Macnamara Posted November 17, 2020 Author Share Posted November 17, 2020 Are the government seeking to recruit psychopaths from all walks of life to carry out their MASS vaccination agenda? Covid vaccine: Volunteers with no medical experience will be trained to give out jab St John Ambulance will deliver training so volunteers can inject patients, according to leaked plans By Telegraph Reporters 17 November 2020 • 1:48am Thousands of volunteers with no medical background at all could be trained up to administer the coronavirus vaccine in a bid to deliver the Government's mass immunisation plans. St John Ambulance will be one of the organisations delivering training to those who sign up, a representative for the charity confirmed on Monday evening. In plans leaked to the Daily Mail, St John Ambulance said future vaccine volunteers would "be trained to deliver the actual injection to patients". They would also have to "potentially react to any immediate adverse reactions". https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/11/17/covid-vaccine-volunteers-no-medical-experience-will-trained/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted November 17, 2020 Author Share Posted November 17, 2020 (edited) Politicisation of science: ''When good science is suppressed, people die'' So what are we 'conspiracy theorists' claiming here? We are claiming that klaus schwab, the head of the world economic forum has written a book called 'the great reset' and that the globalist elites are now seeking to bring about that global reset to achieve what is also being called the 'fourth industrial revolution'. We are arguing that they have planned a global pandemic in an event called 'Event 201' which they then took live to create this current covid plandemic and that the reason they have done this is to use the resulting state of emergency to crack down in freedom of speech whilst simultaneously forcing through their great reset We are arguing that the science around vaccines is being politicised by those powerful interests who are at the same time using the state apparatus (working hand in glove with corrupt politicians who have been fluffed up by bill gates money) as well as the corporate media (also swimming in bill gates money) to create a climate of fear in which people are no longer able to discuss the potential dangers of vaccines From the BMJ: https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425 Editorials Kamran Abbasi, executive editor Covid-19: politicisation, “corruption,” and suppression of science BMJ 2020; 371 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m4425 (Published 13 November 2020) Cite this as: BMJ 2020;371:m4425 When good science is suppressed by the medical-political complex, people die Politicians and governments are suppressing science. They do so in the public interest, they say, to accelerate availability of diagnostics and treatments. They do so to support innovation, to bring products to market at unprecedented speed. Both of these reasons are partly plausible; the greatest deceptions are founded in a grain of truth. But the underlying behaviour is troubling. Science is being suppressed for political and financial gain. Covid-19 has unleashed state corruption on a grand scale, and it is harmful to public health.1 Politicians and industry are responsible for this opportunistic embezzlement. So too are scientists and health experts. The pandemic has revealed how the medical-political complex can be manipulated in an emergency—a time when it is even more important to safeguard science. The UK’s pandemic response provides at least four examples of suppression of science or scientists. First, the membership, research, and deliberations of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) were initially secret until a press leak forced transparency.2 The leak revealed inappropriate involvement of government advisers in SAGE, while exposing under-representation from public health, clinical care, women, and ethnic minorities. Indeed, the government was also recently ordered to release a 2016 report on deficiencies in pandemic preparedness, Operation Cygnus, following a verdict from the Information Commissioner’s Office.34 Next, a Public Health England report on covid-19 and inequalities. The report’s publication was delayed by England’s Department of Health; a section on ethnic minorities was initially withheld and then, following a public outcry, was published as part of a follow-up report.56 Authors from Public Health England were instructed not to talk to the media. Third, on 15 October, the editor of the Lancet complained that an author of a research paper, a UK government scientist, was blocked by the government from speaking to media because of a “difficult political landscape.”7 Now, a new example concerns the controversy over point-of-care antibody testing for covid-19.8 The prime minister’s Operation Moonshot depends on immediate and wide availability of accurate rapid diagnostic tests.9 It also depends on the questionable logic of mass screening—currently being trialled in Liverpool with a suboptimal PCR test.1011 The incident relates to research published this week by The BMJ, which finds that the government procured an antibody test that in real world tests falls well short of performance claims made by its manufacturers.1213 Researchers from Public Health England and collaborating institutions sensibly pushed to publish their study findings before the government committed to buying a million of these tests but were blocked by the health department and the prime minister’s office.14 Why was it important to procure this product without due scrutiny? Prior publication of research on a preprint server or a government website is compatible with The BMJ’s publication policy. As if to prove a point, Public Health England then unsuccessfully attempted to block The BMJ’s press release about the research paper. Politicians often claim to follow the science, but that is a misleading oversimplification. Science is rarely absolute. It rarely applies to every setting or every population. It doesn’t make sense to slavishly follow science or evidence. A better approach is for politicians, the publicly appointed decision makers, to be informed and guided by science when they decide policy for their public. But even that approach retains public and professional trust only if science is available for scrutiny and free of political interference, and if the system is transparent and not compromised by conflicts of interest. Suppression of science and scientists is not new or a peculiarly British phenomenon. In the US, President Trump’s government manipulated the Food and Drug Administration to hastily approve unproved drugs such as hydroxychloroquine and remdesivir.15 Globally, people, policies, and procurement are being corrupted by political and commercial agendas.16 The UK’s pandemic response relies too heavily on scientists and other government appointees with worrying competing interests, including shareholdings in companies that manufacture covid-19 diagnostic tests, treatments, and vaccines.17 Government appointees are able to ignore or cherry pick science—another form of misuse—and indulge in anti-competitive practices that favour their own products and those of friends and associates.18 How might science be safeguarded in these exceptional times? The first step is full disclosure of competing interests from government, politicians, scientific advisers, and appointees, such as the heads of test and trace, diagnostic test procurement, and vaccine delivery. The next step is full transparency about decision making systems, processes, and knowing who is accountable for what. Once transparency and accountability are established as norms, individuals employed by government should ideally only work in areas unrelated to their competing interests. Expertise is possible without competing interests. If such a strict rule becomes impractical, minimum good practice is that people with competing interests must not be involved in decisions on products and policies in which they have a financial interest. Governments and industry must also stop announcing critical science policy by press release. Such ill judged moves leave science, the media, and stock markets vulnerable to manipulation. Clear, open, and advance publication of the scientific basis for policy, procurements, and wonder drugs is a fundamental requirement.19 The stakes are high for politicians, scientific advisers, and government appointees. Their careers and bank balances may hinge on the decisions that they make. But they have a higher responsibility and duty to the public. Science is a public good. It doesn’t need to be followed blindly, but it does need to be fairly considered. Importantly, suppressing science, whether by delaying publication, cherry picking favourable research, or gagging scientists, is a danger to public health, causing deaths by exposing people to unsafe or ineffective interventions and preventing them from benefiting from better ones. When entangled with commercial decisions it is also maladministration of taxpayers’ money. Politicisation of science was enthusiastically deployed by some of history’s worst autocrats and dictators, and it is now regrettably commonplace in democracies.20 The medical-political complex tends towards suppression of science to aggrandise and enrich those in power. And, as the powerful become more successful, richer, and further intoxicated with power, the inconvenient truths of science are suppressed. When good science is suppressed, people die. References ↵ Geoghegan P. Cronyism and clientelism. London Review of Books 2020 Nov 5. https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v42/n21/peter-geoghegan/cronyism-and-clientelism ↵ Scally G, Jacobson B, Abbasi K . The UK’s public health response to covid-19. BMJ2020;369:m1932. doi:10.1136/bmj.m1932 pmid:32414712 FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar ↵ Iacobucci G . Pandemic preparedness: Government must release 2016 report, says information commissioner. BMJ2020;371:m3953. doi:10.1136/bmj.m3953 pmid:33046458 FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar ↵ Department of Health and Social Care. Policy paper. Annex B: Exercise Cygnus report. 5 Nov 2020. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-pandemic-preparedness/exercise-cygnus-report-accessible-report ↵ Public Health England. Disparities in the risk and outcomes of COVID-19. 2020. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/908434/Disparities_in_the_risk_and_outcomes_of_COVID_August_2020_update.pdf ↵ Khunti K, Platt L, Routen A, Abbasi K . Covid-19 and ethnic minorities: an urgent agenda for overdue action. BMJ2020;369:m2503. doi:10.1136/bmj.m2503 pmid:32576558 FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar ↵ Horton R. Tweet, 15 Oct 2020. ↵ Boseley S. Antibody tests bought by UK government “less accurate than maker claims.” Guardian 2020 Nov 12. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/nov/12/covid-antibody-test-bought-uk-government-less-accurate-than-makers-claim ↵ Iacobucci G, Coombes R . Covid-19: Government plans to spend £100bn on expanding testing to 10 million a day. BMJ2020;370:m3520. doi:10.1136/bmj.m3520 pmid:32907851 FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar ↵ Iacobucci G . Covid-19: mass population testing is rolled out in Liverpool. BMJ2020;371:m4268. doi:10.1136/bmj.m4268 pmid:33144291 FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar ↵ Iacobucci G . Covid-19: rapid test missed over 50% of positive cases in Manchester pilot. BMJ2020;371:m4323. doi:10.1136/bmj.m4323 pmid:33158908 FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar ↵ Mulchandani R, Jones HE, Taylor-Phillips S, et al., EDSAB-HOME and COMPARE Investigators . Accuracy of UK Rapid Test Consortium (UK-RTC) “AbC-19 Rapid Test” for detection of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection in key workers: test accuracy study. BMJ2020;371:m4262.pmid:33177070 Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar ↵ Gill D, Ponsford MJ . Testing for antibodies to SARS-CoV-2. BMJ2020;371:m4288. doi:10.1136/bmj.m4288 FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar ↵ Armstrong S . Covid-19: Government buried negative data on its favoured antibody test. BMJ2020;371:m4353. doi:10.1136/bmj.m4353 FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar ↵ Cohen K, Kupferschmidt K. The “very, very bad look” of remdesivir, the first FDA-approved COVID-19 drug. Science 2020 Oct 28. https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/10/very-very-bad-look-remdesivir-first-fda-approved-covid-19-drug ↵ Transparency International. Corruption and covid-19—the story so far. 8 Jul 2020. https://www.transparency.org.uk/corruption-coronavirus-covid-19-latest ↵ Ennals E. Government test tsar has £770,000 shares in drugs firm that sold us £13million of “pointless” antibody screening kits—after it emerged that Sir Patrick Vallance has a financial interest in company racing to find vaccine. Daily Mail 2020 Sep 26. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8776339/Test-tsar-770-000-shares-firm-sold-13million-pointless-antibody-screening-kits.html ↵ Armstrong S . Covid-19: Government faces legal action over £75m contract for antibody tests. BMJ2020;371:m4427. doi:10.1136/bmj.m4427 FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar ↵ Mahase E . Covid-19: Vaccine candidate may be more than 90% effective, interim results indicate. BMJ2020;371:m4347. doi:10.1136/bmj.m4347 pmid:33168562 FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar ↵ Bollyky TJ, Kickbusch I . Preparing democracies for pandemics. BMJ2020;371:m4088. doi:10.1136/bmj.m4088 pmid:33097482 FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar Edited November 17, 2020 by Macnamara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted November 17, 2020 Author Share Posted November 17, 2020 (edited) This week in the news... ''Death of free speech at the Guardian as columnist Suzanne Moore quits after 300 staff sign petition against her claim that gender is more than a 'feeling''' https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8958283/Columnist-Suzanne-Moore-quits-Guardian.html A guardian columnist has been driven off by a letter signed by 300 of her co-workers who do not agree that being a woman is a biological thing and that instead it is simply a state of mind. A quote from the piece says: Her column, written on March 2, said: 'We have gone through the looking-glass and are being told that sex is a construct. 'It is said that sex is merely assigned at birth, rather than being a material fact – actually, though, sex is recognisable in the womb (which is what enables foetal sex selection). 'Sex is not a feeling. Female is a biological classification that applies to all living species. If you produce large immobile gametes, you are female. You haven't 'gone through the looking glass' Suzanne! If you went through the looking glass you'd realise that society is being gender-bended through the MASS useage of hormone mimicing, endocrine disrupting chemicals which can be found in all kinds of everyday objects, foods, packaging, products etc. The trans agenda that you have threatened with your statements is about NORMALISING the changes now occurring in society. That brings us to the next story: Toxic pesticides used to treat cats and dogs for FLEAS are contaminating English rivers and harming aquatic life, study warns Researchers find samples from English rivers contaminated with two chemicals These chemicals - fipronil and imidacloprid - are in flea and tick pet treatments They go from household water waste to waste treatment plants and enter rivers By Jonathan Chadwick For Mailonline Published: 11:59, 17 November 2020 | Updated: 11:59, 17 November 2020 Pesticides that are used to treat cats and dogs for fleas are causing 'widespread contamination' of English rivers, a new study warns. Scientists have found two neurotoxic pesticides – fipronil and imidacloprid – in river samples in concentrations that 'far exceed accepted safe limits'. Both chemicals are banned from agricultural use due to the toxic effects on insects, birds, fish, mammals and other creatures. But they are still used in veterinary flea products and are applied to millions of dogs and cats in Britain. The experts analysed data gathered by the Environment Agency based on samples taken from 20 English waterways between 2016 and 2018.They found that fipronil was detected in 98 per cent of freshwater samples, while imidacloprid was found in 66 per cent. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-8957295/Pesticides-used-treat-cats-dogs-contaminating-English-rivers.html Finally: Police admit they 'let the public down' over Manchester Arena bombing by failing to patrol site before terror attack which killed 22 people Salman Abedi murdered 22 people at Manchester Arena on May 22, 2017 The inquiry heard how most senior officer meant to be on duty never arrived Two BTP officers took a two-hour meal break that saw them leave the arena No officers were patrolling when Abedi travelled from Victoria to the City Room Assistant Chief Constable Sean O'Callaghan, of British Transport Police, said 'the attack that happened that night certainly happened on our watch, yes' By Henry Martin For Mailonline Published: 09:29, 17 November 2020 | Updated: 09:31, 17 November 2020 Suicide bomber Salman Abedi detonated his homemade rucksack bomb in the foyer of the arena, known as the City Room, at the end of the gig, murdering 22 bystanders and injuring hundreds more on May 22, 2017. The inquiry into the attack has heard how the most senior officer who was meant to be on duty that night never arrived, having said he was doing a 'drive-by' inspection of a 'sensitive site'. Also, two British Transport Police officers took a two-hour meal break that saw them leave the arena on a five-mile trip to buy kebabs, and no officers were patrolling when Abedi travelled from Victoria Station tram platform to the City Room. Assistant Chief Constable Sean O'Callaghan, of British Transport Police (BTP), was asked by Paul Greaney QC, counsel to the inquiry, whether it was fair to say that BTP 'let the public down in their policing of the City Room?' Mr O'Callaghan replied: 'The attack that happened that night, certainly happened on our watch, yes. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8956827/Police-admit-let-public-Manchester-Arena-bombing.html But is crap policing the only cause here or is the climate of fear that has been created in our country through political correctness also part of the problem? I was scared of being called racist, says guard who left Manchester Arena bomber alone https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/i-was-scared-of-being-called-racist-says-guard-who-left-manchester-arena-bomber-alone-9wz8hds0c Edited November 17, 2020 by Macnamara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted November 18, 2020 Author Share Posted November 18, 2020 On 11/8/2020 at 4:25 PM, Macnamara said: Molecular Mimicry Molecular Mimicry—Understanding the Link between Vaccines and Autoimmune Disease March 20, 2018 By the World Mercury Project Team Autoimmune diseases have become increasingly common in the United States and other high-income countries over the past several decades and now affect an estimated 5%-10% of the population in those countries. The broad category of “autoimmune disease” comprises over 100 different rheumatic, endocrinological, gastrointestinal and neurological conditions that ensue when the body’s immune responses get misdirected against itself. Researchers generally agree that environmental factors (including drugs and chemicals) are strongly to blame for the rise in autoimmune disorders, possibly in conjunction with genetic and epigenetic influences—and studies dating back to the mid-1990s indicate that vaccines, with their unique configuration of viral or bacterial antigens and adjuvants, are a biologically plausible trigger. The pathogenic hallmark of autoimmune disease is the production of proteins called autoantibodies, whereby the immune system mistakenly attacks the body’s own organs, tissues and cells instead of fighting external pathogens. Vaccines can prompt autoantibody production through a mechanism called “molecular mimicry.” Consider that countries hard hit by covid have also had previous vaccination programmes for example roll outs of the flu vaccines that could then through molecular mimicry create autoantibodies: New Cause of COVID-19 Blood Clots Identified Haley Otman November 02, 2020 2:00 PM A new study reveals the virus triggers production of antibodies circulating through the blood, causing clots in people hospitalized with the disease. Blood clots continue to wreak havoc for patients with severe COVID-19 infection, and a new study explains what may spark them in up to half of patients. The culprit: an autoimmune antibody that’s circulating in the blood, attacking the cells and triggering clots in arteries, veins, and microscopic vessels. Blood clots can cause life-threatening events like strokes. And, in COVID-19, microscopic clots may restrict blood flow in the lungs, impairing oxygen exchange. Outside of novel coronavirus infection, these clot-causing antibodies are typically seen in patients who have the autoimmune disease antiphospholipid syndrome. The connection between autoantibodies and COVID-19 was unexpected, says co-corresponding author Yogen Kanthi, M.D., an assistant professor at the Michigan Medicine Frankel Cardiovascular Center and a Lasker Investigator at the National Institutes of Health’s National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. “In patients with COVID-19, we continue to see a relentless, self-amplifying cycle of inflammation and clotting in the body,” Kanthi says. “Now we’re learning that autoantibodies could be a culprit in this loop of clotting and inflammation that makes people who were already struggling even sicker.” ‘Some of the worst clotting we’ve ever seen’ Co-corresponding author Jason Knight, M.D., Ph.D., a rheumatologist at Michigan Medicine, has been studying antiphospholipid syndrome antibodies in the general population for years. “Half of the patients hospitalized with COVID-19 were positive for at least one of the autoantibodies, which was quite a surprise,” says Knight, also an associate professor of internal medicine and a leading expert on diseases caused by autoantibodies. In the new Science Translational Medicine publication, they found about half of the patients who were very sick with COVID-19 were exhibiting a combination of high levels of both the dangerous antibodies and super-activated neutrophils, which are destructive, exploding white blood cells. In April, the team was the first to report that patients hospitalized for severe COVID-19 had higher levels of neutrophil extracellular traps in their blood. https://labblog.uofmhealth.org/lab-report/new-cause-of-covid-19-blood-clots-identified Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted November 18, 2020 Author Share Posted November 18, 2020 From the article in the post above: “We don’t yet know what is triggering the body to produce these antibodies, so the next step would be additional research to identify the triggers and the targets of the antibodies,” Knight adds. Well i suggest you consider the following study: Antiphospholipid Syndrome and Vaccines May 2015 DOI: 10.1002/9781118663721.ch15 In book: Vaccines and Autoimmunity (pp.141-146) Authors: Miri Blank Paola Cruz-Tapias Abstract Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune multisystemic disease associated with recurrent fetal loss, thromboembolic phenomena, thrombocytopenia, and neurological, cardiac, and dermatological involvement. APS is characterized by the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies, which bind negatively charged phospholipids, mainly through β2-glycoprotein I (β2GPI). Tetanus toxoid (TTd) is a potent exotoxin produced by the bacterium Clostridium tetani. DNA hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination was given to 85 healthy students and, 1 month post-vaccination, a minority of individuals showed changes in IgG or IgM anticardiolipin and anti-β2GPI antibodies or lupus anticoagulant. Toplak et al. reported the presence of anti-β2GPI antibodies in 15% of 92 healthy medical workers up to 6 months post-influenza vaccination. Molecular mimicry has been proposed as one of the mechanisms by which experimental APS can occur in association with pathogens. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/300632130_Antiphospholipid_Syndrome_and_Vaccines Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted November 18, 2020 Author Share Posted November 18, 2020 10 hours ago, Macnamara said: Toplak et al. reported the presence of anti-β2GPI antibodies in 15% of 92 healthy medical workers up to 6 months post-influenza vaccination. Molecular mimicry has been proposed as one of the mechanisms by which experimental APS can occur in association with pathogens. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/300632130_Antiphospholipid_Syndrome_and_Vaccines You need to look at who in the family has been vaccinated and what vaccines they have received but clearly we are not looking at an infectious virus which is why the scientists are left 'baffled'. What we ARE looking at is the impact of a harmful environmental factor and i would suggest the main culprits would be vaccines (especially the influenza vaccine) and microwaves for example from 5G and it shouldn't be ruled out that a synergistic reaction might be caused by a combination of the two... Australian kids baffle doctors after developing Covid-19 antibodies without ever testing positive 18 Nov, 2020 10:13 A bizarre case in Australia has stunned medical researchers, after children of Covid-19-positive parents developed extremely effective antibodies without ever testing positive for the virus themselves. In a study published on Tuesday in the medical journal Nature Communications, researchers discuss a family of five in which both parents contracted Covid-19 after attending a wedding without their children in March. Approximately one week after returning, the mother and father developed symptoms such as a cough, congested nose, fever and headache. The entire family was then tested for the virus, but only the parents tested positive, despite ongoing close proximity to their children, all of whom tested negative. “It was jaw-droppingly amazing because they’d spent a week-and-a-half with us while we were Covid-positive,” mother Leila Sawenko said. The two sons, aged nine and seven, began to develop mild symptoms such as a runny nose, and the entire family was tested again. Once again, the children’s tests again came back negative. The youngest child, a five-year-old girl, remained entirely asymptomatic throughout the entire episode, despite continuous close contact with the parents, including sleeping in the same bed (physical distancing precautions were reportedly not possible in the home). The peculiar test results prompted medical researchers to ask the family to participate in a study, to which they agreed. Samples of blood, saliva, stool, urine and nose-and-throat swabs were taken from each family member every two to three days over the course of several weeks. https://www.rt.com/news/507049-australian-kids-asymptomatic-coronavirus-antibodies/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted November 18, 2020 Author Share Posted November 18, 2020 Just now, Macnamara said: clearly we are not looking at an infectious virus which is why the scientists are left 'baffled'. What we ARE looking at is the impact of a harmful environmental factor A bizarre case in Australia has stunned medical researchers, after children of Covid-19-positive parents developed extremely effective antibodies without ever testing positive for the virus themselves. Public health England document admits that their PCR test does NOT test for infectious viruses: https://davidicke.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Understanding_Cycle_Threshold__Ct__in_SARS-CoV-2_RT-PCR_-1.pdf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted November 18, 2020 Author Share Posted November 18, 2020 DNA can be affected by magnetic fields The following study says that human lymphoid cells infected by the epstein-barr genome can then be modulated by 5G microwaves. So lets pause to consider here that the new experimental RNA vaccines that are being pushed out right now can indeed affect the human genome. Meanwhile 5G is also being rolled out so the question then is what effect will 5G have on all those who have had the covid RNA vaccines that have affected their genome? Microwaves (5G) can activate dormant viruses J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol. 1997;16(2-3):205-7. Exposure to a 50 Hz electromagnetic field induces activation of the Epstein-Barr virus genome in latently infected human lymphoid cells. Grimaldi S1, Pasquali E, Barbatano L, Lisi A, Santoro N, Serafino A, Pozzi D. Author information Abstract The EBV genome in latently infected lymphoid cells offers an opportunity to follow effects on the transcriptional and translational product clearly distinguishable from those of the host cell genome. Exposure of Akata cells, a human lymphoid cell line latently infected by the EBV genome, to a 50 Hz EMF resulted in an increased number of cells expressing the virus early antigens. This finding provides additional evidence that DNA can be modulated by a magnetic field. PMID: 9276003 [Indexed for MEDLINE] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9276003 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted November 19, 2020 Author Share Posted November 19, 2020 (edited) Free speech over vaccine dangers Britains top counter terrorism police officer has called for ''a debate for society to have about free speech and responsibility and people who are spreading misinformation that could cost people’s lives... whether that is the correct thing for this society to allow to happen” in the mainstream media for example the following newspaper article: https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/met-police-terrorism-coronavirus-anti-vaxxers-b73161.html Well mate i've got news for you: we are already having that debate! That's right we, the general public, are already discussing these matters in the only place we can which is online. We are not allowed to gather in pubs or in each others houses or in public spaces so we speak to each other ONLINE. DEMOCRACY began in greece where the public met in the public AGORA to discuss matters of public importance and today our agora is ONLINE on social media including forums such as this one. Its a public space and we know you are listening so nothing is being hidden here from anyone. We are simply exercising our democratic right to discuss matters of public importance. We are doing this because we believe in our right to freedom of speech. Now lets consider the next part of your proposed debate which is whether or not misinformation can cost peoples lives and whether or not its right for us to let that happen. We believe that the misinformation given by the government and its advisors like neil fergusson in order to justify a lockdown has been incorrect and that it has indeed cost lives. Now being peace loving people we don't really know what to do about that. We haven't picked up pitch forks and flaming torches and stormed the parliament, no we have quietly and calmly and in a very british way gone to the public space (the online agora of social media) to voice our outrage at government actions that we disagree with Unlike the government we haven't killed anyone. So the answer to your question of whether or not we should allow that kind of misinformation to be spread is that no we shouldn't which is why we are online correcting the governments lies. The corporate media has challenged some of those lies but have also shamelessly pushed some of them too and the answer to what we do about them is that we are using their media less and less and instead using the independent media which is less beholden to special interests so that we can get unfiltered information with which to make informed choices There are very valid questions being asked about the vaccines and also about the conflicts of interests of key advisors to the government such as patrick vallance and chris whitty and whether or not they stand to make money out of the vaccine roll outs and there are even questions over politicians such as rishi sunak who it appears has links to a hedge fund called theleme that will profit from the moderna vaccine So we have some very reasonable and justifiable concerns and we are exercising our democratic freedom of speech rights to come together in a public agora in order to discuss these matters Unfortunately I suspect that what you mean when you say there should be a discussion is that a stage-managed and scripted discussion should take place involving the systems hand picked talking heads who should then dictate down to the rest of us what the accepted views are to have on these issues. No doubt the general public will be entirely frozen out of that 'debate'. Now i'll put another charge to you which is that despite being an anti-terror chief, i would say that your comments which appear to threaten our democratic rights can and will cause terror in the british public and that you are causing the very thing your job title claims you are supposed to be preventing. Edited November 19, 2020 by Macnamara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted November 19, 2020 Author Share Posted November 19, 2020 (edited) On 11/17/2020 at 6:17 PM, Macnamara said: From the BMJ: https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425 Covid-19: politicisation, “corruption,” and suppression of science Politicians and governments are suppressing science. Science is being suppressed for political and financial gain. Covid-19 has unleashed state corruption on a grand scale, and it is harmful to public health.1 Politicians and industry are responsible for this opportunistic embezzlement. So too are scientists and health experts. The pandemic has revealed how the medical-political complex can be manipulated in an emergency—a time when it is even more important to safeguard science. The Medical-political Complex ''Pfizer’s history of being fined billions for illegal marketing and for bribing government officials to help them cover up an illegal drug trial that killed eleven children (among other crimes) has gone unmentioned by most mass media outlets, which instead have celebrated the apparently imminent approval of the company’s COVID vaccine without questioning the company’s history or that the mRNA technology used in the vaccine has sped through normal safety trial protocols and has never been approved for human use. Also unmentioned is that the head of the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Patrizia Cavazzoni, is the former Pfizer vice president for product safety who covered up the connection of one of its products to birth defects.'' https://www.technocracy.news/governments-launch-cyber-warfare-against-citizenry-to-overcome-vaccine-hesitancy/ 'SAGE was put on a pedestal... but their models clearly didn’t reflect reality': Tory MP slams scientific advisers as damning documentary reveals they relied on WIKIPEDIA data and wrongly predicted virus would peak in June SAGE admitted early virus modelling based on figures from online encyclopedia Committee of scientists advising PM also had no expert on human coronavirus Dubious data formed the basis for the group's calls for first national lockdown Experts predicted that the peak would be in June - but it actually came in April Impact of care home staff spreading Covid by working in multiple sites not considered Lockdown 1.0 – Following the Science? airs on BBC Two tonight at 9pm By Connor Boyd, Assistant Health Editor and Martin Robinson, Chief Reporter For Mailonline Published: 00:01, 19 November 2020 | Updated: 11:42, 19 November 2020 No10's scientific advisers relied on dubious data from Wikipedia to help steer Britain through the spring's coronavirus crisis and wrongly predicted the peak of the first wave by two months, an explosive new documentary has claimed. Members of the Government's Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) admitted early virus modelling was based on unverified figures from the online encyclopedia, which can be edited and managed by members of the public. Tory MP Steve Baker, who has refused to support the Prime Minister’s second lockdown, told MailOnline: ‘Some of those claiming to be “following the science” seem not to understand the meaning of the word. SAGE has been put on a pedestal as if they are able to produce a single version of the truth. It’s not possible. ‘We were given terrifying 500,000 death figures predicted by modelling that was completely flawed and scientists will no longer defend them. It was the same with NHS overcrowding – and yet that hasn’t happened. ‘We cannot go on like this any longer. The public deserve better than this. We cannot go on with public policy based on models that clearly didn’t reflect reality’. One prominent Oxford University scientist told MailOnline using Wikipedia to guide Britain through the crisis was 'absolutely unacceptable', describing it as a 'damning reflection of our lack of preparedness'. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8961245/SAGE-used-dodgy-data-WIKIPEDIA-model-Covid-crisis-spring-BBC-documentary-reveals.html Rishi Sunak refuses to disclose whether he will profit from Moderna vaccine Poppy Wood Tuesday 17 November 2020 5:44 pm Chancellor Rishi Sunak has refused to disclose whether he will profit from a surge in Moderna’s share price, after the US biotech firm yesterday announced its coronavirus vaccine proved almost 95 per cent effective in trials. Sunak was a founding partner of London-based hedge fund Theleme Partners — a major investor in Moderna — before leaving in 2013 to enter a career in British politics. Stock market filings show Theleme has a $500m (£377m) investment in Moderna, which accounts for around 20 per cent of the total $2.5bn-worth of shares it manages. It is unclear whether the chancellor maintained any investment in the hedge fund following his departure. The company is registered in the Cayman Islands — a tax haven which does not require companies to make their accounts public. Sunak last year declared in a list of ministers’ interests that he was the beneficiary of a blind trust, the contents of which have not been disclosed. But Sunak today refused to disclose whether his investments included a stake in either Theleme’s fund or Moderna when his blind trust was created. https://www.cityam.com/rishi-sunak-refuses-to-disclose-whether-he-will-profit-from-moderna-vaccine/ Portuguese Court Rules PCR Tests As Unreliable & Unlawful To Quarantine People November 18, 2020 A Portuguese appeals court has ruled that PCR tests are unreliable and that it is unlawful to quarantine people based solely on a PCR test. The court stated, the test’s reliability depends on the number of cycles used and the viral load present. Citing Jaafar et al. 2020, the court concludes that “if someone is tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the rule in most laboratories in Europe and the US), the probability that said person is infected is less than 3%, and the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%.” The court further notes that the cycle threshold used for the PCR tests currently being made in Portugal is unknown. The threshold cycles used in PCR tests in India is between 37 and 40, which makes the reliability of the PCR test less than 3% and the false positive rate as high as 97%. https://greatgameindia.com/portuguese-court-pcr-tests-unreliable/ Immune Enhancement ''Normally, researchers would take months to test for the possibility of vaccine enhancement in animals. Given the urgency to stem the spread of the new coronavirus, some drugmakers are moving straight into small-scale human tests, without waiting for the completion of such animal tests. “I understand the importance of accelerating timelines for vaccines in general, but from everything I know, this is not the vaccine to be doing it with,” Dr Peter Hotez, dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine, told Reuters. Hotez worked on development of a vaccine for SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome), the coronavirus behind a major 2003 outbreak, and found that some vaccinated animals developed more severe disease compared with unvaccinated animals when they were exposed to the virus. “There is a risk of immune enhancement,” said Hotez. “The way you reduce that risk is first you show it does not occur in laboratory animals.”'' https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-vaccines-insight-idUSKBN20Y1GZ Edited November 19, 2020 by Macnamara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted November 22, 2020 Author Share Posted November 22, 2020 (edited) Finally a little perspective in the mainstream media (see article below)! Its just a shame that in the same breath the daily mail push the vaccine propaganda.....folks think logically about this.....you've made an article saying essentially that the whole covid-flu-hysteria thing is being blown up out of all proportion in order to justify the lockdowns so if the threat is not real (on the scale they claim it is) and the lockdown is not therefore justified then ask yourselves why they would need to uphold the lie in order to impose a lockdown? Yes there is the whole 'great reset' to remould the economy aspect so yes that is definately a part of it but clearly we can see that the vaccine is a key part of their entire swindle. Now either you believe that is just ruthless profiteering driven by a corrupt relationship between government and big pharma or there is something more nefarious going on but the point is that surely if you can see that the hysteria has been hyped in order to justify the lockdown and that the vaccine has been touted as the golden ticket out of lockdown? So the purpose of the lockdown IS to bully the population into this vaccine which according to your own article the public don't need because the threat has been blown up out of all proportion! So if the vaccine isn't needed then why is it still going ahead and why are you still promoting it? You've questioned the lockdown and that's great that you have done that but now its time to take it to the next step and question the vaccine itself because that is the sick punchline of this entire joke We are running out of time.....people still listen to you.....so you have a duty of care here to warn the public; if the lockdown is unjustified then so is the vaccine so muster your journalistic integrity and report it! What they DON'T tell you about Covid: Fewer beds taken up than last year, deaths a fraction of the grim forecasts, 95% of fatalities had underlying causes... and how the facts can be twisted to strike fear in our hearts Despite the fearmongering, the number of Covid-19 deaths is significantly lower than the peak back in April Latest ONS estimate shows that in the week ending November 14, new infections were already levelling off GCHQ has embedded a team in Downing Street to provide Boris Johnson with real-time updates of Covid-19 Analysts will sift through vast amounts of data to ensure Boris Johnson has the most up-to-date information With the nation’s health at stake, it was revealed this week that GCHQ has embedded a team in Downing Street to provide Boris Johnson with real-time updates to combat the ‘emerging and changing threat’ posed by Covid-19. The intelligence analysts will sift through vast amounts of data to ensure the Prime Minister has the most up-to-date information on the spread of the virus. But what exactly should Mr Johnson be looking for? Here, ROSS CLARK reveals what he should be asking… How accurate were the Government’s grim predictions? The short answer is: not very. In a July report commissioned by Chief Scientific Adviser Sir Patrick Vallance, scientists estimated that there could be 119,000 deaths if a second spike coincided with a peak of winter flu. Yesterday, that figure stood at 54,286 – less than half that. In fact, the second peak seems to have passed – over the past week there has been an average of 22,287 new infections a day, down from 24,430 the week before. In mid-September, Sir Patrick made the terrifying claim that the UK could see 50,000 new coronavirus cases a day by mid-October unless more draconian restrictions were introduced. Yet we have never got near that figure. What about its prophecies on deaths? Ditto. Its warnings simply don’t bear any relation to reality. During the ‘Halloween horror show’ press conference used by Sir Patrick and Chief Medical Officer Professor Chris Whitty to scare the Government into implementing a second lockdown, one of their slides suggested that daily Covid-19 deaths could reach 4,000 a day by December. Chief Medical Officer Professor Chris Whitty, pictured on October 31, when the second national lockdown was announced, had shown a slide predicting up to 4,000 deaths a day by December. But with ten days to go, we're still at less than 15 per cent of that figure With ten days to go, we’re still at less than 15 per cent of that figure. In fact, as the graph above shows, the current death rate is significantly below almost every modelled winter scenario. Are hospitals close to full capacity? The answer is ‘no’ – contrary to what the Government experts would have you think after they last month published a chart that gave the impression that hospitals were close to overflowing, when at least half didn’t have a single Covid-19 patient. Currently, only 13 per cent of NHS beds are occupied by patients with Covid-19. On Monday this week, 16,271 hospitals beds across the UK were taken up with patients who had tested positive for Covid-19. +15 +15 On Monday this week, 16,271 hospitals beds across the UK were taken up with patients who had tested positive for Covid-19, a steady rise from last Monday, when there were 14,279 Covid patients. Remarkably, the number of NHS England beds currently occupied is lower than last year’s average This did show a steady rise from the previous Monday, when there were 14,279 patients with Covid. But to put this figure into perspective, the NHS in England had 101,255 general and acute beds available in March of this year plus 15,392 in Scotland and 10,563 in Wales. How does it compare with last year? Remarkably, as the graph shows, the number of NHS England beds currently occupied is lower than last year’s average. On November 5, the most recent date available, there were actually 1,293 fewer patients in hospital beds than last year’s November average. Surely intensive care beds are full? Some hospitals are under pressure but that is not the picture everywhere as the chart above shows. On Wednesday, 1,430 people with Covid-19 were occupying beds with mechanical ventilation. +15 +15 Despite the fanare surrounding the construction of the Nightingale hospitals (such as Sunderland's, pictured on its opening day in May) they were never more than 1.23 per cent full Given that before the crisis there were 4,119 intensive care beds in England plus 269 in Scotland and 153 in Wales, roughly only 31 per cent of ICU beds – not including those which have been recently converted from normal beds – are currently occupied by patients with Covid. In fact, on November 8, the number of occupied critical beds was actually lower than five-year average for 2015-19. Even at the height of the first wave in the spring, the percentage of mechanical ventilation beds in existing NHS hospitals that were used never exceeded 62 per cent, according to a study by University College London. But wasn’t that because of the Nightingale hospitals? Not at all. In fact, despite all the fanfare surrounding the Nightingale hospitals’ rapid construction, they were never more than 1.23 per cent full. Moreover, doctors are now far better prepared to treat Covid-19, such as knowing when and when not to put patients on ventilators. So who is Covid-19 killing? To put it simply, the victims are overwhelmingly the elderly and those with pre-existing conditions. Of the 37,470 Covid-19 deaths recorded by NHS England up to November 18, 53.7 percent were of people aged over 80. In comparison, there have been just 275 deaths (only 0.7 per cent of the total) in people under 40. And crucially, those who have died from Covid-19 are overwhelmingly likely to have suffered from a pre-existing condition. Of those who have died from coronavirus, 35,806 people (95.6 per cent of the total) had at least one pre-existing serious medical condition. In fact, there have been just 42 deaths of people aged under 40 without a pre-existing condition. What count as pre-existing conditions? While there has been lots of discussion about how a person’s lifestyle – their weight or general respiratory condition, for example – makes them more vulnerable to Covid-19, the truth is that those who die with pre-existing conditions tend to be suffering from serious, debilitating diseases. Some 27 per cent of them had diabetes, while 18 per cent had dementia – both of which render a person extremely vulnerable to any viral infection. Are more dying now than in the first wave? No. The number of Covid-19 deaths is significantly lower than the peak in April as the graph above shows. On April 21, for example, there were 1,224 Covid-19 deaths, and a daily average for the week of 838. Yesterday, 511 new deaths were reported. Are more dying now than last year? Despite what the fear-mongers would have you think, deaths are not far above average for this time of year as the graph above shows. +15 Yes, in the week to November 6, overall deaths in England and Wales stood at 11,812 – which was 14.3 per cent, or 1,481 deaths higher, than the five-year average. But that hides the fact that in contrast to the spring, when deaths from non-Covid-19 causes were running above average, non-Covid-19 deaths in recent weeks have actually been running substantially below average. Surely more elderly people are dying than normal? It doesn’t look like it. According to the latest Office for National Statistics (ONS) figures – for October 2020 – in spite of all the Covid-19 deaths, the average death rate in the over-75s was significantly lower this year than it was last October – 6,901.7 per 100,000 people, compared with 7141.7 for last year. But isn’t the infection rate now going up? The latest ONS estimate shows that in the week ending November 14, new infections were already levelling off: one in 80 people in England had the disease that week, compared with 1 in 85 the week before. And it could now be falling: according to research published this week by scientists at Cambridge University – whose data is used by the Government’s Sage advisory group – infection rates of Covid-19 have actually stopped growing across England. +15 The Government's Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) said the reproduction 'R' rate - the average number of people each Covid-19 patient passes the disease to - had fallen slightly to a maximum of 1.1, from a maximum of 1.2 last week, and could be as low as 1.0 or lower in every region of Britain Indeed, they claim, the R rate – the average number of people infected by somebody with the virus – has fallen to one. If the figure is below one, the epidemic subsides; above one and it grows; and if it is one, infection rates stay the same. Couldn’t that just be an anomaly? Actually, that figure for the R rate tallies with a number of other studies. The Government’s latest estimate – derived from Imperial College London’s REACT study, which has been swabbing tens of thousands of people every week – is that the R number for England as a whole is currently between 1 and 1.2. Meanwhile, the Covid-19 Symptom Study run by King’s College London, even puts the R number at 0.9 – the lowest it has been since August. Whatever the truth, data released by the ONS yesterday confirmed that infection rates are levelling off in England and Scotland. Does it matter when the elderly are more likely to be infected? That’s the claim of critics of the Great Barrington Declaration – which in October called on governments to abandon one-size-fits-all lockdowns in favour of targeted shielding – who believe that the current wave of infection will tear through the elderly. +15 The latest ONS estimate shows that in the week ending November 14, new infections were already levelling off. Scientists at Cambridge University believe the national R number has fallen to one, meaning the country's infection rate stays the same Yet the infection rate is actually highest in school-age children and students – the least vulnerable demographics – and lowest among the over 70s. In the week to November 14, the infection rate among secondary school pupils was 2.03 per cent, while in those over 70 it was just 0.48 per cent and falling. What about the areas seeing a spike? There is certainly a regional variation when it comes to rates of infection – with the North generally seeing higher levels than the South. One of the reasons the figures may seem particularly striking is because, embarrassingly for the Government, the same figures over the autumn were based on a data error, which reported student infections as happening at their parents’ address – predominantly in the South. At the height of the problem, in September and October, one in eight cases was reported to the wrong local authority. Isn’t mass testing going to fix all this? Don’t bet on it. The Government has put a lot of faith in Operation Moonshot – its plan to test the entire population once a week using ‘lateral flow tests’, a type of Covid-19 test that give results in only an hour. Yet their rapidity comes with a cost: they are not very reliable. +15 +15 According to a recent study by the University of Oxford and Public Health England’s Porton Down laboratory, the LFT being used in the pilot scheme across Liverpool succeeded in detecting Covid-19 in only 79.2 per cent of cases even when performed by laboratory staff. Is that really so bad? Just wait. When used by trained health professionals in the community, the detection rate fell to 73 per cent and when used by self-trained members of the public it fell to just 58 per cent. Worse, in a way, were the false positives. Overall, 0.32 per cent of people given the tests were falsely told they had the virus. If the entire population were obliged to take the tests it could mean that 200,000 – a city the size of Portsmouth – would be ordered to self-isolate when they don’t actually have the disease. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8973737/Fury-government-uses-Twitter-propaganda-tool-attack-Mails-covid-analysis.html Edited November 22, 2020 by Macnamara 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted November 23, 2020 Author Share Posted November 23, 2020 (edited) Linguistic trickery The cabal love to deploy linguistic trickery. For example anyone questioning the safety record or risk involved in any vaccination will these days be instantly slammed as an 'anti-vaxxer'. If you ever question any part of the official, state sanctioned narrative on anything then you are instantly branded a 'conspiracy theorist'. If you were to ever question the numbers involved in the holocaust then boom you'd be a 'holocaust denier'. There's no room for nuance anymore in this game of duelling narratives. Antifa hide their pro-communist politics by saying they are anti-fascists but i'm also anti-fascists as i'm against all forms of centralised government so i don't want authoritarianism of any flavour, but if they called themselves the 'pro-communist group' then people could critique their politics and say 'i disagree with you because i think communism is flawed for x, y and z reasons' but instead by calling themselves 'anti-fascist' they hide their true political position behind a faux-moral mask BLM too are marxist to their core as their founding leaders are avowed marxist occultists and yet they don't call themselves the 'communism for black people group' because then people could critique their political stance and instead hide behind the faux-moral mask of claiming to be about saving black lives which has been called into question by black conservatives who have pointed out that BLM have no concerns for all the black kids gunned down in the ghetto every week and instead only complain about police shootings as if black lives only matter in select cases! With the trans agenda there are people who are born male and say they don't identify as a male and want to transition to being a female. That sounds like a tough situation to be in to me and i think those people need the support of society but if they are saying they must be called 'women' when they are biologically not that then they are asking us to bend the meaning of language to fit their emotional state. Whats the answer to that though? Do we need a new linguistic term to create a whole new category? Would trans people accept that? I don't know the answer to that issue. The we have the issue of people of anglo-saxon descent not being able to call themselves 'english' within certain contexts because that is then not inclusive to people of other ethnicities who also grew up in the nation of england. For example lets say a person has carribean roots and loves music from the carribean and says their mums carribean cooking is the best: no one is going to call them 'racist' for saying they are afro-carribean-british or english of afro-carribean heritage, but if a person of anglo-saxon descent tries to define their heritage as 'english' then other people from the nation of england who are not of anglo-saxon heritage will say 'are you saying i'm not english?' So there is a lingusitic failure there and I don't know what the answer to that is. Its not like people of anglo-saxon descent could claim the term 'english' which of course derives from 'angle' because that then leaves other people only with the term 'british' which might not accurately define how they feel about themself for example they may feel they have no real affinity with the celtic countries and instead feel an affinity with the nation of england and therefore the term 'british' is too vague to capture how they identify. Likewise people of anglo-saxon heritage feel they have no term through which they are allowed to celebrate their heritage while everyone around them is allowed to celebrate their own. I suppose david would say the answer is to not identify with any of those labels and instead identify as infinate spirit but the point i'm trying to make about linguistic trickery or linguistic shortfalls still stands Edited November 23, 2020 by Macnamara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted November 23, 2020 Author Share Posted November 23, 2020 (edited) The Climate of Fear Does anyone doubt that we live in a climate of fear these days, in britain, where we feel like we constantly have to check what we are saying to avoid falling foul of the latest politically correct dictat in the ever shifting, morally ambiguous world of wokeism? People are afraid to question the government for fear of being branded a 'conspiracy theorist'. People are afraid to speak of sabbatean-jewish power (eg rothschilds and rockefellers) for fear of being branded an 'anti-semite'. What this climate of fear does is prevent free, open and penetrating analysis of the problems we are facing in the world and i think that is the whole point. Some people somewhere really don't want us analysing and dissecting everything because they would rather their actions and motivations remained hidden from the general public. The same is true of the term 'anti-vaxxer' which is designed to frighten people into not looking more deeply into vaccines, their contents and their efffects. All this fear is leading to a DISHONEST britain which is drowning in lies and a dishonest britain is an increasingly shaky, divided, unhappy and demoralised britain If university students self-censor out of fear, freedom of speech in wider society is doomed Frank Furedi is an author and social commentator. He is an emeritus professor of sociology at the University of Kent in Canterbury. Author of How Fear Works: The Culture of Fear in the 21st Century. Follow him on Twitter @Furedibyte 23 Nov, 2020 15:19 / Updated 2 hours ago We live in a world where more than a quarter of university students are scared to voice their views in case their opinion provokes the wrath of the campus language police. According to a survey just published by ADF International, 40 percent of students fear that their careers will be adversely affected if they speak out. The survey confirms what previous studies have noted. Last year a report by the British think-tank Policy Exchange found that only four in 10 Brexit supporters felt able to express their views in their university class. Once upon a time, universities were places where free and open debate dominated campus culture. Students held forth with the most outrageous views and everyone knew that they did not have to conform to received wisdom. That world has vanished in recent decades. Speech is heavily policed by zealous activists, whose censorious project is supported by campus administrators. As soon as students arrive on campus, they learn that any sentiment that goes against the grain of woke culture will be met by the remark, “you can’t say that!” In such circumstances far too many students opt for an easy life and hide their true opinions. The unravelling of the freedom of expression on campuses was brought home to me in February 2018. After I gave a public lecture on the subject of ‘Socialisation and Fear’ at York St John University, a young professor came up to me and said “you forgot to mention the biggest fear we face as teachers – the fear that many students have of opening their mouth.” At another public event, where I gave a lecture advocating free speech, a group of students came up to me to signal their agreement with my arguments. However, they also stated that while they were in full agreement with the principles of free speech, they found it difficult to always practice it. One of them told me “I often keep my mouth shut in a seminar to avoid hassle.” Some students openly acknowledge the fact that they self-censor and feel powerless to stand up for their views. As one second year male undergraduate explained, “people are all too ready to savage you if you use the wrong word.” Another student confided that “sooner or later someone will object that I offended them.” The practice of self-censorship is, if anything, more pervasive in the United States. A survey, published by the Harvard Crimson, the university’s student newspaper, indicated that a significant portion of this year’s graduating class were self-censoring their opinion and not debating in public. According to the report, around two-thirds of students who were surveyed had “at some point chosen not to express an opinion in an academic setting out of fear that it would offend others.” The survey indicated that 78 percent of registered Republicans said they “withheld opinions in class” compared to 59 percent of registered Democrats and 73 percent of registered Independents. In case you believe that self-censorship is not your problem because you don’t work in a university, think again. The policing of language, which began in higher education is now institutionalised throughout society. Both private and public sector organisations have adopted rules and codes of practices that ensure “people mind their language.” Consequently, self-censorship is widely practised. One reason why opinion polls so often fail to predict the outcome of an election, such as the recent American presidential election or the Brexit referendum, is because many people self-censor. It is worth noting that in the United States, the one group that was most likely to lie to pollsters and deny that they were voting for Trump in November, were white college educated males. Why? Because having been exposed to the elite narrative of what can and what cannot be said in their universities, they drew the conclusion that it was safer to keep their mouth shut about their voting intention. As an academic, I have drawn the conclusion that self-censorship is potentially more damaging to university life than the formal regulation of a campus life. The act of self-censoring means accepting the condition of being without a voice and giving up without a fight. Self-censorship also empowers zealous advocates of identity politics. Many of the foolish outbursts of intolerance on campuses occur because activists know that their behaviour is unlikely to be criticised by their peers. Most students are far from happy with the policing of language on campuses but unfortunately instead of speaking up, they prefer to keep their opinions to themselves. Until students, who are disturbed by the weaponisation of identity politics find their voice campuses will continue to be subjugated to the forces of woke intolerance. Think your friends would be interested? Share this story! https://www.rt.com/op-ed/507569-university-censorship-free-speech/ Edited November 23, 2020 by Macnamara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted November 23, 2020 Author Share Posted November 23, 2020 (edited) The woke high command now want police officers to wear rainbow epaulletes.....you could also give them red wigs and oversized clown shoes as well Lets bare in mind though that the rainbow is a freemasonic symbol tied to notions of noahide law and that the black and white chequered band around police hats known as the sillitoe tartan is the freemasonic symbol taken from the chequered floors of their lodges... UK police forces want officers to support LGBT rights by wearing rainbow epaulettes. This virtue-signalling nonsense has to stop 22 Nov, 2020 07:58 Kevin Hurley is the former Head of Counter Terrorism at the City of London Police and a reservist army officer. He has spent two tours in Iraq and one in Afghanistan addressing insurgency as both a police specialist and a soldier. One of the founding and, until today, enduring principles of the British ‘bobby’ was that he or she went about their business of protecting the public in an impartial manner. Not openly showing favouritism towards one group. A couple of days ago, I took the risk of responding to an official tweet by the South Wales Police Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender association after they proudly announced that they were “giving our officers and staff the ability to show their support by wearing trans epaulettes and LGBT+ ‘thin blue line’ patches on their uniforms.” At the peril of being labelled reactionary or worse, I tweeted back stating that it was an “appalling misjudgement”, adding: “It is not for serving police officers to visibly display support for any political or special interest group. They must be apolitical.”. I expected this to be greeted by an inevitable ‘pile on’ of virtue-signallers who think it is their right to display their sexual orientation, or those who wished to support the wearing such a badge on Her Majesty’s police uniform. One reply, from @geekcopuk, admonished me (without proper grammar): “How do you define special interest group Kevin. I don’t believe I’m expressing any political views by having an LGBT Pin on my jacket as a openly gay serving officer.” Other tweets spoke of wearing the rainbow insignia with the full support of London’s Metropolitan Police Service, and told of even Chief Constables wearing LGBT adornments on their uniforms. But what stuck me (pleasingly, I admit) was that the vast majority of replies were not just against, but openly hostile, to the idea of officers displaying such insignia. It was summed up by @LenoreNuit, who asked: “I don't understand why the public's money is being spent on this. How will it prevent crime?” https://www.rt.com/op-ed/507340-uk-police-lgbt-rainbow-epaulettes/ Edited November 23, 2020 by Macnamara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted November 24, 2020 Author Share Posted November 24, 2020 (edited) On 11/22/2020 at 2:04 AM, Macnamara said: Finally a little perspective in the mainstream media (see article below)! Its just a shame that in the same breath the daily mail push the vaccine propaganda.....folks think logically about this.....you've made an article saying essentially that the whole covid-flu-hysteria thing is being blown up out of all proportion in order to justify the lockdowns so if the threat is not real (on the scale they claim it is) and the lockdown is not therefore justified then ask yourselves why they would need to uphold the lie in order to impose a lockdown? So the purpose of the lockdown IS to bully the population into this vaccine which according to your own article the public don't need because the threat has been blown up out of all proportion! So if the vaccine isn't needed then why is it still going ahead and why are you still promoting it? if the lockdown is unjustified then so is the vaccine so muster your journalistic integrity and report it! What they DON'T tell you about Covid: Fewer beds taken up than last year, deaths a fraction of the grim forecasts, 95% of fatalities had underlying causes... and how the facts can be twisted to strike fear in our hearts https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8973737/Fury-government-uses-Twitter-propaganda-tool-attack-Mails-covid-analysis.html follow up to this exchange between the daily mail and the government when the mail called out the governments BULLSHIT....well done to the mail....now you need to build on this while you have momentum and the attention of academia and the public.... Department of Health in climbdown after online swipe at The Mail's analysis of Covid-19 facts and figures The Mail said Government predictions on potential fatalities were inaccurate Whitehall spin doctors used official Twitter account to try to rubbish the report The department failed to identify a single error in the figures and data we used By David Churchill For The Daily Mail Published: 00:47, 23 November 2020 | Updated: 11:55, 24 November 2020 The Health Department was forced into a humiliating climbdown yesterday after accusing the Mail of ‘misleading’ readers Failing to provide any detailed rebuttal, the post said: ‘This article is misleading. This is a global pandemic – national restrictions have been introduced to keep people safe and save lives.’ But the tweet was deleted yesterday afternoon amid a growing backlash among MPs and academics who lined up to back the Mail. They hailed our analysis of the facts and accused officials of trying to stifle free speech. After the tweet was removed, the department failed to identify a single error in the figures and data. Former minister Steve Baker, one of more than 30 Tory rebels who voted against a second lockdown, said: ‘It’s absolutely wrong for the Department of Health to attack the Mail when they accept the data. ‘The truth is, as anyone can see, scientists disagree so it’s right that journalists ask the questions. ‘Fact checking should be about facts, not propagandising for one interpretation of uncertain information. I couldn’t be more concerned about the repeated failures of modelling we’ve experienced. ‘Whether it’s been death projections or NHS capacity, the wheels have fallen off terrifying charts repeatedly. It’s no good afterwards for scientists and ministers to say these models don’t matter. They do because they determine the course of all our lives.’ Another of the Tory lockdown rebels, former minister David Jones, said: ‘The figures and facts the Mail put forward are clearly matters that deserve a proper and considered response, rather than a dismissive suggestion that you’re misleading people. It seems to me to be a valuable public service. There’s a massive amount of social and economic damage being caused to the country and many of us are concerned the justification for causing that damage is not there.’ Carl Heneghan, professor of evidence-based medicine at the University of Oxford, said: ‘The Mail article brought a number of datasets which are difficult to interpret into one place. ‘It also put the data into context, which has been lacking throughout this pandemic, and it’s incredibly important. I read it, and I was like, “This is really helpful,” particularly on the context of how this compares to previous years and the lower limit and upper limit of deaths. ‘The Press is there to inform the public and this notion of, in effect, censorship through social media shouldn’t be coming from over-reaching state or Government organisations.’ Professor Robert Dingwall, of Nottingham Trent University, sits on Government advisory panels but also broke ranks. He said: ‘What the Mail has done is presented a reasonable interpretation of the data and you would expect the department to respond with an equally reasonable rebuttal. A good deal of the policy-making we’ve seen has been based on the most extreme possibilities rather than on what we might reasonably expect.’ It is understood that Damon Poole, Health Secretary Matt Hancock’s special adviser for media matters, signs off most tweets. He is said to have been working on Saturday, but the department refused to comment on who had the final say on green-lighting the post. Earlier this month, ministers and their scientific advisers were criticised by the official watchdog, the UK Statistics Authority (UKSA), over the way data was used to justify a second national lockdown. One graph claimed deaths could exceed 4,000 a day, substantially more than the highest daily record of 1,224 in April. But it later emerged the projection was out of date. UKSA accused ministers of failing to provide ‘transparent information’ and ‘confusing’ the public. Tory MP Peter Bone said: ‘My issue with the Government is that it appears to have decided on the policy and then picked statistics that support that outcome. Well done to the Mail for trying to balance up the information provided.’ A Government spokesman said: ‘It is inaccurate to suggest any data has been deliberately misrepresented. The projections cited were based on what would happen if no further restrictions were put in place and did not take into account the robust action the Government has taken to save lives since then.’ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8976195/Department-Health-climbdown-online-swipe-analysis-Covid-19-facts-figures.html Edited November 24, 2020 by Macnamara 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rideforever Posted November 24, 2020 Share Posted November 24, 2020 The Government has misrepresented everything, they are destroying the country for no reason whatsoever. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted November 24, 2020 Author Share Posted November 24, 2020 (edited) 12 minutes ago, rideforever said: The Government has misrepresented everything, they are destroying the country for no reason whatsoever. So along with the tens of thousands of people protesting in the streets up and down the country and the 35,000 doctors and scientists who have signed the great barrington declaration criticising the governments lockdown measures we now have medical journals like the British Medical Journal questioning the safety and efficacy of the experimental mRNA covid vaccine testing processes and we have the mainstream media destroying the governments stats while the academia is also offering counter points to the governments false narratives and tory MP's are rebelling So it looks like we all agree: there is a small cadre of malcontents holding onto the tiller of the good ship britain and they are driving us against the rocks So the question is friends: 'how do we lever those delegitimised brigands out of the corridors of power?' Perhaps david is right that it will need millions of us in the streets so that we become undeniable to the british police as the voice of the people which in turn would then encourage them to join us or else face the stark choice of deliberately and in full conscience going against the british general public. We need to drive through a vote of no confidence on the cabal at the centre of government and put our ship back on the straight and narrow Edited November 24, 2020 by Macnamara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rideforever Posted November 24, 2020 Share Posted November 24, 2020 @Macnamara Maybe Farage can do something, but the belief system of science is strong magic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted November 25, 2020 Author Share Posted November 25, 2020 SERCO, crown privateers Who’s Behind The 5G Cull Of Humanity? Posted on 03/19/2019 By Dean Henderson In 1999, HP scientist Richard P. Walker was granted a patent for what would become known as the internet of everything, now better known as 5G. Walker and the rest of his Silicon Valley colleagues had been fed military technology by Lockheed Martin and IBM. HP spun off Agilent Technologies that same year as the vehicle through which the Walker patent would come to fruition. All ensuing patents pertaining to 5G would be mysteriously absorbed by Agilent, whether in the areas of surveillance, cybernetics, genetic engineering, human microchipping, or “wet works”. The corporation pushing Walker’s Agilent patent forward is SERCO, a powerful British company close to Lockheed Martin, GE and BAE. The first and last are the two biggest defense contractors in the world. All four are part of Crown Agents USA Inc. The golden share in SERCO was historically controlled through British Nuclear Fuels (BNFL) by Queen Elizabeth II. In 2009 BNFL was shut down after spinning off its Westinghouse subsidiary. They had acquired Westinghouse in 1999, four years after Westinghouse bought CBS. BNFL’s nuclear plants had been privatized in 1996 and were taken over by British Energy. The same year BNFL shut down, British Energy was taken over by Electricite de France. In 2000, Serco and Lockheed Martin took control of the UK’s Aldermaster weapons site. They also control two-thirds of the British Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE). The other third was owned by BNFL. During the past decade, AWE began exporting stolen US-enriched uranium from a Eunice, NM facility through its Urenco subsidiary. Urenco Executive Chairman Stephen Billingham came from British Energy. They were aided in this effort by the Highland Group, whose associates include the Clintons and Robert Mueller. SERCO controls immigration and owns a pathology lab in the UK and runs detention centers, prisons and hospitals in Australia and New Zealand. But the bulk of its income comes from no-bid US government contracts granted to it by members of Senior Executive Services (SES). SES consists of government insiders who, unlike a typical civil servant, cannot be fired after one year of service. President Obama appointed 8,000 of them. SES members are in fact British Crown Agents who feed US government contracts, innovations, resources and sensitive information to their Crown bosses. SERCO receives $15-20 billion per year in US government contracts. It runs 63 air traffic control towers, manages Obama Care, runs city parking meters and lots as well as buses and trains, overseas Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC) loans, and handles USAID shipments. But 75% of SERCO’s contracts are with the Department of Defense. With offices in the Bank of England-controlled offshore dirty money banking centers of Guernsey, Jersey and the Cayman Islands, SERCO runs “security” for all branches of the US military and our intelligence services. SERCO is deeply involved in the US Space Program through Aerospace Corporation, which plans to deploy 24,000 new 5G-enabling satellites via Elon Musk’s SpaceX and Amazon’s OneWeb in the next year. SERCO also holds contracts with Bill Gates’ Millenium Foundation involving the sterilization of Africans and Indians through vaccinations. Founded in 1929, SERCO came out of RCA, another Crown Agent which morphed mostly into GE. RCA is best known for its consumer electronics but its main business had been military radar and sonar equipment. It is this same technology which is now being deployed as 5G. In my book Big Oil & Their Bankers…, I pinpoint RCA as a key player in the Crown assassination of President John F. Kennedy. During the early 1960’s, RCA developed the UK Ballistic Missile Early Warning System. During the 1980’s they were awarded the contract to support the new European Space Agency and began maintaining London’s street lights. In 1987, with much of RCA absorbed into GE, what remained became SERCO. During the 1990’s SERCO took its “services” international, focusing on the Five Eyes Alliance countries of the UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the US. The middle three countries are part of the Commonwealth and thus controlled directly by the British Crown. SERCO also began operating in the Crown’s puppet GCC monarchies in the Middle East, where it runs all air traffic control operations. It also gained control of Iraq’s Civil Aviation Authority. This makes Crown drugs, arms, oil and human smuggling in and out of that region a breeze. SERCO provides “technical support” for CERN’s particle accelerator, manages transport services at North District Hospital in Hong Kong (another major drug trafficking center), and provides “support” for military bases in the Five Eyes nations. It manages the UK National Physics Laboratory and trains soldiers in the US and Germany. SERCO also dominates contracts from US Homeland Security and is in charge of FEMA Region 9, which includes Alaska, Hawaii and the US West Coast, which has recently been experiencing a slew of not-so-natural disasters. SERCO began providing IT support for European Parliament in 2014, began training US firefighters in Afghanistan in 2016 and began operating European Meteorological Satellites in 2017. SERCO’s specialty is in handling sensitive cyber-data, including criminal records, driver’s license records, vaccination records, DNA databases, and military records and communications. This puts them in a position to completely control the Five Eyes governments and their citizens. But SERCO’s most important GCHQ infiltration came in 2015 when it was awarded the patent classification contract in the US, essentially commandeering the US Patent Office. In this capacity they are able to steer and manage the Walker 5G patent in the Crown’s desired direction. That direction, according to their own documents, is a 70% reduction in the UK population by 2025, with similar reductions in store around the world. SERCO is run by two British Knights Hospitalier. Sir Roy Gardner is Serco Chairman who handles, according to SERCO’s own website, “relations with the City (of London) and major stakeholders (Queen Elizabeth II)”. CEO Rupert Soames is Winston Churchill’s grandson. In 2010, he was awarded Officer of the Order of the British Empire (which, of course, does not exist). Both came from Crown Agent GE, which manufactures the smart meters and LED lighting being rolled out ahead of 5G. Monsanto (now part of Nazi IG Farben descendant Bayer), is also closely held by the Crown, which explains why it continues to poison humanity with Roundup. Many people are now identifying the multiple threats to humanity, from chemtrails to fluoridation to vaccines to glyphosphates to 5G. This awareness has grown to a point where the Establishment is now banning such information from the DARPAnet. A few others have identified these attacks as a coordinated attempt to depopulate 90% of humanity. But the next task at hand in this criminal investigation is the most important one and needs to become our focus. We must identify the perps. For decades the ruling Illuminati banker oligarchy have expressed their obsession with overpopulation. Queen Elizabeth’s own husband Prince Philip has expressed his desire to reincarnate as a parasite so he can destroy humanity. But it appears the Crown isn’t waiting for that eventuality. In their accelerating program towards the culling of billions of human beings from this planet, SERCO is the lynch pin which implicates the Crown as perpetrator of this well-planned genocide. 5G is key to their plan and must be stopped. Anyone shielding or enabling these criminals is a traitor to their country. All aware people must shout out this indictment to family, friends, neighbors and the proper law enforcement agencies. It’s time to focus all our energy on the enemy and get these Luciferian sociopaths locked up before it’s too late. Dean Henderson is the author of five books: Big Oil & Their Bankers in the Persian Gulf: Four Horsemen, Eight Families & Their Global Intelligence, Narcotics & Terror Network, The Grateful Unrich: Revolution in 50 Countries, Stickin’ it to the Matrix, The Federal Reserve Cartel & Illuminati Agenda 21: The Luciferian Plan to Destroy Creation. https://hendersonlefthook.wordpress....l-of-humanity/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted November 25, 2020 Author Share Posted November 25, 2020 The Freedom Pass So here's how this con is going to work.... The conspirators will be able to avoid vaccines and lockdown measures by being granted a 'freedom pass' which can allow them free movement and access to goods and services because the concept, as explained in the newspaper piece below, is that if a person is tested twice in a week and is found to be negative for covid then they can be granted a freedom pass. This is how the cabal will allow their freemasonic minions off the hook. So lets take matt hancock for example. Let's say you are a journalist and you want to find out if matt hancock has been granted a freedom pass. In reality they will likely keep that kind of information confidential, but lets say hypothetically speaking that you are able to get your hands on that information and you find out that matt hancock has indeed been granted a freedom pass and is unaffected by lockdown measures. So now you want to find out if he was actually tested or not or if freedom passes are just handed around among insiders as a matter of course. So you decide to question the doctor who tested him and likely that information would be confidential but lets say that somehow you are able to find out the name of a doctor and lets say you contact them. That doctor only needs to be a willing conspirator like a doctor fauci type and they will of course lie to your face and say ''yes i tested matt hancock twice and he was negative both times so i have signed off his freedom pass'' The point being that how will you ever know if people are really being tested or if freedom passes are basically just given out to all the people who know that this is a giant scam but who are all playing a role within it? The answer is that you won't Britons who test negative for Covid twice in a week are set to receive a 'freedom pass' under government scheme that will allow them to live a normal life It is hoped the scheme could allow Britons to go back to a relatively normal life To earn a freedom pass people will need to get a negative test twice a week Pass will allow you to mix with friends and family without distancing or masks By Danyal Hussain For Mailonline Published: 08:17, 22 November 2020 | Updated: 08:21, 22 November 2020 Britons are set to be given Covid 'freedom passes' as long as they test negative for the virus twice in a week, it has been suggested. The details of the scheme are still being ironed out by officials in Whitehall, who hope it will allow the country to get back to normal next year. To earn the freedom pass, people will need to be tested regularly and, provided the results come back negative, they will then be given a letter, card or document they can show to people as they move around. The certificate would be stored on a phone, according to sources, and would allow people to live a relatively normal life until the government's vaccination programme gets up to the speed. It would even allow Britons to get away without wearing a mask, it is thought, and visit family and friends without the need to socially distance. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8974617/Britons-test-negative-Covid-twice-week-set-receive-freedom-pass.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted November 26, 2020 Author Share Posted November 26, 2020 Microwave beam-directing drones to fly around above our heads...when do we get to vote on this? Revolutionary airborne antenna system could bring 5G to the world By Jon Mundy 5 November 2020 Technology consultancy firm Cambridge Consultants has announced an ambitious collaboration with UK startup Stratospheric Platforms Limited to create an airborne wireless 5G antenna system. Following a successful proof of concept, Cambridge Consultants is claiming that its system will provide affordable 5G connectivity via a fleet of autonomous aircraft flying at an altitude of 20,000 meters for more than a week. These aircraft would operate at a fraction of the cost of traditional terrestrial network infrastructure, and their zero-emission hydrogen power systems will ensure minimal environmental impact. Just a single High-Altitude Platform (HAP) can cover an area of 140km in diameter, and it’s claimed that a fleet of 60 HAPs could cover the entire UK with 5G network connectivity. What’s more, the fleet would provide even geographic coverage and peak 5G speeds in excess of 100 Gbps. Extreme beamforming Each airborne antenna can produce 480 steerable beams, which can be precisely aimed to cover specific areas such as roads, railway lines, and shipping lanes. This level of fine control extends to the point where the HAP signal can follow mobile users in trains and autonomous vehicles, and even stop at national borders. SPL Chief Executive Officer Richard Deakin said: “It was essential that we overcame significant technical challenges in the design of the antenna to enable us to deliver massive data rates in a unique environment where power was limited, where weight was critical and where cooling in the thin, stratospheric air was difficult.” SPL already completed a successful test trial of the HAP system in September 2020, and the first commercial rollout is expected to take place in Germany in 2024. However, it’s the developing world that could stand to benefit most from this new 5G venture. The HAP system’s low cost and inherently mobile nature could provide a viable means to provide 5G internet access to remote rural areas around the world. https://5g.co.uk/news/revolutionary-airborne-antenna-system-5g/5446/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted November 30, 2020 Author Share Posted November 30, 2020 (edited) Participant in India’s AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine trial sues after experiencing ‘severe adverse effect’ 29 Nov, 2020 10:13 An Indian man who helped test a coronavirus jab based on AstraZeneca’s candidate vaccine has filed suit, claiming that he suffered extreme side effects during his participation in the trial. The plaintiff, identified in media reports as a 40-year-old man from Chennai, is suing the Pune-based Serum Institute of India (SII) for Rs 5 crore ($676,000 USD). The individual alleges that he suffered serious neurological damage after taking part in the phase three trial of Covishield, the SII’s version of the Covid-19 jab being developed by AstraZeneca and the University of Oxford. The man was purportedly told that the vaccine was safe and chose to participate in the program in “the spirit of public service.” https://www.rt.com/news/508134-india-covishield-vaccine-lawsuit/ A closer look at U.S. deaths due to COVID-19 By YANNI GU | November 22, 2020 According to new data, the U.S. currently ranks first in total COVID-19 cases, new cases per day and deaths. Genevieve Briand, assistant program director of the Applied Economics master’s degree program at Hopkins, critically analyzed the effect of COVID-19 on U.S. deaths using data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in her webinar titled “COVID-19 Deaths: A Look at U.S. Data.” From mid-March to mid-September, U.S. total deaths have reached 1.7 million, of which 200,000, or 12% of total deaths, are COVID-19-related. Instead of looking directly at COVID-19 deaths, Briand focused on total deaths per age group and per cause of death in the U.S. and used this information to shed light on the effects of COVID-19. She explained that the significance of COVID-19 on U.S. deaths can be fully understood only through comparison to the number of total deaths in the United States. After retrieving data on the CDC website, Briand compiled a graph representing percentages of total deaths per age category from early February to early September, which includes the period from before COVID-19 was detected in the U.S. to after infection rates soared. Surprisingly, the deaths of older people stayed the same before and after COVID-19. Since COVID-19 mainly affects the elderly, experts expected an increase in the percentage of deaths in older age groups. However, this increase is not seen from the CDC data. In fact, the percentages of deaths among all age groups remain relatively the same. “The reason we have a higher number of reported COVID-19 deaths among older individuals than younger individuals is simply because every day in the U.S. older individuals die in higher numbers than younger individuals,” Briand said. Briand also noted that 50,000 to 70,000 deaths are seen both before and after COVID-19, indicating that this number of deaths was normal long before COVID-19 emerged. Therefore, according to Briand, not only has COVID-19 had no effect on the percentage of deaths of older people, but it has also not increased the total number of deaths. These data analyses suggest that in contrast to most people’s assumptions, the number of deaths by COVID-19 is not alarming. In fact, it has relatively no effect on deaths in the United States. https://web.archive.org/web/20201126223119/https://www.jhunewsletter.com/article/2020/11/a-closer-look-at-u-s-deaths-due-to-covid-19 Edited November 30, 2020 by Macnamara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted November 30, 2020 Author Share Posted November 30, 2020 (edited) NYC Pub Declares Itself “Autonomous Zone” After Government Tries To Shut It Down November 29, 2020 https://www.activistpost.com/2020/11/nyc-pub-declares-itself-autonomous-zone-after-government-tries-to-shut-it-down.html Edited November 30, 2020 by Macnamara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted November 30, 2020 Author Share Posted November 30, 2020 Many, many studies on vaccines available as a resource for truthers here. Get in about it and share them round! View the Evidence: 1340 Abstracts with Vaccination: All Research https://www.greenmedinfo.com/anti-therapeutic-action/vaccination-all Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted December 3, 2020 Author Share Posted December 3, 2020 Disruption to cell membrane affecting hemostasis? There are reports of issues occurring with people suffering from coagulation of the blood which is being labelled 'covid'. Covid is acute respiratory distress which the official narrative is blaming on a novel virus they have named sars cov 2. My hypothesis is that we aren't dealing with a novel virus however and are instead dealing with an abnormal physiologic condition caused by exposure to harmful environmental factors such as microwave radiation from 5G and/or viral interference from flu vaccinations. Non-localised thickening of the blood could be caused by some process in the body either being switched on or being switched off by that environmental factor. If Thrombin is the sole relevant initiator of coagulation then could there be some non localised injury that is affecting the ability of cells to control the nature of their membrane surface which may then be affecting thrombin production? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.jpg.8081a54a3b74a5d1823dfac966666137.jpg)
.jpg.594f0ef23288ec5ab04539b2f8a8dbd4.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.