View Single Post
Old 21-07-2017, 08:51 PM   #591
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Conspiracy research is all about proof, not assumption!
Posts: 17,117
Likes: 1,316 (1,030 Posts)

Originally Posted by derekbuttery View Post
no. you. didn't.
Yes I did. Loser....there it is again just below.

you're just a cut n paste cowboy that cannot explain jack shit in it's most common denominator.
Correction, you are too dense to understand therefore you assume everyone is. I reference and back up my claims. People like you can't even make claims properly

no imagination, nothing to say for yourself, no self thought, no critical thinking... completely in the pocket of TPTB. never siding with icke yet never saying he's wrong, always quoting mainstream science, media, NASA and the world govt.... you're a nothing.
And here goes the troll, with his ad-hom attacks yet again. One of us provides substantive well thought out posts, the other is a useless ex football hooligan who wouldn't recognise a rock if it flew over the Holt End with a big label saying ROCK.

better to be an also ran than a never has been, never will be, and considered totally irrelevant by a lot of have trouble with people on this site (according to my inbox). I called you out before regarding your shilling membership on this site and probing threads. now fuck off
Fuck off? With people like you infesting this forum with your ignorance, I'll stick around

"owned" how old are you.... go and join your fanclub under whichever 'moon' rock you want and play with each other's...
Yep. Owned, dozens of times.

was I talking to you cod-piss face?

now who's trolling?
You are.

fucking retard that you are (yeah I know 3/5 points!!)

Urgh, what a truly ghastly repertoire of filth you spew out.

Here, once again for the reading challenged....
They Were Faked

Any geoscientist (and there have been thousands from all over the world) who has studied lunar samples knows that anyone who thinks the Apollo lunar samples were created on Earth as part of government conspiracy doesn't know much about rocks. The Apollo samples are just too good. They tell a self-consistent story with a complexly interwoven plot that's better than any story any conspirator could have conceived. I've studied lunar rocks and soils for 45+ years and I couldn't make even a poor imitation of a lunar breccia, lunar soil, or a mare basalt in the lab. And with all due respect to my clever colleagues in government labs, no one in "the Government" could do it either, even now that we know what lunar rocks are like.

-------->Lunar samples show evidence of formation in an extremely dry environment with essentially no free oxygen and little gravity.

-------->Some have impact craters on the surface and many display evidence for a suite of unanticipated and complicated effects associated with large and small meteorite impacts.

-------->Lunar rocks and soil contain gases (hydrogen, helium, nitrogen, neon, argon, krypton, and xenon) derived from the solar wind with isotope ratios different than Earth forms of the same gases. T

-------->They contain crystal damage from cosmic rays.

-------->Lunar igneous rocks have crystallization ages, determined by techniques involving radioisotopes, that are older than any known Earth rocks.

(Anyone who figures out how to fake that is worthy of a Nobel Prize.) It was easier and cheaper to go to the Moon and bring back some rocks than it would have been to create all these fascinating features on Earth. [After writing these words I learned that virtually the same sentiments had already been expressed by some of my lunar sample colleagues.]

My simplified list:

1. The rocks contain volcanic beads formed in low gravity.

2. Many contain zap pits from micro-meteorites impacts.

3. They all contain solar isotopes showing exposure to solar winds and solar events.

4. Their exterior helium 3 is stronger due to shallow penetrating solar wind.

5. Water found within the beads is of very rare isotopes and ratios.

6. These samples were being analysed 50 years ago.

7. Even a single element compressed carbon is detectable as fake in 2017.

8. It is impossible to remove all traces of water/oxygen/nitrogen interaction from terrestrial weathering.

9. There are 842lbs of the buggers! These include 3m core samples.

Last edited by truegroup; 21-07-2017 at 08:58 PM.
truegroup is offline   Reply With Quote