View Single Post
Old 10-07-2018, 08:51 AM   #5
ianw
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,032
Likes: 144 (107 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by truegroup View Post
Totally made up shit. Yet again you pour out your moronic Kubrick dunnit claim without a single iota of proof.

What the fuck do you mean by "moon set"? They had 50 hours of surface footage with areas many acres wide. We have visibly astronauts wandering hundreds of metres back and forth, left and right, up hills, down them, crossing over. The "set" is perfectly lit for the entire area we see, with one single light source and always one shadow. The sky is jet black!
The sky may appear black, so what the sky is a natural blue screen. With one light source.
Only an apolo fanatic would think movies are filmed entirely in one location eg studio.
Why dont you use some trigonometry to show how far the horizons should be in various moon scenes. I have read on your posts in the distant past that the mountains are 300 miles away but appear a lot closer because of the vacuum. You have already demonstrated such vigor on flat earth threads so you have no excuse not to do the same for the sake of apolo




.
__________________
My definition of being a flatmooner is the apolow footage was filmed in a studio
https://forum.davidicke.com/showpost...2&postcount=55

Last edited by ianw; 10-07-2018 at 09:18 AM.
ianw is offline   Reply With Quote