View Single Post
Old 29-09-2016, 04:00 AM   #10
tommorgan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 229
Likes: 121 (79 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cosmic tramp View Post
I've actually raised this before that David needs a good editor. He's got a lot to say but I think with some discerning editorial he could get across the same information using about a third of the paper. His books are like phone directories. I don't mind , I can read and read and read all day and night before the sheeples come home, but I'm a bit weird like that. Bit more brevity may gain him a wider readership.
Agree the books need proof reading for example "entomology" and "etymology" unless it is a piss take but I have read that mistake in two different books and the errata in general is high not that that bothers most people. My understanding is his method of writing is inspired so it comes out like an avalanche. Difficult to write concisely in this way.
Likes: (1)
tommorgan is offline   Reply With Quote