Jump to content

Cap'n Mac's Pirate Republic!


Macnamara

Recommended Posts

Bill Gates is just a mask on the face of Rockefeller (part of the rothschild cabal)

Rockefellers Establish a Taskforce

The 1980s marked a turning point for the vaccination regime spearheaded by the Taskforce on Childhood Survival and Development.  The Taskforce was established to coordinate the immunisation activities of major international agencies.  It was a partnership between several United Nations (“UN”) agencies and the Rockefeller Foundation.

In 1983, the vaccine compensation act was introduced in Congress.  And in 1986, the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (“NCVIA”) became law.  In short, this law made the liability for vaccine injury the responsibility of the US government while the profits for vaccines went to Big Pharma. As a result, and not surprisingly, in the following decades, there was a massive increase in the number of recommended vaccines.  Under the NCVIA, the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (“NVICP”) was created.

Following the enactment of the NCVIA, the Children’s Vaccine Initiative was founded in 1990.  The sponsors included the World Bank, Rockefeller Foundation, WHO, United Nations Children’s Fund (“UNICEF”) and United Nations Development Program (“UNDP”).  It had several goals, three of which were: mobilisation of substantially greater resources for vaccine introduction, especially in developing countries; unprecedented levels of collaboration; and, raising awareness of the high value of vaccines.

image-304.png?resize=639%2C338&ssl=1 Shadow Government Architecture: The Vaccine Perspective, NIA Research, 22 August 2022 (timestamp 28:57)

The Vaccine Regime Goes Global

In 2000, the Global Alliance for Vaccine and Immunisation (“GAVI”), led by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, was formed. GAVI’s purpose is to facilitate vaccination in developing countries by working with WHO, UNICEF, the World Bank, the vaccine industry, research and technical agencies, the Gates Foundation and other private philanthropists.  The other private philanthropists GAVI works with are as highlighted in the image below.

In 2003, the Gates Foundation developed a report showing the need to create public-private alliances to push the vaccination agenda forward.  The report was titled ‘Global Health Partnerships: Assessing Country Consequences’.  It stated that “some of the key factors used to measure success included overall vaccination rate of populations.”  In other words, the push for private organisations to benefit globally through public policy vaccination had begun to be documented.

In 2005, there was another push by the vaccine regime. WHO published the ‘Global Immunisation Vision and Strategy’ in alliance with the Rockefeller Foundation, Gates Foundation, UNICEF; CDC, GAVI, USAID and the World Bank.  One of the visions was that immunisation was seen as “a major element of efforts to attain the Millennium Development Goals.”

People tend to think that the organisations mentioned above are independent and stand on their own.  But all these organisations are part of a larger infrastructure – WHO, World Bank, and IMF are specialised agencies of the UN and UNICEF is a program and fund of the UN. A lot of the organisations mentioned in Nations in Action’s presentation are pieces of the overall UN infrastructure (see image below).

image-307.png?resize=639%2C358&ssl=1 Shadow Government Architecture: The Vaccine Perspective, NIA Research, 22 August 2022 (timestamp 33:37)

The Decade of Vaccines

In 2010, the Gates Foundation established a roadmap to make the years from 2010 to 2020 the “decade of vaccines.”  Shortly afterwards, on 1 May 2010, the Rockefeller Foundation published ‘Scenarios on Technology and International Development’, within which is a scenario titled ‘Lock Step’. The Lock Step scenario stated:

“In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems – from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crisis and rising poverty – leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power.”

read full article here:

Shocking Investigation discovers a World-Wide Shadow Government has infiltrated “Elected” Governments & Public Health Institutions & built a Global Vaccine Regime

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/15/2022 at 9:48 AM, Macnamara said:

THE GREAT REPLACEMENT clearly NOT just a 'right wing conspiracy theory':

Migration to UK rises to record 504,000 with Ukraine and Hong Kong schemes

Jump in number of international students a factor in figure that is at least 400,000 higher than home secretary is aiming for

Thu 24 Nov 2022 16.59 GMT
Net migration to the UK has reached a record level of 504,000 after the arrival of Ukrainians and Hongkongers under government schemes and a jump in the number of international students.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/nov/24/uk-net-migration-figures-record-ons
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/23/2022 at 5:53 PM, Macnamara said:

Jewish crypto criminal...(madoff was jewish too)....the question is whether this all ties into jewish, pedos jeffrey epstein and ghisalaine maxwell's blackmail operation and the jewish 'mega group' of billionaires? Certainly it ties into the jewish leader of ukraine, zelensky who came to power after a coup in ukraine in 2014 that was orchestrated by jewish neocons victoria nuland and kagan

Fall of Sam Bankman-Fried, Jewish cryptocurrency CEO, brings echoes of Bernie Madoff

 

it's like a sabbatean bar mitzvah: fried, zuckerburg, yellen, zelensky, larry fink (CEO of blackrock)

 

....all they need now is a rothschild compere except they don't like to be out in the spotlight....they prefer to have a front man act for them like bill gates or klaus schwab or george soros or rishi sunak etc...

Do they REALLY want to share a stage with 'crypto conman'? Zelensky and Zuckerberg are set appear alongside disgraced FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried at NYT DealBook summit - in his first public appearance since company's sensational collapse

  • FTX founder's appearance was in doubt following demise of his company and he now faces a criminal probe over the collapse, which has cost investors billions
  • Other speakers include Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, who said crypto can be 'dangerous', and the CEO of BlackRock, which invested millions in FTX
  • Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Hollywood star Ben Affleck are also part of the all-star lineup
  • Bankman-Fried is arguably the headline speaker due to the ongoing FTX crisis - but he'll likely join by video link because he faces arrest if he travels to the US
  • Andrew Ross Sorking, the New York Times columnist overseeing the event, has said 'nothing is off limits' during the interview with Bankman-Fried
  • Bankman-Fried is also accused by business chiefs who are overseeing the FTX bankruptcy of continuing 'to make erratic and misleading public statements' 
  • Confirmation he will appear at DealBook Summit triggered a furious backlash. One critic said: 'This is only acceptable if you're aiding law enforcement'

By Lewis Pennock For Dailymail.Com

Published: 16:33 GMT, 24 November 2022 | Updated: 17:58 GMT, 24 November 2022

Disgraced FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried will still appear at a New York Times book event alongside world leaders and business magnates despite looming criminal investigations into the multi-billion dollar collapse of his company.

Bankman-Fried, 30, confirmed he'll speak at the DealBook Summit, which also boasts speakers including Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, former Vice President Mike Pence and Volydymr Zelensky, the president of war-torn Ukraine.

The chairman and CEO of BlackRock, the investment behemoth which pumped cash into FTX, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and Hollywood star Ben Affleck are also in the lineup.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11466131/Zelensky-Zuckerberg-set-appear-alongside-disgraced-FTX-founder-Sam-Bankman-Fried.html

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/29/2022 at 7:03 PM, Macnamara said:

At what point do we conclude that the people running this country are pursuing a genocidal policy towards the native british people?

 

I used to think that British politics is basically run for the benefit of big business and banking, who control the money and jobs of the ordinary people. The right and left both being under the thumbs of globalist business with its need for a plentiful, compliant and materialistic workforce. Both main parties have wings which speak for traditional communities of either white working-class (old Labour) or little England entrepreneurs (Conservative right) who suck in lots of voters but are never allowed to be in charge. The voting system means that smaller parties are kept down so we become cynical and demoralised about politics changing anything, and give up.  

 

While there's still some truth in that analysis, it doesn't go far enough to explain the issues you've listed, and others like the climate emergency hoax.  I can see there's other agendas and levels of control above business interests in the global pyramid, to explain why we're being moved towards either replacement or enslavement. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/30/2022 at 11:18 PM, Campion said:

 

I used to think that British politics is basically run for the benefit of big business and banking, who control the money and jobs of the ordinary people. The right and left both being under the thumbs of globalist business with its need for a plentiful, compliant and materialistic workforce. Both main parties have wings which speak for traditional communities of either white working-class (old Labour) or little England entrepreneurs (Conservative right) who suck in lots of voters but are never allowed to be in charge. The voting system means that smaller parties are kept down so we become cynical and demoralised about politics changing anything, and give up.  

 

While there's still some truth in that analysis, it doesn't go far enough to explain the issues you've listed, and others like the climate emergency hoax.  I can see there's other agendas and levels of control above business interests in the global pyramid, to explain why we're being moved towards either replacement or enslavement. 

Let's go into the semantics of said words..Politics and Government. Government is comprised of two vowels ,Govern, meaning to control, or conduct the actions of the Populous, Ment is Latin meaning Mind., Politics can be broke into 2 factions Poli can be seen as Poly- Greek meaning many. And Tics meaning blood sucking leaches. Trust these twats at your peril!

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The green agenda is not the path to a brighter future. It is a con trick by the elites to hide their push for neo-fuedalism behind a faux-moral argument around the environment of which they have been the main polluters through their trans-national corporations

How They Plan to Take Your House: The Agenda 2030 Wealth Transfer

 

  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Strange military deaths part 22

'Kind and compassionate' soldier, 18, dies at North Yorkshire army base after 'non-operational incident'

  • Private Joshua Kennington of the Royal Logistic Corps died on November 24 
  • Family described him as 'much loved' someone who always 'had time for others'
  • Ministry of Defence said an investigation into his death is currently ongoing

By Olivia Jones For Mailonline

Published: 19:50 GMT, 6 December 2022 | Updated: 19:50 GMT, 6 December 2022

A young soldier has died aged just 18 at an army base following a 'non-operational incident.'

The Ministry of Defence have confirmed the death of Private Joshua Kennington of the Royal Logistic Corps who died on November 24 this year.

Private Kennington died following a 'non-operational incident' at Catterick Garrison in Richmond, North Yorkshire, which is the largest British Army garrison in the world.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11509187/Kind-compassionate-soldier-18-dies-North-Yorkshire-army-base.html

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Captain's log

 

It seems at times as if the entire world has gone mad. Certainly many people are now detached from reality and simply latch onto whatever the latest fear porn is that the corporate media or state sanctioned media put out. At the moment this is the strep A story which some are linking to the fluenz tetra nose spray 'vaccines' that are given to primary school kids. Streptococcal infection is apparently a side effect of that medical intervention and it makes sense that something jetted up the nose can then affect the throat as the two are connected.

 

There has also been a storm in a tea cup over some royal courtier offending a lady, who i heard someone say was dressed in traditional african clothing, by asking her where she was from. This whole fuss now about asking people where they are from is really to do with the elites vision of making everyone a standardised global citizen. This was the purpose of the UN migration charter which was about doing away with certain terms like 'illegal immigrant' or 'alien' so that people would be able to move anywhere in world that they want and certainly since theresa may snuck off to marrakech to sign that treaty, with no mention by the corporate media, britain has been inundated with migrants. They want it to be immaterial where a person comes from because they want to breakdown and destroy any sense of regional identity. The singer-songwriter Morrissey said publically recently that 'diversity' really means making everyone the same which is absolutely true. They are trying to mix and mash everyone together and to standardise all thought, speech and action which is of course the exact opposite of diversity. I've been asked in my own country where i'm from many times because britain has huge regional diversity. I met a guy who worked in radio once who could pinpoint where a person was from in the country after speaking to them briefly, through their accent.

 

This breakdown of identity is largely done by encouraging young people to deconstruct their own culture but the problem with this is that if you turn up the spotlight on anything you can find faults and if you aren't taking a balanced view you won't balance the bad against the good. Its very easy to criticise the actions of our ancestors without ever having walked in their shoes. For example in the past some people would hunt whales for their oil. That oil was used to light lamps in the pre-industrial era. In those days whales were abundant in the seas and people didn't have the benefit of many modern luxuries and technologies that light our homes and keep them warm. Much of history upto the modern era has simply been a struggle to survive so these things need to be looked at in a nuanced way. I strongly believe that APPRECIATION is a key aspect of happiness and you can only appreciate our ancestors and the past when you see that they got us here through great feats of fortitude and ingenuity. These levels of empathy often only come with age as a person undergoes their own life struggles and gains insights into the struggles and efforts of others. So when the young are targetted with 'critical theory' to make them deconstruct their own past and culture they often lack the deeper level of empathy and insight required to see things in a more nuanced way and this can lead to very black and white thinking. This makes them very impressionable and easy to mislead.

 

Critical theory was an approach to education where students were encouraged to relentlessly find fault in their own country and culture but without ever being asked to discuss any ways in which things could be improved. It was injected into the western education system by jewish marxists from the 'frankfurt school' which had left germany due to the rise of nazism and had been found tenures in US universities through the influence of patrons like the rockefellers who were a sabbatean-jewish family from frankfurt, germany where the rothschilds had been 'court jews' to the royalty of Europe.

 

What happens when you get young people to do this is that it breeds self-loathing in the general populace and people who have no self-respect or self-love (not narcissistic self-love but healthy levels of self-respect) don't stand up for themselves and become doormats who can be trampled on by the state and by woke, neo-marxist, brownshirt, collectivist thugs. If you hate yourself you won't strive like our ancestors did to survive and overcome adversity. If you don't strive you won't reproduce.

Edited by Macnamara
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Captain's log part 2

 

There has been some talk about the couple in new zealand who didn't want their sick baby to receive a blood donation from a vaxxed donor; the state has now taken that child off their parents and will, no doubt give the child vaxxed blood. I suppose that when people are trying to uphold a BIG LIE they cannot allow any chink to open up in that and if the state agreed to the parents wishes and used unvaxxed blood for their baby then that would serve as almost an admission that there is a difference between vaxxed and unvaxxed blood and they can't allow that.

 

You can come up against the same level of intransigence when you deal with a nurse or doctor whose entire working life is INVESTED in the current medical paradigm. They can't even entertain the idea that the jabs they have given out to billions of people might be causing harm because to doubt something that is so fundamental to their entire worldview would shake them to their foundations. If they are presented with evidence that challenges their world view their ego defence mechanisms will kick in and they will fall back on a new line of defence which will be a new rationalisation of what they are doing for example ''well yes no medical treatment is going to be entirely safe but on balance this is worth doing''. However they will never really dig into the data that would show whether in fact the cost to benefit ratio of a medical intervention is in fact tipped in favour of the intervention....they just ASSUME that as the whole medical machine is in support of it, it MUST be ok much like people thought of thalidomide and thimerosol and asbestos and mercury fillings and cigarettes and roundup and so on...

 

Meanwhile to sell the BIG LIE to the public the conspirators will always sell it as being required to rescue the public FROM some sort of threat:

-The state needs to inject everyone including babies and small children in order to save them from a virus that is so deadly that you need a test to tell you that you've got it.

-The state needs to make everything digital and electric to save you from the climate changing

-The state needs to censor people online to save them from having their minds corrupted by those evil 'conspiracy theorists'

-The state needs to remove all of your rights and freedoms to save you from the islamic terrorists.

BUT WHO IS GOING TO SAVE US FROM THE STATE?

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Macnamara said:

This breakdown of identity is largely done by encouraging young people to deconstruct their own culture but the problem with this is that if you turn up the spotlight on anything you can find faults and if you aren't taking a balanced view you won't balance the bad against the good.

 

Agreed, and it's probably too late to turn back the clock to return to our earlier state. However, having learned a twisted version of the deconstruction skill, perhaps one answer is to actually improve on the process and teach our young people to start critically examining the system which brought them to this point. To think for themselves in a healthy way.  However as the mainstream establishments are under the control of the fifth columnists this requires a great deal of work. 

 

5 hours ago, Macnamara said:

BUT WHO IS GOING TO SAVE US FROM THE STATE?

 

The global superstate of course, which wants to convince us how nasty all these individual national states are. 😮 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/8/2022 at 7:09 AM, Macnamara said:

Captain's log

 

It seems at times as if the entire world has gone mad. Certainly many people are now detached from reality and simply latch onto whatever the latest fear porn is that the corporate media or state sanctioned media put out. At the moment this is the strep A story which some are linking to the fluenz tetra nose spray 'vaccines' that are given to primary school kids. Streptococcal infection is apparently a side effect of that medical intervention and it makes sense that something jetted up the nose can then affect the throat as the two are connected.

 

There has also been a storm in a tea cup over some royal courtier offending a lady, who i heard someone say was dressed in traditional african clothing, by asking her where she was from. This whole fuss now about asking people where they are from is really to do with the elites vision of making everyone a standardised global citizen. This was the purpose of the UN migration charter which was about doing away with certain terms like 'illegal immigrant' or 'alien' so that people would be able to move anywhere in world that they want and certainly since theresa may snuck off to marrakech to sign that treaty, with no mention by the corporate media, britain has been inundated with migrants. They want it to be immaterial where a person comes from because they want to breakdown and destroy any sense of regional identity. The singer-songwriter Morrissey said publically recently that 'diversity' really means making everyone the same which is absolutely true. They are trying to mix and mash everyone together and to standardise all thought, speech and action which is of course the exact opposite of diversity. I've been asked in my own country where i'm from many times because britain has huge regional diversity. I met a guy who worked in radio once who could pinpoint where a person was from in the country after speaking to them briefly, through their accent.

 

This breakdown of identity is largely done by encouraging young people to deconstruct their own culture but the problem with this is that if you turn up the spotlight on anything you can find faults and if you aren't taking a balanced view you won't balance the bad against the good. Its very easy to criticise the actions of our ancestors without ever having walked in their shoes. For example in the past some people would hunt whales for their oil. That oil was used to light lamps in the pre-industrial era. In those days whales were abundant in the seas and people didn't have the benefit of many modern luxuries and technologies that light our homes and keep them warm. Much of history upto the modern era has simply been a struggle to survive so these things need to be looked at in a nuanced way. I strongly believe that APPRECIATION is a key aspect of happiness and you can only appreciate our ancestors and the past when you see that they got us here through great feats of fortitude and ingenuity. These levels of empathy often only come with age as a person undergoes their own life struggles and gains insights into the struggles and efforts of others. So when the young are targetted with 'critical theory' to make them deconstruct their own past and culture they often lack the deeper level of empathy and insight required to see things in a more nuanced way and this can lead to very black and white thinking. This makes them very impressionable and easy to mislead.

 

Critical theory was an approach to education where students were encouraged to relentlessly find fault in their own country and culture but without ever being asked to discuss any ways in which things could be improved. It was injected into the western education system by jewish marxists from the 'frankfurt school' which had left germany due to the rise of nazism and had been found tenures in US universities through the influence of patrons like the rockefellers who were a sabbatean-jewish family from frankfurt, germany where the rothschilds had been 'court jews' to the royalty of Europe.

 

What happens when you get young people to do this is that it breeds self-loathing in the general populace and people who have no self-respect or self-love (not narcissistic self-love but healthy levels of self-respect) don't stand up for themselves and become doormats who can be trampled on by the state and by woke, neo-marxist, brownshirt, collectivist thugs. If you hate yourself you won't strive like our ancestors did to survive and overcome adversity. If you don't strive you won't reproduce.

 

The Marxification of Education

 

Edited by Macnamara
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Israeli-Based 3D-Printed Lab-Grown Meat Company is Building World’s Largest Facility in North Carolina

Sunday, 11 December 2022

An Israeli company that specializes in 3D-printed lab-grown meat with non-GMO animal cells is currently building the world’s largest commercial-scale production facility in North Carolina.

Believer Meat, formerly known as Future Meat Technologies, is building its facility with an initial planned investment of $123.35 million located in Wilson County, North Carolina, which covers a site of 200,000-square-foot.

“BELIEVER Meats, a leading pioneer of the cultivated meat industry, officially broke ground today on its first U.S. commercial facility in Wilson, North Carolina,” the company said in a statement Wednesday.

“Once operational, the 200,000-square-foot facility will be the largest cultivated meat production center in the world with the capacity to produce at least 10,000 metric tons of cultivated meat, without the need to slaughter a single animal. This is a watershed moment for the cultivated meat industry that will allow BELIEVER Meats to meet growing demand for decades to come.” 

http://www.domigood.com/2022/12/israeli-based-3d-printed-lab-grown-meat.html

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Oppressed

Nature: Unvaccinated Were Victims of Discrimination During the Pandemic

Nature, the world’s pre-eminent scientific journal, has published a peer-reviewed study by Alexander Bor, Frederik Jørgensen and Michael Bang documenting just how widespread discriminatory attitudes were towards the unvaccinated during the pandemic. This won’t be a revelation to Daily Sceptic readers, but it’s good to have it confirmed by the house journal of those for whom ‘following the Science’ is a moral commandment.

Here’s the abstract:

During the COVID-19 pandemic sizeable groups of unvaccinated minorities persist even in countries with high vaccine access. Consequently, vaccination became a controversial subject of debate and even protest. Here, we assess whether people express discriminatory attitudes in the form of negative affect, stereotypes and exclusionary attitudes in family and political settings across groups defined by COVID-19 vaccination status. We quantify discriminatory attitudes between vaccinated and unvaccinated citizens in 21 countries, covering a diverse set of cultures across the world. Across three conjoint experimental studies (N=15,233), we demonstrate that vaccinated people express discriminatory attitudes towards the unvaccinated, as high as the discriminatory attitudes suffered by common targets like immigrant and minority populations. In contrast, there is an absence of evidence that unvaccinated individuals display discriminatory attitudes towards vaccinated people, except for the presence of negative affect in Germany and United States. We find evidence in support of discriminatory attitudes against the unvaccinated in all countries except Hungary and Romania and find that discriminatory attitudes are more strongly expressed in cultures with stronger cooperative norms. Prior research on the psychology of cooperation has shown that individuals react negatively against perceived free-riders including in the domain of vaccinations. Consistent with this, the present findings suggest that contributors to the public good of epidemic control (i.e., the vaccinated) react with discriminatory attitudes against perceived free-riders (i.e., the unvaccinated). Elites and the vaccinated general public appealed to moral obligations to increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake but the present findings suggest that discriminatory attitudes including support for the removal of fundamental rights simultaneously emerged.

You can download a PDF of the study here.

https://dailysceptic.org/2022/12/10/nature-unvaccinated-were-victims-of-discrimination-during-the-pandemic/

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

‘We’re Led by Idiots’ – Farage Slams Green Agenda as Reserve Coal Power Stations Fired Up

http://www.tathasta.com/2022/12/were-led-by-idiots-farage-slams-green.html

 

No we're not led by idiots Nigel, they are achieving exactly what they are setting out to achieve: the destruction of this nation. When are you going to cease this 'its all just negligence' buffoonery and call it what it is: A CONSPIRACY?

Great Reset: UK Prepares to Introduce a ‘Digital Pound’ Central Bank Digital Currency

Kurt Zindulka

11 Dec 2022

The de facto head of His Majesty’s Treasury announced this week that the Bank of England has begun consultations on implementing a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) that could usher in the globalist vision of a cashless society in which all transactions are traceable by the government.

Chancellor of the Exchequer Jeremy Hunt revealed that, as a part of his ‘Edinburgh Reforms’ of Britain’s financial services, the Bank of England will begin consultations on the design of a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) which would act as a digital version of the pound sterling.

Hunt, an anti-Brexit, pro-China figure resurrected from the David Cameron era, said in a written statement to Parliament that the government will begin “bringing forward a consultation in the coming weeks to explore the case for a central bank digital currency – a sovereign digital pound – and consult on a potential design.”

“The Bank of England will also release a Technology Working Paper setting out cutting-edge technology considerations informing the potential build of a digital pound,” he added.

In contrast to Bitcoin, which functions on a decentralised basis in which no single person can control its functions, ownership, or value, a CBDC would be similar to traditional fiat currency issued by a central bank, such as the Bank of England, and therefore could suffer from the same inflation issues if the central bank decided to issue more of it — like printing cash.

Should a CBDC replace hard currency altogether, the government would be able to track every purchase or transaction made by the public.

The Bank of England has also admitted that a digital pound could be “programmable“, meaning that the government could potentially add mechanisms to prevent people from spending their own money on things the state disapproves.

This has led to concerns that Western governments could implement a system akin to the social credit score in Communist China, which has already been used to blacklist millions of citizens from travelling, including those who dissented against the authoritarian rule of Chairman Xi Jinping.

Cashless Society: Britain’s Royal Mint Ordered to Start Producing NFTshttps://t.co/7boh6UVgQf

— Breitbart London (@BreitbartLondon) April 6, 2022

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, who was essentially endorsed by Chinese state media in the contest to replace Boris Johnson as PM — which he lost — and who married into the multi-billion Infosys tech dynasty in India, has been at the forefront of pushing for the introduction of a CBDC in Britain.

Central Bank Digital Currencies are also heavily supported by the globalist Davos-based World Economic Forum (WEF), which listed it among the technologies that will “change the world by 2027“.

The WEF said that Central Bank Digital Currencies will “revolutionise the financial systemthrough “increasing financial inclusion and improving the lives of billions of people globally by providing access to cheap and affordable financial services.”

“For banks and issuers, they’ll be able to integrate their existing infrastructure and be able to provide a broad spectrum of CBDC-linked payment-related services and exercise cross-chain interoperability protocols for universal payment access to digital national currencies, stablecoins, NFTs, the Metaverse and much more,” the WEF suggested.

Alongside the nominally Conservative government in the United Kingdom, the Biden administration in the United States and the European Union are also both working towards the implementation of digital versions of their currencies.

EU Central Banker Pushes Bitcoin Ban Under Guise of Climate Change https://t.co/BPi3iVbclv

— Breitbart London (@BreitbartLondon) December 10, 2022

https://12ft.io/proxy?q=https%3A//www.breitbart.com/europe/2022/12/11/uk-prepares-to-introduce-a-digital-pound-central-bank-digital-currency/

 

cs5a29sqqt4a1.jpg?width=680&auto=webp&s=

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/12/2022 at 7:55 PM, Macnamara said:

The Oppressed

Nature: Unvaccinated Were Victims of Discrimination During the Pandemic

 

The Shameful Crushing of Dissenters

You may have questioned the veracity of government pandemic interventions: it might have been masks, the rule of six or the 10 o’clock curfew; it may have been the modelling that finally tipped you over the edge. But without dissenters to the Government’s pandemic policies, it would have taken much longer to exit lockdowns, and if China is anything to go by, we might not yet have re-emerged. 

With the publication of Matt Hancock’s diaries, we’re discovering the true extent of the Government’s suppression strategies and those behind them.

In July 2020, we wrote in the Spectator about whether face masks help. The article was motivated by the rollout of mask mandates at the end of the month. We expressed the uncertainty in the evidence-base and the setting of policy based on “opinions, radical views and political influence”.

This article went largely unchallenged. However, this all changed in November 2020, when we further published on the only European community trial of masks and the update of our Cochrane Review that found no significant effect for facemask wearers.

The Danish trial done during the pandemic joined 16 other trials carried out over the years at times of variable respiratory agents’ circulation in showing no significant effect, either if compared to not wearing masks at all or wearing other types of face coverings, irrespective of setting.

Despite hundreds of positive comments, the article got censored by Facebook. It led to a vitriolic campaign of denigration with sundry personal attacks, personal losses of posts, complaint procedures to our institutions, smear campaigns and the setting up of websites backed by ministers to attack dissenting academics and journalists.

image-26-1024x715.png

But we now learn from Isabel Oakeshott’s piece that the attacks were partly orchestrated by Hancock, who harnessed the full power of the state to silence ‘dissenters’. 

As far as Hancock was concerned, anyone who fundamentally disagreed with his approach was mad and dangerous and needed to be shut down.

These were the actions of the Right Honourable Minister, the Health Secretary. Make of that what you will, but actions considered acceptable in a communist state were now mainstream and, as it seems, acceptable at the heart of Government.   

According to Oakeshott’s piece, the origins of mask mandates in the community were Dominic Cummings’s obsession with masks and a desire to please Ms. Sturgeon. However, the most important figures “Hancock, Whitty and Johnson knew full well that non-medical masks do very little to prevent transmission of the virus”. You could readily translate this to the fact that there was no high quality evidence to support mandates, as we pointed out in July 2020.

The taking down of the Spectator article by Facebook was just the start of the campaign. You could say we were naïve, but we didn’t realise we were enemy number one, along with some of our academic and journalist colleagues within a democratic state that used all its powers to silence those seen to peddle ‘radioactive’ views when in fact, all we were doing was looking at the available evidence – something we have done for decades across a range of healthcare interventions.

Fact-checking sites published critiques of our Spectator article. What they didn’t tell you is Facebook now funded them. Also, the Government didn’t tell you they were cosying up to social media sites to harness their influence. Oakeshott again:

Hancock reveals that his special adviser was speaking to Twitter about ‘tweaking their algorithms’. Later he personally texted his old coalition colleague Nick Clegg, now a big cheese at Facebook, to enlist his help.

In the U.S., Anthony Fauci is being deposed (required to give evidence) for his part in attacking scientists. A U.S. District Judge granted the request to depose Fauci, amongst others, because the Biden administration actively worked with social media companies to censor ‘disfavored’ viewpoints, likely in violation of First Amendment rights.

Yet in the U.K., the former minister gets to be a celebrity. Attempts to uncover the truth through Freedom of Information requests for meetings between Hancock and Clegg go unanswered. Backbench MPs should be outraged; instead, there is silence – those at the heart of the decision-making have moved on to better things.  

An anonymous BBC journalist stated to an All-Party Parliamentary Group of MPs and Peers how bad the situation was:

I am having to give this evidence anonymously because of the climate of fear within the newsroom of ‘going against the narrative’. When the daily death toll was read out – something we had never done for any other disease – my worry about the impact of the fearmongering on our audience increased. I raised my concerns with senior colleagues and the reply came back that suggested anyone who thinks differently from the editorial agenda is a ‘dissenter’ and lacks credibility regardless of their peer-reviewed and accredited experience, qualifications and education.

Alas, this is not all. According to the UKHSA, the official scientific rationale for mask mandates in the community is based on a review last updated in the summer of 2021 of 28 studies, two of which are trials and the rest studies of abysmal quality. The review, identified through a Parliamentary Question, is in two parts: the main body and supplementary tables reporting the data. The problem is that the review is full of errors: the two parts do not match and appear to have been written separately and not even proofread.

The events are now clear. Policies affecting millions were decided on whims, independent scientists were persecuted, and grossly substandard work was cooked up to justify an evidence-free policy if anyone bothered to look.

Yes, this is the U.K. In the absence of dissenters, only the people can ask questions and change the status quo. We pity and express solidarity with our colleagues who have lost their jobs, suffered threats and undergone the hairdryer treatment – however, we’d like them to keep going as they are doing. 

At the outset, we expressed the uncertainty in the evidence-base. Little has changed – the pandemic intervention policies were largely based on bad science, opinions and political views.

Dr. Carl Heneghan is the Oxford Professor of Evidence Based Medicine and Dr. Tom Jefferson is an epidemiologist based in Rome who works with Professor Heneghan on the Cochrane Collaboration. This article was first published on their Substack blog, Trust The Evidence, which you can subscribe to here.

https://dailysceptic.org/2022/12/12/the-shameful-crushing-of-dissenters/

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Christmas versus the pod people

 

On the Icke's headline page recently they had a piece by Neil Hague on Christmas and Saturnalia but they also had two pieces about the vision of some scientists to grow human babies in pods in a laboratory. ''Ok Mac but how are those two things related?'' Well let me make my case shipmates!

 

Neil's piece spoke about the two sides to Christmas and there's no denying that the whole affair has become more glitzy and more commercialised with each passing decade. It didn't used to be treated on an equal footing in Scotland with the new year celebration of Hogmanay which is not held on the old celtic new year of the 11th january; to celebrate the old new year you can join the burning of the clavie at Burghead which means that if you play your cards right in scotland you can get two new years per year.....nae bad!

 

But back to christmas....I think that a lot of the commercial pressure that has now exerted itself on christmas can be traced back to the ideology of consumerism which has been driven forward by the mega-corporations who have clearly seen an opportunity to make a buck at christmas time. TV programming and Tv advertising set the standards that the masses feel they need to live upto. Some people trace the red and white of santa's outfit to coca cola whilst others claim it has roots in siberian shamanism and the use of the amanita muscaria mushroom. So I do agree that there is an ugly face to christmas but here's the thing about that: you can opt out of it! Yes you have to resist all the pressure brought to bare just like we did with the covid jabs but you do have a choice. For this reason the commercialisation of christmas is far less of a threat than the loss of roots that can occur from blind iconoclastic destruction of old traditions and festivals.

 

Let's consider the other side of the coin. There is no doubt that a large element of the festival is relating to the halt of the suns southward descent on the horizon where it then rests for three days around christmas before beginning its northern journey, bringing longer days and greater warmth. I struggle to think of many things that are MORE worthy of celebration than the resurgence of the life bringing sun. If the sun is the heart of our solar system then the hearth is the heart of the home and the tradition of the burning of the yule log then finds its place in the festival. Christianity then joined the party and declared the holiday the birthday of Jesus. In a way i suppose that Jesus could be seen as the spiritual heart of christendom and therefore it makes sense to connect his birth with that physical heart of our solar system: the sun.

 

Some people see sinister connotations in santa and certainly the corporate worshippers of mammon have sought to use 'father christmas' as a way to boost their sales but lets zoom out here to look from a higher perspective through a much wider lens. By doing this we find that the old man is an archetype of myth that often guides the seeking hero by asking them questions that bring greater insight and by gifting them a talisman that aids them on their quest. Often depicted bearing a firebrand this archetype has, in northern europe been expressed as 'father christmas' and various forces since have clothed him in various garb that suits THEIR agendas but he is nevertheless the heritage of all mankind.

 

We are often told by very clever commentators that not all occultism is bad and that there is light and dark occultism. Lets consider then that the dark occultists have always and continue to take anything that is supposed to bring light and warmth and guidance into peoples lives and then they distort it and twist it out of shape to such an extent that what is left is repugnant to many who then seek to simply discard it without any deeper inspection.

 

The dark occultists would love to rob you of the outer warmth of your hearth by creating energy crises. They would love to block out the suns rays to create a dark world of sepsis through geoengineering. They would love to deny your connection to any deeper spiritual meaning in this life experience. Their neo-marxist footsoldiers would love to throw all of your traditions and memories and connections down the memory hole and make you a blank slate 'citizen' of the global technocracy run by their dark occult overlords. Once they have sucked your world empty of all warmth, spirit and meaning they will seek to plug you into their artificial intelligence. They want a slave race of pod people that aren't even born out of the loving connection between a man and a woman.

 

So i think rather than allowing them to mould christmas into what they want: a high pressure, wasteful glut of spending on baubles with a surface sheen but no inner substance, I personally, will be trying to enjoy the festival on my terms. Good food and drink is a great morale booster in the depths of winter and I enjoy the opportunity to take my foot off the gas, slow down and reflect on the year just past and my hopes for the coming year. We don't get to choose our family and nature's sorting hat throws people of all kinds of personality types together in combinations that don't always bring immediate gratification but consider personality types as like tools. Each family and tribe needs people of different abilities in order to meet different challenges. As conspiracy theorists we often know what it is like to not have our strengths recognised but if the key to happiness is appreciation then perhaps it helps to see something that someone else does well. In an ideal world their strength feeds back into the family to help everyone. Festivals have always brought communities together and without festivals like christmas many families might not see much of each other at all. In a world where the cabal are striving to drive wedges in everywhere including between men and women and between parents and children and between groups within society, it might not be a bad thing to hold onto a little unity. May the king of the forest bring you a talisman to help you on your journey.

Edited by Macnamara
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Captain's log part 3

 

As a self employed person with no holiday or sick pay i'm struggling to have sympathy with the well paid public sector workers carrying out these strikes over the festive period. It seems timed to cause maximum damage to our nation at a time of energy shortage. Some people worry about the lack of energy this winter but I personally think it is NEXT winter that we need to really worry about as an energy crisis will, in short order, translate into a FOOD crisis next year. In order to meet the pay demands of the public sector workers the government would have to pay in the region of £28 billion but governments have two ways to raise money: they can tax the population or they can print more currency. The super rich have long since taken advantage of the global network of tax havens tied to the city of london which means their wealth lies beyond the reach of the taxman. This means that if the government raise taxes it will be us working people who are then squeezed; but why should I pay more of my income to people who already get more perks than me? If on the other hand the government raises the money by money printing that will cause inflation which in turn will drive down the purchasing power of everyones money making us all poorer. So anyway you cut it I would be screwed along with millions of others.

 

Gilad Atzmon says that 'intersectionality' is about conditioning people to think in terms of their surface identity and NOT the content of their character for example to identify 'as a....' for example 'as a woman', 'as a trans', 'as a gay person etc, but what i've noticed as a straight, white, working male is that I am NEVER the beneficiary of the conspiracy! On the plus side this means i am never seduced by it. I see that a lot of people do get seduced at least by aspects of the conspiracy when they perceive it to be in their self-interest. I would argue that their perception that it is in their self-interest is ultimately a delusion however as in the end the only people who are going to benefit from the scheme of the elites is the elites themselves. Many people cannot yet see that however as they believe themselves to have 'skin in the game' of certain aspects of the conspiracy for example:

-MASS immigration

-anti-family

-anti-christian

-anti-white

-anti-heteronormative

 

Many people who have an axe to grind will then latch on to those aspects of the conspiracy they percieve to be a good thing (in terms of their own self interest) without seeing how they are helping to drive the wider agenda towards technocratic enslavement and depopulation. These people that are hoodwinked into doing this are what the soviets called 'useful idiots' helping to form the iconoclastic brownshirt demolition team of the elites as they shatter western civilisation to create their new globalised form of total slavery.

 

One feature of those being seduced that seems to recur is their faith in the state. This faith saw them all led by the nose into covid 'vaccination' centres to receive their multiple doses of experimental mRNA. This abjugation of the responsibility of thinking for themselves in favour of letting the state think for them is going to cost them dear. If however they can come to the realisation that the state is not only NOT their loving parent nor their god but has in fact committed a most malevolent crime against them they would be freed from their blind faith. They would be forced to re-evaluate their worldview and to find their own information instead of relying on the state to dictate reality to them. However many of them seem to be doubling down on their delusion even as their fellow jabbed drop all around them from heart conditions, strokes and rapid onset, aggressive forms of cancer.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How long has big tech been infiltrated by the intelligence services?

 

SINCE THE BEGINNING! All these big tech platforms were CREATED by the deep state.

Spooks infiltrate Silicon Valley: Facebook is riddled with ex-CIA agents – including President’s briefer who now runs 'harmful content' team – so many ex-FBI work at Twitter they have Slack channel and Google is rife with ex-CIA

  • Mint Press' Alan MacLeod found that former CIA agents made up some of the top ranks in almost every politically sensitive department at Meta
  • He also found that former FBI agents migrated to Twitter in droves
  • DailyMail.com has been able to track down many of these former intelligence officials who are now working at top tech companies 

By Melissa Koenig For Dailymail.Com

Published: 16:08 GMT, 22 December 2022 | Updated: 16:08 GMT, 22 December 2022

65852551-0-image-a-16_1671719142688.jpg

Former US government intelligence agents are now working across Silicon Valley in senior roles dedicated to censoring 'misinformation', DailyMail.com can disclose. 

A large number of ex-officers from the FBI, CIA, NSC and State Department have taken positions at Facebook, Twitter and Google

The revelation comes amid fears the FBI operated control over Twitter censorship and the Hunter Biden laptop story.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11562433/Facebook-riddled-ex-CIA-agents-ex-FBI-agents-work-Twitter.html

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...