Jump to content

Cap'n Mac's Pirate Republic!


Recommended Posts

On 1/7/2023 at 4:14 PM, Macnamara said:

People who heat their houses using fires or stoves likely only use 'heating' for about 5 to 5.5 months of the year and not around the clock whereas people who use central heating and thermostats likely heat their house non stop.


I'm envious of you having solid fuel heating Mac, we live in a smokeless zone and don't even have a proper fireplace. Surely wood fires are net zero carbon because they're only releasing the co2 back into the atmosphere which the tree absorbed from it in the recent past. I suppose fossil fuels are doing that too but their carbon was absorbed millions of years ago instead, so they're still carbon neutral in that sense. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
21 hours ago, Campion said:

I'm envious of you having solid fuel heating Mac, we live in a smokeless zone and don't even have a proper fireplace.


like anything there are pros and cons. There's a fair bit of effort involved depending on how much you prep your own fuel. Its about 12 quid for a couple of packs of kindling so i chop my own but that takes time....


modern society has embraced comfort as a highest ideal. I'm not sure that comfort should outrank other things though like: freedom, self-sufficiency, meaning and purpose. We need the pendulum to swing back the other way


21 hours ago, Campion said:

Surely wood fires are net zero carbon because they're only releasing the co2 back into the atmosphere which the tree absorbed from it in the recent past.


interesting point! With the wet wood and coal it seems to be the particulates that some people are worried about. Well dried wood apparently burns more completely and smokeless coal is meant to be cleaner so those are steps that can be taken, short of fitting coal scrubbers to everyones chimneys!

Edited by Macnamara
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/7/2023 at 8:06 PM, Macnamara said:

Ray McGovern: On Tucker Carlson's Report of the CIA's Role in JFK's Murder


JFK Speech on Secret Societies


Eisenhower Farewell Address - Military Industrial Complex


Edited by Macnamara
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/10/2022 at 9:22 PM, Macnamara said:

The Dialectic


.....the IRS being given $80 billion by the biden regime to create 87,000 new agents no doubt to wield the tens of thousands of weapons and the hundreds of thousands of rounds that the IRS has been buying up to prepare to wage war against the american taxpayer

In 2022, The IRS Went After The Very Poorest Taxpayers

On Wednesday, Syracuse University’s Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) released data provided to it by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) on audits performed by the agency in fiscal year 2022. Despite the infusion of new funding earmarked for the IRS via last year’s Inflation Reduction Act, the agency continued historic trends of hassling primarily low-income taxpayers, with relatively few millionaires and billionaires getting caught up in the audit sweep.

“The taxpayer class with unbelievably high audit rates—five and a half times virtually everyone else—were low-income wage-earners taking the earned income tax credit,” reported TRAC, noting that the poorest taxpayers are “easy marks in an era when IRS increasingly relies upon correspondence audits yet doesn’t have the resources to assist taxpayers or answer their questions.”


In fact, “if one ignores the fiction of auditing a millionaire through simply sending a letter through the mail, the odds that millionaires received a regular audit by a revenue agent (1.1%) was actually less than the audit rate of the targeted lowest income wage-earners whose audit rate was 1.27 percent!”

The Inflation Reduction Act, passed in August 2022, directed $80 billion worth of new funding over the next decade to the IRS so it could hire 87,000 new workers, purportedly to better target millionaire and billionaire scofflaws. The Biden administration and credulous journalists claimed that this would in no way increase audits for those making under $400,000 annually—suspect assurances not provided within the text of the actual bill. This increased capacity meant only those at the top would be targeted, supporters insisted. But this ignores how the IRS’s incentives work and how agencywide reform might be too heavy of a lift.

Correspondence audits—which are conducted via mail, and are the type frequently used when interacting with the poorest of taxpayers—are much easier and cheaper to conduct than other types of audits. Plus, the earned income tax credit is easy to get wrong. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates that new hires with experience in the field will take almost three years of ramp-up time, with more junior new hires taking longer. The lag time between 2022’s infusion of funding, and legitimately increased capacity, will be enormous—if the agency can even snag the best in the industry when TurboTax and H&R Block will surely be swelling their own ranks. It makes sense that, given a dearth of experienced auditors not likely to be fixed soon, the agency would rely on the easiest and least time-consuming types of audits.



Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Digitization Of Humanity Shows Why The Globalist Agenda Is Evil

January 10, 2023

In recent weeks I’ve been seeing an interesting narrative fallacy being sold to the general public when it comes to the designs of globalists. The mainstream media and others are now openly suggesting that it’s actually okay to be opposed to certain aspects of groups like the World Economic Forum. They give you permission to be concerned, just don’t dare call it conspiracy.

This propaganda is a deviation from the abject denials we’re accustomed to hearing in the Liberty Movement for the past decade or more. We have all been confronted with the usual cognitive dissonance – the claims that globalist groups “just sit around talking about boring economic issues” and nothing they do has any bearing on global politics or your everyday life. In some cases we were even told that these groups of elites “don’t exist.”

Now, the media is admitting that, yes, perhaps the globalists do have more than just a little influence over governments, social policies and economic outcomes. But, what the mainstream doesn’t like is the assertion that globalists have nefarious or authoritarian intentions. That’s just crazy tinfoil hat talk, right?


The reason for the narrative shift is obvious. Far too many people witnessed the true globalist agenda in action during the pandemic lockdowns and now they see the conspiracy for what it is. The globalists, in turn, seem to have been shocked to discover many millions of people in opposition to the mandates and the refusals to comply were clearly far greater than they expected. They are still trying to push their brand of covid fear, but the cat is out of the bag now.

They failed to get what they wanted in the West, which was a perpetual Chinese-style medical tyranny with vaccine passports as the norm. So, the globalist strategy has changed and they are seeking to adapt. They admit to a certain level of influence, but they pretend as if they are benevolent or indifferent.

The response to this lie is relatively straightforward. I could point out how Klaus Schwab of the WEF savored the thrill of the initial pandemic outbreak and declared that covid was the perfect “opportunity” to initiate what the WEF calls the “Great Reset.”

I could also point out that Klaus Schwab’s vision of the Reset, what he calls the “4th Industrial Revolution,” is a veritable nightmare world in which Artificial Intelligence runs everything, society is condensed into digital enclaves called “smart cities” and people are oppressed by carbon taxation. I could point out that the WEF actively supports the concept of the “Shared Economy” in which you will “own nothing, have no privacy” and you will supposedly be happy about it, but only because you won’t have any other choice.

What I really want to talk about, however, is the process by which the elites hope to achieve their dystopian epoch, as well as the globalist mindset which lends itself to the horrors of technocracy. The common naive assumption among skeptics of conspiracy is that the globalists are regular human beings with the same drives and limited desires as the rest of us. They might have some power, but world events are still random and certainly not controlled.

This is a fallacy. The globalists are not like us. They are not human. Or, I should say, they despise humanity and seek to do away with it. And, because of this, they have entirely different aspirations compared to the majority of us which include aspirations of dominance.

What we are dealing with here are not normal people with conscience, ethics or empathy. Their behavior is much more akin to higher functioning psychopaths and sociopaths rather than the everyday person on the street. We saw this on full display during the covid lockdowns and the vicious attempts to enforce vaccine passports; their actions betray their long game.

Take a look at comments by New Zealand’s prime minister and WEF attendee, Jacinda Ardern, from a year ago. She admits to the deliberate tactic of creating a two-tier class system within her own country based on vaccination status. There is no remorse or guilt in her demeanor, she is proud of taking such authoritarian actions despite numerous studies that prove the mandates are ineffective.


Beyond the covid response, though, I suggest people who deny globalist conspiracy take a deeper dive into the philosophical roots of organizations like the WEF. Their entire ideology can be summed up in a couple words – futurism and godhood.

Futurism is an ideological movement which believes that all “new” innovations, social or technological, should supplant the previous existing systems for the sake of progress. They believe that all old ways of thinking, including notions of principles, heritage, religious belief systems, codes of conduct, etc. are crutches holding humanity back from greatness.

But what is the greatness the futurists seek? As mentioned above, they want godhood. An era in which the natural world and human will is enslaved by the hands of a select few. Case in point – The following presentation from 2018 by WEF “guru” Yuval Harari on the future of humanity as the globalists see it:


Harari’s conclusions are rooted in elitist biases and ignore numerous psychological and social realities, but we can set those aside for a moment and examine his basic premise that humanity as we know it will no longer exist in the next century because of “digital evolution” and “human hacking.”

The foundation of the WEF vision is built on the idea that data is the new Holy Grail, the new conquest. This is something I have written about extensively in the past (check out my article ‘Artificial Intelligence: A Secular Look At The Digital Antichrist’) but it is good to see it expressed with such arrogance by someone like Harari because it is undeniable evidence – the globalists think they are going to build a completely centralized economy and society based on human data rather than production. In other words, YOU become the product. The average citizen, your thoughts and your behaviors, become the stock in trade.

Globalists also believe that data is most valuable because it can be exploited to control people’s behaviors, to hack the body and mind in order to create human puppets, or create super-beings. They dream of becoming little gods with omnipotent knowledge. Yuval even proudly proclaims that intelligent design will no longer be the realm of God in heaven, but of the new digitized man.

While Harari pays lip service to “democracy” vs “digital dictatorship,” he goes on to assert that centralization may become the de facto system of governance. He says this not because he fears dictatorship, but because that has always been the WEF’s intent. The globalist argues that governments cannot be trusted to hold a monopoly on the digital wellspring and that someone needs to step in to regulate data; but “who would do this?” he asks.

He already knows the answer. The UN, a globalist edifice, has consistently said it should be the governing body that takes control of AI and data regulation through UNESCO. That is to say, Harari is playing coy, he knows that the people who will step in to control the data are people just like him.

At no point in Harari’s speech does he suggest that that any of these developments should be obstructed or stopped. At no point does he offer the idea that the digitization of humanity is wrong and that there are other better ways of living. He actually mocks the concept of “going back” to old ways; only the future and the Tabula Rasa (blank slate) hold promise for the globalists, everything else is an impediment to their designs.

But here’s the thing: what the globalists are trying to accomplish is a fantasy. People are not algorithms, despite how much Harari would like them to be. People have habits, yes, but they are also unpredictable and are prone to sudden awakenings and epiphanies in the moment of crisis.

Psychopaths tend to be robotic people, acting impulsively but also very predictably. They lack imagination, intuition and foresight, and so it’s not surprising that organizations of psychopaths like the WEF would place such an obsessive value on AI, algorithms and a cold technocratic evolution. They don’t view their data Shangri-La as humanity’s future; they see it as THEIR future – the future of the non-humans, or the anti-humans as it were.

Who will produce all the goods, services and necessities required in this brave new world? Well, all of us peons, of course. Sure, the globalists will offer grand promises of a robot-driven production economy in which people no longer need to engage in menial labor, but this will be another lie. They’ll still need people to plant the crops, maintain infrastructure, take care of manufacturing, do their fighting for them, etc.; they’ll just need less of us.

At bottom, an economy built on data is an economy dependent on illusion.

Data is vaporous and oftentimes meaningless because it is subject to the biases of the interpreter. Algorithms can also be programmed to the biases of the engineers. There is nothing inherently objective about data – it is all dependent on the intentions of the people analyzing it.

For example, to use Harari’s anecdote of an algorithm that “knows you are gay” before you do: any twisted group of people could simply write code for an algorithm that tells the majority of easily manipulated kids that they are gay, even when they are not. And, if you are gullible enough to believe the algorithm is infallible, then you could be led to believe that numerous falsehoods are true and be convinced to behave against your nature. You have allowed a biased digital phantom to dictate your identity, and have made yourself “hackable.”

In the meantime, the elitists entertain delusions of surpassing their mortal limitations by “hacking” the human body, as well as reading the minds of the masses and predicting the future based on data trends. This is an obsession which ignores the unpredictable wages of the human soul, that very element of conscience and of imagination which psychopaths lack. It’s something that cannot be hacked.

The legitimacy of the data-based system and the hacking of humanity that the WEF aspires to is less important than what the masses can be convinced of. If the average person can be persuaded to implant their cell phone in their skull in the near future, then yes, humanity might become hackable in a rudimentary way.

The algorithms then supplant conscience, empathy and principles.  And, without these things all morality becomes relative by default.  Evil becomes good, and good becomes evil.

By the same token, if humanity can be persuaded to set down their cell phones and live a less tech-focused life, then the digital empire of the globalists comes crashing down quite easily. There is no system the elites can impose that would make their digital consciousness a reality without the consent of the public at large.

Without a vast global framework in which people willingly embrace the algorithms rather than their own experience and intuitions, the globalist religion of total centralization dies. The first step is to accept that the conspiracy does indeed exist. The second step is to accept that the conspiracy is malicious and destructive. The third step is to refuse to comply, by whatever means necessary.



  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

An Army in Waiting


Some truthers seem to be anticipating a sudden upswell of outrage from the jabbed portion of the population as they come to the painful realisation that they have been hoodwinked into taking a toxic bioweapon under false pretenses of a dangerous 'pandemic' that was allegedly a threat to their lives. I really hope this happens but I also see that it is a painful reality to wake upto. Imagine the stress of suddenly believing that you have been injected with a bioweapon designed to make your body turn against itself so that every day of your life moving forward is a kind of russian roulette. My experience of people in general is that truth is not their highest ideal and that as a rule of thumb people believe what they WANT to believe. Everyone understands that justice is the equal application of objective principles of morality and yet in practice people will usually side in disputes with the person they are allied to or most identify with. We see these divisions time and time again on the hot button news stories like george floyd for example; some will say 'he was a victim of police brutality' whilst others will say 'he was a dirty drug dealer who was high on fentanyl' but maybe the truth is sometimes a bit of both.


People tend to believe in what they WANT to believe and what they WANT to believe is invariably what is least painful for their ego to deal with. In the age of 'intersectionality' people have split into small tribes that see 'justice' or rather 'social justice' as merely whatever is in the narrow interests of their own small tribe. The government has played on this by creating further divisions during the covid-era by pitting the jabbed against those evil 'anti-vaxxers' who the jabbed puritans are informed are 'anti-science' as if science is something that is always 'settled' rather than being simply a method to be used to explore physical reality in which case it is never really 'settled' but rather on a never ending journey of discovery and evolution. The jabbed were pulled into the embrace of big brother government by being told 'we are all in this together' and encouraged to bang their pots and pans as an open display of virtue signalling to their neighbours which by default then also exposed and shamed those in the street who did not comply. But how often was 'we are all in it together' really just a smokescreen for more selfish goals such as 'i just want to be able to go on holiday' or 'i want to be able to attend music concerts and events with my friends' or 'i was afraid for my job' etc?


Perhaps the alarming trend asserting itself in this new woke-covid-bio-security state era is the prevention of debate. We were simply not allowed to publically debate the nature of the threat from 'covid 19' symptoms (an umbrella term they used to describe flu-like symptoms which they claimed were caused not by the flu, which dissapeared during the scamdemic but by a novel coronavirus they called 'sars cov2'). Neither were we allowed to debate whether or not there should be a national roll out of experimental mRNA gene therapy injections given 'emergency authorisation' before the testing phase was complete thereby turning the entire nations population into a giant medical experiment. In the second world war nazi scientists like josef mengele carried out experimentations on human beings and some people gave the excuse when under trial at nuremburg after the war that they were 'just following orders'. This excuse was deemed INVALID and that a person should exercise their own personal conscience and be held accountable for their individual actions. Despite these well publicised events doctors and nurses up and down this country carried out a giant medical experiment on the british people under the excuse that they were just following orders from the government or the 'protocols' of their hospital, practice or trust.


Even prior to the covid jab roll outs we were told that the 'science' on climate change was 'settled' and that we were not allowed to debate it or else we would face a slew of nasty slurs such as 'climate denier', 'tinfoil hat wearer' etc etc. Climate has always changed but the question is whether or not manmade CO2 is the primary driver of that change but we were told that debate could not take place. But why if they are so sure of their position would they be afraid of debate? Surely if 'the science' is so 'settled' then that debate would be an easy win for them? Is it possible that the sun might play a part in the earths climate? Is it true that CO2 doesn't drive climate change but in fact lags behind it as a product of it? Surely these questions and more besides need to be answered before we make vast changes that might cause great harm to billions of people?


As we see the public being distracted by the harry and megan circus the government is quietly using the border force and RNLI to taxi tens of thousands of military aged men over the british channel before paying to house them in hotels whilst paying them a weekly stipend. Why are they doing this? To cross over to french waters and then pick people up and bring them to british ports is a breach of sea rescue protocol which is to return stranded people at sea to the nearest port which would be in france. So why are they doing this? If the migrants were war refugees then they would be mostly comprised of women and children as the men would have remained to fight and yet there are barely any women and children. So is it possible the british deep state is quietly building an army in waiting that they intend to use for some nefarious purpose? Obviously they doubt the willingness of british soldiers to carry out hostile acts against their own countrymen and women, families and communities so it looks like they are recruiting mercenaries to carry out some sort of hostile act against the british people. Could such a force be used to enforce another covid lockdown? Could they be used to impose mandatory jabs roll outs on everyone who does not have a special pass? Could they be there to maintain order in the event of an economic breakdown which would be accelerated by the cost of housing and feeding the migrant army in waiting?


Whilst a mercenary army carried out hostile actions against the british people what would the british soldiers be doing? Would they stand idly by whilst the british people were aggressively policed by foreign forces? This would require the british soldiers to be removed from british soil. One way to do this would be to jab them all with a bioweapon that will kill or wound them thereby rendering them null as a fighting force. Another method would be to deploy them abroad so that they are simply not here to defend the british people. An excuse for such mass deployments could include a war against russia or china.




  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes I was thinking this last bit ,it does look suspicious ! (Especially if the boats and engines being sent back to France in lorries?)

I take it this is happening in Ireland too? 

So we got geo engineering

,bio engineering

 and cultural engineering

But long planned and bragged about in old books and meetings .





Edited by Talorgan
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/29/2022 at 7:08 PM, Macnamara said:

The coming extinction of General Practitioners


Some GP's might be feeling a little smug at the moment as they receive obscene amounts of money for patient consultations that aren't even face to face where they simply type in the symptoms that the patient describes into their computer which then tells them what big pharma drug to prescribe them. Then there are the financial rewards given to them for administering covid bioweapon EXPERIMENTAL jabs to the public.


However the reality is that if they are just a voice on the end of a telephone then what is going to happen is that artificial intelligence will study their patient interactions and then it will replace them as it too can simply record symptoms into the system and prescribe drugs over the phone. GP's then are soon to become redundant....watch this space....

WFH family doctor conducts online consultations from her Cornish home that's 260 MILES away from patients: Fury as GP works 'remotely' despite West Sussex surgery in 'high demand'

  • Dr Justine Hall is one of three doctors at Rudgwick Medical Centre near Horsham
  • Patients left furious after discovering she works from other side of the country
  • Surgery says NHS health bosses 'have supported remote working in our area'

By Tom Pyman For Mailonline

Published: 09:26 GMT, 29 November 2022 | Updated: 15:16 GMT, 29 November 2022

A GP has been conducting online consultations for patients at her West Sussex surgery some 260 miles away from the comfort of her £585,000 Cornish home, it emerged today.

Dr Justine Hall is one of three doctors listed as working at Rudgwick Medical Centre near Horsham, West Sussex, and has her name in bold lettering on the gold nameplate outside the surgery.

The surgery has recently been experiencing 'high demand' for its services, according to a recorded message from Dr Hall herself on its phone system.

It comes as national data last week revealed that one in five patients waited more than two weeks to be seen — an all-time high.






The Secret War: How our world and the medical landscape has been transformed

By Dr. Guy Hatchard

A paper was published on 5 January outlining a study completed in Taiwan. A survey of Electrocardiogram (“ECG”) parameters after the Pfizer Covid shot found that 17.1% of senior high school students had at least one cardiac symptom after the second vaccine dose, mostly chest pain and palpitations. 1% of students returned abnormal ECG measurements. The study concluded: 

Cardiac symptoms are common after the second dose of BNT162b2 (Pfizer) vaccine, but the incidences of significant arrhythmias and myocarditis are only 0.1%.

85% of the estimated 500,000 12–18-year-olds have been vaccinated in New Zealand. 0.1% of this number is 425 children whom the study estimates will have had “significant arrhythmias and myocarditis,” while 4,250 would have returned an “abnormal ECG,” and17,625 who will have had “at least one cardiac symptom.”

My immediate issue is with the use of the term only in the conclusion. Many of these cases will have gone undetected and untreated, or worse dismissed out of hand by doctors as insignificant or due to anxiety. Left untreated, some of these kids are likely to go on to develop serious complications that may leave them vulnerable to sudden cardiac events and even death.

If you follow Twitter closely as some of our researchers do for us, you will have noticed that a number of qualified doctors are very busy on Twitter dismissing concerns. After the sudden collapse of a college basketball star on the field, Tweeters who were present at the game expressing concern (who didn’t mention vaccination) were nevertheless rapidly attacked for making a fuss about “nothing.” According to many doctors, sudden collapse during sports is now normal and nothing to worry about??? 

How has this happened?

You must have noticed a worrying trend increasing over the last few decades. When you visit some doctors, they seem to spend more time looking at their computer than they do questioning or looking at you. This is because the Ministry of Health has linked them with databases allowing them to enter symptoms and ask the computer what tests to run and what pills to prescribe. A sort of lazy man’s approach to doctoring, largely controlled by pharmaceutical firms. 

It is no surprise to realise that the “treatment” (???) of covid vaccine injury has also been automated in this way. Doctors have been prompted to treat chest pains, palpitations, and shortness of breath as normal outcomes of vaccination. They never were before covid Pfizer vaccines. Previously these symptoms would have prompted a call for an ambulance. The variety of ways that concerns are dismissed is mind-boggling. CBS News reports in the first week of January that five college basketball players were hospitalised in Chicago following a workout. Incredibly the coach was blamed and removed. 

The bigger picture

Increasingly authorities, politicians, and doctors have allowed themselves to fall into the hands of information supplied directly to their computers by operators with commercial and political agendas. Many of these operators are working in a global space outside of the boundaries of national regulation, and they directly control medical agendas via sophisticated databases pushing suspect information. You are no doubt aware that Big Pharma is fully involved.  Concerning Pfizer trial outcomes were kept well away from public view. Incredibly, military and spy agencies have also become involved and are possibly contributing to the advice your local doctor is offering you about Covid.

During the first Gulf War (1990-91) the US military suspected troops might face damage from deadly nerve agents like sarin. Soldiers were issued pyridostigmine bromide pills and vaccinated against anthrax. More than one-third of returning veterans suffered from Gulf War Syndrome, a chronic and multi-symptomatic disorder.  A wide range of acute and chronic symptoms have been linked to it, including fatigue, muscle pain, cognitive problems, insomnia, rashes and diarrhoea. The causes of Gulf War Syndrome have never been determined.

I am using this example not to point the finger at any cause, but rather to suggest that the US military has a long history of involvement with Big Pharma. The pharmaceutical industry is a military contractor. Recently discussion and evidence have surfaced that the US Department of Defence (“DoD”) has been closely involved with the formulation and promotion of pandemic policy. Why? Left-wing, pro-vaccine news platform Politico reports:

Officials are launching a new plan to develop medical treatments, vaccines and personal protective equipment that can adapt to a range of evolving biological and chemical threats,”said Ian Watson, DoD’s deputy assistant secretary for chemical and biological defence.

This new military approach to medicine is officially named the ‘Chemical and Biological Defense Program’s Enhanced Medical Countermeasures Approach’. The move involves the development of tests, treatments and vaccines for a range of as-yet-unknown threats. Its introduction marks a shift in strategy for the DoD.

According to Ian Watson, “the change in approach has been shaped in large part by the Covid-19 pandemic. It can be impossible to tell whether a new threat is naturally occurring or intentionally manipulated by adversaries, but either way, the countermeasures are often the same.” 

Evidently all along there has been a US suspicion that covid-19 is actually an escaped bioweapon. If that is the case, the close involvement of the military in our future medical services is a given. Military thinking is quite different from civilian thinking. Military thinking involves inevitable casualties. As Tennyson said: “Theirs not to reason why, theirs but to do and die.”  With this in mind, it is no surprise that the medical profession has changed gears and now insists that nothing has gone wrong – excess all-cause mortality in highly vaccinated nations is simply the cost of final victory.

Biotechnology doesn’t work

The fly in the ointment of this wacky philosophy is the risk of biotechnology itself. Apparently, no one has informed the top military brass that biotech doesn’t actually work, it kills people, any people, whether they are friends or foes, Russian, Chinese, or American. Moreover, it is an offensive/defensive weapon like no other, once launched it can’t be recalled, it goes on killing people indefinitely. 

It appears to me that the military is as much a victim of biotechnology misinformation as everyone else is. You can make money out of biotechnology whether it works or not, whether it helps or kills people. You simply have to keep the investment dollars, the government grants, and the military contracts rolling in. You do this by making wild promises that you can’t keep. 

By the time it becomes clear that your product doesn’t work and actually harms people, you have a new product ready to go and a new set of promises. Technology moves so fast that the government, the medical profession, and the military can never catch up. They are in a state of constant fear driven by people writing sexy public relations drivel that arrives on official-looking letterhead on everyone’s desktop. All at the push of a button. And the writers are very well paid to do so. They probably also write the scripts for fanciful quasi-medical Sci-Fi epics that pollute our televisions with stories of miracle cures engineered by white-coated scientists and hunky heroes. None of this exists.

In truth, the failure and risk of biotechnology are a dirty secret that is being kept from us. When trusting school children were told they needed to get the covid vaccine in order to participate in school activities, no one told them that 17.1% would experience a cardiac symptom whose final outcome was unknown. No one told them that they were being signed up as subjects in an experiment. No one told them or their parents that they had virtually no risk from covid infection, but a measurable and significant risk subsequent to vaccination. No one told them that many medical professionals would ignore or dismiss them if they suffered a vaccine injury. It is hard to escape the notion that school children have become cannon fodder in a secret war orchestrated by biotech dreamers and misguided military planners not too dissimilar from Dr. Strangelove.

About the Author

Guy Hatchard, PhD, was formerly a senior manager at Genetic ID a global food testing and safety company (now known as FoodChain ID). You can subscribe to his websites HatchardReport.com and GLOBE.GLOBAL for regular updates by email. GLOBE.GLOBAL is a website dedicated to providing information about the dangers of biotechnology.


  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



There is a horrific story doing the rounds of a jewish lady in germany who survived the holocaust who is now being threatened by the german state with being force jabbed with the covid jabs which is an absolute disgrace.

Germany orders Holocaust survivor institutionalized over Covid-19 shot

by RT


Isn't it interesting how the truthers who are often maligned as being 'anti-semites' are the ones standing up for the human rights of this jewish lady whilst those very same hypocrites that throw around all the accusations like 'anti-semite' are the very people trying to impose this covid tyranny on everyone including this poor lady?


Myself i see the conspiracy as an OCCULT conspiracy at its heart. I believe that there is embedded (hiding within) within judaism a heretical sabbatean cult. That cult has also embedded itself within other religions though for example its leader sabbatai zevi openly converted to islam and many of his followers in turkey followed suit and became the 'donmeh' who were crypto-sabbateans who practiced their own dark religion behind closed doors whilst outwardly professing to be muslims. Its possible that the young turks were tied to this cult and that the cult seized control of the country. I think sabbateans are also embedded within the christian church and many catholics attest to a takeover of the vatican (see for example sedevacantalism)


As these sabbateans hide their true beliefs it then becomes a job to separate the wheat from the chaff. Many conspirators clearly carry jewish surnames and some that don't have changed their surnames in the past to hide their origins.  This all provides them with cover for their actions as they hide behind the holocaust and slurs of 'anti-semitism'; it gives them a shield behind which they can carry on their operations whilst demonising those that expose their actions.


My personal views about nazism is that I am opposed to it in the same way that i am opposed to all forms of collectivism such as marxism. I agree with Prof Suttons view that the banksters funded not only the bolsheviks but also the nazis to create a hegelian dialectic that is still visible in politics today in order to play both ends against the middle: the middle being law abiding people just trying to raise families and live in peace with their neighbours.


The aim of a hegelian dialectic being to create a third-way 'synthesis' out of the conflict which i strongly suggest is the 'great reset', UN sustainable goals, globalised technocracy. If you disagree with this preprepared and long planned for solution then by their faux-logic you must be a filthy nazi! But how about we don't let these fascists who control the global corporations such as the weapons manufacturers, big pharma, banks and central banks dictate to us what is wrong or right? Considering they funded the bolsheviks and the nazis they don't have a moral leg to stand on.





Edited by Macnamara
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Net Zero is Marxism Dressed Up as Environmentalism

Late last year, Melissa Fleming, Under-Secretary for Global Communications at the United Nations, told a World Economic Forum ‘Disinformation’ seminar that we “own the science” around climate change, and we think the world should know it, so we partnered with Google to ensure only UN results appear. Needless to say, this arrogant claim merely hints at the scale of disinformation practised by global elites in pushing numerous messages designed to spread fearful command-and-control societal propaganda.

PR Flak Fleming also noted that the UN worked with Tik Tok on a project called ‘Team Halo’ to boost Covid messaging. This was said to be another trusted messenger project, “where we trained scientists around the world and some doctors on Tik Tok, and we had TikTok working with us”.

With climate, as with some of the Covid narrative, science has long taken a back seat. Any scientific findings that suggest human-produced carbon dioxide is not the overriding thermostat that determines the Earth’s climate are either insulted or ignored. Only ‘settled’ science messages from presumably ‘trained’ scientists are allowed. It is perhaps no accident that Google’s capture by the UN came at a time when it ‘demonetised’ a blog detailing the global satellite temperature record. This work by two scientists at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, is the most accurate record of global temperature. As we have seen, it shows considerably less warming since 1979 than surface datasets, that have been adjusted upwards on a retrospective basis. Google took its action on the patently false grounds that the page was supplying “harmful claims“.

Of course, much of this narrative is indicative of a desire by elites in an inter-connected world to enforce more controlling collectivism on local and international populations. Green politics mostly arose on the Left, attracting activists who have always sought collectivist approaches to often messy, individualistic human activities.

We must be grateful to the Guardian for providing a ‘long read’ (how your correspondent suffers for his art) detailing the way that political activists infiltrate the climate debate in order to push this long-cherished, capitalism-hating political narrative. “One of the goals of system change is to supersede individual virtue,” writes U.S. correspondent Rebecca Solnit (pictured). By “individual virtue”, of course, she means individual choice. “Electrification will have happened because of the collective action that takes shape as policy and regulation,” she adds.

Solnit quotes the climate writer Mary Heglar, who suggests that for too long the climate fight has been limited to scientists and policy experts. What we “desperately need” are more artists. Solnit suggests “winning” the popular imagination by providing new stories on climate. Already, she says that “climate denial” has been rendered largely obsolete by climate-driven catastrophes promoted by activists and journalists. By this, she refers to the non-stop pseudoscientific attribution of every bad weather event to humans burning fossil fuel. We have to find stories of a liveable future, “stories of popular power that motivate people to do what it takes to make the world we need”, urges Solnit.

Stories, it might be noted, that persuade people to give up products that work like gas boilers and internal combustion engines, in favour of manifestly inferior substitutes. Stories, for instance, as spun by Solnit, that suggest mining for lithium and cobalt will be an “inevitable part of building renewables”. Thus important questions over the finite supplies of both these materials, and the use of children to mine cobalt, are conveniently ignored. It is estimated that 225 tonnes of the Earth’s crust must be disturbed to supply just one 1,000 pound car battery, but Solnit points to the “far vaster scale and impact of fossil fuel mining”. Of course it can be argued that the modern-day extraction of oil and gas is a remarkably clean process, requiring little more than a hole in the ground. No children need die in the process.

Old-school Marxists have always relied on demonising the rich to promise a better future for all. So Solnit runs with the story that we need to punish the rich with their large carbon footprints, and “the global majority don’t need to change much”. This is highly disingenuous. Lifestyle changes proposed by green elites become more extreme by the month – this month, meat off the menu because cows fart, next month, dangerous fertilisers and farms impounded. Billions of people will be affected by diet, travel and energy bans and restrictions, and billions more will be denied the life-enhancing progress enjoyed in the industrialised countries over the last 200 years.

Last year, green elites were shocked by polling evidence that suggested four in ten people across five continents believed climate change was mainly due to natural causes. This despite decades of climate catastrophising to promote Net Zero policies. The 30-country IPSOS survey found that the level of climate scepticism was very similar in all age categories, but there was wide divergence when political leanings were taken into account. Across seven countries surveyed, 28% of supporters of the Left were sceptical of human-caused climate change, a figure that rose to 50% of those on the Right.

The underlying climate message is hard-core Marxist. Recognising the reality of climate breakdown means limiting the freedom of the individual “in the name of the wellbeing of the collective”, Solnit states. There is another way to count wealth and abundance for the many including “meaningful work and purposeful lives”, she suggests.

You will be happy in your work and prosperous, declared the Communist posters of old. “They pretend to pay us, and we pretend to work”, muttered citizens of the old Soviet Union quietly among themselves.

Chris Morrison is the Daily Sceptic’s Environment Editor.


  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In this clip Neil makes the point that the excess deaths which he seems to be saying are now upto 50,000 in the Uk are also being found in high numbers in other countries. This of course obliterates the argument of the branch-covidians who argue that the excess deaths are being caused by lack of ambulances and disruptions to the NHS. But if the excess deaths are occuring in all the countries that had a covid jab roll out then they can't all be blamed on a failing NHS...

What’s going on with excess deaths?


  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Macnamara said:

Myself i see the conspiracy as an OCCULT conspiracy at its heart. I believe that there is embedded (hiding within) within judaism a heretical sabbatean cult. That cult has also embedded itself within other religions though for example its leader sabbatai zevi openly converted to islam and many of his followers in turkey followed suit and became the 'donmeh' who were crypto-sabbateans who practiced their own dark religion behind closed doors whilst outwardly professing to be muslims. Its possible that the young turks were tied to this cult and that the cult seized control of the country. I think sabbateans are also embedded within the christian church and many catholics attest to a takeover of the vatican (see for example sedevacantalism)


Hi Mac, I've done a little bit of reading into the sabbateans trying to find out how they came about, because it seems plausible to me that a leader like Zevi wouldn't just appear out of nowhere without any outside influences. Although he had a motive of being seen as the messiah, I wonder if he was just a front man and someone else, or perhaps an already existing hidden sect was putting him forward as a public front. 
Zevi became interested in mysticism and Kabbalah as a young man, and during his colourful life Kabbalah appears as a common thread among his influencers, followers and promoters such as Isaac Luria, Nathan of Gaza and Abraham Yachini.  Kabbalah is of course a well known subset of Judaism with published literature, which is variously described as mysticism and occultism. It's not a secret society in itself, but do you think there might have been underground orders hiding within Kabbalah which could have surfaced as things like Sabbateanism, only to disappear back into the shadows at a later date? Or is the Kabbalah connection simply a coincidence?  

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Campion said:

 do you think there might have been underground orders hiding within Kabbalah which could have surfaced as things like Sabbateanism, only to disappear back into the shadows at a later date? Or is the Kabbalah connection simply a coincidence?  


I think so yes. There have been different takes on the kabbalah for example dion fortune complains in her book 'the mystical qabalah' that aleister crowley was playing around with the positions of the spheres on the tree of life to fit his own anal fixations.


You mentioned isaac luria and he created a new form of kabbalah: lurianic kabbalah which the muslim author david livingston says is a supremacist doctrine. Sabbateans subscribe to lurianic kabbalah as does chabad lubavich.


The freemasonic author manley p hall says that kabbalah was revealed to mankind by the angel Raziel. Now some people will say that raziel is a fallen angel which of course would make him evil and therefore the kabbalah an instrument of evil. However others have a different interpretation of religion arguing that the adversaries are there to test mankind but are really just agents of god. Researchers/occultists like mark passio will say that the kabbalah is neutral as is all occult knowledge and what matters is what the practitioner does with it: do they use it for good or for ill?


But for our intents and purposes we can certainly drill into lurianic kabbalah and examine david livingston's claims that it is a supremacist doctrine hellbent on global domination. Also we can explore the existence of dark occultism pre-dating sabbatai zevi and explore whether or not he was himself influenced by existing dark arts.


The conspiracy author Dean henderson speaks about the role of the grand lodge of cairo in turning out key figures in the conspiracy. For example i think he ties in the 'old man of the mountain' who was the leader of the 'assassins'. Henderson speculates that this knowledge of how to create a mind controlled assassin was then passed down through the saudis to the CIA who sought to create 'manchurian candidates'. The author fritz springmeier has written about how the 'illuminati' create mind controlled slaves through trauma based mind control.


The 'illuminati' is imo really just a name for the cult that controls freemasonry made up of people like the rothschilds and rockefellers who i believe to be sabbateans.


President washington of the united states of america wrote a letter to a friend saying he did not believe that illuminated freemasonry, he called 'jacobinism' had yet infiltrated the lodges of the americas. His friend had feared that the freemasons whom had carried out the french revolution might be agitating in the americas. Those jacobins had operated through the grand orient lodge in paris which bares the words 'egalite, fraternite, liberte' on its interior walls. The rothschilds had bankrolled a jesuit trained jew adam weishaupt (i suggest he was also a sabbatean) to set up a bavarian branch of the illuminati.


When lightening struck one of the bavarian illuminati's dispatch riders, killing him, the authorities then found the letters he was carrying which outlined plans to overthrow the monarchies of europe. The elector of hanover (i believe it was from memory) then outlawed the order so its members scattered and percolated into wider freemasonry including the grand orient lodge in paris.


The 'skull and bones' society through which the bush presidents as well as john kerry who is currently speaking at the davos meeting in switzerland of the worlds occult elites is likely an american branch of the illuminati. An america student once had the audacity to publically question kerry about his membership of the skull and bones whilst pointing out that his political rival for the presidency, george bush jnr, was also a member of the skull and bones. The mic was cut off and the student was dragged to the back of the hall and tasered:



Edited by Macnamara
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also further back I get impression that

Babylon also seems to have something to do with origins of Kabbala too?

But then where did it originate  ?

Was it just survival from pre flood days ?

Or was it a kind of shamans language  divination   wheel thing ? 



But  also The mirror image version  of Kabbalists ,


 apparently caused by distortion ,excess lack of connection to lightning flash, consciousness  etc

seems to me  Quiphoth is  what oligarchs are into with their numerologist spells 

Eg 9/11



without going through 1 etc




Edited by Talorgan
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Macnamara said:

The 'illuminati' is imo really just a name for the cult that controls freemasonry made up of people like the rothschilds and rockefellers who i believe to be sabbateans.


Super detailed reply as ever, thanks Mac! Much to digest. I agree that 'Illuminati' is probably a pen name for a loose-knit network of elites rather than a specific organisation. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The extraordinary story of the ‘Pirate Republic’

Celebrating 50 years of independence this year, the Bahamas has come a long way since its days as a lawless land of buccaneers

By Chris Leadbeater, Travel Correspondent 18 January 2023 • 3:00pm

Amble along Navy Lion Road or Woodes Rogers Walk on a typically warm Caribbean morning, and you will see ships. Lots of ships. You will see super-yachts tucked into the sheltered waters of Pointe Marina.

You will surely see cruise ships, too, either wedged into the concrete of Prince George Wharf, or filling up the channel which separates the most populous part of the Bahamas – the capital Nassau, on New Providence island – from the sunny playground of Paradise Island opposite.

There will be passengers, sailors and dockers as well. But it won’t be like the old days. It will be nothing like the old days.

For a country broadly regarded as an unhurried haven for hot-weather holidays (tourism accounts for 70 per cent of its GDP; contrary to popular opinion, off-shore banking makes up only 15 per cent), the Bahamas has a great deal of history.


Some of it is seismic – one of its islands (academic debate still rages as to which) was the first fragment of the Americas spotted by Christopher Columbus, on October 12 1492.

Some of it is dark – the hellscape of slavery and European-borne disease which ensued. Some of it is far brighter - 2023 marks the 50th anniversary of Bahamian independence. And some of it… well, some of it swashes and buckles in a manner that seems scarcely credible 300 years later.


Put plainly, and in modern terminology, if you go back to the start of the 18th century, the Bahamas was a terrorist state. It was a violent, dangerous place where only vicious men and dead-eyed killers could survive. But a potent mix of mythology, Hollywood, Errol Flynn’s smile and Johnny Depp’s eyeliner have worked their magic, so it is simpler to go with a more romantic description of this nation of islands.

From roughly 1706 to 1718, the Bahamas – or, at least, New Providence, and the grimy alleyways of the fledgling Nassau - was the “Republic of Pirates”. Splice the mainsail and unfurl the Jolly Roger – this is a tale that needs retelling. 

This tale started earlier, of course, in the whirlpool of the colonial rush sparked by Columbus’s voyages. Initially claimed by Spain, the Bahamas fell into British clutches in 1648, with the arrival of settlers (the so-called “Eleutheran Adventurers”) from Bermuda.

By 1670, Charles II had formally tied the islands to the new province of Carolina, on the American mainland – an absentee-landlord arrangement which allowed disorder to thrive.

Into this vacuum sailed Henry Avery, an English mariner who docked his ship, the Fancy, in Nassau in 1696, her hold stuffed with plundered gold, silver, ivory and gunpowder. Partly in self-preservation and partly in self-interest, the governor of the Bahamas, Sir Nicholas Trott, had accepted a sizable bribe to sanction the Fancy’s entry. This bought Avery a blind eye turned – and permission to use New Providence as a base. A precedent was set.

Avery was not just a pirate. He might as easily be considered a “privateer”: a sailor with a licence, often government-granted, to make mischief in distant waters by harrying the vessels of his sponsor’s enemies and inflicting financial damage by stealing their cargoes.

These were profitable times. The War of the Spanish Succession engulfed much of Europe between 1701 and 1715, and sent ripples across to the Caribbean, where Spanish, French, Portuguese, British and Dutch ships were frequently at each other’s throats in the Atlantic’s main shipping lanes. Suddenly, the Bahamas – one of the quieter outposts of the “New World” – was in a prime location.

The men who followed Avery were pirates in a “pure” sense; they were beholden to no government and interested solely in their own endeavours. Though even here, there was honour among thieves. On its coalescence in around 1706, the “Republic of Pirates” brought a certain hard order to the lawlessness.

As well as a governor, there was a formal magistrate to enforce the island’s rules, usually on bloody terms. One of the holders of this “office” was one Edward Teach. He is better known today as the fearsome figure Blackbeard, despite the fact that Teach was not one of the ringleaders when the Republic began aggressively expanding its activities. 

Peace in Europe was not good business for the villains of New Providence. The end of the war made the thin veil of legitimacy provided by privateering licences all but redundant, and the Treaty of Utrecht stripped French and Spanish galleons of their enemy status. Not that this mattered hugely to the unscrupulous captains moored in Nassau.


Peace broke out here, too – namely between Henry Jennings and Benjamin Hornigold, two of the port’s biggest hitters and bitterest rivals. Their teaming-up to form the “Flying Gang” was a grim development for legitimate shipping in Caribbean waters.

When news broke that a Spanish flotilla had gone down in a hurricane off the east coast of Florida on July 31 1715 – just five months after hostilities had ceased in Europe – Jennings was one of the first on the scene, ravenous for gold, attacking the salvage vessels attempting to rescue a sunken treasure of astonishing value.

Hornigold would cling vaguely to his privateer tag, refusing to target British ships. Teach, who was part of his crew, had no such principles. If it sailed past him, he would shoot it. By 1718, he had emerged from Hornigold’s shadow and was running riot on the American coast, his guns trained on Virginia and the Carolinas.


In the May of that year, he blockaded Charleston, stopping any ship coming in or out, and syphoning anything of value. His infamy grew, but would eventually be his undoing. Cornered by the British lieutenant Robert Maynard in Ocracoke Inlet, off (what is now) North Carolina, on November 22, he was filleted in a blur of hand-to-hand combat, the deck of the ship he had recklessly boarded slippery with blood.

His corpse would be tossed to the waves, but only after his head had been severed and speared onto the bowsprit of Maynard’s sloop – the starkest of warnings.

The buccaneer party was approaching its end, as Europe’s kings grew tired of the useful thugs whose belligerence had served them so well. It is with good reason that Nassau’s waterfront is now named after Woodes Rogers. While Blackbeard had been pillaging the Carolinas, this former privateer had been appointed as a new governor of the Bahamas, dispatched to the Caribbean by George I with a brief to quash the Republic of Pirates.


Those who haunted its harbour had a straightforward choice: to receive a full “King’s Pardon”, or face the consequences. Some chose wisely. Jennings accepted the amnesty, and retired to Bermuda to run a plantation. Hornigold embraced it, turning gamekeeper to hunt down his former comrades at Rogers’s behest.

There were enough refuseniks to keep him busy, too, but the sun was setting on the pirate era. Charles Vane – one of the most notorious of the Bahamas pirates – was captured off (what is now) Honduras in 1719 and swung from the gallows, at Port Royal on the south coast of Jamaica, on March 29 1721.

Much has changed in the Bahamas since. But if you stroll the streets of Nassau today, you will notice merry echoes of a turbulent period. You have the Pirates of Nassau museum (piratesofnassau.com; entry from £5.50), which recreates the era in gibbets, waxworks and treasure chests. You have Pirate Republic Brewing (piraterepublicbahamas.com), where you can toast any hearties of your choosing with local beer. And you have Blackbeard’s Revenge (blackbeardsrevenge.com), a replica galleon open for dinner- and booze-cruises.

Quite what Captain Teach would make of such matters – accoutrements include limbo dancers and foam machines – is very hard to say. Perhaps, ultimately, it would be safer not to ask.


  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/11/2023 at 11:26 PM, Macnamara said:

The Luciferian Roots of the FBI - The Revealing with Shavon Ayala and Matt Ehret





Ehret has some interesting things to say but one phrase grated on me: the 'anglosphere'.


If the conspiracy were being run by an 'angloshpere' then why would the british establishment:

-jab all of the anglo-saxons in britain with a covid bioweapon?

-flood britain with non anglo-saxon people from all around the world?

-bathe the anglos in britain in wifi and microwaves and endocrine disrupting chemicals that destroy fertility?

-push an anti-white 'woke' agenda onto the british people?


Certainly the neo-marxists love to blame the problems in the world on 'white supremacism' and 'american exceptionalism' thereby placing the blame at the door of anglo-saxon people. But is it anglo-saxon families that run the central banks? Is it an anglo-saxon parasite that sits at the top of illuminated freemasonry? Is sabbateanism an anglo-saxon occult order?


Contrary to his own argument Ehret mentions in the talk, linked to above, that the oligarchic 'parasites' he is speaking about moved to britain during the glorious revolution when william of orange invaded britain. However the problem with this is that the people who moved into britain during the 'glorious revolution' were the dutch jews, largely from amsterdam where they had created a dutch central bank and were running sugar processing plants that formed the backbone of the transatlantic slave trade. Those, i strongly suggest SABBATEAN-jews, created the dutch central bank and the dutch east india company so active in creating the age of COLONIALISM that the woke crowd so love to try and pin on 'the british'.


The jews had been expelled from britain except those that became crypto-jews such as the merranos in spain. Once the dutch jews had been welcomed into britain by william of orange they then set up a central bank and the east india company to which the rothschilds were investors as they were to the de beers diamond company in south africa. Indeed william of orange would not have been able to mount his invasion of britain in 1688 had he not been bankrolled by the dutch jew fransisco suasso:


This Day in Jewish History |

1710: The Banker Who Helped William of Orange Conquer England Dies

Elegantly, Francisco Suasso declined collateral for the loan: ‘If thou art victorious, I know thou wilt return them to me; art thou not victorious, I agree to having lost them’

David B. Green

Apr 22, 2015

On April 22, 1710, Francisco Lopes Suasso, scion of one the wealthiest and most influential banking families of the Dutch Golden Age, died in the Hague, at the approximate age of 53.

Francisco Lopes Suasso – known within the Jewish community of Amsterdam as Abraham Israel Suasso – was born in that city in or around 1657. He was the oldest son of Antonio Lopes Suasso (1614–1685) and Violenta de Pinto. Both parents were descendants of Converso families that left Spain after the Inquisition and eventually made their way to the Netherlands, where they were able to resume living openly as Jews. Antonio had apparently been born in Bordeaux, and Violenta in Antwerp.

Francisco was born into wealth: Antonio was a successful banker, one who was as prized for his political acumen as for his financial skills. Although the family had been driven from Spain, Antonio maintained good relations with King Charles II, loaning him funds in 1672, when he was defending Spain’s possessions in the Netherlands from a French invasion. In return, Charles bestowed the title of Baron d’Avernas le Gras on Antonio in 1676.

Antonio’s bank also provided financial support to the stadtholders, the effective rulers of each of the Dutch provinces under Spanish sovereignty.

Banking an invasion of England

In 1682, Francisco, the son, married Judith Francisco Texeira, whose father was yet another Sephardi-Jewish banker, Manoel Isaac Texeira, of Hamburg. Had their marriage yielded sons, a new banking dynasty combining the holdings of both families would have been created. Sadly, though, Judith died in 1689, having borne no children.

In the meantime, Francisco, upon the death of his father in 1685, inherited half of his estate, which was largely made up of shares of the Dutch East India Company

Like Antonio before him, Francisco was politically astute as well as rich, and it was to him who William of Orange turned in 1688 when he was preparing to invade England, intending to overthrow the king, his father-in-law, the Catholic James II.

Francisco provided the future William III of Britain with a loan of two million guilders, an astronomical sum at the time. But no less impressive is that when William asked him what he demanded in terms of collateral, Francisco responded – at least according to the legend – “If thou art victorious, I know thou wilt return them to me; art thou not victorious, I agree to having lost them.”

The word of William

A portrait of Francisco Lopes Suasso as a young man, c. 1677
A portrait of Francisco Lopes Suasso as a young man, c. 1677Credit: Wikipedia

William was of course victorious, and he did repay his banker. The chest in which he delivered the returned money is still on display at the Willet-Holthuisen Museum in Amsterdam.

Francisco’s assistance to the crown went further, with him taking responsibility for other elements of the invasion, including providing for the transport of Swedish and Pomeranian troops, sent by the king of Sweden to assist William in the operation. This Suasso did with the assistance of his then-father-in-law Manoel Texeira, in Hamburg.

Other Dutch Jews similarly assisted William and hoped for his success, even holding a special service at the Portuguese Synagogue the day after he sailed. They not only expected his conquest to lead to an improvement of conditions for their Jewish brethren in England, but also, according to historian Jonathan Israel, expected it to be beneficial to their own ties with the Sephardi communities of the British colonies in the Caribbean, including Barbados and Jamaica.

In 1694, Francisco Lopes Suasso married Leonora (Rachel) da Costa: She bore him 10 children, including seven sons.

Francisco died on this day in 1710. He was buried in the Etz Haim Cemetery at Ouderkerk aan de Amstel, just outside Amsterdam. His eldest son, Isaac Lopes Suasso, took over from him as head of the family business, and inherited the title of Baron d’Avernas le Gras.


Link to comment
Share on other sites



I think Ehret mentions China's 'one belt one road' scheme but we have to ask how China transformed from an agrarian peasant economy into the technocratic powerhouse it is today. Chiarman Mao was educated in an offshoot of the american yale university set up by members of yale's secretive 'skull and bones' society. Members of illuminati bloodline families are recruited into the skull and bones and from there are then recruited into the CIA or into prominant positions in business or politics.


Those illuminati families poured money and their corporations into china and provided the technology for china to create its facial recognition, social credit scores and concentration camps (re-education centres). Here is the ex-head of the Rothschild family speaking about some of his families investments in china:

China: The World’s First Technate – Part 1

Posted By: Iain Davis November 23, 2022

Constructing The Technate In China

Mao Zedong’s “Great Leap Forward” saw 40 million people brutalised and starved to death in just three horrific years (1959–1961). Apologists claim this was all a terrible mistake. But it was nothing of the kind.

In the certain knowledge that food supplies were running out, in 1958 Mao insisted that “to distribute resources evenly will only ruin the Great Leap Forward.” Later the same year, he asserted:

When there is not enough to eat, people starve to death. It is better to let half the people die so that others can eat their fill.

In his zeal to create a communist utopia, Mao presided over a system that seized food from starving millions and exported it to fund his political reforms and support his determination to rapidly industrialise the economy. It wasn’t an error or an unfortunate oversight. While many were so terrified that they submitted fake reports of surpluses that didn’t exist, it is clear that the leadership of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) knew exactly what the human costs were. They just didn’t care.



Mao and Rockefeller’s view of the Great Leap Forward


Nor did David Rockefeller, as evidenced by his 1973 op-ed for The New York Times. He and his Chase Group banking empire delegation had visited Maoist China. In his account of the trip, Rockefeller dismissed the mass murder of millions as “whatever.” It was only the product of genocide that Rockefeller was interested in:

One is impressed immediately by the sense of national harmony. [. . .] There is a very real and pervasive dedication to Chairman Mao and Maoist principles. Whatever the price of the Chinese revolution it has obviously succeeded, not only in producing a more efficient administration, but also in fostering. [. . .] a community of purpose.

The Trilateralist Rockefeller could see the opportunity the Chinese dictatorship presented the parasite class. In full agreement with Brzezinski, he wrote:

Too often the true significance and potential of our new relationship with China has been obscured. [. . .] In fact, of course, we are experiencing a much more fundamental phenomenon. [. . .] The Chinese, for their part, are faced with altering a primarily inward focus. [. . .] We, for our part, are faced with the realization that we have largely ignored a country with one-fourth of the world’s population.

The “we” Rockefeller referred to was not us. He meant the G3P and his fellow “stakeholder capitalists” and Trilateralists.

The totalitarian order he saw in China impressed him, as he had hoped it would. Not that Rockefeller was the only Trilateralist to see the technocratic possibilities in China. So did others, naturally, for the sheer scale of the market was an enticing prospect, and the promise of the “Technetronic Age” raised the real potential to build the world’s first Technate.

Completely discounting the appalling loss of human life, Rockefeller wrote:

The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao’s leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history. How extensively China opens up and how the world reacts to the social innovation [. . .] is certain to have a profound impact upon the future of many nations.



A look at the Great Leap Forward


The G3P’s task was to crack open the Chinese market while supporting the country’s ongoing totalitarian rule. China would need help with its economic development and technical support to build the technological infrastructure necessary for technocracy to work. This process had already begun, but with Rockefeller, Brzezinski, Kissinger and other Trilateralists committed to the cause, the target of constructing a Technate was firmly in the Trilateral Commission’s sights.

The Trilateralists set about assisting China to develop both economically and technologically, while remaining careful to avoid applying too much pressure for political reform. Totalitarianism was a system they supported and wanted to exploit. In their 1978 Paper No. 15 on East-West Relations, they suggested:

To grant China favourable conditions in economic relations is definitely in the political interest of the West. [. . .] [T]here seems to exist sufficient ways for aiding China in acceptable forms with advanced civilian technology.

In the same paper, the Trilateralists announced that they weren’t entirely averse to helping China modernise its military capability, though they stressed this should be only for defensive purposes.

They accepted that a modern, militarised China might turn to expansionism and seek to regain territory it historically claimed as its own—in particular, Taiwan. They judged this was a reasonable risk to take.

They were playing the great game. Human lives—except their own and the lives of their families, of course—were of no concern.

In Part 2 we will look at how they set about constructing the world’s first Technate in China.



Edited by Macnamara
Link to comment
Share on other sites



'Choseness' is a term used by Gilad Atzmon to describe jewish identity however what clouds this whole issue is the existence of the heretical sect of sabbateans. I saw a clip recently of an Israeli reporter interviewing a columbian singer at the football world cup. The israeli asked the singer if they felt there was any moral quandry with performing in a country with a poor human rights record! This was after it had been reported elsewhere that the IDF had recently shot dead 9 palestineans. So we have to ask if the chutzpah of the israeli reporter was simply a lack of self-awareness or if it is something more sinister?


This sense of 'choseness' that gilad atzmon speaks about is essentially a sense of ENTITLEMENT that comes from believing that you are better than everyone else. If for example you believe that only your in-group have souls and that the rest of humanity do not and are therefore comparable to animals ('goyim' = cattle) then that can create a sense of entitlement whereby you believe that you can mistreat those people outside your in-group because ultimately their purpose is to serve you as the chosen group.


My own view is that all humans are God's children and therefore ALL have inalienable rights. This is why i wouldn't support the persecution of any group of that wider human species. Important to get that caveat in there in these times of polarisation i think!


Another group that exhibit that sense of aloofness is occultists who go through a process of 'initiation' whereby they believe that those who have not undergone the same process are 'profane' which is an inherently religious term. I would argue that the various initiatory orders that have proliferated in europe are being drive by the sabbatean network as part of their wider war on society to create interconnected networks of 'change agents'. So i would argue that the arrogance of some occultists is really an echo of the sabbatean supremacist mindset that is being passed down the control pyramid to the layers of quislings and useful idiots that then act as the sabbatean's shabbos-goy.


So how could such a sense of entitlement manifest in our world? Could it make some feel entitled to:



Former Spy Details Israel’s Main Motive Behind Epstein’s Sexual Blackmail Operation


MUST WATCH: Rebel News Reporters Confront Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla on His Unsafe and Ineffective mRNA Shots




‘Place the Material in the Wells’: Docs Point to Israeli Army’s 1948 Biological Warfare

For decades, rumors and testimonies swirled about Jewish troops sent to poison wells in Arab villages. Now, researchers have located official documentation of the ‘Cast Thy Bread’ operation




Neocons bent on starting another disaster in Ukraine

US foreign policy is evidently held hostage by a venal, avaricious and, above all, reckless claque of elites

Sam Bankman-Fried ordered $65B ‘secret backdoor line of credit,’ lawyer says

Dietderich said the “backdoor was a secret way for Alameda to borrow from customers on the exchange without permission.”




Bob Dylan apologizes for using autopen to sign $600 copies of his book




Meet 17 BlackRock power players carrying out CEO Larry Fink's vision to turbocharge the firm's $222 billion alternative-investments business




Larry David - on Weinstein and Jews


Edited by Macnamara
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Strange Military Deaths part 23: The spy in the bag

The spy in the bag WAS murdered, claims author of new book: Expert investigator tried to lock himself inside a holdall more than 300 times but couldn’t do it – and says he is sure Gareth Williams was killed then smeared as a sexual deviant

  • Gareth Williams was found dead in a padlocked holdall in a bath in his flat in 2010
  • Theories about his death range from a sex game gone wrong to a Russian hit 
  • Now an expert investigator says in a new book that he is sure the spy was killed 
  • Click here to read an exclusive extract from Peter Faulding's book on The Mail+

By Chris Dean For Mailonline

Published: 10:33 GMT, 20 January 2023 | Updated: 10:44 GMT, 20 January 2023

IT’S the real-life espionage mystery that spawned a string of theories from a sex game gone wrong to a Russian assassination – just how did ‘spy in the bag’ Gareth Williams meet his untimely end?

Now a new book by an investigator who’s an expert in unusual deaths claims to have the answer.

In an exclusive extract on The Mail+ today, Peter Faulding says he is convinced that the agent was murdered.

His book, What Lies Beneath: My Life as a Forensic Search and Rescue Expert, delves into the case that became a worldwide sensation in 2010. In an attempt to get to the bottom of the mystery, he tried more than 300 times to lock himself inside a holdall in the way Mr Williams would have to have done – and failed on every occasion. ‘Not even Houdini would have been able to pull it off,’ he writes.

Mr Williams worked for GCHQ and was on secondment to MI6 when he was found dead in a holdall with the zips padlocked together in the bath of his London flat. There were no fingerprints or signs of struggle, and the front door had been locked from the outside.

Women’s clothing was found in the flat, and over the following months further evidence suggested a kinky sex game had gone tragically wrong. But Mr Faulding writes: ‘To be honest, it seemed implausible to me. I know people are into auto-asphyxiation and bondage, but the technicalities of what was being suggested seemed impossible.

‘I presented my thoughts to the investigation team. In my opinion Gareth was already dead when he was put in the bag.’

He adds: ‘It looked to me like someone was trying to smear him.’

An inquest found that Mr Williams’s death was ‘unnatural and likely to have been criminally mediated’. But a subsequent Metropolitan Police re-investigation concluded that Williams's death was ‘probably an accident’.

Mr Faulding is convinced that Mr Williams was viciously smeared as a sexual deviant – and that the truth about his death is very different. Now read why in an exclusive extract from his book, only on The Mail+.

What Lies Beneath: My Life As A Forensic Search And Rescue Expert by Peter Faulding will be published by Macmillan on February 2, £18.99. Copyright 2023 Peter Faulding. To order a copy go to www.mailshop.co.uk or call 020 3176 2937. 



Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...