View Single Post
 12-04-2009, 01:06 PM #14 barbitone Senior Member   Join Date: May 2007 Location: KURANDA,QLD, AUSTRALIA Posts: 1,272 Likes: 3 (2 Posts) So if 2 and 5 are paired then so must these; 4-7, 1-1 and 8-8. The 4 and 7 do the same thing only in movements of x2 instead of x1. 2&5 went; 1,2,4,8,7,5 whereas 4&7 go; “1” skip 2, “4” skip 8, “7” skip 5 back to “1”. Multiples of 4 move clockwise and multiples of 7 move anti-clockwise. Division by 4 moves anti-clockwise as you would expect but something interesting happens when you divide by 7. You get this repeating decimal, when dividing by 7, of the same 2 FNG’s (1,4,7s and 2,5,8s.) When you get to 7 it is back to 1. This sequence draws this pattern which is well known as the “Enneagram”; But if you add these decimal numbers together you get all nines? So what’s going on? If 7÷7 = 1, then the next would be to divide 8 by 7, but the same pattern continues from the beginning again. So in this instance 8=1. (8+1=9) 8 and 1 are mirrors. So what is the mirror of the number we are dividing by? “2”. So look at division by 2 table and the decimal parity number for 8, it is “4” Why did I choose 8? Because it is the mirror of 1, the number am trying to find for 1÷7. So now I know 1÷7 = 0.142857 but those numbers all add up to 9? So I referred to the mirror table of 7s and looked at 8 because I am trying to find 1 which is its mirror. It was 4 so now I know that 0.142857 = 4 And so on... You end up with; 4, 8, 3, 7, 2, 6 Which is moving by 4’s, o we’re back on track in terms of symmetry. 1&1 2&5 4&7 8&8 (But there is something different about sevens. They seem to act like a secondary 9!) __________________ Squeegee your third-fucking-eye-(Bill Hicks) THE NASSIM HARAMEIN THREAD http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=32453 THE MARKO RODIN THREAD http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=61370 http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=61612