View Single Post
Old 14-11-2016, 04:02 PM   #23
the apprentice
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,637
Likes: 2,987 (2,092 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iamawaveofthesea View Post
The disclosure of spraying begins! they will admit that they are spraying us but will claim that they are doing it for our good becasue of 'climate change'

United Nations Recognizes The Dangers Of Geoengineering
November 9, 2016
By Derrick Broze

The United Nations has released a new report stating that the practice of geoengineering the weather presents dangers to the environment, but may be necessary to fight climate change.

In late October the United Nations’ Convention on Biological Diversity released a new report examining the problems of geoengineering and whether or not humanity will be forced to employ the practice in an attempt to halt climate change. The report, Update On Climate Geoengineering In relation to the Convention on Biologicial Diversity: Potential Impacts and Regulatory Framework, found that geoengineering “would reduce the impacts of climate change on biodiversity at the global level”, but also cause unpredictable rain and temperature distribution on the local level.

The report defines geoengineering as “a deliberate intervention in the planetary environment of a nature and scale intended to counteract anthropogenic climate change and its impacts.”
http://www.activistpost.com/2016/11/...g-dangers.html
The report says

In general, geoengineering technologies are categorized as either a carbon dioxide removal (CDR) method or a solar radiation management (SRM) (or albedo-modification)method. CDR methods address the warming effects of greenhouse gases by removing carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere. CDR methods include ocean fertilization, and carbon capture and sequestration. SRM methods address climate change by increasing the reflectivity of the Earth’s atmosphere or surface.Aerosol injection and space-based reflectors are examples of SRM methods. SRM methods do not remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere, but can be deployed faster with relatively immediate global cooling results compared to CDR methods.

BUT

What it does not mention is to achieve the blocking requires extra pollution in order to generate any noticeable effects, in effectively cancelling out any actions and reactions.

This will suit TPTB down to the ground level and raise further taxes against those they are spposedly spraying for, we will foot both bills entirely, here is the triple humped camel through the eye of a needle.

If they did manage to create such solar eclipses can you imagine the power over photosynthesis they will command by geo stationary mirrors.

This is where science becomes man's worst enemy.

And this is what they are currently doing in my humble opinion, they are blocking the sunlight to control crop yields, then the speculators jump in on the commodity bandwagon and people then starve on a global scale because they cannot afford the staples due to corporate hoarding.

They are in effect rationing sunlight as we speak.

Last edited by the apprentice; 14-11-2016 at 04:05 PM.
the apprentice is offline   Reply With Quote