View Single Post
Old 01-07-2018, 07:17 PM   #29
truegroup
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Conspiracy research is all about proof, not assumption!
Posts: 17,117
Likes: 1,316 (1,030 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by st jimmy View Post
No of course not - LOW BANDWITH!!!
YES!!!!

http://www.clavius.org/tvqual.html

Quote:
Is that the best theory that NASA could muster in almost 50 years?!?
No, this is the best bullshit HBs can muster. It isn't a "theory" it is a fact. The TV signal was transmitted on a low bandwidth.

Quote:
Unless of course you mean that it's a "scientific" explanation that see-through people are a sign of failed special effects!
That's what happens with ghosting duhhhh.

Let's put this in context. The complaint from the noisy HBs is that the Apollo 11 TV transmissions are signs of something nefarious because they haven't a clue about how it was done, why or the consequences for that transmission type. However, on Apollo 15/16/17 the camera is massively upgraded, colour, higher bandwidth and none of the problems from Apollo 11.

Perhaps one of the HBs can explain how the crap this was filmed.....as if!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3OVh0gm5vtc



Not a peep from any of you!


By peep, I mean a coherent honest response
truegroup is offline   Reply With Quote