[totalrecall]

IMO, the moon is a concave projection, like a bowl (the bowl theory is thanks to another member of the forum, whose name I forget). According to Cyrus Tweed, this is because the moon is a projection of the crust of the earth. I don't know about the latter being true, but the first two conjectures have evidence to support them.

IMO, the sun is a machine, an artificial "man-made" machine 4000 miles up. The luminous part is calculated at being 20 miles in diameter. The shape of the machine has been theorized to be an octagonal double pyramid by one member of this forum. There is no evidence for this except that pyramids create circular fields around them and that these fields are supposed to be the earth's crusts etc. I actually quite like the theory, but that is all that it is. I like to think of the sun as being a kind of lighthouse. It would certainly shine new light on the way the masons and ancients worshipped the Sun and the pyramid.

We of course live on the inside of the earth which is shaped like an egg and is just a giant computer or machine in effect. The physical laws of nature only really apply to the crust which we live on. Everything else too far below and too far above the crust have different physical realities. The latter is supported by a little bit of evidence.

The earth does NOT rotate. The notion that it rotates is ludicrous when one actually takes a minute to think about it. One year ago I would have laughed at the concept that the earth machine does NOT rotate. Now it is so self evident, that I am pleased with my "beyond the indoctrination" process. I am making great strides in understanding my world all the time. The Internet is "God's" tool, although I don't like the term "god" for obvious reasons that it is an entirely vague label with no real meaning.

With the rotation theory, the air and water is supposed to rotate at the same speed as the solid crust which is of course impossible as the three areas above have completely different densities.