View Single Post
Old 25-04-2018, 01:19 PM   #5
st jimmy
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 2,299
Likes: 1,499 (899 Posts)

I know Chris Spivey as one of the persons that investigates paedophilia and puts stories on the internet to expose what’s happening. In my opinion Spivey isn't capable of distinguishing between "real" and "fake" information.
I used some of Spivey's stories (it shows what information can be found, unlike Wikipedia...) as a starting point for my own investigation but don’t put links to it as there’s too much fiction between the facts...

Spivey has amongst others claimed that Lady Di was a Computer Generated Image…
Originally Posted by oz93666 View Post
Perhaps the worst ambassador for the truth movement there has ever been , he has appeared in a thread here before...
Here’s a link to his website; it includes the ridiculous story by Miles Mathis that Elvis Presley was a “Jew”, even though there’s absolutely no evidence to support that claim:

They once accused Spivey of possession of child pornography and bestiality...
I’m (almost) as smart as the police and when I saw the censored pictures on the site of Chris Spivey - I figured out that he had seen the uncensored versions. So they accused Chris Spivey with possessing child pornography and putting it on his website.
I’m not really sure about what the mentioned cause was for the (illegal) arrest of Chris Spivey (or if there were 2 separate cases). If I understand correctly he wasn’t arrested for child pornography (in his possession or on his site) but for “Suspicion of harassment”, because he (supposedly) posted offensive messages on Facebook.

These cops have such a wonderful sense of humour: they arrested him in a raid at 2 am on the 30th of July 2014 while his 18-year-old daughter and 1-year-old grandson were in the house. When Spivey refused to open the door they used force (this caused damage to his house…).
They also tried to take the custody for his grandson away from Spivey’s daughter.
The charges of possessing child pornography were dropped after it was found out that this collection had been on display at London’s Tate Modern as part of a set of iconic images from the 1920s and 1950s. That’s according to Spivey - but if he was charged with harassment this cannot be the reason.

Spivey claims that the British legal system has already spent millions of pounds harass him, which sounds a bit absurd to me.
Here you can read the story from Chris Spivey’s point of view:
Do NOT ever read my posts.
Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason:

Last edited by st jimmy; 25-04-2018 at 01:23 PM.
st jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote