View Single Post
Old 29-09-2017, 06:10 AM   #231
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,118
Likes: 345 (266 Posts)

Originally Posted by synergetic67 View Post
To make a long story short, it's a "documentary style" "reality" movie. What you saw was a pre-manufactured Hollywood production, long in the planning (probably from even before the very building of the towers themselves, in somewhat mysterious and "hollow" fashion I might add, complete with ghost companies as well as some real tenants, as symbols of America's virility to be castrated in front of the world), complete with all the resources of a Hollywood studio, any-and-all techniques of Media Fakery, plus the resources of the Mossad and CIA: CGI, actors, green-screens, newscasters like Matt Lauer, Katie Couric, Diane Sawyer, Peter Jennings, Rick Leventhal and others acting in the film, etc. Everything they use in a movie to make you believe in a movie. Did they combine some real "live" newscasting with stuff that was faked before? Of course! But not all that much, because IT'S MUCH EASIER AND LESS LIKELY TO PRODUCE MISTAKES if they just shoot it in as many takes as necessary to get it right and then air it as "live," whenever and wherever they should need it. Who's going to check to make sure it's all "live"? NOBODY, that's who. That's the BIG MISTAKE that people make thinking there are all kinds of "guardians of honesty in the media" looking out for them. What a laugh! After a pile of bullshit as gigantic and as obvious as the Moon Hoax believed by BILLIONS? After the pile of Everest-high horse-shit that was 9-11? LOL All the techniques of faking an event can be and ARE used because a Media Fakery modus operandi LEAVES ALL OPTIONS OPEN. They can make ANYONE they want a "victim" and anyone they want a "terrorist," etc. Vic-SIMS from scratch on a computer or Vic-Sim actors who have little family connections, take a big-pay-off and receive a new identity or simply act the film under an assumed identity and go back to their original one. Creating the victims form scratch is the easiest and has the least hassle. JUST LOOK AT THE PICTURES OF BOB MCILVAINES "SON" below! Does that look like a "real person" to you? LOL

Could they use REAL LIFE people as actors in the film? YES. But if they do, they always give them fake identities. Then they just simply go back to their regular lives under their original names after they get their payoff and deny being the person in the 9-11 "movie," only a lookalike. Since no-one dies, only "weight on their conscience," (should they even have a "conscience") would be LYING to their countrymen for the benefit of hegemony and massacres of faceless people overseas. But as you'll see, if you read this thread and the September Clues VICSIM report, it's much easier just to create the identity from scratch, since nobody but a handful of people in the entire world bother to check these things at all. For example here are the ONLY PHOTOS of boo-hoo-hoo-on-cue actor Bob McIlvaine's "son" ever seen:


It's obviously the same idiotic and ridiculous frozen-face image photo-shopped in each picture, including the one with his supposed "fiance." Who the fuck is the fiance? Either a douche actor like the elder McIlvaine or a faked and shopped (and maybe even morphed from a template) image like the supposed "son." Does the son's name appear in the SSDI or have a death certificate? Of course not! And just recently I heard they changed the rules so that we can't even check the SSDI to verify "victims" except THREE YEARS AFTER EACH "terrorist" EVENT! I'm anything but a fear-monger and I hate Alex Jones, but can you say Orwellian tyranny?

Here's McIlvaine going about his disgusting and traitorous business like that other asshole actor and traitorous scumbag, controlled-opposition asset Willie Rodriguez:

The unOfficial William Rodriguez unFan Club - "Free Willy Forum"

Note: the above link to Let's Roll Forum's complete exposure of the scumbag liar traitor William Rodriguez IS NOT an endorsement of LRF as a whole or even the 9-11 part of their theories as a whole, ONLY their research on Willie Rodriguez's bullshit which is the most extensive anywhere on the net, so much so that it seems to have sent Willie's shillery operation into permanent hibernation.

Notice that McIlvaine sometimes even "blames Bush" and hints that it might all be an "inside job" to give his sorry-ass acting some "street-cred" and credibility in the eyes of the gullible-as-fuck alternative media. How gullible they all are! How gullible I was, until I started reading Shack's brilliant work. The most banned theory in all of the alt media.

Now remember, here is McIlvaine going on 9-11 "victims' families" tours with a few other clowns CRYING ON CUE every time he talks about his supposed "son" that died on 9-11 AND THOSE ABOVE IMAGES are the ONLY ONES available! How can anyone believe this shit? And yet, BILLIONS have, for 14 years, and MILLIONS have as well in the alternative gatekept media, for 14 years, including that gatekeeper you've been getting led around by the nose by "Doctor" Judy Wood. lol

That's right, Judy friggin Wood still thinks that 3000 people were whacked, still thinks that the KING-KONG-sized "jumpers" were real, still thinks Bob McIlvaine's "son" is real, etc., and did not bother to do ANY image verification before she put up her pompous-assed theories and sold me and many suckers like myself a 40 dollar book! I wipe my ass with her worthless shill book now. It's absolutely worthless to me know.

And here's the disgusting shill Kevin Barrett having this obvious actor McIlvaine on his laughable "truth jihad" show, while agreeing with him 100% and not even asking him: "Hey asshole, how come there are only 4 shopped photos of your 'son' on the net and how come you're going around saying he 'died on 9-11' and he's not in the Social Security Death Index?"

Then they simply aired this entire fully controlled movie and its photographic image-pool as "live" in many pieces, as needed, including stuff released later as "amateur" captures THROUGH ONE COMPANY called "Camera Planet" owned by a guy named Stephen Rosenbaum who claimed to have received 500-plus hours of "amatuer" film in response to a simple ad placed in a paper. lol

You obviously have not taken even 5 minutes to read anything on this thread and want me to babysit you through it, instead of making the effort yourself.

That's not going to happen. Not in a million years. I don't babysit anyone. I answer questions by people who DO THEIR OWN WORK FIRST.

Go back and read this ENTIRE thread first and take as long as you have to in order to do it (shouldn't take more than a few days), second, go to the links at Clues Forum and investigate a bit further (a few more days), third, listen to the many audios done from a media-fakery angle posted here (a few more days), and IF YOU STILL HAVE QUESTIONS LEFT about problems with Shack's theory after that, I'll try to answer them then if I can. Fair?

Meanwhile, to give you a little motivation to get off your ass and start the reading, check this out:

WTC 7, the so-called "smoking gun" of the alt media gatekeepers, completely disappearing on FOX News at the 31 second mark:

This short 3 minute video alone is conclusive proof that the "smoking gun" of 9-11 is media-fakery. Everything else given to people on a Silverstein platter or the Loose Change/Alex-Jones bait-with-the-government-did-it-&-hook platter or the Chistopher Bollyn / Alan Sabrosky / Prostink bait-with-Israel-did-it-&-hook platter is different variations of the same rabbit trail leading the fully anticipated dissenters and internet researchers away from the MANY conclusive proofs of media fakery such as this and the media's full complicity in the 9-11 PsyOp.

Two gifs of the 31 second mark in the above posted Fox airing (notice also that the front "buildings" shift, totally damning evidence of layering):

Every other PsyOp we've seen since the Moon Hoax follows more-or-less the same template and could not have even been accomplished had it not been for full media control and complicity. It is certainly not a "moral" decision not to whack people in these PsyOps and just make people believe they were whacked but a PRAGMATIC ONE. It works better. Just look at how well it's worked over-&-over again since 9-11 and since before that, the Moon Landing Hoax! Since the media's full complicity is established, then all that needs to be answered is the already answered question of "Who Owns and Runs 90-plus percent of the World's Media?"

The answer is: Elite Jews and their collaborators

How did they acquire this ownership?

The answer is: through the practice of legalized usury (lending the entire money supplies of countries at compound interest, money which they print out of thin air or enter into a computer screen) and legalized fractional reserve counterfeiting

That's who did 9-11 and every other PsyOp using the same template requiring FULL media complicity, period.

Who Controls Television ?

Who Controls Big Media ?

Who Controls the News ?

Not very complicated now, is it boys and girls?

Not at all, once we have the proper info. Problem is, it is the really damaging info such as this that the entire post-PsyOp controlled-opposition gatekeeping groups are seeded to bury under mountains of dis-information. We've been bashing our heads against walls for years because so many people continue to get suckered in by these obvious false trails and red herrings, these baits and hooks. And then to see the absurdity of people continuing the nauseating charade with the most obvious media-faked PsyOp of all -- Sandy Hook -- is enough to give even the most persistent researchers a case of burn-out.

September Clues Addendum - Simon Shack

"The world is full of magical things patiently waiting for our wits to grow sharper." -- Bertrand Russell

"Fear is the main source of superstition, and one of the main sources of cruelty. To conquer fear is the beginning of wisdom." -- Bertrand Russell

"I have listened with great interest to discussions regarding decentralization and centralization and I have thought that the question of whether it is valid to decentralize or centralize is unanswerable because it deals with one one-way sign in two-way traffic. It is a static question in a dynamic universe.

Man was invented a mobile device and process. He has survived through his ability to advance or retreat as his mortal requirements have dictated. Of his two primary faculties, quickness is of great importance but intellect is first.

He recognizes that vital quickness may be momentary reflex but that satisfactory continuities are proportional to his degree of comprehension of the consequence of his initiative. Degree of comprehension he measures in the terms of the complex integration of all individuals' all-time experience, as processed by intellectual integrity. His quickness would be a spontaneous servant to that integrity.

Despite intermittent submissiveness to runaway momentums of residual ignorance, man guards most dearly and secretly his freedom of thought and initiative. Therefrom emanates the social-industrial relay, from self starter to group starters.

Out of this freedom alone understanding may be generated. Man recognizes understanding as an activated circuit of mutual comprehension by individual minds. Understanding must be plural. However, because individual experience is unique, understanding can be developed only in principle out of the compounding significance of plurality of experience. Thus, man knows that the voluntary interactions of understanding dealing in fundamental principles will always master involuntary mass actions, and that individual freedom ever anticipates and ultimately masters mutual emergency."

~ from "Ideas and Integrities" by Buckminster Fuller (1963)

Negentropic Chronicles - Episode 1 -
Repost with missing photos of Bob McIlvaine's fake, vic-sim son re-inserted back into my former post above where it was deleted after I stopped using that disgusting extortion racket of pure gutter-scum thieves which is "photobucket."

I also included a composite "memorial" page I found with some ridiculous "sports star athlete" photos intended to make the faked "loss of life" that much more "tragic" and "unfortunate," which prove nothing except even more dramatic intervention in his ridiculous VICSIM narrative.
synergetic67 is offline   Reply With Quote