David Icke's Official Forums (https://forum.davidicke.com/index.php)
-   9/11 & 7/7 (https://forum.davidicke.com/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   25 Second 9-11 Truth Test for All Your Friends & R (https://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=224648)

synergetic67 20-06-2013 01:54 AM

Abirato Radio Ep44 - June 09, 2013 - 9/11 September Clues Tour Guide


Tim reviews the September Clues Tour Guide with guest Aral Sea.





by Simon Shack - January 1, 2010


If you have come to terms with the fact that 9/11 was a massive money-making scheme and - of course - a pretext to wage hugely profitable wars, the basic rationale behind this Grand Deception should, hopefully, become clearer. It is essential to consider all the variables which such an audacious false-flag operation would entail and what precautions its plotters must have observed: The Grand Deception plan was undoubtedly meant to be foolproof and, ideally, free of unnecessary elements of risk and opposition. There was simply no rationale for the 9/11 plotters to commit a mass murder of some 3,000, mostly white-collar professionals (brokers, bankers, financial analysts, etc.) whose families would likely have access to first-rate, ‘uptown’ legal assistance. Surely, killing that many people would have been an utterly senseless, self-inflicted aggravation on the part of the perpetrators. Since they could reliably rely on the fully compliant ‘top-brass’ of the mainstream media, they would have used this unique, exclusive asset to its full potential.

Ever since day one, the major hurdle for many people to even start considering 9/11 being an ‘inside job’ has been: “I can’t believe my own government would murder 3000 of their own people". Once that psychological obstacle is removed, it should become apparent that the whole operation consisted essentially of a covert demolition of a redundant, asbestos-filled building complex. To kill thousands of people in the process never was an envisaged proposition as it would have encountered severe resistance among the insiders involved. The second objective was to blame this destruction on a foreign enemy; an inanely fanciful, outlandish tale involving hijacked airliners used as missiles was concocted, to be supported by digital imagery and special movie effects. How this was done is thoroughly illustrated in my September Clues video analyses.

WHAT DIDN’T HAPPEN ON 9/11 ( the deceptive imagery )

No unauthorized, private imagery was captured on September 11, 2001. Most - if not all - of the imagery we have of that morning’s events is prefabricated and/or manipulated. The September Clues video research – and many similar independent studies - have amply demonstrated the unfettered complicity of the mainstream media – a disturbingly 'reliable' partner in crime. The 9/11 morning broadcasts were, by and large, digital computer-animations and all successive, so-called “amateur” video snippets (featuring crashing planes or collapsing towers) have likewise been methodically exposed as a series of poorly crafted forgeries. The defining time-windows of the day (tower strikes and tower collapses) were certainly not meant to be captured on film - much less aired on television: As it is, no real footage of the real-life morning events is to be found. To be sure, the existence of specific, military-grade technology able to achieve this precise aim is well documented. In all likelihood, electromagnetic weaponry (EMP/HERF) routinely employed in war zones was employed, causing the temporary jamming of all unshielded camera equipment *. With no real footage being captured, the TV networks could ‘safely’ broadcast their substitute, artificial imagery of the morning’s events.

*see: Visual Control


WHAT DID HAPPEN ON 9/11 ( the tower collapses )

The ‘ground operations’ in Lower Manhattan called for a coordinated demolition of the entire WTC complex (9 buildings in all). Just what type of explosive forces caused this destruction is hotly debated among scientists galore – yet it is but a secondary and ultimately doomed endeavor - since there is no certifiably authentic rubble nor any authentic imagery to examine. We may however assume (as of the events’ timeline) that the demolition process started a full hour after the alleged “plane strikes”, leaving plenty of time to evacuate the area. The briskly displaced bystanders – as well as more distant eyewitnesses - would have had very slim chances to make out the precise dynamics of the collapses as, most plausibly, smokescreens (military obscurants) started blocking the WTC from view. The time-window of the Lower Manhattan evacuation was filled in with two convenient, yet blatantly phony Distraction Dramas: The Pentagon and Shanksville mock-events. These two diversions also helped sway the attention away from the absurd absence of helicopter rescues at the WTC. As it is, the improbable tale of 3,000 souls trapped for up to 100 minutes in the WTC top floors (with no rooftop rescues - “due to locked access doors") may have a simple explanation: The WTC towers were empty. To be sure, all photographs and video snippets depicting people (or silhouettes thereof) falling down the side of the WTC’s have also been comprehensively exposed as digital forgeries. Only time will tell whether anyone really was killed on 9/11 - and under what circumstances - but, as things stand, the bulk of available evidence suggests otherwise.


Perhaps – and probably - none. A ‘fanciful’ contention? No. Not if measured against the thoroughly fanciful, grotesquely contrived and conflicting 9/11 ‘victim memorials’. A close scrutiny of the numerous available listings of alleged 9/11 victims provides countless indications that they are, by and large, outright fabrications. Most of them are still easily accessible on the Internet by the general public – yet some have been (‘mysteriously’) shut down. Of course, if it’s true that the WTC was fully evacuated, thus follows that the many memorials listing the 9/11 victims must, in turn, be fabricated too. As elaborated below, that is precisely what they appear to be. The 9/11 victim memorials simply do not stand up to scrutiny and comparison. The sheer bulk of inconsistencies and absurdities pervasive in those unseemly listings unveils their true nature : Just another piece of the Grand Deception. Let us see why, point by point :

MEMORIAL PROBLEMS(1): The totals’ nonsense

At a first glance at the various 9/11 memorials, we see that each and every one reports a different casualty toll. Here’s a selection of total figures, all ostensibly meant to represent official and definitive listings of all victims of 9/11 for WTC, Pentagon and 4 flights (minus the “19 hijackers”) :

SEPT11th memorial: “3.181”

CNN memorial: “2.985”

Wikipedia: “2.977”

FOX News: “2812”

La Repubblica ( Sept11,’09 ): “2.752”

America Forever memorial: “2.467”

As absurd as this may seem, it is a fact that more than 8 years after 9/11, there is still no consensus whatsoever on the total death toll. Indeed, the first and last of the above-listed memorials show a discrepancy of a full 714 names! These are entirely verifiable figures – in full public view. Of course, even a discrepancy of only 2 or 3 victims should be considered unacceptable at this time. Let’s hope that the National 9/11 Memorial, currently under construction in Manhattan will finally reveal to the world the exact number of the 9/11 victims... Whatever that figure will be (and which names will be retained or discarded), the fact remains that for all of 8 years virtually all memorials have displayed wildly conflicting casualty tolls.

Most will remember that, in the days, weeks if not months following 9/11, the news media kept reporting what, admittedly, were speculative casualty figures ( the “20,000 victims" soon became “10,000”). Yet the first, official casualty toll was still a hefty “6,729” (New York Times). Then, a full 12 days after the event, mayor Giuliani went on record with an “estimated 6,333 victims”, a figure which was touted for some time before gradually - and inexplicably - dwindling to less than half that figure. How, one must ask, could it possibly take weeks to obtain reasonably accurate figures of the WTC tenants’ missing employees? Now, this was no tsunami sweeping unfathomably populated coastlines of Indonesia, Thailand or Sri Lanka; these were two confined building-collapses in civilized Manhattan! Undeniably, in the shocked post-disaster climate, the inflated death tolls effectively boosted the drama and the public outrage over the “murderous Binladen attacks”. However, as weeks went by, mayor Giuliani’s “6,333” estimate started raising a few eyebrows. In time, the news media came up with a ‘shocking news story’ : As the tale went, a horde of greedy, despicable fraudsters were usurping the 9/11 compensation funds claiming the loss of "non-existing, totally made-up relatives"


A long string of such scams were reported - & denounced with righteous outrage – for weeks on end. Ultimately, even though a whopping total of 400 such “callous con men schemes” were reported, it did little to account for – or even remotely explain – Giuliani’s previous “6,333” estimate (of September 23, 2001). The Grand Deception was already creaking and - unbeknown to most – initiating its own, inevitable collapse. Now, some people will argue that these wild inaccuracies were brought about by “the havoc and confusion” surrounding the 9/11 events. Fine. Let us not argue about it - and agree for now on at least one incontrovertible fact: Between the first official NYT death toll figure (6729) and the figure found on, for instance, the “America Forever” memorial (2467), we have a discrepancy/margin of error of 4262 ‘units’. These are plain and simple arithmetics. Lastly, let it be said that the vast majority of "9/11 victims" are NOT listed in the SSDI (Social Security Death Index). The few that ARE to be found listed on the SSDI are usually names that have been cited in the press, i.e. more 'prominent' and 'public' victims...

MEMORIAL PROBLEMS(2): The ghost names nonsense

So, how do these conflicting death tolls translate as one takes a close look at the various memorials? Does that mean we may find random, ‘ghost’ victims listed on some memorials, complete with tributes and obituaries, who are simply missing on others? Yes. Is there a significant amount of such nonsensical examples, such as to rule out ‘innocent sloppiness’ on the part of the various memorial curators? Yes. Let’s take a look, for instance, at the “Wall of Americans” memorial. At the very top of letter “A”, we find two people named “AALYIGH”.


Inexplicably, the two “AALYIGH”s (as indeed many other names) are found only in some memorials and are absent from others (such as CNN’s). Now, imagine for a minute that your surname is “Aalyigh”. Would you not try contacting (in over 8 years) the ‘offending’ 9/11 memorials and have them correct their listings? Who are the “Aalyigh”s? Or perhaps we should ask : why are the “Aalyigh”s to be found only in selected memorials? Is there indeed anyone called “Aalyigh” on this planet apart from Diana Aalyigh (Die-In-A-Lie?) and Justin Aalyigh (Just- In-A-Lie?). One may be tempted to surmise that some brave whistleblower was trying to tell us some truth about 9/11: “it’s all AALYIGH”. Interestingly, the Wall of Americans memorial has now been shut down. This is the message we may find on the blank Internet page which ‘explains’ its sudden closure:


Then, staying with letter “A”, there is the case of Mrs. “Cici AADA”, another of the many ‘ghost names’ to be found bouncing around the various 9/11 memorials. Now, if you google “AADA” you will bump right into the “American Academy of Dramatic Arts”.


A coincidence, perhaps. However, since a number of characters rotating around the 9/11 saga (Gary Welz, Bob McIlvaine, Donna Marsh O'Connor, etc) have been exposed as professional actors, one may reasonably wonder whether this also could be the work of a heroic whistleblower. The fact remains that “Cici (See-See?) AADA" and both the “AALYIGH”s are only to be found on a few 9/11 memorials – and are simply missing on others (most notably the CNN memorial).

There are plenty more examples of ‘ghost names’ appearing only in selected 9/11 memorials. To list them all in this article (with comprehensive cross-comparisons between all the lists) is not realistic and would surely be a tedious read. So let’s just compare three alphabetical groups (Q, X, Y, Z) which contain moderate amounts of names (so that the reader may easily check out these facts personally). Below is a list of 9/11 memorials; for each one we have the number of people listed under the surname initials “Q”, “X”, “Y” & “Z”:

CNN memorial:
Q:8 X:0 Y:20 Z:24


Q:8 X:0 Y:20 Z:25


Q:7 X:0 Y:15 Z:19


Q:16 X:0 Y:25 Z:26


FOX memorial:
Q:9 X:0 Y:21 Z:24


Q:9 X:0 Y:13 Z:23


Q:11 X:4 Y:24 Z:26


MEMORIAL PROBLEMS(3): The prosaic nonsense

A common aspect of the various 9/11 memorials are the consistently sappy and contrived tributes supposedly posted by families, co-workers and friends. We are talking about thousands of brief writings which, of course, require some steady patience to sift through. However, and for what it’s worth, I can personally testify that it’s hard to find any 9/11 tribute graced with any ring of authenticity. The prevalent impression is that they are written by the same person – or at best – by a gang of bored, unimaginative novelists. Naturally, some will retort that this is a ‘subjective’, personal interpretation; I can only encourage everyone to spend some time reading those tributes for themselves. Taken together, those tributes read like an endlessly reshuffled concoction of mawkish and tear-jerking rhetoric. I’m confident that anyone armed with a critical mind – and a healthy sense of humor - will actually enjoy sifting through these tributes as an eye-opening, entertaining and slightly surreal experience. Best of all, this ‘enjoyment’ comes with an odd sense of relief and appeasment as one gradually comes to realize that:

1. The 9/11 memorials are all in conflict with each other.

2. The 9/11 memorials are anything but credible tributes to real victims of a real terror attack.

3. Perhaps, in the light of these facts, few - or nobody - died in the “9/11 attacks”.

(Author’s appeal: I welcome anyone asserting to be a family member of a 9/11 victim to come forward with documentation – such as would be admissible in a court of law - of their loved one’s existence and passing. I can be reached on my private e-mail posted on the contact page.).


MEMORIAL PROBLEMS(4): The portrait-morphing evidence

Three main observations can be drawn from a methodical cross-scrutiny of the many 9/11 memorials which feature portraits of the “victims” – henceforth referred to as “entities":

1: Most of the “entities" found in the memorials are represented with two - and no more than two apparently different portraits.

2: When two seemingly different portraits of a given entity are compared, they reveal more often than not striking similarities in facial expression, pose, angle/perspective, lighting, reflections.

3. Striking similarities are also observed between separate, often alphabetically adjacent entities of same or different sex. While a few such cases might be expected in a list of 2500+ portraits, the sheer frequency of such instances featuring seemingly ‘cloned’ facial attributes cannot reasonably (in a statistical sense) be ascribed to ‘coincidence’ or ‘happenstance’.

Naturally, this topic needs to be visualized by the reader since it deals with photographic issues. Please see our illustrated article for image-supported descriptions of this issue: The Memorial Scams. (Other interesting issues related to the metadata - or ‘exif’ data - embedded in all the .jpg picture files will, in time, be comprehensively expounded and added to this article.)


Finally, for a comprehensive study of the 9/11 memorials, please download and read the “Vicsim Report" by Hoi Polloi: Vicsim Report page.



Some of the more prominent ‘casualties’ of 9/11 - such as “Flight93-hero Todd M. Beamer”- have long been exposed as stolen identities from previously deceased namesakes . The Barbara Olson story also turned out to be a fraud when Ted Olson (George W. Bush’s solicitor general) was caught altering 3 times his tale of her alleged phone calls from “Flight77”.

Similarly, “the 9/11 victim number 0001”, Father Mychal Judge, was another faith-based saga for devout believers: At least three different versions of the causes/circumstances of his death were published by the news media – and the evacuation of his corpse from the WTC has also been exposed as another staged photo-op. In other words, the stories surrounding the 9/11 “VIP" casualties are riddled with so many questions as to be divested of any sort of credibility. With such an abundance of deceptive, media-promoted bunkum, it is perfectly reasonable to question every single official newsstory to emerge from the events of September 11, 2001.



continued in the next post . . .

synergetic67 20-06-2013 02:01 AM

. . . continued from previous post



One question which naturally emerges from the study of the 9/11 memorials is : “Even if many ‘victims’ identities appear to be entirely made up by a computer database, could it still mean that a number of real people were killed on 9/11?” Or did 9/11 claim no victims at all?

If we are to apply a logical thought-process to this particular issue, we need to look at questions of strategy and opportunity which the perpetrators must have prefigured. Surely, any sensible investigation must start by defining the type of crime that is being investigated. By defining the scope and the objectives of the crime, we should be able to rule out what the perpetrators themselves would have ruled out, in terms of unnecessary risks and liabilites. Was 9/11 designed as a barbaric murdering spree or was it more of a gigantic bank robbery? Let us make an’ educated guess’ and say that the latter is the case.

Bank robberies are considered terrible failures by the robbers themselves in the event of any bystander, guard/police officer getting killed; the sole objective of a bank assault is that of stealing money – never that of commiting murder. The penal aggravations of manslaughter is most unwelcome to any professional gangster – a grave mistake to be carefully avoided. To be sure, there was no ‘added-value’ for the 9/11 perpetrators to commit a mass murder of some 3,000, mostly white-collar professionals. As we have seen, a large amount of alleged “victims" appear to be mock-up identities. Of course, precisely how many remains to be verified. Yet, consider this: if 300 deposit-boxes are emptied by a gang of bank robbers and fingerprints are found in just thirty boxes, would they be suspected only for robbing those thirty? Or would a court of law assume that they also robbed the other 270?

The idea that nobody was killed on 9/11 is, usually and predictably, rejected offhand by many folks as ‘outrageous’ or ‘unbelievable’. Others will accept that some simulation took place - but that a number of real people must have died. So let us imagine an ‘intermediate’ scenario of, say, 1000 people being killed that day. If this were true, an immediate problem emerges: what if those 1000 families, at some stage, discovered that the other 2000 families were untraceable/non-existent? It is quite unlikely that the 9/11 planners would have run the risk of such a dire, worst-case scenario: Imagine a horde of angry families filing an avalanche of executive court orders, all demanding access to public records and official verifications! Truly a recipe for disaster… Surely, the 9/11 plotters didn’t want any of that? Thus, we may reasonably assume that every precaution was taken to ensure that NO civilian lawsuits might ‘spoil the show’; in all logic, the assassination of any number of people on 9/11 was a definite no-no, a stupid and senseless aggravation to be avoided at all costs. The chief directive of the Grand 9/11 Deception plan may well have been: “Zero casualties”.


The almost unlimited resources of the 9/11 planners allowed for a multifaceted simulation which certainly involved a great many people by any conspiracy standards – only a few of which needed to be fully briefed about all details of the plan. A recurring objection skeptics keep raising is that “too many people had to be involved, therefore it would have been impossible to keep them all quiet.” Not so. Allow me to set forth a brief personal perspective on this issue: As the son of an idealist Norwegian sociologist who pluckily ‘fought’ the Sicilian Mafia with a typewriter, I often like to remind people of the concept of “omertà”; in Sicily, tens of thousands of honest citizens know perfectly well the names and whereabouts of the Mafia bosses – yet they are kept silent for decades with bribes and fear. Historically – and this is a nigh but undeniable fact - cold cash and hot threats have never failed to put a lid on people’s mouths.

A limited number of people were needed to pull off the 9/11 hoax – a hoax which relied on an incalculably larger budget than any smalltown Mafia hit. Needless to say, the US executive branch also firmly controls all key government-appointed agencies, an asset no criminal organization could ever dream of. Most importantly, every single major news corporation has been, in the last 50 years or so, thoroughly infiltrated and co-opted by the higher echelons of power. Today, their globalized monopoly of world news makes them the single most powerful persuasion-machine ever known to mankind. In fact, their unchallenged control of information was a crucial player in the 9/11 plan: Most lower-level operatives involved in the execution of the plan were induced - much as the average ‘Joe Public’ - to believe in the televised version of the events.

Hence, the “too-many–people-involved” argument fails on two counts:

1: It is effectively disproved by historical precedents.
2: It does not account for the wide, unprecedented range of assets available to the 9/11 planners.


To uphold and perpetuate the myth of the 9/11 victims, a grand ‘travelling circus’ was set up since day one and is still maintained to this day : A bunch of actors and actresses play the role of “mourning family members”, all of which get constant, extensive press coverage. An early team of ‘9/11 widows’ gained instant international fame: They were credited of ‘forcing’ the government to set up the 9/11 commission: The so-called “Jersey Girls” were portrayed as ‘left-wing activists’ who asked ‘inconvenient questions’. Of course, it was all a comedy of smoke and mirrors, a dog and pony show for public consumption. Here’s their Hollywood-style movie promoted on the “PRESS FOR TRUTH” website:


“The Jersey Girls” accomplished absolutely nothing in the way of obtaining serious answers from the government. Their role was ostensibly to enact and ‘give a face’ to the (non-existent) ‘grieving 9/11 families’. According to some 9/11 researchers, they are now living in luscious mansions even though they notoriously declined to collect monies from the 9/11 compensation fund. The “Jersey Girls” have gradually been ‘phased out’ from public visibility to make room for another set of “grieving mothers & widows”. Today, their roles are filled by the likes of Mary Fetchet, Carol Ashley & Carie Lemack:


THIS IS WHAT THEY DO : Improving Americas Security Act
What is their role and who do you think might be their handlers?


The pictures these women wear on their chests are in fact the very same we can find in the many 9/11 memorials. Incidentally, Mary Fetchet is the founder of the very active and prominent “VOICES OF SEPTEMBER 11 memorial” .


Mary allegedly lost her son Brad in the World Trade Center collapse. As many “9/11 victims”, most available pictures of Brad Fetchet are of very poor quality – and most show him in his childhood days. There seem to be very few portraits of Brad as a young adult.

Below is a reasonably sharp picture of Brad (“dancing with grandma”). It should be clear to anyone that this is a crude copy/paste job of Brad's face over an older gentleman with pronounced neck-wrinkles. The ‘matrix’ used for this sloppy montage is clearly extracted from the ubiquitous, familiar picture of the young “Brad Fetchet” to be found in all the memorials:


Sally REGENHARD is yet another “activist mother” cast in the role of “truth warrior” (Jersey Girls-style), brandishing ‘accusatory’ signs in public events - much as a heckling, hippie street protester ... On those occasions, Sally also tearfully carries along pictures of her alleged 'lost son':


However, there’s a problem with Sally’s story: there are very few pictures of her son ‘Christian’ – and most of them are obvious composites of the same ‘master portrait’. Below, we have three of them. I don’t think many comments are needed here - judge for yourself…


In conclusion, a whole lot of actors were (and still are) employed to sell the 9/11 Hoax to the public. From the short performances of alleged “eyewitnesses to crashing airplanes” seen on the 9/11 TV broadcasts, to the fake whistleblowers (such as Willy Rodriguez and Sibel Edmonds) - and all the way to the alleged “mourning family members” - all are just a bunch of 3rd rate actors and actresses willing to play out the Grand Deception Game for a fat pile of cold cash. Let us hope that actors of the caliber of Robert De Niro and Billy Crystal are not also part of the ‘game’. They both happen to be directors of the NATIONAL 9/11 MEMORIAL AND MUSEUM ...


A massive propaganda effort has relentlessly hammered into the public psyche the official September 11 saga. Countless lucrative films and documentaries have been produced over the years, casting actors in the roles of "real survivors and family members of the tragedy". Please watch my analysis of "911Hotel", a particularly crass propaganda film: PROPAGANDA911


Here is a fine summary / overview of the wider September Clues research. It is the work of Youtube user "Mack" who initially uploaded it on his channel. Later on, Mack inexplicably removed it from his channel, so this is a re-upload by our Cluesforum member Tufa:




Simon Shack, age 20, on top of WTC2
with New York ballerina

synergetic67 28-07-2013 07:19 AM

Simon Shack's WTC 7 Study :



Why have the fake videos of the WTC 1 & 2 collapses be 'top-down pulverizations' (never seen by anyone before except in predictive programming Hollywood special effects movies like "Independence Day") and that of WTC 7 (standard demolition) be different ? Just to fuck with people's heads, especially the heads of those in the alternative media, give them dead-ends to chase after, create more situations where "everything is believable and nothing is knowable." It would also get idiots asking "Why would they need to fake WTC 7 when it was a standard demolition and they could just get someone to film it" ? Because the actual event (nothing but the demolition of 9 buildings in a blocked-off area of Manhattan) would not match up with the trauma-inducing movie of the event made ahead of time to psychologically manipulate billions of people to feel and then act a certain way. This stupid question also serves as a block to prevent them from analyzing the videos and seeing that they don't match up and they're all clearly faked. Even when a guy like Simon Shack does the analyzing for them and proves the videos fake, this cognitive dissonance block prevents them from acknowledging the truth and to instead call him a 'disinformation agent.'


"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." - Arthur Schopenhauer

synergetic67 01-08-2013 05:30 PM

Abirato Radio 07 / 28 / 2013 - ep52 - 9/11 amateur photographer (and professional musician) Guillaume Perret


We talk with ElSushi, Guillaume Perret, and Simon Shack about Guillaume’s photos which he says he took on 9/11/2001.




Guillaume Perret & the Electric Epic "Kakoum" live @ Cabaret Sauvage / Jazz à la Villette 2012




maxine 01-08-2013 05:44 PM


Originally Posted by synergetic67 (Post 1061081895)
25 Second 9-11 Truth Test for All Your Friends & Relatives !

The great thing about this is that it will only take around 25 seconds to a couple of minutes of their 'oh-so-precious' time away from watching the crap on their TV, so they will almost always do what you say even to just get rid of you.

Have them watch this 25 second clip:

Would you believe this? - YouTube

let them watch it a few times if they want and then ask them what the video is asking which is

"If this happened tomorrow, would you believe it ? "

and see what they say.

It should be good for lots of laughs because if they have the brains to recognize this 25 second clip for the complete media fakery and forgery that it so obviously is (by the video maker - complete with fake headlines and CNN logo - CNN: Breaking News - F18 hijacked by Hamas terrorists - Iran is supporting terrorism on U.S. soil, a non-event, & audio transposed from the 9-11 newscasts in the background) then you can just tell them:

Well, this is what you saw on 9-11 as well, so why do you believe that ?

After which you can show them one of the ridiculously fake 9-11 clips such as this one:


and ask them why in the world would they not believe the one they just saw & believe the others from 9-11 ?

Then try not to laugh at the look on their faces as they try every lame excuse in the book to deny their own eyes and logic.:p

Interview with Simon Shack of September Clues - Brian S Staveley, Justin Cooke - 04 / 08 / 2012


Introductory Tour Guide to the September Clues research by Simon Shack - (updated on July 18 2011)


Would they believe this one?


Would they believe that some form of electromagnetic energy was used, to breakdown the materials of the World Trade Centre - including cold fusion! Would they believe that thermite was found in the debris?

synergetic67 02-08-2013 05:58 PM


Originally Posted by maxine (Post 1061649237)
Would they believe this one?

Would they believe that some form of electromagnetic energy was used, to breakdown the materials of the World Trade Centre - including cold fusion! Would they believe that thermite was found in the debris?

Oh no !!! Not the thermite-sniffers again. :p Of course !! They would and they have believed anything fed to them by controlled opposition stooges.

"No image-analyses of the tower collapses can help determine just what type of explosives were employed - since the videos are 3D animations and do not represent the real-life events."

Who cares how the towers were brought down when No-Planes and VICSIMS have already been conclusively proven ? Steven Jones thermite-sniffing and Judy Wood DEW fantasies (based on nothing but faked videos and photographs) are just two easter-egg hunt distractions for conspiracy hobbyists to embark on for over a decade and get lost in, instead of focusing on much more important matters that have already been proven, both with regard to the 'how' and 'who' of 9-11.

Dude111 03-08-2013 12:53 AM


Originally Posted by maxine
Would they believe this one?


Would they believe that some form of electromagnetic energy was used, to breakdown the materials of the World Trade Centre - including cold fusion! Would they believe that thermite was found in the debris?


They are so brainwashed by the official BS they cant see anything else!!

synergetic67 06-08-2013 09:15 PM


Originally Posted by synergetic67 (Post 1061649225)
Abirato Radio 07 / 28 / 2013 - ep52 - 9/11 amateur photographer (and professional musician) Guillaume Perret


We talk with ElSushi, Guillaume Perret, and Simon Shack about Guillaume’s photos which he says he took on 9/11/2001.




Guillaume Perret & the Electric Epic "Kakoum" live @ Cabaret Sauvage / Jazz à la Villette 2012




The mp3 link above seems to have been moved around or deleted by that dufus that runs Abirato radio with no reason given.

Here's a new permanent link uploaded from my hard drive:



07august 15-08-2013 10:42 PM


Originally Posted by synergetic67 (Post 1061082680)

I don't get why you posted this video. The guy who made it should have edited it or put it on a script to read. Too wordy, vague. All the he said about Gelitin was wrong. Why bother making a video with more wrong information.

I have no compassion for those who complain about wrong information, then put out erroneous information themselves.

The towers were gutted, prepped & planted with explosives. Arnon Milchan (Hollywood producer/Israeli spy) procured nanothermite from an Israeli nuclear lab for the 911 demolitions. Ann Cappelletti & Barbara Bush are illegitimate witch daughers of Aleister Crowley, conceived w sex magick at Abbey of Thelema and in Paris with their mothers. in 1923 & 1924, respectively. Ann & Barb got together in 1970s to set this ritual of ushering in of the Antichrist into motion. John/Mike (Bush cousins, all Crowley grandsons) Cappelletti's demolition company (home base: Upper Darby, PA--90 miles from NYC) got the demolition job from the CABAL. Ann was a powerful witch until she had her witch powers taken away in 2007. The reason there was little debris for 2 110 story buildings was because they were gutted in preparation for the planned 911 demolitions. All offices were vacated. World Views art students sponsored by Lower Manhattan Cultural Council sponsored & gave living space & stipends to students in their World Views art project. Students Gelitin had their work space on floor 91. Windows of the world was not open. It did not open until 9:30. Everything was planned & staged before 911.

The WTC was hollow, gutted before 9/11: no debris

Photos & videos were manufactured as FAKE evidence for the lies of the CABAL. 1/2 of the people involved with staging lies & propaganda for 911 are witches. The other half, American witches--of which they are many. There are witches all over the world. Ann Cappelletti knows all of them.

911 vacant towers/Silverstein Lowy Eisenberg
This is the 1st research I posted on DIF. If you start at the beginning of the thread, you may get more understandin.

There is a lot of fake information to sift through, U.S. media information is all lies supporting the government lies. Media is involved in this mega ritual. Many use the occult to get jobs, fame & money. If you know filmmaking & television production, you can understand how recorded information can be manipulated.

synergetic67 15-08-2013 11:22 PM


Originally Posted by 07august (Post 1061675635)
I don't get why you posted this video. The guy who made it should have edited it or put it on a script to read. Too wordy, vague. All the he said about Gelitin was wrong. Why bother making a video with more wrong information.

I have no compassion for complainers about wrong information, who put out erroneous information themselves.

What are you talking about ?

Ricefoot is Brian S Staveley, one of the first guys who interviewed Simon Shack (interview is linked above), notorious for never giving interviews for many years. That's a basic 101 video, obviously not comprehensive but very good for an introduction. It gives a good overview for the beginner FROM A MEDIA FAKERY perspective rather than from the falsely and deliberately implanted plane-hugging perspective of Loose Change and its many imitators. It's one that I myself found more than a few faults with, but which I also learned quite a bit from at the time that I watched it over a year ago.

Here's a far better audio he did a while later where he comprehensively deconstructs the entire 9-11 PsyOp and only makes one major mistake which Simon corrected for him on the forum:

Brian Staveley on Abirato Radio - 11 / 24 / 2012 -


Note: Brian Staveley makes a mistake on the audio calling "Mark Humphrey" the 'Harley Guy'. It has been conclusively proven that the 'Harley Guy' was NOT Canadian actor Mark Humphrey but was in fact, a FOX employee called MARK "PSYCHO" WALSH:





Brian was praised more than once by Simon Shack himself as an articulate spreader of the September Clues research until that big pussy Hoi Polloi (Max Konrardy, Simon's second in command, whose main claim to fame is that he went to Italy for 6 months and helped Simon write the notorious VICSIMS report, see posted above in this thread), in a completely unprovoked and bizarre chimp-out, started turning against him and calling him a 'simulated identity':


and when proven wrong with videos, photos and even offers to meet forum members in person by Staveley, simply banned him and refused to admit he was wrong.

As far as I'm concerned, this kind of phenomenon can only be interpreted in two ways:

1) An obviously staged drama designed to make the entire research look ridiculous under the guise of 'protecting the research' by a high level infiltrator

2) Childish bullshit by ego-tripping useful-idiot forum moderators unable to admit defeat or the humility of having been passionate but dead wrong.

Here's only one of Staveley's videos proving, without a shadow of a doubt, that he was not a 'Sim' as Maxy boy claimed:


Of course, anybody that came to Staveley's defense, including one of their best image-archivers, a hard-working young guy from Australia named Equinox, was also banned.

Needless to add, the core of Simon's research remains solidly knowable, valid and undebunked despite all this other damaging bullcrap pulled by his more mentally unstable collaborators (Hoi, brianv, fbenario, Maat, lux, etc.). Direct agent or useful idiots, the result is the same. As the old saying Fatso Shill Fetzer has repeated many times goes, the objective of disinformation is: "making everything believable and nothing knowable," and the more doubt they can help spread and plant in people's heads in a place where doubt has tended to be minimized with facts and logic, the better their mission of divide-&-conquer is accomplished.

howie 15-08-2013 11:38 PM

The Hollow Towers & the VicSims are the key to 9/11, they are busted now, just some fine tuning of the remaining facts need to be done.

Unfortunately the childish infighting of most 9/11 sites against each other is stopping the truth from coming out.

Fetzer & Webfairy are 2 of the most obvious gatekeepers.

synergetic67 16-08-2013 01:41 AM


Originally Posted by howie (Post 1061675727)
The Hollow Towers & the VicSims are the key to 9/11, they are busted now, just some fine tuning of the remaining facts need to be done.

Unfortunately the childish infighting of most 9/11 sites against each other is stopping the truth from coming out.

Fetzer & Webfairy are 2 of the most obvious gatekeepers.

Yes. Fetzer proved himself a gatekeeper when he defended William Rodriguez as an 'honest guy' and when he refused to look into the September Clues VICSIMS report after directly challenged by Brian Staveley.

Web Fairy, Paula Gloria and Nico Haupt I think are just a bit too crazy to matter much and for anyone to be able to tell if they're deliberate gatekeepers or not.

Ace Baker is an obvious gatekeeper of the VICSIMS report (he still believes 3000 people died somehow, not just in the buildings but even in planes that were flown somewhere else and the people on them killed, LOL ) and all the proven NON-PLANE fakery directly linked to and posted on this very thread.

Ace Baker is thus proven to be 100% a fraud and a high-level infiltrator, plagiarist and derailer of Shack's research.

sarge sharpei 16-08-2013 04:57 PM


Originally Posted by howie (Post 1061675727)
The Hollow Towers & the VicSims are the key to 9/11, they are busted now, just some fine tuning of the remaining facts need to be done.

Unfortunately the childish infighting of most 9/11 sites against each other is stopping the truth from coming out.

Fetzer & Webfairy are 2 of the most obvious gatekeepers.

Yep. And its intentional. The perps are seeing no one is buying their crap. All media included. Esp. propaganda trash in the US.

Clearly they're getting desperate. Piers Morgan and charlie sheen:rolleyes::rolleyes:

Morgan is a POS from Rupert Murdoch slime machine. Trust no one except valid sources.

synergetic67 12-09-2013 04:14 PM


Abirato Radio - August 17, 2013 - Ep56 - Guest: Lenon Honor



September 11, 2001 - what was its lingering impact on the psychological condition of the human species ?

Sensory overload and deliberately propagated contradictory information.
The conscious mind operates to define undefined elements and to solve problems. It is aware of time, past, present and future.

The subconscious mind is not aware of time and its pre-eminent occupation is to protect the conscious mind from experiencing levels of psychological trauma.

When do we experience levels of psychological trauma ?

We experience levels of psychological trauma whenever we cannot define an undefined element or whenever we cannot solve a problem.

September 11th was an undefined element and a problem that we could not define for three main reasons and therefore could not solve.

The three main reasons why the conscious mind could not process the trauma of September 11, 2001 were:

1- Sensory overload and media saturation - which means your senses are overloaded with too much information and input and, as a consequence, you begin to experience psychological trauma since your conscious mind can't define undefined elements and solve problems if it's receiving too much information at the same time.

2- Conflicting and contradictory information - there was so much conflicting information being propagandized at first by the mainstream media, later on by the alternative media also, that the conscious mind was again unable to define undefined elements out of all this conflicting information and experienced more psychological trauma. Too much conflicting information, in-and-of-itself, almost makes it impossible to define undefined elements and solve problems.

3- The intellectually stifling emotion of fear promoted by fear-mongerers - this does not encourage the intellectual or critical process since a strong emotion of fear always stimulates in the subconscious mind a program that's inherent in the species called 'fight-or-flight.' Whenever we are triggered in this way, we are put in a state where we have to decide whether we are going to fight or we are going to flee.

On 09 / 11 / 2001, were we fighting ? No, we were fleeing. We externalized our identity onto those people (in the pre-manufactured 9-11 movie) running down the streets, they became us. We were not fighting anywhere.

In point of fact, in terms of the psychic atmosphere of September 11th, the lack of military response, from the beginning, alluded to the notion that we were in 'a state of flight,' collectively and as a nation, if you will, and then when broadcast to the global population, extended that 'state of flight' globally.

When you are in a state of 'flight,' you are not thinking intellectually, you're just trying to run and get away. You are in the process of moving away from whatever it is that you perceive to be so much more powerful than you, which you've externalized power to.

So these three elements, sensory overload, conflicting information and the stifling emotion of fear, work to compromise the conscious mind's ability to process the trauma of September 11th.

The question at this point becomes: where did that trauma go ?

Well, as we stated before: the subconscious mind is not aware of time and its pre-eminent occupation is to protect the conscious mind from experiencing levels of psychological trauma. So whenever you can't consciously define undefined elements and solve a problem, as in the case of September 11th, your subconscious mind will take the undefined elements of the unsolved problem, submerge it within the subconscious mind and begin to resolve it there. Therefore, through this submersion, your conscious mind is freed, and can continue to proceed to other things, without maintaining the disposition of psychological trauma.

The conscious mind can only think about one thing at a time, whereas the subconscious mind can think of all kinds of things at any given time and many different things at many different times.

If you think about the main problem in your life that you have been unwilling to solve, and we all have them -- some of us have problems we have been trying to solve for years, some for decades -- and imagine consciously holding only the thought of solving that problem in your head without being able to think of anything else, only trying to define that undefined element and nothing else 24 hours a day, you would literally go insane.

People who do go insane often do so because of an imbalance between their conscious awareness and their subconscious mind. There are aspects of their problems that are stuck in their conscious awareness and they maintain it there constantly. That's all they think about and these problems are not being submerged into their subconscious mind. Their whole orientation is based upon a problem and therefore they begin to express, as a form of behavior modification, the mannerisms and the behavior patterns associated with a problem that is centralized in their conscious awareness as the only thing they think about.

The point is that the subconscious mind, its objective is to take that issue, problem or trauma, submerge it within the subconscious, where you don't have to think about it 24 hours a day, and it will process it there and try to define the undefined elements and solve the problem gradually, so that your conscious mind can move on to something else.

So where did the trauma of September 11th go ? It was submerged within the subconscious mind or what is called the collective subconscious. Once submerged within the global population's subconscious mind, it would have taken some time to define all the undefined elements, get rid of all the contradictions, and would have eventually resolved itself.

However, the mass-media conditioning juggernaut cannot allow this resolution to take place and makes a concerted effort to re-traumatize the world's collective subconscious. Since the subconscious mind cannot tell the difference between past, present and future, these re-traumatizations make the subconscious think that September 11th is happening again.

1) Installation of the 9-11 fear-based mind-control program involved:
Sensory overload

Conflicting information
Submersion of unresolved trauma of the event into the subconscious mind for eventual resolution

2) The triggering of the 9-11 fear-based mind-control program:

You trigger the trauma unconsciously on an ongoing basis and especially at specific times during the year with all kinds of fake and manufactured 'trigger stories,' so that people begin to feel the same emotions that they felt on September 11, 2001. These 'trigger stories' trigger the subconsciously embedded trauma of 9-11 which has been left unresolved. When you continue to re-trigger the trauma, what you're really doing is retraumatizing the subconscious mind.

These re-triggerings are done through a slow buildup of these fake planted 'trigger stories.'

For example, within the four weeks leading up to the May 2nd, 2011 supposed death of Osama Bin Laden, a totally staged PsyOp, we find the steady buildup of Osama Bin Laden related stories in the news. Topics include:

Stories about Osama Bin Laden
Stories about Al Qaeda
Stories about Seal Team 6
Stories about Terror threats, Imminent threats, Cyber-terrorism, Arab spring and Plane problems.

It's not that trigger-stories like these don't come out at other times in the year but what we find here is a concentration of these types of stories leading up to a major PsyOp.

If you know someone's trauma and they don't know their trauma, you can trigger their trauma and then, based upon how you trigger their trauma, you know they will react in a pre-determined way. It's like a chess game. If you know someone's move in advance and you know you can trigger them to move in that way, you can win every single time.

When you traumatize or retraumatize someone, they feel fearful. Once they feel fearful, they externalize power, and once they externalize power, you maintain administrative control.

Within the six weeks leading up to the anniversary of September 11th, 2001 every year, the news-media goes into its trigger-story cycle and build-up. Topics include terror threats, cyber threats, bomb threats, breast-implant bomb threats, stories about Al Qaeda, TSA and plane problems, National Security issues, credible but 'unconfirmed' threats, etc.

'Credible' but unconfirmed threats are conflicting information designed to give direct access to the mass subconscious. How can something be credible but unconfirmed ? It can't ! That's just totally contradictory doublespeak. Doublespeak and contradictory sentences access the subconscious directly. Why ? Because the conscious mind cannot define a contradictory or undefined element. It cannot solve a problem that's not even operating on a logical plane.

The daily barrage of confusing and contradictory information presented by the Mass Media is anything but an accident or due to incompetence. It is actually a precise science meant to bypass the intellect and access the subconscious directly.

You cannot get to the 'truth,' any truth whatsoever, based on trauma, fear and emotionalism. You have to heal the trauma first and then and only then can you apply the necessary intellectual process to define the undefined elements and solve the problems of this or that 'truth.'

Trauma comes in all sizes. It can be an event as big as the 9-11 PsyOp or as small as a punch in the face.

Extreme levels of fear, the whole paradigm of fear really compromises the intellectual process to the point where we begin to consider things that we don't have any proof for as real.

If you don't have conclusive evidence or proof of something, ultimately that information will cause fear because you don't know exactly what took place. In the absense of knowing exactly what took place, in the midst of only hearing theories that make it seem like there's something out there more powerful than you, you will always be traumatized, always be fearful, always externalize power and always be controlled.

The protocol for mind control = you must always traumatize someone

When we are traumatized (like we were traumatized by the events shown on TV on September 11, 2001), out of the trauma comes forth fear and out of the fear comes forth the externalization of power.

Whatever you externalize power to, whether that is to the Build-a-Burgers, reptilian shape-shifters, the New World Order, or whatever the case may be, it makes no difference because as soon as you externalize power you're already in a state of control.

When you invest a lot of time and become engulfed in only a few areas of research, you always run the risk of subjugating the intellectual process and letting it become an emotional thing.

When we talk about mind control, we're talking about tapping into the emotions of the individual and especially tapping into a very specific emotion, that of fear.

When a person is in a state of fear, their whole physical chemistry changes and it adapts to that emotion. This puts them in a 'fight or flight' mode. When we're in 'fight or flight' mode as result of the pre-eminent emotion of fear having been stimulated, we're not thinking critically.

The pursuit for truth with regard to 9-11 has put many in contact with all kinds of theories. Most of these theories are deliberately planted false memes with the ultimate goal of confusing researchers (making everything believable and nothing knowable).

You will find that a lot of people who get into all this 'alternative information' recognize, when they come out of that process, that it was the paranoia induced by this information that made them disconnect from the 'matrix' reality of others and lose relationships and friends without realizing they were caught in a similar fear-based 'matrix' of their own.

People who are given a constant dose of fear propaganda get addicted to that physiological response. This makes them pursue anything that can provide them with that high. That high is based upon the emotion of fear. In pursuit of this high, they will systematically look for all the latest conspiracies to put them in a state of fear and as soon as that state of fear wears off, look for more conspiracies to restore it. When a person gets stuck in this vicious cycle, they are no longer fulfulling the need to find truth but fulfilling the need to be fearful. And whenever we're fearful, we externalize power and then we're in a state of control.

These people may think that they're liberated, may think that they're 'awakened,' as they go around and yell at other people and call them sheeple, but they don't realize that they too are being manipulated by their need for fear propaganda.

The 'need for fear' can work in part like the old joke: "Why do you keep hitting your head against the wall ? Because it feels so good when I stop." This is because we can be conditioned in a particular way where we are encouraged to confuse fear with truth.

When you equate seeking truth with heroism and truth and fear are confused, then the more fear you bombard yourself with, the more self-esteem you have as 'a heroic truth-seeker' but this self-esteem is paradoxically disabled from any real productive and rational action by the same high levels of fear that produced it.

We can also be conditioned to confuse pain with love.

When a child is abused by their parents, in the child's mind on a subconscious level, when they see the parent that's beating on them say "I do this because I love you," they become confused and they associate pain and suffering with love. Later on, when the child comes of age they look for relationships that fulfill the same model or relationships where they can be abused. The emotion of love is thus conditioned to be triggered only when pain is also present. Through this very common conditioning, abuse is perceived as reflective of someone loving them just like the fear-mongering of the alternative media is perceived as reflective of finding truth. It's not about 'truth,' it's about the conditioning that people have received for years, decades, sometimes many decades that will cause them to continue to pursue fear-based programs and consider these to be somehow 'the truth.'

You can't find 'truth,' when you're in the process of being traumatized and re-traumatized and the whole process is really about fulfilling this need to be fearful.

One of the things that happens to people when they get to that point where fear becomes their paradigm is that it's so much easier to have this orientation where you perceive yourself to be the perpetual victim. When you perceive yourself as a perpetual victim, then you don't have to be personally responsible.

The pre-eminent emotion that is being stimulated is that of fear

Alex Jones' information is not intellect-based. It doesn't cause people to think intellectually. It causes people to react emotionally. The pre-eminent emotion that he projects is fear.

If something is putting you in a state of fear, if it's sensationalized, that's not an intellectual process.

What 'alternative' really means is demographically specific programming.

supervillian archetypes = boogie men

Many people today have been raised on realistic video games.

People have been led to blur the line between reality and fantasy. It blurs the line between what's virtual and what's substantive.

If you're running a psychological operation, you're managing people's perceptions.

People who buy into an illusion will be extremely upset with you when you point out their fraudulent purchase years later because they are still under mind control and are reacting based upon their trauma-induced subconscious programming. They made a choice that THEY THOUGHT was a conscious choice but in actuality was an emotional choice made for them through trauma and later constant subconscious re-triggerings of the same. Their ego being nestled in their subconscious automatically reacts with hate towards anyone that exposes the fact of their bamboozlement and conditioned inability to define the undefined elements and solve this problem, their lack of resolve and resolution.

There is a big difference between making a conscious choice and being led to believe you're making a conscious choice.

One of the reasons the media presents so much of its programming in the form of fear is that it reaches into the animalistic qualities inherent in the human being and if you want to keep the population in control, they must be operating on an animalistic level. Just like you put animals in cages to control them, well, instead of putting human beings in cages, you put a cage around their perception, you manage their mind and their perception of reality
It's never SIMPLY about the story. It's about WHEN stories are issued and HOW they're associated with each other based around a MAJOR event, real or manufactured: supposed death of Osama bin Laden, 2012 Olympics, Presidential elections, Y2K. The TIMING of these stories is often more important than the stories themselves

The media events run in CYCLES and there are people who jump aboard that cycle until the media turns it down and starts another cycle and then people jump onto that one. The TIMING of stories is centered around particular CYCLES of programming. There are yearly programs and there are decade programs that get re-installed whenever triggered

You're not 'fighting' anything when you go out to fight the New World Order, you're just externalizing power

Out of the trauma, comes forth fear, and out of the fear, comes forth the externalization of power. And once we externalize power, whether it is to the Buildaburgers, reptilian shape-shifters, the New World Order, etc., now we're in a state of control

9-11 = greatest fear-based mind-control program of our time, a program that is re-installed & retriggered every year in the weeks leading to September 11th with many fake news stories. It's trauma-based mind-control programming that MUST be re-installed every single year and retriggered or the subconscious mind will start resolving itself in the absence of new triggers and people will start asking more and more critical questions on the conscious level. They will start breaking their mind control programming and the legitimacy of the official fable will come under question.



Abirato Radio 09 / 07 / 2013 - Guest: Justin Cooke - the 9-11 truth movement on the 12th anniversary of the 9-11 PsyOp



"There are people out there that take the words or the themes or the memes that we are trying to get out and twist them, and wreck them, and then we can't use them."

"People tend to have a problem believing that those who rule over us are this smart. Because, in each and every PsyOp, we are simultaneously sold the theory, the meme, that those that rule over us -- the government, the actors, the clowns -- are incompetent. They couldn't put two plus two together, they couldn't do this !!"

In the 9-11 PsyOp, we were simultaneously sold the meme that they were somehow stupid enough to make the mistake of demolishing building 7 at a later time in the day and have a BBC reporter announce it before it was demolished and not only that but they were incompetent enough to have Silverstein go on PBS of all places (lol) and admit to having 'pulled it.' Nonsense.



synergetic67 12-09-2013 07:31 PM

Repost of all the important video links that have mysteriously gone AWOL and are no longer directly accessible from the previous posts on this thread, plus most of Shack's other 9-11 video studies:

Ricefoot's The Real Truth Behind The Illusion Of 9/11 - (basic 101 video for beginners from media fakery angle)



911 AMATEUR part2 by Simon Shack - (the most important 7 and a half minutes of film made exposing the 'how' of the 9-11 PsyOp)




NOSED OUT - Simon Shack



911 ACTORS - Simon Shack


SSDI = Social Security Death Index

Neither of the first two people Bob McIlvaine and Marsh-O'Connor are sobbing over on multiple media channels in the above video are even on the social security death index, never mind that they certainly do not have death certificates.

Try putting the names of anybody you know that has died (unique names are much easier to find, with a common name you'll have to go through thousands of names sometimes), in the SSDI and see if doesn't come up:



The 9/11 VicSims Report - An Introduction


"I did an exhaustive check of the list of victims provided on the CNN website. What I found is that out of 2,970 people listed, only 446 appear in the Social Security death index. Of those only 249 have a confirmed death certificate on file. Of those, not a single one has a valid “last address of record” on file."~ Ersun Warncke, Salem News - Independent confirmation of the 'Vicsims Report' - 9/11 Reflections Part 2: Interview with Simon Shack of September Clues

So, NOT A SINGLE ONE of any of the so-called 9-11 'victims' has ever had a 'last address of record' on file, no one even knows where they really lived, and DESPITE THIS, without the slightest investigation or checking of facts, almost everyone in the world just takes the media's word for it that these people really existed and really died and that the clowns on TV pretending to be their 'grieving relatives,' really are who they say they are.




9-11 PROPAGANDA - Simon Shack


CHOPPED OUT - Simon Shack


FOXED OUT part1 - Simon Shack


FOXED OUT part2 - Simon Shack


911 AMATEUR part1 - Simon Shack


911 AMATEUR part3 - Simon Shack



FOX FLOP - Simon Shack


Published on Dec 31, 2012

The WNYW FOX5 Sept 11 2001 broadcasts have only recently (2012) been added to the official 9/11 TV archives. However, all of 43 minutes of the crucial early hours have been simply BLANKED OUT by WNYW FOX5 - and unsurprisingly so: As it turns out, they contain countless clues as to the TV networks' full complicity with the disgraceful 9/11 psyop. As it is, those missing 43 minutes (that FOX don't want you to see) can still be found on a continuous 2-hour video uploaded on a German YT channel:



BLANKED OUT version on 9/11 TV ARCHIVE :


SOME BIRDS - Simon Shack


The Grand TV Illusion - Simon Shack


FLIGHT 3407 STUDY (& what it has to do with 9-11) - Simon Shack


9/11 Synchronized Shared Media


The 9/11 Synthetic Scenes









synergetic67 13-09-2013 11:14 AM

Repost of the original post of this thread which has now been made completely nonsensical due to the video posted mysteriously going AWOL into some software bug black hole of apparent no return:

25 Second 9-11 Truth Test for All Your Friends & Relatives !

The great thing about this is that it will only take around 25 seconds to a couple of minutes of their 'oh-so-precious' time away from watching the crap on their TV, so they will almost always do what you say even to just get rid of you.

Have them watch this 25 second clip:


let them watch it a few times if they want and then ask them what the video is asking which is:

"If this happened tomorrow, would you believe it ? "

and see what they say.

It should be good for lots of laughs because if they have the brains to recognize this 25 second clip for the complete media fakery and forgery that it so obviously is (by the video maker - complete with fake headlines and CNN logo - CNN: Breaking News - F18 hijacked by Hamas terrorists - Iran is supporting terrorism on U.S. soil, a non-event, & audio transposed from the 9-11 newscasts in the background) then you can just tell them:

"Well, this is what you saw on 9-11 as well, so why do you believe that ?"

After which you can show them one of the ridiculously fake 9-11 clips such as this one:


and ask them why in the world would they not believe the one they just saw & believe these others from 9-11 ?

Then try not to laugh at the look on their faces as they try every lame excuse in the book to deny their own eyes and logic. :p

synergetic67 27-09-2013 04:13 AM

Abirato Radio - 09 / 14/ 2013 - ep63 - 9/11 with Jason Erb and Rollo


"I know all their words are there deliberately because they don't hide anything, everything is above board, it's just that you don't know the meaning of the word in a lot of ways. And part of the scam is: they tell you what they're doing to you, you just don't understand it, but they can point to it and say 'it's all here, it's all in black and white.' It's hidden in plain sight.

One of the things my research has led me to is that these PsyOps are usually done within the parameters of their laws. Luckily, one of their laws is that they can't kill people (if faking their deaths will accomplish the same aims). See, I don't think anybody died on 9-11, because

1) that would be much harder to get people to go along with


2) it's illegal.

A lot of the things that you think they should be charged over, they can't be, because they didn't really do anything illegal. For instance, people ask: 'why didn't they scramble all the military planes, shouldn't they be charged with treason? ' Well, if there was no enemy attack, then what they did was perfectly legal and logical. They can't scramble planes if there are no planes to go chase after. So everything makes complete sense if you look at it through that paradigm." ~ Abirato, ep63b, at the 1 hour 3 minute mark



Abirato Radio - 09 / 21 / 2013 - ep64a - 9-11 with Aybesea




synergetic67 30-10-2013 11:21 PM

Dose of Reality Radio with James Sloan - 10-24-13 - the fake 9/11 phone calls/audio recordings from the non-existent "planes" and supposedly from inside the burning, smoke-filled towers (all miraculously recorded without a single cough ! ) examined and exposed for the frauds they are









synergetic67 18-11-2013 10:15 PM

Dose of Reality with Brian S. Staveley, Justin Cooke, James Sloan, Chris Kendall, etc. - 11 / 11 / 2013 - Guest James Fetzer put on the hot seat and interrogated on many points of shillery






synergetic67 18-11-2013 10:21 PM

Abirato Radio - 11 / 16 / 2013 - ep76 - Guest: Simon Shack - Simon and Tim review the latest reappearance of September Clues plagiarist and limited-hangout shill Ace Baker aka Collin Alexander






All times are GMT. The time now is 04:42 PM.