Macnamara Posted June 8 Author Share Posted June 8 On 6/5/2023 at 8:38 PM, Macnamara said: Disease X: Mark 2 In 2018 the pirate council made a thread on the old icke forum titled 'disease X' looking at the possibility of an incoming pandemic of some kind with various speculations as to what could cause it. That thread has been necro'd on this forum and is in the coronavirus subsection. In there is a clip of the ex royal navy microwaves expert barrie trower recounting a meeting he had with an insider who warned him that bacteria can be seeded somewhere that lies dormant until it is activated by certain microwave frequencies. Obviously one of the first things that comes to mind is the possibility of 'chemtrails' being used to seed the bacteria as a form of biowarfare. Searches found a study showing that Epstein-Barr can be activated by microwaves and i have mentioned that earlier in this thread. A clip the Icke's shared on their headlines page of the recently deceased Dr Buttar who said he had been poisoned showed Buttar saying that he had been told the covid jabs contained three dormant viruses that could be activated by 5G microwaves. He didn't know what viruses but he thought one was Marburg. This is basically the 'kill switch' theory that i've previously spoken about because I just can't shake that story told by barrie trower years before the whole covid thing even started. If such a nightmare scenario were actually true the timing for it would be best for after the WHO gets nation states to sign the global pandemic treaty because then once the viruses were activated in the jabbed populace they could use their new powers to impose a global lockdown and a suspension of democracy. I think they intend to have that signed by 2025. If dormant viruses were activated in the jabbed then unlike the covid psuedo-pandemic there WOULD actually be people dropping dead in front of you and in the street. The normies who took the jabs would never, in a million years make the leap to seeing that the viruses were dormant viruses activated within them and they would simply believe that there was a real pandemic and they would comply with every single dictat of the state. The dissenters meanwhile would not have a leg to stand on as they tried to dispel fears of a fake-pandemic because this time the deaths would be real and highly visible so even they would likely believe the government narrative of a deadly ad highly contagious disease spreading across the world. I don't know if those within who the viruses were activated would then be contagious to the unjabbed.....it's all such a horrific scenario that I sincerely hope Dr Buttar is mistaken about that. Certainly the elites have been building bunkers and that would be one way to wait out the pandemic as it spread across the surface of the planet before burning itself out. Either way the signing of the global pandemic treaty is being foisted upon national governments by the WHO for some reason: clearly the globalist cabal intend to use those powers for SOMETHING. Quite a long article but with some interesting info and clips: Marburg – Genocide or Nothingburger? “Prepare for a Disease Deadlier than Covid” By Mike Whitney Global Research, June 07, 2023 Something to consider; If the vaxxxed start dropping in winter, the symptoms would be very similar to the Marburg virus. You could very easily blame this wave of death on this rare, ebola-like virus, fooling people into not blaming the vaxxx itself.” Rosie’s Tactical Sandbag @DarnelSugarfoo Marburg is a hemorrhagic fever that kills the majority of the people it infects. Fortunately, no one in the United States has ever died from Marburg nor has any American ever been infected by the disease. The reason for this is not hard to understand. The virus is native to Africa and is transmitted to humans via monkeys and bats that live in that area. In other words, there is no evidence that Americans are at risk of contracting or dying from Marburg. Nevertheless, in December 2020, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued a “Notice of Declaration” in which they stated the following: The recurrent but unpredictable and variable nature of Marburg disease outbreaks and the transmission profile makes marburgviruses a threat to the public health security of the American people, requiring vigilance and a continuing need for development of medical countermeasures. Similar to determinations and experiences with Ebola virus outbreaks, marburgvirus has been determined to have the potential to be a threat to US public health security.” Notice of Declaration This is just wrong. There’s no evidence that Americans are at risk of contracting or dying from Marburg. There have been no outbreaks in the US and no proof there will be any in the future. So, why would HHS deceive the public on a matter of such importance? That’s the question? In order to figure out why HHS issued its “Declaration”, we need to look at the declaration itself which is available at the Federal Register under the title “Notice of Declaration Under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act for Countermeasures Against Marburgvirus and/or Marburg Disease.” The document is quite long and written in a type of legal language that many may find hard to read. Still, we think it is worth the time and effort. What you will discover is that HHS has created the legal and contractual infrastructure needed for the production of more experimental vaccines. That’s what this is all about. HHS has made unsupportable claims about Marburg in order to fabricate a public health crisis that will serve as a green-light for more vaccines. As always, the implementing of agenda-driven policies requires a fair-amount of fearmongering which is certainly the case here. Here’s more from the Notice of Declaration: Marburg disease is a highly virulent disease that causes hemorrhagic fever, with a case fatality rate of approximately 88 percent. Humans can become infected with marburgviruses, but it is largely unknown how marburgvirus transmits from its animal host to humans…. After the initial crossover of the virus from host animal to humans, transmission can occur through person-to-person contact. This may happen in several ways: Direct contact to droplets of body fluids from infected persons, or contact with equipment and other objects contaminated with infectious blood or tissues. The virus can spread between humans in close environments and through direct contact.’ Notice of Declaration On the issue of “transmission”: It would be interesting to know how many people believe that Marburg was transmitted from animal-to-humans (as stated above) or assume that these oddball pathogens actually originated at one of Uncle Sam’s 300-or-so bioweapons labs around the world? Here’s more from the Declaration: Declaration for Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act Coverage for Countermeasures Against Marburgvirus and/or Marburg Disease I have determined that Marburg disease and marburgviruses are a credible risk such that Marburg disease or marburgviruses may in the future constitute a public health emergency….. I have considered the desirability of encouraging the design, development, clinical testing, or investigation, manufacture, labeling, distribution, formulation, packaging, marketing, promotion, sale, purchase, donation, dispensing, prescribing, administration, licensing, and use of the Covered Countermeasures. I recommend, under the conditions stated in this Declaration, the manufacture, testing, development, distribution, administration, and use of the Covered Countermeasures”. Notice of Declaration Can you see how wrong this is? so he can hand billions of dollars to his friends at big pharma. But the fact is, Marburg is not a credible public health threat at all, not even close. How can you announce a public health emergency when no one has contracted the disease? It’s ridiculous. So, why is the Secretary doing this? It’s obvious that government lawyers have spent a great deal of time and energy creating the legal and contractual framework for this operation, but why? What is the objective? The objective is hidden in the above quote: “I have considered the desirability of encouraging the… development… of Covered Countermeasures.” Those “countermeasures” are in fact vaccines. The HHS Secretary is calling for another round of experimental vaccines to respond to a pandemic that has not yet materialized. And –given that three years have passed since HHS’s original declaration– we think it’s highly-probable that a Marburg vaccine has already been developed and stockpiled in some remote storage facility owned by big pharma. We can’t verify that but –judging from past experience– we think that is more than likely. Here another quote from the text that underscores the point we are trying to make: Covered Countermeasures are any antiviral, any other drug, any biologic, any diagnostic, any other device, or any vaccine, used to treat, diagnose, cure, prevent, or mitigate Marburg disease...” Notice of Declaration There it is in black and white: Vaccines. This has nothing to do with a fake Marburg pandemic. HHS is laying the groundwork for another round of injections. And, from the looks of it, they may be very close to achieving their goal. Check it out: Marburg Vaccine Development A newly published paper in The Lancet shows that an experimental vaccine against Marburg virus (MARV) was safe and induced an immune response in a small, first-in-human clinical trial.The vaccine, developed by researchers at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), part of the National Institutes of Health, could someday be an important tool to respond to Marburg virus outbreaks…. The investigational vaccine appeared to induce strong, long-lasting immunity to the MARV glycoprotein: 95% of participants in the trial exhibited a robust antibody response after vaccination, and 70% maintained that response for more than 48 weeks. …If additional data supports the promising results seen in the Phase 1 trial, the cAd3-Marburg virus vaccine could someday be used in emergency responses to MARV outbreaks.” Marburg vaccine shows promising results in first-in-human study“, National Institute of Health Well, that didn’t take long, did it? A little tweaking here-and-there and– Presto– we have a new vaccine. Are you surprised? You shouldn’t be. Unfortunately, any progress in R&D needs to be tempered with a healthy dose of reality, such as, any public health emergency would, once again, preclude proper testing, clinical trials and traditional regulatory oversight. We can be dead-certain of that. We can also be sure that any new regime of experimental vaccines will be forced on the public whether they want them or not. Also, the abuse of the Emergency Use Authorization (EAU) ensures that from-this-point-on the ingesting of new medications will be a crapshoot at best. Don’t expect any guarantees of safety, because there won’t be any. Did you know that researchers have already invented a PCR test for Marburg? It’s true. This is from the CDC website updated on April 19, 2023: “Antigen-capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) testing, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and IgM-capture ELISA can be used to confirm a case of MVD within a few days of symptom onset…. The IgG-capture ELISA is appropriate for testing persons later in the course of disease or after recovery. In deceased patients, immunohistochemistry, virus isolation, or PCR of blood or tissue specimens may be used to diagnose MVD retrospectively.” (CDC Website) So, a PCR test was developed at great expense for a disease that has only killed a handful of people globally and for which there is no immediate, pressing need. Does that make sense to you? Did you know any of this? Did you know that HHS had designated a rare, hemorrhagic fever named Marburg, as a “public health emergency” requiring vast resources for the development of countermeasures? Did you know all these legal and operational conditions were put into place 3 years ago in 2020? Did you know HHS has provided blanket immunity to drug companies for the manufacturing of experimental vaccines for diseases that have not yet infected even one American? Did you know that vaccine development for the Marburg virus is well under way and that a PCR test has already been invented? This is all very weird, and there’s more, too, like this bizarre response from Bill Gates about the prospect of another pandemic. Check it out: Bill Gates: "We’ll have to prepare for the next one. That, I’d say will get attention this time" https://rumble.com/v15s7rh-bill-gates-well-have-to-prepare-for-the-next-one.-that-id-say-will-get-atte.html Why is Bill Gates so confident there’s going to be another pandemic, and why the smirk? Does Gates know something we don’t know? And why –on April 22, 2021– did Gates’ GAVI Alliance post an article titled “The Next Pandemic: Marburg?” Did Gates know that just four months after the article was published, a Marburg outbreak would take place in Equatorial Guinea (35 fatalities) followed shortly after by an outbreak in Tanzania? (6 fatalities) That’s quite a coincidence, don’t you think? the rest of the article is viewable here: https://www.globalresearch.ca/marburg-genocide-or-nothingburger/5821537 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted June 8 Author Share Posted June 8 Video Emerges of BlackRock CEO Gloating about Using ‘Woke’ Ideology to ‘Force Behaviors’ of Public Frank Bergman June 7, 2023 A video has emerged that shows BlackRock’s chairman and CEO Larry Fink gloating to an audience about his plans to infiltrate society, via corporate America, with “woke” ideologies to “force behaviors” of the public. Fink, a member of the globalist World Economic Forum (WEF), is a leading advocate of the radical Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) scores movement. ESG is a set of far-left criteria that pressures companies to become more “woke” to meet the standards. As Slay News reported in January, Twitter boss Elon Musk famously blasted ESGs by remarking that the “S in ESG stands for Satanic.” The S in ESG stands for Satanic — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) January 16, 2023 According to SG Analytics: These scores, which range from 0-100, allow investors to compare a company’s performance to that of its competitors in the same industry and businesses from different sectors. Poor performance is defined as a score of less than 50 and excellent performance as a score of more than 70. The scores have become increasingly important in corporate America as stakeholders and potential investors look at them to evaluate a company for “diversity,” “equity,” “carbon footprint,” and radical left-wing ideology. Unfortunately, corporate elites like Fink are taking advantage of ESG’s importance by adding in even more progressive categories such as “social vulnerability,” “disadvantaged or priority populations,” and “board of Directors’ diversity,” just to name a few. A newly resurfaced clip from November 9, 2017, shows Fink laying out his plans for ESGs and gloating about how his company is “forcing behaviors” of the public with radical ideology, before “woke” had even been heard of. “Well behaviors are going to have to change…you have to force behaviors and at BlackRock, we are forcing behaviors,” Fink declared. He continued by boasting about how he is forcing increased diversity rates at BlackRock, regardless of competency or merit. “What we’re doing internally is, if you don’t achieve these levels of ‘impact’, your compensation could be impacted,” Fink added. Kenneth Chenault, who was the CEO and chairman of American Express, quickly interjected, “We’re doing the same thing.” Fink continued, “You have to force behaviors and if you don’t force behaviors, whether it’s gender, or race, or any way you want to say, ‘the composition of your team,’ you’re going to be impacted.” “We’re going to have to force change,” Fink concluded. Why has everything gone woke these days? ESG scores. Here is BlackRock CEO Larry Fink along with the CEO of AmEx explaining his desire to “force behaviors” (2017): pic.twitter.com/wCoeoJBD8x — End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) June 4, 2023 https://slaynews.com/news/video-blackrock-ceo-gloating-woke-ideology-force-behaviors-public/?utm_source=mailpoet 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted June 9 Author Share Posted June 9 (edited) Video: Pfizer’s “Secret” Report on the Covid Vaccine. Beyond Manslaughter. The Evidence is Overwhelming. The Vaccine Should Be Immediately Withdrawn Worldwide By Prof Michel Chossudovsky Global Research, June 05, 2023 The following video interview with Prof. Michel Chossudovsky pertains to the Confidential Pfizer Report released as part of a Freedom of Information (FOI) procedure. The report is a bombshell. The vaccine was launched in mid-December 2020. By the end of February 2021, “Pfizer had already received more than 1,200 reports of deaths allegedly caused by the vaccine and tens of thousands of reported adverse events, including 23 cases of spontaneous abortions out of 270 pregnancies and more than 2,000 reports of cardiac disorders.” see video here: https://www.globalresearch.ca/video-pfizers-secret-report-on-the-covid-vaccine-beyond-manslaughter-the-evidence-is-overwhelming-the-vaccine-should-be-immediately-withdrawn-worldwide/5780561 A clear attack on women's fertility: Dr. Naomi Wolf Uncovers Pfizer’s Depopulation Agenda, as Evidenced by Its Own Documents https://rumble.com/v2rdz9s-dr.-naomi-wolf-uncovers-pfizers-depopulation-agenda-as-evidenced-by-its-own.html Edited June 9 by Macnamara 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted June 9 Author Share Posted June 9 Tucker Talks Taboos After MSM Ignores Instagram Kiddie-Porn Bombshell by Tyler Durden Friday, Jun 09, 2023 - 12:44 PM After his first episode topped 100 million views, Tucker Carlson is back with Episode 2, exploring how we, as a population, are controlled (or coerced) directly (through laws) or indirectly (through taboos). Carlson observes the changing societal taboos in America, suggesting that they are being dictated from above rather than evolving organically, focusing explicitly on the shift in attitudes towards race-based attacks, adultery in politics, and child molestation. "Let's say you wanted to control a country," the former Fox News man begins rather joltingly. "Well," he explains "you'd want to make sure you had the complete obedience of everybody within your borders who was authorized to use deadly force... you'd start with the military... [and other agencies] like the IRS." "Controlling the guns would be a top priority for you if ever wanted to go dictatorial." But, Carlson, asks, what if you wanted more, not simply to control people's behavior, "but to control how they think." "In that case," he remarks, "you'd need to take charge of its taboos." A taboo is something that by popular consensus is not allowed, it is not illegal, but it doesn't need to be. "Over time, social prohibitions are more powerful and more enduring than laws." Until fairly recently, Tucker points out that it was taboo in this country to attack people on the basis of their race, but he notes "apparently we no longer believe that - punishing people on the basis of their skin color is not only permitted in modern America, it is mandatory... as long as the victims are white." Carlson questions the definition and scope of white supremacy as described by President Joe Biden... Which brings Carlson to this week's horrific WSJ expose of Instagram's kiddie-porn rings which he notes has resulted in exactly nothing as "one of the largest circulation newspapers in the world reported that one of the world's most influential companies was promoting pedophilia and nobody in power did anything about it." BREAKING: Instagram algorithm exposed promoting pedophile networks in massive investigation, video sales, ‘preteensex’ menus, in-person meetups with underage boys and girls, using emojis such as a map and cheese pizza - WSJ — Jack Poso (@JackPosobiec) June 7, 2023 As Carlson notes, "The people who run this country no longer see child molesters as the worst among us" He expresses concerns about the blurred lines of crime, the erosion of defined legal codes, and the need to protect societal taboos as guiding moral principles. In fact, he continues, "what we are allowed to dislike is being dictated to us from above, sometimes by force." The trick, that has happened slowly and then all at one, is that "when a crime has no definition, anyone can be guilty of it" "Don't let them rationalize away your intuitive moral sense." "Cling to your taboos like you life depends on them... because it does." Watch the full Tucker On Twitter episode below: Ep. 2 Cling to your taboos! pic.twitter.com/45AeVdtwOu — Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) June 8, 2023 https://www.zerohedge.com/political/tucker-talks-taboos-after-msm-ignores-instagram-kiddie-porn-bombshell 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted June 10 Author Share Posted June 10 On 6/7/2023 at 7:22 PM, Macnamara said: another wildfire this time in canada... That clip in the post i quoted above says that the military looked into the idea of using wildfires as a way to fill the atmosphere with particulates to block out the sun which causes temporary cooling but in the long run causes warming. It's certainly interesting that the fires are moving around the usual suspects (eg the 5 eyes countries plus some EU countries). Certainly antifa members have been caught lighting fires in the past. this video shows houses have been destroyed but not the flammable trees next to them. This would suggest a move to push the people off the land which ties into the agenda to get people into smart cities. To do this would need some sort of directed energy weapon like a laser.....sound crazy? watch the video see what you think LOOKING FOR CLUES in the CANADIAN FIRES Robert Brame is a forensic arborist who has analyzed 38 California fires and has come up with hundreds of photographic evidence of IMPOSSIBLE normal fire behavior. Let's use this information to help us look for CLUES in the CANADIAN fires to see if the same anamolies exist. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted June 10 Author Share Posted June 10 (edited) I've posted the great work of some good jewish people like prof Fenton and naomi wolf but now lets look at the innovations of the dark, heretical sabbatean-jews: Henry Kissinger- creator of the World Economic Forum Jonas Salk- creator of the inactivated polio vaccine that was contaminated with SV40 Frederick Lindemann- creator of the carpet bombing of cities Albert Bourla- creator of the pfizer covid mRNA jab Julius Oppenheimer- creator of the nuclear bomb Bernhard Baruch- creator of the american war machine and co-conspirer for the creation of the league of nations and the wall street crash. He advocated for the dropping of the nuclear bomb on japan and then advocated for all nuclear weapons to be put under the control of the newly created United Nations Louis Feiser- creator of military napalm David Rockefeller- creator of the Trilateral Commission, the Club of Rome and chairman of the council on foreign relations Edward Bernays- creator of public relations (adverts) Karl Marx- creator of communism The rothschilds, the sassoons and the kadoories: controllers of the opium trade The Fuggers- controllers of the slave trade from africa to america Victoria Nuland created the Ukraine conflict Leo Strauss- mentor of the neo-cons Michael Chertoff- creator of the TSA microwave machines in airports and the 'patriot' act rammed down americans throats after 911 Paul Bremer- creator of the iraqi insurgency Edited June 10 by Macnamara 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted June 11 Author Share Posted June 11 On 6/9/2023 at 8:49 PM, Macnamara said: A clear attack on women's fertility: Dr. Naomi Wolf Uncovers Pfizer’s Depopulation Agenda, as Evidenced by Its Own Documents https://rumble.com/v2rdz9s-dr.-naomi-wolf-uncovers-pfizers-depopulation-agenda-as-evidenced-by-its-own.html 1992 WHO report on ‘fertility regulating vaccines’ https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/61301/WHO_HRP_WHO_93.1.pdf 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted June 11 Author Share Posted June 11 23 hours ago, Macnamara said: I've posted the great work of some good jewish people like prof Fenton and naomi wolf but now lets look at the innovations of the dark, heretical sabbatean-jews: Henry Kissinger- creator of the World Economic Forum Jonas Salk- creator of the inactivated polio vaccine that was contaminated with SV40 Frederick Lindemann- creator of the carpet bombing of cities Albert Bourla- creator of the pfizer covid mRNA jab Julius Oppenheimer- creator of the nuclear bomb Bernhard Baruch- creator of the american war machine and co-conspirer for the creation of the league of nations and the wall street crash. He advocated for the dropping of the nuclear bomb on japan and then advocated for all nuclear weapons to be put under the control of the newly created United Nations Louis Feiser- creator of military napalm David Rockefeller- creator of the Trilateral Commission, the Club of Rome and chairman of the council on foreign relations Edward Bernays- creator of public relations (adverts) Karl Marx- creator of communism The rothschilds, the sassoons and the kadoories: controllers of the opium trade The Fuggers- controllers of the slave trade from africa to america Victoria Nuland created the Ukraine conflict Leo Strauss- mentor of the neo-cons Michael Chertoff- creator of the TSA microwave machines in airports and the 'patriot' act rammed down americans throats after 911 Paul Bremer- creator of the iraqi insurgency The Trilateral Commission Members Driving Censorship Campaigns Posted By: Andrew Lowenthal via Brownstone Institute June 8, 2023 When the Atlantic Council “takes up the censorship sword”, you know that it is an official policy of the Trilateral Commission. Why? Because the Board of Directors and the Board of Advisors are riddled with TC members like Henry Kissinger, Joseph Nye, Michael Chertoff, Paula Dobriansky, and others. The Atlantic Council has been dominated by the Trilateral Commission since its founding in 1973. ⁃ TN Editor https://www.technocracy.news/the-trilateral-commission-members-driving-censorship-campaigns/ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted June 14 Author Share Posted June 14 welcome aboard John... International excess deaths Why aren't the BBC covering this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted June 14 Author Share Posted June 14 Neil Oliver: Whatever happened to government BY the people OF the people & FOR the people? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted June 14 Author Share Posted June 14 On 6/10/2023 at 9:03 PM, Macnamara said: I've posted the great work of some good jewish people like prof Fenton and naomi wolf but now lets look at the innovations of the dark, heretical sabbatean-jews: Jonas Salk- creator of the inactivated polio vaccine that was contaminated with SV40 Simian Virus 40 (SV40): A Cancer Causing Monkey Virus from FDA-Approved Vaccines Michael E. Horwin, M.A., J.D.* This article was originally published in the Albany Law Journal of Science & Technology, Volume 13, Number 3, 2003 The Creation and Production of the Polio Vaccines read piece here: https://www.sv40foundation.org/cpv-link/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted June 14 Author Share Posted June 14 Bill Gates may get one-on-one meeting with China’s Xi Jinping, sources say By Reuters June 14, 2023 Bill Gates, Microsoft’s co-founder, is set to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping on Friday during his visit to China, two people with knowledge of the matter said. The meeting will mark Xi’s first meeting with a foreign private entrepreneur in recent years. https://nypost.com/2023/06/14/bill-gates-in-china-to-meet-president-xi-jinping-report/ 300 Million Jobs Will Be Lost, Degraded By Artificial Intelligence, Report Says Wednesday, 14 June 2023 Artificial intelligence (AI) might be all fun and games now, but the coming effects will be devastating, one top investment bank says. Goldman Sachs estimates that 300 million jobs could be lost or diminished by the technology as automation renders human workers unnecessary. Meanwhile, Microsoft cofounder Bill Gates has warned that AI could take over search engines like Google if, as predicted, the behaviors of users online change dramatically with the advent of the new technology. “Whoever wins the personal agent, that’s the big thing, because you will never go to a search site again, you will never go to a productivity site, you’ll never go to Amazon again,” Gates said during a Goldman Sachs event on AI in San Francisco last month, as quoted by CNBC. AI assistants, for instance, could “read the stuff you don’t have time to read,” Gates said. That means users could get information without using Google search. Microsoft moved quickly to get on top of AI, but Gates said there is a 50-50 chance that who comes out on top will be either a startup or a tech giant. “I’d be disappointed if Microsoft didn’t come in there,” Gates said. http://www.domigood.com/2023/06/300-million-jobs-will-be-lost-degraded.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted June 15 Author Share Posted June 15 14 hours ago, Macnamara said: welcome aboard John... International excess deaths Why aren't the BBC covering this? ok John so the subtext of what you are saying is that in the countries where there were covid jab roll outs there are now people of all ages dying of liver and heart failure in excess of usual expected mortality rates.... This is leading you to be frustrated and exasperated that the wider world including the medical world and the mass media are not even acknowledging let alone exploring the excess deaths. None of this is a surprise to me as i've been onto this agenda for a longtime now and i'd like to run something else by you that has been frustrating and exasperating me for many years prior to the covid scamdemic In the same way you are looking at these uptick in deaths and health problems as possibly caused by the covid 'vaccines' i would like you to now expand your view to consider if the change in autism rates from 1 in 10,000 children 40 years ago to 1 in 40 today (and rising) is caused by another environmental factor that existed prior to the covid mRNA jabs.... I want you to consider that prior to the catastrophe of excess deaths following the covid 'vaccines' there was already a silent catastrophe unfolding in the form of autism (neurological problems) in the young. I suggest that there may be a number of factors at play regarding that and that those factors may even work synergistically for example there may be environmental factors such a glyphosate that weaken the gut barrier or microwaves that can weaken the blood brain barrier and that certain ingredients in regular vaccines such as thimerosol and aluminium may then be passing over the blood brain barrier and causing autism and an uptick in auto immune disorders and that it needs urgent investigation before autism rates reach 1 in every 1 child: The crime of the century https://rumble.com/v16y1np-the-crime-of-the-century.html 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted June 16 Author Share Posted June 16 (edited) On 6/14/2023 at 6:34 PM, Macnamara said: welcome aboard John... International excess deaths Why aren't the BBC covering this? That 'deafening silence' you are hearing there John is the sound of COWARDICE. That's what cowardice sounds like. To pretend to themselves that they aren't cowards for not speaking out and or asking any questions they will instead attack you and imply that you are a crazy 'tinfoil hat wearer' etc for being the one to speak up. By implying that you are crazy it lets them off the hook as it implies they are right and you are wrong and therefore its not that they are cowards and refusing to face reality, its that you are crazy and delusional for even suggesting that something might be amiss. But tell me: is it crazy to talk about this stuff or is it crazy not to? Edited June 16 by Macnamara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted June 16 Author Share Posted June 16 RFK talking about vaccine-autism link on the joe rogan podcast which has an 11 million viewership: 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted June 17 Author Share Posted June 17 (edited) Forms of interpretation: 16 Types of Literary Criticism What Is the Importance of Literary Theory? Literary theory enables a broad appreciation of global literature. Reading a text through the lens of literary theory provides a new perspective to better understand literature, learn more about different authors' intentions, and generally improve the quality of literature for both authors and readers. Literary theory can also influence literature, challenging texts to evolve into new territory. 15 Types of Literary Criticism There are many different schools of theory that give readers a special vocabulary to dissect any given literary text. Here are some of the most significant theories: 1. Practical criticism: This study of literature encourages readers to examine the text without regarding any of the outside context—like the author, the date and place of writing, or any other contextual information that may enlighten the reader. 2. Cultural studies: In direct opposition to practical criticism, cultural theory examines a text within the context of its socio-cultural environment. Cultural critics believe a text should be read entirely through the lens of the text's cultural context. 3. Formalism: Formalism compels readers to judge the artistic merit of literature by examining its formal elements, like language and technical skill. Formalism favors a literary canon of works that exemplify the highest standards of literature, as determined by formalist critics. 4. Reader-response: Reader-response criticism is rooted in the belief that a reader's reaction to or interpretation of a text is as valuable a source of critical study as the text itself. 5. The new criticism: New critics focused on examining the formal and structural elements of literature, as opposed to the emotional or moral elements. Poet T.S. Eliot and critics Cleanth Brooks and John Crowe Ransom pioneered the school of the new criticism. 6. Psychoanalytic criticism: Using Sigmund Freud’s principles of psychoanalysis—like dream interpretation—psychoanalytic criticism looks to the neuroses and psychological states of characters in literature to interpret a text's meaning. Other notable psychoanalytic critics include Jacques Lacan and Julia Kristeva. 7. Marxist theory: Socialist thinker Karl Marx established this branch of literary theory alongside Marxism, his political and sociological ideology. Marxist theory examines literature along the lines of class relations and socialist ideals. 8. Post-modernism: Post-modernist literary criticism emerged in the middle of the twentieth century to reflect the fractured and dissonant experience of twentieth-century life. While there are many competing definitions of postmodernism, it is most commonly understood as rejecting modernist ideas of unified narrative. 9. Post-structuralism: Post-structuralist literary theory abandoned ideas of formal and structural cohesion, questioning any assumed “universal truths” as reliant on the social structure that influenced them. One of the writers who shaped post-structuralist theory is, Roland Barthes—the father of semiotics, or the study of signs and symbols in art. 10. Deconstruction: Proposed by Jacques Derrida, deconstructionists pick apart a text’s ideas or arguments, looking for contradictions that render any singular reading of a text impossible. 11. Postcolonial theory: Postcolonial theory challenges the dominance of Western thought in literature, examining the impacts of colonialism in critical theory. Edward Said's book Orientalism is a foundational text of postcolonial theory. 12. Feminist criticism: As the feminist movement gained steam in the mid-twentieth century, literary critics began looking to gender studies for new modes of literary criticism. One of the earliest proponents of feminist criticism was Virginia Woolf in her seminal essay “A Room of One's Own.” Other notable feminist critics include Elaine Showalter and Hélène Cixous. 13. Queer theory: Queer theory followed feminist theory by further interrogating gender roles in literary studies, particularly through the lens of sexual orientation and gender identity. 14. Critical race theory: Critical race theory emerged during the civil rights movement in the United States. It is primarily concerned with examining the law, criminal justice, and cultural texts through the lens of race. Some leading critics of CRT include Kimberlé Crenshaw and Derrick Bell. 15. Critical disability theory: Critical disability theory is one of a growing number of intersectional fields of critical study. Critical disability theorists believe racist and ableist views go hand-in-hand and seek to examine ableist societal structures. https://www.masterclass.com/articles/literary-theory-explained 16. Conspiracy theory: a growing field of critical study that perceives events in the world not as random coincidences but rather as occurring through design Edited June 17 by Macnamara 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted June 17 Author Share Posted June 17 On 9/30/2020 at 5:15 PM, Macnamara said: Pirate Articles 1. To live free or die trying. Turn your life into a living protest or as Cap'n Icke might say 'be the aberration' 2. To wage war against deceit. 'True ignorance is not the absence of knowledge but the refusal to acquire it' 3. To push back against the forces of centralisation using creative imagination to seek health and fulfilment for yourself and others 4. To pay back to the spirit of man 5. Struggle for the dignity of the human spirit 6. Vote with your feet to be the change you want to see in the world 7. Cultivate heart-power, turn your back on the hype and value real things 8. Adversity is your whetstone and pain your teacher 9. To succeed through the sweat off our brow, the strength of our backs and the courage in our hearts (yes i did poach that last one from 'pirates of the caribbean' and what of it? **squints menacingly**) pirate article no 10: you can't help people who don't want to be helped Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted June 17 Author Share Posted June 17 On 6/14/2023 at 9:53 PM, Macnamara said: Bill Gates may get one-on-one meeting with China’s Xi Jinping, sources say By Reuters June 14, 2023 Bill Gates, Microsoft’s co-founder, is set to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping on Friday during his visit to China, two people with knowledge of the matter said. The meeting will mark Xi’s first meeting with a foreign private entrepreneur in recent years. https://nypost.com/2023/06/14/bill-gates-in-china-to-meet-president-xi-jinping-report/ 300 Million Jobs Will Be Lost, Degraded By Artificial Intelligence, Report Says Wednesday, 14 June 2023 Artificial intelligence (AI) might be all fun and games now, but the coming effects will be devastating, one top investment bank says. Goldman Sachs estimates that 300 million jobs could be lost or diminished by the technology as automation renders human workers unnecessary. Meanwhile, Microsoft cofounder Bill Gates has warned that AI could take over search engines like Google if, as predicted, the behaviors of users online change dramatically with the advent of the new technology. “Whoever wins the personal agent, that’s the big thing, because you will never go to a search site again, you will never go to a productivity site, you’ll never go to Amazon again,” Gates said during a Goldman Sachs event on AI in San Francisco last month, as quoted by CNBC. AI assistants, for instance, could “read the stuff you don’t have time to read,” Gates said. That means users could get information without using Google search. Microsoft moved quickly to get on top of AI, but Gates said there is a 50-50 chance that who comes out on top will be either a startup or a tech giant. “I’d be disappointed if Microsoft didn’t come in there,” Gates said. http://www.domigood.com/2023/06/300-million-jobs-will-be-lost-degraded.html raising the demon: Dancing With The Devil: Open AI Boss Calls For Collaboration With China Posted By: Alana Mastrangelo via Breitbart June 16, 2023 Technocrats across the world have a naive affinity for each other, regardless of political system at the top. This is partly because Technocrats have no use for political systems, except for the extent that they can be used to further Technocrat goals. Like the U.S. government, China’s governors will grab any technology useful for warfare and try to capitalize on it. ⁃ TN Editor Sam Altman, the CEO of ChatGPT developer OpenAI, called for a collaboration between American and Chinese researchers to counter the risks of artificial intelligence (AI). “China has some of the best AI talent in the world. So I really hope Chinese AI researchers will make great contributions here,” Altman said Saturday at a conference in Beijing, according to a report by the Wall Street Journal. Counter-protesters hold up Chinese flags to oppose the protesters gathering in central London to attend a march organised by StandwithHK and D4HK in support of Pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong, on August 17, 2019. – Hong Kong’s pro-democracy movement faces a major test this weekend as it tries to muster another huge crowd following criticism over a recent violent airport protest and as concerns mount over Beijing’s next move. (Photo by Isabel Infantes / AFP) (Photo by ISABEL INFANTES/AFP via Getty Images) Chinese speakers at the conference reportedly came from top universities and companies, including the U.S.-blacklisted telecom company Huawei Technologies, search giant Baidu, and speech-recognition firm iFlytek. In 2019, the United States sanctioned iFlytek, saying it aided the Chinese Communist Party in the surveillance of ethnic Uyghurs and other Muslim minorities in China. Additionally, the U.S. imposed sanctions in China last year in an attempt to stop the hostile foreign country from accessing the most popular cutting-edge chips needed for AI development. Tech watchers and industry leaders have also warned that China is only two years behind U.S. development in generative AI. Meanwhile, the Chinese government has made developing AI a priority. The Chinese conference that Altman spoke at on Saturday has been hosted annually since 2019 by the Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence, which is a government-sponsored research nonprofit that is sometimes referred to as the OpenAI equivalent of China. Altman delivered the opening keynote for a session about AI safety and alignment, which drew laughter from audience members when he said, “Open-source could benefit AI safety,” the Wall Street Journal reported. Read full story here… https://www.technocracy.news/dancing-with-the-devil-open-ai-boss-calls-for-collaboration-with-china/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted June 17 Author Share Posted June 17 ‘Unavoidably Unsafe’: RFK Jr. Reveals the Untold Truth Why Vaccines Have Liability Protections https://vigilantfox.substack.com/p/unavoidably-unsafe-rfk-jr-reveals?utm_source=post-email-title Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted June 17 Author Share Posted June 17 On 6/10/2023 at 9:03 PM, Macnamara said: I've posted the great work of some good jewish people like prof Fenton and naomi wolf but now lets look at the innovations of the dark, heretical sabbatean-jews: Henry Kissinger- creator of the World Economic Forum Jonas Salk- creator of the inactivated polio vaccine that was contaminated with SV40 Frederick Lindemann- creator of the carpet bombing of cities Albert Bourla- creator of the pfizer covid mRNA jab Julius Oppenheimer- creator of the nuclear bomb Bernhard Baruch- creator of the american war machine and co-conspirer for the creation of the league of nations and the wall street crash. He advocated for the dropping of the nuclear bomb on japan and then advocated for all nuclear weapons to be put under the control of the newly created United Nations Louis Feiser- creator of military napalm David Rockefeller- creator of the Trilateral Commission, the Club of Rome and chairman of the council on foreign relations Edward Bernays- creator of public relations (adverts) Karl Marx- creator of communism The rothschilds, the sassoons and the kadoories: controllers of the opium trade The Fuggers- controllers of the slave trade from africa to america Victoria Nuland created the Ukraine conflict Leo Strauss- mentor of the neo-cons Michael Chertoff- creator of the TSA microwave machines in airports and the 'patriot' act rammed down americans throats after 911 Paul Bremer- creator of the iraqi insurgency DOMINIC SANDBROOK: How the man who invented the atom bomb was brought down by his obsession with his communist lover By Dominic Sandbrook Published: 23:51 BST, 16 June 2023 | Updated: 23:58 BST, 16 June 2023 The story of those ground-breaking nuclear bombs, which were dropped a few weeks later on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, is well known. But Oppenheimer’s life itself is an extraordinary story — the tale of a man who created the most devastating weapons in history, only to find himself publicly investigated and condemned as a tool of communism. . Robert Oppenheimer was born in New York on April 22, 1904, the son of a German Jewish businessman, Julius, and his wife Ella, a painter. Unlike many immigrant families, the Oppenheimers were rich. Robert grew up in a house with a Picasso, a Rembrandt, a Renoir and three Van Goghs, and learned to sail at their summer house on Long Island. A brilliant scholar, he won a place at Harvard to study chemistry, though he soon discovered that his real passion was physics. He was, however, a very intense young man, whose peers found him rather unsettling. When he crossed the Atlantic to study for a postgraduate degree at Cambridge, he behaved in a very peculiar manner. First, having fallen out with his tutor Patrick Blackett, he poisoned an apple with chemicals from the laboratory and left it on his desk. (Fortunately for them both, Blackett didn’t eat it.) Next, he endeavoured to force himself on a woman in a train before collapsing to the ground in floods of tears. On another occasion, when his friend Francis Fergusson announced that he had got engaged, Oppenheimer leaped on him with a trunk strap and tried to garotte him. You didn’t have to be an Einstein to work out that sexual frustration was driving him mad. Yet there was no arguing with his sheer brainpower. The mid-1920s saw dazzling breakthroughs in the new realm of quantum physics — the study of tiny subatomic particles, such as electrons, protons and neutrons. Oppenheimer was one of its most brilliant pioneers, publishing 16 papers in just three years. He secured a teaching job at the University of California, Berkeley — but then found a new passion: politics. Like so many unworldly academics, he had vaguely Left-wing, even radical sympathies. Then, in 1936, he at last met a girl — the 22-year-old Jean Tatlock, a literature professor’s daughter and a keen member of the Communist Party. Tatlock called herself a ‘complete Red’, and under her influence Oppenheimer swung farther to the Left. The couple were regular guests at salons of Californian radicals, where Oppenheimer often handed over donations for the cause. Yet even as Oppenheimer got down to work, he made two mistakes that were to have catastrophic personal consequences. First, he was still in touch with his Left-wing friends back in California. Indeed, at some point in early 1943, he was approached by one old associate, communist literature professor Haakon Chevalier, to see if he was interested in passing nuclear secrets to the Soviet Union. Oppenheimer said no. Disastrously, though, he didn’t immediately report the conversation to the authorities, which was to have devastating repercussions when the FBI found out about it. Second, despite the fact that he was now married to a former biology student, Kitty Puening, and had two children, Peter and Toni, he had rekindled his affair with Tatlock. All the time the FBI were tapping his phone and reading his mail, which meant they knew he was sleeping with a communist again. On August 6, 1945, news reached Los Alamos that a U.S. bomber, Enola Gay, had dropped the world’s first atom bomb on the city of Hiroshima. At least 100,000 people had been killed, and countless thousands more horrifically injured. That night, as his team gathered in the town’s auditorium, Oppenheimer seemed jubilant, entering like a boxing champion, clasping his hands and pumping them above his head in triumph. But as the days passed and the reality sank in, many of the Los Alamos team began to have doubts. One scientist’s wife talked of their feeling of ‘revulsion . . . an intensely personal experience of the reality of evil’. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12204749/DOMINIC-SANDBROOK-man-invented-atom-bomb-brought-down.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted June 20 Author Share Posted June 20 If Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism, Then How Do You Explain All This Evidence? By Steve Kirsch Global Research, June 19, 2023 Steve Kirsch's newsletter 17 June 2023 Here’s my favorite short list of evidence that can’t be explained if vaccines don’t cause autism. Does anyone think I’m wrong and can explain the list? The list (in no particular order) Here is a list of some of the most compelling evidence I’ve run across. If there is a hypothesis that is a better fit to this evidence than vaccines cause autism, I’d love to hear it. Madsen study: Even in this heavily flawed study, the raw data showed a strongly elevated risk of autism. So they never showed the raw data odds ratio (did you know that the rate of autism was 45% higher in the vaccinated group than the unvaccinated group?) and the paper only showed the adjusted numbers! That’s unethical. You can read the flaws in this study that was widely cited to prove that there was no association here. Over 1,000 scientists didn’t see anything wrong with the study! It’s really stunning how easily bad science propagates into the mainstream. Note that this is the single best study that is cited to prove that vaccines don’t cause autism and it is deeply flawed. The authors wouldn’t provide the underlying data and refused to answer any questions. Is that the way science works? 214 papers in the peer-reviewed literature linking vaccines and autism: Autism mom Ginger Taylor compiled a list of 214 studies showing the link between vaccines and autism. Here’s the list as a single download. Wakefield 1998 paper: Wakefield’s retracted paper reported that “We investigated a consecutive series of children… Onset of behavioural symptoms was associated, by the parents, with measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination in eight of the 12 children, with measles infection in one child, and otitis media in another.” So 66% of the cases were associated with the MMR vaccine. The 2022 Morocco study: 70% of the 90 parents surveyed affirmed that the first autistic features appeared after vaccination with the MMR vaccine. The rates are nearly identical to the 66% rate in the Wakefield study. DeStefano paper evidence destruction: CDC scientist William Thompson was ordered by his bosses at the CDC to destroy ONLY the evidence linking vaccines and autism. Furthermore, the race subgroup analysis showing the link was omitted from the paper which is also unethical. When Congressman Bill Posey tried to get Thompson to testify in Congress, they shut him down so there was no testimony. This coverup was what convinced Wakefield that he was right: vaccines cause autism. More about the DeStefano paper in this article. Simpsonwood meeting: CDC scientist Thomas Verstraeten did a study in 1999 linking thimerosal with autism. They tried to make the autism signal go away. They couldn’t. The original signal was a RR=7.6 which is a huge signal. See my article for details and a link to the original Verstraeten study. Paul Offit lied to RFK Jr. about thimerosal: RFK Jr told me the story personally, but now, it’s on the Joe Rogan podcast Episode #1999. Start listening at 23:00. The punchline is at 28:33. Basically, the ethylmercury in the thimerosal makes a beeline out of your blood and deposits into your brain (unlike the methylmercury in fish which has a harder time entering your brain so it stays in your blood longer). Offit tried to convince RFK that the mercury gets excreted by referring to a paper. When RFK brought up the Burbacher study, there was dead silence on the line because Offit knew he had been caught in a deception. In short, thimerosal can seriously damage people’s brains. Vaccines are not supposed to cross the BBB. This creates biological plausibility needed for causality. The CDC study showing how the measles vaccine caused permanent brain damage The most remarkable paper showing the MMR vaccine causes permanent brain damage and death is this 1998 paper Acute Encephalopathy Followed by Permanent Brain Injury or Death Associated With Further Attenuated Measles Vaccines: A Review of Claims Submitted to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. It is written by CDC authors and has not been questioned or retracted and cited by 90 papers. Of course, if the authors wrote the vaccines killed these kids, they wouldn’t be able to get their paper published (that’s how “science” works). So you have to read between the lines that severe brain inflammation/damage might cause death. Do you think that might be reasonable? This excellent Substack article shows the statistically significant peaks at days 8 and 9 after the shot. That’s causality. So the CDC knew in 1998 that the measles vaccine was causing brain damage. But the paper said that the relationship “may exist.” Right. No other way to explain the data if it wasn’t causal. This gives us more biological plausibility. Studies of the vaxxed vs. unvaxxed There are numerous studies of the unvaxxed vs. vaxxed which show a statistically significant higher rate of autism and other chronic diseases in the vaccinated. More importantly, those who argue that this is not the case cannot produce a single study of the fully unvaxxed vs. fully vaxxed showing that the number of autism cases are comparable in the two groups. In fact, even in the highly acclaimed (but deeply flawed) Madsen study, there was a statistically significant higher incidence of autism in the “got MMR vax group” vs. “didn’t get MMR vax group” (p=.01) in the raw data before they made the signal go in the opposite direction by doing undisclosed adjustments (changing the relative risk from 1.45 to .92. The “adjusted” RR value had a confidence interval of .68 to 1.24 which means that even after applying all their “adjustments” that they can’t rule out the possibility that the MMR vaccine raises the risk of autism. And this is their best study!! Nobody ever tells you about this paper showing the underlying data they used is flawed. And nobody seemed to be bothered by the fact that number of black male children in this study severely underestimates the number of black kids in America. In fact, it doesn’t look at race at all in the study. Whoops! See this article for more about the Madsen study. Paul Thomas had 0 autism cases in 561 unvaxxed patients total. For patients who followed the CDC vaccination schedule, there were 15 autism cases in 894 patients. Hooker: 5.03 odds ratio for autism in the vaccinated vs. unvaccinated. Mawson: 4.2 odds ratio for autism in the vaccinated vs. unvaccinated (666 in this study) Control group: 82 odds ratio for autism in the vaccinated vs. unvaccinated. “For those with zero exposures to post-birth vaccines, pre-birth vaccines, or the K shot, the total rate of autism in the entire CGS is 0% (0 of 1,024)” Doing an OR calculation relative to my survey of 10,000 children: OR=82 CI:5.1197 to 1315 z statistic: 3.114 Significance level. P = 0.0018. Lyons-Weiler: The study was too small to assess autism risk, but showed better health outcomes among the unvaccinated than the vaccinated in other conditions. See this article which notes that the unvaccinated had better compliance to their wellness checks than the vaccinated which eliminates a common argument that anti-anti-vaxxers use. It says, “the unvaccinated families made their well-child visits with greater frequency than the vaccinated families.” A new study of 50,000 kids (submitted for publication but not yet published) shows the same odds ratios for chronic diseases as the Hooker and Mawson studies. The author is well respected and the dataset is very large. The Generation Rescue (GR) study that was done on June 26, 2007 showed that vaccinated kids were significantly worse off in every category they looked at. “For less than $200,000, we were able to complete a study that the CDC, with an $8 billion a year budget, has been unable or unwilling to do.” Where is the CDC survey? Nowhere to be found! They simply don’t want to do it. Read the survey and see this article for more information. GR couldn’t tamper with the study or manipulate the results because it was done by a third party survey firm with no conflicts of interest. If the drug companies didn’t like the result, they could have easily commissioned a different polling company. But they didn’t!!! Or maybe they did and simply chose not to publish the results because they were so bad. In any event, the lack of a poll showing the opposite of the GR poll is very very problematic for the “safe and effective” narrative. There are large cohorts with a no vaccination policy which have NO autism The Amish: We couldn’t find an Amish child with autism who wasn’t vaccinated or adopted. A large clinical pediatric practice I am personally very familiar with has eschewed the use of all vaccines and acetaminophen and achieved a zero autism rate over the past 25 years even though autism rates were skyrocketing in adjacent clinics. Furthermore, despite the lack of vaccination, the kids were also uniformly healthier than the kids in any of the surrounding clinics. This means that we can end the autism epidemic merely by altering individual choices we make. Unfortunately, this clinic cannot “go public” with this information because the medical boards would take away their license to practice medicine because they failed to push the vaccines on their patients like they were told to do by the medical establishment. There are other pediatric clinics in the US which eschew vaccination. For example, at Homefirst Medical Services, “We have about 30,000 or 35,000 children that we’ve taken care of over the years, and I don’t think we have a single case of autism in children delivered by us who never received vaccines.” What makes this believable is that other clinics who didn’t vaccinate reported the same results. My survey of the parents of 10,000 kids showed more vaccines mean that an autism diagnosis is more likely. The Homefirst clinic in Chicago run by Mayer Eisenstein had tens of thousands of patients and not a single case of autism over 47 years. He died in 2014. From this article in UPI: In the past, public-health officials have said such an approach [surveying the public to look at health outcomes in vaccinated vs. unvaccinated] would be impractical due to low numbers of never-vaccinated children, but this column found tens of thousands of such children — beginning with the Amish — in various locations in the United States. In our anecdotal and unscientific reporting, the rate of autism seemed strikingly lower in never-vaccinated children, … But this column identified several groups that might fit the bill — from the Amish in Pennsylvania Dutch country to homeschooled children to patients of a Chicago family practice. “I have not seen autism with the Amish,” said Dr. Frank Noonan, a family practitioner in Lancaster County, Pa., who has treated thousands of Amish for a quarter-century. “You’ll find all the other stuff, but we don’t find the autism. We’re right in the heart of Amish country and seeing none, and that’s just the way it is.” In Chicago, Homefirst Medical Services treats thousands of never-vaccinated children whose parents received exemptions through Illinois’ relatively permissive immunization policy. Homefirst’s medical director, Dr. Mayer Eisenstein, told us he is not aware of any cases of autism in never-vaccinated children; the national rate is 1 in 175, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. “We have a fairly large practice,” Eisenstein told us. “We have about 30,000 or 35,000 children that we’ve taken care of over the years, and I don’t think we have a single case of autism in children delivered by us who never received vaccines. “We do have enough of a sample,” Eisenstein said. “The numbers are too large to not see it. We would absolutely know. We’re all family doctors. If I have a child with autism come in, there’s no communication. It’s frightening. You can’t touch them. It’s not something that anyone would miss.” The before:after odds measures The before:after odds measures are the most stunning pieces of evidence there is for vaccines causing autism. Many parents notice a sudden, dramatic change in their child shortly after vaccination. But the funny thing is, none of them noticed this right before the appointment with the pediatrician to get the shot. It’s simply nearly impossible to achieve a disparity like this if the shots are safe. This isn’t observer bias either. If a child suddenly developed autistic behaviors right before the doctor appointment to get vaccinated, you can bet the first thing out of the parent’s mouth would be telling the doctor before the shot of the sudden change. What pediatrician in the world can recall that ever happening? Yet we are inundated with stories of parents saying their child got a fever right after the shot, the parent may have given the child Tylenol (which makes everything worse), and within hours, the child is never the same. These clearly aren’t anti-vaxxer parents who believe Wakefield because if they were, they wouldn’t have vaccinated their child!!! So there is no way to ignore these reports. Pediatrician Doug Hulstedt statistics: He had 150 autism patients, about half where the parents linked the autism to the vaccine. He said there were 44 cases where autism signs developed very quickly. In every single case, the regression happened after a vaccine shot rather than in the days or weeks before a vaccine appointment. That is statistically impossible if the vaccine is a placebo. But even more devastating is that you cannot find a pediatrician in the world where the before/after stats are comparable. Why not? If the vaccines are safe, every pediatrician should have comparable stats and it would be impossible to find a single Doug Hulstedt. My survey of parents of 300 autistic kids showed a 0:66 odds for getting autism the month before a vax shot vs. within a month after a shot. This is in remarkable agreement with Doug Hulstedt’s numbers. Other evidence Autism is brain injury. The only things that could cause such an injury is a pathogen that is either injected, ingested, inhaled, or absorbed by the skin. There may also be a genetic cause. This limits our solution space. There is not a single cause for autism. If you remove the major causes (e.g., vaccination, use of Tylenol, etc.), autism will still happen, but at a much lower rate. The pathogen must be relatively new because autism rates didn’t “take off” until 1983. In 1983, the Centers for Disease Control (“CDC”) recommended a total of 10 vaccines for our children up to the age of 5. In 2007, the CDC recommended 36, an increase of 260%, or 3.6x. You can see the slope change at both those dates in the graph below. This rapid climb was not due to a change in criteria to diagnose ASD. Such a change would create a quick step function and just shift the existing line upwards; the slope wouldn’t change. Also, this growth isn’t due to a genetic issue because genetic traits don’t replicate exponentially over short time periods like this. The fact that we can dramatically reduce the rate of autism by withholding all vaccines suggests that the vaccines are the major driver. Distortion of truth When people on the other side of the argument have to lie and distort the truth to make their point, you really have to wonder why they have to do that. For example, For example, Matt Carey when he wrote about William Thompson’s study, he claimed that there was nothing wrong with excluding the RACE subgroup analysis from their published paper or being ordered to destroy ONLY the documents that were related to the RACE subgroup analysis (i.e., to ONLY destroy that data that goes against the CDC narrative). Carey excels at gaslighting people who don’t know how science works. He wrote another article which deliberately misrepresented the results of the Generation Rescue survey (Matt claimed they showed the opposite of what they actually did). Nobody can read the results of the GR survey and think that the vaccines are bad. But he deliberately didn’t link to the source so you can’t easily check out that he’s lying. As a result, none of the comments pointed out the huge misdirection. Professor Anders Hviid had to create a bogus study which was designed not to find a signal. And when I notified him that another paper proved that his underlying data was inaccurate, he ignored me. When I asked to see the data, he blocked me. Lots more in my article. Finally, in general, the anti-anti-vaxxers will not engage in a civil dialog to discover the truth. That should be very very concerning. Can they simply “explain away”everything in this article? Can we talk about it? Even more evidence See my slide deck. The admission of a top autism expert Finally, the biggest piece of evidence comes from James Lyons-Weiler who got a call from one of the top autism experts in the world. He told James that “We all know vaccines cause autism. We just aren’t allowed to talk about it.” He was referring to his fellow autism experts. If they admitted this, they would lose their funding, their job, their license to practice medicine, their hospital privileges, their board certifications, etc. That’s why I can’t get a debate and when I try to reach out to these experts they ghost me. And that’s why there are never the before:after studies and why all there are so many studies are designed to not find a signal. Summary Science is about matching hypotheses to data to which hypothesis is best able to explain all the data. It’s clear that there have been studies which have been deliberately or inadvertently designed to not find a signal. This doesn’t mean there isn’t a link; it simply means the study was inadequate to find the link or the underlying data was compromised. The thing is that if there really is not a link, then no matter what you do, you won’t find a link. But the problem they have is that there have been other studies which show very clearly that vaccines cause autism that cannot be explained away because the signals are too strong. Furthermore, I was unable to find a single study showing that the fully vaccinated had better health outcomes than the fully unvaccinated. Judy Gerberding, the former head of the CDC, promised to do such a study in 2005. Twenty years later, that study has still never been done. So in the meantime, the precautionary principle of medicine is pretty clear on what we should be doing: nobody should be getting any vaccines. https://www.globalresearch.ca/if-vaccines-dont-cause-autism-then-how-do-you-explain-all-this-evidence/5822765 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted June 24 Author Share Posted June 24 (edited) Camelot Part 4: The Conservation of Britain Britain’s built heritage provides a connection to our past and has evolved to suit the climate of this place and therefore contains within it guidance towards the challenges required in building in these islands and how to overcome them. The use of local building materials lends a distinctive regional flavour to Britain’s building stock. The same argument could be made for Britain’s wider cultural heritage of: music, food, dress, language, arts and crafts. Post-modernism, in the 20th Century, has discarded the rule book and disregarded many of the lessons of the past, to our detriment. Marxist city planners of the 1960’s sought to bulldoze irreplaceable historic building stock in order to create a new model of living. They built new high density housing blocks in a stripped back style which eschewed adornment known as ‘brutalism’; an example of this would be Grenfell Tower. This new style did not use local building materials which root a style or building in its geographical place but instead used universal concrete which lacked regional context. These featureless blocks removed any emotional connection to place or the past and their new inhabitants found it harder to get to know their neighbours than their parents who had lived in terraced streets where they chatted to their neighbours from their front door or in passing as they walked through their street. Concurrent with this new more lonely form of living was the replacement of the butchers and greengrocers with ‘supermarkets’ which depersonalised the process of shopping and globalised the food supply thereby disconnecting the British diet from the seasons. The local butcher or grocer was replaced behind the till in the supermarkets by a transient and ever-shifting workforce who will increasingly be made up of migrants who have been re-located by the corporations to fill a job post thereby creating further disconnection from the local community. As automation increases even those migrant workers will be replaced by automated checkouts thereby removing human interaction entirely. As public houses close due to rising costs caused by inflation (from money printing) and economic pressure caused through the lockdowns, communities are losing a further meeting place as human relations are designed-out of modern living by impersonal, international corporations causing an epidemic of loneliness. Clearly development is not merely dictated by ‘market forces’ as the developers pursue profit, but also by ideological agendas and we as the end-users need to decide if the resultant outcomes are in the best interests of the British people and our nation. These forces of change have at various times threatened the ongoing existence of our built heritage which was constructed through great pains and ingenuity by our ancestors. The practise of the past was to build to last which has left us with an incredible legacy. The buildings create an inspiring and uplifting environment for people to live and work in and around and attract visitors who generate huge tourism revenue. The Roman architect Vitruvius said that the ideal building should embody three qualities: strength, usefulness and delight. If we look at the public art placed in public spaces since the post-war, marxist push to break from the past and create a ‘tabula rasa’ (blank slate) out of which they can then remodel society along marxist-technocratic lines, we can ask ourselves: does it serve a purpose to our society? Does it delight, inspire and uplift? Is it well constructed so that it will last for many generations thereby creating an ongoing connection that spans the generations and enhances the cultural and social cohesion and stability of our nation? The comparatively short shelf-life of concrete means the marxist ‘brutalist’ buildings will not last long enough to form a cultural connection to our forebears and are now being bulldozed to make way for steel and glass structures which may themselves become referred to as ‘carbuncles on the face of the city’ like their concrete predecessors. A buzzword of globalism is ‘sustainability’ and older stone and brick building stock has a lot of energy embodied in it because of the resources used to construct it so it makes sense to utilise them. Neil Oliver has raised the concern that as part of the globalist agenda to move people off the land, the local and national authorities could use ‘green’ policies to condemn old buildings. For example they could say old homes haven’t got sufficient insulation or adequate provision for modern heating systems therefore they are now deemed untenable under ‘sustainability goals’ of the globalist United Nations; the occupiers are then relocated to a modern housing development where they can live cheek by jowl with people from all around the world whilst being monitored and micro-managed by the SMART ‘internet of things’ and cooked slowly in the 5G microwave ‘cloud’ that makes all the appliances ‘smart’ (wireless) and centrally controlled by an over-arching and impersonal artificial intelligence. Visitors to Britain cannot fail to notice the prevalence of castles within these shores and its worth noting that not all these castles were constructed on the coast, like Dover castle, to repel invaders. Many of the castles were strategically placed to control the flows of people and commerce and to enable the swift suppression of dissent amongst the general populace. Those castles were the SMART-grid of their day, created to prevent the British people from rising above the station of propertyless peasants to that of propertied merchants who in turn take an interest in wider affairs and inevitably desire to have a say in them. Everyone is born into different circumstances and therefore it is vital that opportunity exists for all which means that we should strive to ensure that the resources and institutions used in common should provide for a persons needs and enable them to use their innate talents to flourish in the field of their choice. In the modern ‘woke’ cultural climate of the marxist-technocrats with their vision of centralised global governance over a dispossessed hodge-podge of rootless people, those speaking of conserving the past and maintaining roots are often viciously maligned as being ‘xenophobic’ or ‘insular’ or worse. I believe a more nuanced path is possible between the extremes and that the opportunity to thrive and contribute to our national project should exist to everyone in Britain, regardless of their gender, race or sexual preference. The conservation of Britain is not about rooting Britain in the past but rather about paying consideration to what works for us as a society on all levels, from both the past and the present; the goal should be to learn from the lessons of the past to marry the best of the past with the best of the present. This creates a sense of place and also an understanding of how we got to where we are as the past contains lessons not only of pathways to success but also about pitfalls and pathways to dark places that should be avoided. It might be worth considering the fate of dispossessed people from the past and the social ills of drink, drugs and family breakup that invariably follows the cultural disintegration of a people. I believe that is the cultural desert that the globalist social engineers are trying to foist upon us. What many academics ignore as they discuss colonialism is that Britain itself was subjected to colonialism in 1066 and that the British people have themselves undergone enormous cultural uphevals as the ruling class took possession of the land and its resources and then imposed massive structural changes for example the harrying of the north which involved genocide, crop destruction and the burning of villages which led to terrible famine. There was the ‘agricultural revolution’ which drove many people off the land and then the ‘industrial revolution’ which absorbed them into the cities and exploited their labour. As those people began to organise and improve working conditions the ruling elites dragged them into two consecutive world wars which bled our country white of its menfolk. The ruling elite immediately moved to press home their goal of global governance by beginning a process of mass immigration to replace the decimated native population. Some people might claim that these social movements improved prosperity but there are a few points to consider. Firstly what prosperity might we have enjoyed in that timeframe, had that ruling class not imposed itself upon us? Secondly what cost have we endured as a result of disconnections from the land and dislocation from community? Thirdly we can, I believe, see this shift as part of a progression towards an end goal I believe is now coming into sharper focus. The ruling class has through its global empire often referred to by the misnomer ‘the British Empire’ presided over a conquered British people. More accurately it should be termed the Freemasonic Empire and it expanded its reach globally and has consolidated its grip on the global economy and resources. That globalist ruling elite are now signalling through their public bodies such as the World Economic Forum that they intend to bring about another shift they term ‘the fourth industrial revolution’ and their public figurehead Klaus Schwab has stated that the covid psuedo-pandemic is the starting gun for this ‘great reset’. Many of us dissatisfied with the direction of travel may in fact agree that the world does need a reset of some kind and the purpose of the report will be to examine the shape of that by assessing Britain through a values based methodology. Conservation is the management of change, therefore the goal of the report is not to make an argument for the preservation of Britain as an ossified museum piece, but rather to act as a tool through which we can examine what Britain means to us and therefore what we value about it and wish to carry forward to future generations as we continue to innovate, create and improve our nation. A final word then on the ongoing role of the United Nations in the conservation of the world’s heritage. The UN created UNESCO to act as a body to inventorise the most significant built heritage of mankind. Individual nation states are able to recommend their heritage to UNESCO seeking to gain ‘World Heritage Site’ status. UNESCO has its own criteria for assessing heritage and they seek what they deem to be the stand-out example of mankind’s heritage. For example if they were to award WHS status to an example of wall building then the Great Wall of China would be chosen for that. There have been claims of bias by third world countries as most designations have gone to first world countries who perhaps have more sophisticated bureaucracies which are able to better navigate the intricacies of the application process. I have heard a claim, but I don’t know if there is any veracity to this, that UNESCO heritage is somehow going to tie into a globalised central bank digital currency, acting as a form of tangible collateral however it looks like the rising stars of China and Russia are putting their energies into the accumulations of gold which can be used to create a gold-backed currency. The corporate media presents global change as a conflict between the ‘west’s’ forces, which through NATO pursue hegemonic global dominance under a UNIPOLAR WORLD whilst Russia and China push for a MULTIPOLAR vision. As I watch WEF associates like Henry Kissinger and Bill Gates play grab-ass with Eurasian leaders I suspect that behind the surface conflict lies a shared vision for the world while warfare, orchestrated economic upheval, manufactured food scarcities and pandemics are used to lever a bewildered, frightened, hungry and disheartened global population into a globalised, technocratic SMART gulag run by ruthlessly dispassionate artificial intelligence. I believe the conflict is really just a hegelian dialectic aimed at creating a third way synthesis: globalised technocracy under a central world government. (value based report to follow) Edited June 24 by Macnamara 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted June 24 Author Share Posted June 24 (edited) IMF “working hard” on new global CBDC platform to replace dollar and other national currencies If the International Monetary Fund (IMF) is successful in unleashing a new "global Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC ) platform," as managing director Kristalina Georgieva says the group is currently "working hard" on, then soon the world's entire money supply will be controlled by a "group of unelected bureaucrats." Right now, the various currencies of the world are, for the most part, already controlled by unelected, private central banking cartels. A new IMF CBDC, however, would unify them all into one cashless cryptocurrency that everyone will be forced to use in order to buy and sell. "If we are to be successful, CBDCs could not be fragmented national propositions," Georgieva declared at a policy roundtable discussion with Bank Al-Maghrib in Rabat, Morocco about CBDCs. "To have transactions more efficient and fairer, we need systems that connect countries. In other words, we need interoperability. For this reason, at the IMF we are working hard on the concept of a global CBDC platform to trade and to manage risks." Communist China currently has the world's largest CBDC pilot program with 118 million participants According to Georgieva, CBDCs offer "more people access to financial services, and at a lower cost, enhancing payment system 'efficiency' and 'resilience' and making cross-border payments 'cheaper and quicker' while reducing the number of needed intermediaries." If there are many different CBDCs, though, then there is a greater risk of "currency substitution and capital flow volatility," she warned. This is why the IMF wants there to be just one single CBDC that is used by the entire world, which Georgieva says would enhance "international economic stability." Even without CBDCs, Georgieva said that "economic integration" under a new global world economic order is still possible. Still, if CBDCs are only used domestically rather than internationally, "we are under-utilizing their capacity," she alleged. When asked when the IMF plans to unleash a global CBDC, Georgieva dodged the question and apparently starting talking about something else entirely. She did, however, indicate with a smile that 114 central banks are in the process of at least exploring CBDCs, and that 10 have already "crossed the finish line," the biggest one being in communist China with 118 million participants. Georgieva revealed three primary "policy" challenges that exist in bringing to fruition a cross-border CBDC payment system. These include "common settlement asset," "common legal and regulatory frameworks," and "shared infrastructure," all of which she claims can be remedied with the rollout of a global CBDC. Back in April, the IMF announced the creation of a CBDC handbook that central banks and governments around the world can use to assist with their national CBDC rollouts. Former People's Bank of China deputy governor and current IMF deputy managing director Bo Li indicated that this handbook will "hopefully help countries make as well-informed decisions as possible" regarding their respective CBDC programs. Li further revealed, and quite boldly, that CBDC transaction data can be used to enforce social credit scoring systems similar to the one that controls people's behavior in communist China. "Those transaction data in terms of how many coffees I drink every day, where I buy coffee, do I use UBER every day and what kind of working hours I have," Li said last October. "Those non-traditional data can be very useful for financial service providers to give me a credit score." According to Sam Callahan, a lead analyst for Swan Bitcoin, the Bank of International Settlements (BIS) has been in the process of designing an international CBDC program, or a "multi-CBDC system," since 2020 when everyone was distracted by the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19). http://www.stationgossip.com/2023/06/imf-working-hard-on-new-global-cbdc.html Edited June 24 by Macnamara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarcusOmouse Posted June 27 Share Posted June 27 On 6/10/2023 at 2:49 AM, Macnamara said: Video: Pfizer’s “Secret” Report on the Covid Vaccine. Beyond Manslaughter. The Evidence is Overwhelming. The Vaccine Should Be Immediately Withdrawn Worldwide By Prof Michel Chossudovsky Global Research, June 05, 2023 The following video interview with Prof. Michel Chossudovsky pertains to the Confidential Pfizer Report released as part of a Freedom of Information (FOI) procedure. The report is a bombshell. The vaccine was launched in mid-December 2020. By the end of February 2021, “Pfizer had already received more than 1,200 reports of deaths allegedly caused by the vaccine and tens of thousands of reported adverse events, including 23 cases of spontaneous abortions out of 270 pregnancies and more than 2,000 reports of cardiac disorders.” see video here: https://www.globalresearch.ca/video-pfizers-secret-report-on-the-covid-vaccine-beyond-manslaughter-the-evidence-is-overwhelming-the-vaccine-should-be-immediately-withdrawn-worldwide/5780561 A clear attack on women's fertility: Dr. Naomi Wolf Uncovers Pfizer’s Depopulation Agenda, as Evidenced by Its Own Documents https://rumble.com/v2rdz9s-dr.-naomi-wolf-uncovers-pfizers-depopulation-agenda-as-evidenced-by-its-own.html I was just about to crosspost a link to such findings as exposed by the latest interview given by Dr Wolf on UK column. See my "real gems" thread 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted June 29 Author Share Posted June 29 On 6/4/2023 at 9:14 PM, Macnamara said: A culture of fear (the new normal)... NHS row as staff plan Pride march through grounds of Scotland children’s hospital Staff are being urged to brandish banners and placards at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh but some say it is creating a culture of fear By Daniel Sanderson, Scottish Correspondent 1 June 2023 • 9:12pm NHS bosses have waded into the “toxic” debate over transgender rights by allowing activists to organise an “ideological and political” march through the grounds of one of Scotland’s largest hospitals. The country’s second-largest health board is facing accusations of undermining the impartiality of the health service by allowing the Pride event, at which staff have been urged to brandish banners and placards, at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh on Friday afternoon. Some NHS Lothian staff claimed the official backing for the event was fuelling a culture of fear in which gender-critical staff and patients were being made to feel unwelcome at hospitals. The support for the march came as it emerged Edinburgh’s Sick Kids hospital is attempting to gain the formal approval of LGBT Youth Scotland, a controversial lobby group with links to Mermaids, which promotes an “affirming” model of care for young people with gender issues. The development led to claims that the Scottish NHS is failing to learn the lessons of the Tavistock scandal, where questions have been raised about the influence of activists with no medical training inr the treatment of child patients. Toxic and divisive The one-mile Pride march will begin outside the Sick Kids hospital, which is on the same huge site at Little France, in the southeast of the Scottish capital, as the Royal Infirmary. “To have such a prominent march on an issue that is so toxic and divisive should not be allowed when the health service is supposed to be apolitical,” a doctor who works at the campus said. “The NHS should be about bringing people of different beliefs and cultures together, not picking a side on an issue that is so controversial and will make patients and staff feel they are not welcome.” The clinician, who asked not to be named for fear their job could be at risk for speaking out, said it was “very concerning” to see NHS Lothian’s children’s services attempt to gain charter status from LGBT Youth Scotland, which will have a stall at the Pride event. A large transgender rights Pride flag has recently been given a prominent place at the Sick Kids hospital, furthering fears among some staff that the organisation had been “captured” by activists. “There are multiple issues with having a trans flag at the entrance of the specialist child psychiatric facility in Scotland,” the doctor added. “We’ve seen what happened at the Tavistock when Mermaids were given so much influence but they don’t seem to want to learn any of the lessons. “Why should an organisation with no clinical clout whatsoever be able to lobby a specialist children’s hospital? “Staff are frightened about speaking up about this and feel they are being forced to toe the line. “But a parasite needs a host and it just seems like the NHS has been completely captured by this ideology.” The Pride march has been organised by NHS Lothian’s LGBT+ staff network as well as workers at the Royal Infirmary and Sick Kids, officially called the Royal Hospital for Children and Young people. LGBT Youth Scotland have been involved in designing an event which organisers said would “celebrate the diversity of our dedicated team”. The march has been promoted through NHS Lothian’s official channels with a “small fair” and music also promised as part of “festivities”. ‘Staff fear being called bigots’ Another staff member said: “This might seem like just a nice celebration but it’s actually contributing to a culture of fear which makes staff feel that if they voice any disagreement to gender ideology they will be immediately called a bigot. “If the NHS now does not believe in biology then we really are in la la land.” A third NHS worker said: “The NHS has always been known as apolitical and for good reason. If you allow one group to do this, how do you say no to another? “Allowing an ideological and political march to go ahead will open a can of worms. “NHS Lothian is not a transphobic or homophobic organisation so why on earth is there a need for a protest march on site? “We’ll have patients and visitors who might be at hospital for really distressing reasons and they’ll see this and won’t have a scooby what is going on.” LGBT Youth Scotland was approached for comment. Janis Butler, director for HR and organisational development for NHS Lothian, said the “event was in line with NHS Lothian’s “organisational values”. She added: “This is a celebratory event organised by our staff, including local LGBT + staff and allies networks at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Royal Hospital for Children and Young People and University of Edinburgh to mark the start of Pride month. There is a mini wellbeing fair with information stalls, art, music, picnics and an organised health walk around our dedicated outdoor wellbeing path. “It’s important that NHS Lothian positively contributes to tackling prejudice and promoting understanding of the diverse group of people in our communities who work for and with us and who use our services.” https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/06/01/nhs-row-staff-pride-march-grounds-scotland-edinburgh-trans/ Hospital facing backlash after chaplain puts up LGBT flags in prayer room for gravely ill children - leaving one practising Christian mother 'shaking with anger' Maxwell Reay, a transgender man, activist and minister at a United Reformed Church is in charge of 'spiritual care' at Edinburgh's famous Sick Kids hospital The flags include ones denoting polyamory, genderfluid and agender people By Martin Robinson and Iwan Stone Published: 10:30 BST, 29 June 2023 | Updated: 13:16 BST, 29 June 2023 A trans chaplain and the NHS faced a backlash from parents of terminally and gravely ill children after a prayer room was covered with LGBT flags for Pride month. Maxwell Reay, a transgender man, activist and minister at a United Reformed Church in Edinburgh is also in charge of 'spiritual care' at the city's famous Sick Kids hospital. A spokesman for NHS Lothian said: 'The flags were used as temporary decoration in the sanctuary to mark the Pride day of celebration.' But one practising Christian family - who is related to a terminally ill toddler that uses the facility - said she was left 'shaking with anger' after the prayer room was transformed. They claim the room is being used for 'activism' for a cause that is in conflict with their religious beliefs. Maxwell Reay, a transgender man, activist and minister at a United Reformed Church in Edinburgh is also in charge of 'spiritual care' at the city's famous Sick Kids hospital https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12245789/Hospital-chaplain-puts-LGBT-flags-prayer-room-gravely-ill-children.html 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.jpg.8081a54a3b74a5d1823dfac966666137.jpg)
.jpg.594f0ef23288ec5ab04539b2f8a8dbd4.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.