Jump to content

Cap'n Mac's Pirate Republic!


Recommended Posts

On 12/29/2022 at 12:02 AM, Macnamara said:

False Flag incoming?


In the wake of the shooting of policemen and women in australia there is a fresh push by the police chiefs to demonise anyone who questions the covid scamdemic and who has a distrust of government to be shopped by their neighbours to the police as a potential threat to......well a threat to the official line i suppose or rather a threat to their lies.


So can we expect a similar attack to occur in britain that will be used to demonise 'anti-vaxxers' and 'conspiracy theorists' to try and head off the growing awareness of wrongdoing in high places over the covid scamdemic? Seeing as the public have essentially stopped accepting the covid jabs i think it can be assumed that there is now some pretty widespread distrust of authority.

Aussie Cops Ask Neighbors To Rat Out 'Anti-Government, Anti-Police, Or COVID-Vaccine Conspiracy Theorists'

by Tyler Durden
Wednesday, Dec 28, 2022 - 02:12 PM

Australian police are using a brutal ambush on two cops to encourage residents to rat out neighbors who are skeptical of the Covid-10 vaccine, or harbor anti-government views.

On December 12, two Brisbane police officers were gunned down by a family of rural Australians, who opened fire as the two officers approached their home. Constables Rachel McCrow, 29, and Matthew Arnold, 26 died in the attack, while a third officer, Constable Randall Kirk, was shot in the leg but managed to escape. A fourth officer, Keely Brough, fled to safety in the bushes.

Later that evening, members of the rural family were killed in a shootout with tactical police.

In response to the incident, Deputy Commissioner Tracy Linford suggested that neighbors need to assume anyone who harbors non-mainstream views is clearly a threat.



Conspiracy theorist plotted to firebomb phone, TV and radio masts because he believed Britain was 'controlled by Israel' and Covid vaccine was a 'planned genocide' - as convicted terrorist faces jail

  • Oliver Lewin, 38, planned attacks due to opposing the Tory government 
  • He tried to stir up a movement of individuals on the Telegram messaging site
  • He was found guilty at Birmingham Crown Court and will be sentenced next year 

By Lauren Haughey For Mailonline

Published: 19:44 GMT, 19 December 2022 | Updated: 02:08 GMT, 20 December 2022



  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

CHOSENESS Pt4: Sabbateans behind the democrat mask


Who does antifa really work for?

Biden’s Zionist Chief of Staff Ron Klain replaced by Zionist former ‘Covid’ Czar Jeff Zients – control this position and you control the Biden Regime which also includes Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen (Zionist); Secretary of State Anthony Blinken (Zionist); Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas (Zionist); Attorney General Merrick Garland (Zionist); CDC Director Rochelle Walensky (Zionist) etc., etc.. Jewish population of the United States: 2.2%

Jews in the Biden Administration

Joe Biden was sworn in as the 46th president of the United States on January 20, 2021.

Ron Klain Chief of Staff resigned in 2023, replaced by Jeffrey Zients.
Janet Yellin Secretary of Treasury
Alejandro Mayorkas Secretary of Homeland Security
Tony Blinken Secretary of State
Merrick Garland Attorney General

Jared Bernstein

Council of Economic Advisers
Rochelle Walensky Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Wendy Sherman Deputy Secretary of State
Anne Neuberger Deputy National Security Adviser for Cybersecurity
Jeffrey Zients Chief of Staff, formerly COVID-19 Response Coordinator

David Kessler

Co-chair of the COVID-19 Advisory Board and Head of Operation Warp Speed

David Cohen CIA Deputy Director 
Avril Haines Director of National Intelligence
Rachel Levine Deputy Health Secretary
Jennifer Klein Co-chair Council on Gender Policy
Jessica Rosenworcel Chair of the Federal Communications Commission
Stephanie Pollack Deputy Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration
Polly Trottenberg Deputy Secretary of Transportation
Mira Resnick State Department Deputy Assistant Secretary for Regional Security
Roberta Jacobson National Security Council “border czar”
Gary Gensler Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chairman*
Genine Macks Fidler  National Council on the Humanities
Shelley Greenspan White House liaison to the Jewish community
Thomas Nides U.S. Ambassador to Israel
Eric Garcetti U.S. Ambassador to India [to be confirmed]
Amy Gutmann U.S. Ambassador to Germany
David Cohen U.S. Ambassador to Canada
Mark Gitenstein U.S. Ambassador to the European Union
Deborah Lipstadt Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism
Jonathan Kaplan U.S. Ambassador to Singapore
Marc Stanley U.S. Ambassador to Argentina
Rahm Emanuel U.S. Ambassador to Japan
Sharon Kleinbaum Commissioner of the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom
Dan Shapiro Adviser on Iran
Alan Leventhal U.S. Ambassador to Denmark
Michael Adler U.S. Ambassador to Belgium
Michèle Taylor U.S. Representative to the United Nations Human Rights Council
Jonathan Kanter Assistant Attorney General in the United States Department of Justice Antitrust Division
Jed Kolko

Under Secretary of Commerce for Economic Affairs at the Department of Commerce

Aaron Keyak Deputy Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism
Stuart Eizenstat Special Adviser on Holocaust Issues
Steven Dettelbach Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives 
Amos Hochstein Bureau of Energy Resources Special Envoy
Eric Lander Science and Technology Adviser
Ned Price** State Department Spokesperson
Ellen Germain U.S. Special Envoy for Holocaust Issues

*Nominated by Biden but serves a five-year term and not technically a member of the administration.
**Price has a Jewish father and Christian mother and identifies as Jewish.



Link to comment
Share on other sites

who's behind the coup? Well Jeremy...how can i break this to you?

Clarkson Fights Back

If you haven’t signed the Free Speech Union’s petition urging the CEO of ITV not to fire Jeremy Clarkson, please do so now. Meanwhile, Clarkson has written a blistering attack on the woke takeover of Britain in today’s Sunday Times. Here’s how it begins:

My son came over for a father-and-son pre-football supper the other day, and as he fussed over the Aga, making a particularly fine stir fry, we laughed about what innocuous word had been banned that day and who’d been cancelled. And then, after a pause, he said with a solemn face, “You do know there’s a war going on, don’t you?”

He wasn’t talking about Ukraine. He was talking about a full-on left-wing campaign to unstitch and burn the fabric of Britain. And the genius is that no one really knows that what they’re doing is serious. We laugh as they change the name of the Sir Francis Drake Primary School to something less slavey. We think it’s all a big joke. But it isn’t.

Think about what typically happens in a military operation and then look what the woke left has done here. It’s seized control of our television and radio stations to such an extent that last week Sophie Raworth said, on the BBC News at Six, with a straight face, “And over now to our LGBT and diversity correspondent …”

And TV drama? Unaffected? Right, and when was the last time you saw a fictional police force hunting a gang of Muslim extremists? It’s always the far right. And it’s the same story in comedy. Say anything you like about Boris or Rishi and the laughter track is turned up to 11. Make a joke about she/him pronouns or Greta Thunberg and they’ll blow a piece of tumbleweed across the stage.

In sport we sometimes have three women doing the punditry at a men’s football match, and if anyone remarks on this on Twitter, they are immediately singled out for the india-rubber treatment. And who’s doing the erasing? Who’s making the rules? That’s just it. We don’t have a clue. What we do know is that, having taken control of the television stations, without a shot being fired, they turned their attention, like any conquering army, to the schools. Here they went fully Pol Pot, doing a comprehensive year-zero job on the curriculum so that kids would know their parents were all racists. Apart from those with “unconscious bias”. Who were racists as well.

You probably think, because you don’t know this war is going on, that when you drop little Johnny off at the school gates he’s going to learn the nine times table that day. No, he isn’t. He’s learning that he might actually be a girl, which is why there are probably tampon dispensers in the boys’ lavatories.

With all this in place, they set about the police, and here they’ve done a tremendous job. Because, so far as I can tell, almost all the officers in the Met — apart from the terrifying number of sexual perverts — are now more wide awake than a frightened fox.

When some young people with green hair glue themselves to the road, large numbers of officers are dispatched to stand around looking at them. And they are only ever removed from the tarmac if they promise to go immediately to the nearest art gallery and throw some soup at a painting.

Has Clarkson been red-pilled by his recent punishment beating at the hands of the progressive thought police?

Worth reading in full.

And don’t forget to sign the petition!

Stop Press: The petition now has 30,000 signatures.



  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you're taking flak you know you are over the target...


''whatever septic tank the followers of David Icke inhabited are now worming their way into the mainstream''

Conspiracy Britain: how the cranks crashed into the mainstream

From Andrew Bridgen bad-mouthing vaccines to Right Said Fred going to war against defibrillators, the country is developing a taste for the counter-narrative, writes Josh Glancy

Sunday January 22 2023, 12.01am, The Sunday Times

It began with a traffic filter. In November, the car-sceptic worthies of Oxfordshire county council decided to approve a £6.5 million scheme to reduce rush-hour traffic on Oxford’s busiest roads. The scheme, intended to curb pollution and even tackle climate change, will use cameras to catch and fine transgressors.

Obstructive? Definitely. Annoying? Probably. Part of a dastardly plot by the lizards of the World Economic Forum (WEF) to impose a permanent “climate lockdown” on the planet’s working classes? Probably not.

But that’s what the Oxford scheme soon morphed into — at least in the eyes of some furious locals, who allied with online cranks to propagate the WEF conspiracy theory. It quickly went global. Local councillors were targeted with death threats. Piers Corbyn got involved.

It sounds like a freak occurrence but this was just another weird week in Conspiracy Britain, a country rife with quackery and wingnuttery. Ideas that once belonged on the fringes of the internet and in whatever septic tank the followers of David Icke inhabited are now worming their way into the mainstream. We’re losing the plot.

Andrew Bridgen, once a functioning, if headbanging, Conservative MP, lost the Tory whip for calling Covid-19 vaccines the worst crime since the Holocaust. He has been retweeted by Aseem Malhotra, a cardiologist whose recent claim in a BBC interview that mRNA vaccines contributed to excess deaths from Covid went unchallenged. Right Said Fred, best known as purveyors of too-sexy mainstream pop music, are tweeting about how defibrillators are being sneaked into phone boxes to combat the surge in heart attacks as a result of the jab. Meanwhile, Russell Brand is busy broadcasting long rants on the role of the military-industrial complex in starting the war in Ukraine.


  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/11/2023 at 11:26 PM, Macnamara said:


The Luciferian Roots of the FBI - The Revealing with Shavon Ayala and Matt Ehret



After The Past Decade, Why Would Anybody Trust The FBI?

According to a poll from late 2022, 50% of Americans trust the FBI either “hardly ever” or “some of the time.”

According to a poll from late 2022, 50% of Americans trust the FBI either “hardly ever” or “some of the time.”

That raises the question, what’s with the other half of Americans who still give the G-Men the benefit of the doubt?

If events over the past 10 years haven’t been enough to convince those fellow countrymen that something is seriously amiss with the FBI, then perhaps the latest story will do the trick.

On Monday, Charles McGonigal, a former top FBI agent who was involved in the Trump-Russia probe, was arrested over the weekend for alleged activities with a Russian oligarch. Put another way, it seems that the guy who was investigating Trump for Russian collusion wound up colluding with Russia. The alleged crimes occurred in 2021 after McGonigal had resigned, but they could taint his previous work.

The news is only the most recent evidence that the FBI needs to be dismantled by Congress.

Consider that over the past decade, Americans have seen the FBI falsify information in order to spy on an American citizen working on a presidential campaign — Carter Page.

The government used bogus materials, chiefly the Steele Dossier, to launch the 2016 presidential election Russian interference investigation, which led to the Mueller probe, which hampered the majority of President Donald Trump’s presidency. Meanwhile, there was reason to believe that one of the key sources for the document, Igor Danchenko, was lying to the FBI. While acquitted, one has to wonder why the FBI trusted Danchenko at all. The Russian operative had been investigated in 2009 reportedly for trying to convince staffers at a progressive think tank to get jobs in the government where they had access to classified documents for a little “extra money.”

The FBI only dropped the case because they thought Danchenko had fled the country.

And that barely covers the surface of the Russia collusion hoax. There are plenty more suspicious circumstances involving sordid characters such as FBI agents Peter Stzrok and Lisa Page, who worked on the investigation known as Crossfire Hurricane despite having personal animosity toward Trump based on text messages.

Beyond that, we’ve also seen the FBI be effectively weaponized against parents who speak out at school board meetings under Biden. We’ve seen federal law enforcement use heavy-handed tactics against pro-lifers. The agency raided the home of a former president, yet seems to treat the current president with kid gloves over similar accusations.

Meanwhile, the guy in charge of the FBI, Christopher Wray, has dismissed the argument that Antifa and left-wing activists represent any sort of threat. In light of the Atlanta protests this past weekend, perhaps Wray is reconsidering his stance on that matter.

In addition to all the malign acts that the bureau has allegedly committed, they have also been AWOL on some pretty important cases. That creep and pervert from Michigan State University, Larry Nassar, was allowed to molest young women because the FBI botched its investigation.

Mass shooters always seem to be on the FBI’s “radar,” yet are never caught. Instead, they seem to be focused on Americans who question the COVID narrative.

Released Twitter emails show that the FBI works hand-in-hand with Big Tech — even pressuring social media platforms when necessary — in order to censor certain viewpoints.

Now for some on the Left and in legacy media, the latest story about McGonigal does cause suspicion.

Yet, due to their incapacity to see the world through anything but the lens of “Orange man bad,” the usual suspects think the arrest proves that the FBI covered up Trump’s connections to Russia.

“And just like that, the left is putting its favorite conspiracy theory back in play to explain FBI corruption,” WMAL’s Vince Coglianese tweeted, alongside screenshots showing inane ideas about what the alleged corruption implies:

That logic seems faulty, but perhaps it shows that even the Left isn’t so certain anymore that the FBI should be automatically supported by Americans. Granted, they can’t seem to view the world through anything other than “Orange man bad” — which explains their inane conclusions — but still, it’s a start.

To conclude, it’s almost dizzying trying to summarize the reasons why skepticism is needed, but for the love of Pete, why would anybody have blind faith in the FBI anymore?


Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/20/2022 at 11:52 AM, Macnamara said:

The British Constitution part 4


TREASON is the attempted destruction or conspiracy to destroy a nations sovereignty and its people


I think i took these notes off the British Constitution Group website:


key documents that make up the British Constitution include:

-Magna Carta 1215

-Declaration of Rights 1688

-Bill of Rights 1688 (is a parliamentary affirmation of the declaration of rights)


The consciousness of the people determines our collective moral boundaries and the COMMON LAW is meant to be the consolidation of the judgement of juries. So TRIAL BY JURY should shape the law.


Conscience is our inbuilt morality under universal natural law and should guide juries. Juries exercising their conscience should be able to over-rule legislation if they see no malicious intent on the part of the accused. This means that a jury judges on the guilt of the accused but also on the fairness of the legislation itself.


I have a side note which i think is from Mark Window's website which says that at its best the COMMON LAW should uphold NATURAL LAW.


Under COMMON LAW punishment is only ever received through a human, moral decision. If the jury decide against a statute then it is struck off under ANNULMENT BY JURY.


This power of the people over the law is the true meaning of DEMOCRACY not voting for political parties. The law does not belong to the state; it belongs to God the creator. The COMMON LAW recognises everyones inalienable rights and personal sovereignty.


It's basic principles are:

-to cause no intentional harm

-to take responsibility for our actions and inactions

-not to turn a blind eye to crimes of injustice


TREASON is the attempted destruction or conspiracy to destroy a nations sovereignty and its people


The British Constitution part 5: Magna Carta


Neil Oliver ‘…they are trying to alter the fabric of our reality’


  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mental Trench Warfare: the struggle over truth


The first world war changed how wars were fought. Both sides became entrenched and dug in to form lines of trenches and dug-outs with artillery behind them that lobbed shells and poisonous gas over their own lines onto the enemies positions. Now and then one side would try and force the other side back by launching an offensive that aimed to drive the enemy from their trench. Once driven from a trench the defeated side would simply settle back into one of the trenches behind their original position and the tug of war would continue with no side making any decisive victory.


This same dynamic is at work in the minds of the public. The cabal, working through their assets in the state launched a psychological offensive on the british public through project fear so that they could then launch a bioweapon attack in the form of the covid jabs. This jab-war had already been raging for over 100 years as some people questioned the validity of various vaccines.


This has been a personal issue for me for over a decade as I have struggled against the ignorance of others to try and keep my children safe. You can try and inform the people around you so that they can see what you can see and then stand with you to resist the external pressures but if they can't see it then they can oftentimes BECOME part of the external pressure. This then means that you become isolated and are left fighting a rear guard action against people and institutions that have the weight of the government behind them. As the people who control the government have an agenda to destroy the fabric of our society, including the health and fertility of its people you can always rely on state actors, at ALL levels to enforce things on you and your children that will ultimately cause harm. If you say what you really think eg 'I think the country is run by satanists and pedophiles who are waging war against the people of this land' then of course you will be branded as 'crazy' and state actors can then take action against you so you end up fighting with one hand tied behind your back. This then means that in order to neutralise the belligerant ignorance of those people at that level you need for the wider, bigger picture to change.


If for example wider society comes to the same conclusions as you then suddenly you cannot be isolated and also you can't be brushed off as 'crazy' or 'delusional'. That is what we ultimately need in order to be able to protect our children. Of course ignorant or malevolent state actors can still call you those things if the official line hasn't changed, even if the court of public opinion has switched to your side. This is kind of the position we are now moving towards with the whole covid psuedo-pandemic. The official line is still: 'the covid vaccines are safe and effective' and that they have 'saved millions of lives' so various state actors working through the myriad arms of the state will then cling to that narrative and will remain hostile towards anyone who disagrees with that position even if the public themselves have come to suspect the jabs and the government and corporate media's motives.


So what we have going on here is psychological trench warfare with the state launching lies and psyops on the public alongside actual bioweapons whilst members of the public such as myself push back with facts and evidence to expose their lies. They have scored some devastating blows both physically and mentally on the population and we are now seeing MP's calling for an investigation into the 3000 a week excess deaths:

Massive spike in excess deaths sparks calls for an 'urgent investigation': NHS crisis is blamed for nearly 3,000 more Brits than usual dying each week



However as you can see in the headline above these deaths are being framed as being caused by problems with the NHS; Neil Oliver has torpedoed this argument by pointing out that other countries who don't have the NHS are also experiencing high excess deaths so clearly ambulance waiting times does not satisfactorily answer the question of the high excess deaths although of course disruptions WILL be responsible for SOME deaths.


To hide the harms caused by the jabs we are seeing the captured, corporate media blaming all the sudden deaths, of people of all ages, on everything from gardening to shovelling snow! This story below claims that a girl has died of cardiac arrest from inhaling deodorant:

'We don't want our daughter's death to be in vain': Parents of schoolgirl, 14, who died after accidentally inhaling deodorant fumes call for clearer labelling on aerosol cans

...she after died from a cardiac arrest after in haling areosol deodorant



If we float up above the battleground, in an observation balloon, and survey the scene before us, we can see that after their early, devastating advances the enemy is now in retreat, at least on the covid front (they are advancing aggressively on other fronts such as digital currencies, digital identities and 'green' agenda etc). The enemy is not however being routed but is rather undertaking a controlled and staggered retreat towards a new entrenched position. Lets examine some of the psychological skirmishes they are launching as they fall back:

CDC and FDA say they're investigating possible link between Pfizer's bivalent Covid booster and strokes in seniors over age of 65 — but officials have 'no concerns at this time'



So do you see what they are doing there? They are admitting that the jabs cause strokes but they are telling all of the jabbed people that it is only those people over 65 who are affected! Apparently by some sort of undisclosed wizardry the jabs know a persons age and only give you strokes if you are over 65! This is however giving some ground as it undermines their: the jabs are 'safe and effective' position. Now they fall back to:

Getting Pfizer's Covid booster and flu vaccine on the same day may raise the risk of a STROKE, FDA says



This means that even people UNDER 65 can get strokes from the jabs but ONLY if they also have the flu jab on the same day! So all of those jabbed people, under 65 who have not had the flu jab, on the same day breath a sigh of relief and say to themselves 'well i'm off the hook then!' However this new position is an undermining of the previous position that only jabbed people over 65's are at risk from strokes and a further departure from the original position of 'the vaccines are safe and effective'.


I suggest that the fall back position that they are preparing to make their stand at is that they will eventually admit that 'yes the jabs are not 100% safe and that yes there have been some adverse reactions but that this has all happened by mistake and that they did the best they could with the information they had and that ultimately the jabs will have saved more lives then they have taken and therefore on balance they were still worth it'. This argument essentially claims negligence rather than conscious conspiracy.


This is actually a very strong defencive position for them to hide behind because of the phenomena of human psychology i mentioned in a previous post, which is to say that most people believe what they WANT to believe. Telling the jabbed that they carry some risk but have ultimately done the 'right thing' allows their ego off the hook as it gives them a new, palatable perception of reality to cling to. Those people will then not want to budge from that perception of reality because they do not want to embrace the horrific reality that their government is waging war against them.


However as i explained above this does not make any of us safe as the state and its various levels of minions from police to doctors, from social workers to military can all continue to follow 'protocols' given to them FROM ABOVE whilst rationalising to themselves that they are doing 'the right thing' for the 'greater good' even as they destroy peoples lives, liberty, health and fertility.


We need a decisive victory where not only the court of public opinion can see the truth of the scale of this deception and the malevolence behind it but also all the uniformed minions of the system can no longer deny it and therefore cease to be a threat to our liberty and health. Imagine a world without that stress where we, the people (uniformed or not), truely ARE 'all in it together' and then work towards it.

Edited by Macnamara
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's interesting comparing  the 1976

first swine flu vaccine program was stopped after

12  elderly people died of heart failure (25 or so deaths)

 Compared With now when it's difficult to keep up with the injuries and deaths very often in younger people and still it's not pulled.

Keeping emergency status ongoing and not backing down and admitting truth .



"Why are they hiding the data?

All we need from any state in the US, or any country anywhere in the world is a spreadsheet of everyone who died after 2021 with:

Age at time of death

Date of death

Date of last COVID vaccination

That’s it."

How do I know this

I’ve collected over 1,500 death reports that have the three pieces of data and the signal is extremely strong. It’s as clear as night and day. "


They are less worried about being seen as democratic with increased surveillance and

distracted or dumbed down population (or they plan it that way)

So as Russell and Brzinski etc said people wont be able to think for themselves but only trust experts

eg  telyscreen  etc that's the boundary to cross it seems especially as all psychology behavioural sciences are employed.

but perhaps they underestimate the Hobbits !





Edited by Talorgan
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Talorgan said:

It's interesting comparing  the 1976

first swine flu vaccine program was stopped after

12  elderly people died of heart failure (25 or so deaths)

 Compared With now when it's difficult to keep up with the injuries and deaths very often in younger people and still it's not pulled.


they were probing our defences


10 minutes ago, Talorgan said:

Keeping emergency status ongoing and not backing down and admitting truth .

They are less worried about being seen as democratic with increased surveillance and

distracted or dumbed down population (or they plan it that way)

So as Russell and Brzinski etc said people wont be able to think for themselves but only trust experts

eg  telyscreen  etc that's the boundary to cross it seems especially as all psychology behavioural sciences are employed.

but perhaps they underestimate the Hobbits !


this time its their BIG PUSH. They are going for TOTAL VICTORY aka the GREAT RESET

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Macnamara said:

So what we have going on here is psychological trench warfare with the state launching lies and psyops on the public alongside actual bioweapons whilst members of the public such as myself push back with facts and evidence to expose their lies. They have scored some devastating blows both physically and mentally on the population and we are now seeing MP's calling for an investigation into the 3000 a week excess deaths


Trench warfare is an analogy I'd not thought of before but it's a good one, even though most of the public don't know we're in a trench. It's a war of knowledge and belief systems, and just any compulsive liar the cabal needs to keep up the false beliefs in us, while holding onto the truth in themselves.


So it's an unstable situation over the long-term, which could collapse at any time, which perhaps explains why their efforts are speeding up.  Also they need a supply of trustworthy new recruits who won't grow a conscience and betray them, hence the cultish nature of the cabal. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Campion said:

Trench warfare is an analogy I'd not thought of before but it's a good one, even though most of the public don't know we're in a trench. It's a war of knowledge and belief systems


i think that by incrementally changing the narrative they manage to maintain control of the PERCEPTION of the public. If they instead made a massive admission such as: 'the vaccines are harmful' then that would be a major perception shift for the public which is what creates an 'awakening' where they lose control of that person's mind. So by changing the persons perceptions slowly the person continues to go along with them on the journey even though each shift is an admission that the previous position was false. It's like letting a balloon down gently by releasing the air in small bursts: they are deflating the BIG LIE.


They can't admit criminal INTENT though as that is a requirement for conviction under criminal law so they will try and paint the whole thing as a well meaning mistake to lead to a lesser charge of negligence. If they can convince the public that there was no malice in the act then they can seek to stave off the outrage. But yeah its a war over the hearts and minds of the public and i just wish the public would stop listening to evil psychopaths

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Strange Military Deaths pt 24

Female army officer cadet, 21, who was found hanged at Sandhurst had fallen victim to 'gross sexual misconduct' at the hands of officers, inquest hears

By Katherine Lawton

Published: 17:56 GMT, 27 January 2023 | Updated: 20:08 GMT, 27 January 2023


Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think most of us like to think that the military is there to protect us and protect our country but that is not reality. Reality is that if you question the official line of the state they will set the military on you; is this what our grandparents fought in the war for? So that we could be herded and injected like cattle and then bullied by the apparatus of the state when we questioned it?

Army spied on lockdown critics: Sceptics, including our own Peter Hitchens, long suspected they were under surveillance. Now we've obtained official records that prove they were right all along

By Glen Owen Political Editor

Published: 22:05 GMT, 28 January 2023 | Updated: 22:06 GMT, 28 January 2023

A shadowy Army unit secretly spied on British citizens who criticised the Government’s Covid lockdown policies, The Mail on Sunday can reveal.

Military operatives in the UK’s ‘information warfare’ brigade were part of a sinister operation that targeted politicians and high-profile journalists who raised doubts about the official pandemic response.

They compiled dossiers on public figures such as ex-Minister David Davis, who questioned the modelling behind alarming death toll predictions, as well as journalists such as Peter Hitchens and Toby Young. Their dissenting views were then reported back to No 10.

Documents obtained by the civil liberties group Big Brother Watch, and shared exclusively with this newspaper, exposed the work of Government cells such as the Counter Disinformation Unit, based in the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, and the Rapid Response Unit in the Cabinet Office.

But the most secretive is the MoD’s 77th Brigade, which deploys ‘non-lethal engagement and legitimate non-military levers as a means to adapt behaviours of adversaries’.

According to a whistleblower who worked for the brigade during the lockdowns, the unit strayed far beyond its remit of targeting foreign powers. They said that British citizens’ social media accounts were scrutinised – a sinister activity that the Ministry of Defence, in public, repeatedly denied doing.

Papers show the outfits were tasked with countering ‘disinformation’ and ‘harmful narratives... from purported experts’, with civil servants and artificial intelligence deployed to ‘scrape’ social media for keywords such as ‘ventilators’ that would have been of interest.

Not misinformation, but ordinary, afraid people 

The information was then used to orchestrate Government responses to criticisms of policies such as the stay-at-home order, when police were given power to issue fines and break up gatherings. It also allowed Ministers to push social media platforms to remove posts and promote Government-approved lines.

The Army whistleblower said: ‘It is quite obvious that our activities resulted in the monitoring of the UK population... monitoring the social media posts of ordinary, scared people. These posts did not contain information that was untrue or co-ordinated – it was simply fear.’

Last night, former Cabinet Minister Mr Davis, a member of the Privy Council, said: ‘It’s outrageous that people questioning the Government’s policies were subject to covert surveillance’ – and questioned the waste of public money.

Mail on Sunday journalist Mr Hitchens was monitored after sharing an article, based on leaked NHS papers, which claimed data used to publicly justify lockdown was incomplete. An internal Rapid Response Unit email said Mr Hitchens wanted to ‘further [an] anti-lockdown agenda and influence the Commons vote’. Writing today, Mr Hitchens questions if he was ‘shadow-banned’ over his criticisms, with his views effectively censored by being downgraded in search results. He says: ‘The most astonishing thing about the great Covid panic was how many attacks the state managed to make on basic freedoms without anyone much even caring, let alone protesting. Now is the time to demand a full and powerful investigation into the dark material Big Brother Watch has bravely uncovered.’

The whistleblower from 77 Brigade, which uses both regular and reserve troops, said: ‘I developed the impression the Government were more interested in protecting the success of their policies than uncovering any potential foreign interference, and I regret that I was a part of it. Frankly, the work I was doing should never have happened.’

The source also suggested that the Government was so focused on monitoring critics it may have missed genuine Chinese-led prolockdown campaigns.

Silkie Carlo, of Big Brother Watch, said: ‘This is an alarming case of mission creep, where public money and military power have been misused to monitor academics, journalists, campaigners and MPs who criticised the Government, particularly during the pandemic.

‘The fact that this political monitoring happened under the guise of “countering misinformation” highlights how, without serious safeguards, the concept of “wrong information” is open to abuse and has become a blank cheque the Government uses in an attempt to control narratives online.

‘Contrary to their stated aims, these Government truth units are secretive and harmful to our democracy. The Counter Disinformation Unit should be suspended immediately and subject to a full investigation.’

A Downing Street source last night said the units had scaled back their work significantly since the end of the lockdowns.

This snooping was wrong, it hangs over my proud Army career like a black cloud

By Anonymous (Ex-77th brigade officer)


I was serving in the British Army in March 2020 when I was seconded to 77th Brigade, on the basis I would be helping root out foreign state misinformation on social media.

We were told what was legally allowed – such as ‘scraping’ online platforms for keywords – and what was illegal. This included repeatedly looking at a named UK individual’s account without authorisation, although some people would do that from their own accounts after their shift.

We would take screenshots of tweets from people expressing dissatisfaction with the UK Government’s action against Covid. The project leader would then gather these screenshots and send them to the Cabinet Office. Feedback from the Cabinet Office would direct us over what to look for the next day.

To skirt the legal difficulties of a military unit monitoring domestic dissent, the view was that unless a profile explicitly stated their real name and nationality they could be a foreign agent and were fair game. But it is quite obvious that our activities resulted in the monitoring of the UK population… the social media posts of ordinary, scared people. These posts did not contain information that was untrue or co-ordinated – it was simply fear.

We learned from the feedback that the Government were very keen on hearing what the public thought of their Covid response.

I entered this role believing I would be uncovering foreign information warfare. Instead, I found the banner of disinformation was a guise under which the British military was being deployed to monitor and flag our own concerned citizens. There may have actually been social media campaigns from China to promote lockdown policies but because we were directed to monitor sentiment towards the success of lockdown, we would have completely missed them. I had the impression the Government were more interested in protecting the success of their policies than uncovering foreign interference, and I regret that I was a part of it.

Recently, I looked over my medals and thought of all I have done in my career – things I am proud of, in the defence of the people of this country – except my work on ‘disinformation’ in 77, which hangs over my career like a black cloud.

It was about domestic perception, not national security. Frankly, the work I was doing should never have happened. This domestic monitoring of citizens seemed not to be driven by a desire to address the public’s concerns, but to identify levers for compliance with controversial Government policies.

I do not doubt that the activities I participated in were conceived for good reasons, but they were undemocratic, wrong, and should not be allowed to happen again.


  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Beyond the media veil


In a recent clip Neil Oliver spoke about how he felt like he was living in two worlds at once: in one world people could see all of this skullduggery going on and in the other they could not and he had to live in both those worlds simultaneously. I have been living in both those worlds now for way over a decade so I know exactly what he means.


I come onto this website and will watch a clip below of Bill Gates admitting that the covid jabs don't work and i'll lament to my missus how that isn't front page news on all the newspapers. Every single person in Britain should see that and yet they won't. We had that pfizer person interviewed by the EU parliament admitting that the jabs don't prevent transmission but how many people in the british public saw that? It certainly won't have been on the BBC news.


So what we have is a situation that's kinda like harry potter! There is the wizarding world of people with a broader awareness of reality, whose minds are exploring possibilities and who are listening to all kinds of whistleblowers from spies to business chiefs, from doctors to military who are giving the inside scoop on what's really going on in the world but none of it breaks through the veil to the mainstream, corporate media and then there is the muggle world of people who never look beyond the mainstream corporate media, who are completely clueless yet convinced they know everything.


If you never look beyond the mainstream, corporate media you will NEVER know the truth about things because the truth is never reported there. This clip was on the children's health defence website but why isn't it on the television?

Bill Gates MRNA Grift EXPOSED? Billionaire TRASHES Jab Despite Reaping MASSIVE Profits: Brie & Robby


Edited by Macnamara
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Englandspiel pt10 & Strange Military Deaths part 25: Operation Rimau and the Timor Conspiracy Part 1


This is a bit of a combo of themes as it has a bit of everything! I saw a clip of Max Igan not too long ago talking about the recent shooting of the rookie cops in new south wales and he believed that the rookies were set up as cannon fodder in order to create a violent situation that could then be used to demonise 'conspiracy theorists' who had been lockdown / mRNA jab skeptics.


It sounds like the people accused of the shooting had been leant on by the state who were threatening to seize their home through compulsory purchase ('eminant domain' in the US) because they wanted the land for something.....mining or something like that....i can't remember the specifics. They had basically whipped these people up into such a frightened and paranoid state that they were preparing to defend themselves. But there was more to it i believe. There was also a side story about how one of them had worked in the school system and had learned about high placed pedophiles but once again i'm hazy on the details. But the point was that Max believed that these people were being disposed of and set up by the state and that in order to do that the police higher ups sent these greenhorn cops just out of cop school to be the bait and needless to say they got shot up by people who thought they were coming to kill them. In that clip max then had a bit of a dig at the new south wales police saying they were corrupt and brutal so this story i'm going to talk about kinda ties into that. What a web they have spun!


Operation Rimau is not really known about by many people in Britain despite it being an incredible story about the exploits of wartime commandos who were taking the war to the Japanese after they had swept down the Malay peninsular and took singapore. One of my ancestors was captured in Singapore and spent time in the notorious changi prison but captured commandos got an even rougher ride and were sent to the hellish Outram Road jail to be tortured and invariably executed usually by beheading. The story is better known about in Australia from where the operation was launched and the junk , 'the krait', which was used in the previous 'Jaywick' raid is now a visitor attraction in sydney harbour. I have a vague recollection of watching a TV adaptation of the story as a lad but all I can remember about it was that Jason Donovan played the sailor nicknamed 'happy'!


One British officer who had escaped capture was Ivan Lyon of the Gordon Highlanders regiment. Lyon was a real adventurer whose talent for sailing got him a task of scoping out the malay peninsular to assess its vulnerability to Japanese attack. All warnings sent from the lower ranks about the weakness of the british defences at that time were ignored by London. In the end the Japanese just raced down the peninsular on bicycles, taking many by surprise at their speed of advance. No doubt those warning top brass were simply dismissed as the 'conspiracy whackjobs' of their day....


SOE once again tie into all the cloak and dagger shenanigans and its worth repeating, if i've mentioned it in previous 'Englandspiel' segments that a fire destroyed all the SOE records after the war thereby making the task of picking apart the failures of englandspiel far harder. One SOE agent by the name of Major Chapman was tasked with picking up the rimau men at the end of their mission, in a submarine. He had arranged with them to meet them at a rendez-vouz point on the island of merepas but instead of hanging around the submarine left to go hunting enemy shipping. IMO Major chapman should have done whatever was required to ensure that the submarine commander stuck around for the agreed amount of time even if it required the gravest of threats. After a journalist challenged him about this 20 years later Chapman was found dead in his car with an old second world war cyanide capsule which was standard issue for SOE field operatives.


Major Lyon on the krait, with a mad glint in his eye:





  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Operation Rimau and the Timor Conspiracy Pt2


The story of what befell the Rimau men would have been lost had it not been for the research of an Australian Commando called Major Tom Hall who was,during his service, one day tasked with taking a journalist out on the sea in the old canvas style canoes of the second world war. The journalist informed him that during world war 2 some men had travelled a vast distance, through occupied territory in that kind of canoe. Hall believed it couldn't possible so he set out to investigate the claims of the journalist for himself and so began his journey to uncover the fates of the rimau men and to ensure their story was told.


Hall's research was used by Lynette Ramsey Silver to write an account of the raid 'The Heroes of Rimau'. At the end of that book is a chapter titled 'the Timor Conspiracy' which details another Englandspiel-style scandal that occurred in that theatre of the war.


After the japanese invaded Dutch-Timor in 1942 Australian and portuguese operatives were sent into the jungle to gather intelligence and to sabotage the japanese. Some were captured and interrogated after a softening up period of beatings, sleep deprivation, paralysingly tight bonds, salted food and water to create extreme dehydration along with being thrown in a fly and mosquito infested cell under the verandah of the kempei's building (the secret police). The tight bonds caused sores and their feet rotted in their boots. Eventually they agreed to send wireless messages back to the allies. The young australian operative Ellwood had not been given an 'authenticator word' nor had he been provided a cover story and the Japanese had obtained ciphers and relevant documents from elsewhere.


He tried dropping hints in his messages by claiming they were in areas unrealistically far from their previous positions and in areas known to be occupied by the enemy, giving drop zones in the sea and refusing extraction despite it being a firm arrangement prior to his deployment. The SRD intelligence service in australia did not pick up on any of the hints and broke security protocol by giving the names of other operatives in the area. They told Ellwood that another group of agents would be sent out so Ellwood sought to warn the group as they approached; he punched his guard and ran but was chased down and beaten senseless, starved in the sun for two days and dragged back to Dili behind a horse. The second team were ambushed on arrival by the waiting japanese and captured. More ineptitudes followed and by the end of the war 31 agents had been killed and many more timorese tortured and/or killed for assisting SRD men.


After the war a trial was set up to try the japanese officers involved in the various war crimes but General Blamey passed a directive that no member of 2 Special Unit was to be used as a witness in the trial. The trial was then rushed, 5 key pieces of evidence were dismissed by the president of the court, Lieutenant-colonel brownand huge amounts of documentation were disallowed creating a sham trial. The japanese officers were handed incredibly lenient sentences leading to public outrage in australia whilst the press remained quiet on the issue. This swept all the strange goings on under the carpet and kept the heads of higher ups off the chopping block. The scandal even involved a direct cross-over with the englandspiel scandal in which 64 agents had been captured in holland because the scapegoat of englandspiel was SOE man, major seymour bingham who was then banished to australia where he then got embroiled in the timor conspiracy scandal.


General Blamey had already been involved in two scandals prior to his military career whilst in the Victorian police including one where his CIB superintendant had been shot. Any scandal involving Blamey would have threatened to bring to light the existence of a secret army, with tens of thousands of members, known as 'the association' that had been formed after the war which was prepared to carry out a coup against the australian government if the labour party had won the 1949 election as it intended to nationalise the banks.


Former Prime Minister Robert Gordon Menzies had been Victorias Attorney General during Blamey's reign as chief of police and in 1950 he made Blamey into a field marshall (the highest military rank). We know about 'operation gladio' secret armies in europe and how they have fed into the ukrainian conflict and you have to wonder if these groups were ever really disbanded?

Edited by Macnamara
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Pentagon, Big Pharma, and Globalist War

January 27, 2023

By Richard Hugus

Covid began as, and still is, a worldwide operation. While biological warfare agents may have been created for nefarious purposes in a secret lab, these agents would probably have minimal effect on the world population. The real attack was relentless propaganda about a pandemic and coercing “everyone on the planet” (as Bill Gates put it) into taking an injection of the actual biowarfare agent — the C-19 “vaccine.” That injection has now killed and injured millions of people in many different countries. The coverup for this is ongoing, despite the appalling evidence of harm and sudden death.

There is nothing new under the sun, but it’s always a surprise to hear the details of how governments have once again betrayed the people they claim to serve.  ‘Betrayed’ is putting it mildly. In the past month, we’ve seen government criminality on three fronts:

1) The covid narrative on social media being micromanaged by FBI agents and White House staff who directly violated the 1st Amendment by telling Facebook and Twitter who and what to censor on their platforms.

2) Government spokespeople making statements that anyone who disagrees with the official medical fascist narrative is spreading disinformation and is a threat to society.

3) A trail of contracts between federal bureaucracies proving the covid operation was run not by the supposed health authorities — CDC, FDA, etc. — but by the war authority, the US Department of Defense.


We already know mainstream media is the propaganda arm of the state. And we know that propagandists don’t allow alternative views. So let’s concentrate on item 3 — the DoD contracts.

You have to hand it to bureaucracies — they follow the rules. It turns out they keep records and make proper legal contracts even when engaged in mass murder. According to documents obtained through FOIA by Sasha Latypova and  Katherine Watt, the US government saw Covid-19 as terrorism, to which the appropriate response was counterterrorism. In other words, C-19 was not a health emergency but a national security emergency, one so sensitive that the public couldn’t even be informed about it. The contracts describe the development of pharmaceutical products which would act as “countermeasures” — namely, mRNA “vaccines” never before used on a mass scale. Beginning in 2020 under Operation Warp Speed, the federal government used an Emergency Use Authorization and other legal measures to go around normal procedures for testing and approval of new medical products, controlling the quality of these medical products, and coercing the public into taking them. Product safety was not a priority. All this was done without American citizens ever being told they were supposedly being attacked by a “foreign threat.” It is now almost three years since the covid operation started, and the documents uncovered by Latypova and Watt are the first news most of us have ever heard about a foreign threat.

This means that the US government treated Covid as an act of war. What are the implications of this?

First, who was attacking us? Was it Russia? Not likely, as Russia was involved in the same program ― declaring a pandemic and treating it with their own “countermeasure” — Sputnik. Was it China? Not likely, as China declared a pandemic and also massively locked down. China then rolled out its “countermeasure” — Sinovac. It is also widely reported that China worked cooperatively with the US on gain of function research. According to Latypova, a large Chinese company called Fosun Pharmaceuticals had cooperative agreements with Pfizer, BioNtech, and the Israeli government to develop an mRNA product to be used as the countermeasure. Most governments around the world followed the covid script, declaring a pandemic on cue and using purposely generated fear to push medical products from Pfizer/BioNtech, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson, and Astra Zeneca. Finally, the foreign threat is not identified in any of the documents. They have been heavily redacted.

Since it appears the war on corona in the US was in the hands of the national security establishment, we were apparently wasting our time blaming the clown directors of the NIAID, CDC, and FDA for incompetence, malfeasance, and fraud. They were just running cover for the DoD as it mobilized to defend us from an outbreak of biological warfare so dastardly that American citizens of the US couldn’t even be informed. In this scenario, Fauci, Collins, and Walensky agreed to look like they were in charge, take flak, and deceive us,  for our own good — a kind of patriotic duty. And, as career bureaucrats, they knew they were covered legally because, afterall, our country was under attack — we were at war. This might explain their galling arrogance.

The 2020 war on viruses has a lot in common with the 2001 war on terror. One was enabled by a factitious pandemic, the other was enabled by a factitious terror attack. In both cases, the designated enemy was not a nation or group but a concept,  invisible, uncapturable, and ever-changing — the perfect enemy if you want an unlimited budget and a pretext for attacks on civil liberties and wars there would otherwise be no justification for. Wars are more often than not started in this way. The US Department of Defense knows quite well how to start a war and they aren’t shy about casualties either. To be sure, big pharma and the health establishment both have experience with “interventions” which cause injury and death, but pharma’s model is more nuanced. Pharma promotes products that create chronic illness, which in turn increases product sales, so killing people is bad for business. Not so for DoD.

Covid began as, and still is, a worldwide operation. While biological warfare agents may have been created for nefarious purposes in a secret lab, these agents would probably have minimal effect on the world population. The real attack was relentless propaganda about a pandemic and coercing “everyone on the planet” (as Bill Gates put it) into taking an injection of the actual biowarfare agent — the C-19 “vaccine.” That injection has now killed and injured millions of people in many different countries. The coverup for this is ongoing, despite the appalling evidence of harm and sudden death.

This is surely the most insane war the Pentagon has ever conducted, but it is of a kind with other wars. How many died in the Philippines, in the World Wars, in Korea, in Vietnam, in Central America, in Iraq, in Palestine, in Somalia, in Sudan, in Libya, in Yemen. in Syria? How many are now dying in Ukraine in a proxy war with Russia which US neocons — the same who created and led the war on terror — did everything in their power to provoke?

The question now is, do the people who seem to be running everything have any qualms about destroying the United States as well? Do they have allegiance to any particular nation, or are they a power above nations?  This question is hard to avoid with all the bragging by globalists at Davos and their plans for our world. Reducing the world population is a stated goal for many of them. Is it too much to imagine the US Department of Defense would be the most likely tool to use for that project? Is it too much to imagine that the people telling the DoD what to do may see no further use for the United States? Is it too much to imagine that the same people who were willing to wipe out so many innocent people everywhere else in the world would eventually turn their sights on Americans? The US has not had preferential treatment – it has seen vaccine injury and death at a higher rate than most other countries. That does not seem to be a problem for whoever is running the show.

We are left to conclude from the documents published by Latypova and Watt that the “vaccine countermeasure” which was developed under the DoD was itself the attack. The unnamed “foreign threat” was a just a projection of those who invented the entire operation. Whoever the perpetrators are, their enemy is not any one country, but humanity itself. Infants, pregnant women, the elderly, black, white, rich, poor, children, athletes, pilots, celebrities, high school students, husbands, wives, moms, dads, African, Asian, American — the jab targets everyone. Whether this war is for economic gain, for empire, or even the lofty goals claimed by globalists, nihilism and hatred of life pervades it all. This path only leads to darkness. It is our obligation to take the opposite path.


  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The British Constitution Part 6: The Power rests with the people



Website: https://www.commonlawconstitution.org/

Memes: https://www.commonlawconstitution.org...

This is BIG!


'We cannot be told what to do by Government' Neil Oliver on the state of Britain's democracy


Edited by Macnamara
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ministry of Defence spent £230MILLION on accommodation and travel - including five-star hotels for top brass - while soldiers and their families endure appalling conditions in military homes

  • Taxpayer funded officers and officials staying in luxury hotels in exotic locations
  • Meanwhile hundreds of military families suffered without heating or hot water

By Natasha Livingstone

Published: 00:53 GMT, 5 February 2023 | Updated: 01:12 GMT, 5 February 2023

The Ministry of Defence spent £230 million on accommodation and travel over the past three years as top brass enjoyed five-star hotels, documents reveal.

Meanwhile, soldiers and their families endure appalling conditions in military homes.

The taxpayer-funded outlay includes hundreds of senior officers and officials staying in luxury hotels in exotic locations, documents obtained in a Freedom of Information (FoI) request reveal.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are COVID-19 ‘Vaccines’ a Military Biodefense Response Gone Terribly Wrong?

February 1, 2023 By LFC NEWS

Were the COVID-19 vaccines part of dual-use “Biodefence Security Covered Countermeasures,” and were they developed by the US Department of Defense prior the ‘global pandemic’?

Freddie Ponton
21st Century Wire

In analyzing the timeline of the COVID-19 pandemic response and the subsequent vaccine roll-out, the structure they have put in place is nothing short of amazing. Governments have erected an incredible shield – protected behind a legal framework which they have carefully crafted over the years, creating revolving doors and loopholes for themselves to side-step all public health regulatory measures by declaring a “Public Health Emergency” and the subsequent Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) it triggers. In hindsight, we now know that COVID-19 wasn’t a public health emergency, so why did governments go through so much trouble to protect themselves from liability, and gamble with the health and well-being of entire populations? This has never happened before in human history. Is their more to this than meet the eyes?

COVID-19 Response and Its Security Covered Countermeasures

As a result of few confirmed cases of 2019 ‘novel’ coronavirus (2019-nCoV), on 31 January, 2020, Alex M. Azar II, Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS), pursuant to the authority vested in him under section 319 of the Public Health Service Act, determined that a public health emergency existed and had existed since 27 January, 2020 in the United States of America.

Many of us have vivid memories regarding Trump’s announcement and the subsequent launch of his ‘Operation Warp Speed’ vaccine task force in response to the coronavirus outbreak.

Coronavirus outbreak: Trump announces launch of ‘Operation Warp Speed’ vaccine task force:

As of 30 January, 2021, five of the six Operation Warp Speed (OWS) vaccine candidates had entered Phase 3 clinical trials, two of which were Moderna’s and Pfizer/BioNTech’s vaccines. We were led to believe that they had received an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). For vaccines that received the EUA, additional data on vaccine effectiveness were generated from further follow-up of participants in clinical trials already underway before the EUA was issued.

The questions we will be addressing in this article are essential and crucial to understand the FDA’s role during the COVID-19 pandemic response, and to establish if indeed the FDA was legally in charge of the regulatory processes including the assessment of the clinical data from the vaccine manufacturers.

Was FDA mandate adapted to ensure a strict independent review of the clinical data in the context of an Emergency Use Authorization, and was current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) respected? Both questions need to be answered, as they touch upon vital measures and protocols which are expected to be in place to ensure the safety and efficacy of a new vaccine to be deployed within the American population.

FDA – The Regulatory Smoke Screen

Firstly, it’s important to identify who were the key players behind the COVID-19 pandemic response.

“Operation Warp Speed” was operating largely independently of the existing White House coronavirus task force, which we now know at some stage shifted its focus toward vaccine development.

According to the White House statement, Colonel Deborah Birx was detailed to the office of the Vice President and reported directly to Mike Pence. She was fully supported by the National Security Council (NSC) and joined the task force led by Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Alex Azar.

Here is a list of some of the key operatives of the Operation Warp Speed.

We could spend hours exposing the conflicts of interest many of these operatives have with Big Pharma, but for now let’s focus on Colonel Deborah Birx, President Donald Trump’s COVID-19 coordinator, and provide you with some interesting comments made by Dr Stephen M. Hahn, MD, Commissioner of U.S. Food and Drug Administration during an interview with the Reagan-Udall Foundation, and the American Medical Association (AMA) President Susan R. Bailey, MD where he outlined some aspects of the FDA’s response during the pandemic.

Everything about Colonel Deborah Birx (source)

Birx began her career with the Department of Defense, serving at Walter Reed Army Medical Center and rising to the rank of colonel while serving as the director of the U.S. Military’s HIV Research Program.

She was a strategic OWS asset, acting as what we could call “The Bridge” between the NSC statutory members, the HSS and the US DoD. Her mandate was perhaps one the of the most strategic within the federal government and by taking the time to review her career, we can better understand why she was picked by the DoD and the NSC to be the lead interface with the HHS and its various partner agencies.

Birx served as director of the Centers for Disease Control’s (CDC) Division of Global HIV/AIDS from 2005 to 2014 and brought a wealth of experience in infectious disease, immunologic, vaccine research and inter-agency coordinating capacity to address the challenges faced by both Operation Warp Speed and the National Security Council who were not shy to characterize the FDA as a ‘scientific advisory body’ rather than a regulator.

Birx became an ambassador for Global Health Diplomacy in April 2014, where she was the US government’s leader for combating AIDS globally, and she was expected to bring that expertise to the coronavirus response in 2020.

Power in the Pandemic

A “working organization chart” obtained by the journal Science, shows Col. Deborah Birx’s central roles in the federal COVID-19 response. She coordinated the White House Coronavirus Task Force (WHCTF) and co-chairs two of its three divisions: the Unified Coordination Group, which manages the response from the HHS and DoD, and Operation Warp Speed, whose task was to develop vaccines in cooperation with several agencies. The Physician Advisory Group had only an advisory role.

I guess this establishes the fact that FDA Commissioner Dr. Stephan Hahn was only an advisor and had no real executive power nor authorities to regulate the development and manufacturing of the various pharmaceutical products being promoted to supposedly “fight COVID”, the main ones being vaccines, or to be more accurate “medical countermeasures”.

Listed individuals co-chair the groups. (This chart was issued on 31 July 2020) source

In 2020, there was no shortage of controversies for new FDA Commissioner Dr Stephen M Hahn said the Wall Street Journal. Dr Hahn had no previous Government experience, but was somehow parachuted in around December 2019, at the helm of the FDA, where one year later he would determine that Pfizer-BioNTech’s COVID-19 mRNA ‘vaccine’ had somehow met the statutory criteria for issuance of an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) on December 11, 2020. His decision will later reveal itself as a game changer for our safety – as Hahn completely surrendered the FDA regulatory power to the US Department of Defense (DoD), and to some extent to the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA). This was the essence of Operation Warp Speed: to bypass all the normal regulator safety rules and procedures by moving the entire effort under the aegeus of the Pentagon.

The Reagan-Udall Foundation, the American Medical Association (AMA) President Susan R. Bailey, MD and Dr. Stephen Hahn outlined the FDA’s response during the pandemic, challenges presented and information on the latest developments. (Source)

Video Player


These facts are illustrated even further in this FDA document taken from a meeting presentation by the Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response (ASPR) and their vaccines and related biological products advisory committee, October 22, 2020.

This constitutes another proof that indeed the US Department of Defense was in charge of the vaccine research & development as well as the manufacturing and logistical efforts to deploy these medical countermeasures in the US and beyond.

BARDA/ASPR/HHS COVID-19 Vaccine Development Portfolio (FDA Source):


As you can see clinical trials and their design falls under the responsibility of the US DoD, and same goes for manufacturing and distribution.

It has now become evident that the FDA was mainly in charge of “external communications”, to be provided via their public and legislative affairs council – a virtual stamp of approval necessary to assert their ‘safety and effective’ narrative for the US populace.

Despite all this information, we still need to establish beyond the shadow of a doubt that none of the COVID-19 clinical trials data supplied to the FDA represented an actual valid clinical investigation. That proof was provided by independent researcher Katherine Watts from Bailiwick News, a legal expert who dug deep into the legal framework governing the manufacturing of countermeasures under the US government’s Emergency Use Authorization. The 21 U.S. Code § 360bbb -3 – (k) Authorization for Medical Products for use in emergencies in section (k) “Relation to other provisions” is very precise and confirms unequivocally that the use of medical countermeasures within the scope of Emergency Use Authorization, shall not be considered to constitute a clinical investigation.

In other words, this means that none of the data which Pfizer, Moderna and the others provided to the FDA, nor any of the subjects or investigators who participated in these clinical trials – were valid within the frame of the US law.

Unfortunately, there is no other ways to look at this. According to the US Code, these clinical trials never really took place and more likely were conducted for show, and were not bona fide, and therefore were never legally established, nor could they determine the safety or efficacy of these medical countermeasures aka “vaccines.”

The 21 U.S. Code § 360bbb -3 – (k) Authorization for Medical Products for use in emergencies section (k) “Relation to other provisions”:


At this stage, and under such law, I don’t see how the FDA and the CDC can still maintain a narrative where these COVID-19 Medical Countermeasures can ever be described as ‘safe and effective’ since it appears they did not undergo any strict regulatory process, nor did they benefit from current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP), a fact which is well reflected in the manufacturers own data, as well as in the concerns raised by the European Medicines Agency (EMA).

In an article from Health Policy Watch, you can read the following:

The EMA hacked documents shed light on an oft-ignored aspect of vaccine review and approval beyond safety and efficacy – that is quality-assurance of production processes as new vaccine products make the leap from clinical trials to large-scale production”. (see EMA leaked documents story here)

Dr Barbara Mintzes, Associate Professor from the University of Sydney Charles Perkins Centre and School of Pharmacy, and an expert on the interface between clinical research and regulatory decision-making, observed:

I wonder why these issues with production quality were only made public via leaked documents that had become available on the dark web. Why were they not under open and public discussion? These types of exchanges should not be secret”.

The US VAERS data, as well as the Global Vigilance data, shows the horrific consequences following the COVID-19 ‘vaccine’ roll-out, with millions of people injured, and hundreds of thousands of people who have died following their receiving their experimental mRNA vaccine, sometimes within days and weeks after receiving the injections. You might want to bear in mind that these numbers are still very conservative, and in time hopefully we will be able to draw a more accurate picture of the damage caused by these injections.


FDA and The Public Health Emergency Medical Countermeasures Enterprise (PHEMCE)

Now that we have established that the FDA had no business, nor the authority to regulate any of the mRNA ‘vaccine’ research and development, much less the manufacturing of the COVID-19 ‘vaccine’ Countermeasures, it is time to look at the structure that has allowed this unprecedented large-scale theatrical ‘public health’ display to take place over the last 3 years.

None of this performance would have been possible unless a structure was in place to guarantee the level of discretion and secrecy required to maintain the illusion of an ongoing regulatory effort.

This structure has now been identified, and I can only strongly recommend you to watch pharmaceutical R&D and regulatory expert Sasha Latypova’s video, and also check out her Substack which covers this topic in detail. It certainly won’t fail to convince you that something went terribly wrong with the approval of these “COVID-19 Medical Countermeasures.”

The structure is called “The Public Health Emergency Medical Countermeasures Enterprise” (PHEMCE) which coordinates US federal efforts to enhance Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear (CBRN) threats and Emerging Infectious Diseases (EID) preparedness from a ‘Medical Countermeasure’ (MCM) perspective. As its website indicates:

The PHEMCE is composed of multiple agencies across the federal government which works to optimize our preparedness for public health emergencies with respect to the creation, stockpiling, and use of medical countermeasures”.

The Public Health Emergency Medical Countermeasures Enterprise (PHEMCE)

The PHEMCE agencies constitute the perfect “SCIF” where the information stays in a vacuum and only those with a ‘need to know’ security clearance actually get to understand the bigger picture. We must also accept the possibility that many good people within these agencies had no idea what was actually going on, or how they too were duped into believing they were monitoring and regulating real clinical data – when in fact these data could never have been considered nor constituted any legitimate clinical investigation under an EUA.

Characterizing the COVID-19 Countermeasures

Back in 2020, most of us had no idea that the research and development, as well as the manufacturing and deployment of COVID-19 countermeasures, would actually fall under the control of the US Department of Defense and the National Security Council. Instead, most people believed that the COVID response efforts fell under ‘civilian’ agencies like the HSS, CDC, FDA, and NIH. When Trump announced the launch of Operation Warp Speed, the military was presented as the federal body responsible for the logistics associated with the deployment of these COVID-19 countermeasures (vaccines), and not the sole owners of the products, as indicated in their Other Transaction Agreement/Authority (OTA) signed by the vaccines companies involved in the operation.

Suffice to say that very few of us had ever heard the term “Covered Countermeasures” prior COVID-19 pandemic, hence the reason to first characterise these emergency covered countermeasures and see if indeed they rise to the level of “safe and effective,” and who controls them.

Base on what we know today, it is abundantly clear these countermeasures cannot qualify as “safe and effective” pharmaceutical products, and therefore cannot be labeled as such. The fact they are not a prophylactic, or that they do not stop infection or transmission, and that for many people they are dangerous, if not deadly, confirms they belong in an entirely different category.

So what are they?

We have reviewed many theories, and some are still under investigation, including the Bioweapon theory, the depopulation agenda theory, and even the World Economic Forum (WEF) plan to implement a digital control grid through the implementation of vaccine passports for the global population. These theories have a similar dark aura attached to them, but of course it is important to keep our feet on the ground and stick to the facts so that we can better understand the origin of these unprecedented countermeasures, and the intent that lies behind them.

First, let take a look on how the Health Secretary is categorising them before looking into the US legal code.

Covered Countermeasures:

A ‘countermeasure’ is a vaccine, a medication, a device, or other items used to prevent, diagnose, or treat a public health emergency or a security threat.

The Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services has issued federal declarations under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act) that list the countermeasures covered by the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP).

In the declaration of the Secretary of Health on “Covered Countermeasures”, he determines the types of medical countermeasures that are covered by the CICP and declarations have been issued for medical countermeasures against the following:

  • Acute Radiation Syndrome
  • Anthrax
  • Botulinum Toxin
  • COVID-19
  • Ebola
  • Marburg
  • Nerve Agents and Certain Insecticides (Organophophorus and/or Carbamate)
  • Pandemic Influenza
  • Smallpox and other orthopoxviruses (e.g., mpox)
  • Zika

The characterisation of these “Covered Countermeasures” can be found also on the below Declaration Under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act for Medical Countermeasures Against COVID–19.

Section VI. Covered Countermeasures
As noted above, Section III of the Declaration describes the activities (referred to as ‘‘Recommended Activities’’) for which liability immunity is in effect. Section VI of the Declaration identifies the Covered Countermeasures for which the Secretary has recommended such activities. The PREP Act states that a ‘‘Covered Countermeasure’’ must be a ‘‘qualified pandemic or epidemic product,’’ or a ‘‘security countermeasure,’’ as described immediately below; or a drug, biological product or device authorized for emergency use in accordance with Sections 564, 564A, or 564B of the FD&C Act.A ‘qualified’ pandemic or epidemic product may also be a Covered Countermeasure when it is subject to an exemption – that is, it is permitted to be used under an Investigational Drug Application or an Investigational Device Exemption, under the FD&C Act, and is ‘the object of research for possible use for diagnosis, mitigation, prevention, treatment, or cure, or to limit harm of a pandemic or epidemic or serious or life-threatening condition caused by such a drug or device.’A security countermeasure also may be a Covered Countermeasure if it ‘may reasonably be determined to qualify for approval or licensing within 10 years after the Department’s determination that procurement of the countermeasure is appropriate.’As the vaccines were never properly tested or taken through any of the proper legal and lawful regulatory processes designed to protect the public from risk or harm as a result of dangerous products, then the mRNA ‘vaccines’ can only rightly be classed as “prototype” counter measure products – similar to the experimental products given to, or tested on US soldiers
Could the COVID-19 Vaccines actually be Security Covered Countermeasures?

To answer this question we needed to take into consideration the legal framework associated with these “Security Covered Countermeasures” and the subsequent requirements for their manufacturing and deployments.

In the 42 U.S. Code § 247d–6b – Strategic National Stockpile and security countermeasure procurements, in section (B) Security Countermeasure we can find more information, and I invite you to read them below:

In the above document, the Section (4) Call for development of countermeasures: commitment for recommendation for procurement caught our attention, as it is the only Countermeasures which actually requires a Presidential approval.

In effect subsection (A) Proposal to the President indicates that if the Homeland Security Secretary and the Heath Secretary determine that a countermeasure would be appropriate (to respond to a biological threat) but is either ‘currently not developed, or unavailable for procurement as a security countermeasure, or is approved, licensed, or cleared only for alternative uses,’ the Secretaries may jointly submit to the President a proposal to etc….

In subsection (C) Presidential approval:

If the President approves a proposal under subparagraph (A), the Homeland Security Secretary and the Secretary shall make known to persons who may respond to a call for the countermeasure involved:

(i) the call for the countermeasure;

(ii) specifications for the countermeasure under subparagraph (B); and

(iii) the commitment described in subparagraph (A)(ii).

In subsection (V) Product approval:

The contract shall provide that the vendor seek approval, clearance, or licensing of the product from the Secretary; for a timetable for the development of data and other information to support such approval, clearance, or licensing; and that the Secretary may waive part or all of this contract term on request of the vendor or on the initiative of the Secretary.

And finally, you might have noticed that a special reserved fund can be used to finance the R&D, manufacturing and deployment of these “security covered countermeasures” and the definition of this special reserve fund speak for itself…

Special Reserve Fund

(2) The term “special reserve fund” means the “Biodefense Countermeasures” appropriations account, any appropriation made available pursuant to section 321j(a) of title 6, and any appropriation made available pursuant to subsection.

Our understanding so far is that these “securities covered countermeasure” were financed by a special Biodefense Countermeasures reserve fund, and are the only medical countermeasures that require the approval of the President of the United States. In other words, it requires executive authorisation.

To be sure, this is the key mechanism for this entire process.


Did Trump say the quiet part out loud – admitting that he did in fact approve and authorise these military security covered countermeasures?

This is #Trump confirming he was able to get “something” approved that has proven to save a lot of lives

I was able to get the FDA to do things

This confirms these so called vaccines are actually #SecurityCountermeasures as they do require Presidential approval. Don’t be fooled pic.twitter.com/UvhSZUZ8cs

— Freddie Ponton..

(@LFCNewsMedia) January 19, 2023


The results seem clear at this point.


So we have presented our case here, and we now can comfortably say that the FDA only pretended to play the role of a regulator in charge of “safety and efficacy”, when in fact, the FDA and PHEMCE were told what to say and what to do, and what to approve – by the National Security Council and the US Department of Defense.

There was never a clinical investigation of the said vaccines, and the PHEMCE COVID cabal lured the world into believing these Biodefense Security Covered Countermeasures were somehow “safe and effective.” Clearly, they were not.

Based on this discovery, our recommendation would be that all PHEMCE senior officials must be fully interrogated in official hearings, as well as all those with statutory positions at the National Security Council, and all other department heads who were in charge of these countermeasures at the US Department of Defense.

Unfortunately, simply going after Pfizer, Moderna and the other pharmaceutical firms will likely prove to be difficult at the federal level, but not impossible if willful misconduct can be proven and established, and subsequently used as a basis for prosecution. In terms of the US justice system, our best hope may lie at the state level were an independent inquiry can be carried out by state judges and appointed oversight committees – free of federal interference. These results can then be used to leverage new and broader challenges at the federal level.

In our next report, we will cover the European response to COVID-19, and see how this new emerging information impacts the narrative that was extensively promoted on the other side of the Atlantic. We will try to identify the US DoD counterparts and helpers in Europe, and analyze the role of the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and its questionable behavior and potential responsibility in their capacity as European regulators.

All we can say for now is that: “Nothing is What It Seems….”


Edited by Macnamara
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/22/2021 at 2:21 PM, Macnamara said:

Book Review Part 1:

The People V's the State, Using Jury Nullification to Defeat Unjust Laws by Luke Von Trapp


This book was recommended by the gentlemen at the UKColumn in their 'A Dissident's Guide to the Constitution' series. The author has his own podcast 'the uncivil liberty' in which he discuss the topic of Liberty. It's a bite sized book that can be knocked off in an afternoons reading and is clear and easy to understand although it needs a bit of editing as there are some small errors but then i can't talk as my grammar is terrible (it's the info inside that matters!)


The author is based in the US but the concept of jury nullification is historically rooted in British common Law. It's definately worth a read and I'll post some excerpts from it below to give a flavour of what Luke is trying to get across to the reader:




'If you've heard about it and are not fighting for it to be implemented in our system, then something is wrong for sure. It is one of the core fundamental rights provided to us by the Constitution, and we have an obligation to use it to invalidate bad laws ratified by corrupt politicians in legislative bodies. Jury nullification is one of the rare ways to fight against the abuse of power, primarily by the law enforcement and the corrupt legal system they support.'


'Jury nullification is a constitutional doctrine which allows jurors to acquit criminal defendants who are technically guilty, but who do not deserve punishment. It occurs in a trial when a jury reaches a verdict contrary to the judge's instructions as to the law' (CopBlock)


'Simply put, the jury holds the most power in determining the validity of the law and whether it has the right to stand. Furthermore, jury nullification prevents unjust laws from being enforced even if the person standing trial has admitted to committing the 'crime'. It sends a message to the legislative 'masters' of the people that they do not agree and refuse to convict as the law is unfit to stand. Jury nullification is a vote of non-confidence on the credibility of the law and those who profit off making these laws and the courts despise it.'


Von Trapp gives real world examples of jury nullification and makes the point that people who feel that certain drug laws or abuse of police power are affecting certain sub sections of the population disproportionately, should learn about jury nullification as the solution to these problems for example if a person is on trial for distributing marijuana then the jury could acquit him if they believe that a non violent act that is technically illegal but which causes no victim should not result in a conviction.


This method of allowing a person to be judged by a jury of their peers is an ancient tradition going back 700 years in british common law history and the book does cover that.


The book stresses the need for jurors to act out of conscience to ensure justice and not to simply follow the letter of the law as the judge may demand. It also contain a good quote from Martin Luther King:


'I became convinced that noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good'


How prescient in our current covid-hysteria predicament


The British Constitution Part 7: The power is in our hands




Who holds ULTIMATE POWER in Britain? Constitution expert explains the country's current situation


  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why don't you want to get your fifth booster jab karl?


You should be careful there man, if you don't want to be accused of anti-semitism then you should definately get yourself down to your local covid centre and get your fifth jab:

‘Fit and healthy people are dropping down with heart issues’: Karl Stefanovic blasts fifth booster call

Karl Stefanovic has shocked viewers by blasting the fifth booster shot recommendation, declaring he is “done with the vaccine”.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...