View Single Post
Old 17-07-2012, 12:14 AM   #32
stupid
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,465
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

The "study/paper/whatever" was not a real study...it was a poll.
The voluntary poll asked regular unscientific people (on one website) who already believed that vaccines were harmful....asking these unscientific people to rate their opinions of vaccines and their harms. The results were compared to a scientific nation-wide survey (Germany).
Hmmmmm.... turns out when they compared the two, results were vastly different.
500% different.

See the problem here ?

One side was small, already biased, and unscientific......The other was large, controlled, and scientific.
Of course there was a difference......a difference that should not have been compared with each other in the first place.
It was an opinion poll vs. a scientific study.

Biased journalism at it's best example.
http://www.naturalnews.com/036220_va...allergies.html

see here...
http://metabunk.org/threads/618-Vacc...light=vaccines

Last edited by stupid; 17-07-2012 at 12:20 AM.
stupid is offline   Reply With Quote