David Icke's Official Forums (https://forum.davidicke.com/index.php)
-   Today's News (https://forum.davidicke.com/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   Naming of potential paedophiles. (https://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=277758)

garethicke 14-07-2014 02:08 PM

Naming of potential paedophiles.
 
Hi,
I have seen a fair few posts over the last day or two, flippantly throwing out names of potential paedophiles in the public eye.
Can we please not do that. If you have evidence that someone is guilty, present the evidence. But randomly throwing out names, with no evidence, can't be tolerated on this forum.

It is morally wrong, and potentially very harmful for all of us that use the forum.

Thanks folks.
Gareth

borsabil 16-07-2014 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by garethicke (Post 1062160739)
Hi,
I have seen a fair few posts over the last day or two, flippantly throwing out names of potential paedophiles in the public eye.
Can we please not do that. If you have evidence that someone is guilty, present the evidence. But randomly throwing out names, with no evidence, can't be tolerated on this forum.

It is morally wrong, and potentially very harmful for all of us that use the forum.

Thanks folks.
Gareth

It's a fair request and I'm as guilty as anyone. I'll confine myself to pointing out that certain individuals are happy to associate with other individuals who are known, or have been accused, of paedohilia. People can make their own minds up.

bikerdruid 16-07-2014 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by borsabil (Post 1062163001)
It's a fair request and I'm as guilty as anyone. I'll confine myself to pointing out that certain individuals are happy to associate with other individuals who are known, or have been accused, of paedohilia. People can make their own minds up.

yup .. 'guilt by association' ... "if the green grocer spoke kindly to jimmy saville, he must have been part of the clique."
that always works ... :rolleyes:

swamideva 16-07-2014 03:03 PM

If its guilt by association. Then what about the spouse, family, siblings, relatives, friends and co-workers of the paedophile who had no idea of what they were up to or downloading in secret?

lobuk 16-07-2014 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by borsabil (Post 1062163001)
It's a fair request and I'm as guilty as anyone. I'll confine myself to pointing out that certain individuals are happy to associate with other individuals who are known, or have been accused, of paedohilia. People can make their own minds up.

Association is complete speculation and is randomly throwing out names, with no evidence.

Lets stick to facts backed by evidence as it says in the OP please.

Thanks

the worm that returned 17-07-2014 08:27 PM

I have always been intrigued as to how David Icke was able to name a huge number of people in his books, as paedophiles or murderers but without providing the evidence. How was this possible?

If there is evidence to support this has it been submitted to the police or published on the internet?

grannie27 17-07-2014 11:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the worm that returned (Post 1062164758)
I have always been intrigued as to how David Icke was able to name a huge number of people in his books, as paedophiles or murderers but without providing the evidence. How was this possible?

If there is evidence to support this has it been submitted to the police or published on the internet?

Controversial ......;)

grannie27 17-07-2014 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by garethicke (Post 1062164130)
Hi,
I have seen a fair few posts over the last day or two, flippantly throwing out names of potential paedophiles in the public eye.
Can we please not do that. If you have evidence that someone is guilty, present the evidence. But randomly throwing out names, with no evidence, can't be tolerated on this forum.

It is morally wrong, and potentially very harmful for all of us that use the forum.

Thanks folks.
Gareth

Hold on mate ...Your Dad has done this for decades ,he tells us loads... like the Royal Family are Lizard blood drinking satanical evil entities ,pretty sure he is right ,a bunch of cold blooded, money driven, kook bastards ....but proof ?
I dont remember his arse being dragged into Court ...Why Not ?

jake_ball 17-07-2014 11:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by garethicke (Post 1062164130)
Hi,
I have seen a fair few posts over the last day or two, flippantly throwing out names of potential paedophiles in the public eye.
Can we please not do that. If you have evidence that someone is guilty, present the evidence. But randomly throwing out names, with no evidence, can't be tolerated on this forum.

It is morally wrong, and potentially very harmful for all of us that use the forum.

Thanks folks.
Gareth

+1

moobs 18-07-2014 12:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by grannie27 (Post 1062165022)
Hold on mate ...Your Dad has done this for decades ,he tells us loads... like the Royal Family are Lizard blood drinking satanical evil entities ,pretty sure he is right ,a bunch of cold blooded, money driven, kook bastards ....but proof ?
I dont remember his arse being dragged into Court ...Why Not ?

Because nobody takes accusations of being a reptilian seriously. :p

mondogobbo 18-07-2014 05:31 AM

I agree. Being accused with pedophilia can potentially ruin your life, so I think we need strong evidence to do that. Here in Denmark there have been a few cases where Peoples life have been ruined because of false accusations of pedophilia. You have to be careful when you approach this subject.........

For example knowing a pedophile does NOT make a person a pedophile. I for example once knew a young man who turned out to be pedophile and I also once knew a guy who was into animal sex. I am NOT responsable for other Peoples actions, not even my friends or family members actions ;)

So having known Jimmy Saville does not make anybody a pedophile....., you need more evidence than just that.

i_am 18-07-2014 05:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by grannie27 (Post 1062165022)
Hold on mate ...Your Dad has done this for decades ,he tells us loads... like the Royal Family are Lizard blood drinking satanical evil entities ,pretty sure he is right ,a bunch of cold blooded, money driven, kook bastards ....but proof ?
I dont remember his arse being dragged into Court ...Why Not ?

That's not the point grannie. If David names people, then he, and only he is responsible. If David names people THEN it can be discussed on here. if neither he nor the MSM have named people, then we cannot allow it here. By doing so, we are putting the forum in jeopardy and in danger of being closed down, and the owner of the site being sued. Not you, the site owner.

So fair enough if he gets sued for what he says, but it is not fair that he should be sued for what others say.

Dude111 18-07-2014 07:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lobuk
Lets stick to facts backed by evidence as it says in the OP please.

I think thats the best way when talking about this stuff because ITS SO SERIOUS!!

steppewar 18-07-2014 08:07 AM

I think I know one famous pedo who will shortly be arrested, but I ain't doing no hints.

Libel laws are fucking ruthless.

limesub79 18-07-2014 10:42 AM

I agree if you think that someone is a pedophile then you can stand outside the houses of parliament protesting or visit your local police station with the evidence you've gathered etc... there's fuck all to stop you doing that except lack of evidence... I'm pretty sure DI doesn't make up a list without researching.

what's so hard about that?

the fat guy hanging around outside the school with shite catcher jogging bottoms and a trench coat on staring at children in the playground with his hand in his pocket still has to be caught out the same way as a celebrity/mp/and .....

that's why these cunts get away with it! the law is there to protect them, by us breaking the law!

the tealady 18-07-2014 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the worm that returned (Post 1062164758)
I have always been intrigued as to how David Icke was able to name a huge number of people in his books, as paedophiles or murderers but without providing the evidence. How was this possible?

If there is evidence to support this has it been submitted to the police or published on the internet?

I feel quite sure that if David had been asked by the authorities to provide the proof needed he could have done that. The key issue here is that NONE of them challenged him.

the tealady 18-07-2014 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by steppewar (Post 1062165251)
I think I know one famous pedo who will shortly be arrested, but I ain't doing no hints.

Libel laws are fucking ruthless.

Very wise, but when the story breaks properly, do tell :). I am all for naming and shaming proven perps.

dolores1 18-07-2014 12:16 PM

If we name them, then we are protecting these criminals! The law on lible is weighed in their favour.


D

greatdayforfreedom 18-07-2014 01:21 PM

I would like David to start naming new people as paedophiles/ child murderers. Providing David has the evidence, of course. He has never been sued for what he has said about Father Bush, Ted Heath, the Royals etc.

fairyprincess 18-07-2014 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by steppewar (Post 1062165251)
I think I know one famous pedo who will shortly be arrested, but I ain't doing no hints.

Libel laws are fucking ruthless.

Part of me would like to make hints. There's somthing funny about maybe getting away with it. These days I usually think better of it.......


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:29 AM.