Jump to content

9/11 was there a plane ?


James Freeman (of the land
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, zArk said:

 

you cant seriously believe that bumbling Fetzer and Reynolds are proper guys?

 

they were the 2nd barrage, the scholars for truth, who took over the distraction  after the 'in plane sight' celebrity gaggle of tits faded

 

however this reopening of the 'operation shutdown and control exposure of 9/11' bringing up the main characters is actually great and should be a good learning exercise for everyone

 

Im right then ............... you didn't read the chapter. No worries though, I'll continue to take all of your opinions as just that, OPINIONS, and not properly researched material.

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, zArk said:

state your point

 

Time/Space experimentation with high tension electromagnetic fields, all points in time and space are connected, whoops they found that out the hard way as they were looking into the possibility of cloaking technology from radar.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, zArk said:

should be a good learning exercise for everyone


Yes, you do not understand that one of the buildings fell at free fall speed, and in one instance faster than free fall speed according to seismic activity alone which also showed no evidence of controlled demolition compared to controlled demolitions analysed via seismic activity.

If you read the book you wouldn't be replying with this basic stuff.

Edited by TheConsultant
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

10 minutes ago, webtrekker said:

 

Ah, ok. So you didn't read the chapter I linked too then? Why am I not surprised?

 

 

 

jeeze, andrew johnson acting as a defender of Wood and Reynolds

hes soo far up Judys bum its pathetic.

 

Its a simple case of bombs in the WTCs and all the rest is cover up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

8 minutes ago, sock muppet said:

 

Time/Space experimentation with high tension electromagnetic fields, all points in time and space are connected, whoops they found that out the hard way as they were looking into the possibility of cloaking technology from radar.

 

and you think thats what blew up the WTC buildings on 9/11?

 

😬

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, zArk said:

 

 

jeeze, andrew johnson acting as a defender of Wood and Reynolds

hes soo far up Judys bum its pathetic.

 

Its a simple case of bombs in the WTCs and all the rest is cover up.

 

Haha! I love a good joke!

 

Anyway, here's something that those who do have more than 2 brain cells to rub together might find interesting...

 

http://checktheevidencecom.ipage.com/checktheevidence.com/pdf/Actonco2- Hurricane Erin - April-May 2009.pdf

 

 

 

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, zArk said:

 

 

and you think thats what blew up the WTC buildings on 9/11?

 

😬

 

Those buildings did not blow up as you put it, they turned to dust in mid air, watch as many video's that you can and ask yourself, "where is all the dust coming from".

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, zArk said:

 

 

and you think thats what blew up the WTC buildings on 9/11?

 

😬

 

Here's another thing to consider, early nuclear experimentation on splitting the atom was done by firing electrons at the atom which did indeed split the atom, but the yield in terms of energy was at best par with the energy used to split the atom.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, sock muppet said:

 

Those buildings did not blow up as you put it, they turned to dust in mid air, watch as many video's that you can and ask yourself, "where is all the dust coming from".

the buildings had lots and lots of low density concrete which was pulverised by bombs and the falling debris caused lots and lots of dust to be created.

 

Judy Wood didnt examine any of the rubble. It was managed and shipped off. She made wild speculations using low quality video and manipulated photo evidence.

 

What part of controlled crime scene did Judy forget to acknowledge?

The cops on 9/11 were under order to confiscate all cameras on new york streets and take all photos developed in the shops.

All videos were consficated and handed back at a later date

She focussed upon FEMAs released photos and NIST documents

 

and she conveniently ignored the fact that both WTC1 and 2 were overdue structural repairs.

 

Continued flogging of Judy bullshit is very very poor.

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, webtrekker said:

 

Haha! I love a good joke!

 

Anyway, here's something that those who do have more than 2 brain cells to rub together might find interesting...

 

http://checktheevidencecom.ipage.com/checktheevidence.com/pdf/Actonco2- Hurricane Erin - April-May 2009.pdf

 

 

 

 

they both are a good joke, Judy and Johnson.

Johnson chp 5 is all soooo "stop attacking Judy, focus upon her analysis"

chp 8 is all soooo "ignore the analysis and lets attack Simon"

 

Hilarious agenda driven.

 

Judy, Morgan, Fetzer, S. Jones, Kevin Barret are all controllers of information creating a false narrative around 9/11

 

fakes, agents, cointelpro,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, sock muppet said:

 

What on earth are you talking about?

you dont see an issue with Silver stein  mentioning 'by accident' WTC 7 pull it?

 

you dont think its a "look over here, not over there" moment?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, zArk said:

the buildings had lots and lots of low density concrete which was pulverised by bombs and the falling debris caused lots and lots of dust to be created.

 

Judy Wood didnt examine any of the rubble. It was managed and shipped off. She made wild speculations using low quality video and manipulated photo evidence.

 

What part of controlled crime scene did Judy forget to acknowledge?

The cops on 9/11 were under order to confiscate all cameras on new york streets and take all photos developed in the shops.

All videos were consficated and handed back at a later date

She focussed upon FEMAs released photos and NIST documents

 

and she conveniently ignored the fact that both WTC1 and 2 were overdue structural repairs.

 

Continued flogging of Judy bullshit is very very poor.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Its fair comment, but you do need to analyse with more scrutiny on the steel beams that were used to construct that building, those beams are impossible to just melt away to dust, where you are going wrong is assuming the entire building was made of concrete, when you see the true construction of the building and why it was constructed that way in the first place, which was in anticipation of a plane hitting them by their sheer height, this was a feature factored into its strength, built from the outside to inside, where most buildings are built around a central core and the rest of the building hangs off the central core, those buildings where the opposite in construction, and again the outer wall construction of steel beams would not have crushed in any way but rather peeled away like a banana skin effect.

 

Sorry but saying Dr Judy Woods interpretation of what was actually witnessed is showing your ignorance to defend your world view that is being challenged, even Judy says in the conference she held that new terminology had to be invented to correctly understand what was being witnessed, like 'dustification' this is not a joke and a version of this is in recorded history when people sailed the world to undiscovered countries in wooden sail ships, when encountering an indigenous tribe that had never seen a sail ship before they could not see the ship, to them it just looked like a floating island of tangled trees and sticks.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, zArk said:

you dont see an issue with Silver stein  mentioning 'by accident' WTC 7 pull it?

 

you dont think its a "look over here, not over there" moment?

 

 

 

Sorry but what part of 'pull it' are you not comprehending?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, zArk said:

you dont see an issue with Silver stein  mentioning 'by accident' WTC 7 pull it?

 

you dont think its a "look over here, not over there" moment?

 

 

I think you need to read the book before making yourself look increasingly incoherent. As I say stick to FE or by all means read the book and pull it apart bit by bit, always up for a discussion and I will happily do a deep dive with you if you wish?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, zArk said:

you dont see an issue with Silver stein  mentioning 'by accident' WTC 7 pull it?

 

you dont think its a "look over here, not over there" moment?

 

 

Honestly, wtf

wtc7 fell in freefall speed

 

what more obvious clues you need?

Edited by Youknownothingbutyou
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, zArk said:

and she conveniently ignored the fact that both WTC1 and 2 were overdue structural repairs.

They weren't structural repairs it was for the removal of asbestos ,both sheeting and pipe lagging

Edited by peter
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Youknownothingbutyou said:

Honestly, wtf

wtc7 fell in freefall speed

 

what more obvious clues you need?

yes ...... lets think about this one shall we....

 

WTC7 demolished freefall speed (or close to)= controlled demolition

 

WTC 1and 2 demolished freefall speed (or close to) = judy wood says DEW

 

??????

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, TheConsultant said:

I think you need to read the book before making yourself look increasingly incoherent. As I say stick to FE or by all means read the book and pull it apart bit by bit, always up for a discussion and I will happily do a deep dive with you if you wish?

discuss a book based upon FEMA photos and NIST information which is saying 'Inside Job'?

 

i think i see a logical error here, lets rehash

 

discuss a book based upon photos controlled and released by the bad guys and data controlled and released by the bad guys to derive a theory on how the bad guys performed the crime?

 

Its ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Talorgan said:

Not sure if anyone put this already here but won't harm to out it again that perhaps there were multiple charges And energy weapon simultaneously 

That's what I said ,not to confuse the sheep but to keep the truth seekers arguing between themselves, brilliant ploy in my opinion

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, zArk said:

yes ...... lets think about this one shall we....

 

WTC7 demolished freefall speed (or close to)= controlled demolition

 

WTC 1and 2 demolished freefall speed (or close to) = judy wood says DEW

 

??????

 

 

All three collapsed towers on 911 were controlled demolition….

 

im just surprised coming from you as i often agree with your views…

Edited by Youknownothingbutyou
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, sock muppet said:

 

Sorry but what part of 'pull it' are you not comprehending?

 

you really dont see the problem with the WTC7 focus?

Jane Standley reporting WTC 7 collapse, then silverstein mentioning 'pull it', NIST hosting the video on their online channels,

 

Suddenly you think the media, owner of WTC and authorities are exposing the lies???

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...