View Single Post
Old 01-11-2016, 01:01 AM   #16
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 37 (19 Posts)

Since the masonic liberal vatican 2 council the popes have done a decent job of holding back the tide. Pope benedict was the good guy... and he was ANTI new world order... unfortunatly he was forced to step down

"On the one hand, there have been systems of Marxist orientation that promised the attainment of the desired reign of man by way of their ideologically-driven politics; an attempt that obviously failed. On the other hand, efforts to build the future have been made by attempts that draw more or less profoundly from the source of liberal traditions. Under the title New World Order, these efforts take on a configuration; they increasingly relate to the UN"

"Such a philosophy is no longer utopian, in the sense of a Marxist dream. On the contrary, it is very realistic: it determines the limits of the well-being sought from limited means for attaining it. This philosophy recommends, for example, without seeking to justify itself, not worrying about taking care of those who are no longer productive nor have any hope of a quality life. Furthermore, it no longer expects that people, used to riches and well being, be ready to make requisite sacrifices, on the contrary, it recommends ways of reducing the number of participants at humanity’s table, so that at least the so called happiness, already acquired by some, will not be touched"

"And so, at the stage of the present development of a new image of a new world, we reach the point where the Christian ---not only him but especially him---is obliged to protest."

- Joseph Ratziger (Pope Benedict XVI)
Preface to the book "The Gospel: Confronting World Disorder"

Pope benedict xvi did more than you realise to oppose the new world order but he didnt get the backing he should have by catholics when he needed us most... in the end the wolves in the vatican forced him out

Pope jp ii was more diplomatic than ratziger but he refused to endorse the sustainable development goals he opposed them on abortion etc chastised them for creating a "culture of death" ratziger was more aggressive he wanted to defeat them he really attacked them... i have seen so many people quote newspapers who mis quote his encyclical "CARITAS IN VERITATE" but if one were to read it it become apparent he is opposing the new world order not promoting it.

Francis on the other hand he endorsed the milenium development goals has backed the united nations refused to denounce the un eugenics programes that jpii and ratziger opposed he is working for the enemy... its so sad

Last edited by dlb2007; 01-11-2016 at 01:25 AM.
dlb2007 is offline   Reply With Quote