Macnamara Posted December 4, 2020 Author Share Posted December 4, 2020 Pretty sure if i 'lost' £50 billion from my workplace i'd go to jail for THEFT! Bank of England is slammed by MPs for losing track of £50BILLION of banknotes and told to find where 'missing' cash is 'stashed' Public Accounts Committee said Bank needs to 'get a better handle on currency' It said authorities were behind curve in ensuring access to cash for consumers It said they are failing to act on dangers of hardship if moving towards cashless The committee said there are implications for public policy and the public purse By James Gant For Mailonline Published: 07:51, 4 December 2020 | Updated: 08:00, 4 December 2020 The Bank of England should investigate where around £50billion of 'missing' banknotes is 'stashed', a committee monitoring the effectiveness of public spending has said. The Public Accounts Committee said the Bank needs to 'get a better handle on the national currency it controls'. It said authorities have been behind the curve in ensuring access to cash for consumers and businesses, and are failing to understand or act on the dangers of hardship if the UK continues moving towards a cashless society. The committee said there are implications for public policy and the public purse if a material proportion of the large volume of banknotes whose whereabouts or use are unknown are being used for illegal purposes. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9017473/MPs-slam-Bank-England-losing-track-50BILLION-banknotes.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted December 5, 2020 Author Share Posted December 5, 2020 U.S. Air Force Uses IoT to Monitor Hundreds of Millions of Fitness Trackers, Cars, Computers, Routers, and More BN Frank December 2, 2020 By B.N. Frank For many years experts have issued serious warnings about privacy AND cybersecurity risks associated with Internet of Things (IoT) technology (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5). Nevertheless, the U.S. Air Force plans to start using it to monitor hundreds of millions of devices. From the Wall Street Journal: Next Step in Government Data Tracking Is the Internet of Things U.S. Air Force experiments with monitoring peripherals—from autos to fitness trackers WASHINGTON—U. S. government agencies from the military to law enforcement have been buying up mobile-phone data from the private sector to use in gathering intelligence, monitoring adversaries and apprehending criminals. Now, the U.S. Air Force is experimenting with the next step. The Air Force Research Laboratory is testing a commercial software platform that taps mobile phones as a window onto usage of hundreds of millions of computers, routers, fitness trackers, modern automobiles and other networked devices, known collectively as the “Internet of Things.” Read full article Even if the constant surveillance doesn’t bother you, maybe the constant radiation exposure will. Last year, the World Health Organization warned that exposure to high levels of Electromagnetic Fields (aka “Electrosmog”) could cause health issues in a significant percentage of the population. Sources of Electrosmog include all wireless technology – activity trackers, Apple AirPods, cell phones, home assistants (Alexa, Google Nest, etc.), utility “Smart” Meters, WiFi routers, wireless chargers, etc. Research has determined that wireless exposure can: cause hair loss cause rashes, other skin irritations, and premature skin aging cause and/or increase blood sugar fluctuations cause and/or increase cardiac health issues cause and/or increase insomnia compromise respiratory health disrupt the blood-brain barrier (see 1, 2, 3) increase cancer risk (see 1, 2, 3, 4) increase risk for “Microwave Sickness”, Electromagnetic Sensitivity and Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity reduce immunity to viruses and other illnesses and MORE https://www.activistpost.com/2020/12/u-s-air-force-uses-iot-to-monitor-hundreds-of-millions-of-fitness-trackers-cars-computers-routers-and-more.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted December 6, 2020 Author Share Posted December 6, 2020 21 hours ago, Macnamara said: U.S. Air Force Uses IoT to Monitor Hundreds of Millions of Fitness Trackers, Cars, Computers, Routers, and More Now, the U.S. Air Force is experimenting with the next step. The Air Force Research Laboratory is testing a commercial software platform that taps mobile phones as a window onto usage of hundreds of millions of computers, routers, fitness trackers, modern automobiles and other networked devices, known collectively as the “Internet of Things.” Read full article I'm telling ya, get rid of your smart phone! (but nobodys listening!) This New Technology Will Dangerously Expand Government Spying On Citizens by Tyler Durden Sat, 12/05/2020 Authored by Jack Rasmus via Counterpunch.org, If you’re worried about the capability of government to conduct surveillance of citizens engaged in political assembly and protest, or even just personal activity, then you should be aware the technological capability of government surveillance is about to expand exponentially. The US Air Force’s Research Lab (yes, it has its own lab) has recently signed a contract to test new software of a company called SignalFrame, a Washington DC wireless tech company. The company’s new software is able to access smartphones, and from your phone jump off to access any other wireless or bluetooth device in the near vicinity. To quote from the article today in the Wall St. Journal, the smartphone is used “as a window onto usage of hundreds of millions of computers,s routers, fitness trackers, modern automobiles and other networked devices, known collectively as the ‘Internet of Things’.” Your smartphone in effect becomes a government listening device that detects and accesses all nearby wireless or bluetooth devices, or anything that has a MAC address for that matter. How ‘near’ is nearby is not revealed by the company, or the Air Force, both of which refused to comment on the Wall St. Journal story. But with the expansion of 5G wireless, it should be assumed it’s more than just a couple steps from your smartphone. One can imagine some scary scenarios with this capability in the hands of government snoops: Not only would the government know your geographical location via the GPS signal to your cellphone. They’d know what you are doing. And with whom. A political gathering would allow them to see all the owners of other cellphones in the vicinity of a protest or demonstration. How many are gathering at a particular street or location. The direction they might be heading. Or whether there’s an organization meeting in a hall or room and who (with a cellphone as well) might be attending. If you’re driving on a winding coastal or mountain road, it would know, and could possibly access, your car’s various electronic systems to turn them off. It might access your car’s circuit board that governs your power steering when you’re driving in an area of winding roads. Or it might be able to just shut down your car’s electrical system and remotely lock all your doors. The police no longer have to engage in highway chases until capture. The new tech would allow the government to access the data on your fitbit device while you’re jogging. Or worse, maybe even interfere with the signal on your heart pacemaker device. The technology might be used to access your smartphone, and from there to turn on your home Alexa device to listen in and record conversations without you ever knowing. Or to listen in on your zoom conferencing on your laptop. Or maybe even worse, to shut down or bypass the safety features on your home furnace equipment. Or turn off your home security system. And with 5G wireless broadband, the tracking might be extended well beyond the range of a bluetooth device. Add 5G broadband wireless to SignalFrame’s technology, and then wed that to the capability of machine learning and artificial intelligence, and you get instant processing of a massive amount of data on any targeted person or gathering! https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/new-technology-will-dangerously-expand-government-spying-citizens 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted December 7, 2020 Author Share Posted December 7, 2020 (edited) In this piece in the daily mail (see below) john humphries is trying to tell us that vaccines have been the cause of improvements in public health but is that supported by the facts? For example at the end of the piece he claims that vaccines have eradicated polio! But that is not the case. All that has happened is that polio has been re-named 'acute flaccid myelitis': JOHN HUMPHRYS: Don't be conned by the anti-vaxx zealots... they threaten to do serious harm to all of us By John Humphrys For The Daily Mail Published: 00:05, 7 December 2020 | Updated: 00:26, 7 December 2020 And then, one day, all of us kids were told to line up in the assembly hall because we were to be given a sugar lump. A rare treat. But the real gift was a few years off. By the time I hit 30, polio had been vanquished. That’s what vaccination does. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-9024333/JOHN-HUMPHRYS-Dont-conned-anti-vaxx-zealots.html Edited December 7, 2020 by Macnamara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted December 7, 2020 Author Share Posted December 7, 2020 (edited) So, as a nurse, you are afraid that the public will learn the truth that the covid vaccine makes people sick? If that is the truth then why would it be a problem for the public to become aware of that? Nurse in Pfizer's vaccine trial who worried she had COVID-19 after developing high fever says she can see 'the wrong message going viral' if doctors don't warn of 'scary' possible side effects Kristen Choi, an assistant professor in the School of Nursing at UCLA, was a participant in Pfizer's coronavirus vaccine trial After receiving the second jab, she experienced several side effects including pain at the injection side, headache, nausea and a fever of 104.9F Choi said her symptoms disappeared within 24 hours but that she did worry she had contracted COVID-19 The nurse says the side effects are a natural response from the immune system but worries it will turn people off from getting the vaccine By Mary Kekatos Senior Health Reporter For Dailymail.com Published: 16:20, 7 December 2020 | Updated: 16:20, 7 December 2020 A nurse who took part in Pfizer Inc's late-stage coronavirus vaccine trial said she experienced several side effects, leading her to worry she may have contracted the disease. Kristen Choi, an assistant professor of the School of Nursing at the University of California, Los Angeles, enrolled in the study in August and received two shots of the experimental vaccine. However, after the second jab, she had a headache, nausea, chills and even reached a fever of nearly 105F (40.5C) - the highest of her life. She said that she worried that she may have contracted COVID-19 - and that her friends believed she did. Choi says her symptoms disappeared after 24 hours and said that doctors need to warn patients about the side effects so that 'the wrong message doesn't go viral.' In an opinion piece, published in JAMA Internal Medicine on Monday, Choi said she enrolled in phase III of Pfizer's coronavirus vaccine trial after seeing an advertisement on Instagram in early August 2020. She said the recruitment website was inviting and said volunteering to participate felt like the 'honorable thing to do.' Within a few days of entering her contact information, she received a call from the study coordinator asking her to take part in the trial. Because the trial is randomized, considered the gold standard of medical research, Choi didn't know if she would be getting the shot or the placebo. Choi said her symptoms disappeared within 24 hours but that her friends believed she contracted COVID-19, and that she was even worried of the possibility herself. The nurse says the side effects are a natural response from the immune system but worries it will turn people off from getting the vaccine. Pictured: The first patient enrolled in Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial at the University of Maryland School of Medicine in Baltimore, receives an injection, May 4 RELATED ARTICLES Experimental antiviral drug completely stops... Can the next coronavirus hotspot be predicted? New tracking... Share this article Share 'I thought about why getting the experimental vaccine rather than the placebo mattered for me as a health care worker - and then, even those stakes seemed low when I thought about what randomization must feel like for patients,' she wrote. 'I sent up a final prayer for the active vaccine as the research nurse finally administered the blind-to-me injection.' Choi said she didn't experience any side effects aside from soreness at the site of injection. She returned one month later for the second of two shots but, this time, she had a much different experience. 'My arm quickly became painful at the injection site, much more than the first time,' Choi wrote. 'By the end of the day, I felt light-headed, chilled, nauseous, and had a splitting headache. I went to bed early and fell asleep immediately. 'Around midnight, I woke up feeling worse - feverish and chilled, nauseated, dizzy, and hardly able to lift my arm from muscle pain at the injection site.' Choi recounts waking up at 5.30am and having a fever of 104.9F (40.5C), which is the highest fever she said she's ever had. After taking acetaminophen and drinking some water, her fever fell over the next few hours to 102F (38.9C). The next day, she called the research nurse who told her to monitor her symptoms and let the team know if anything changed. Choi's fever was low-grade the rest of the day and by the next morning, the only symptom she was 'a sore, swollen bump at the injection site.' According to data from Pfizer's phase I trial, adverse effects are common in adults between ages 18 and 55. A total of 75 percent experienced fatigue, 68 percent had a headache, 33 percent experienced chills, 25 percent reported muscle pain and 17 percent had a fever. Because of this, Choi believes she received the experimental vaccine 'If this vaccine is approved, it is possible that most people receiving the vaccine could have [one] or more reactions to the vaccine like I did,' she wrote. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-9026685/Nurse-took-Pfizers-coronavirus-vaccine-trial-said-highest-fever-life.html Edited December 8, 2020 by Basket Case edited as requested by PM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted December 8, 2020 Author Share Posted December 8, 2020 (edited) Pro-bioweapon crown agents A piece in the Daily Mail by Dan Hodges has accused people who question the covid vaccination online of working for Putin! Well if that's the case Dan when does my cheque arrive in the post cos I've had didly-squat from any russians! Here's the thing Dan.....you are implying that you are acting for Britain but you aren't. You are representing the crown, which is that strange, undefined entity that sits at the top of the british legal system, military and intelligence services and it isn't simply the royal family; the crown is more than the royal family, it is the head of the freemasonic hierarchy in this country. That's who you ultimately work for Dan. I don't work for the crown. I define 'britain' as the land and its people. The crown is not britain and yet you are one of those people who wrongly conflates the crown with britain. The crown is just a kabbalistic parasite that sits on the top of the british people hoovering up their wealth and energy. Indeed the sphere at the top of the kabbalist tree of life is known as 'kether', the crown. That crown is currently working against the british people and is trying to push a bioweapon in the form of a covid 'vaccine' on the british people. That's what you are supporting. You mention lord haw haw but you and media voices like jeremy vine that try and squash any questioning of the official narratives on things like the covid vaccine (which is being rolled out BEFORE it has even completed its trial phases) are the lord haw haw. You are the one spreading lies on the airwaves to the british people. We won't forget DAN HODGES: How Vladimir Putin's anti-vaxxers are trying to use Covid to kill us as surely as his agents did in Salisbury By Dan Hodges For The Mail On Sunday Published: 23:27, 5 December 2020 | Updated: 02:04, 6 December 2020 Yes, Boris is right not to force the vaccine down people’s throats. But he can’t simply hope that if we ignore them, Putin and his anti-vax Lord Haw-Haws will go away. We have seen too many times in the social-media age what happens when the truth turns its back on a lie. This morning, the St Petersburg bot-farm servers are whirring into life. Putin’s biological weapons attack on Britain is about to recommence. Exposing his lies, and trusting in the Covid vaccine, is how we defeat him. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-9021779/DAN-HODGES-Vladimir-Putins-anti-vaxxers-trying-use-Covid-kill-us.html Edited December 8, 2020 by Macnamara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted December 8, 2020 Author Share Posted December 8, 2020 A government review of human rights? Is that to look into how they can change the law to make it possible to impose mandatory vaccines? Government launches independent review of the Human Rights Act A panel of experts will examine whether there is a need to reform the Human Rights Act in an independent review launched by the government today (7 December 2020). Published 7 December 2020 From: Ministry of Justice expert panel will examine how the Human Rights Act (HRA) is operating 20 years on review expected to report its recommendations in Summer 2021 The review will be led by former Court of Appeal Judge, Sir Peter Gross, and will consider if the HRA needs updating after 2 decades of being in force. As promised in the Manifesto, it will take a fresh look at the Act – how it operates and protects human rights – to ensure it continues to meet the needs of the society it serves. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-launches-independent-review-of-the-human-rights-act Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted December 8, 2020 Author Share Posted December 8, 2020 (edited) Your easy to use guide to the Covid Pseudo Pandemic (please share around) Below are seventeen short excerpts from newspapers, medical journals and websites to illustrate several key points: -the PCR test which was used to justify the lockdowns is not fit for purpose -the lockdowns are not justified -the vaccine is not justified nor safe nor will it take things back to normal and possibly causes infertility and a dangerous and potentially fatal immune response Normality only resumes when people stop complying Contents Please take a moment to read over the contents Boris admits that the Pfizer jab won't end the lockdowns Government admits that the vaccine is not 100% safe Patrick Vallance admits that the vaccine roll out won't end mask wearing, lockdowns or coronavirus Pfizer CEO warns that he is 'not certain' that the vaccine will stop the transmission of the virus Government report warns that the lockdowns could kill 75,000 people over five years Government document admits it is unknown if the Covid vaccine will cause infertility The British Medical Journal warn that the government are suppressing science to rush through the vaccines MHRA regulator is not 'independent' as was funded 980,000 by Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in 2017 Public health England document admits that their PCR test does NOT test for infectious viruses A global team of experts finds flaws with the PCR tests which have been driving the lockdowns A Portuguese court rules that the PCR tests are not fit for purpose Dr Hotez testifies that the mRNA vaccine technology killed test subjects Previous experiments using mRNA vaccines caused 'immune enhancement' in the test subjects leading to their deaths The British Medical Journal warns that the vaccine trials can't tell if the vaccines will reduce deaths Ex Pfizer scientist warns that the Pfizer vaccine may cause infertility or death Ex Pfizer scientist says the second wave does not exist Over 35,000 scientists and Doctors sign the Great Barrington Declaration saying that only the vulnerable should have been quarantine see next post for the excerpts Edited December 8, 2020 by Macnamara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted December 8, 2020 Author Share Posted December 8, 2020 (edited) 1. Boris Johnson warns Pfizer jab 'WON'T deliver knock-out blow' needed to end lockdown as 50 rebel Tory MPs say PM must not 'use vaccine as excuse to keep England closed for even longer' and country prepares for 'FOUR-tier system from December 2' The premier said science had given the country 'two big boxing gloves' via a possible vaccine and mass testing, but added: 'Neither of them is capable of delivering a knock out blow on its own. The pointed comments came amid signs whole regions of England could be kept under brutal restrictions after the blanket lockdown ends on December 2. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8936191/Government-considers-changing-anti-Covid-tier-December-2.ht 2. Coronavirus vaccine will be 'as safe as it can be' but scientist will admit there is no 100% guarantee in honesty-first fight against anti-vaxxers Department of Health and Cabinet Office created task force to promote vaccine Team will advertise jab on social media and TV but acknowledge it is not flawless A source told The Times: 'No clinician would ever say any vaccine is 100% safe' It follows revelations that GPs could offer vaccine on Christmas and Boxing Day By Katie Weston For Mailonline Published: 08:45, 7 November 2020 | Updated: 09:08, 7 November 2020 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8923645/Covid-19-vaccine-campaign-admit-jab-NOT-100-cent-safe-honesty-approach.html 3.Sir Patrick Vallance warns Brits could still be wearing face masks NEXT winter because it will 'take quite a long time' to vaccinate everyone and jabs might not stop the virus spreading The chief scientific adviser said people must still follow social distancing rules No proof that vaccination will stop people transmitting the coronavirus Studies have only proven so far that jabs can prevent Covid-19 disease Britain today became the first country in the world to vaccinate citizens By Sam Blanchard Senior Health Reporter For Mailonline Published: 12:33, 8 December 2020 | Updated: 13:49, 8 December 2020 Britons might still have to wear face masks next winter, Sir Patrick Vallance said today. The chief scientific adviser said the precaution – new to the UK but standard practice in some Asian countries – could be a long-term fix if coronavirus keeps circulating. Britain today became the first country in the world to start vaccinating citizens against Covid-19, but scientists still don't know whether the jab can stop people spreading the virus.Trials proved that it can prevent the Covid-19 illness, at least temporarily, but only time will tell whether it stops people picking up the virus and giving it to others. Sir Patrick said it would 'take quite a long time' to get the vaccine to everybody in the UK and other top scientists say the virus could become seasonal like the flu. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9030263/Brits-wearing-face-masks-winter-Patrick-Vallance-warns.html 4.Pfizer CEO ‘not certain’ their vaccine stops transmission of Covid-19 as company’s jab approved in UK and evaluated in US 4 Dec, 2020 04:36 / Updated 6 hours ago The top executive at pharma giant Pfizer said it still isn’t clear if those who receive the company’s vaccine will be able transmit the coronavirus to others, just one day after the UK became the first to approve the inoculation. While Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla said he expects the vaccine rollout to be rapid after it gets the green light from US health officials, following in the steps of Britain, he noted that it remains to be seen whether recipients of the jab can still carry and pass the virus. “Even though I’ve had the protection, am I still able to transmit it to other people?” NBC’s Lester Holt asked in an interview on Thursday night, prompting a startling response from Bourla: ''I think this is something that needs to be examined. We are not certain about that right now.'' https://www.rt.com/news/508636-pfizer-vaccine-transmission-covid/ 5. Lockdown 'could kill 75,000 over five years' - that's the OFFICIAL projection of non-COVID deaths caused by missed cancer diagnoses, cancelled operations and health impacts of a recession. The virus death toll? 42,000 By Ben Spencer and Simon Walters for the Daily Mail Published: 22:00, 25 September 2020 | Updated: 08:11, 26 September 2020 Nearly 75,000 people could die from non-Covid causes as a result of lockdown, according to devastating official figures buried in a 188-page document. The startling research, presented to the Government's Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage), will further increase pressure on Boris Johnson to hold back on introducing further coronavirus restrictions. The document reveals 16,000 people died as a result of the chaos in hospitals and care homes in March and April alone. It estimates a further 26,000 will lose their lives within a year if people continue to stay away from A&E and the problems in social care persist. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...rojection.html 6. 7. Covid-19: politicisation, “corruption,” and suppression of science BMJ 2020; 371 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m4425 (Published 13 November 2020) Cite this as: BMJ 2020;371:m4425 When good science is suppressed by the medical-political complex, people die Politicians and governments are suppressing science. They do so in the public interest, they say, to accelerate availability of diagnostics and treatments. They do so to support innovation, to bring products to market at unprecedented speed. Both of these reasons are partly plausible; the greatest deceptions are founded in a grain of truth. But the underlying behaviour is troubling. Science is being suppressed for political and financial gain. Covid-19 has unleashed state corruption on a grand scale, and it is harmful to public health.1 Politicians and industry are responsible for this opportunistic embezzlement. So too are scientists and health experts. The pandemic has revealed how the medical-political complex can be manipulated in an emergency—a time when it is even more important to safeguard science. The UK’s pandemic response provides at least four examples of suppression of science or scientists. https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425 8. Press release MHRA awarded over £980,000 for collaboration with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the World Health Organisation MHRA today announced a partnership worth over £980,000 to improve the safety monitoring of medicines in low and middle-income countries. Published 15 December 2017 From: Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency https://www.gov.uk/government/news/mhra-awarded-over-980000-for-collaboration-with-the-bill-and-melinda-gates-foundation-and-the-world-health-organisation 9. Public health England document admits that their PCR test does NOT test for infectious viruses: 10. A global team of experts has found 10 FATAL FLAWS in the main test for Covid and is demanding it’s urgently axed. As they should 1 Dec, 2020 18:59 Among the fatal flaws that totally invalidate the PCR testing protocol are that the test: is non-specific, due to erroneous primer design is enormously variable cannot discriminate between the whole virus and viral fragments has no positive or negative controls has no standard operating procedure does not seem to have been properly peer reviewed https://www.rt.com/op-ed/508383-fatal-flaws-covid-test/ 11. Portuguese Court Rules PCR Tests As Unreliable & Unlawful To Quarantine People November 18, 2020 A Portuguese appeals court has ruled that PCR tests are unreliable and that it is unlawful to quarantine people based solely on a PCR test. The court stated, the test’s reliability depends on the number of cycles used and the viral load present. Citing Jaafar et al. 2020, the court concludes that “if someone is tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the rule in most laboratories in Europe and the US), the probability that said person is infected is less than 3%, and the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%.” The court further notes that the cycle threshold used for the PCR tests currently being made in Portugal is unknown. The threshold cycles used in PCR tests in India is between 37 and 40, which makes the reliability of the PCR test less than 3% and the false positive rate as high as 97%. https://greatgameindia.com/portuguese-court-pcr-tests-unreliable/ 12. Dr. Peter Hotez Addressing House Science, Space, and Technology Committee Hearing on Coronavirus March 5, 2020 Excerpt: "When I say scientific challenge, one of the things we are not hearing a lot about is potential safety problems of coronavirus vaccines. This was first found in the 1960s with respiratory interstitial virus vaccines done in Washington with the NIH and Children's National Medical Center. Some of those kids who got the vaccine did worse and I believe there were two deaths. What happens with certain types of respiratory virus vaccine, to get immunized and when you are exposed to the virus you get this paradoxical enhancement phenomenon. We don't entirely understand the basis of it, that we recognize there's a real problem with certain respiratory virus vaccines. That killed the program for decades and now the Gates foundation is taking it up again, but then we start developing coronavirus vaccines. We noticed laboratory animals that they started to show some of the same pathology that resembled what it happened years earlier. This is going to be problematic..." 13. Immune Enhancement Studies have suggested that coronavirus vaccines carry the risk of what is known as vaccine enhancement, where instead of protecting against infection, the vaccine can actually make the disease worse when a vaccinated person is infected with the virus. The mechanism that causes that risk is not fully understood and is one of the stumbling blocks that has prevented the successful development of a coronavirus vaccine. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-vaccines-insight-idUSKBN20Y1GZ 14. BMJ Sounds the Alarm: COVID-19 Vaccine Trials Cannot Tell Us if They Will Save Lives By BMJ October 21, 2020 None of the current trials are designed to detect a reduction in any serious outcome such as hospitalizations, intensive care use, or deaths. Vaccines are being hailed as the solution to the covid-19 pandemic, but the vaccine trials currently underway are not designed to tell us if they will save lives, reports Peter Doshi, Associate Editor at The BMJ today. https://scitechdaily.com/bmj-sounds-the-alarm-covid-19-vaccine-trials-cannot-tell-us-if-they-will-save-lives/ 15. Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon request a stop of all corona vaccination studies and call for co-signing the petition December 1, 2020 The concerns are directed in particular to the following points: The formation of so-called “non-neutralizing antibodies” can lead to an exaggerated immune reaction, especially when the test person is confronted with the real, “wild” virus after vaccination. This so-called antibody-dependent amplification, ADE, has long been known from experiments with corona vaccines in cats, for example. In the course of these studies all cats that initially tolerated the vaccination well died after catching the wild virus. The vaccinations are expected to produce antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. However, spike proteins also contain syncytin-homologous proteins, which are essential for the formation of the placenta in mammals such as humans. It must be absolutely ruled out that a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 could trigger an immune reaction against syncytin-1, as otherwise infertility of indefinite duration could result in vaccinated women. https://2020news.de/en/dr-wodarg-and-dr-yeadon-request-a-stop-of-all-corona-vaccination-studies-and-call-for-co-signing-the-petition/ 16. Former Chief Science Officer for Pfizer Says "Second Wave" Faked on False-Positive COVID Tests, "Pandemic is Over" Updated on September 29, 2020 Ralph Lopez In a stunning development, a former Chief Science Officer for the pharmaceutical giant Pfizer says "there is no science to suggest a second wave should happen." The "Big Pharma" insider asserts that false positive results from inherently unreliable COVID tests are being used to manufacture a "second wave" based on "new cases." Dr. Mike Yeadon, a former Vice President and Chief Science Officer for Pfizer for 16 years, says that half or even "almost all" of tests for COVID are false positives. Dr. Yeadon also argues that the threshold for herd immunity may be much lower than previously thought, and may have been reached in many countries already. In an interview last week Dr. Yeadon was asked: "we are basing a government policy, an economic policy, a civil liberties policy, in terms of limiting people to six people in a meeting...all based on, what may well be, completely fake data on this coronavirus?" Dr. Yeadon answered with a simple "yes." Even more significantly, even if all positives were to be correct, Dr. Yeadon said that given the "shape" of all important indicators in a worldwide pandemic, such as hospitalizations, ICU utilization, and deaths, "the pandemic is fundamentally over." Yeadon said in the interview: "Were it not for the test data that you get from the TV all the time, you would rightly conclude that the pandemic was over, as nothing much has happened. Of course people go to the hospital, moving into the autumn flu season...but there is no science to suggest a second wave should happen." Survival Rate of COVID Now Estimated to be 99.8%, Similar to Flu, Prior T-Cell Immunity The survival rate of COVID-19 has been upgraded since May to 99.8% of infections. This comes close to ordinary flu, the survival rate of which is 99.9%. Although COVID can have serious after-effects, so can flu or any respiratory illness. The present survival rate is far higher than initial grim guesses in March and April, cited by Dr. Anthony Fauci, of 94%, or 20 to 30 times deadlier. The Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) value accepted by Yeadon et al in the paper is .26%. The survival rate of a disease is 100% minus the IFR. Dr. Yeadon pointed out that the "novel" COVID-19 contagion is novel only in the sense that it is a new type of coronavirus. But, he said, there are presently four strains which circulate freely throughout the population, most often linked to the common cold. https://hubpages.com/politics/Pfizer-Chief-Science-Officer-Second-Wave-Based-on-Fake-Data-of-False-Positives-for-New-Cases-Pandemic-is-Over 17. The Great Barrington Declaration The Great Barrington Declaration – As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection. Coming from both the left and right, and around the world, we have devoted our careers to protecting people. Current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health. The results (to name a few) include lower childhood vaccination rates, worsening cardiovascular disease outcomes, fewer cancer screenings and deteriorating mental health – leading to greater excess mortality in years to come, with the working class and younger members of society carrying the heaviest burden. Keeping students out of school is a grave injustice. Keeping these measures in place until a vaccine is available will cause irreparable damage, with the underprivileged disproportionately harmed. Fortunately, our understanding of the virus is growing. We know that vulnerability to death from COVID-19 is more than a thousand-fold higher in the old and infirm than the young. Indeed, for children, COVID-19 is less dangerous than many other harms, including influenza. As immunity builds in the population, the risk of infection to all – including the vulnerable – falls. We know that all populations will eventually reach herd immunity – i.e. the point at which the rate of new infections is stable – and that this can be assisted by (but is not dependent upon) a vaccine. Our goal should therefore be to minimize mortality and social harm until we reach herd immunity. The most compassionate approach that balances the risks and benefits of reaching herd immunity, is to allow those who are at minimal risk of death to live their lives normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest risk. We call this Focused Protection. On October 4, 2020, this declaration was authored and signed in Great Barrington, United States, by: Dr. Martin Kulldorff, professor of medicine at Harvard University, a biostatistician, and epidemiologist with expertise in detecting and monitoring infectious disease outbreaks and vaccine safety evaluations. Dr. Sunetra Gupta, professor at Oxford University, an epidemiologist with expertise in immunology, vaccine development, and mathematical modeling of infectious diseases. Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, professor at Stanford University Medical School, a physician, epidemiologist, health economist, and public health policy expert focusing on infectious diseases and vulnerable populations. https://gbdeclaration.org/ Edited December 8, 2020 by Macnamara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted December 9, 2020 Author Share Posted December 9, 2020 The warning signs continue... 4 volunteers develop FACIAL PARALYSIS after taking Pfizer Covid-19 jab, prompting FDA to recommend ‘surveillance for cases’ 9 Dec, 2020 08:17 / Updated 8 hours ago Four trial participants who received the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine experienced facial paralysis, according to the Food and Drug Administration. The FDA said the issue should be monitored as the jab becomes more widely available. The potentially concerning cases were revealed after the US drug regulator published an analysis of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine ahead of a meeting to consider emergency use authorization for the jab in the United States. According to the documents, Bell’s palsy, a form of temporary facial paralysis, was reported by four participants during phase 3 trials. The individuals had been administered the jab, and no members of the placebo group experienced similar adverse effects. https://www.rt.com/usa/509081-pfizer-vaccine-fda-bells-palsy-covid/ Calls for calm over Pfizer vaccine roll-out after two NHS staff suffer 'anaphylactoid reaction': Scientists urge public not to panic after regulators warn people with history of 'significant' allergies NOT to have jab Both the people are recovering following the first day of the mass vaccination programme, it is understood In the US vaccine trial carried out by Pfizer, 137 out of around 19,000 people given vaccine had a reaction The NHS in England said that all the trusts involved with the vaccination programme have been informed MHRA has given advice anyone who has a history of 'significant' allergic reactions should not get the vaccine Yesterday the NHS embarked on its colossal plan to vaccinate the entire UK population against coronavirus Dr June Raine, chief executive of MHRA, told MPs today there had been two allergic reactions to the jab Have you or someone you know suffered a reaction to the jab? Email [email protected] By James Gant and Martin Robinson Chief Reporter and Jack Wright For Mailonline Published: 09:56, 9 December 2020 | Updated: 18:57, 9 December 2020 British scientists today attempted to quash public panic about the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine which is currently being rolled-out across the country, following reports that two NHS staff suffered an 'anaphylactoid reaction' just after being immunised on V-Day yesterday. Within 24 hours of the biggest-ever mass vaccination programme in British history, the UK's drug regulator told anyone with a serious allergy to medicines or food was told not to have the much-vaunted jab. The number of people set to be barred is not known, though up to seven million people in the country have allergies severe enough to require medical care, according to the NHS – while around 250,000 people need to carry an EpiPen at all times. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9034115/Allergy-risk-Pfizer-jab-TWO-patients-fall-ill-V-Day-rollout.html FDA: Six people die during Pfizer vaccine trial By Manish Saini December 8, 2020 Half of those killed were over 55 years old. Two people died in the vaccinated group, four in the placebo group. Two people who received the COVID-19 vaccine from the Pfizer and Biontech died after being inoculated, according to documents from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). https://www.revyuh.com/top-news/featured/fda-six-people-die-during-pfizer-vaccine-trial/ Meanwhile we are left wondering what exactly was stolen? Was it evidence relating to the paper that Dr Hodarg sent into the EU warning about the dangers of the vaccines? Cyberattack hits EU medicines agency, prompting fears vaccine data has been stolen just weeks before two new jabs are due to be approved European Medicines Agency announced it had been attacked on Wednesday The agency is currently weighing up special approval on several vaccines It is not clear when or exactly how the attack took place or who did it By Isabella Nikolic For Mailonline Published: 15:40, 9 December 2020 | Updated: 17:32, 9 December 2020 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9035357/Cyberattack-hits-EU-medicines-agency.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted December 9, 2020 Author Share Posted December 9, 2020 On 12/8/2020 at 2:50 AM, Macnamara said: The crown is not britain and yet you are one of those people who wrongly conflates the crown with britain. The crown is just a kabbalistic parasite that sits on the top of the british people hoovering up their wealth and energy. Indeed the sphere at the top of the kabbalist tree of life is known as 'kether', the crown. That crown is currently working against the british people and is trying to push a bioweapon in the form of a covid 'vaccine' on the british people. GOVERNMENT UK LIMITED - 05522373 - Application to Strike off on Companies House - DS01 Bruce Lamb made this Freedom of Information request to Cabinet Office Bruce Lamb 7 December 2020 Delivered Dear Cabinet Office, We have noted a request to strike off GOVERNMENT UK LIMITED - 05522373. It states within the filing history 7th October 2020 https://find-and-update.company-informat... the following within the section Important notice for all interested parties. This company has applied to be struck off and dissolved. The registrar will process unless there is reasonable cause not to, and on dissolution any assets remaining in the company will be passed to the Crown. Guidance is available on grounds for objection. If in doubt seek professional advice. Please answer the following questions in context of the afore mentioned company. 1. Please advise on the full inventory of assets without any exceptions that are held within or connected to GOVERNMENT UK LIMITED No: 05522373 or any linked companies. 2. If assets are listed are they not owned by the Sovereign people of the United Kingdom, England, Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland and Islands linked to this nation. 3. Please advise which Corporation (Name) and its Company House ID (number) the UKs asset base resides. 4. Is not the Crown, the Crown Corporation? Operating from The City of London a different country to The United Kingdom? Any information relating to why this is taking place or should it be linked with a BREXIT strategy would be thankfully received. Further questions may follow based on your responses. We have lodged an email with Companies House, receipted NUM1851591X and copied to UK Police Chief Constables given the current state of the economy and knowledge held with respect to the root cause as this could be perceived as asset theft should the UK's asset base be subjected to transfer to a third party through a paper exercise. The final wealth of this nation is in its asset base, land, buildings, contracts etc. Should this be sold, transferred or assigned away from the people then what i discussed with APPG Banking on 16.10.18 in Portcullis House, Westminster is in its final phases. MP Mike Kane, Heather Buchanan, APPG Banking Exec Director and James Ventress APPG Banking present as witnesses. I had tabled evidence of economic terrorism and asset theft that lead to Kevin Hollinrake MP asking me to speak with Heather Buchanan and Mike Kane MP. As a result Mike Kane did NOT ask the questions of John Glen - Treasury Minister that identified economic destruction of the UK. Hence we are in the position we are in now. Many thanks in anticipation of a speedy response. Yours faithfully, bruce-robert: lamb https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/government_uk_limited_05522373_a Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted December 9, 2020 Author Share Posted December 9, 2020 (edited) A riposte to the creatures in the WHO: Scientists Question Safety of Vaccines (WHO Global Vaccine Safety Summit December 2019) 0.29 seconds ''without good science we can't have good communication'' If you don't have the 'science' then why are you rolling out vaccines on a massive scale? 0.58 seconds ''we really don't have good safety monitoring systems'' If you don't have good safety monitoring systems then how can you assess if the vaccines are safe or not? 1 minute 10 seconds ''we are not able to give clear cut answers about the deaths that have occurred with particular vaccines'' If your vaccines are killing people and you can't understand why then why are you using them? 1 minute 20 seconds ''there is some obfuscation at that level'' If you are about 'science' then why would you hide anything? Surely you should lay all the facts on the table so that science can be more accurate. By failing to do that you are anti-science 1.57 ''how do we build confidence in this?'' If you have identified that the ADJUVANTS eg aluminium are toxic to health then the question is not how you get people to maintain confidence in a toxic product the question is how you make your product non toxic or you remove it from the market altogether. Why would you look to build confidence in a product that you know is causing harm? 2 minutes 50 seconds ''[adjuvants] multiply the reactogenicity, in many instances, and therefore it seems to me that it is not unexpected if they multiply the incidence of adverse reactions that are associated with the antigen, but may not have been detected through lack of statistical power in the original studies'' If your studies lack the necessary data to identify the risks involved in your vaccine then how can you then make an accurate cost to benefit analysis? If they are causing adverse reactions and you don't fully understand why then why are you not pulling the products off the market and why did you use them in the first place? 3.20 you say you see local reactogenicity immediately after the vaccine is applied and therefore accept those as vaccine induced adverse reactions and yet sound dismissive of more long term effects which you describe as 'accusations'; that smacks of criminally negligent irresponsibility to me 5.07 ''better mechanistic understandings of how these things work'' if you don't understand the mechanisms of your own vaccines then why would you ever inject them not a live human being as you can't be sure what impact that will have on them? You are essentially using people as your guinea pigs 5.18 ''if you struggle with the length of follow up'' So you are admitting that you do not look at the long term impacts on the people you vaccinate 5.35 ''its also the subject population that you administer the adjuvant to...'' Yes that is why applying a one size fits all approach to medicine is deeply flawed and dangerous and criminally irresponsible 6.18 ''a child is being given different antigens from different companies, and these vaccines have different adjuvants and preservatives and so on....something crosses my mind...is there a possibility of these adjuvants, preservatives cross-reacting amongst themselves?'' Yes of course there is. There is also the possibility that vaccine ingredients could react synergistically with other environmental factors such as fluoride, glyphosate and even microwaves, so you have to ask yourself why this doesn't 'cross the mind' of the scientists who make the vaccines and the doctors who administer them? Are they retards or criminals? 6.36 ''has there ever been a study on the possibility of cross-reactions?'' from 6.48 Dr Chen then goes on to admit that they lack that data and want to give people barcodes which is an admission that upto now they haven't studied the possibility of cross-reactivity and also that even if they create barcodes and use them to look into that the people who are vaccinated during that time will still not have the protection of the knowledge of those studies and will be guinea pigs demonstrating that they are knowingly flying blind 7.40 Dr Chen welcomes the emergence of 'large data sets' which means large amounts of people who are acting as guinea pigs 8.47 ''in medical school you are lucky if you have a half day on vaccines'' If doctors are lucky to have a half day on vaccines then isn't it about time that we stopped referring to them as 'experts' on the subject of vaccines? I have had more than a half day on vaccines therefore i am more of an expert on vaccines than the GP's who are so eager to inject them into our children Edited December 9, 2020 by Macnamara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted December 10, 2020 Author Share Posted December 10, 2020 Deaths spiked AFTER the lockdowns were imposed: Questions for Lockdown Apologists Published on December 8, 2020 Written by John Pospichal https://principia-scientific.com/questions-for-lockdown-apologists/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zArk Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 Just now, Macnamara said: Deaths spiked AFTER the lockdowns were imposed: Questions for Lockdown Apologists Published on December 8, 2020 Written by John Pospichal https://principia-scientific.com/questions-for-lockdown-apologists/ i think they run on a 3 week cycle from 'cases' to deaths .. this will be their response but its odd how UK count a covid death 28 days from a positive test they spoke of the 3 week delay back in March. but i have said before this is vaccine science ... infections directly linked proportionally to deaths normal science shows that infections do not equate to deaths , they are separate so ... pre-vaccine society is being cajoled into believing the natural state is infections = deaths ... ready for the vaccinated population to then actually prove their false paradigm. its all soooooo fucked up 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted December 11, 2020 Author Share Posted December 11, 2020 (edited) Why are there police in a private company pursuing the public? Because they are crown privateers matey, there to loot the public Edited December 11, 2020 by Macnamara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted December 11, 2020 Author Share Posted December 11, 2020 On 10/22/2020 at 10:40 PM, Macnamara said: Cure worse than disease? Some Covid-19 vaccines may increase HIV risk, scientists warn 22 Oct, 2020 10:59 A group of researchers in the US is sounding the alarm over several coronavirus vaccines currently undergoing clinical trials, warning that they may increase the risk of contracting HIV in subjects who take them. “We are concerned that use of an Ad5 vector for immunisation against SARS-CoV-2 could similarly increase the risk of HIV-1 acquisition among men who receive the vaccine,” they wrote. https://www.rt.com/news/504224-covid19-vaccine-candidates-hiv/ not unexpected at all if you've been paying attention... Unexpected side effect? Australia scraps Covid-19 vaccine development after trials lead to false positives for HIV 11 Dec, 2020 07:31 Australia has abandoned the development of a domestically-made coronavirus vaccine after participants in clinical trials for the jab returned false positive test results for HIV. The drug, created by the University of Queensland (UQ) and biotech firm CSL, triggered a “robust” immune response to SARS-COV-2 in phase 1 trials, but it also led to some unfortunate complications involving another dangerous virus. Antibodies that were shielding participants from a Covid-19 infection were also leading to false positives on HIV tests. Although no trial participant had actually contracted HIV, Australia’s Health Minister Greg Hunt acknowledged that the bizarre side-effect interferes with HIV screening. There is no known cure for the virus, which attacks the immune system, and if left untreated HIV can lead to AIDS. According to the vaccine’s developers, the problem could take a year to troubleshoot. The setback has prompted CSL and the Australian government to cancel phase 2 and phase 3 trials. https://www.rt.com/news/509312-australia-coronavirus-vaccine-hiv-test/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted December 12, 2020 Author Share Posted December 12, 2020 On 10/13/2020 at 9:23 PM, Macnamara said: Corporate socialism And what is corporate socialism? Corporate socialism is not merely government bailouts for corporations. It is a two-tiered system of ‘actually-existing socialism’ on the ground, paralleled by a set of corporate monopolies on top. (‘Actually-existing socialism’ is a pejorative term used mostly by dissidents in socialist countries to refer to what life was really like under socialism, rather than in the perfidious books of Marx and his epigones.) Wealth for the few, ‘economic equality’ under reduced conditions for the many – corporate socialism is a form of neo-feudalism. In Wall Street and FDR, historian Anthony C Sutton described corporate socialism, as developed in the 19thth century, and distinguished it from state socialism, as follows: “[The] robber baron schema is also, under different labels, the socialist plan. The difference between a corporate state monopoly and a socialist state monopoly is essentially only the identity of the group controlling the power structure. The essence of socialism is monopoly control by the state using hired planners and academic sponges. On the other hand, Rockefeller, Morgan, and their corporate friends aimed to acquire and control their monopoly and to maximize its profits through influence in the state political apparatus; this, while it still needs hired planners and academic sponges, is a discreet and far more subtle process than outright state ownership under socialism…We call this phenomenon of corporate legal monopoly – market control acquired by using political influence – by the name of corporate socialism.” What Sutton calls corporate socialism might otherwise be called ‘corporate-run socialism’ or ‘socialist capitalism’. Why has the UK handed the world's new most powerful weapon to China? Ultracold quantum matter research at Oxford that could create unhackable communications and radar to find submarines is shared with Chinese military university A laboratory at Oxford has nurtured crucial link with Chinese military university To the horror of our politicians and security services, we passed on knowledge It's classic example of China subtly exploiting naivety of Western democracies By David Rose For The Daily Mail Published: 22:04, 11 December 2020 | Updated: 12:14, 12 December 2020 They call it ultracold quantum technology, and it will change the world. It’s a mind-boggling new field of science that is at once hugely exciting and – as we shall see – utterly alarming. It will change everything we know about computing and ultimately render all devices currently in use obsolete. As well as myriad practical applications that will change our lives, it is likely to transform warfare, with unhackable communications, precision weapons guidance systems, and radar so sensitive it will detect both enemy stealth bombers and distant submarines. As Bill Phillips, Nobel Prize winning physicist, puts it: ‘A quantum computer is as different from a classical computer as a classical computer is from an abacus.’ It’s why any nation that possesses its secrets would be insane to share it with a potential foe – especially one that is hell-bent on dominating the globe, and has the resources to do it. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9044843/Why-UK-handed-worlds-new-powerful-weapon-China.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted December 13, 2020 Author Share Posted December 13, 2020 On 12/12/2020 at 1:48 PM, Macnamara said: Why has the UK handed the world's new most powerful weapon to China? Ultracold quantum matter research at Oxford that could create unhackable communications and radar to find submarines is shared with Chinese military university the crown knows this is going on. they havent just suddenly dropped the ball! Leaked files expose mass infiltration of UK firms by Chinese Communist Party including AstraZeneca, Rolls Royce, HSBC and Jaguar Land Rover Loyal members of Chinese Communist Party are working in British consulates, universities and for some of the UK's leading companies, The Mail on Sunday can reveal Leaked database of 1.95m registered party members reveals how Beijing's malign influence now stretches into almost every corner of British life, including defence firms, banks and pharmaceutical giants Some members, who swear oath to 'guard Party secrets, be loyal to the Party, work hard, fight for communism throughout my life...and never betray the Party', are understood to have jobs in British consulates By Jake Ryan and Jonathan Bucks and Holly Bancroft For The Mail On Sunday Published: 22:38, 12 December 2020 | Updated: 04:26, 13 December 2020 Loyal members of the Chinese Communist Party are working in British consulates, universities and for some of the UK's leading companies, The Mail on Sunday can reveal. An extraordinary leaked database of 1.95 million registered party members reveals how Beijing's malign influence now stretches into almost every corner of British life, including defence firms, banks and pharmaceutical giants. Loyal members of the Chinese Communist Party are working in British consulates, universities and for some of the UK's leading companies, The Mail on Sunday can reveal. An extraordinary leaked database of 1.95 million registered party members reveals how Beijing's malign influence now stretches into almost every corner of British life, including defence firms, banks and pharmaceutical giants. (Pictured above, front, President Xi Jinping at a CCP session) The database was originally leaked on Telegram, the encrypted instant messaging app, and passed in September by a Chinese dissident to the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China, which comprises more than 150 legislators around the world who are concerned by the influence and activities of the Chinese government. Detailed analysis by MoS of the material reveals that pharmaceutical giants Pfizer and AstraZeneca – both involved in the development of coronavirus vaccines – employed a total 123 party loyalists https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9046783/Leaked-files-expose-mass-infiltration-UK-firms-Chinese-Communist-Party.html 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted December 14, 2020 Author Share Posted December 14, 2020 On 11/8/2020 at 4:25 PM, Macnamara said: Molecular Mimicry—Understanding the Link between Vaccines and Autoimmune Disease March 20, 2018 By the World Mercury Project Team Autoimmune diseases have become increasingly common in the United States and other high-income countries over the past several decades and now affect an estimated 5%-10% of the population in those countries.....when the body’s immune responses get misdirected against itself. The pathogenic hallmark of autoimmune disease is the production of proteins called autoantibodies, whereby the immune system mistakenly attacks the body’s own organs, tissues and cells instead of fighting external pathogens. Vaccines can prompt autoantibody production through a mechanism called “molecular mimicry.” The Key to Covid The key to unlocking covid is to understand that the flu vaccinations have been causing the production of autoantibodies through molecular mimickry and these are then causing peoples immune responses to misdirect against them. This piece below from the daily mail speaks about a study that has found these autoantibodies in people with covid 19 symptoms. It is the vaccines themselves which are causing covid: 'Autoantibodies' make some people more likely to suffer severe coronavirus symptoms and cause 'long Covid', scientists say People with coronavirus have high numbers of 'autoantibodies' in their blood Block body's Covid-tackling antibodies and attack several areas, including brain Could account for why some Covid sufferers experience long-lasting symptoms By Jemma Carr For Mailonline Published: 20:53, 13 December 2020 | Updated: 22:50, 13 December 2020 Extreme levels of 'friendly fire' antibodies in the immune system could trigger severe coronavirus symptoms and cause 'long Covid', scientists say. Coronavirus patients have high numbers of 'autoantibodies' in their blood which block the body's Covid-tackling antibodies and attack several areas, including the brain, blood vessels and liver. This could account for why some Covid sufferers experience long-lasting symptoms - such as fatigue, breathlessness and brain problems, a study found. Researchers at Yale University counted the number of 'autoantibodies' in the blood of 194 hospital workers and patients with Covid - compared to 30 healthy staff members. They found that non-infected people had far fewer autoantibodies than those who had the virus. Another set of tests discovered that people with more autoantibodies - which attack the same organs known to be damaged in Covid sufferers - experienced worse Covid-19 symptoms. Scientists fear the negative effects of the 'friendly fire' could continue for an extended period of time, causing long Covid. Yale immunobiologist and the study's senior author Aaron Ring told The Guardian: 'Covid-19 patients make autoantibodies that actually interfere with immune responses against the virus. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9049201/Extreme-levels-friendly-fire-bodys-immune-cause-long-Covid.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted December 15, 2020 Author Share Posted December 15, 2020 VACCINATED VS. UNVACCINATED STUDY PUBLISHED 12/6/2020 Thorough and careful analysis of 10.5 years of unvaccinated and variably vaccinated pediatric patients from a practice in Oregon has led to a peer-reviewed publication. Importantly, the study results point to major differences in the health outcomes of vaccinated and the unvaccinated patients consistent with other independently conducted studies. The article, entitled "Relative Incidence of Office Visits and Cumulative Rates of Billed Diagnoses Along the Axis of Vaccination" was reviewed by three anonymous reviewers selected by the journal. "This study represents a major methodological leap forward in vaccine satety studies" says Dr. James Lyons-Weiler, who designed the study. "Our study shows how often vaccinating patients have to repeated instances of medical care for conditions suspected by many as potential caused by vaccines. Our measure, the Relative Incidence of Office Visits (RIOV), is sensitive to the severity of disease and disorder - specifically the disease burden. While teasing out causality is difficult in observational studies, our use of natural internal positive and negative control conditions - fever, which is known to be caused by vaccines, and well-baby visits, which is not caused by vaccines - provide added assurance that we are seeing a likely causal signatures". The study includes results of a simulation that demonstrates that RIOV is more powerful than odds ratios of diagnosis. In fact, the incidence of a condition is equivalent to "one billed office visit per condition", meaning past studies will likely have missed safety signals due to the method of data analysis chosen. This study provides a measure that is more powerful, and has a larger dynamic range. RIOV is more senstivity and clearly able to pick up safety signals missed by past studies that only looked at incidence, The study was funded by donation from the public to IPAK, The Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge. Study link: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/22/8674 Phase 2 of this study will focus on additional analyses such as the relative risk of disease burden due to aluminum vs. non-aluminum vaccines, live attenuated virus vs. killed virus vaccines, and, at the recommendation of one anonymous reviewer, analyses designed to measure temporal association between specific vaccines and specific health outcomes. To help fund Phase 2, visit this link. or click the Donate Button below. http://ipaknowledge.org/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted December 15, 2020 Author Share Posted December 15, 2020 Analysis of health outcomes in vaccinated and unvaccinated children: Developmental delays, asthma, ear infections and gastrointestinal disorders Brian S Hooker, Neil Z Miller First Published May 27, 2020 Research Article Find in PubMed https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312120925344 Abstract Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the health of vaccinated versus unvaccinated pediatric populations. Methods: Using data from three medical practices in the United States with children born between November 2005 and June 2015, vaccinated children were compared to unvaccinated children during the first year of life for later incidence of developmental delays, asthma, ear infections and gastrointestinal disorders. All diagnoses utilized International Classification of Diseases–9 and International Classification of Diseases–10 codes through medical chart review. Subjects were a minimum of 3 years of age, stratified based on medical practice, year of birth and gender and compared using a logistic regression model. Results: Vaccination before 1 year of age was associated with increased odds of developmental delays (OR = 2.18, 95% CI 1.47–3.24), asthma (OR = 4.49, 95% CI 2.04–9.88) and ear infections (OR = 2.13, 95% CI 1.63–2.78). In a quartile analysis, subjects were grouped by number of vaccine doses received in the first year of life. Higher odds ratios were observed in Quartiles 3 and 4 (where more vaccine doses were received) for all four health conditions considered, as compared to Quartile 1. In a temporal analysis, developmental delays showed a linear increase as the age cut-offs increased from 6 to 12 to 18 to 24 months of age (ORs = 1.95, 2.18, 2.92 and 3.51, respectively). Slightly higher ORs were also observed for all four health conditions when time permitted for a diagnosis was extended from ⩾ 3 years of age to ⩾ 5 years of age. Conclusion: In this study, which only allowed for the calculation of unadjusted observational associations, higher ORs were observed within the vaccinated versus unvaccinated group for developmental delays, asthma and ear infections. Further study is necessary to understand the full spectrum of health effects associated with childhood vaccination. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2050312120925344 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted December 16, 2020 Author Share Posted December 16, 2020 21 hours ago, Macnamara said: Analysis of health outcomes in vaccinated and unvaccinated children Vaccination before 1 year of age was associated with increased odds of......asthma (OR = 4.49, 95% CI 2.04–9.88) Getting 'justice' would have been taking down the manufacturers of the vaccine that created the asthma in the first place; the coronor should have ruled that the childs health had been adversely affected by vaccines leading to her ongoing health problems that culminated in her death: 'We've got the justice she deserved': Mother of nine-year-old girl who died after asthma attack praises coroner's 'seismic' verdict that London air pollution DID cause her death Ella Kissi-Debrah died in February 2013 after suffering numerous seizures She made almost 30 visits to hospital with breathing problems over three years Her mother Rosamund has called for education about risks posed by pollution By Rory Tingle and Katie Feehan For Mailonline Published: 12:09, 16 December 2020 | Updated: 13:10, 16 December 2020 Ella Kissi-Debrah is believed to be the first person in the UK to have air pollution listed as the cause of death on their death certificate, following the ruling by a coroner at a second inquest into her death. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9059387/Coroner-records-air-pollution-exposure-cause-death-time.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted December 16, 2020 Author Share Posted December 16, 2020 (edited) The daily mail has published graphs purporting to show that vaccinations have suppressed or eradicated several diseases: smallpox, measles and polio but lets dig into that a bit....its not hard for people to go out there and test their own suppositions by simply looking beyond the mainstream media, but how many ever do question anything? https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9059077/Fascinating-graphs-reveal-highly-infectious-diseases-wiped-vaccines.html With polio they haven't eradicated it and in fact the WHO is now admitting that their vaccines are causing strains of polio around the world.....below i have also cobbled together a few graphs in only a few minutes of internet searching and there are many more including a lot of information showing that the narratives that vaccinations are what is responsible for improvements in public health are a load of bunk: Vaccine-derived polio spreads in Africa after defeat of wild virus Peter Beaumont Wed 2 Sep 2020 14.11 BST https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2020/sep/02/vaccine-derived-polio-spreads-in-africa-after-defeat-of-wild-virus In the west polio has now just been renamed accute flaccid myelitis: Diptheria going down before vaccines due to improvements in housing, water, sewerage, nutrition and sanitation: Extracts from “LEICESTER: Sanitation versus Vaccination” By J.T. Biggs J.P. SMALLPOX FATALITY RATES, cases in vaccinated and re-vaccinated populations compared with “unprotected” Leicester – 1860 to 1908. Name. Period. Small-Pox. Cases Small-Pox. Deaths. Fatality-rate per cent. of Cases Japan 1886-1908 288,779 77,415 26.8 British Army (United Kingdom) 1860-1908 1,355 96 7.1 British Army (India) 1860-1908 2,753 307 11.1 British Army (Colonies) 1860-1908 934 82 8.8 Royal Navy 1860-1908 2,909 234 8.0 Grand Totals and case fatality rate per cent, over all 296,730 78,134 26.3 Leicester (since giving up vaccination) 1880-1908 1,206 61 5.1 Biggs said “In this comparison, I have given the numbers of revaccinated cases, and deaths, and each fatality-rate separately and together, so that they may be compared either way with Leicester. In pro-vaccinist language, may I ask, if the excessive small-pox fatality of Japan, of the British Army, and of the Royal Navy, are not due to vaccination and revaccination, to what are they due? It would afford an interesting psychical study were we able to know to what heights of eloquent glorification Sir George Buchanan would have soared with a corresponding result—but on the opposite side.“ To Contents TABLE 29. Small-Pox Epidemics, Cost, and Fatality Rates Compared Vaccinal Condition Small-Pox Cases Small-Pox Deaths Fatality-rate Per Cent Cost of Epidemic London 1900-02 Well Vaccinated 9,659 1,594 16.50 £492,000 Glasgow 1900-02 Well Vaccinated 3,417 377 11.03 £ 150,000 Sheffield 1887-88 Well Vaccinated 7,066 688 9.73 £32,257 Leicester 1892-94 Practically Unvaccinated 393 21 5.34 £2,888 Leicester 1902-04 Practically Unvaccinated 731 30 4.10 £1,602 https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/graphs/#Extracts_Leics In addition to the extensive static graphs below, the following superb BBC FOUR broadcast by Professor Hans Rosling shows how health improved in step with wealth over the last 200 years “200 countries over 200 years using 120,000 numbers – in just four minutes“: https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/graphs/#Extracts_Leics Edited December 16, 2020 by Macnamara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted December 17, 2020 Author Share Posted December 17, 2020 Public Health England withholding vaccines results making it impossible to establish if drugs could be harmful Henry Bodkin 15 September 2018 • 8:00pm The failure of England's public healthy body to publish results of three major studies into vaccines for children makes it impossible for experts to establish whether the drugs could be harmful, experts say https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/09/15/health-regulator-withholding-vaccines-results-making-impossible/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted December 17, 2020 Author Share Posted December 17, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.