Jump to content

Cap'n Mac's Pirate Republic!


Recommended Posts

‘Net Zero’ Is WEF Plot to Destroy Food Supply

Frank Bergman
March 4, 2024 - 12:59 pm

The World Economic Forum’s (WEF) “Net Zero” agenda is actually a plot to destroy the food supply and eliminate the working class, a new report has warned.

An investigation by the Institute for Community Studies (ICS) found that unelected globalists at the WEF and United Nations (UN) are using “climate change” fears to seize control of the masses.

While establishing the UN as a single-world government to tackle “global warming,” the WEF is seeking to destroy the food supply as we know it and replace traditionally farmed meat and dairy with products for mass public consumption that are controlled by globalists.

In recent years, WEF elites have been attempting to demonize farming through fearmongering about “global warming.”

WEF members, such as Democrat President Joe Biden’s outgoing “climate czar” John Kerry, insist that traditional farming can be shut down and replaced because it fails to comply with “Net Zero” goals.

By banning meat and dairy products, globalists such as the WEF and Bill Gates (America’s largest farmland owner) can fill these large gaps in the food supply with their own manmade products.

In recent years, Gates has been busy promoting his lab-grown “meat” products that allow fake “beef” and “chicken” to be produced in factories without the need for livestock and farms.

The WEF, meanwhile, is pushing the meat and dairy products to be banned to “fight climate change.”

According to the WEF, the solution is to replace meat with insect-based “foods.”

A report from the ICS, titled “Our Journey to Net Zero,” concluded that the WEF is pushing “Net Zero” to “make the poor poorer, and push struggling communities further into deprivation and exclusion.”

The ICS report shows that the transition to Net Zero will cause a rise in unemployment, as carbon-intensive industries are forcibly restructured.

As a result, food will become limited and more expensive.

Meat and dairy products will become a luxury only the wealthy can enjoy while the general public will be forced to consume manmade processed “foods.”

The report warns that the “eco-friendly” changes that the public will be forced to make, such as insulating our homes or switching to electric cars, will be extremely difficult “for low-income households.”

The ICS concludes that the poorest 40 percent of households are at risk of “falling into transition poverty.”

As shocking as this statistic is, the report is no rant.

A team of researchers from ICS, Trinity College Dublin, and the universities of Leeds and York have thoroughly reviewed the policy changes and instruments – subsidies, taxation, and so on – most likely to prove effective in reducing emissions of CO2.

And they have concluded that these Net Zero measures will push down living standards for a lot of people in the United States and other Western nations.

Meanwhile, nations such as Communist China, which get a free pass on green agenda policies, won’t be affected by the “Net Zero” changes and their economies will be free to thrive.

Essentially, the general effect of Net Zero is similar to that of regressive taxation.

Just as a tax that is the same for everyone will most hurt those who earn the least, Net Zero policies mete out more pain to those who are least well-off.

This won’t just affect the very poorest though.

As the ICS warns, even “middle-income households that were not previously experiencing financial precarity” might struggle.

The report also highlights the other depredations brought about by Net Zero.

For instance, the added cost and difficulty of car travel will reduce people’s leisure opportunities.

The report certainly pulls no punches about the downsides of Net Zero.

But it does not challenge the green transition itself.

It instead calls for a “just” transition to ease the socio-economic pain caused – a spoonful of sugar to help the medicine go down.

The report even complains that the disadvantages brought about by Net Zero policies are being exploited “by those who are against the transition to Net Zero.”

Mentioning populist opposition to anti-car schemes like low-emission zones and low-traffic neighborhoods, it says that some activists are “provoking political flashpoints and civic revolts concerning ‘rights and freedoms’.”

To get around such opposition, the report calls for more popular participation in Net Zero policymaking.

The transition, it says, can be “managed more fairly with the voice and participation of the households and communities it affects.”

Yet in the context of a report exposing the terrible privations Net Zero will visit on society, this call for greater participation rings hollow.

It sounds like an attempt to mobilize the poor for their own impoverishment.

In truth, Net Zero will be an immiserating objective, no matter how it’s dressed up.

We are sleepwalking towards economic and social disaster.

It’s high time we woke up.


Electric cars release MORE toxic emissions than gas-powered vehicles and are worse for the environment, resurfaced study warns

By Nikki Main Science Reporter For Dailymail.Com

Published: 14:51 EST, 4 March 2024 | Updated: 17:36 EST, 4 March 2024

Electric vehicles may release more pollution than gas-powered vehicles, according to a report that has recently resurfaced.

The study, which was published in 2022 but has begun circulating again after being cited in a WSJ op-ed,  found that brakes and tires release 1,850 times more particulate matter compared to modern tailpipes which have filters that reduce emissions.

It found that EVs are 30 percent heavier on average than gas-powered vehicles, which causes the brakes and tire treads to wear out faster than standard cars and releases tiny, often toxic particles into the atmosphere.


  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/28/2024 at 2:56 PM, Macnamara said:


That is why i have explained in this thread that freemasonry, which the british royalty are the head of in this country, is descended from the knights templar who were themselves a kabbalistic, ceremonial magic order that came out of an area of france where there was a major kabbalah school, in troyes, run by rabbi rishi.


The templar order only allowed bloodline families to attain certain ranks and wear the white tunic. People who were not of the correct bloodlines could only wear black robes and could only attain the rank of sergeant. Those bloodline families were crypto-jewish families practising kabbalah behind closed doors. When the order was founded the first thing they did was to ask the king of jerusalem for permission to set up their HQ on temple  mount where they dug down to get items they knew had been buried there when the romans sacked the city in 70AD.


The templars were the knights of the temple of solomon and many of the british aristocracy are descended from them and today are freemasons. This is why you get prince andrew being pals with sabbatean jews like jeffrey epstein. They are all part of the same network of kabbalist magicians and they are all working to bring about the messianic age so that they can enslave the rest of humanity under their AI controlled technocracy. That's what 'net zero' and the 'great reset' is all about

The United Kingdom: Zionism’s Covert Nerve Center.

On 9 February, British Defense Minister James Heappey informed parliament that Israeli military operatives are “currently … posted in the UK,” both within Tel Aviv’s diplomatic mission “and as participants in UK defense-led training courses.” This hitherto unacknowledged arrangement amply demonstrates how despite recent calls from officials in London for Benjamin Netanyahu’s government to exercise restraint in its genocide of Gaza – if not institute a ceasefire – the UK remains international Zionism’s covert nerve center.

Mere days earlier, Heappey likewise admitted that nine Israeli military aircraft landed in Britain since Operation Al Aqsa Flood on 7 October last year. Investigations by independent investigative website Declassified UK show that Royal Air Force aircraft have flown to and from Israel in the same period, along with 65 spy plane missions launched from the UK’s vast, little-known military and intelligence base in Cyprus.

The purpose of those flights and who and/or what they carried are a state secret. Freedom of Information requests have been denied, Britain’s Ministry of Defense has refused to comment, and local media is by and large silent. 

Nonetheless, in July 2023, British ministers admitted that the UK’s training of Israeli military personnel includes battlefield medical assistance, “organizational design and concepts,” and “defense education.” It is unknown if that “education” has in any way informed the slaughter of more than 30,000 Palestinians since 7 October.

British military presence in occupied Palestine 

Yet, indications that London has long provided a highly influential guiding hand to Tel Aviv in its oppression and mass murder of Palestinians are unambiguous, even if hidden in plain sight. For example, in September 2019, the Israeli air force participated in a joint combat exercise with its British, German, and Italian counterparts. 

The Israelis deployed F-15 warplanes for the purpose, which have been blitzing Gaza on a virtually daily basis since 7 October, indiscriminately flattening schools, hospitals, businesses, and homes and killing untold innocents.

A year earlier, in October 2022, it was quietly admitted in parliament that London maintains several “permanent military personnel in Israel,” all posted in the British Embassy in Tel Aviv:

“They carry out key activities in defense engagement and diplomacy. The Ministry of Defense supports the HMG Middle East Peace Process Programme in the Occupied Palestinian Territories and Israel. The program aims to help protect the political and physical viability of a two-state solution. We would not disclose the location and numbers of military personnel for security reasons.”

‘Joint activity’

Netanyahu and other Israeli officials have openly and repeatedly boasted of their personal role in blocking Palestinian statehood. We are thus left to ponder what these British operatives are truly concerned about – it certainly isn’t protecting “the political and physical viability of a two-state solution,” as that entire project was evidently never “viable,” by design. It could be those “permanent military personnel” who are present under the auspices of a highly confidential December 2020 military cooperation agreement inked by London and Tel Aviv.

British Ministry of Defense officials describe the agreement as an “important piece of defense diplomacy,” which “strengthens” military ties between the pair while providing “a mechanism for planning our joint activity.” 

Its contents are nonetheless concealed not only from the public but also from elected lawmakers. Speculation can only abound that the agreement compels Britain to defend Israel in the event it is attacked. Such suspicions are only compounded by the visible presence of the UK’s elite SAS forces in Gaza today.

As a December 2023 investigation by The Cradle revealed, this apparent deployment is protected from media and public scrutiny by a dedicated Ministry of Defense-issued D-notice, as are other ominous indicators Britain is shaping the theater and setting the stage in West Asia for a full-blown, protracted region-wide war. 

This included an as-yet-failed effort to pressure Beirut into allowing armed British soldiers total, unrestricted freedom of movement within Lebanon, along with immunity from arrest and prosecution for committing any crime.

The monarchy’s departure from neutrality

At countless protests the world over in solidarity with Palestinians since last October, demonstrators have brandished banners and signs imploring US President Joe Biden to impose a ceasefire in Gaza, if not order Netanyahu to seek peace. It is a noble demand, yet potentially misdirected. The true power to halt Tel Aviv’s current push to fulfill Zionism’s genocidal founding mission may not lie in Washington DC but in London – specifically, Buckingham Palace.

An extraordinary and largely unremarked upon development since Israel’s military assault on Gaza began has been the British monarchy’s shameless abandonment of “political neutrality” over Israel. 

Queen Elizabeth II, publicly at least, refrained from commenting on current affairs or appearing to take “sides” on any issue throughout her 70-year reign. However, her recently coronated son has apparently, without fanfare, comprehensively shredded that longstanding convention.

King Charles the Zionist 

Within hours of Operation Al-Aqsa Flood’s eruption, King Charles openly condemned Hamas, saying he was “profoundly distressed” and “appalled” by the “horrors inflicted” by the resistance group and its “barbaric acts of terrorism.” Hamas is not recognized as a terrorist entity by a majority of countries internationally, while the BBC – which has relentlessly manufactured consent for genocide in Gaza every step of the way – rejects the designation’s use.

In the years immediately prior to taking the throne, Charles made his Zionism abundantly clear, breaking with his mother’s unspoken policy of not visiting Israel, secretly attending the funerals of former Israeli leaders Yitzhak Rabin and Shimon Peres. In the latter instance, in 2016, he also visited the graves of his grandmother, Princess Alice, and her aunt, Grand Duchess Elisabeth, in a cemetery on Jerusalem’s Mount of Olives, near the world’s largest Jewish cemetery. Both were Christian Zionists.

The Jerusalem Post approvingly dubbed Charles’ Zionist sympathies and familial connection to the Mount “a problem for Palestinians,” arguing he has a clear view of “who the city and the country belong to.” Meanwhile, the Times of Israel has hailed him as “a friend” to Jewry “with special and historic ties to Israel.” One such “tie” was an intimate friendship with Britain’s former chief Rabbi and President of United Jewish Israel Appeal, Jonathan Sacks.

Educational indoctrination 

Among other proselytizing acts, Sacks oversaw and advocated a number of operations intended to indoctrinate schoolchildren of all ages in Zionism, often under the bogus aegis of countering “antisemitism” in classrooms and on campuses. It may well be no coincidence then that the Department for Education has softly unveiled a multimillion-pound effort to train “staff and learners” at British schools, colleges, and universities to “identify and tackle incidents of antisemitism.”

A noble endeavor, one might argue. But it is evidently in keeping with Sacks’ pet projects. Among the program’s key stated objectives is “providing education staff with the necessary tools to hold and facilitate discussions on the historic and current conflicts [in West Asia] and tackling disinformation … including on the situation in Israel following the terrorist attacks on 7 October.” It also intends for universities to “demonstrate practical commitment to the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism.”

Manufacturing and maintaining the Zionist entity 

Most British universities have accepted the highly controversial IHRA definition under direct government threat of funding cuts if they refused. The definition’s validity and legitimacy have been widely challenged, including by academic David Feldman, one of its authors. In 2017, he expressed grave concerns that “this definition is imprecise,” falsely equating Judaism and Israel with an overwhelming focus on the latter, producing “a danger that the overall effect will place the onus on Israel’s critics to demonstrate they are not antisemitic.”

The initiative is unambiguously concerned with stifling criticism of Israel and its occupation while ensuring British youth are, from the earliest, most formative age, propagandized in its support. 

His Majesty’s government clearly believes in Tel Aviv’s future endurance, and is in for the long haul, in terms of helping preserve the Mephistophelian project. There can surely be no greater proof that the current crisis in West Asia was made in London. 

Source: Kit Klarenberg – Originally published in The Cradle


  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
On 6/28/2022 at 5:54 PM, Macnamara said:

The Clash of Civilisations


In order to build their third temple in jerusalem the freemasons must first remove the al aqsa mosque from temple mount as it sits where the temple would be built. Possible ways to achieve this would be to carry out a missile strike on it that is then blamed on hezbollah or some other group or alternatively they could undermine the building and blame its collapse on earthquake tremors. Of course this would precipitate a response from muslim nations like iran that would see such a move as a direct assault on their religion. This would create a conflict in the middle east that would drag in major powers like the US and russia who are already butting heads in Ukraine:

Grand Mufti of Jerusalem Warns Israeli Excavations Could Cause the Collapse of Al-Aqsa Mosque

The Grand Mufti of Jerusalem and the Palestinian territories, Mohammad Hussein, warned on Monday that the ongoing excavations carried out by the Israeli Antiquities Authority (IAA) and Elad settlement group near and under the foundations of Al-Aqsa Mosque could lead to its collapse, the official Palestinian news agency WAFA reported.

The Mufti said the IAA and Elad, working together in the same area, were removing soil, opening holes adjacent to the southern wall of the Mosque, and clearing the paths under it, which would lead to the weakening of the foundations of Al-Aqsa Mosque and eventually its collapse.

Hamas has called for urgent action to protect Al-Aqsa Mosque from the isr*eli excavations that are endangering its foundations. pic.twitter.com/hZpKWysOxg

— Sara Rey (@SaraReyi) June 25, 2022


He added that these excavations are continuing and did not stop, but were recently increased to include multiple places at the same time, which warns of imminent danger to the holy Al-Aqsa Mosque and the buildings adjacent to it.

At the same time, the Mufti condemned Israeli plans to register ownership of property in the vicinity of the Old City of Jerusalem and Al-Aqsa Mosque in the name of Jewish settlers.

Grand Mufti of Jerusalem semitic Palestinian Mohammed Muhsen warns of collapse of Al-Aqsa Mosque due to continuous ‘israeli’ occupation “excavations” beneath its foundations.This is intentionally done to topple it from within.#AlAqsaUnderAttack #AlAqsa #FreePalestine #Palestine pic.twitter.com/sMRLkIjkaG

— Crescent Heart (@ehab_judeh) June 27, 2022


He called for an immediate end to the excavations, and to restrain the Israeli occupation from its blatant measures practiced against Al-Aqsa Mosque.



of course netenyahu is going to say that.....the sabbateans can't achieve their supremacist goals until they create the third temple on temple mount as that is what harkens the coming of the messianic age when the moshiach will come and elevate the sabbateans above all other humans and make everyone their slaves


how could this be possible? It could be made possible very easily through the creation of a SMART-grid TECHNOCRACY with programmable central bank digital currencies, social credit scores, digital ID's, biomettrics, driverless cars, universal basic income all run, monitored and controlled by a central artificial intelligence which handles all of the data sent into the 5G CLOUD from all of the smart (wireless) appliances (EVERYTHING will be made 'smart')


That is THE conspiracy....but first they are going to need to get rid of the al aqsa mosque so that they can build their temple....then comes the messiah, then comes the enslavement of the entire human race aka 'the great reset'....is everyone keeping up? are you seeing it yet?


Netanyahu's office claims Al-Aqsa Mosque compound is part of Israel
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office claimed that the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound, located in Palestine, is part of Israel.

Israel will allow worshippers to access the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound in similar numbers to past years for the first week of Ramadan.

The decision regarding the occupied East Jerusalem holy site was made at a meeting of "all security elements" led by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, his office said on Tuesday on X, formerly Twitter.

The statement also claimed that Al-Aqsa, located in Palestine, was part of Israel and suggested members of all religions have a right to worship at the third holiest site in Islam, despite this breaching the longstanding status-quo arrangement governing the compound.

"Ramadan is sacred to Muslims; its sanctity will be upheld this year, as it is every year," Netanyahu's office said.

"During the first week of Ramadan, the entry of worshippers to the Temple Mount will be permitted, similar to the numbers in previous years," the office added, using a Jewish name to refer to the Al-Aqsa compound.


Edited by Macnamara
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Britain is under the zionist boot:

What on earth has happened to the Land of Hope and Glory?

March 9, 2024

WHEN I came to Europe from the United States in 2015 to walk the Camino (the 500-mile ancient pilgrimage route through northern Spain), I had the good fortune to fall in with a group of genial Brits. I was planning to visit the UK after my pilgrimage to finish a novel and explore the world left behind by my grandfather. He was born a pauper in London in 1878 and went to America in 1903 to make his fortune and eventually send my father to Columbia University. As my new friends and I walked together, I wistfully described my vision of what life in the Land of Hope and Glory must be like, which they quickly dispelled as a delusion shared by most Americans: a strange amalgam of J R R Tolkien, A A. Milne and Winston Churchill. ‘That England no longer exists,’ they said. ‘Except maybe in the Cotswolds,’ one of them added, hopefully. When I mused about how lovely it would be one day to meet a nice English woman – a schoolteacher or church-secretary type, perhaps – and settle down, their alarm intensified. ‘My God, man! Have you read no vintage British crime fiction? They are the ones who usually commit murder most foul!’

So much for preconceived notions. I did meet many charming and kind people in a land brimming with the history of Western civilisation, but the Britain I encountered is indeed very different to the one of my idealised imagination. This first became apparent at a garden party in London when I found myself chatting with a school guidance counsellor. ‘So, how are kids doing these days?’ I asked, intending only to make polite conversation and fully expecting to hear the kind of optimism that usually accompanies stories about children. But no, this woman told me that all was far from well and that kids in general were actually quite depressed: ‘Who could blame them when the world will end before they reach our age?’ I was certain I was hearing some of that famous British dry wit. Not wanting to be caught out, I said nothing as I looked half-smirkingly at the woman and waited for her to break out into laughter. But she didn’t. She was talking about climate change, and she was deadly serious. I nervously excused myself to grab another drink before Armageddon.

I would have dismissed my experience at the garden party to the admixture of gin and melancholy, except that I began to have similar encounters everywhere. BBC Radio 4 daily sounded the same depressingly uniform tone of alarm over mankind’s bleak future. Even as American media were reporting historic levels of snowfall that were closing roads to ski resorts in the Rocky Mountains, one BBC reporter managed to find a community in Finland (or was it Iceland?) whose snowfall was (temporarily as it turned out) less than expected. With glum sobriety and absolute authority she informed listeners that this snowless wasteland was the Earth’s inevitable fate.

A ray of optimism shone through at one dinner party in Greenwich when the hostess announced that it would be another sixty years before all crops would cease to grow upon the face of the earth – at least allowing enough time, I secretly rejoiced, for the aforementioned guidance counsellor’s students to reach middle age.

But hope was short-lived. Sitting in a pew at St Luke’s Church in Charlton Village on Scout Sunday, I heard the vicar tell a squirming knot of terrified Beavers the woeful news, recently announced by the (then) Prince of Wales, that the world very well might end before their eighteenth birthdays.

If apocalypticism is the new religion of Britain, the NHS surely is its God against whom no blasphemy may be spoken. I learned this the hard way. You may recall that the parents of the terminally ill infant Charlie Gard had privately raised millions of pounds to pay for a new treatment that had been tried with success by a highly respected specialist at Columbia Hospital in New York. When I read that their child was being held hostage by the NHS and the European Court of Human Rights in Brussels, I lamented this sad fact in a post on my Facebook page. If a court in Montreal presumed to tell an American family that they couldn’t use their own money to seek treatment for their dying child at one of the premier medical research universities in the world, the Jefferson Memorial would spontaneously combust and there would be pitchforks and torches in the streets of Washington, DC.

But this is not America, and I was unprepared for the deluge of opprobrium that would fall upon me from my British friends for daring to suggest that a decision of the NHS should be questioned in any way. The gist of their comments was that the parents needed to get in line because the NHS certainly knew what was best for them. In a strange foreboding of the current lockdown culture, few Brits seemed to grasp that the issue in the Charlie Gard case was freedom – the freedom of parents to choose how long and hard to fight, at their own expense, for the life of their own child versus the power of the NHS to force them to give up on that life. The entire question for these social media scolds turned on whether the NHS could be trusted to make the right decision (yes), and whether that decision should be questioned (no), not whether the NHS had the right to make that decision instead of the parents. Sound familiar?

I began then to understand that modern Britain has become exceptionally good at queueing up, shutting up and doing as they are told. I understand that even better now.

Nigel Lawson, who served Margaret Thatcher as Chancellor of the Exchequer, said that ‘the NHS is the closest thing the English people have to a religion’. The Covid-19 pandemic combined Britain’s apocalyptic impulse with its religious fealty toward the NHS to create the perfect storm. So it is unsurprising, I suppose, that the British public’s silent, abject submission to the government would persist well beyond the point where both the benefits of the lockdown policy and the perceived danger to the NHS ceased to bear any relationship to reality.

The Church of England, which in past crises has been a rock of stability and strength for the nation, led the pack of those who have decided to run for their lives. The Church closed its doors even to its own clergy as well as to private prayer, and instructed clergy to refuse to answer the call of the NHS for volunteer chaplains to minister to the sick and dying. (Fr Marcus Walker’s essay in the Times, pleading with the bishops to reverse this policy, and his lament that the Church of England could no longer call itself the national church if they failed to do so, was particularly painful to read.)

During lockdown, I chanced upon an old movie filmed in England in the early seventies titled Swallows and Amazons. The story recreates a young family’s holiday to the Lake District in 1929. With their mother staying in the cottage on shore and giving her blessing, four siblings ranging from eight to 14 years of age pack their own supplies, sail their small boat to an island in the lake, make a campfire, sleep in tents for several nights, and live out various adventures as imaginary castaways on a pirate island. The story of children trusted with this much freedom (and the risk of harm that freedom brings) had to be real enough to seem plausible to the British audience that loved it in 1974, but it is the stuff of utter fantasy (if not criminality) today. Today, we are being governed, and our news is being curated and delivered to us, by the generations of neurotic helicopter parents and their children that followed the ones who lived in 1929.

Do you remember the massive, nationwide lockdown in the UK during the 1968-69 Hong Kong flu that took an estimated one to four million lives worldwide? Our grandparents don’t remember it either, because it never happened. Life carried on as usual, which is why if you were alive back then, you probably don’t have a memory that a disease as deadly as covid, if not ten times more deadly. The BBC wasn’t broadcasting daily death counts and doing its damnedest to frighten the bejesus out of all of us. It never occurred to our grandparents to react to that tragedy by immolating the society we would inherit from them. As a result, today we look back at 1969 and remember not cowering in fear from a virus but putting a man on the moon. The British public seem to prefer their fears or, more to the point, the feeling of safety and security that comes from looking to others to protect us from our fears, even imaginary ones. Like children, we huddle under the covers in terror of the monster that may or may not (but could, statistically speaking) live under the bed.

We are not like our grandparents, and they were nothing like us, and that has made all the difference. The Britain of today is a health-and-safety culture that has largely abandoned the religious faith that once gave it a sense of transcendent meaning. As a result it finds itself obsessed with every threat— real or imagined—to its materialist world view and sees goblins of risk and impending doom around every corner.

What on earth has happened to the Land of Hope and Glory?

A longer version of this article appeared in Country Squire Magazine on March 7, 2024, and is republished by kind permission




  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/10/2024 at 9:43 AM, Macnamara said:

What on earth has happened to the Land of Hope and Glory?


Thanks Mac. I realised some years ago that end-of-the-world type armageddon stories in religions are actually just metaphors for the end of a culture, its replacement by a new order or empire. For example the Biblical Book of Revelation can be seen as a coded description of the Roman suppression of Jewish culture and the destruction of the Temple following the uprisings in the 1st & 2nd Centuries. The mythology gets rehashed in the 20th and 21st C by evangelicals for example to refer to the decline of Christianity in the West. 


The 'global warming' >> 'climate change' >> 'climate crisis' storyline we've been fed over the past few generations looks very like another instance of a crypto-religious prophecy being used as a coded description of an actual agenda being put into action. The NWO will be fully revealed when the ptb announce that they have finally got the climate crisis under control following all the restrictions they had to put on us, as they will need to explain why the world hasn't actually ended and humans are still around.  


On the other point about the changing vision of traditional British institutions, I have the occasional hopeful moment. We went to a pantomime in January and a rock concert last month, both in large venues filled only with people of the same race as me, a rare experience nowadays. Maybe events like those will be targeted in due course but for now it makes me feel my culture is still worth trying to save. 

Edited by Campion
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Choseness part 20: the sabbateans


I'm borrowing info from a couple of posters on the forum....


First off the fact that ghislaine maxwell's sister, isabel, is a 'technology pioneer' of the world economic forum. Is it alarming that the sister of jeffrey epsteins co-conspirator in their mossad pedo blackmail operation is heavily involved in israeli big tech start-ups and the world economic forum? It certainly helps to flesh out the networks doesn't it?


'Isabel Sylvia Margaret Maxwell (born 16 August 1950) is a French-born entrepreneur and the co-founder of Magellan, an early search engine that was acquired by Excite. Maxwell has been listed as a Technology Pioneer of the World Economic Forum,[1] She served as the President of Commtouch, an Israeli internet company that became CYREN.[2] She was a Director of Israel Venture Network and built up their Social Entrepreneur program in Israel from 2004–2010.

Maxwell was the president of Commtouch, Inc., an Israeli-American e-mail messaging and security company,[2] from 1997 to 2001. The company went public on NASDAQ in 1999.[11] In 2014, the company changed its name to CYREN.[12]

From 2003 to 2004, Maxwell was invited by Blumberg capital to become CEO of iCognito,[13] renamed Puresight, an Israeli web content filtering software company. She turned the company around, and it was sold in 2005 to Boston Communications.[14][6]

Other interests

Maxwell was a member of Israel Venture Network (IVN), an organization founded in 2001 by Éric Benhamou.[15] She was the chairperson of the IVN Social Entrepreneur Fellowship Program,[6] from 2004-2010. She spoke on several occasions for and on behalf of IVN at conferences such as WEBBIT in Istanbul in Turkey'



Secondly we have a jewish activist calling for the legalisation of euthanasia in ireland. So first of all they hit people with a covid jab bioweapon, then they flood in migrants to replace them, then they offer euthanasia to the sick and dying native irish...



Edited by Macnamara
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites


weird and getting weirder....


On 3/6/2024 at 10:16 PM, Macnamara said:

Is UK royal family imploding?

March 5, 2024 9:32 pm by CWR

There is so much strangeness coming from the royal family as of late… is this the start of their collapse?

To name a few….

-You’ve got both Charles and Kate out with serious health issues- both announced on the same day, strange. Kate is also no where to be found, and the whole situation surrounding her is just odd.

-Camilla has now just suddenly left on holiday, stepping back from her duties unexpectedly, when she’s really supposed to be stepping UP with the other family members absences.

-Thomas Kingston’s sudden death/got suicided. (Serious head injury and also a gun found next to his body?)

-Prince William pulling out of engagements and displaying odd behavior (I.e. ignoring questions about Kate’s recovery, pulled out last minute of his god fathers memorial service last week that he was meant to speak at, appearing drunk/under the influence at a state event)

-William and Kate’s kids haven’t been seen in months, and are currently not attending school allegedly

-Princes Anne’s husband being photographed today with a black eye that he got from “gardening”

-Also let’s throw in there that J Rothschild just died. Not technically a member of the royal family but may as well be.

Their PR teams are failing miserably if these are all just coincidences. What is going on????



AI generated photos?

Pressure on Palace to reveal truth about Kate Middleton's Mother's Day photo: Picture is 'killed' by top agencies over claims first image of Princess since her surgery has been 'manipulated' - as fans point to 'errors' which 'prove it has been edited'

By Rebecca English and Emily Jane Davies and Miriam Kuepper

Published: 21:46 EDT, 10 March 2024 | Updated: 12:38 EDT, 11 March 2024


  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Choseness Part 21: The sabbateans, cybernetics, artificial intelligence and transhumanism


Norbert Wiener (November 26, 1894 – March 18, 1964) was an American computer scientist, mathematician and philosopher. He became a professor of mathematics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). A child prodigy, Wiener later became an early researcher in stochastic and mathematical noise processes, contributing work relevant to electronic engineering, electronic communication, and control systems.

Wiener is considered the originator[4] of cybernetics, the science of communication as it relates to living things and machines,[5]

After much consideration, we have come to the conclusion that all the existing terminology has too heavy a bias to one side or another to serve the future development of the field as well as it should; and as happens so often to scientists, we have been forced to coin at least one artificial neo-Greek expression to fill the gap. We have decided to call the entire field of control and communication theory, whether in the machine or in the animal, by the name Cybernetics, which we form from the Greek κυβερνήτης or steersman.

with implications for engineering, systems control, computer science, biology, neuroscience, philosophy, and the organization of society. His work heavily influenced computer pioneer John von Neumann, information theorist Claude Shannon, anthropologists Margaret Mead and Gregory Bateson, and others.

Norbert Wiener is credited as being one of the first to theorize that all intelligent behavior was the result of feedback mechanisms, that could possibly be simulated by machines and was an important early step towards the development of modern artificial intelligence.[6]



Wiener was born in Columbia, Missouri, the first child of Leo Wiener and Bertha Kahn, Jewish immigrants from Lithuania and Germany, respectively. Through his father, he was related to Maimonides, the famous rabbi, philosopher and physician from Al Andalus, as well as to Akiva Eger, chief rabbi of Posen from 1815 to 1837.[7]: p. 4 


  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)


New extremism definition unveiled by government

1 hour ago
By Sam Francis, political reporter & Christy Cooney,BBC News

Under the new definition, which comes into force on Thursday, extremism is "the promotion or advancement of an ideology based on violence, hatred or intolerance, that aims to:

  1. negate or destroy the fundamental rights and freedoms of others; or
  2. undermine, overturn or replace the UK's system of liberal parliamentary democracy and democratic rights; or
  3. intentionally create a permissive environment for others to achieve the results in (1) or (2)."



So would the world economic forum's 'great reset' not fall foul of numbers 1 and 2 seeing as it is seeking to remould our society into a technocracy that would rob us of our inalienable rights and replace governance with artificial intelligence? Would the world economic forum and related think tanks not fall foul of number 3?

Also would marxism and its intent to sabotage 'capitalism' and recreate society as a centrally controlled system under a politburo not also fall foul of these?

I would also like to report the parliament itself because according to the author Ben Greene in his book 'The british constitution and the corruption of parliament' the two party system has corrupted the british constitution.

So how can we ascertain the truth about all of these things if we are not allowed to discuss them?

As for myself i have no intention to negate or destroy anyones inalienable rights, in fact i see myself as trying to protect them!

As for number 2 i suppose by 'undermine' they would argue that to even question parliaments claim to be 'soveriegn' and therefore the supreme power in the land would count as 'undermining'? But what if that is itself an undermining of the british constitution? How can we establish the truth if we cannot discuss such matters? Also isn't a democracy meant to be a free market of ideas so isn't the very idea that there must be no questioning itself an undermining of peoples democratic rights?


I note that what the politicians are seeking to uphold here with this definition is obviously their own rule which they have euphemistically called 'liberal parliamentary democracy' but they are NOT seeking to uphold the british constitution which doesn't even get a mention....


What happens if there is an emergency such as a 'disease x' and parliament goes into lockstep with the world health organisation and dictates that certain things MUST happen such as mandatory 'vaccinations', people with positive PCR tests pulled out of their homes and put in 'quarantine' camps, lockdowns, incarcerations for dissenters etc? No one woud be able to then question the absolutism of parliament or invoke the british constitution or common law or natural law in order to uphold their own, and everyone elses, inalienable rights...

Edited by Macnamara
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
On 3/11/2024 at 12:51 PM, Campion said:

 On the other point about the changing vision of traditional British institutions, I have the occasional hopeful moment. We went to a pantomime in January and a rock concert last month, both in large venues filled only with people of the same race as me, a rare experience nowadays. Maybe events like those will be targeted in due course but for now it makes me feel my culture is still worth trying to save. 


well you need to be careful because although what you actually want is just for your own culture to continue, they may accuse you of having a problem with people of a different 'race'....


But it's interesting listening to the reasoning of what's called 'the left' these days because they tell us that 'whiteness' is the problem and that it places minorities under a kind of psychological stress which then requires them to have 'safe spaces' free of white people so that they can take shelter from that psychological stress.


Now if people are feeling psychological stress then that IS a horrible thing. I don't want anyone feeling that and i don't want to feel it myself. People have long talked about a phenomenon felt by some travellers called 'culture shock' when a traveller suddenly finds themself in a place that is different to what they are used to and where the people might look, sound and behave differently to what they are used to. That experience is a form of psychological stress.


So if we accept this idea pushed by the left that minorities experience a psychological stress because the majority of people around them look and behave differently to them then can't we ask if white people wouldn't then ALSO experience the same psychological stress if they were made into a minority through demoraphic shift? So doesn't demographic shift therefore simply shift the burden of psychological stress from one group of people onto another and if so how does that resolve the problem? And if once the demographic shift is accomplished, does the left intend to create white-only, 'safe spaces' for white people where they can take shelter from the psychological stress of being a minority?

Edited by Macnamara
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
On 11/17/2023 at 4:55 PM, Macnamara said:

The Greys


To bring some cohesion to this line of investigation: if we consider that occultists are accessing different realms of consciousness and are communicating with entities there we can ask ourselves if that realm is then influencing those occultists who then act as conduits for the malevolent force they encounter in that realm....


The notorious 'illuminati' which is the bloodline families that own the mega-corporations are dark occultists and what i'm suggesting is that their 'transhumanist' agenda is not of this world but rather something that they are imposing on this reality in the name of the malevolent force that they serve from another dimension. When you see it this way you can understand everything this lady speaks about in this clip about how they are attacking human gender and genome and spirit itself to try and remould humans into something else entirely which could approximate to worker-bee type drones called 'greys' that have no discernible gender or autonomy. UFOlogists would call that an 'alien' agenda whilst religious people would call it a 'demonic' agenda. I'm inclined to the religious view.

Laura Aboli “Transhumanism: The End Game”



I've just watched an interview on the UK Column website with Matt Ehret about what he terms the 'UFO psyop' and of course Matt, as always blames 'the British' for this!

The British Origins of the UFO Psyop with Matt Ehret



Matt conveniently glosses over, shifting awkwardly as he does so, with a very brief mention of the jewish father of cybernetics norbert weiner and then gets back to his more preferred ground of discussing the likes of HG Wells which he clearly feels more bouyant about. Apparently a novel writer who wrote about aliens is much more important for us to focus our attention on then the guy who created cybernetics and paved the way to artificial intelligence....


Ehret then manages to talk a fair bit about the mystery schools whilst completely ignoring freemasonry! Wow....how did you manage to avoid that huge elephant in the room matt? You do realise that in britain freemasonry is THE game in town. Don't you want people asking questions about the origins of a mystery school obsessed with solomon and the  jewish temple? He also mentions the templars but tries to pin them on various movements of monks with no mention of that orders obsession with solomon and the jewish temple...


Matt seems to be keen to deny that there is any truth to any inter-dimensional entities whilst implying to consider such is some sort of attack on christianity however does christianity not also deal with these subjects using its own language of 'angels' and 'demons' instead of 'extra-terrestrials'? But instead Matt wants us to believe that all such talk of other realms is some sort of 'psyop' so that presumably we simply sweep it all under the carpet. Isn't christianity also concerned with 'fallen angels' though Matt?


And how matthew can you somehow speak of ancient mystery schools using entheogens to access other realms of consciousness where entities are encountered whilst then trying to pin the whole thing on 19C british occultists? Don't you see that they are just a continuation of those ancient mysteries? Which then leaves us to ask why all of this stuff came into britain with all of its talk of solomon and the jewish temple? Clearly it isn't a homegrown british creation. Perhaps we have to turn instead to the rothschilds and their occult network to answer those questions....are you ever going to turn over that rock Matt or just keep trying to twist all this to blame the anglo saxons?



by Fritz Springmeier
April 30, 2011

Is there any proof that events in the world are following a script?


The question has intrigued me because many people with inside knowledge have told me of attending meetings where the script of the future was outlined, 200-yr. plans, 40-year plans, 20, 10, and 5-year plans.

The futuristic predictions of Herbert George "H.G." Wells (a socialist Masonic Prophet) prove that indeed much more is contrived than the man in the street could imagine.

Written in 1913, Well's The World Set Free predicted the use of atom bombs and the effect of nuclear war long before scientists considered the possibility.


It also predicted the breakthrough in 1933, when the details of nuclear chain reaction were discovered.

In other books, Wells said a NWO would come about by the elite controlling the air and sea lanes, as well as energy production, which indeed they have done.


Another incredible visionary idea was the concept of air superiority. Whoever gains control of the air will consistently win the ground battle. This has been shown since W.W. I, but it was not realized when H.G. Wells conceived it, and it has taken many years for people to accept the idea.

Not only did H.G. Wells predict,

  • modern warfare

  • the bombing of London

  • atom bombs

  • the League of Nations

  • stealth fighters over Iraq

  • space flight,

...and countless other details of the future, far in advance of their eventual happening, as well as mapping out in detail how a New World Order could be created, but he participated in causing events to take place.

He was a major player to create the League of Nations.


When the Russian Revolution occurred, H.G. Wells (who was known simply as H.G.) went to Russia to trade ideas with Lenin on how to follow up the Revolution to create a New World Order. They disagreed, and parted disliking each other. (The disagreement stemmed over H.G.'s vision that the elite families through business and technology would create the New Order. Lenin wanted to socialize things directly through strong government.)

Much later in 1934, H.G. visited personally with FDR in the U.S. and Stalin in Moscow. (By the way, all three were Freemasons.)


After visiting with FDR, H.G. declared that the,

"United States...[was] the most effective transmitting instrument possible for the coming of the new world order."

He felt that FDR was incorporating H.G.'s Open Conspiracy ideas for bringing in the NWO that H.G. had been advocating, for instance, FDR's brain trust, technocratic string pullers like Felix Frankfurter and Raymond Moley, who made policy for FDR.

After his meeting with Stalin, he described Stalin,

"I have never met a man more candid, fair and honest... and to nothing occult and sinister... everyone trusts him."

Over the years, he advocated the U.K. help the U.S.S.R.

Readers may realize from this that,

  • the U.S.

  • the U.S.S.R.

  • the U.K.,

...have all been guided toward the same goal, but have been taking different paths.


In general, H.G. was a guru to his generation, and after his death a society in his name continued promoting his views.

While he networked with countless persons around the world directly promoting his views (which obviously lined up with "The Plan"), his books quietly served a more subtle but important role.

The reader may have observed the following about human nature... when first confronted with something true but strange, the mind rejects it as ridiculously crazy. The second time it is heard it is merely rejected, and often the third time the truth confronts them the person will say "I knew that" as if the item were self-evident.

Now look at the titles of his books "Anticipation" and "Things to Come" and the way they were written, and it is evident that he is psychologically conditioning the public to accept the stages of the New World Order as if they were self-evident.

He was a master at this. And indeed, when I hear the elite today I hear echoes of H.G. Well's ideas.


For instance, David Rockefeller at the 1991 Bilderberger meeting,

"...the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government which will never again know war but only peace and prosperity for the whole of humanity."

Contrary to the assumptions of many readers of Aldous Huxley, Orson Wells and H.G. Wells, these authors were not opposed to their prophetic views of Big Brother's One World Dictatorship.


H.G. strongly believed in racial eugenics to kill the inferior races and useless eaters. He believed the state should educate people and control their minds to obediently serve the state.


He believed in social engineering. He was opposed to Christians being allowed to teach their children about God, and religious toleration.

If you were an Illuminati insider, like the late Masonic prophet Manly P. Hall, who served as a Grand Master in both the Illuminati and Freemasonry, you would understand the esoteric reference that H.G. made in A Modern Utopia, p. 67, that the Air Dictatorship's NWO would be "Bacon's visionary House of Salomon".

This statement alone links H.G.'s thinking with the Illuminati's occult plans. It shows H.G. was an insider with knowledge of the plans. Of course, along with inside knowledge, H.G. contained an intense intellectual curiosity, a keen comprehensive brain, great willpower, and a disdain for the common man and the christian God.


He revealed in The Invisible King (1917) that his deity was "a personification of... the five year plan".


Was Wells merely predicting or was he helping to shape and create a NWO?


There is no doubt that he was a major player to create it. His ideas have been used as a guide, although it could be postulated that his ideas are copied from a master plan that remains hidden from view.


The powers that be have intentionally manipulated the crime rate in line with Wells' prediction that a police state would grow in response to the growing crime threat. The war on terror is a development in line with this.


Obviously H.G.'s writings were a blueprint to create, and not mere idle reflections of an intelligent curious man.

Born in 1866, Wells wrote a series of books that spell out how the coming New World Order would come about. In 1895, he came out with The Time Machine (sci-fi) and he continued writing and publishing until 1945, with for instance, The Happy Turning: A Dream of Life, which makes references to the futuristic dreams he had including walking with Jesus, who in H.G.'s repeating dreams was also disappointed in humanity for its stupidity and indifference.

One of the concepts of Wells' "Open Conspiracy" was that many people worldwide would openly contribute to the creation of the NWO.


This parallels another occult prophet Alice Bailey and her ideas in Externalization of the Hierarchy, where she predicts that things done in secret in the occult world would be mainstreamed to bring in the New World Order.

For those familiar with how the Illuminati have set up groups like the CFR and the Trilateral Commission will take note that H.G. was RIIA (Royal Institute for International Affairs) which was the British equivalent to the CFR.


The RIIA's first president was Waldorf Astor.


As I pointed out in Be Wise As Serpents (1991) these organizations also add on a few individual members who are not Illuminati for window dressing, so membership doesn't equate with a membership in the ultimate secret society, but it certainly indicates a person in the middle of what they are doing.

Edith Star Miller in Occult Theocracy (posthumously in 1933) does a good job of linking the plethora of organizations that the occult hierarchy breed to carry out their program, and the Fabian Society was one of them. H.G. was an active member of the Fabian Society, but his views were controversial with most of its members, but this does again show his active participation in The Plan.

The Webbs, leaders of the Fabian Society, also under Lord Robert Cecil's (Br. Intelligence) direction, organized the Cliveden Set and a group called the Coefficients. The Coefficients later became the Round Table.


H.G. was part of the Coefficients, which included such personages as,

  • Sir Edward Grey

  • Bertrand Russell

  • Cecil's cousin Lord Arthur Balfour

(By the way, names which appear in my Bloodlines of the Illuminati - 1995 - book.)


Now bear in mind, H.G. was born to a servant, granted - a head servant, of the British elite, and here he is rubbing shoulders with the Illuminati aristocratic elite.


Also bear in mind that H.G. despised the lower classes and promoted the idea that the elite's big businesses would lead us into the New World Order along with technology and technocrats that run that technology.

H.G.'s ideas on the power of technology and technocrats to create a NWO spawned an entire movement in that direction. It is beyond the scope of this short article to go into that, but the use of technology, especially in the ways H.G. outlined has indeed been achieved.

I knew in 1991, when I was the first to identify H.G. as a Freemason that it could lead to controversy, because the Mason's Lodges had not publicly recognized him being a member.

There are a certain set of members whose membership they perpetually keep quiet about. I based my assertion that he was a Freemason on my back issues of the Scottish Rite's New Age magazine that I had been fortunate to buy going back to almost WW I.

These magazines treated him like they did members, as well as referring to him as a "masonic prophet". On the other side of things, H.G. in his books/movies makes references to Freemasonry and uses Masonic imagery/symbols.

Particularly of note, is his reference in his short "The Story of The Inexperienced Ghost" to the Masonic Lodge of Research, the Quatuor Coronati Lodge 2076.


His character says,

"Now, Sanderson is a Freemason, a member of the Lodge of the Four Kings, which devotes itself so ably to the study and elucidation of all the mysteries of Masonry past and present."

(The Complete Short Stories of H.G. Wells, pp. 909-910)

That H.G. carried so much clout with Freemasons around the globe also speaks something.

The occult symbol of the Winged Globe, a symbol often used by Freemason Charles Taze Russell (founder of the J.W.'s Watchtower Society), was to become the symbol of the NWO in the book/movie The Shape of Things to Come.


Read my books Be Wise As Serpents (1991) and The Watchtower & the Masons (1990) to explore all the numerous links between all of these things. Also noteworthy is H.G.'s close association with the Huxley's who were Freemasons. Freemason T.H. Huxley (a Fellow of the Royal Society at 26!) mentored Wells, and stressed the idea of a Scientific Dictatorship which H.G. was able to promote to the extent it became a popular movement.

H.G. Wells had a belief in himself and a vibrancy that made his ideas and himself attractive.


He was skilled with the pen, but a poor speaker. He had affairs with a constant stream of interested woman, who he emotionally scarred in short order. He placed importance on friends, such as the international author Joseph Conrad, but the women he conquered were simply sexual objects to him. In this the reader sees he had inconsistencies, in this example, that his rhetoric about women's rights was a cause but not a personal life style.


He got his big break in life when William Ernest Henley believed in his abilities and in 1895 helped his launch his sci-fi writing career. Two books that had a big influence on Wells as a boy writer were Plato's Republic and Jonathan Swift's satire Gulliver's Travels.

Wells shows us that decision-makers are indeed guided by detailed futuristic plans.


H.G. Wells was at the center of what the Illuminati were doing to create the stages of development towards a One World Government. That he believed in what he was doing, there is no question.


His possible occult activities, if they took place, have been well hidden. He was a practical intellectual whose writings have changed our world.


Edited by Macnamara
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
34 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

The British Origins of the UFO Psyop with Matt Ehret

Matt conveniently glosses over, shifting awkwardly as he does so, with a very brief mention of the jewish father of cybernetics norbert weiner and then gets back to his more preferred ground of discussing the likes of HG Wells which he clearly feels more bouyant about. Apparently a novel writer who wrote about aliens is much more important for us to focus our attention on then the guy who created cybernetics and paved the way to artificial intelligence....


One thing Matt does talk about is the idea amongst the pioneers of cybernetics and artificial intelligence is that everything is made of feedback loops and that the entire universe is a closed system. Could it not be the case that such a way of thinking and seeing is itself an outgrowth of kabbalah with its two polarised pillars and with its four worlds of emanation and ten sephiroth?


Are we in fact just witnessing old occultism re-couched into modern scientific language?


Merkabah torus:




I Extreme Kabbalah: The Genesis Torus



Edited by Macnamara
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
49 minutes ago, Macnamara said:


I've just watched an interview on the UK Column website with Matt Ehret about what he terms the 'UFO psyop' and of course Matt, as always blames 'the British' for this!

The British Origins of the UFO Psyop with Matt Ehret


so british freemasonic fiction of the 1900's pre-dates jewish merkaba mysticism does it Matt?

Merkabah mysticism

220px-Ezekiel%27s_vision.jpg Copy of Matthäus Merian's engraving of Ezekiel's vision (1670)

Merkabah (Hebrew: מֶרְכָּבָה, romanizedmerkāḇā, lit.'chariot')[1] or Merkavah mysticism[2] (lit. Chariot mysticism) is a school of early Jewish mysticism, c. 100 BCE – 1000 CE, centered on visions such as those found in Ezekiel 1 or in the hekhalot literature ("palaces" literature), concerning stories of ascents to the heavenly palaces and the Throne of God.

The main corpus of the Merkabah literature was composed in the period 200–700 CE, although later references to the Chariot tradition can also be found in the literature of the Ashkenazi Hasidim in the Middle Ages.[3] A major text in this tradition is the Maaseh Merkabah (Hebrew: מַעֲשֵׂה מֶרְכָּבָה, romanizedmaʿśē merkāḇā, lit.'Work of the Chariot').[4]


Ezekiel's vision of the chariot

250px-Ezekiel%27s_Wheel_John_Kratovo.jpg Ezekiel's Wheel in St. John the Baptist Church in Kratovo, North Macedonia. Fresco from the 19th century.

According to the verses in Ezekiel and its attendant commentaries, his vision consists of a chariot made of many heavenly beings driven by the "Likeness of a Man". The base structure of the chariot is composed of four beings. These beings are called the "living creatures" (Hebrew: חיות hayyot or khayyot). The bodies of the creatures are "like that of a human being", but each of them has four faces, corresponding to the four directions the chariot can go (East, South, North and West). The faces are that of a man, a lion, an ox (later changed to a cherub in Ezekiel 10:14) and an eagle. Since there are four angels and each has four faces, there are a total of sixteen faces. Each of the hayyot angels also has four wings. Two of these wings spread across the length of the chariot and connect with the wings of the angel on the other side. This creates a sort of 'box' of wings that forms the perimeter of the chariot. With the remaining two wings, each angel covers its own body. Below, but not attached to, the feet of the hayyot angels are other angels that are shaped like wheels. These wheel angels, which are described as "a wheel inside of a wheel", are called "ophanim" אופנים (lit. wheels, cycles or ways). These wheels are not directly under the chariot but are nearby and along its perimeter. The angel with the face of the man is always on the east side and looks up at the "Likeness of a Man" that drives the chariot. The "Likeness of a Man" sits on a throne made of sapphire.

The Bible later makes mention of a third type of angel found in the merkabah called "seraphim" (lit. "burning") angels. These angels appear like flashes of fire continuously ascending and descending. These seraphim angels power the movement of the chariot. In the hierarchy of these angels, hayyoth are the highest, that is, closest to God, followed by the ophanim, which are followed by the seraphim.[8] The chariot is in a constant state of motion, and the energy behind this movement runs according to this hierarchy. The movement of the ophanim is controlled by the "Living creatures", or Hayyot, while the movement of the hayyot is controlled by the seraphim. The movement of all the angels of the chariot is controlled by the "Likeness of a Man" on the Throne.

Early Jewish merkabah mysticism

Mark Verman has distinguished four periods in early Jewish mysticism, developing from Isaiah's and Ezekiel's visions of the Throne/Chariot, to later extant merkabah mysticism texts:[9]

  1. 800–500 BCE, mystical elements in Prophetic Judaism such as Ezekiel's chariot
  2. Beginning c. 530s BCE, especially 300–100 BCE, Apocalyptic literature mysticism
  3. Beginning c. 100 BCE, especially 1–130s CE, early Rabbinic merkabah mysticism referred to briefly in exoteric Rabbinic literature such as the Pardes ascent; also related to early Christian mysticism
  4. c. 1–200 CE, continuing till c. 1000 CE, merkabah mystical ascent accounts in the esoteric merkabah-Hekhalot literature


Edited by Macnamara
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

'Abdominal Issues'


In Margaret Murray's book 'the witchcult in western europe' she describes accounts from witches of rituals involving gatherings of witches where 'the devil' would join the ceremony and impregnate a witch with what Margaret suggests was an 'artificial phallus' said to have been cold and to have caused great pain to the witches.


I suggest that the person playing the role of 'the devil' was a landed aristocrat of the knights templar network. I suggest that these 'witch' cults were really just a sub-branch of the templars who were active in Britain since the 1100's when the order was founded. However i suggest that the order itself was merely an outgrowth of a wider occult network that spanned europe and across the meditteranean sea to egypt. At the core of the network was kabbalistic magic.


In 1066 william the conqueror whose mother was a tanner (many people in the tanning trade were jewish) was funded by the jews of rouen to invade and conquer britain. Once he was ensconsed on the throne he put jewish administrators in charge of britain who created a taxation system called the exchequer and they audited the private possessions of the now subjugated anglo saxons and celts who inhabited britain. That audit was called the 'domesday book' by the christian anglos.


In more modern times we can see the creation of a witch cult called 'wicca' which was given much of its literature from a partnership between aleister crowley and gerald gardener. Aleister crowley claimed inspiration from 'secret chiefs'. In the book 'the magical lodge' it says that at one time the chiefs were understood to be humans but later it was claimed they were discarnate intelligences. Certainly by the time the new age movement was created out of freemasonry the secret chiefs are spoken of as discarnate entities. But i suggest that the secret chiefs are none other than the rothschild cabal, sabbatean elites.


Without sidetracking into crowleys prediliction for taboo breaking, like the sabbateans i'll just add that he was made the head of the order of oriental templars and then went on as i say to help found wicca as a female mystery school to accompany his male mystery school: the OTO (letters are themselves a symbolic representation of the male generative organs and crowley liked to incorporate a phallus in his signature). Crowley's religion was centred around sex magick and the templars used as their symbol a 'rosy cross' which could be seen to represent a bloody phallus (the cross is associated with the phallic 'tau' symbol).


The wiccan offshoot centres around their great rite involving the symbolic stabbing of a chalice with a blade symbolising the joining of the male and female reproductive organs.


On page 450 of David's book 'The Biggest Secret' he says that Princess Diana was involved in a ritual called 'the opening of the womb' involving her impregnation with a metal phallus with spikes on it which caused internal injury that drew blood. He suggests her bulemia problems may have been related to this: https://archive.org/details/david-icke-the-biggest-secret_202011/page/450/mode/2up


Many conspiracy theorists are aware of the child actress heather o'rourke who died of abdominal issues which some believe suggests harm through rape:

''On February 1, 1988, O'Rourke died following two cardiac arrests, her cause of death later being ruled as congenital stenosis of the intestine complicated by septic shock. '' https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heather_O'Rourke




  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/14/2024 at 12:17 PM, Macnamara said:

well you need to be careful because although what you actually want is just for your own culture to continue, they may accuse you of having a problem with people of a different 'race'....


Yes they may well do, in which case I would ask them to also apply their logic to outwardly race-identified organisations like the so-called 'black churches'.  Why would they not be campaigning against such a rejection of 'diversity' as well as criticising me? 


On 3/14/2024 at 12:17 PM, Macnamara said:

So if we accept this idea pushed by the left that minorities experience a psychological stress because the majority of people around them look and behave differently to them then can't we ask if white people wouldn't then ALSO experience the same psychological stress if they were made into a minority through demoraphic shift? So doesn't demographic shift therefore simply shift the burden of psychological stress from one group of people onto another and if so how does that resolve the problem? And if once the demographic shift is accomplished, does the left intend to create white-only, 'safe spaces' for white people where they can take shelter from the psychological stress of being a minority?


Indeed, and this principle has been well-known for centuries with the arrangement of minority groups into 'quarters' within cities. Immigrant peoples and other minorities have often gathered into enclaves together with others of their culture because they find it reduces the sense of culture shock and makes their lives easier. It's a universal effect and not just a race-based issue. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Macnamara said:

Without sidetracking into crowleys prediliction for taboo breaking, like the sabbateans i'll just add that he was made the head of the order of oriental templars and then went on as i say to help found wicca as a female mystery school to accompany his male mystery school: the OTO (letters are themselves a symbolic representation of the male generative organs and crowley liked to incorporate a phallus in his signature). Crowley's religion was centred around sex magick and the templars used as their symbol a 'rosy cross' which could be seen to represent a bloody phallus (the cross is associated with the phallic 'tau' symbol).


The wiccan offshoot centres around their great rite involving the symbolic stabbing of a chalice with a blade symbolising the joining of the male and female reproductive organs.


Thanks for the info Mac, the links are fascinating. I recall that as well as the OTO, Crowley was involved in the A.:A.: and the Order of the Golden Dawn which draw many of their teachings from Kabbalah which is founded the male/female duality of creation. Also Crowley's religion of Thelema has a symbol which looks distinctly Freemasonic.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

WHO staff rape children and UN “peacekeepers” kill and injure civilians, yet they demand more control over our lives

Not only is the World Health Organisation’s Director-General a terrorist, but WHO has rapists and terrorists on its staff.

WHO is an agency of the United Nations (“UN”).  There are sex scandals involving the UN as well.  There have been UN sex trafficking scandals reported in Bosnia and Kosovo, as well as a notoriously ignominious child sex ring organised in Haiti.

The UN’s violence against civilians doesn’t end with rape and sex crimes. UN “peacekeepers” have indiscriminately killed and injured civilians in Somalia and the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

It’s not just atrocities committed by individual UN employees against those unfortunate enough to live in areas where the UN takes control we must beware of – every citizen’s freedoms are endangered by the UN’s policies.

The UN is a recipe for global despotism.

WHO ‘Healthcare Workers’ Rape Children; UN ‘Peacekeepers’ Shell Civilians; UN Demanding More Control of People’s Lives, But Can’t Be Trusted Around Children or Adults

By Frontline News

Healthcare Rapists

As shocking as the revelations about mass rapes of women and children by UN “peacekeepers” and “teachers” may be, even more distressing is that UN employees supposedly dedicated to healthcare have carried out those very same atrocities and are led by an actual terrorist.

As Frontline News previously reported, the World Health Organisation (“WHO”), a UN agency, is headed by a terrorist who keeps rapists and paedophiles on staff giving them the power to abuse the poorest people in the world.  He even flies these staff members to towns in the developing world, with fancy rental cars and hotel rooms waiting for them, and with far more cash than the local residents have – a perfect recipe for exploitation.

Actual Terrorist at The Helm

Even hardcore anti-globalists might be tempted to write off such charges as ludicrous, yet it is hard to ignore the evidence Frontline News has detailed about WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus’s past:

Tedros [was] a leader of Ethiopia’s brutal minority party, the Tigray People’s Liberation Front, a wing of the ruling Marxist-rooted Ethiopian People’s Revolutionary Democratic Front …The United States State Department has categorised TPLF as a terrorist organisation due to its “violent activities …”

During his tenure as Ethiopia’s health minister and then foreign minister, Tedros risked the health of citizens for political gain:

[H]ealth experts in Ethiopia noticed a strange phenomenon: The government was refusing to acknowledge cholera outbreaks. Instead, the authorities labelled the outbreaks as “acute watery diarrhoea” … the Ethiopian government was pressuring its health workers to avoid any mention of cholera, which could damage the country’s image and deter tourists.

That’s from Tedros’ pre-WHO days. What of Tedros today?

Actual Rapists on The Healthcare Staff

Australian Senator Malcolm Roberts argued on the floor of Parliament that the WHO, far from having well-meaning leaders unaware of the child rapes carried out by their subordinates, “is rotting from the head,” Frontline News reported. Here’s his textual introduction to the video of his speech, posted on his YouTube Channel:

Former terrorist Tedros Ghebreyesus will not fire 83 WHO staff engaged in abuse including rape and forced abortions, with one victim 13, claiming rape and forced abortion do not violate WHO’s policies because the victims were not receiving WHO aid. [Emphasis added.]

Roberts’ accusation was based on an AP report on Congolese victims of rape and paedophilia at the hands of WHO staff, as he detailed:

Last week, the Associated Press reported on the WHO sex crimes scandal, where WHO staffers sexually exploited girls and women during the Congo’s recent Ebola outbreak—inhuman. At least 83 WHO staff engaged in abuse, including rape and forced abortions, with victims as young as 13. WHO refused to fire the perpetrators, using the absurd argument that their actions didn’t violate WHO’s sexual exploitation practice policies because the victims were not receiving WHO aid; the raping part is okay with Tedros. [Emphases added.]

Enabling abuse

Liberty Nation national correspondent John Klar reports on even more UN rape scandals, noting that the UN predators were put in positions of power over a population in a nation that was not their home country, arguably increasing the chance of abuse:

Additional UN sex trafficking scandals have been reported in Bosnia and Kosovo, as well as a notoriously ignominious child sex ring organised in Haiti by more than 100 UN personnel who had been insufficiently screened. In all of these experiences, insufficiently researched UN (or its numerous bureaucratic subsidiaries) staff become predators against those they were entrusted to aid, then returned home with impunity. [Emphases added.]

Killed by UN “Peacekeepers” in the 21st Century

Violent crime committed by UN employees is not limited to rape. Despite being called “peacekeepers,” UN troops are armed like any other military. The New American covered some of the attacks committed by armed UN soldiers, publicising the findings of Ali Osman, a journalist with the Somalia-based news outlet Mareeg:

The United Nations forces in Mogadishu are indiscriminately shelling civilian populated areas and markets. In the last three months alone the United Nations forces in Mogadishu have killed more than 160 civilians and have injured more than 400. [Emphases added.]

Killed by UN “Peacekeepers” in the 20th Century

Katanga, today a province in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, offers another example of UN brutality, where the world body acted as the proxy army of the Soviet Union in bombing the province’s capital Elisabethville (today Lubumbashi) and overthrowing its pro-West leader, Moïse Tshombe.

If you want to see what real hate and evil look like, check out UN "#peacekeeping" mission in Katanga in which UN "peace" troops slaughtered civilians, bombed hospitals and engaged in mass rape because the people there did not want to live under Soviet-backed dictatorship.

— Alex Newman (@ALEXNEWMAN_JOU) June 18, 2023

The full story of the UN’s bombing of innocent civilians in the Congo carried out to oust the popular anti-communist leader of the province of Katanga is recorded in the documentary below with actual video footage of the UN atrocities, particularly at 37:30:


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Europe Is Alarmed Enough To Begin Wargaming A Food Crisis

by Tyler Durden
Thursday, Mar 07, 2024 - 07:45 AM

Governments of the European Union are engaged in wargames which simulate and foresee a global food crisis. A mix of major factors including the Russia-Ukraine war and impact on grain supplies there, as well as weather events like El Niño and La Niña and their impact on Latin American soy output, and the anti-EU farmers' protests which have disrupted supermarket supply chains, have been cause for alarm, European officials say. Of course there's also the example of how drastically a pandemic can interfere with supply chains. Panic buying was a trend and constant fear within the early months of the coronavirus crisis.

Bloomberg details of a conference held in Brussels last month that envisioned a 2024 to 2025 food shortage in Europe: "...over two days in central Brussels last month, some 60 European Union and government officials, food security experts, industry representatives and a few journalists gathered to confront the possibility of something barely on the radar a few years ago: a full-blown food crisis."


  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/19/2021 at 8:44 PM, Macnamara said:


Englandspiel Part 5


Lets pause to consider the significance of snippets i have quoted above. I want to highlight these parts of the larger quoted text from part 4 which I took of the courtauld institute website.


What we see there are academics coming from the Warburg library when the nazis came to power. Could it be fair to assume that they were jewish? Certainly their patrons the Warburgs were and they could be said to be firmly part of the rothschild cabal. Paul Warburg helped found the federal reserve central bank in the US and was also on the board of the american side of IG Farben which was one of the main cartels that built the nazi warmachine. After the war this broke up and Bayer was one of the offshoots. Bayer recently bought up Monsanto in which bill gates has heavily invested. Max Warburg was on the board of the german IG Farben. That clique of bankers based in wall street and the city of London were the funders of Trotsky and Lenin and the marxist takeover of Russia.


So we have Warburg affiliates coming into the British academic scene prior to the war and then the marxist Anthony Blunt is appointed as the director of the institute who then appoints a marxist revolutionary Johannes Wilde who had attempted a marxist coup d'etat in hungary to be a lecturer on the Renaissance!


Anthony Blunt was himself one of the 'cambridge 5' who were found to be passing on british secrets to the soviets during the cold war. They were part of overlapping groups within the oxbridge elites for example the gay 'velvet mafia' and the marxists. The fifth member of the cambridge 5 is never mentioned and imo it was Victor Rothschild who was in British intelligence within MI5.


Anthony Blunt was the third cousin of the Queen mother which is her second mention in this story. She came from an aristocratic family in scotland which I suggest was part of the knights templar network.


During the second world war Blunt was recruited into MI5 and was involved with 'Ultra' which was the handling of cracked german coded messages for example the famous enigma code. Blunt started passing those decoded german messages to the soviet. Other members of the cambridge five including victor rothschild and John cairncross were also involved in various aspects of this work for example Cairncross worked for MI6 at Bletchley park where the codebreakers worked.


When blunt was outed as a soviet spy his friend Tess Rothschild, wife of victor, stuck by him. Tess was also involved in British intelligence and worked in MI5 under victor, so to speak.


So we have here a very tangled web of marxists and sabbatean jews intermarried with aristocracy who are all woven through the fabric of the upper echelons of british society from the academic centres of oxford and cambridge to the intelligence services where they were entrusted with the nations greatest secrets.


This then is the context within which to view the actions of SOE

The Fifth Man by Roland Perry (1994) RP on Victor Rothschild (1910-90) 'Creator of Israel' in 1948


Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

Europe Is Alarmed Enough To Begin Wargaming A Food Crisis

by Tyler Durden
Thursday, Mar 07, 2024 - 07:45 AM

Governments of the European Union are engaged in wargames which simulate and foresee a global food crisis. A mix of major factors including the Russia-Ukraine war and impact on grain supplies there, as well as weather events like El Niño and La Niña and their impact on Latin American soy output, and the anti-EU farmers' protests which have disrupted supermarket supply chains, have been cause for alarm, European officials say. Of course there's also the example of how drastically a pandemic can interfere with supply chains. Panic buying was a trend and constant fear within the early months of the coronavirus crisis.

Bloomberg details of a conference held in Brussels last month that envisioned a 2024 to 2025 food shortage in Europe: "...over two days in central Brussels last month, some 60 European Union and government officials, food security experts, industry representatives and a few journalists gathered to confront the possibility of something barely on the radar a few years ago: a full-blown food crisis."



Brussels, in Belgium. Next door to The Netherlands where the EU is busily putting farmers out of business for breaching its rules on nitrogen emissions, as part of its climate agenda. And now they're worried about a food crisis and supply chains ??  If this is a conspiracy it's either not a very well organised one, or they don't see the need to hide it any more.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Campion said:

 If this is a conspiracy it's either not a very well organised one, or they don't see the need to hide it any more.  


i think they are rubbing our faces in it. They are so assured that they have the entire game sown up that they can flaunt what they are doing. They have such a dim view of the masses that they believe they can mock them openly and get away with it.



  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Murdoch, Rothschild and the nuclear lobby 1
Matthew Zarb-Cousin

In his 1956 book The Power Elite, C. Wright Mills illustrated the
way in which the elite work together, are interconnected –
both socially and in business – and therefore take each other
into account when they make decisions.....
Rupert Murdoch and the financial sector
L ord Jacob Rothschild was appointed to the board of British
Sky Broadcasting in 2003 as Senior Independent Non-
Executive Director and Deputy Chairman of Murdoch’s
organisation. (Shah 2003) Having graduated from Oxford
University, Rothschild joined the family bank N. M. Rothschild &
Sons before leaving in 1980 to pursue his own interests in the
financial sector. (Shah 2003) Rothschild co-founded Global
Asset Management and J Rothschild Assurance, now part of
the St James’s Palace Group. A less direct connection is
through Murdoch’s daughter, Elisabeth, who married the
grandson of Sigmund Freud, Matthew in 2001. (BBC 2001)
Matthew Freud is the multimillionaire owner of PR company
Freud Communications (Harris 2008) and, aside from being
Rupert Murdoch’s son-in-law, British Sky Broadcasting is one of
Freud’s clients. (Sanghera 2001)
In 1997 Freud Communications is listed as a Labour
Party sponsor, donating a sum in excess of £5,000. (Aisbitt
1998) Freud had previously sold Freud Communications in
1994, when it was known as Matthew Freud Associates, and
1 This an extract from the author’s undergraduate thesis at the
University of Birmingham, The Labour Party’s movement to the Centre: an
explanation using the Wright Mills approach.
Page 76
Summer 2011
Lobster 61he continued to run the company until 2001, when he bought
it back with money borrowed from the directors of the
company, Barclays Bank and Neil Blackley – a Merrill Lynch
media analyst – illustrating Freud’s connection to the financial
sector. (Sanghera 2001) Freud’s clients included Pepsi, KFC,
Asda and Nike. (Harris 2008)
Peter Mandelson, Minister without Portfolio from 1997
until 1998, when he became Trade and Industry Secretary,
acquired responsibility for the Millennium Dome. Despite
opposition from most of the Cabinet, Blair decided that the
project would go ahead. (Carrell 2000) The Millennium Dome
was granted £400m of lottery money, and British Sky
Broadcasting were among an array of corporate sponsors.
(Carrell 2000) Prior to Mandelson’s appointment as Secretary
of State for the DTI, Freud allegedly set about galvanising
support for him in the press, placing the story ‘Peter’s Friends’
in The Sun (owned by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation)
which stated that Mandelson was a friend of various
celebrities, including Tom Cruise, whom he had never met.
(Guardian 2000) Mandelson subsequently appointed Freud to
work on one of the Millennium Dome’s senior committees,
(Harris 2008) and he had a significant impact on the arena’s
content. (Guardian 2000)
Freud organised the party that celebrated Labour’s
general election victory in 2001, and played a role in recruiting
one of his clients, Spice Girl Geri Halliwell, to Labour’s party
political broadcast in 2001, and persuading Chris Evans to
campaign with Tony Blair in 2005. (Harris 2008) According to
Harris, ‘It is Freud’s talent for hosting high-powered get-
togethers that underpins the bond with Blair.’
In 2005, Blair’s former special advisor Kate Garvey
became Freud Communications’ head of public and social
affairs, (Harris 2008) and Blair’s former health secretary Alan
Milburn is paid £25,000 a year to sit on sit on the nutritional
advisory board (sic) of one of Freud’s clients, Pepsi. (Harris
Page 77
Summer 2011
Lobster 61Shortly after Elisabeth Murdoch’s 40th birthday party in
2008, Rothschild hosted a dinner at his family’s villa in Corfu,
where Peter Mandelson was also a guest. (Harris 2008)
Jacob Rothschild and the nuclear power lobby
R othschild’s interests extend beyond the financial sector. In
2005, the newspaper Sunday Business reported, ‘N. M.
Rothschild, the London merchant bank, is leading an initiative
to finance, build and manage Britain’s next generation of
nuclear power stations.’ (Orange 2005)
Rothschild’s involvement in nuclear power was centred
on his ambition to ‘dominate the next phase of nuclear power
development’. (Orange 2005) British Nuclear Fuels plc is an
international company owned by the government, involved in
all stages of the nuclear process: designing reactors,
manufacturing fuel, decommissioning reactors and dealing with
radioactive waste. (British Nuclear Fuels 2006) In 2005,
Rothschild assembled a plan for British Nuclear Fuels plc
suggesting the means for funding nuclear power through the
private sector. (Orange 2005) In April 2006, Rothschild was
appointed by British Nuclear Fuels plc to handle the £1bn sale
of the organisation’s nuclear clean-up arm, British Nuclear
Group. (Pfeifer 2006)
By 2003 David Sainsbury had donated over £11 million to
the Labour Party. (Brennan & Hastings 1998) Mark Seddon, a
member of Labour’s National Executive Committee, referred to
Sainsbury in an interview with the BBC, in which he said:
‘In any other country I think a government minister
donating such vast amounts of money and effectively
buying a political party would be seen for what it is, a
form of corruption of the political process.’ (Brennan &
Hastings 1998)
In October 2005, having been made a Labour peer, he
declared his support for nuclear energy in the House of Lords,
saying, ‘Lady O’Cathain offered me the opportunity of…
Page 78
Summer 2011
Lobster 61agreeing that nuclear is a renewable energy source – it clearly
is so.’ (Mortished 2005). One month later, Vincent de Rivaz –
Chief Executive of EDF energy, which has at least two
contracts with British Nuclear Fuels plc (British Nuclear Group
2011) – called for the relaxation of planning and licensing
laws, arguing that if this were to happen, new nuclear power
stations could be built within ten years. (Parliament 2005) De
Rivaz’s more explicit connection with the New Labour
government was through Gordon Brown’s younger brother
Andrew, who joined EDF Energy, as head of media relations.
(He is now director of corporate communications.) Andrew
Brown previously worked for Weber Shandwick, where Philip
Dewhurst – now Director of Corporate Affairs at British Nuclear
Fuels – was the UK Chief Executive. (Private Eye 2006) Weber
Shandwick also provided consultancy services for British
Nuclear Fuels plc in 2005. (Register of members and clients
In 2009, EDF energy acquired British Energy, which owns
and operates two thirds of the UK’s nuclear power stations.
Incidentally, de Rivaz shared corporate ties with David
Sainsbury until 2010, as Sainsbury’s supermarket offered
‘Sainsbury’s Energy’ in a partnership with EDF. (Williams 2011)
The former Labour government Housing Minister, Yvette
Cooper, also has links to the nuclear industry through her
father, Tony Cooper, who is the former chairman of the
Nuclear Industry Association and is currently the director of
the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority. (Wheeler 2010a)
One might conclude that New Labour’s ties with the
nuclear lobby heavily influenced policy formulation with
regards to energy prioritisation.
Aisbitt, J. (1998) ‘Donations of More Than pounds 5,000 to
Labour in 1997’ – <www.independent.co.uk/news/donations-
Brennan, Z. & Hastings, C. (1998) ‘Lord “Midas” puts millions
Page 79
Summer 2011
Lobster 61Labour’s way’ – The Sunday Times, 30 August 1998
BBC (2001) ‘Murdoch and Freud wed’ – <http://news.bbc.co.
British Nuclear Fuels (2006) British Nuclear Fuels plc. –
Carrell, S. (2000) ‘Page told ministers to stay away from Dome’
– <www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/this-britain/page-told-
Guardian, author unknown (2000) ‘King of spin’ –
Harris, J. (2008) ‘Inside the court of London’s golden couple,
Elisabeth Murdoch and Matthew Freud’ – <www.guardian.co.
Mortished, C. (2005) ‘Minister declares nuclear “renewable” ’
– <http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_
Orange, R. (2005) ‘Rothschild Champions Nuclear Joint Venture
‘ – <http://scotlandonsunday.scotsman.com/energyutilities/
Parliament (2005) Uncorrected Transcript of Oral Evidence –
House of Commons – Environmental Audit Committee –
Pfeifer, S. (2006) ‘Rothschild to handle £1bn nuclear sale’ –
<www.telegraph.co.uk/ finance/2936854/Rothschild-to-
Private Eye, author unknown – Issue 1151, p.8 (2006)
Register of members and clients 2005
Sanghera, S. (2001) ‘Can Matthew Freud be serious?’ –
Page 80
Summer 2011
Lobster 61Shah, S. (2003) ‘Rothschild brought on board at Sky as sop to
anti-Murdoch camp’ – <www.independent.co.uk/news/media/
Wheeler, B. (2010a) ‘Labour and the nuclear lobby’ –
Williams, J. (2011) ‘Sainsbury’s Energy ditch EDF for
partnership with British Gas’ – <www.uk-business-news.co.uk/
Page 81
Summer 2011
Lobster 61

Edited by Macnamara
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...