Jump to content

Cap'n Mac's Pirate Republic!


Macnamara

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Macnamara said:

Diamonds are found in huge numbers in some meteorites. Now American astronomers have solved the mystery of where they come from: they are made in supernova explosions.

 

And if I remember my Physics correctly, all the elements heavier than iron are also created in supernovas, the ordinary nuclear fusion inside stars only produces up as far as iron. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Campion said:

And if I remember my Physics correctly, all the elements heavier than iron are also created in supernovas, the ordinary nuclear fusion inside stars only produces up as far as iron. 

 

So by calling their israeli chemtrail company 'stardust solutions' the implication is that the particles they intend to release into the atmosphere are ground up diamonds because according to that piece i posted stardust is made of diamonds...

 

I haven't seen hard proof of that yet, only a piece i posted above, from 2015, in which scientists were discussing the idea that diamond dust could be sprayed as particles into the atmosphere

 

But if i'm right about what's going on then this should be a huge story yet i can't see anyone talking about the spraying of diamond dust, from planes, in the alt media scene. But if you look at that piece i posted above about the condition caused by inhaling diamond dust (eg people working in the diamond trade) then it causes all the symptoms that have been discussed in the covid era: blood clots, cardiovascular issues, respiratory issues

Edited by Macnamara
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

But if i'm right about what's going on then this should be a huge story yet i can't see anyone talking about the spraying of diamond dust, from planes, in the alt media scene. But if you look at that piece i posted above about the condition caused by inhaling diamond dust (eg people working in the diamond trade) then it causes all the symptoms that have been discussed in the covid era: blood clots, cardiovascular issues, respiratory issues

 

if you make something that destroys peoples insides and you then deploy that into the skies above them, that is called a WEAPON. That would be a hot war weapon

 

The same is true if something intended to harm is injected into people under false pretenses. If anyone has any doubts about what is going on here in the wider picture:

US Covid Policy Scorecard Human Cost

February 15, 2024

US Covid Policy Scorecard Human Cost

2020
✅~458k all cause excess deaths
✅ Zero excess disabilities from trend

2021-2023
✅ ~1.1 million all cause excess deaths
✅~3.5 million excess disabilities from trend (population 16+)

— Edward Dowd (@DowdEdward) February 13, 2024

https://www.sgtreport.com/2024/02/us-covid-policy-scorecard-human-cost/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very refreshing to hear someone thinking clearly....it seems in such short supply these days:

The “they’re all in it together” rebuttal canard Multipolarity is a crock

Iain Davis
Feb 15, 2024
I am among a relatively small group of independent researchers and journalists who question the proposed multipolar world order.

One of the objections often thrown my (and our) way—by those who presumably support a new world order led by the BRICS+ group of nations—is that we critics of multipolarity are claiming, with regard to national governments, that “they’re all in it together.”

Having never once made that argument, constantly refuting it is very annoying. So let me outline why the “they’re all in it together” rebuttal is a canard.

Essentially the “all in it together” response runs something like this:

By only highlighting all the areas of agreement between East and West you are overlooking the very real geopolitical differences and conflicts between the two. You are claiming Putin is a WEF stooge and that Xi is a puppet of the White House. We only need to look at their statements and foreign policy commitments to know this isn’t true. Yours is a ridiculous argument, you stupid “they’re all in it together” proponent. Obviously you couldn’t be more wrong. 

While making this riposte suggests the defenders of multipolarity haven’t read anything we’ve written—or have deliberately misinterpreted it—it is a not a cogent argument in any event. It needs to be exposed.

The multipolar world order (MWO) is touted as a potential antidote to the current, claimed, international rules based order or system (IRBO). The IRBO emerged as the Western-led consensus on international relations under the “unipolar world order,” headed by the US / NATO alliance of nations states. The IRBO and unipolarity dominated geopolitics following the collapse of the Soviet Union.

The IRBO—and the unipolar world order—is predatory and serves the economic and geopolitical interests of Western developed nations, at the cost of everyone else. It has allowed the West to instigate, sponsor and engage in conflicts all over the world. The IRBO aligned nation states pillaged resources, installed puppet governments and exploited weaker nations as they liked. The IRBO is little more than a neocolonialist project of a public-private empire. There are no actual rules beyond “might is right.”

On this we can all agree. There’s nothing worth defending with regard to the IRBO.

The problems begin when you start pointing out that the MWO is not, in fact, an antidote to the IRBO. It is the evolution of the IRBO. Multipolarity is virtually an enabling act for a new system of global oppression and the transition to a new global economic model.

The is flatly denied by MWO advocates. The argument between MWO backers and opponents appears to be rooted in a dispute over the nature of oligarchy.

Hitherto, the numerous attempts by a global oligarchy to construct a “new world order” (NWO) were fiercely criticised by almost the entire Western “independent media.” The “global” reach of oligarchs—who care little for nation states—was consistently exposed and reported. Thoroughly researched historical evidence was published, and frequently cited, demonstrating that global power networks, combining both public and private institutions, existed above and beyond national government control.

Now, in the West, some segments of the so-called “independent media” are claiming that oligarchs do not manipulate “all” nation states. Certain countries, such as China, India, Iran and Russia, have allegedly brought their oligarchs to book to reestablish politician-led governmental authority over their respective polities.

Instead, the MWO pushers claim, we are witnessing the “return” of political realism. Apparently, that realism no longer includes analysis of oligarch influence.

The BRICS+ led nation states are opposing the rules of Western oligarchs. This supposedly explains why they want a MWO founded upon adherence to an allegedly real system of international law and multilateral decision making. The governments of these countries are no longer willing to suffer the tyranny of the Western oligarch-led IRBO.

Or so we are told.

It seems like a dwindling number of us in the “independent media” maintain that a “global public-private partnership” (G3P), controlled by a global network of oligarchs, still exists and is still intent upon establishing its NWO. We are Luddites because we keep banging on about the “fact” that certain policy commitments are common to all countries. No matter which side of the IRBO/MWO fence they sit.

All governments, in all major economies, are avid enthusiasts of SDGs, biosecurity, digitalisation, tokenisation, the censorship of “disinformation,” CBDC (digital money), population surveillance and, most crucially, global governance under the auspices of the United Nations (UN). We who criticise multipolarity, suggest these policy commitments can be viewed as the pillars of the modern NWO.

Further, the tiny band of MWO critics point out that agreement on the pillars, insisting they are all necessary, is practically unanimous among UN member states. What remains appears to be horse trading over who leads the MWO and how pillar policies will be implemented in respective nation states. Evidently, what is never up for debate is not implementing the pillars.

This suggests oligarchs exert external influence upon international relations, potentially leading to conflict. There is evidence of supranational sovereignty and political authority being exercised, right now, by a global network that operates beyond the reach of national governments.

“No, no, no” proclaim multipolarity’s advocates. No such evidence exists. Such oligarch control may occur but it only impacts the West.

All we need do is look at Ukraine or the the Middle East to see the very real conflict between East and West. When we look at the statements of people like Vladimir Putin, it is obvious that he is among the global leaders who oppose the Western-led IRBO and global control by “Western” oligarchs. The realpolitik tensions between adversarial nation states couldn’t be clearer. The BRICS+ nations are opposed to oligarchy. The MWO proposed by Putin and his fellow BRICS+ leaders is intended to deliver a better world.

MWO defenders absolutely deny that nearly all governments want to implement the pillars of the NWO and support the same global governance system, regardless of how blatantly obvious it is. And if it is true, they say, it doesn’t matter anyway. The MWO is how we will all defeat the IRBO—which is all that matters—and build a global community of sovereign nations states who will make fairer, multilateral global governance decisions.

The idea that “they’re all in it together” is preposterous, they claim. East and West are fighting each other for heaven’s sake, you fool. Get behind the right political leaders promising peace and stop doubting the good guys.

This rebuttal is like claiming that professional boxers beating each other to a pulp proves the pugilists are determined to resist the international boxing federation. It is tantamount to asserting that boardroom backstabbing is evidence that the corporate executives, enriched by the success of the company, are intent upon undermining the corporation they all profit from.

putin-medvedev-650x366.jpg?x53001

Not only is this geopolitical analysis predicated upon the idea that some politicians are suddenly trustworthy, and everything they say somehow constitutes evidence, it completely dismisses everything we have learned from historical researchers like Norman Dodd, Antony C. Sutton, Carrol Quigley, G. Edward Griffin, Patrick Wood and many more. It is as if history is no longer relevant.

No one who criticises multipolarity denies the reality of geopolitical competition; none of us think violent conflicts and wars between nation states and their proxies aren’t real; not a single voice, warning against the MWO, thinks people aren’t being killed as governments fight for supremacy and no one is arguing that governments are “all in it together”—assuming “it” refers to the creation of a multipolar world order.

Quite evidently, there is very real and bitter conflict between nations and it is causing immense suffering. In fact, one of our chief concerns is that the transition to a MWO will cause significantly more suffering.

What we are saying is that there is no disagreement on the pillars from any quarter. But this is no claim that national governments are “all in it together.” On the contrary, the fact that there is both conflict and, at the same time, global agreement on the pillars, suggests a “geopolitical reality” that no member of the multipolar fan club seemingly wants to discuss.

Agreement on the pillars does not suggest all national governments are of one, single hive mind. It suggests that governments do not control the global governance system. They are subject to it, just like the rest of us. The best they can achieve is “partner” status. And they are not senior partners.

The pillars did not originate with national governments. The pillars were mapped out by public-private globalist think tanks and international organisations that serve the interests of oligarchs.

As the Chinese government openly declares:

China maintains that for the world, there is only one system, which is the international system with the United Nations at its core, that there is only one order, which is the international order based on international law, and that there is only one set of rules, which is the basic norms governing international relations based on the purposes and principles of the UN Charter. China actively participates in and leads the reform of the global governance system.

This “leadership” is transitioning the world to precisely the global governance system, replete with its SDGs, CBDC (digital money), surveillance, censorship and centralised global control of all nation states, that the oligarchs want. It is a bid to install the latest iteration of the “New World Order.”

This is also the global tyranny that, until very recently, nearly every Western commentator in the “independent media” was warning against.

Now, a growing chorus is suggesting we should accept the MWO because it will allegedly defeat the IRBO. This is a false dichotomy and a propagandist trap.

The IRBO is undoubtedly on its way out, but global oligarch networks haven’t suddenly vanished. Far from it. We only need look at recent events to see who is actually profiting from them. The IRBO’s demise is necessary for the birth of the MWO, and through it, establishment of the oligarch’s NWO global governance technocracy.

The irony is that the Eastern independent media—where it exists—continues to question the oppression of global governance and remains highly critical of it. Yet some in the Western independent media seem pathologically averse to even acknowledging, let alone reporting, criticisms made by Russian independent commentators, for example.

As multipolar advocates claim that none of this is true, then I ask them to provide some evidence of one major economy that is not erecting the pillars. Can the MWO campaigners please explain how it is possible that all leading economies are pursuing the same policy platforms, simultaneously, without centralised, global coordination and policy control?

As multipolar supporters rightly point out, governments from East and West are evidently at loggerheads on numerous issues. They do not agree and they are not “all in it together.”

So why are they all implementing the same pillar policies? Where is the global policy coordination coming from if not from antagonistic “sovereign” nation states?

We who question multipolarity do not believe that any system of global governance can possibly serve the interests of humanity. Such as system is, by default, designed to benefit oligarchs, not the people.

Yes, the conflicts are all too real, but they are clearly battles for position within one, agreed and accepted global governance system. The NWO pillars are already being put in place in nearly every nation state because governments are beholden  to their oligarchs. While oligarchs occasionally disagree amongst themselves, the global network of oligarchs want their NWO technocracy above all else.

Criticising the MWO is met with denial, refusal to debate and strawman arguments. It is false to allege that the critics of multipolarity assert that all governments are “in it together.” Governments are subservient to a global governance hierarchy they don’t control.

The oligarch’s NWO is being sold to us as the multipolar world order and, for some reason, it is receiving widespread support from sections of the Western independent media.

You can read more of Iain’s work at his blog IainDavis.com (Formerly InThisTogether) or on UK Column or follow him on Twitter or subscribe to his SubStack. His new book Pseudopandemic, is now available, in both in kindle and paperback, from Amazon and other sellers. Or you can claim a free copy by subscribing to his newsletter.

https://off-guardian.org/2024/02/15/the-theyre-all-in-it-together-rebuttal-canard/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/9/2024 at 7:15 PM, Macnamara said:

Graphite

Under high pressures and temperatures it converts to diamond. Graphite (/ˈɡræft/) is a crystalline form of the element carbon. It consists of stacked layers of graphene.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphite

   

 

maybe this is a stupid question but....all these people finding 'graphene' in blood samples....what if some of it is diamond dust? Is it possible that the two viewed at the nanoscale could be confused?

 

what if we are breathing diamond dust and also being injected with it? double whammy. i guess it depends what you think the agenda is here.....is it to hook us all upto the AI hive mind through nano-smart-dust or is it simply to bump us off? If it is to bump us off then diamond dust would be the way to go as the condition caused by it is easy to confuse with other conditions so no one would likely make the connection. if the agenda is to keep us alive but hooked up to the AI hivemind then why are so many people dying and reporting respiratory issues, blood clots and cardiovascular issues?

Edited by Macnamara
Link to comment
Share on other sites

oh look the Feds are getting into their fancy dress again to try and create the perception of a 'white supremacy' bogeyman....clowns:

“Feds!” – Neo-Nazi Wannabes March Through Nashville Streets Waving Swastika Flags (VIDEO)

by Jim Hᴏft Feb. 17, 2024 8:00 pm

Members of the so-called neo-Nazi group, known as the “Blood Tribe,” were seen proudly displaying swastika flags during a march in downtown Nashville, Tennessee.

The event, which occurred on Saturday, saw these individuals donning red T-shirts emblazoned with ‘Blood Tribe’ on the back, as they paraded through the city’s heart.

Videos quickly surfaced on social media platforms, sparking outrage and leading to claims that the marchers were federal agents in disguise.

One user said, “Feds are in Nashville today playing dress up Nazi.”

nazi-sympathizer-1536x864.jpg

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/02/feds-neo-nazi-wannabes-march-through-nashville-streets/?utm_source=rss

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/3/2020 at 9:53 PM, Macnamara said:

Disruption to cell membrane affecting hemostasis?

 

There are reports of issues occurring with people suffering from coagulation of the blood which is being labelled 'covid'. Covid is acute respiratory distress which the official narrative is blaming on a novel virus they have named sars cov 2.

 

My hypothesis is that we aren't dealing with a novel virus however and are instead dealing with an abnormal physiologic condition caused by exposure to harmful environmental factors such as microwave radiation from 5G and/or viral interference from flu vaccinations.

 

Non-localised thickening of the blood could be caused by some process in the body either being switched on or being switched off by that environmental factor. If Thrombin is the sole relevant initiator of coagulation then could there be some non localised injury that is affecting the ability of cells to control the nature of their membrane surface which may then be affecting thrombin production?

 

a non localised injury could be caused by diamond dust inhaled, ingested, injected or combinations of the above...

 

On 11/11/2020 at 7:49 PM, Macnamara said:

The Coranaid

 

The Coranaid were a race of malevolent beings who came from asia and enslaved the britons in the Mabinogion. They appeared impossible to defeat as they had the ability to always hear what their enemies were saying which allowed them to always be one step ahead.

In the end the britons learned that if you crushed a certain insect and mixed it with water you could cast this over the coranaid and it destroyed them but didn't harm the britons. They were driven from the land and the people enjoyed freedom again.

 

what if the coranaid are back and aren't crushing up insects but diamonds...

 

I was thinking about the 'shedding' issue and the diamond dust theory would explain that too because if we are all being sprayed with diamond dust then both the jabbed and the unjabbed would experience symptoms though obviously the worst affected would be those who have also had the jabs and therefore been injected with diamond dust (most excess deaths are amongst the jabbed, as you would expect).

Edited by Macnamara
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/9/2024 at 7:15 PM, Macnamara said:

April 16, 2023

Cesare Marchetti passed away this morning in Tuscany just short of his 96th birthday. 

Cesare was one of the inventors of geoengineering. His most cited paper is On geoengineering and the CO2 problem (1977).

https://phe.rockefeller.edu/news/2023/04/16/passing-of-cesare-marchetti/

 

Biography of Cesare Marchetti

1958-59

Head of Physical Chemistry Division, Agip Nucleare

Subjects: Graphite radiation stability

https://web.archive.org/web/20070205132218/http:/cesaremarchetti.org/bio.php

 

so cesare marchetti was one of the inventors of geoengineering who worked on 'graphite radiation stability' within the nuclear sector and now 5 days ago this article speaks of the 'stardust solutions' start up company from israel and has this to say about them:

Scientists Resort to Once-Unthinkable Solutions to Cool the Planet

Story by Eric Niiler • 5d

 

In Israel, a startup called Stardust Solutions has begun testing a system to disperse a cloud of tiny reflective particles about 60,000 feet in altitude, reflecting sunlight away from Earth to cool the atmosphere in a concept known as solar radiation management, or SRM. Yanai Yedvab, Stardust chief executive and a former deputy chief scientist at the Israel Atomic Energy Commission, wouldn’t disclose the composition of the proprietary particles.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/scientists-resort-to-once-unthinkable-solutions-to-cool-the-planet/ar-BB1ig98h

 

Why won't you disclose the composition of the proprietary particles Yanai? What are you hiding? What is that nano-dust you are spraying?

 

IMO when they conduct these sort of experiments it is so that they can make a move to normalise and legitimise actions they are already conducting, just like how the british intelligence services were spying on peoples online activities so they legalised it by creating the 'snoopers charter'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

New Government-Funded Study Found Virtually No Dental Benefit From Fluoridation.

A new study using dental insurance records of 6.4 million adults in England found essentially no reduction in tooth decay for those living in fluoridated areas. This study “should be the last nail in the coffin of fluoridation” argue the Fluoride Action Network (FAN), who have continuously fought against the use of fluoride due to its harm to health.

The LOTUS study, which is the largest ever study of the effects of fluoridation on the dental health of adults was funded by the UK Department of Health, and was intended to inform policy-makers of what to expect for future dental and economic outcomes from the current plan to expand fluoridation to all of England. However, the study found “exceedingly small” reductions in caries most people would not consider meaningful.

An economic cost-benefit analysis found individuals would only save about $1 a year in dental expenses, a savings that wouldn’t even pay for a cup of coffee. The authors cautioned, however, that their economic analysis did not take into account the capital costs of expanding fluoridation, which could easily tip their economic estimates of fluoridation to a net loss. Millions would be spent for virtually no benefit.

The Cost of Fluoridation Health Harms

The Fluoride Action Network (FAN), who are dedicated to protecting public health by ending water fluoridation and other involuntary exposures to fluoride say that what is far more important, but omitted from the economic analysis, are the costs from health harms caused by fluoridation. “70% of children in fluoridated parts of the U.S. now have dental fluorosis” FAN claim and say that “the cost of cosmetic dentistry to correct what can be an unsightly condition even in its so-called “mild” stage, would exceed the marginal 2% cavity reduction found by the LOTUS study.

Screenshot-2024-02-16-at-10.01.33-AM-261

The Fluoride Action Network (FAN) seeks to broaden awareness among citizens, scientists, and policymakers on the toxicity of fluoride compounds. FAN provides comprehensive and up-to-date information and remains vigilant in monitoring government agency actions that impact the public’s exposure to fluoride. The information and studies cited below have been sourced from various pages of FAN’s website “the Fluoride Alert

Developmental Neurotoxicity

FAN argue that additionally, the neurotoxic effects of fluoride were not mentioned in the study. Yet the scientific evidence is now strong that fluoridated water can harm the developing brain and cause reduced IQ in children. The economic cost of nation-wide “brain drain” would certainly dwarf the costs of filling a few cavities.

image-168.png?resize=549%2C301&ssl=1

A tremendous amount of research has been conducted on the association of exposure to fluoride with developmental neurotoxicity and over 60 studies have reported reduced IQ in children and several on the impaired learning/memory in animals. There are also studies which link fluoride to Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, according to Fluoride Alert.

As of July 18, 2022, a total of 85 human studies have investigated the relationship between fluoride and human intelligence and off these investigations, 76 studies have reported that elevated fluoride exposure is associated with reduced IQ in humans. The studies which reported the association, are based on IQ/cognitive examinations of 28,234 children (73 studies) and 689 adults (3 studies).

The Fetal Brain

There is also evidence of neurological damage from three Chinese studies that have investigated fluoride’s effect on the fetal brain and each found significant neurological damage, including neuronal degeneration and reduced levels of neurotransmitters such as norepinephrine.

image-169.png?resize=400%2C300&ssl=1

FAN write that one of the studies by Yu (1996) noted that “when norepinephrine levels drop the ability to maintain an appropriate state of activation in the central nervous system is weakened.” Studies of fluoride-treated animals have reported similar effects, including lower levels of norepinephrine. (Kaur 2009; Li 1994).

The human placenta does not prevent the passage of fluoride from a pregnant mother’s bloodstream to the fetus. As a result, a fetus can be harmed by fluoride ingested pregnancy. Based on research from China, the fetal brain is one of the organs susceptible to fluoride poisoning.

In the 1960s, the FDA banned the use of prenatal fluoride supplements based on its concern about possible untoward effects on the fetus. If a pregnant woman receives a fluoride gel treatment from the dentist, her blood fluoride levels can go extremely high for up to 15 hours, exceeding the reported short-term exposure levels that impair glucose metabolism and kidney function in human adults and sperm quality in rams. The potential ramifications of these fluoride spikes on the health of the fetus has not been considered in the literature to date.

The Mother-Offspring IQ studies

Additionally, 9 Mother-Offspring IQ studies, have all measured the pregnant woman’s urinary fluoride levels and paired cognitive testing with their offspring at various ages up to 12 years.

Each study found a lowered IQ in offspring from women with higher fluoride levels in their urine. Studies by Green et al. (2019) and Till et al. (2020) compared women living in fluoridated and non-fluoridated communities in Canada. The authors reported lower IQ in children from women living in the fluoridated communities.

These studies have alerted the public health community to the fact that the fetus is the most susceptible to fluoride’s toxicity, yet public health officials have done nothing to alert pregnant woman or the medical community to these findings. Source.

Fluoridated Toothpaste.

A major source of fluoride exposure is through dental products such as toothpastes, mouth rinses, fluoride gels, fluoride varnishes, and fluoride supplements and this is particularly so for children.

image-170.png?resize=639%2C378&ssl=1

Over 95% of toothpastes now contain fluoride and just a single strip of toothpaste covering the length of a child’s brush contains between 0.75 to 1.5 mg of fluoride exceeding the amount of fluoride in most prescription fluoride supplements (0.25 to 1.0 mg), claims Fluoride Alert, who also say that “many young children swallow over 50% of the paste added to their brush, particularly if they use candy-flavoured varieties and if they are not supervised during brushing to ensure they spit and fully rinse.”

Research has shown that some children swallow more fluoride from toothpaste alone than is recommended from all sources combined and although dentists now recommend that children only use “a pea-sized amount” of toothpaste, many children use more than this, particularly when the toothpaste has bubble gum and watermelon flavours.

Ingesting toothpaste during childhood is a major risk factor for dental fluorosis, and can also cause symptoms of acute fluoride toxicity (e.g., stomach pain, etc).

“The FDA now requires a poison warning on all fluoride toothpastes sold in the U.S” say FAN

No Benefits but so Much Harm.

It is obvious that Fluoridation is detrimental to health and should have been banned a long time ago, and this is especially true when it is known that is has only a tiny amount of benefit to dental health. The new LOTUS study has followed a companion study in children, the CATFISH study, that found fluoridation produced similarly minuscule benefits finding only 0.3 fewer cavities per child from fluoridation, and there was confounding in the study that might have caused even that small benefit to be exaggerated. Source

When fluoridation was first introduced 80 years ago in the U.S., it was touted as reducing tooth decay by 60% or more. By the beginning of this century, the U.S. CDC had tempered its claim of effectiveness to about 30%. Rigorous systematic reviews by the Cochrane Collaborative warned that even that claim was based on low-quality studies, almost all of which were from before the mid-1970s, when fluoridated toothpaste started to become widely used.

“Tooth decay rates in all developed countries have dropped dramatically since the 1970s, but only a few of the countries are fluoridated, so fluoridation could not be the reason.” said FAN, and “Under today’s conditions, the LOTUS and CATFISH studies have found almost no reduction of tooth decay in fluoridated areas compared to non-fluoridated.”Source

Therefore, there is no need to continue fluoridation, let alone expand it” argues the Fluoride Action Network, who state that “The economic argument for fluoridation has reversed: more money will be saved by stopping fluoridation than starting it. Setting aside the economic argument, the likely loss of IQ in children means it is doing more harm than good. and “The LOTUS study should be the last nail in the coffin of fluoridation.

Source – The Fluoride Action Network – online at https://fluoridealert.org/

https://expose-news.com/2024/02/19/new-government-funded-study-found-virtually-no-dental-benefit-from-fluoridation/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fascism: Liberal Policies Transferring Taxpayer Money to Corporations

Liberal policies meet the definition of Fascism: Money for migrants, vaccine requirements, and diversity, equity, and inclusion are government policies that enrich a small number of favored and obedient private companies at taxpayers’ expense.

Liberals call everyone they hate a fascist. However, fascism is a form of state capitalism and is much closer to liberal policies than conservative ones. Conservatives advocate for more individual choice and fewer government regulations in commerce and private life. On the other hand, liberals seek more government intervention, increased spending, free money, and greater compliance.

Conservatives effectively say, “Eat what you want, but you pay for it.” Liberals say, “The government will pay for it, but you have to eat what we tell you.” The government gets to pick which restaurants receive the tax dollars paying for the meal and who gets to eat the meal, but all working people have to pay for the meal through taxes, whether they eat or not.

 

Some states and municipalities are mandating that students have COVID shots as a requirement for attendance. The parents pay school taxes (property tax), but the children can be barred if they do not comply with COVID and vaccine requirements. The vaccines are distributed by for-profit, private companies selected by the government. And the program is ultimately paid for by taxpayers. Ironically, a parent can pay both the school tax and the income tax funding the vaccine requirements and still have their children excluded from school because they refused to comply.

New York City will be handing out prepaid debit cards to migrants. The government chooses who gets the cards. The government also selects which company provides the cards. Taxpayers foot the bill for the cards but do not receive them. Furthermore, the cards are being issued in a $53 million no-bid deal awarded to Mobility Capital Finance, which Mayor Adams said he chose because it was “minority-owned.” This raises another aspect of fascism: compliance with government edicts. Diversity, equity, inclusion (DEI) is a rallying cry of liberals, and there has been a push to only award state and federal contracts to private companies that meet DEI standards. This is a textbook example of fascism.

Fascism is often referred to as corporatism or state capitalism. It is a political ideology characterized by centralized control with private ownership. At the extreme ends, socialism, communism, and fascism look very similar. Nazism is actually national socialism, another ironic point because liberals swear they are against Nazism but then advocate for national socialism. All four ideologies require authoritarianism to function. Socialism and communism distribute earnings from hardworking people to non-working people. Since wage-earners would not willingly give their money away, the state has to force them.

The difference between communism and fascism is that in communism, all companies are state-owned, and the state decides the quantity, price, and type of products produced, as well as who gets them. In fascism, the companies remain privately owned, but the state makes laws and edicts that effectively transfer taxpayer money to favored private companies. Publicly, these companies show their virtue by dutifully supporting government policies. However, their public service announcements fail to explain that the company profits from the policy.

Walmart and Amazon supporting a $15 minimum wage is a really good example. These large companies can afford to pay a higher wage than smaller competitors. So, Walmart instituted a $14-$19 minimum wage for its employees, while Amazon has a $15 minimum wage. The liberal media then provided Walmart and Amazon with priceless free advertising by reporting on their commitment to higher wages. Walmart and Amazon then gain political favor by coordinating with liberals in Congress pushing for a $15 federally enforced minimum wage. Ultimately, the $15 minimum wage will drive smaller competitors out of business. Furthermore, Walmart and Amazon supported politicians calling for a federal law requiring federal contracts to only be awarded to companies that pay a $15 minimum wage.

Liberals claim their policies are helping the poor, but in actuality, they are increasing the wealth gap. Increased wages for unskilled work are driving up the cost of goods, particularly food, which disproportionately hurts the poor, as they spend a larger percentage of their income on food and basic necessities. Small companies are driven out of business. People supplementing their income through gig work may be excluded from lucrative government contracts because they cannot meet minimum wage or DEI requirements. Furthermore, while woke companies virtue signal by raising their minimum wage and complying with DEI, they also engage in massive layoffs because they cannot pay higher wages and remain profitable. The laid-off workers will then rely on government transfers, unemployment and welfare paid for by those still working.

As more small companies are forced to close and more workers are driven out of the workforce, the tax burden on the remaining workers will increase. These workers can only keep their jobs if they comply with laws, edicts, and policies ranging from vaccines to DEI. Meanwhile, these laws and policies will continue to enrich a smaller number of favored private companies. And that is the definition of fascism.

https://www.womensystems.com/2024/02/fascism-liberal-policies-transferring.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

they would call you a nasty name for even noticing....

 

 

 

you don't say....

US vetoes Algerian resolution demanding immediate ceasefire in Gaza

20 February 2024

The UN Security Council met again in emergency session in New York on Gaza Tuesday, where the United States vetoed a resolution put forward on behalf of Arab States by Algeria demanding “an immediate humanitarian ceasefire that must be respected by all parties”.

The latest Council meeting on the Middle East crisis spiralling outwards from the war in Gaza has ended, with another US veto and an abstention on the part of the UK, while Algeria's resolution gained support from 13 out of the 15 members around the iconic horseshoe table.

https://news.un.org/en/story/2024/02/1146697

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not incompetence, it's CONSPIRACY!

 

4wknfz.jpg

A Digital Coup d’Etat

February 22, 2024  
 

For those of us schooled in the persistent incompetence of government to get anything right, much less deploy a plan with anything like precision, elaborate conspiracy theories of plots and schemes always seem implausible. We just don’t believe them. 

This is why it took us so long to see the fullness of what was deployed in March 2020, a scheme that combined a plethora of seemingly disparate governmental/industrial ambitions including: 

1) rollout of subscription/platform model of Pharma distribution, 

2) mass censorship, 

3) election management/rigging, 

4) universal basic income,

5) industrial subsidies to digital platforms,

6) mass population surveillance, 

7) cartelization of industry, 

8) shift in income distribution and entrenchment of administrative state power, 

9) crushing of ‘populist’ movements worldwide, and 

10) the centralization of power generally speaking. 

To top it off, all these efforts were global in scope. This whole model truly stretches the bounds of plausibility. And yet all the evidence points to exactly the above. It just goes to show that even if you don’t believe in conspiracies, conspiracies believe in you. It was a digital-age coup d’etat unlike anything humanity has ever experienced. 

How long will it take us to process this reality? We seem to be only at the early stages of understanding, much less resisting. 

https://brownstone.org/articles/a-digital-coup-detat/

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reporter goes viral for attacking Christians who believe rights come from God — and the responses are glorious

February 23, 2024

Politico reporter Heidi Przybyla claimed on Thursday that Christians who believe rights are derived from God are "Christian nationalists."

Speaking on MSNBC, Przybyla claimed that former President Donald Trump is surrounding himself with an "extremist element" of Christians, whom she identified as "Christian nationalists."

That's when things got weird. According to Przybyla, there is one belief that all so-called Christian nationalists share.

"[T]he thing that unites them as Christian nationalists — not Christians, by the way, because Christian nationalist is very different — is that they believe that our rights as Americans, as all human beings, don't come from any earthly authority. They don't come from Congress. They don't come to the Supreme Court. They come from God."

The "problem" with believing that rights come from God, Przybyla claimed, is that "men" misapply "so-called natural law" to oppose progressive issues, like abortion, sex education in schools, IVF, and gay marriage.

There is an obvious problem with Przybyla's argument: the Declaration of Independence. Philosophical debates about "rights" aside, the founding document is clear that rights are not derived from man like Przybyla claimed.

The Declaration of Independence declares:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

The Founding Fathers, then, were aware of the dangers of a government being empowered to control rights: if the government giveth, then government can taketh. But if fundamental rights are ultimately derived from God, no government can take them.

Przybyla comments went viral on Friday afternoon and triggered an avalanche of mockery:

  • "Our rights as human beings don’t come from the Constitution, the government, Congress, the president, or the Supreme Court. They are inherent. ... This belief that rights precede government—regardless of whether you believe in God—is fundamental to what it means to be an American," former Rep. Justin Amash said.
  • "Is someone’s ignorance and religious bigotry showing?" Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) asked in response.
  • "What the state gives the state can take away. What God gives the state takes at its moral peril. Sincerely, The prophets of old," Jordan Peterson responded.
  • "Human rights come from God. That’s why all human beings have innate value and no human entity has the authority to strip them of those rights. That belief doesn’t make millions of Christians around the world Christian nationalists," AND Campaign president Justin Giboney responded.
  • "We are all Christian Nationalists now," pastor Tom Ascol responded.
  • "I guess those truths just aren't as self-evident as they used to be," National Review writer Dan McLaughlin mocked.
  • "This is what secularists want you to believe. If your rights originate from government, then the government is ultimate and statism becomes the dominant belief. But God is ultimate and human rights come from God," pastor Grant Castleberry pointed out.
  • "Imagine believing your rights come 'from Congress,'" Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) mocked.
  • "This is a civics failure, a talent failure, an intelligence failure, a historical failure, an ethics failure...shall I keep going?" professor Andrew Walker pointed out.
  • "I can only suppose that this is what comes of liberal elites living in a bubble. They speak with supreme confidence only to reveal spectacular ignorance--of history, philosophy, the beliefs of the people they regard as their intellectual and moral inferiors and hold in contempt," professor Robert George responded.

Przybyla responded to the controversy by gaslighting, claiming she did not say what everyone heard her say. And yet, she somehow also managed to double down.

"While there are different wings of Christian Nationalism, they are bound by their belief that our rights come from God," she said on social media. "If you are Hindu, Jewish etc, this might help you understand the next part of my point, which is they are using this for a man-made policy agenda."

https://www.theblaze.com/news/heidi-przybyla-christians-rights-god?utm_source=theblaze-dailyAM

Mark Passio - De Facto Satanism

 

Edited by Macnamara
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Diamond Necklace Affair

 

In 1785 a dispatch rider was struck dead by lightening. The Bavarian authorities searched the body to identify the man and found documentation connecting him to the bavarian illuminati and a plot to remove the monarchies of Europe. Many truthers also want an end to monarchies but lets keep in mind that the goals of the illuminati are not to liberate man from authority but rather to replace all existing structures with their own world government run by them. This knowledge requires us to be streetwise about how we move forward.

 

The illuminati orchestrated the French Revolution. In 1789 the Duke of Orleans, head of the Grand Orient Freemasonic Lodge, bought up all the grain in France and sold it abroad or concealed it in order to create a state of starvation amongst the general populace. Meanwhile a whispering campaign was begun by the illuminati masons amongst the general populace which pointed the finger at their local aristocracy and the royal family.

 

The court magician of Louis XIV, Cagliostro, wrote:

''By march 1789, the 266 lodges controlled by the Grand Orient were all illuminized without knowing it, for the freemasons in general, were not told the name of the sect that brought them these mysteries, and only a small number were really initiated into the secret.''

 

The radical core of the revolutionary movement, The Jacobin Club, was created by illuminized french and german freemasons and part of their intriguing which led to the downfall of the french monarchy was the forging of Queen Marie Antoinette's signature in order to claim that she had approved the purchase of an expensive diamond necklace using public funds. However despite being offered the necklace twice from the crown's jewellers she had refused it both times. The claim that Antoinette said 'let them [the french peasantry] eat cake' on learning of their starvation is likely part of the whispering campaign launched by the illuminati and never in fact occurred.

 

A rent-a-mob of disgruntled radicals was brought into paris from outside whose pockets were filled with illuminati money much like the colour revolution mobs paid by george soros today. That mob stormed the bastille and grabbed the weapons and powder contained within sparking the violence that fanned outwards across the country.

 

As the flames of the scandal relating the allegations against the queen were fanned by the illuminati network Cagliostro, a known forger, was arrested as a possible suspect in the plot against the queen. He was later released and others blamed for the crime however if I were to investigate the affair i would open up a line of enquiry into cagliostro. My reasoning for this is not only his history as a petty criminal but also his connections to the sabbatean network.

 

Cagliostro moved around a lot, likely to stay ahead of his crimes but possibly also as an agent of the occult network. In London he trained in occult arts under Haim Falk who was the Baal Shem (mystic, healer, seer) of the jewish community in London. Falk was accused by Rabbi Jacob Emden of being a sabbatean because of his dealings with Moses David of Podhayce, who was a known sabbatean and associate of Jonathan Eybeschutz (see my post earlier in this thread about the Emden-Eybeschutz Controversy). Haim Falk had himself fled to London, from Germany, where he was in danger of being burned at the stake as a sorcerer. Despite fleeing in poverty he was soon established in London as the wealthy head of a synagogue. Haim Falk was in communication with the Duke of Orleans and may have been a fundraiser, in London, for the Dukes subversive schemes in France. Haim Falk was also an associate of the Rothschilds.

 

As public opinion swung against the queen and king the jacobin revolutionaries were able to launch a campaign of terror and bloodletting in france which remains a 'republic' to this day. The current president of France is Macron who prior to his career in politics worked for a bank owned by the Rothschilds. Macron presided over the covid jab roll out and the recent changes to french law which outlaw criticism of the mRNA jabs. If we are to return their favour in kind we could summarise their position towards the french people as 'let them inject themselves with poison.'

Edited by Macnamara
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/20/2023 at 1:18 PM, Macnamara said:

the NIC said.

The assessment dismisses calls for hydrogen to be piped into homes for heating and cooking, arguing it will saddle consumers with massive extra costs.

It says: “Gas boilers need to be phased out and replaced by heat pumps. There is no public policy case for hydrogen to be used to heat individual buildings. It should be ruled out as an option.”

The Government pushed back against the findings, insisting that the gas network would “always be part of our energy system” and that it was still exploring what role hydrogen will play.

 

That was interesting about doubting hydrogen use proposals Aka- suspected anti-proposals for it's use to individual homes , I wonder how that is going 16 months later?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/8/2020 at 4:38 PM, Macnamara said:

MHRA awarded over £980,000 for collaboration with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the World Health Organisation

MHRA today announced a partnership worth over £980,000 to improve the safety monitoring of medicines in low and middle-income countries.

On 2/27/2024 at 8:28 PM, rebornsteve said:

 

IMG_4583.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why spend all that money on making sure they are 'safe' (as in safely delivered as in satisfying the ill deeds of the manufacturers and genocide-ists) when they (the vaccines) are patently not safe, nor designed to be safe. This is a good starter question for any newbie on the forum.

Edited by Certified Green of Heart
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Federal Reserve Cartel: The Eight Families

Part I of a five-part series

Global Research, January 23, 2024

The Four Horsemen of Banking (Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, Citigroup and Wells Fargo) own the Four Horsemen of Oil (Exxon Mobil, Royal Dutch/Shell, BP and Chevron Texaco); in tandem with Deutsche Bank, BNP, Barclays and other European old money behemoths. But their monopoly over the global economy does not end at the edge of the oil patch.

According to company 10K filings to the SEC, the Four Horsemen of Banking are among the top ten stock holders of virtually every Fortune 500 corporation.[1]

So who then are the stockholders in these money center banks?

This information is guarded much more closely. My queries to bank regulatory agencies regarding stock ownership in the top 25 US bank holding companies were given Freedom of Information Act status, before being denied on “national security” grounds. This is rather ironic, since many of the bank’s stockholders reside in Europe.

One important repository for the wealth of the global oligarchy that owns these bank holding companies is US Trust Corporation – founded in 1853 and now owned by Bank of America. A recent US Trust Corporate Director and Honorary Trustee was Walter Rothschild. Other directors included Daniel Davison of JP Morgan Chase, Richard Tucker of Exxon Mobil, Daniel Roberts of Citigroup and Marshall Schwartz of Morgan Stanley. [2]

J. W. McCallister, an oil industry insider with House of Saud connections, wrote in The Grim Reaper that information he acquired from Saudi bankers cited 80% ownership of the New York Federal Reserve Bank- by far the most powerful Fed branch- by just eight families, four of which reside in the US. They are the Goldman Sachs, Rockefellers, Lehmans and Kuhn Loebs of New York; the Rothschilds of Paris and London; the Warburgs of Hamburg; the Lazards of Paris; and the Israel Moses Seifs of Rome.

CPA Thomas D. Schauf corroborates McCallister’s claims, adding that ten banks control all twelve Federal Reserve Bank branches.

He names N.M. Rothschild of London, Rothschild Bank of Berlin, Warburg Bank of Hamburg, Warburg Bank of Amsterdam, Lehman Brothers of New York, Lazard Brothers of Paris, Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York, Israel Moses Seif Bank of Italy, Goldman Sachs of New York and JP Morgan Chase Bank of New York.

Schauf lists William Rockefeller, Paul Warburg, Jacob Schiff and James Stillman as individuals who own large shares of the Fed. [3]

The Schiffs are insiders at Kuhn Loeb. The Stillmans are Citigroup insiders, who married into the Rockefeller clan at the turn of the century.

Eustace Mullins came to the same conclusions in his book The Secrets of the Federal Reserve, in which he displays charts connecting the Fed and its member banks to the families of Rothschild, Warburg, Rockefeller and the others. [4]

The control that these banking families exert over the global economy cannot be overstated and is quite intentionally shrouded in secrecy. Their corporate media arm is quick to discredit any information exposing this private central banking cartel as “conspiracy theory”. Yet the facts remain.

read on here: https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-federal-reserve-cartel-the-eight-families/25080

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Rishi Sunak refuses to say if he will profit from Moderna Covid vaccine

Tue 17 Nov 2020 08.39 EST
The chancellor, Rishi Sunak, has refused to disclose whether he will profit from a surge in the share price of the Covid-19 vaccine manufacturer Moderna, one of the biggest investments held by the hedge fund he co-founded before entering parliament.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/nov/17/rishi-sunak-refuses-to-say-if-he-will-profit-from-moderna-covid-vaccine

What is Infosys? Who owns the Indian IT giant? How is it linked to the Prime Minister? And why does Rishi Sunak's wife Akshata Murty earn millions from it?

  • The PM's wife Akshata Murty owns almost 39 million shares in her father's firm

By Greg Heffer, Political Correspondent For Mailonline

Published: 12:10 EST, 25 April 2023 | Updated: 12:27 EST, 25 April 2023 

Rishi Sunak is continuing to face scrutiny over his family's financial affairs following a recent row over his wife's investments.

The Prime Minister is being investigated by a parliamentary watchdog over his failure to declare Akshata Murty's shareholding in a childcare business.

This is among a number of shareholdings Ms Murty holds both directly and through her venture capital investment company, Catamaran Ventures UK.

But the bulk of her wealth most likely comes from her shares in Infosys, the Indian IT giant.

What is Infosys?

Infosys is a global technology company headquartered in Bangalore.

It is India's second-largest IT services exporter and is estimated to be worth $62billion (£50billion).

According to the company's website, it is 'a global leader in next-generation digital services and consulting' and works across more than 50 countries.

Does Infosys have any Government contracts?

According to the Government's 'Contracts Finder' website, Infosys has been granted public sector contracts worth more than £172million since 2015.

The latest was a £1.76m contract with Transport for London, which began in January this year.

The largest public sector contract held by Infosys was a £95m deal with Transport for London between 2015 to 2017 for an 'IT Solutions Framework'.

The 'Contracts Finder' website does not list any Infosys contracts with either the Cabinet Office or the Treasury - the two Whitehall departments Mr Sunak has headed during his time in Government.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12011923/What-Infosys-linked-Rishi-Sunak.html

Neil Oliver TEARS into 'unelected PUPPET' Rishi Sunak for 'GASLIGHTING' the British people

 

Edited by Macnamara
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Optogenetics and remote control

 

A wireless, implantable optoelectrochemical probe for optogenetic stimulation and dopamine detection

Microsystems & Nanoengineering volume 6, Article number: 64 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Physical and chemical technologies have been continuously progressing advances in neuroscience research. The development of research tools for closed-loop control and monitoring neural activities in behaving animals is highly desirable. In this paper, we introduce a wirelessly operated, miniaturized microprobe system for optical interrogation and neurochemical sensing in the deep brain. Via epitaxial liftoff and transfer printing, microscale light-emitting diodes (micro-LEDs) as light sources and poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) polystyrene sulfonate (PEDOT:PSS)-coated diamond films as electrochemical sensors are vertically assembled to form implantable optoelectrochemical probes for real-time optogenetic stimulation and dopamine detection capabilities. A customized, lightweight circuit module is employed for untethered, remote signal control, and data acquisition. After the probe is injected into the ventral tegmental area (VTA) of freely behaving mice, in vivo experiments clearly demonstrate the utilities of the multifunctional optoelectrochemical microprobe system for optogenetic interference of place preferences and detection of dopamine release. The presented options for material and device integrations provide a practical route to simultaneous optical control and electrochemical sensing of complex nervous systems.

 

In this paper, we develop a wireless thin-film-based implantable microprobe system for optogenetic stimulation and electrochemical sensing of dopamine in the animal deep brain. A thin-film, microscale light-emitting diode (micro-LED) transferred on a flexible substrate is employed as a light source for optogenetic stimulation. A poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) polystyrene sulfonate (PEDOT:PSS)-coated diamond film is placed on the micro-LED, serving as an electrochemical sensor for dopamine detection. As an optically transparent, electrically insulating and thermally conductive interlayer in the stacked device structure, the diamond film separates the micro-LED and the PEDOT:PSS sensor, ensuring simultaneous optical stimulation and electrochemical detection in the same region. For wireless control and signal acquisition, the formed thin-film and flexible microprobe is interfaced with a miniaturized, removable circuit module powered by a rechargeable battery. Implanted into the ventral tegmental area (VTA) of freely behaving mice, the fully integrated optoelectrochemical microprobe is demonstrated to remotely control animal behaviors and dopamine signal recording.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41378-020-0176-9

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/3/2024 at 8:51 PM, Macnamara said:

Rishi Sunak refuses to say if he will profit from Moderna Covid vaccine

Tue 17 Nov 2020 08.39 EST
The chancellor, Rishi Sunak, has refused to disclose whether he will profit from a surge in the share price of the Covid-19 vaccine manufacturer Moderna, one of the biggest investments held by the hedge fund he co-founded before entering parliament.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/nov/17/rishi-sunak-refuses-to-say-if-he-will-profit-from-moderna-covid-vaccine

What is Infosys? Who owns the Indian IT giant? How is it linked to the Prime Minister? And why does Rishi Sunak's wife Akshata Murty earn millions from it?

  • The PM's wife Akshata Murty owns almost 39 million shares in her father's firm

By Greg Heffer, Political Correspondent For Mailonline

Published: 12:10 EST, 25 April 2023 | Updated: 12:27 EST, 25 April 2023 

Rishi Sunak is continuing to face scrutiny over his family's financial affairs following a recent row over his wife's investments.

The Prime Minister is being investigated by a parliamentary watchdog over his failure to declare Akshata Murty's shareholding in a childcare business.

This is among a number of shareholdings Ms Murty holds both directly and through her venture capital investment company, Catamaran Ventures UK.

But the bulk of her wealth most likely comes from her shares in Infosys, the Indian IT giant.

What is Infosys?

Infosys is a global technology company headquartered in Bangalore.

It is India's second-largest IT services exporter and is estimated to be worth $62billion (£50billion).

According to the company's website, it is 'a global leader in next-generation digital services and consulting' and works across more than 50 countries.

Does Infosys have any Government contracts?

According to the Government's 'Contracts Finder' website, Infosys has been granted public sector contracts worth more than £172million since 2015.

The latest was a £1.76m contract with Transport for London, which began in January this year.

The largest public sector contract held by Infosys was a £95m deal with Transport for London between 2015 to 2017 for an 'IT Solutions Framework'.

The 'Contracts Finder' website does not list any Infosys contracts with either the Cabinet Office or the Treasury - the two Whitehall departments Mr Sunak has headed during his time in Government.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12011923/What-Infosys-linked-Rishi-Sunak.html

Neil Oliver TEARS into 'unelected PUPPET' Rishi Sunak for 'GASLIGHTING' the British people

 

Infosys And The Office Of The Chief Scientist Of Israel Sign MoU To Drive Industrial Research And Development

Posted by Richard Willett - Memes and headline comments by David Icke Posted on 25 October 2023

Aimed at Enhancing an Innovation Ecosystem to Address Industry Challenges Faced by Clients

Infosys, a global leader in consulting and technology services, today announced that it has signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with The State of Israel, to establish and enhance cooperation in industrial research and development. This MoU is a part of the ‘Global Enterprise Collaboration Program’ developed by the Office of the Chief Scientist of Israel to accelerate innovation through a global ecosystem.

The MoU creates a framework for industrial cooperation between Infosys and Israeli corporations in the emerging technology areas of cloud, information security, sensors, analytics, and sustainability. With a strong global client base across industry segments and proven expertise in driving innovation-led growth for businesses, Infosys will bring valuable insights in defining pertinent challenges and solutions across various industries.

Infosys Labs, the research and innovation arm of Infosys, drives research across the ‘Building Tomorrow’s Enterprise’ mega trends that have the potential to transform client business. Committed to the principle of ‘Innovation Co-creation’, Infosys Labs strengthens its existing innovation ecosystem of clients, partners and industry consortia through this MoU.

Speaking on the occasion, Subu Goparaju, Senior Vice President and Head of Infosys Labs said, “This collaboration aligns with our vision to bring together different innovation networks from around the world and make them relevant to our clients. At Infosys, we are looking at leveraging the innovation ecosystem in Israel, as part of evaluating early stage technologies that are relevant for clients to build tomorrow’s enterprises.”

https://www.infosys.com/newsroom/press-releases/2012/mou-drive-industrial-research-development.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

going mainstream....the telegraph newspaper.....

Health Secretary urged to release data that ‘may link Covid vaccine to excess deaths’

MPs and peers criticise ‘wall of silence’ as Government blames waiting lists and pandemic backlog for increase

Camilla Turner, Chief Political Correspondent 2 March 2024 • 6:15pm
MPs and peers have accused the Health Secretary of withholding data that could link the Covid vaccine to excess deaths, and criticised a “wall of silence” on the topic...

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/03/02/health-secretary-release-data-covid-vaccine-excess-deaths/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/16/2024 at 7:22 PM, Macnamara said:

 

So by calling their israeli chemtrail company 'stardust solutions' the implication is that the particles they intend to release into the atmosphere are ground up diamonds because according to that piece i posted stardust is made of diamonds...

 

I haven't seen hard proof of that yet, only a piece i posted above, from 2015, in which scientists were discussing the idea that diamond dust could be sprayed as particles into the atmosphere

 

But if i'm right about what's going on then this should be a huge story yet i can't see anyone talking about the spraying of diamond dust, from planes, in the alt media scene. But if you look at that piece i posted above about the condition caused by inhaling diamond dust (eg people working in the diamond trade) then it causes all the symptoms that have been discussed in the covid era: blood clots, cardiovascular issues, respiratory issues

 

now they are starting to disclose the truth about the activity which for decades they have called people 'conspiracy theorists' for calling out:

Nasa plans to inject Earth's atmosphere with millions of tons ice to tackle climate change

Nasa's idea of injecting Earth's atmosphere with millions of tons of ice is known as "geoengineering"

By Web Desk
March 01, 2024

Nasa scientists have unveiled an audacious plan to counteract climate change by introducing ice particles into the sky.

The goal is to spray tons ice particles into the upper atmosphere from high-altitude aircraft that rises 58,000 feet above the ground, which is more than 20,000 feet higher than commercial aircraft, according to Daily Mail.

Nasa and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (Noaa) collaborated on the idea.

The concept of drying the upper atmosphere is the most recent addition to what some scientists are referring to as a last-ditch arsenal of strategies to combat climate change through altering the planet's seas or atmosphere.

Known as "geoengineering," it is frequently disapproved of due to possible adverse effects and is typically discussed in addition to emission reductions rather than as a substitute for lowering carbon pollution.

Lead author Joshua Schwarz, a physicist at Noaa, stated: "This isn´t something that we can even implement right now. This is about exploring what might be possible in the future and identifying research directions."

Schwarz pointed out that the efforts would only cool the atmosphere by 1/70th, or the same amount of warmth as CO2 provides, and would not counteract its effects. 

https://www.thenews.com.pk/latest/1163203-nasa-plans-to-inject-earths-atmosphere-with-millions-of-tons-ice-to-tackle-climate-change

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...