View Single Post
Old 11-02-2019, 09:52 AM   #9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)

Originally Posted by white light View Post
If there is no-one in the world that can experience that objective frequency in any way other than subjectively, then how objective is it?

You may have a different subjective perception to other people of what the words frequency and colour mean. So, how objective is your definition of what is objective? How would you know?

Frequency is a measure of time. Is time coloured?

You give no explanation of how frequency is related to colour. As such, your usage of it is just meaningless words on a page, or at the very least - highly subjective. Even if there were consensus opinion as to how frequency relates to colour derived from scientific principles, it remains a subjective view until such time as you have a complete understanding of how that works and could prove it.

How do you know that people pick up the same frequencies? Is every radio playing the same radio station? Seems like an assumption. Assumptions are subjective. That's my subjective assumption anyway.

The only objective reality that I see is that I can observe that in this universe 1 + 1 = 2 and I can derive a mathematical system from that. But as others have pointed out, when it comes to sexual relationships 1 + 1 can equal 3 or more.

what you rothschild commies want to do is argue that morality is subjective and that actually it is just your subjective opinion that it is ok to fuck kids and that because opinion is subjective your view is just as valid as everyone elses

well some may have an opinion that it is ok to use extreme force to prevent you from doing that
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote