View Single Post
Old 17-07-2017, 05:07 PM   #571
truegroup
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Conspiracy research is all about proof, not assumption!
Posts: 17,117
Likes: 1,316 (1,030 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by derekbuttery View Post
Once again no further forward that a rat's ass.
Sure we did, you got owned. You know nothing troll.

Quote:
so the link you provided wasn't cut n pasted? the "answers" you gave were not taken from elsewhere?
That is correct. I went to get a geologist to corroborate my points. He did so perfectly. Only a complete moron would dismiss that and claim they know better....oh wait

Quote:
you have failed.
No you truly, truly sad person.

Quote:
you your failure to even answer the question WHY CAN WE NOT MANUFACTURE MOON ROCKS ON EARTH? yourself shows that your whole viewpoint on anything suggested by anyone other than NASA / mainstream science is completely retarded by the worship of such entities.
Sad person, answered dozens of times, understood by Delbut zero.

Quote:
ok. I'll rephrase it to make it a little easier, more palatable for you :

IN YOUR OPINION WHY DO YOU THINK WE CANNOT MANUFACTURE EXTRA TERRESTRIAL ROCKS?
Troll. Repeats his question for god knows how many times.

Quote:
I have shown we have the materials, the technology and the know how. You just insult and try to reprimand those that do not suckle at the teat of everything mainstream.
You have shown you are the most ignorant troll in this thread. You know less than nothing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by truegroup View Post
Every time the troll asks the same ignorant question I shall provide the same informed response. As though this clueless blunderer thinks he's found a problem.

http://meteorites.wustl.edu/lunar/howdoweknow.htm
They Were Faked


READ IT!!

Any geoscientist (and there have been thousands from all over the world) who has studied lunar samples knows that anyone who thinks the Apollo lunar samples were created on Earth as part of government conspiracy doesn't know much about rocks. The Apollo samples are just too good. They tell a self-consistent story with a complexly interwoven plot that's better than any story any conspirator could have conceived. I've studied lunar rocks and soils for 45+ years and I couldn't make even a poor imitation of a lunar breccia, lunar soil, or a mare basalt in the lab. And with all due respect to my clever colleagues in government labs, no one in "the Government" could do it either, even now that we know what lunar rocks are like. Lunar samples show evidence of formation in an extremely dry environment with essentially no free oxygen and little gravity. Some have impact craters on the surface and many display evidence for a suite of unanticipated and complicated effects associated with large and small meteorite impacts. Lunar rocks and soil contain gases (hydrogen, helium, nitrogen, neon, argon, krypton, and xenon) derived from the solar wind with isotope ratios different than Earth forms of the same gases. They contain crystal damage from cosmic rays. Lunar igneous rocks have crystallization ages, determined by techniques involving radioisotopes, that are older than any known Earth rocks. (Anyone who figures out how to fake that is worthy of a Nobel Prize.) It was easier and cheaper to go to the Moon and bring back some rocks than it would have been to create all these fascinating features on Earth. [After writing these words I learned that virtually the same sentiments had already been expressed by some of my lunar sample colleagues.]


1. The rocks contain volcanic beads formed in low gravity.

2. Many contain zap pits from micro-meteorites impacts.

3. They all contain solar isotopes showing exposure to solar winds and solar events.

4. Their exterior helium 3 is stronger due to shallow penetrating solar wind.

5. Water found within the beads is of very rare isotopes and ratios.

6. These samples were being analysed 50 years ago.

7. Even a single element compressed carbon is detectable as fake in 2017.

8. It is impossible to remove all traces of water/oxygen/nitrogen interaction from terrestrial weathering.

THAT's why it is impossible. Those reasons given many times. Read the page from the world renowned geologist.

Last edited by truegroup; 17-07-2017 at 05:08 PM.
truegroup is offline   Reply With Quote