Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > New World Order / Global Government

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 15-12-2017, 04:57 PM   #221
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 23,540
Likes: 12,105 (6,908 Posts)
Default

The fake 'left' trying to overturn more taboos...

WIRED magazine now promoting cannibalism as latest left-wing trendy idea
Thursday, December 14, 2017 by: JD Heyes

Have you ever read a headline that made you do a double-take just because it sounds so outrageous there’s no way it could be true?

I’m guessing you may have done just that with the headline to this story. I know I did a double take when the editor assigned it.

But yeah, the gist of it is absolutely true: Insane liberals now think it’s ‘trendy’ to eat other people.

As noted by The Federalist Papers, it isn’t a “click-baity” thing, either. It’s the real deal.

A piece in Wired magazine posits this question: “What’s wrong with eating people?” — then goes on to extort the ‘virtues’ of doing so.

Under the category of “Food” — again, not even making this up — writer Richard Wordsworth, in his Oct. 28 piece, actually suggests that we could all “soon be dining on lab-grown celebrity canapés and lightly-seasoned chunks” of our “loved ones.”

“But is the world ready for synthesized cannibalism?”

Does he really feel its necessary to ask that question and then explore it as a viable option? Yes, apparently so — and sadly, so did Wired magazine. (Related: Lab-grown meat will never feed the world or be commercially viable.)

And amazingly, he couches this ridiculous insanity on the premise that “a juicy human burger” would be “guaranteed cruelty-free” because, in the future, human ‘meat’ will be lab-grown. So you know, “no-one gets their leg sawn off for your signature slow-cooked tagine,” and “no-one even has to die these days.”

By “no one,” do you think he’s referring to animals raised for meat?
https://www.naturalnews.com/2017-12-...endy-idea.html
__________________
I want a country i can be proud of
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-12-2017, 07:20 PM   #222
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 23,540
Likes: 12,105 (6,908 Posts)
Default

Question less: The Guardian whitewashes all criticism of Syria’s foreign-funded White Helmets
Published time: 18 Dec, 2017 17:20

The Guardian has cast aside self-awareness, seized the moral high ground (its self-proclaimed permanent base), and jumped to the defense of Syria’s ‘White Helmets,’ painting the group as victims of an “online propaganda machine.”

Journalist Olivia Solon, in an article headlined ‘White Helmets became victims of an online propaganda machine,’ is keen to make sure that any questions about the motives of the group are dismissed as a ‘counter-narrative.’ That’s what others might call the ‘other side of the story.’ In full effect is the journalistic trope of our times… RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE!

The reporter describes the group thus...

“The White Helmets, officially known as the Syria Civil Defense, is a humanitarian organization made up of 3,400 volunteers – former teachers, engineers, tailors and firefighters – who rush to pull people from the rubble when bombs rain down on Syrian civilians. They’ve been credited with saving thousands of civilians during the country’s continuing civil war.”

Even someone who eats lentils for every meal would have to admit that the passage above lacks a certain journalistic cynicism. Whether you like it or not, there are very definite questions hanging over the White Helmets – some of them are raised by Solon, but only in a mumbly, out-of-the-corner-of-the-mouth, staring-at-the-floor kind of way, before being roundly dismissed.

How can they be bad? the White Helmets starred in a movie that won an Oscar for heaven’s sake. (Of course it's not relevant, but so did Kevin Spacey).

These guys wear white helmets and surely only good guys wear white! They’ve reportedly fallen victim to the worst villain there is, Darth Vad… erm… Russian Social Media!!

“The way the Russian propaganda machine has targeted the White Helmets is a neat case study in the prevailing information wars,” Solon writes.

Indeed! Just as this article is itself a case study in lacking self-awareness, strategically balancing non-sequiturs and omissions and displaying a complete unwillingness to engage with the complexity of life, geopolitics and Syria.

I still stand by that. The white helmets received tens of millions of dollars from western govts and they constantly pushed for regime change. Screaming “Russian propaganda” isn’t an argument, it’s a means to distract from reality and smear ppl who ask questions you don’t like https://t.co/UDGvWGEOdM
— Rania Khalek (@RaniaKhalek) December 18, 2017
https://www.rt.com/uk/413551-white-h...ampaign=chrome
__________________
I want a country i can be proud of
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2018, 09:28 PM   #223
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 23,540
Likes: 12,105 (6,908 Posts)
Default

Hot Off The Press: British Anti Witch-Hunt Group expelled half its supporters
January 04, 2018
By Gilad Atzmon

When you think that British 'Left' has reached rock bottom you wake up to learn that this political comedy act has no limits.

We learned today that the ‘anti witch-hunt’ labour group LAW (Labour Against the Witch-hunt ) has expelled half of its members over ‘anti-Semitism.’

Times of Israel reports today that LAW has cut ties to Socialist Fight because of the views of its members. Socialist Fight is accused of being “supportive of controversial Israeli-born author Gilad Atzmon.”

I argue that if Israel defines itself as a Jewish State we must ask who are the Jews, what is Jewishness and what is Judaism. We should then proceed and examine Israeli politics and Jewish lobbying in the light of the above questions. I basically argue that Zionism is just one symptom of Jewish choseness. I actually identify the exact same exceptionalist tendencies in Jewish Left and in particular in Walker and Greenstein’s political act. To add to my sins, I am also responsible for the popular adage “by now, we are all Palestinians.” Like the Palestinians we are not allowed to articulate the true nature of our oppression.

No one could articulate this observation better than Jackie Walker and Tony Greenstein. In the minutes of the LAW meeting, Walker and Greenstein apparently said “Making a connection between the number of Jewish billionaires in the US or who is Jewish amongst the richest sections of society and imperialist support for Israel is anti-Semitic.”

For Walker and Greenstein pointing at a concentration of mammon and political influence as the core of Zionist power is a ‘hate crime.’ For Walker and Greenstein a principled universal socialist position based on dialectical materialism is crude ‘antisemitism.’
read full article here http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/2018...its-supporters
__________________
I want a country i can be proud of

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 04-01-2018 at 09:28 PM.
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2018, 08:55 PM   #224
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 23,540
Likes: 12,105 (6,908 Posts)
Default

Sadiq’s London: Knife Crime, Gun Crime, Theft, Burglary, Rape, Homicide all MASSIVELY Up
by Raheem Kassam2 Jan 201812244
Britain’s media celebrated in droves when London elected its first Muslim mayor, Sadiq Khan, in May 2016.

Now the cacophony caused by the “we’re not racist” backslapping has ended, the true implications of a Khan mayoralty are being realised.

In Britain’s capital over the past year, Khan presided over rises in knife crime, gun crime, theft, burglary, rape, homicide, and more. And not just by a little bit, either.

Some in the media — by which I mean basically just me — predicted Khan might be a disaster for London, but the extent to which this is true was beyond even our worst nightmares.

Parking the anecdotal evidence of Khan giving preference to genital mutilation-linked groups, and using his platform to agitate against the U.S. President, the statistics reveal a terrifying incompetence in keeping London safe — one of the mayor’s core areas of responsibility.

Data from the Mayor of London’s Police and Crime Office — led by former lobbyist-turned-Deputy Mayor Sophie Linden — reveals a sharp uptick in violent crime in Khan’s first year.

From the years 2015/16 to 2016/17, homicides in London rose by 27.1 per cent. Youth homicide jumped 70 per cent. Serious youth violence was up 19 per cent. Robbery was up 33.4 per cent, while home burglaries rose by 18.7 per cent.

Theft went up by over 10,000 incidents in a year, up 33.9 per cent, and there were more than 4,000 additional knife crime incidents under Khan than under his predecessor, a rise of 31.3 per cent.

Rape in the capital rose by 18.3 per cent, while there were 2,551 incidents of gun crime, representing a rise of 16.3 per cent on the previous year.

The Mayor has continuously blamed central government “police cuts” for the problems faced, but statistics reveal London only lost around 1,000 police officers (3 per cent) in the past year, reducing the workforce from 31,343 to 30,379.
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2018...ide-massively/
__________________
I want a country i can be proud of

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 05-01-2018 at 08:55 PM.
Likes: (1)
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2018, 02:51 PM   #225
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 23,540
Likes: 12,105 (6,908 Posts)
Default

William Cooper : Communist Takeover of The Democrat Party

__________________
I want a country i can be proud of
Likes: (1)
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-01-2018, 10:11 AM   #226
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 23,540
Likes: 12,105 (6,908 Posts)
Default

Antifa group proposes 'Law Enforcement Incineration Day'
Mitchell Gunter
South Carolina Campus Correspondent
@rMitchellGunter
on Jan 12, 2018 at 2:09 PM EDT

An Antifa student group at the University of Texas at Austin (UT Austin) has proposed that “Law Enforcement Appreciation Day” be rebranded as “Law Enforcement Incineration Day.”

“Instead of #LawEnforcementAppreciationDay how about #LawEnforcementIncinerationDay,” the group Autonomous Student Network (ASN) Austin tweeted on January 9, accompanied by a photo of a policeman engulfed in flames.

"We see the state as integral to all forms of domination. We see police as an extension of this and refuse any negotiation with the cops."

According to Time, the unidentified 41-year-old officer depicted in the photo was patrolling the streets of Paris, France on May 1, 2017—otherwise known as “May Day,” a date associated with violent protests—when he was struck by a Molotov cocktail that inflicted third-degree burns.
https://www.campusreform.org/?ID=10375
__________________
I want a country i can be proud of

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 16-01-2018 at 10:12 AM.
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-01-2018, 09:54 AM   #227
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 23,540
Likes: 12,105 (6,908 Posts)
Default

A Liberal Pillar Of The Establishment – ‘New Look’ Guardian, Old-Style Orthodoxy
Post 18 January 2018
Last Updated on 18 January 2018

As Noam Chomsky has often remarked: 'liberal bias is extremely important in a sophisticated system of propaganda.' One major news outlet that Chomsky had in mind was the New York Times, but the same applies in the UK. As a senior British intelligence official noted of the 2001 US-led invasion of Afghanistan:

'It is always helpful for governments who want to get the Guardian readers of the world on board to have a humanitarian logic.'

This suggests that respected liberal media like the New York Times and Guardian are key battlegrounds in the relentless elite efforts to control public opinion.

On January 15, the Guardian was relaunched as a tabloid with a 'new look'. Katharine Viner, the paper's editor, proclaimed in all seriousness:

'we have a special relationship with our readers. This relationship is not just about the news; it's about a shared sense of purpose and a commitment to understand and illuminate our times. We feel a deep sense of duty and responsibility to our readers to honour the trust you place in us.'

Those words - 'shared sense of purpose and commitment', 'duty', 'responsibility', 'honour', 'trust' - imply an openness to readers' comments, even to criticism; an important point to which we return below.
http://medialens.org/index.php/alert...orthodoxy.html
__________________
I want a country i can be proud of
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-01-2018, 10:57 AM   #228
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 23,540
Likes: 12,105 (6,908 Posts)
Default

Is It Time To Retire The Word "Capitalism"?
by Tyler Durden
Fri, 01/19/2018 - 10:49

Our current socio-economic system is nothing but the application of force on the many to enforce the skims, scams and privileges of the self-serving few.

I've placed the word capitalism in quotation marks to reflect the reality that this word now covers a wide spectrum of economic activities, very little of which is actually capitalism as classically defined. As I have explained here for over a decade, the U.S. economy is dominated by cartels and quasi-monopolies that are enforced by the Central State, a state-cartel system of financialized rentier skims that has no overlap with Adam Smith's free market, free enterprise concept,i.e. classical capitalism.

This is what passes for "capitalism" in modern-day America: the super-rich get super-richer, a thin slice of technocrats, speculators and entrepreneurs advance their wealth and the vast majority lose ground or stagnate:



Here's another snapshot of state-financier "capitalism" in modern-day America: the centralized organs of the state (the quasi-public Federal Reserve) creates trillions of dollars and hands the nearly free money to financiers, insiders and speculators, all of whom benefit immensely as this flood of cash pushes stocks into the stratosphere:



There are other versions of "capitalism" that are equally rapacious, all of which are iterations of crony-capitalism: gangster-capitalism, theocratic-capitalism, colonial-capitalism, and so on.

The key feature of these forms of organized pillage that mask their predatory nature by claiming to be "capitalist" is they ruthlessly suppress the three core dynamics of classical capitalism:

1. Competition

2. Open/free markets

3. Free flow of capital in all its forms (financial, social, intellectual, etc.)

The only way the few can pillage the many is if the many are denied access to competition, open markets and freely flowing capital. All the predatory, parasitic and exploitive systems that hide behind the word "capitalism" skim the wealth of the many into the hands of the few by limiting competition (cartels and monopolies such as sickcare and higher education), controlling markets (you must buy from the state-mandated cartels and monopolies) and restricting capital to insiders, financial elites and cronies of the state--three terms that describe one elite.

Once the few eliminate competition, open markets and access to capital, the many are enslaved, regardless of how many times the magic words "democracy" and "capitalism" are invoked to cover the systemic exploitation.

I propose we start calling things by their real names: state-financier systems of rentier skims, and all the other predatory, parasitic exploitive systems operated by the few at the expense of the many will no longer get the cover of the word "capitalism." They will be called what they are: exploitive, predatory, parasitic pillaging that enriches a corrupt self-serving elite that is enforced by a corrupt, self-serving state.

I propose we call free-market, free-enterprise, voluntary systems STOC: sustainable, transparent, opt-in, competition.

These dynamics are the antithesis of the state-cartel hierarchies that dominate the global economy and that function by enriching the few at the expense of the many. If a system is a sustainable, transparent, opt-in free marketplace of open competition, no elite could wrest control of the system to benefit itself at the expense of all the other participants.

I've explained why centralized hierarchies have only one possible output: soaring inequality and injustice in my books Resistance, Revolution, Liberation, Why Things Are Falling Apart, Inequality and the Collapse of Privilege and Why the Status Quo Failed and is Beyond Reform

I've sketched out an alternative way of living in my books Money and Work Unchained and A Radically Beneficial World.

If an economic/financial system isn't sustainable, transparent, opt-in, and wide open to competition, it isn't capitalism--it's a self-serving rentier skim trying to mask its predatory, rapacious reality. Remember, good ideas don't require force, and our current socio-economic system is nothing but the application of force on the many to enforce the skims, scams and privileges of the self-serving few.

It's time to retire the word "capitalism" and strip the predatory, self-serving and thoroughly corrupt elite of their phony cover.

* * *

My new book Money and Work Unchained is $9.95 for the Kindle ebook and $20 for the print edition. Read the first section for free in PDF format. If you found value in this content, please join me in seeking solutions by becoming a $1/month patron of my work via patreon.com.
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-...ord-capitalism
__________________
I want a country i can be proud of
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2018, 06:19 PM   #229
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 23,540
Likes: 12,105 (6,908 Posts)
Default

No Debate Means No Resolutions - The Decline of the 'Left'
Jaymie Icke
6 hours ago

'Firstly, let me start this article by making it very clear that I am not racist, homophobic, transphobic, a misogynist or any of the other labels that are given to people (some of whom are these things but most of whom are not) that want to have a debate and talk about Social and economic issues within their society. I live in the UK so my references will almost always come back to the UK but I’ve been fortunate enough to travel a fair amount in my life and I’ve gained some fantastic experiences from other cultures and Society’s. However, there is the major common theme.

Lack of debate – Now the left is politics or ‘Progressives’ that people associate with being ‘Liberal’ which is the last thing they are have a massive question to answer regarding this issue. If you look internationally there is a war going on, initiated by the ‘Left’ to silence anyone that doesn’t agree with them, that’s not liberal, that’s fascism. There any many issues that need to be discussed, there are difficult topics involving migration, gender and race, but in so many societies including my own you’re labelled a racist for wanting to have a debate about these issues. Now you keep telling people they’re wrong and that they cannot talk about this then what’s going to happen? People feel helpless and generally things turn to violence.

Yes, there are racist bigots in this Country and in almost every society but not everyone that voted Brexit for example is one. I voted out and I’m proud to say I did; race didn’t even come into my reasoning.

Take this example, I would be called racist by the ‘Left’ for saying this, millions of migrants have come into Europe from the Middle East in the last two years, some of whom are escaping the Western Created Wars and I’m the first person to Welcome these people and families, but the vast majority of people coming into Europe are Young Men, what do you think is going to happen when you take a vast number of people from a different culture and place them in yours? There are going to issues aren’t there? Ask the people of Germany and Sweden how they feel about this. Here’s another thing when you take a large number of people from any society including my own you’re going to have some nice people, some ok people and some extremely unpleasant people, and if we were talking about a white group of people then we would be able to have this debate but because we’re not we can’t.

Do you know what that is? Its REAL Racism. My attitude is I interact and judge someone on what they do and say, not what colour their skin is or what faith they are. Can the ‘Left’ say that? The ‘Progressives’ certainly cannot, I outlook is the true anti-racist and discriminatory attitude. But the ‘Left’ are too ignorant and arrogant to see that their actions and refusal to listen to the concerns of people whose lives are affected by these issues is the reason for the rise of the ‘Far-Right’ and the increase in ‘Populist’ politics.

People have simply had enough being told they can’t say how they feel when how they feel is largely justified. The ‘Left’ need to re-evaluate, debate and show some respect to people’s views that are different to theirs. You may not agree with everyone but respect that right to say and feel how they do. That would be a start…'
https://www.davidicke.com/article/45...s-decline-left
__________________
I want a country i can be proud of

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 08-02-2018 at 06:20 PM.
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2018, 05:24 PM   #230
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 23,540
Likes: 12,105 (6,908 Posts)
Default

'haiti has been raped by the clinton foundation'

Sunday View On richieallen.co.uk For Sunday February 11th 2018

__________________
I want a country i can be proud of
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2018, 06:38 PM   #231
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 23,540
Likes: 12,105 (6,908 Posts)
Default

Labour faces backlash for banning straight white men from attending 'equalities' conference

Labour equalities conference is only open to BAME, disabled, LGBT and women
Conservative MPs say blocking white straight, able bodied men is discrimation
Equality and Human Rights Commission is being asked to investigate the event

By Daniel Martin Policy Editor For The Daily Mail
Published: 17:04, 11 February 2018 | Updated: 17:04, 11 February 2018

Labour was blasted today for banning old, white, able-bodied straight men from an event.

The party is inviting people to apply to join an equalities conference in London next month.

An advert for the Young Labour event said that to attend, an applicant had to be under 27 and had to ‘self-define’ as ‘one or more’ of four groups.

These are BAME (black, Asian and minority ethnic), disabled, LGBT (lesbian, gay bi or trans) and women.

Tory MP Andrew Bridgen has written to the Equality and Human Rights Commission to ask them to investigate whether the entry rules added up to ‘discrimination’.

He said: ‘The Labour Party are no longer about equality or fighting against discrimination, they have been entirely taken over by identity politics and specific groups of activists.

‘They are a divisive party who want to put people into victim groups. They seem to believe that white, male heterosexuals have nothing to contribute to the subject of equalities.

‘It seems that in La La Labour land everyone is equal but some are more equal than others.’

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz56vOu8bkj
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
__________________
I want a country i can be proud of
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2018, 09:31 PM   #232
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 23,540
Likes: 12,105 (6,908 Posts)
Default

Where is the Labour outrage at the sex scandal engulfing the Left's favourite charity, Oxfam?
Tom Harris Tom Harris
12 February 2018 • 2:52pm

This is one of the worst sexism scandals yet. But Labour is slow to respond to it

If there’s one thing you can rely on the Labour Party for, it’s the championing of the female victims of male oppression and everyday sexism. The party’s MPs’ twitter feeds positively burst with condemnation of the vile behaviour of some men towards women in the workplace and beyond.

Remember the Presidents’ Club fiasco, when a crowd of entitled, wealthy fools in dinner jackets spent the evening propositioning and leering at female waitresses?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/...urite-charity/
__________________
I want a country i can be proud of

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 12-02-2018 at 09:31 PM.
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-02-2018, 02:12 PM   #233
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 23,540
Likes: 12,105 (6,908 Posts)
Default

'You're Going Insane on TV Right Now': Tucker Battles Clinton Adviser Over Michael Flynn's Russian Contacts

__________________
I want a country i can be proud of
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-02-2018, 04:50 PM   #234
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 23,540
Likes: 12,105 (6,908 Posts)
Default

Charity fronted by former Labour foreign secretary David Miliband 'hushed up 37 allegations of fraud, sex abuse and bribery'

Former Labour MP David Miliband joined the IRC after quitting politics in 2013
The International Rescue Committee was given £5.4million in taxpayers' money
Money given to the charity by the government was frozen after the allegations
By Charlie Bayliss For Mailonline
Published: 09:38, 14 February 2018 | Updated: 17:55, 14 February 2018

Government ministers froze funding to a charity led by David Miliband after it silenced 37 sex abuse, fraud and bribery allegations, it has been claimed.

The International Rescue Committee, which is headed by the former Labour foreign secretary, was given millions in taxpayers' cash before the allegations were made.

A team from the IRC was sent to probe claims of wrongdoing in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

Yet a leaked report from the Department of International Development (Dfid) shows the funding to the charity was cut after 'direct reporting of sexual harassment and fraud'.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz57CVEYBzb
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
__________________
I want a country i can be proud of
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-02-2018, 09:59 PM   #235
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 23,540
Likes: 12,105 (6,908 Posts)
Default

Jeremy Corbyn knew I was a spy and was a Cold War source, says Czech 'diplomat'
By Matthew Day, Warsaw Hayley Dixon, Bratislava Patrick Sawer
16 February 2018 • 10:00pm

The Czechoslovak secret agent who met Jeremy Corbyn during the Eighties claimed last night that the Labour leader knew he was a spy and said the MP had supplied information to the Communist regime.

Speaking for the first time since it emerged that he had met Mr Corbyn, Jan Sarkocy on Friday dismissed the suggestion that the Islington North MP believed he was simply a diplomat.

“Everybody knew that ‘diplomat’ was just a cover for spy,” he said. “It was a conscious cooperation. Diplomat and agent were the same thing.”
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018...zech-diplomat/
__________________
I want a country i can be proud of
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-02-2018, 05:46 PM   #236
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 23,540
Likes: 12,105 (6,908 Posts)
Default

Labour apparatchiks smear Black activist in “anti-Semitism” witch hunt
Asa Winstanley Lobby Watch 16 February 2018

A campaigner against racism is resisting attempts to have him expelled from the UK’s Labour Party over fabricated claims of anti-Semitism.

Marc Wadsworth faces a disciplinary hearing of party bureaucrats on 25 April, he told The Electronic Intifada, and has had to hire a lawyer.

He has launched a crowdfunding campaign to help with legal costs.

The hearing is a high-profile part of what Labour activists say is a “witch hunt” of left-wingers and critics of Israel.

The Jewish anti-Zionist and anti-racist campaigner Tony Greenstein also has a hearing on Sunday about his suspension from Labour.

The attempted expulsions of Wadsworth and Greenstein are thought by campaigners to be the prelude to a new attempt to expel former mayor of London Ken Livingstone from Labour.

In April 2016, Livingstone was suspended from Labour for a year, after having made accurate historical comments about connections between the Zionist movement and the Nazi government of 1930s Germany.

Livingstone’s suspension was then extended for a further 12 months in April 2017.

Wadsworth is a veteran anti-racist campaigner and a journalist for publications including The Voice, a newspaper for the African-Caribbean community in the UK.

https://electronicintifada.net/blogs...5041-299185473
__________________
I want a country i can be proud of
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-02-2018, 07:28 PM   #237
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 23,540
Likes: 12,105 (6,908 Posts)
Default

__________________
I want a country i can be proud of
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-02-2018, 06:42 PM   #238
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 23,540
Likes: 12,105 (6,908 Posts)
Default

Missing history: US oligarchs finance Socialism
Jon Rappoport
8 hours ago

In 1971, Gary Allen published his book, None Dare Call it Conspiracy. It quickly became an unofficial best seller.

Over the years, several million copies have been sold.

Allen’s thesis was stark: super-rich American capitalists were financing socialism. This bizarre paradox was resolved when socialism was properly understood—not as “power to the people”—but as elite power over the people. In other words, as a hoax.

These days, the socialist hoax is still unknown to most of the population:

Cloak a global power grab as progress for all of humanity.

Here, from chapter six of None Dare Call it Conspiracy, “The Rockefellers and the Reds,” is an explosive passage commenting on the period just after the Russian Revolution of 1917:

“The Rockefellers assigned their public relations agent, Ivy Lee, to sell the American public the idea that the Bolsheviks were merely misunderstood idealists who were actually kind benefactors of mankind.”

“Professor Antony Sutton of Stanford University’s Hoover Institution, notes in his highly authoritative Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development:”

“’Quite predictably…[Ivy] Lee concludes that the communist problem is merely psychological. By this time he is talking about “Russians” (not Communists) and concludes “they are all right.” He suggests the United States should not engage in propaganda; makes a plea for peaceful coexistence; and suggests the United States would find it sound policy to recognize the USSR and advance credits [give loans].’ (Antony Sutton, Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development, 1917-1930, Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace, Stanford University, Calif., 1968, p.292)”

“After the Bolshevik Revolution, Standard [Oil] of New Jersey [Rockefeller] bought 50 per cent of the Nobel’s huge Caucasus oil fields even though the property had theoretically been nationalized [by Russia]. (O’Connor, Harvey, The Empire Of Oil, Monthly Review Press, New York, 1955, p.270.)”

“In 1927, Standard Oil of New York [Rockefeller] built a refinery in Russia, thereby helping the Bolsheviks put their economy back on its feet. Professor Sutton states: ‘This was the first United States investment in Russia since the Revolution.’ (Ibid, Vol.1, p.38)”

“Shortly thereafter Standard Oil of New York and its subsidiary, Vacuum Oil Company [Rockefeller], concluded a deal to market Soviet oil in European countries and it was reported that a loan of $75,009,000 to the Bolsheviks was arranged. (National Republic, Sept.1927.)”

“…Wherever Standard Oil would go, Chase National Bank was sure to follow. (The Rockefeller’s Chase Bank was later merged with the Warburg’s Manhattan Bank to form the present Chase Manhattan Bank.) In order to rescue the Bolsheviks, who were supposedly an archenemy, the Chase National Bank was instrumental in establishing the American-Russian Chamber of Commerce in 1922. President of the Chamber was Reeve Schley, a vice-president of Chase National Bank. (Ibid, Vol.11, p.288) According to Professor Sutton: ‘In 1925, negotiations between Chase and [Russian] Prombank extended beyond the finance of raw materials and mapped out a complete program for financing Soviet raw material exports to the U. S. and imports of U. S. cotton and machinery.’ (Ibid, Vol.11, p.226) Sutton also reports that ‘Chase National Bank and the Equitable Trust Company were leaders in the Soviet credit business.’ (Ibid, p.277)”

“The Rockefeller’s Chase National Bank also was involved in selling Bolshevik bonds in the United States in 1928. Patriotic organizations denounced the Chase as an ‘international fence.’ Chase was called ‘a disgrace to America… They will go to any lengths for a few dollars profits.’ (Ibid, Vol.11, p.291) Congressman Louis McFadden, chairman of the House Banking Committee, maintained in a speech to his fellow Congressmen:”

“’The Soviet government has been given United States Treasury funds by the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks acting through the Chase Bank and the Guaranty Trust Company and other banks in New York City.”

“’Open up the books of Amtorg, the trading organization of the Soviet government in New York, and of Gostorg, the general office of the Soviet Trade Organization, and of the State Bank of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and you will be staggered to see how much American money has been taken from the United States’ Treasury for the benefit of Russia. Find out what business has been transacted for the State Bank of Soviet Russia by its correspondent, the Chase Bank of New York’. (Congressional Record, June 15, 1933.)”

“But the Rockefellers apparently were not alone in financing the Communist arm of the Insiders’ conspiracy. According to Professor Sutton ‘… there is a report in the State Department files that names Kuhn, Loeb & Co. (the long established and important financial house in New York) as the financier of the [Russians’] First Five Year Plan. See U. S. State Dept. Decimal File, 811.51/3711 and 861.50 FIVE YEAR PLAN/236.’ (Sutton, op. cit., Vol. II, p. 340n.)”

“Professor Sutton proves conclusively in his three volume history of Soviet technological development that the Soviet Union was almost literally manufactured by the U.S.A…”

“…Sutton shows that there is hardly a segment of the Soviet economy which is not a result of the transference of Western, particularly American, technology.”

“This cannot be wholly the result of accident. For fifty years the Federal Reserve-CFR-Rockefeller-lnsider crowd has advocated and carried out policies aimed at increasing the power of their satellite, the Soviet Union. Meanwhile, America spends $75 billion a year on defense to protect itself from the enemy the Insiders are building up.”

NOTE: The descendants of these bankers are now doing everything they can to build up the story that Donald Trump won the presidency by colluding with Russians. To call this an irony, in view of the above information, would be a vast understatement.

However, the motives of these men are clear: regardless of whether Trump meant to keep his promises to destroy Globalism (aka worldwide Socialism), his mere mention of Globalism as the enemy, during the presidential campaign, and his declared opposition to Globalist “free trade” treaties, was sufficient to warrant an all-out attack on him.

The whole idea of nationalism as preferable to Globalism could act as a contagious germ spreading to the people of other countries—so Trump as the face and symbol of such sentiments had to be defamed and crushed.

Through various front organizations, cutouts, dupes, brainwashed useful idiots, and violent hired thugs, that operation to crush Trump is well underway.

Again—and this point must be understood—IT DOESN’T MATTER WHETHER TRUMP EVER MEANT TO KEEP HIS PROMISE TO BURY GLOBALISM. THE MERE MENTION OF GLOBALISM AS THE ENEMY WAS AND IS SUFFICIENT TO WARRANT UNCEASING ATTACKS AGAINST HIM.

Many, many of Trump’s supporters want to see Globalism buried.

Ultimately, these supporters are the real target of the Globalists.

These millions of targets—human beings who want freedom, a return to Constitutional principles, and an end to both Globalism and American Empire—gave support to presidential candidates before Trump: Ross Perot and Ron Paul.

These “targets” aren’t going away. They understand how the American Republic was betrayed. The above evidence reveals that betrayal was a set-up, designed to prop up and rescue a system (the USSR) that was dead on arrival, a complete failure.

Elite money created Socialist Russia, sustained it, bailed it out, and propagandized it as a movement of the people.

Socialism is a movement of, by, and for the super-rich.

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.
https://www.davidicke.com/article/45...ance-socialism
__________________
I want a country i can be proud of
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-02-2018, 09:01 PM   #239
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 23,540
Likes: 12,105 (6,908 Posts)
Default

Creepy “World Government Summit” Targets America, Freedom
Written by Alex Newman
Wednesday, 21 February 2018

Top globalists, communists, and Islamists from around the globe gathered this month on the Arabian Peninsula for the World Government Summit — yes, that is the confab's real name — to push for what they called a “new world order.” More than a few speakers made clear that liberty, self-government, and the “America First” agenda were in the crosshairs.

On the other hand, Big Government, trans-humanism, and globalism were presented as the solution to basically everything, from alleged man-made “global warming” and health problems to unemployment and even hate. Aside from global governance and statism, one of the key themes of the conference was the merger of man and machine to become “cyborgs.” Artificial Intelligence and “Happiness,” directed by authorities, were also major topics.

But while critics ridiculed and slammed the scheming, and most American media outlets completely ignored it, the globalist confab has been helping to advance a planetary agenda that is completely at odds with American traditions of liberty and self-government. And the speakers, organizers, and attendees barely bothered to conceal that fact — probably in part because they knew Americans were unlikely to hear about the antics from the purveyors of “fake news” posing as “mainstream” media.

The truth was plain to see. In an official press release put out by the World Government Summit, the organizers said the event ended with “a plea for institutions to realign with the new world order.” And the speakers made that clear, too. Among those quoted in the press release, one claimed that people's expectations “need governments to develop progressive policies that can accommodate the global transition.”

Of course, “new world order” and “progressive policies” are both loaded terms that offer a strong hint about the real agenda of the forces behind the World Government Summit. “Progressive,” for instance, despite having absolutely no intrinsic relationship to progress, has become synonymous with statism, immorality, and corruption. And while the term now has a bad stench in the United States, much of the world remains oblivious to the slick marketing gimmick used to portray tyranny as modern and hip.

“New world order” has an even more troubling connotation. For decades, top globalists, including multiple U.S. presidents from both parties, have been openly and loudly demanding what they call a “new world order.” Former President George H.W. Bush defined it as one in which the United Nations would use its military forces to implement the “vision of the UN's founders.” That illustrious group included mass-murdering dictator Joseph Stalin on the Soviet side, and convicted Soviet spy Alger Hiss, who was selected to serve as the first UN secretary-general, on the U.S. side.

More recently, billionaire Rothschild protégé and self-styled “god” George Soros has been demanding a “new world order.” He said publicly that the mass-murdering Communist Chinese regime should “own” the new world order in the same way that the United States owned the previous one. Soros also claimed the murderous Chinese regime has a “better functioning government” than the United States. In Beijing, meanwhile, the dictatorship has been loudly and publicly demanding what it, too, calls a “new world order.”

World Government Summit Chairman Mohammed Abdullah Al Gergawi, who also serves as “Minister of the Future,” boasted that the summit, now in its sixth year, was a “permanent knowledge platform” for governments. “Through the World Government Summit, we seek to create new models of international cooperation,” he said, touting the agenda of "His Highness Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum.” The goal is to “prepare for the future within the framework of global efforts to achieve a common goal.”

In reality, though, The New American's William F. Jasper explained what is truly going on. “Sheikh Mohammed is merely acting as a front man for the organized one-worlders,” Jasper wrote in a 2017 article about the summit's focus on “happiness” as a governmental responsibility. “This is standard operating procedure at the UN and other international forums: have some small country or group of nations propose the pre-arranged, prepared, global agenda subplots, so it won’t appear that they are originating from the globalists in the United States, EU, and other major powers.”

Other elements of the World Government Summit agenda have been alluded to in not-so-subtle ways. Last year, for example, the globalists at the summit made headlines worldwide for gathering under a replica of the infamous “Arch of Baal.” Analysts suggested that the inclusion of the bizarre monument, which once stood in front of a pagan temple to the false god Baal to whom children were often sacrificed, was extremely significant to some of the higher-ranking globalists. It was not immediately clear whether the pagan artifact was at this year's summit.

Beyond that, the anti-American tone of the latest confab was noticed by more than a few observers. “This is a very anti-American three-day globalist summit,” reported WND, pointing to various anti-America, anti-Trump rants by celebrities and globalist bigwigs at the summit that made America the "number 1 enemy." Among them was aging celebrity turned man-made-global-warming theorist Robert DeNiro (shown above), who ridiculed his homeland, referring to it as a “backward country, a place where science once reigned and lately has been replaced by ignorance.”

Some of the high-profile speakers at the summit and their comments were also a dead giveaway about the agenda. UN World Health Organization (WHO) boss Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, an Ethiopian communist, for example, promoted government control of healthcare under the guise of providing “universal” health. In fact, he claimed that “pursuing” government healthcare “is the responsibility of every country and national government.”

For some perspective on what Tedros means by “universal healthcare,” a look at his recent comments and actions is helpful. Consider that last year, the WHO boss became the subject of global criticism and ridicule for trying to appoint genocidal Marxist dictator Robert Mugabe — infamous primarily for mass murder and destroying his once-prosperous nation — as WHO “goodwill ambassador.” According to Tedros, the reason for the honor was the dictator's “strong commitment to health” and how his regime supposedly “places universal health coverage and health promotion at the center of its policies to provide health care to all.”

Beyond promoting the government takeover and destruction of healthcare — a key goal of “progressives,” communists, and NWO globalists everywhere — a number of speakers also promoted a radical restructuring of government education to help centrally plan the economy. For instance, Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed, the “Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation” for the United Arab Emirates (UAE), called for “identifying pupils talented in computing at an early age.” New government “education” standards need to begin in “nurseries and preschools,” he said.

The Islamic sheikh, advocating an “unprecedented rethink in education,” called for a “new national strategy” that would “meet the requirements and targets of the UAE [government] in both the private and public sectors.” “We need a new system of education that looks into the future, competitiveness and the country’s economic requirements,” he continued, implying that the state would train future workers for future jobs that it believes will be needed.

Of course, that is exactly the sort of rhetoric and ideology that animated communist “education” and indoctrination systems of the past, from the Soviet Union and Cuba to China and Cambodia. But in reality, the outlandish idea that central planners could somehow predict what the future economy 20 years from now will require — and then shape “human capital” (children) for it — has been thoroughly debunked. Unfortunately, globalists around the world — at the UN, and even in the U.S. Department of Education — apparently never got the memo. Almost 90 percent of the UAE's workforce is employed by government today, Sheikh Zayed said.

In addition to the globalism and statism, the World Government Summit also promoted agendas that almost sound too fringe and outlandish to believe. Consider, for instance, the prominent role of a man with an antenna sticking out of his head touted as the world's first “cyborgist,” Neil Harbisson. With gender confusion all the rage, and being legitimized by “progressive” governments and pushed by the UN, Harbisson argued that governments must now accept that some people will identify as cyborgs and will become “part-technology, part-human.”

“I have an antenna that is implanted inside my head, which allows me to extend my perception of reality beyond the visual spectrum,” said Harbisson, co-founder of the Cyborg Society and the Transpecies Society which fight for people who “identify” as non-human. “I can sense infrared and ultraviolet, and I also have an internet connection in my head that allows me to receive colors from other parts of the world, or connect to satellites so I can send colors from space.”

Another key plank of the summit was the promotion of “Artificial Intelligence.” Unsurprisingly, the UN and the globalist establishment have already announced their intention to hijack AI technology to advance their totalitarian vision for the future, summarized neatly in the UN Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals. And already, robots programmed to regurgitate globalist talking points and praise for the UN have been paraded in front of the world as paragons of wisdom and virtue. And this is probably only the beginning.

The World Government confab received almost no coverage in establishment media outlets in the United States, despite the attendance and support of multiple prominent “journalists” and media organs. But lest the summit be dismissed as a fringe gathering of irrelevant kooks, a brief look at the 130 speakers reveals strong establishment support for the World Government agenda. Indeed, among the summit speakers was a virtual who's who of the globalist establishment and its leading shills and useful idiots.

The list included World Bank President Jim Kim; World Economic Forum (WEF) boss Klaus Schwab; International Monetary Fund (IMF) boss Christine Lagarde; UN Educational, Cultural, and Scientific chief Audrey Azoulay, a well-known socialist; World Trade Organization boss Roberto Azevedo; former Obama regulatory czar and fringe totalitarian Cass Sunstein, who infamously called for a ban on conspiracy theories; far-left Huffington Post founder Arianna Huffington; executives from Google and Facebook; pseudo-journalists and globalist propagandists such as Kenneth Cukier of The Economist and Becky Anderson of CNN; OECD boss Angel Gurria; a Chinese Communist agent serving as UN under-secretary general; education ministers, bureaucrats, CEOs, and more.

With the globalist movement increasingly dropping the mask, and the Internet making it easy to spread information, Americans have an unprecedented opportunity to derail the global-government agenda on display at the summit. Exposing globalist bigwigs using their own words and deeds is a crucial way to help. But America and liberty are in a race against time — the globalists have been hard at work for decades, while Americans slept. If the sleeping giant that is the American public wakes up, all the schemes for “world government” in the world could be easily crushed. But getting involved now in preserving and protecting liberty, self-government, and the U.S. Constitution is crucial.

Photo of Robert De Niro at World Government Summit in Dubai: AP Images

Alex Newman, a foreign correspondent for The New American, is normally based in Europe. He can be reached at [email protected]. Follow him on Twitter @ALEXNEWMAN_JOU or on Facebook.
https://www.thenewamerican.com/world...merica-freedom
__________________
I want a country i can be proud of
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-02-2018, 01:44 PM   #240
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 23,540
Likes: 12,105 (6,908 Posts)
Default

Labour expels Jewish anti-Zionist Tony Greenstein
Asa Winstanley Activism and BDS Beat 21 February 2018

The Labour Party on Sunday expelled prominent Jewish anti-Zionist Tony Greenstein, citing his allegedly abusive language and his criticism of leading pro-Israel figures in the UK’s main opposition party.

A disciplinary panel expelled Greenstein for what it claimed was online abuse.

But Greenstein disputes this and says the real reason was that he has spoken out against the Israel lobby within the Labour Party.

“I expected it,” he told The Electronic Intifada after his expulsion.

He said that he had been “overwhelmed by the number of supportive messages, so I shall be fighting from outside” and would press for membership reinstatement.

Greenstein is vice-chair of Labour Against the Witch-hunt, a group set up to combat what it calls a “witch-hunt against Corbyn supporters and critics of Israel” in the Labour Party.
https://electronicintifada.net/blogs...2d0b-299185473
__________________
I want a country i can be proud of
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:43 AM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.