View Single Post
Old 18-05-2018, 08:30 PM   #30
breaker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: limbo
Posts: 822
Likes: 440 (242 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by truegroup View Post
Me: Do you understand what the burden of proof is? I don't NEED to disprove a negative.

You: So back up your understanding with facts not opinion.

Conclusion: No you do not understand the burden of proof.

HE WHO ASSERTS ----- YOU ----- MUST PROVE THEIR CASE.

NOT ME. YOU

Me: YOU seem to think evil chemtrails happen, you have the obligation to prove it. I am not obligated to disprove this stupid claim. Extreme claims require extreme proof.

You: I have no obligation to provide a reason for my own opinion.

Conclusion: I agree. Your opinion is just that. And you admit you have no proof for this wild opinion, yet still have it

Me: But that's ok...you admit you can't prove they are real....so...

You: And you can not admit that you also have no 100% evidence.

You really are being frightfully dim. I don't have to DISPROVE your shit. YOU have to PROVE it.

Example, chemtrails is real, look at those white bits in the sky. Those white bits are water droplets from the plane exhaust. Now what?
This isn’t a courtroom sir.

Have chemtrails been a normal occurrence since the invention of the jet engine ?

Please don’t be frightfully dim by avoiding the question yet again sir.

__________________
DISCLAIMER: Reader discretion advised. The above post is entirely fictional, for entertainment purposes only Any similarities to real life events, animals, humans, persons, politicians or any other form of organisation entity living, dead or in any other state of existence are coincidental Any opinion, comment or statements related or attributed to this username are not necessarily nor implied to be those held by the ip/computer/username or other electronic media device or service owner/user.
breaker is offline   Reply With Quote