Thread: The race war
View Single Post
Old 19-01-2019, 02:43 PM   #806
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

'Social Justice': what it really means

Georgia TA: 'Some White People May Have To Die..."
by Tyler Durden
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 20:05

Authored by Eduardo Neret via Campus Reform,

University of Georgia (UGA) teaching assistant wrote Wednesday on Facebook that “some white people may have to die for black communities to be made whole in this struggle to advance to freedom."

UGA philosophy TA Irami Osei-Frimpong made the comment during a conversation on the Overheard at UGA Facebook page. The comment has since been deleted. Osei-Frimpong claimed in May 2017 that Facebook suspended him for quoting from an article which detailed how Texas A&M professor Tommy Curry had said “in order to be equal, in order to be liberated, some white people may have to die.”

“Killing some white people isn’t genocide; it’s killing some white people,” the UGA TA explained in a Medium post.

“We had to kill some white people to get out of slavery. Maybe if we’d killed more during the 20th century we still wouldn’t talk about racialized voter disenfranchisement and housing, education, and employment discrimination. This should not be controversial.”



Osei-Frimpong’s Wednesday comment, seemingly inspired by Curry, is far from the first racially-charged remark made by the scholar.

“Fighting white people is a skill,” the UGA TA tweeted on Jan. 12, adding that it is why he supports integrated schools.

“You have to get used to fighting White people. It takes practice.”

He then quoted American clinical psychologist Bobby Wright, saying, “Blacks kill Blacks because they have never been trained to kill Whites.”



Last semester, at a Young Democrats meeting, Frimpong compared Southern whites in America to “sociopaths” and “autistic kids.” Later on, in November, he called for Democrats to “wage war on the white electorate” and wrote that white “institutions” that “make crappy white people” such as churches, schools, and families must be “dismantled.” Facebook subsequently gave Osei-Frimpong a temporary suspension.

Despite the TA’s history with controversial racial rhetoric, UGA has chosen not to take any action.

Regarding his latest comments, a spokesperson at UGA’s Equal Opportunities Office said in an email obtained by Campus Reform that Osei-Frimpong’s views expressed his “personal opinion,” in his “personal capacity,” on a private platform.

The spokesperson also asked the recipient of the email to contact their office if any information was discovered that showed Osei-Frimpong made “discriminatory or harassing comments” in his capacity as a member of the UGA community.

Some of Osei-Frimpong’s UGA colleagues have gone as far to defend his previous comments about white Americans. UGA Associate Professor of Brain and Behavioral Science Dr. Janet Frick once tweeted that the TA’s comments were not hate speech, but rather “hurt your feelings speech.”

Campus Reform reached out to Osei-Frimpong for further comment but did not receive a response in time for publication.

Editor's note: Campus Reform encourages civil discourse and acknowledges professors' First Amendment right to free speech. The purpose of this article, like any other, is to present the facts and allow our readers to form their own opinions
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-...e-may-have-die

Quote:
Originally Posted by iamawaveofthesea View Post
The concept of 'social justice' is predicated on the belief that white people are inherently racist and are responsible for all the problems in the world. For adherents to this belief system the pursuit of 'social justice' then hinges around removing white people from existence as some sort of moral imperitive

But the deeper i explore into history the more this idea falls apart. One thing I've found is that non white people were perfectly capable of misbehaving before they had contact with white people for example slavery was common in africa and people were sacrificing each other in the americas and head hunting each other in the jungles of borneo etc etc

Another thing i've found is that much of what is being blamed on white people was actually being carried out by jewish people and freemasons (who are themselves descended from jewish knights templar bloodlines)

For example the trans-atlantic slave trade was largely run by jewish people and was largely financed by them. They owned slave ships, they ran slave markets, they owned proportionately more slaves in the americas than white people did. They also financed the sugar trade which was part of that triangular trade and they ran the sugar processing plants. Why do we not hear about that?

White people are being scapegoated unfairly for all the crimes of history in this post truth world. This idea of painting a target on the backs of white people while injecting millions of non-white people into their geographic locale does not strike me as a formula for societal harmony

I think this debate needs some perspective to restore some sanity; its time to hold up a mirror to the actions of others
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote