm also tired of the work required to find relatively healthy foods,
air and water, etc., and dealing with all the other gifts of "peer review
science."

If you are bothered by honest scientists who speak the truth despite
attacks from the establishment and from petty internet arm-chair "experts"
why not visit your local psychoanalyst for help with your stress. I under-
stand they have a variety of drugs and various other treatments of an
electrical nature created just for you by peer review science.
__________________

Likes: (1)
graflok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-02-2011, 12:17 AM   #35
stannrodd
Senior Member
 
stannrodd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2,301
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by graflok
I am not desperate and it wasn't an "attempt" at anything. I'm just a little tired of losing family and friends to the butchery and mayhem of "peer review science." I'm also tired of the work required to find relatively healthy foods, air and water, etc., and dealing with all the other gifts of "peer review science."
The comment to which you refer wasn't directed at you personally .. more so at Judy Wood.

The "peer review" concept (interrogation of the facts as presented by Judy) seems to be that if you believe it then that's OK .. whether it is actually honest science or not. Supporters of Judy Wood tend not to be scientists at all .. arm chair, retired or otherwise. Mostly they are visitors to conspiracy forum websites. Failure to accept at face value what she spouts forth seems to label one to be a sack full of snake shit.

Quote:
Originally Posted by graflok
If you are bothered by honest scientists who speak the truth despite attacks from the establishment and from petty internet arm-chair "experts" why not visit your local psychoanalyst for help with your stress. I under-stand they have a variety of drugs and various other treatments of an electrical nature created just for you by peer review science.
I am not bothered by honest science. I get pissed off with charlatan science.

As for your advice regarding drugs and psychoanalysts .. I avoid them in favour of more natural ways of healing.

Cheers graf .. you are aware she's an acid head aren't you ?? Something she has freely admitted. Raising consciousness in a scrambled brain ... OM !!
stannrodd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-02-2011, 02:20 AM   #36
graflok
Senior Member
 
graflok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,101
Likes: 8 (6 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stannrodd View Post
Supporters of Judy Wood tend not to be scientists at all .. arm chair, retired or otherwise.
Show us the data that conclusion is based on, please (You are a scientist aren't you?)

Quote:
Mostly they are visitors to conspiracy forum websites.
A group to which you belong, Einstein.

(Sorry to point that out. Hope it doesn't come as a shock. )

Quote:
Failure to accept at face value what she spouts forth seems to label one to be a sack full of snake shit.
Yet you assert that we should accept anything that "peer review science"
spouts forth. In fact you use it as a yard stick to measure the "truth" of
statements.
__________________

Likes: (2)
graflok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-02-2011, 03:02 AM   #37
stannrodd
Senior Member
 
stannrodd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2,301
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by graflok
Show us the data that conclusion is based on, please
Google Judy Wood ... see for yourself.

Quote:
(You are a scientist aren't you?)
Nope .. I find most science interesting and am highly critical of pseudo science.

I don't assert that we should accept "peer reviews" as being a Truth yardstick.

They are simply useful tools in making considered determinations.

Being a member of this forum is obvious graflok, but, I'm not a supporter of Judy Woods, (members of conspiracy forums) which you failed to include in your criticism..
stannrodd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-02-2011, 03:56 AM   #38
graflok
Senior Member
 
graflok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,101
Likes: 8 (6 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stannrodd View Post
I don't assert that we should accept "peer reviews" as being a Truth yardstick.
May I quote you on that?


Quote:
Being a member of this forum is obvious graflok, but, I'm not a supporter of Judy Woods, (members of conspiracy forums) which you failed to include in your criticism..
Yeah, we know you don't like Judy. BTW her name is Wood.
__________________


Last edited by graflok; 18-02-2011 at 04:23 AM.
Likes: (1)
graflok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-02-2011, 10:59 PM   #39
stannrodd
Senior Member
 
stannrodd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2,301
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by graflok
Yet you assert that we should accept anything that "peer review science" spouts forth. In fact you use it as a yard stick to measure the "truth" of statements.
This was your suggestion .. my reply was ..

Quote:
Originally Posted by stannrodd
I don't assert that we should accept "peer reviews" as being a Truth yardstick
I simply denied your suggestion. You can quote that if you like .. sort of like quoting yourself really isn't it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by graflok
Yeah, we know you don't like Judy. BTW her name is Wood.
I don't know Judy .. so suggesting a liking or disliking of Judy is a nebulous irrelevant comment.

I know her surname is Wood .. but having a reasonable command of the English language I would have thought you could see that the missing "understood" word was work .. as in Judy Woods (work) .. see below ..

Quote:
Originally Posted by stannrodd
Being a member of this forum is obvious graflok, but, I'm not a supporter of Judy Woods (work).....etc
You will note that I used the correct spelling in the quote below .. and others .. go check !

Quote:
Originally Posted by stannrodd
Google Judy Wood ... see for yourself.
Is that satisfactory ??

So are you finished picking natshit from the pepper ??

Stann
stannrodd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-02-2011, 12:42 AM   #40
macgyver1968
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 1,748
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

I wonder if Dr. Judy explains in her book what type of energy "dustifies" steel...and where it came from, or what was up with planes that hit the towers.
macgyver1968 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:13 PM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.