Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > Exposing Child Abuse

View Poll Results: Do you believe the claims?
Yes 75 52.45%
No 44 30.77%
I don't follow these kinds of stories 5 3.50%
Undecided 19 13.29%
Voters: 143. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 22-03-2015, 05:30 PM   #10701
susan0207
Inactive
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,386
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wewillwin2016 View Post
Wich is a problem for some because she can still talk then.
exactly what talking did she do when she ran away, remind me. indeed, what talking did she do today, save reading out the names.doc that was already online?

Last edited by susan0207; 22-03-2015 at 05:32 PM.
susan0207 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-03-2015, 05:31 PM   #10702
sucheta19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 728
Likes: 10 (10 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by susan0207 View Post
ella demands: world falls in with demands. not. get real. barrister may have been trying his best but as he saw the law makes provision for enforcing law, believe it or not. the police may also have wanted to preserve evidence eg the child porn on abe's phone. you don't know. all we do know is ella and others fled.

tricky demon, tricky demon.
They said they wanted to talk to ED. Where does AC come into it? If they had evidence of child porn, then they would have said so, surely?
sucheta19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-03-2015, 05:32 PM   #10703
sucheta19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 728
Likes: 10 (10 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by susan0207 View Post
in the meantime, she betrayed her children. and the good people of hampstead.
She did her best, in all the circumstances. What would you have done in her place, after her experience of police etc.
sucheta19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-03-2015, 05:34 PM   #10704
sucheta19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 728
Likes: 10 (10 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by susan0207 View Post
exactly what talking did she do when she ran away, remind me. indeed, what talking did she do today, save reading out the names.doc that was already online?
She issued a Legal Notice under UCC law.
sucheta19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-03-2015, 05:35 PM   #10705
alf hearted
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 13,152
Likes: 109 (86 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by frase View Post
Sure you'd have stayed wouldn't you.......probably have sectioned her by now or who knows what if she had stayed.....
Suggest you start playing the ball not the man or woman as its fucking tiresome q honestly...
Ella's last video was damning......assertive, with conviction. Eye contact. Not the behaviour of someone lying or coaching....
It's ludicrous to suggest all these names are part of a hoax....
It is akin to the bill hicks sketch about Judas Priest killing all their fans....and you and your mob are clinging to it.....the best you've got...!
Pitiful.
Now why Didnt the judge mention the marks on the privates on her very detailed conclusion....???
What have these inconsiderate cunts been doing when they are accusing people of horrific crimes and naming them on the internet, thereby placing their children in danger of reprisal attacks on their homes?

Last edited by alf hearted; 22-03-2015 at 05:36 PM.
alf hearted is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-03-2015, 05:36 PM   #10706
susan0207
Inactive
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,386
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sucheta19 View Post
They said they wanted to talk to ED. Where does AC come into it? If they had evidence of child porn, then they would have said so, surely?
AC comes into it by virtue of being her partner in crime, as well as her bedfellow. you know, the person who concocted the whole thing, that's how he came into it. Are you really telling us that you think the police reveal everything they want on the doorstep? That they don't have intelligence? I mean access to intelligence, human and electronic signals technology?

Last edited by susan0207; 22-03-2015 at 05:37 PM.
susan0207 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-03-2015, 05:38 PM   #10707
nadams
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,231
Likes: 14 (10 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sucheta19 View Post
It confirms my statement - the police left as they had no warrant - otherwise they were threatening to break the door down.

The barrister asked for a warrant and when they couldn't produce one, they left.
He wasn't a barrister. A barrister would not have suggested to his client that jumping out of the window and doing a runner was the best course of action in the circumstances .

He sounded to me like he was just another head-case lay legal adviser.
nadams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-03-2015, 05:41 PM   #10708
sucheta19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 728
Likes: 10 (10 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by susan0207 View Post
AC comes into it by virtue of being her partner in crime, as well as her bedfellow. you know, the person who concocted the whole thing, that's how he came into it. Are you really telling us that you think the police reveal everything they want on the doorstep? That they don't have intelligence? I mean access to intelligence, human and electronic signals technology?
Well, he was standing outside the RCJ - they could have easily questioned him/arrested him then.
sucheta19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-03-2015, 05:43 PM   #10709
sucheta19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 728
Likes: 10 (10 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nadams View Post
He wasn't a barrister. A barrister would not have suggested to his client that jumping out of the window and doing a runner was the best course of action in the circumstances .

He sounded to me like he was just another head-case lay legal adviser.
Why do you assume he made the suggestion? He suggested that ED make an appointment at the station.

How do you know he wasn't a barrister?

Last edited by sucheta19; 22-03-2015 at 05:44 PM.
sucheta19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-03-2015, 05:43 PM   #10710
baboshka1
Inactive
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 4,301
Likes: 2,962 (1,227 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nadams View Post
He wasn't a barrister. A barrister would not have suggested to his client that jumping out of the window and doing a runner was the best course of action in the circumstances .

He sounded to me like he was just another head-case lay legal adviser.
yeah
baboshka1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-03-2015, 05:44 PM   #10711
baboshka1
Inactive
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 4,301
Likes: 2,962 (1,227 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sucheta19 View Post
Why do you assume he make the suggestion? He suggested that ED make an appointment at the station.

How do you know he wasn't a barrister?
because they do not advise you to run as Nads said, running makes you look guilty in some peoples eyes.
but then just living in Hampstead makes you guilty

Last edited by baboshka1; 22-03-2015 at 05:46 PM.
baboshka1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-03-2015, 05:44 PM   #10712
silent revolution
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The vale of Tamesis. Love is life and life is love.
Posts: 5,440
Likes: 1,059 (499 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by frase View Post
Sure you'd have stayed wouldn't you.......probably have sectioned her by now or who knows what if she had stayed.....
Suggest you start playing the ball not the man or woman as its fucking tiresome q honestly...
Ella's last video was damning......assertive, with conviction. Eye contact. Not the behaviour of someone lying or coaching....
It's ludicrous to suggest all these names are part of a hoax....
It is akin to the bill hicks sketch about Judas Priest killing all their fans....and you and your mob are clinging to it.....the best you've got...!
Pitiful.
Now why Didnt the judge mention the marks on the privates on her very detailed conclusion....???
Oh yeah it's so hard to make eye contact with your own webcam in privacy without anyone at the other end watching because your just recording yourself. Oh yes so damning, so assertive, and with such conviction. Do you actually believe the bullshit you come out with? And if I got a fiver for every time you mentioned bill hicks/judas priest on this thread, I'd have at least £50 by now.

Quote:
Originally Posted by nadams View Post
He wasn't a barrister. A barrister would not have suggested to his client that jumping out of the window and doing a runner was the best course of action in the circumstances .

He sounded to me like he was just another head-case lay legal adviser.
I make you right. He certainly seemed by the tone of his voice to not be very confident and somewhat scared in that audio clip. I think 'another lay-legal advisor is about right.


Thanks susan for quoting the PACE. I couldn't be bothered to look for it myself, and there was another bit of legislation they mentioned as well (section 4? of something or other, I forget now).

Peace, love, harmony and wisdom friends
__________________
.................................-~*'.It's Only a Dream.'*.~-.

Last edited by silent revolution; 22-03-2015 at 05:48 PM.
silent revolution is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-03-2015, 05:45 PM   #10713
frase
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,069
Likes: 678 (309 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alf hearted View Post
What have these inconsiderate cunts been doing when they are accusing people of horrific crimes and naming them on the internet, thereby placing their children in danger of reprisal attacks on their homes?
No smoke without fire mate....now when are the libel cases starting if it isn't True? They even have a judge saying it's a hoax now......come on please I am all ears....when do libel cases start? When do Christ church sue for defamation?
frase is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-03-2015, 05:47 PM   #10714
sucheta19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 728
Likes: 10 (10 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by silent revolution View Post
Oh yeah it's so hard to make eye contact with your own webcam in privacy without anyone at the other end watching because your just recording yourself. Oh yes so damning, so assertive, and with such conviction. Do you actually believe the bullshit you come out with? And if I got a fiver for every time you mentioned bill hicks/judas priest on this thread, I'd have at least £50 by now.

I make you right. He certainly seemed by the tone of his voice to not be very confident and somewhat scared in that audio clip. I think 'another lay-legal advisor is about right.

Peace, love, harmony and wisdom friends
Evidence?
sucheta19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-03-2015, 05:48 PM   #10715
frase
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,069
Likes: 678 (309 Posts)
Default

[QUOTE=silent revolution;1062443512]Oh yeah it's so hard to make eye contact with your own webcam in privacy without anyone at the other end watching because your just recording yourself. Oh yes so damning, so assertive, and with such conviction. Do you actually believe the bullshit you come out with? And if I got a fiver for every time you mentioned bill hicks/judas priest on this thread, I'd have at least £50 by now.

Yes I mention it, as its pretty much akin to what you lot deem a rational explanation.....laughable....
Libel an entire community and get kids taken off you in process....all as a hoax to bamboozle truthers or some horse shit...
I am weak with laughter truly laughable.....keep clinging.
😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
frase is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-03-2015, 05:50 PM   #10716
alf hearted
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 13,152
Likes: 109 (86 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sucheta19 View Post
She did her best, in all the circumstances. What would you have done in her place, after her experience of police etc.
Her experience with the police began way before these events came about, via her disagreements with her ex-husband. Everytime they were called out and they didn't arrest RD on her say so, that would have lessened her trust in their ability to fight her corner. So why the police would have been the first people they went to, when one of them was actually friends with an ex-cop who could have given them advice about investigating these matters further, is anybody's guess.

With all that information supposedly provided just by listening to the children's accounts, they could have hid the children somewhere safe and did their own evidence gathering until they had more than just spurious allegations to go on. Just one day spent outside the school with that camcorder Spoonman had, and he could have had all these pedo's on film as they turned up for BSW. A copy of that sent to several news agencies and suitable MP's, with a little note saying "Check out what these kiddie fuckers are up to. If you don't you will be considered complicit" and we might have seen a different outcome. Had there been an ounce of truth to these claims.

But, there wasn't, and they didn't.
alf hearted is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-03-2015, 05:50 PM   #10717
silent revolution
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The vale of Tamesis. Love is life and life is love.
Posts: 5,440
Likes: 1,059 (499 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sucheta19 View Post
Evidence?
Yes, it is the audio video if you care to search back through the thread for it. There's only ten thousand odd posts to search through, it shouldn't take you too many days..

Quote:
Originally Posted by frase View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by silent revolution View Post
Oh yeah it's so hard to make eye contact with your own webcam in privacy without anyone at the other end watching because your just recording yourself. Oh yes so damning, so assertive, and with such conviction. Do you actually believe the bullshit you come out with? And if I got a fiver for every time you mentioned bill hicks/judas priest on this thread, I'd have at least £50 by now.
Yes I mention it, as its pretty much akin to what you lot deem a rational explanation.....laughable....
Libel an entire community and get kids taken off you in process....all as a hoax to bamboozle truthers or some horse shit...
I am weak with laughter truly laughable.....keep clinging.
��������������������
I'm not laughing. I take this whole case very seriously. I have no need to cling to anything. It may indeed be you who is clinging. It's funny how you talk about 'rational', as I have yet to see evidence of rational in your posts on this thread

Peace, love, harmony and wisdom friends
__________________
.................................-~*'.It's Only a Dream.'*.~-.

Last edited by silent revolution; 22-03-2015 at 06:05 PM.
silent revolution is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-03-2015, 05:51 PM   #10718
baboshka1
Inactive
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 4,301
Likes: 2,962 (1,227 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by frase View Post
No smoke without fire mate....now when are the libel cases starting if it isn't True? They even have a judge saying it's a hoax now......come on please I am all ears....when do libel cases start? When do Christ church sue for defamation?
only the people with money can take it to libel courts so if you are poor low wage, then you are guilty and you are fucked.
Is the justice system we want? its already fucked up as it is.
baboshka1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-03-2015, 05:53 PM   #10719
sucheta19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 728
Likes: 10 (10 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by silent revolution View Post
Yes, it is the audio video if you care to search back through the thread for it. There's only ten thousand odd posts to search through, it shouldn't take you too many days..

Peace, love, harmony and wisdom friend
The one with the grandparents? That doesn't say he's not a barrister. That's the one he challenges the police to produce their warrant.
sucheta19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-03-2015, 05:53 PM   #10720
susan0207
Inactive
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,386
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sucheta19 View Post
She issued a Legal Notice under UCC law.
oh you mean that law that neelu used to sue the police for 17 trillion? has she got the cash then? since it was not challenged.

Last edited by susan0207; 22-03-2015 at 05:54 PM.
susan0207 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
polygraph, ultrascribe

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:58 PM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.