Macnamara Posted October 13, 2020 Author Share Posted October 13, 2020 Amazing that so many authoritarian-lefties claim they are fighting for 'social justice' and yet they support the draconian measures on covid as those measures are going to cause mass poverty around the world. Why would people say 'black lives matter' whilst supporting policies that will trash the wealth and health of millions of africans????? Clearly these polices being discussed by the elites in Davos and by royals and state-capitalist chiefs are not BY THE PEOPLE they are by the elites and as they destroy the wealth and businesses and mental health of millions they are clearly not FOR THE PEOPLE either and yet so many 'progressives' at street level blindly bang the drum for these elitist policies Who funds the riotous American left & why? The globalist billionaire class, which uses it to build corporate socialism Michael Rectenwald is an author of ten books, including the most recent, Beyond Woke. He was Professor of Liberal Arts at NYU from 2008 through 2019. Follow him on Twitter @TheAntiPCProf 12 Oct, 2020 15:43 Why do giant corporations and billionaires fund Black Lives Matter and Antifa, both avowed socialist groups? And why do the leftists accept their aid? They both want a kind of socialism, but only one of them could get their way. If you’re at all familiar with the corporate and billionaire funding sources behind Black Lives Matter and Antifa and the socialist commitments of these groups and their leaders, you’ve probably wondered why the ‘capitalist class’ would support a movement whose doctrine is apparently antithetical to their own interests. Aren’t these funders capitalists after all, and don’t capitalists naturally oppose socialism? And why do American leftists dance like marionettes attached to strings pulled by globalist billionaires? Don’t they understand that they’re actually serving the masters they claim to oppose? The answer is not so simple as the World Socialist Website suggests: “The aims of the Black Lives Matter movement are aligned with those of Wall Street and the US government.” Nor is the answer that BLM/Antifa have merely ‘sold out’ to capitalists. Nor is the donor class making a mistake, or merely interested in racial equality. The answer is that the corporate and billionaire elites prefer a kind of socialism – namely, ‘corporate socialism’. Corporate socialism And what is corporate socialism? Corporate socialism is not merely government bailouts for corporations. It is a two-tiered system of ‘actually-existing socialism’ on the ground, paralleled by a set of corporate monopolies on top. (‘Actually-existing socialism’ is a pejorative term used mostly by dissidents in socialist countries to refer to what life was really like under socialism, rather than in the perfidious books of Marx and his epigones.) Wealth for the few, ‘economic equality’ under reduced conditions for the many – corporate socialism is a form of neo-feudalism. In Wall Street and FDR, historian Anthony C Sutton described corporate socialism, as developed in the 19thth century, and distinguished it from state socialism, as follows: “[The] robber baron schema is also, under different labels, the socialist plan. The difference between a corporate state monopoly and a socialist state monopoly is essentially only the identity of the group controlling the power structure. The essence of socialism is monopoly control by the state using hired planners and academic sponges. On the other hand, Rockefeller, Morgan, and their corporate friends aimed to acquire and control their monopoly and to maximize its profits through influence in the state political apparatus; this, while it still needs hired planners and academic sponges, is a discreet and far more subtle process than outright state ownership under socialism…We call this phenomenon of corporate legal monopoly – market control acquired by using political influence – by the name of corporate socialism.” What Sutton calls corporate socialism might otherwise be called ‘corporate-run socialism’ or ‘socialist capitalism’. For both state socialists and corporate socialists, the free market is the enemy. They both seek to eliminate it. The free market threatens the system of state control in the case of state socialism. In the case of corporate socialism, the free market represents an impediment to the unhampered accumulation of wealth. The corporate socialists do not mean to eliminate profit. Quite to the contrary, they mean to increase it and keep it all to themselves. To ensure and appreciate profits to the fullest, corporate socialists seek to eliminate competition and the free market. As Sutton wrote, for the 19th-century corporate socialists: “The only sure road to the acquisition of massive wealth was monopoly: drive out your competitors, reduce competition, eliminate laissez-faire, and above all get state protection for your industry through compliant politicians and government regulation.” The difference between state socialism and corporate-run socialism, then, is merely that a different set of monopolists are in control. Under state socialism, the monopoly is held by the state. Under corporate socialism, the monopolists are giant corporations. But both political economies are characterized by monopoly. And both systems use socialist-communist ideology – or the recent incarnations, ‘social justice’ or ‘woke’ ideology – to advance their agendas. For corporate socialists, corporate monopoly is the desired end and socialist ideology is among the means. Socialist ideology works to the benefit of corporate socialists because it demonizes competition and the free market in an effort to eliminate them. This explains why capitalist corporations like Amazon and mega-wealthy capitalist donors like George Soros and Tom Steyer actually fund organizations with explicitly socialist agendas, like Black Lives Matter, and why Google, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, and other internet giants apparently favor leftist and even socialist over ‘rightwing’ content and users. Corporate socialism, the coronavirus lockdowns, and the riots We can see the corporate socialist plan in action with the Covid-19 lockdowns and the Black Lives Matter/Antifa riots. The draconian lockdown measures employed by Democratic governors and mayors and the destruction perpetrated by the rioters are doing the work that corporate socialists want done. Is it any wonder that corporate elites favor leftist politics? In addition to destabilizing the nation state, leftist politics are helping to destroy small businesses, thus eliminating competitors. As the Foundation for Economic Education (FEE) points out, the lockdowns and riots have combined to level a one-two punch that is knocking out millions of small businesses – “the backbone of the American economy”– all across America. FEE reported that “…7.5 million small businesses in America are at risk of closing their doors for good. A more recent survey showed that even with federal loans, close to half of all small business owners say they’ll have to shut down for good. The toll has already been severe. In New York alone, stay-at-home orders have forced the permanent closure of more than 100,000 small businesses.” Moreover, minority-owned businesses are the most at-risk. Even New York Governor Andrew Cuomo agrees: “They are 90 percent of New York's businesses and they're facing the toughest challenges.” Meanwhile, as FEE also notes, there is no evidence that the lockdowns have done anything to slow the spread of the virus. Likewise, there is no evidence that Black Lives Matter has done anything to help black lives. If anything, the riotous and murderous campaign of Black Lives Matter and Antifa have proven that black lives do not matter to Black Lives Matter. In addition to murdering black people, the Black Lives Matter and Antifa protest riots have done enormous damage to black businesses and neighborhoods, and thus, to black lives. As small businesses have been crushed by the combination of draconian lockdowns and riotous lunacy, corporate giants like Amazon have thrived like never before. The two developments ‘just so happen’ to move us closer to corporate-run socialism. As BBC News noted, at least three of the tech giants – Amazon, Apple, and Facebook – have appreciated massive gains during the lockdowns, gains which were no doubt abetted by riots that cost one to two billion in property damages. During the three months ending with June, Amazon’s “quarterly profit of $5.2bn (£4bn) was the biggest since the company's start in 1994 and came despite heavy spending on protective gear and other measures due to the virus.” Amazon’s sales rose by 40 percent in the three months ending in June. As reported by TechCrunch, Facebook and its WhatsApp and Instagram platforms saw a 15 percent rise in users, which brought revenues to a grand total of $17.74 billion in the first quarter. Facebook’s total users climbed to three billion internet users in March, or two-thirds of the world’s internet users, a record. Apple’s revenues soared during the same period, with quarterly earnings rising 11 percent year-on-year to $59.7 billion. “Walmart, the country's largest grocer, said profits rose four percent, to $3.99 billion,” during the first quarter of 2020, as reported by the Washington Post. These same corporations are also major supporters of Black Lives Matter and affiliated groups. As CNET reported, “Google has committed $12 million, while both Facebook and Amazon are donating $10 million to various groups that fight against racial injustice. Apple is pledging a whopping $100 million for a new Racial Equity and Justice Initiative that will ‘challenge the systemic barriers to opportunity and dignity that exist for communities of color, and particularly for the black community’ according to Apple CEO Tim Cook.” Is it just a coincidence that the number of small businesses have been nearly cut in half by the Covid-19 lockdowns and the Black Lives Matter/Antifa riots, while the corporate giants have consolidated their grip on the economy, as well as their power over individual expression on the internet and beyond? Or, do the lockdowns and the riots prove that corporate socialism is afoot? And is “woke capitalism” merely a concerted PR campaign for appeasing activists and black people in order to curry favor and avoid cancel culture? Or, does woke capitalism actually express globalist, corporate socialist interests? What would a politics that serves such interests look like? Corporate socialism and contemporary leftism To benefit the globalist agenda of corporate socialists, those of monopolies or near monopolies, a political creed would likely promote the free movement of labor across national borders and thus would be internationalist rather than nationalist. The global corporate monopolies or would-be monopolies would likely benefit from the creation of utterly new identity types for new niche markets, and thus would welcome and encourage gender pluralism, transgenderism and other identity morphisms. The disruption of stable gender identity categories erodes and contributes to the dismantling of the family, or the last bastion of influence between the masses and corporate power. Ultimately, the global capitalist corporation would benefit from a singular globalized governmental monopoly with one set of laws, and thus would promote a borderless internationalism under a global government, preferably under their complete control, otherwise known as globalism. And the corporate socialists would benefit from the elimination of small businesses. How does this line up with contemporary leftism? It has the same objectives. Leftism encourages unfettered immigration. It encourages gender pluralism and transgenderism and openly calls for the dissolution of the family. It seeks to destroy historical memory, inherited culture, Christianity, and the nation state. It aims at a one-world monopoly of government. And it despises small business and free enterprise. Thus, leftist politics align perfectly with the globalist interests of monopolistic corporations. And corporate socialists are the beneficiaries of their ‘activism’. Think your friends would be interested? Share this story! The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT. https://www.rt.com/op-ed/503267-american-left-corporate-socialism/ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted October 13, 2020 Author Share Posted October 13, 2020 (edited) The hegelian dialectic Prof Sutton writes about how strange it is on the surface that the wall street bankers (they were sabbatean-frankists as JP Morgan was really just an agent of the rothschilds and the rockefellers are most certainly part of that clique) would fund the marxist bolsheviks and then go on to fund the nationalist socialist nazis and then FDR in the USA but he makes the point that they are all collectivist and will therefore all act to the detriment of individual freedom He also speculates that this strange funding of both sides could be part of a hegelian dialectic where from the created conflict a new third option is synthesised. Here's what he said in his book 'Wall street and the Bolshevik Revolution': ''What is the ultimate purpose of these pincer tactics? Can they be related to the marxist axiom: thesis versus antithesis yields synthesis? It is a puzzle why the marxist movement would attack capitalism head-on if its objective was a Communist world and if it truly it accepted the dialectic. If the object is a communist world- that is, if communism is the desired synthesis-and capitalism is the thesis, then something apart from capitalism or communism has to be the antithesis. Could therefore capitalism be the thesis and communism the antithesis, with the objective of the revolutionary groups and their backers being a synthesizing of these two systems into some world system yet undescribed?'' Sutton wrote that back in 1974 and now with the benefit of time we are able to answer that question for sutton. He is indeed 100% correct and that out of this ongoing, manufactured war between state-capitalism and state-socialism we are seeing a third system arise in the background which is to say: TECHNOCRACY To understand how these sabbateans behind the bolsheviks and the rise of the nazis could pull this off james corbett has created two documentaries which are some of the best I've encountered during many years of looking into the conspiracy: ''How big oil conquered the world'' and ''why big oil conquered the world'', both available on youtube and bitchute. Here is the second of the two which looks at the technocracy movement: Edited October 13, 2020 by Macnamara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted October 13, 2020 Author Share Posted October 13, 2020 The duping of the millenial generation Recent polls have shown that many millenials favour socialism over capitalism. When i was younger i considered myself a 'socialist' however over time i realised a few things. First of all i realised that what we have now is not actually capitalism because under capitalism the banks would not have been bailed out by the state after the 2008 credit crunch. Instead what we have is an alliance between the state and the capitalist fat cats. This relationship created the 'federal reserve' bank which is really just a cartel of private banks that partnered with the state. What we have today is really big cartels of corporations for example: big pharma, big agra, central banking, big oil and weapons manufacturers. Those cartels are monopolists who hate real competition. What i then went on to learn was that those same monopoly capitalists who were behind all these big cartels were in fact also the people behind state-socialism because it allowed them CENTRALISED control over the population and resources without the need of a middle man of 'democracy'. This is in fact the lesson orwell was trying to give in his book 'animal farm' where the pigs lead a revolution that throws the humans off the farm. The pigs then set themselves up in the farmhouse and get the other animals to do all the work. When the animals complain that they are doing all the work while the pigs sit in the farmhouse enjoying all the food and comforts the pigs say that ''all are equal but some are more equal than others'' In our actual world the pigs are the neoliberal monopoly capitalists who are behind 'social democracy' which is really marxism by reform instead of revolution. Their ultimate aim is to create an entirely centralised system of control through which they can control the resources and people while using the apparatus of the state to enforce their will They have settled on the 'technocracy' as the best form of government through which this can be achieved because the technocracy controls people through the constant monitoring of their energy useage right down to the energy of their toothbrush! This is achieved by creating a 'smart' grid of interconnected appliances that all communicate to the technocrats through the 'cloud' enabling them to monitor and control everyones energy output. In order to get the public to accept this new system the elites have to convince the public that they are facing a 'climate emergency' that requires all CO2 production to be centrally controlled by the elites. In order to get people to buy that the elites have to convince everyone that climate change is caused by manmade CO2. The cartels monopoly capitalism allows the elites to hoover up all the wealth creating an impoverished society who begin to lose faith in the system. The millenials who hit adulthood in the imposed 'austerity' that came in the wake of the 2008 credit crunch then begin to feel cheated of the quality of life enjoyed by their parents generation. The elites who want to transition them to a state-socialist technocracy then tell the young that the problem is a 'crisis of capitalism' and that it has destroyed the climate causing a 'climate emergency' which can only be solved through the imposition of state-socialism which in reality will mean the centralisation of power into the hands of the elites who will be able to micro-manage everyone through the technocratic state Anyone who disagree will be frozen out of the technocracy and will be branded a heretic for not believing manmade CO2 narratives or in the ultimate truth of state-socialism The whole capitalism v's communism was always a controlled hegelian dialectic aimed at moving society towards a third way: state-socialist TECHNOCRACY under the totalitarian control of the neoliberal elites behind the mega-corporations. The millenials are now demoralised and have lost faith in the cartels monopoly form of capitalism and are ready to embace the cartels next trick: technocracy. Once they have allowed this the trap is sprung and society will be imprisoned within a prison without bars that is already being trialed in china and by that point it will be too late to complain because dissent will not be tolerated 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted October 14, 2020 Author Share Posted October 14, 2020 On 10/6/2020 at 10:45 PM, Macnamara said: Human 2.0 As the doctor in the second clip explains the Moderna vaccine used genetically modified RNA through a process called TRANSFECTION which is the same process used to make genetically modified organisms. This means the vaccine could change your genome forever. The vaccine also uses HYDROGEL nanotechnology which can receive and transmit which means that your body will be passing information about what you are doing to the technocrats whilst they can also send information to your body for example to mould your mood. The people behind TRANSFECTION technology have been exploring GENE EXTINCTION which is the process of destroying targeted species for example mosquitos. The vaccine also contains a bioluminescent marker called LUCIFERASE which shows up under a scan at the vaccine entry point in your body to show the authorities that you have had the vaccine Looks like they have got that video.....they are going to shut down all speech that questions the Covid vaccines and the contents of the vaccines...we are running out of time YouTube bans videos claiming a coronavirus vaccine will KILL recipients or be used to implant people with surveillance microchips YouTube already bans content with 'medical unsubstantiated' claims about virus Ir will now also take down content that promotes misinformation about a vaccine This includes conspiracy theories stating the vaccine will be used to kill people and inject recipients with a secret surveillance microchip By Reuters and Joe Pinkstone For Mailonline Published: 14:04, 14 October 2020 | Updated: 22:17, 14 October 2020 YouTube has buckled to growing pressure to clamp down further on misinformation on the video-sharing platform pertaining to the coronavirus. In an announcement today the Google-owned site said content that 'promotes misinformation' about COVID-19 vaccines will be removed. YouTube defines misinformation in this instance as anything which contradicts guidance from local health authorities or the World Health Organization. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-8839495/YouTube-bans-coronavirus-vaccine-misinformation.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted October 15, 2020 Author Share Posted October 15, 2020 No need for lockdowns or mandatory vaccines: Prof. Dolores J. Cahill - Speech in Dublin Link to watch the speech: https://www.liveleak.com/view?t=aVpMR_1602769696 The following text was taken off the liveleak page linked above: Prof. Dolores J. Cahill, Professor of Translational Science at UCD School of Medicine, University College Dublin - Epidemiologist, Immunologist, Molecular Biologist. Here is a list of her Credentials Prof. Dr Dolores Cahill has over 25 years expertise in high-throughput protein array, antibody array, proteomics technology development, automation and their biomedical applications, including in biomarker discovery, diagnostics and personalised medicine. She is Professor of Translational Science, School of Medicine and at the Conway Institute at the University College Dublin (UCD) (2005-present). With her research group & collaborators, she has achieved key breakthroughs in developing and demonstrating applications of high throughput array technology in biological, diagnostics & medical research. Prof. Cahill pioneered this research at the Max-Planck-Institute of Molecular Genetics in Berlin, Germany (1996-2003) and holds several granted international patents in this vital field. Some of her activities include: In 1996, she co-founded Protagen AG (https://protagen.com/) in Dortmund, including with Prof. Helmut Meyer, as a spin-out of the Max-Planck-Institute to commercialise her discoveries. Protagen Protein Services (https://protagenproteinservices.com/) a 2014 spin-off company of Protagen delivers expert protein, antibody, proteomics & peptide contract services to the pharmaceutical industry & health care sectors. Both companies have advanced these technologies & applications; Protagen has screened and profiled the autoantibody repertoire of over 20,000 patients (https://protagen.com/data-and-insight...). Protagen AG and Protagen Protein Services have over 200 employees in 2018. Since 2016, Prof. Cahill is a shareholder & Advisory Board member of Atturos Ltd, Prof. Stephen Pennington’s UCD spin-out company nvolved in improved Prostate Cancer diagnosis (atturos.com/ and atturos.com/company/advisors/). She received her Honours degree in Molecular Genetics from Trinity College Dublin (1989) and her PhD in Immunology from Dublin City University (1994). While studying in Trinity, she was awarded the Irish American Fellowship Prize (1988) to research at Prof. Pringle’s laboratory in the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA. During her undergraduate & PhD studies, she worked, including as Assistant Manager, in fine-dining Country Clubs in Long Island, New York (4 summers) & in Tenafly, New Jersey (4 summers). On obtaining her PhD, she obtained an EU ‘Human Capital & Mobility’ Post-doctoral Fellowship at the Technical University, Munich, Germany (1994-1995). Prof. Cahill became Group Leader of the Protein Technology Group in the Max-Planck-Institute of Molecular Genetics, Berlin (1996-2003). She obtained an Associate Professor position, in the Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Director of Proteomics Core, RCSI, Dublin (2000-2005). Since 2005 – present, she is Full Professor of Translational Science in the School of Medicine, University College Dublin and she has extensive management experience, including successfully obtaining funding from the European Commission (FP4, FP5, FP6, FP7 and Horizon 2020), Science Foundation Ireland, Enterprise Ireland, Health Research Board & successfully writing, project managing, publishing & reporting on all financial & regulatory aspects in academic & private sectors, in the companies she co-founded. She has over 100 peer reviewed publications, with over 5000 citations and a H-index is 31, which is in the top 10% globally for the Biomedicine discipline. Prof. Cahill is internationally recognised for her biomedical research, publications and patent record in life sciences, biotechnology, personalised healthcare, personalised medicine, diagnostics, biomarker discovery and validation, proteomics, biotechnology, high content protein and antibody arrays and their biomedical, diagnostic and clinical applications. Her publications have demonstrated utility and applications in the research, commercial & clinical sectors and include characterisation of antibodies specificity (including therapeutic antibodies), biomarker discovery, diagnostics, assay development, protein-interaction studies, proteomics, large scale/systems biology research, validating biomarker panels in diagnostic clinical trial, personalised medicine and assessing immune related adverse events. She has given over 100 Keynotes Lectures in Ireland, UK, Europe, USA, China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, South America. For example, she is invited to the ‘5th Precision Medicine and Biomarkers Leaders’ Summit’ in Munich in September 2018 & will Chair a Roundtable on Personalised Medicine and Adverse Events to discuss whether lessons can be learned from cancer immunotherapy and immune related adverse events to provide insight into understanding adverse events and personalised medicine and finding adverse event predictive biomarkers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted October 22, 2020 Author Share Posted October 22, 2020 Cure worse than disease? Some Covid-19 vaccines may increase HIV risk, scientists warn 22 Oct, 2020 10:59 A group of researchers in the US is sounding the alarm over several coronavirus vaccines currently undergoing clinical trials, warning that they may increase the risk of contracting HIV in subjects who take them. At least four of the current batch of Covid-19 vaccines in development at the clinical trial stage might increase patients' risk of contracting HIV, according to a team of scientists led by Susan Buchbinder, a University of California San Francisco professor and head of HIV Prevention Research at the San Francisco Department of Public Health. One of the vaccines is on the verge of phase 3 studies in Russia and Pakistan. Buchbinder and her colleagues have firsthand experience of this particular vaccine side effect from their previous research into a HIV vaccine. Their most promising candidate vaccine had the exact opposite effect to the desired outcome, leaving people even more vulnerable to the disease than they had been before. “We are concerned that use of an Ad5 vector for immunisation against SARS-CoV-2 could similarly increase the risk of HIV-1 acquisition among men who receive the vaccine,” they wrote. A vector is the method by which a vaccine is delivered to a target location. One of the more common vectors used in medical research is a genetically-modified adenovirus, a group of DNA viruses which usually cause eye and respiratory diseases. Several of the current batch of Covid-19 vaccines in development use an adenovirus as the delivery method for the genetic code of the coronavirus spike proteins, with a view to training our immune systems to recognize and fight off SARS-CoV-2. More often than not, genetically-modified adenoviruses used as vectors do not increase the risk of HIV. However, one specific one, called Ad5 (recombinant adenovirus type-5), was the culprit which undid Buchbinder and her team’s previous HIV vaccine and is at the center of the current vaccine controversy. The mechanism by which it increases the risk of contracting HIV is poorly-understood but seems to provoke the immune system in such a way that it provides HIV with even more targets than before, allowing it to gain a foothold in the body much faster. Immunologist Anthony Fauci, who has been director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases since 1984, warned against using this particular vector in vaccines distributed in areas at-risk of HIV spread back in 2014. Despite this, the companies behind the vaccines in question claim they are aware of the problem and have taken the risks into account during the vaccines' development. For example, ImmunityBio, which is currently testing its vaccine in California before the next stage which will take place in South Africa, claimed they had genetically 'muted' the Ad5 vector in their vaccine. Several vaccine trials have already been paused for adverse side effects and even death in one case. https://www.rt.com/news/504224-covid19-vaccine-candidates-hiv/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted October 23, 2020 Author Share Posted October 23, 2020 Child Identification Over one million (1,000,000) children are reported missing or kidnapped each year in the United States alone according to some statistics. Stepping in to assist in this enormous problem has been the fraternity of Freemasons with their CHIP - Child Identification - Programs. It's a unique concept: Masons - at no cost or obligation to the families involved - will provide a CD with film footage of the child, fingerprints, teeth impressions, and - in some cases - a DNA swab to the parents or guardian of a child so as to aid in their identification should some tragedy (abduction, accident, or whatever) befall the child. Many grand jurisdictions throughout the world are now implementing such programs in the hopes that the location of a missing child might be more readily found. There are several US states and Canadian provinces which participate and several have their own websites to announce upcoming program dates and locations. The Massachusetts ChIP Program is one such example. The cost of such programs are - clearly - high, both in terms of materials and personnel donated time. Having people available to perform the technical tasks (obtaining good fingerprints on a two year old isn't the easiest job in the world {grin}) as well as simple logistics (setting up tables, directing parents to the next 'station', keeping children from becoming bored with the wait which sometimes occurs) is extensive and exhaustive yet Freemasons give freely of both time and money for this wonderful charity. If your child (or grandchild) hasn't taken part in such a program, contact the Grand Lodge in your state/province to see if they offer one. (A list can be found on our site here.) Seeing the effectiveness of such a program, the Lions clubs in some states are also offering such services and we commend them for their efforts to help keep children safe. It's an example of a great idea that can really help! http://www.masonicinfo.com/childid.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted October 23, 2020 Author Share Posted October 23, 2020 Volunteer in AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine trial dies in Brazil Clinical trials for the drugmaker's vaccine remain on hold in the United States. Oct. 21, 2020, 6:40 PM BST / Updated Oct. 22, 2020, 1:29 PM BST By Sara G. Miller A volunteer in AstraZeneca's Covid-19 vaccine trial has died in Brazil, the country's National Health Surveillance Agency said Wednesday. The agency, Anvisa, said in a statement that it was formally notified of the death on Monday. https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/volunteer-astrazeneca-covid-19-vaccine-trial-dies-brazil-n1244166 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted October 26, 2020 Author Share Posted October 26, 2020 (edited) Non player characters You know the type....always repeating the state supplied propaganda on everything. They'll embrace the covid vaccine and allow the nanotech inside it to remould their brain. It will be no loss for them because they never thought for themselves anyway. Their consciousness never elevated above that base level of conditioned thrum where they then realised that everything they had been told their whole life was a lie. They never got to view the world anew through new eyes as a place that needed to be re-explored and re-assessed. They never went on that journey. They were always an expression of their conditioning and all that will happen when their brains become occupied by nanobots is that they will become an expression of the new society after the great reset and continue as the automatons of the brave new technocratic world The NHS is full of non player characters and i think its no coincidence that they will be the first in line for the vaccine. They'll cue up for it, in their droves, without a flicker of human disdain for fascism in their mind controlled eyes Edited October 26, 2020 by Macnamara 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted November 6, 2020 Author Share Posted November 6, 2020 (edited) Pride of britain award The pirate republic has decided to hold a pride of britain award for 2020. It's been a very trying year but at times of adversity people of true courage and great fortitude rise to the top to shine like a beacon for everyone. So after much deliberation the pirate council has come to its decision on this years pride of Britain award and its with great appreciation that we can now announce the winner; so without further ado the winner of this years pride of Britain award is.... ****opens imaginary envelope to build up the anticipation**** The Icke family! Yes for services rendered not only to the british people but also to all people around the world who the Ickes have worked tirelessly to liberate from the perception control of a satanic cult hellbent on global domination, they are the deserved winners of the 2020 pride of britain award. Thankyou kindly to you all for your incredible efforts and may the brush fires now appearing everywhere become a raging inferno as we enter 2021. Edited November 6, 2020 by Macnamara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted November 7, 2020 Author Share Posted November 7, 2020 (edited) 'Honesty first'.....honesty first! Ah so this is a change of approach now is it? So the vaccine industry is admitting that up to now they have not pursued an 'honesty first' approach! Well if they haven't pursued an honesty first approach up to now regarding vaccines then why should we trust them when they claim they are finally being honest? The reason they are having to take this tack of saying the vaccine might not prove 100% efficient right away is because what they are calling 'covid 19' is the flu (influenza around the world has vanished during this plandemic) and they know that the toxic, nanotech laced soup they intend to inject into humanity under the guise of fighting 'covid' is not about boosting health at all but rather about getting certain things INSIDE YOU and that's why they are admitting it ain't going to solve anything and that you shouldn't even expect it to solve anything! Coronavirus vaccine will be 'as safe as it can be' but scientist will admit there is no 100% guarantee in honesty-first fight against anti-vaxxers Department of Health and Cabinet Office created task force to promote vaccine Team will advertise jab on social media and TV but acknowledge it is not flawless A source told The Times: 'No clinician would ever say any vaccine is 100% safe' It follows revelations that GPs could offer vaccine on Christmas and Boxing Day By Katie Weston For Mailonline Published: 08:45, 7 November 2020 | Updated: 09:08, 7 November 2020 The coronavirus vaccine will be 'as safe as it can be' but scientists will admit there is no 100 per cent guarantee in an honesty-first fight against anti-vaxxers. As Pfizer and Oxford University enter into their final stages of testing with data suggesting a jab could be deployed 'within weeks', the Department of Health and the Cabinet Office have created a team of civil servants to publicise the vaccine. Once it has been authorised, the task force will advertise the jab via social media and television. But it will acknowledge that the vaccine is not flawless, in order to prevent people becoming disillusioned with the jab if it does not immediately bring an end to the pandemic. It follows revelations that GPs could offer a coronavirus vaccine on Christmas Day and Boxing Day in a rapid roll-out plan to protect the NHS. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8923645/Covid-19-vaccine-campaign-admit-jab-NOT-100-cent-safe-honesty-approach.html Edited November 7, 2020 by Macnamara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wingwang Posted November 7, 2020 Share Posted November 7, 2020 Shiver me timbers, I come to this thread and my leg fell off. A parrot has just landed on my shoulder as I type? WTF?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted November 8, 2020 Author Share Posted November 8, 2020 (edited) Molecular Mimicry Molecular Mimicry—Understanding the Link between Vaccines and Autoimmune Disease March 20, 2018 By the World Mercury Project Team Autoimmune diseases have become increasingly common in the United States and other high-income countries over the past several decades and now affect an estimated 5%-10% of the population in those countries. The broad category of “autoimmune disease” comprises over 100 different rheumatic, endocrinological, gastrointestinal and neurological conditions that ensue when the body’s immune responses get misdirected against itself. Researchers generally agree that environmental factors (including drugs and chemicals) are strongly to blame for the rise in autoimmune disorders, possibly in conjunction with genetic and epigenetic influences—and studies dating back to the mid-1990s indicate that vaccines, with their unique configuration of viral or bacterial antigens and adjuvants, are a biologically plausible trigger. The pathogenic hallmark of autoimmune disease is the production of proteins called autoantibodies, whereby the immune system mistakenly attacks the body’s own organs, tissues and cells instead of fighting external pathogens. Vaccines can prompt autoantibody production through a mechanism called “molecular mimicry.” As explained by Israeli researchers in a new review article in Cellular & Molecular Immunology, significant similarities between the pathogenic antigens contained in a vaccine and human proteins in the person receiving the vaccine can lead to immune “cross-reactivity” and “evolve into an autoimmune process targeting the…self-proteins.” …studies dating back to the mid-1990s indicate that vaccines, with their unique configuration of viral or bacterial antigens and adjuvants, are a biologically plausible trigger. Three examples The Israeli researchers reviewed three examples of probable molecular mimicry, considering the evidence linking the influenza, hepatitis B and human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines to vaccine-induced autoimmunity. Influenza: In 2009, tens of millions of Europeans and North Americans received an H1N1 influenza vaccine containing a novel adjuvant called AS03 (made up of alpha-tocopherol, squalene and polysorbate 80). Soon thereafter, reports began surfacing of sharp increases in two autoimmune conditions, narcolepsy and Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS)—including a two- to three-fold increased risk of GBS in the 42 days following vaccination. In the case of individuals with narcolepsy, research explaining the development of cross-reactivity and autoimmunity identified a similarity between an influenza vaccine nucleoprotein and a human receptor for the HCRT neurotransmitter (which helps regulate sleep-wake states). Molecular mimicry likewise has been posited as a potential mechanism linking influenza vaccine and GBS. Hepatitis B: A number of case reports have suggested a role of hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccines in the development of autoimmunity, particularly with regard to demyelinating diseases (conditions that damage the protective sheath surrounding nerve fibers in the brain, optic nerves and spinal cord). Demyelinating neuropathies include multiple sclerosis (MS), acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, transverse myelitis and others. A 2005 study established an initial “proof of concept for the theory of molecular mimicry leading to autoimmunity among HBV-vaccinated subjects.” The study looked at similarities between the recombinant (genetically engineered) small HBV surface antigen contained in the HBV vaccine and two human proteins often associated with myelin damage in MS (myelin basic protein and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein) and identified significantly more cross-reactivity in vaccinated subjects versus controls. HPV: Research has suggested a link between HPV vaccination and at least two autoimmune conditions: systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS)—an abnormal heart rate condition that frequently overlaps with chronic fatigue syndrome. In the case of SLE, the Israeli researchers have called attention in other publications to the “homology” (correspondence) between several of the viral peptides in the vaccine and the human peptides known to be dysregulated in SLE, as well as the molecular mimicry between specific HPV vaccine peptides and human proteins potentially associated with cardiac arrhythmias. …most vaccine experts ignore the aluminum adjuvants as a potentially significant environmental trigger for autoimmunity. Autoantibodies in autism Aluminum adjuvants are present in the majority of vaccines. The Israeli researchers point out that even though aluminum adjuvants are “applied…with the sole purpose of impairing immune tolerance” and potentiating immune response, most vaccine experts ignore the adjuvants as a potentially significant environmental trigger for autoimmunity. The willingness to overlook aluminum is somewhat surprising in light of other research linking neurotoxic metals—including mercury and lead—to the emergence of brain autoantibodies in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Mercury is still prevalent in many vaccines worldwide and in some vaccines in the U.S. In a study published in 2015, Egyptian investigators described the presence of anti-myelin basic protein (anti-MBP) autoantibodies in autistic children who had elevated blood mercury levels. Characterizing mercury as “one of the main candidate environmental triggers for autoimmunity in autism,” these researchers hypothesized that exposure to “mercury, dietary proteins and microbial antigens” (such as the antigens in vaccines) can launch a chain of autoimmune reactions that begins with molecular mimicry and generation of homologous autoantigens. Some researchers hypothesize that autoimmune brain pathology (such as is observed in ASD) requires an “event that increases barrier permeability allowing antibodies to traverse blood-brain barrier and gain access to brain tissue to inhibit and alter neuronal processes.” Both mercury and aluminum can damage the blood-brain barrier and enable vaccine antigens to enter the brain. Taking autoimmunity seriously Given the proliferation of over 100 autoimmune disorders since the mid-1940s, it is concerning that the three examples presented by the Israeli researchers are, by the authors’ own admission, still subject to “significant debate.” As they go on to explain, there is an unacceptable lack of high-quality scientific data on vaccine-related adverse events. Some of the many reasons why vaccine safety monitoring is flawed include variable diagnostic classification of cases, manipulation of the post-vaccination risk interval, inability to assess underreporting of adverse events (which the U.S. government acknowledges to be widespread), and “substantial publication bias favoring studies that support vaccine safety.” Instead of trying to bury adverse events as inconvenient to the monolithic vaccine safety narrative, we should be paying attention to the “red flags” that adverse reactions clearly represent. Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the World Mercury Project. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts. https://worldmercuryproject.org/news...mmune-disease/ Edited November 8, 2020 by Macnamara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted November 8, 2020 Author Share Posted November 8, 2020 (edited) On 9/30/2020 at 7:23 PM, Macnamara said: Astra Zenicas covid vaccine trials UK Vaccine Volunteer Contracts Transverse Myelitis, Inflammation affecting the Spinal Cord September 9, 2020 by IWB 1 volunteer in the UK has been diagnosed with transverse myelitis, an inflammatory syndrome affecting the spinal cord which is often sparked by viral infections. It's still unknown if the person's condition is directly linked to the vaccine – NYT t.co/3VRAw2JIY8 — BNO Newsroom (@BNODesk) September 9, 2020 Second AstraZeneca volunteer reportedly suffers rare neurological condition, but UK company says it’s not related to vaccine 20 Sep, 2020 16:28 / Updated 10 days ago Two people have fallen ill during the trials of AstraZeneca’s coronavirus vaccine in the UK, the company’s internal papers revealed, and a source said they had both suffered from the same serious neurological disorder. With these cases of transverse myelitis occurring in several of the test subjects of the covid vaccine lets really zoom in on that article on molecular mimicry which i posted in the post above this one and look again at this passage: Hepatitis B: A number of case reports have suggested a role of hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccines in the development of autoimmunity, particularly with regard to demyelinating diseases (conditions that damage the protective sheath surrounding nerve fibers in the brain, optic nerves and spinal cord). Demyelinating neuropathies include multiple sclerosis (MS), acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, transverse myelitis and others. A 2005 study established an initial “proof of concept for the theory of molecular mimicry leading to autoimmunity among HBV-vaccinated subjects.” The study looked at similarities between the recombinant (genetically engineered) small HBV surface antigen contained in the HBV vaccine and two human proteins often associated with myelin damage in MS (myelin basic protein and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein) and identified significantly more cross-reactivity in vaccinated subjects versus controls. Edited November 8, 2020 by Macnamara 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Screamingeagle Posted November 8, 2020 Share Posted November 8, 2020 On 9/30/2020 at 6:28 PM, Macnamara said: fear not matey there are no taxes in the pirate republic a bit late to the party....than again it is never to late for a pirate song Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted November 10, 2020 Author Share Posted November 10, 2020 Pfizer has announced a breakthrough RNA vaccine Two turkish immigrants to Europe have announced that they have created a new EXPERIMENTAL RNA vaccine which they claim is successful in treating sars cov-2. Could they be DONMEH (sabbatean crypto-jews)? More research is needed into that. RNA vaccines use a process called TRANSFECTION which is the one used to genetically modify organisms. Experiments were carried out using this method for vaccines in the past but they were discontinued when the test animals died. The research was then picked up again in recent years by the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation who then pumped money into that area of study. Here are the couple: Özlem Türeci (left) and Prof Uğur Şahin, the couple behind the new vaccine The Man Betting $1 Billion That Pfizer Can Deliver A Vaccine By This Fall Главная Процесс Медицина Пандемия коронавируса 21 мая 2020 The inside story behind the pandemic, the CEO and a promising, unproven treatment Pfizer’s most prominent effort is its work with Mainz, Germany–based BioNTech, an innovative $120 million (2019 sales) outfit that is mostly known for making cancer medications. The resulting experimental Covid-19 vaccine works with messenger RNA, a bleeding-edge technology that has never resulted in a successful treatment. Pfizer is hoping to get emergency-use authorization from the U.S. government for the vaccine by October. Its unique strategy is to rapidly pit four different mRNA vaccine candidates against one another and double down on the most likely winner. In January, Uğur Şahin, the brilliant immunologist who founded BioNTech, read an article about Covid-19 in The Lancet. Şahin built BioNTech to hack human cells to go after diseases, particularly cancer, and he thought similar tech might work against the coronavirus. Soon after, Şahin spoke to Thomas Strüngmann, the German pharma billionaire who for years has backed Şahin and his wife, immunologist Özlem Türeci, in their ventures. “He said, ‘This is a big disaster.’ He said the schools will be closed, that this will be a pandemic,” Strüngmann says, referring to Şahin. “He switched most of his team to the vaccine.” In February, Şahin (who is also now a billionaire, as BioNTech’s stock has soared) called up Kathrin Jansen, who heads vaccine research and development for Pfizer. Şahin told Jansen BioNTech had come up with vaccine candidates for Covid-19 and asked if Pfizer would be interested in working with him. “Uğur, you are asking?” Jansen replied. “Of course we are interested.” Over the last few years, scientists have become intrigued by the idea of using messenger RNA, the genetic molecule that gives cells protein-making instructions, to develop medicines for cancer, heart disease and even infectious viruses by transforming human cells into drug factories. Because SARS-CoV-2, as the coronavirus is formally known, is an RNA virus, researchers like Şahin focused on the idea of giving mRNA the cellular machinery to make proteins that would create virus-protecting antibodies. An mRNA vaccine has huge advantages over a traditional one. Because it can be made directly from the genetic code of the virus, it can be invented and entered into clinical trials in a matter of weeks, rather than months or years. But there’s a big downside: No one has ever successfully made one. BioNTech is not alone in pursuing an mRNA vaccine. Moderna Therapeutics, a biotech in Cambridge, Massachusetts, also got going in January and has launched a big human trial for its mRNA vaccine, backed by $483 million from the federal government. Moderna is likewise aiming to produce millions of doses per month by the end of the year. https://forbes.kz/process/medicine/the_man_betting_1_billion_that_pfizer_can_deliver_a_vaccine_by_this_fall/ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted November 10, 2020 Author Share Posted November 10, 2020 So we are to trust Pfizer with this new EXPERIMENTAL RNA vaccine? This is the company currently being fined $50 million dollars for carrying out experiments on CHILDREN in africa without the parents permission. The sense of entitlement of these people is terrifying. They feel entitled to do whatever the hell they like regardless of the potential for harm: Pfizer to pay £50m after deaths of Nigerian children in drug trial experiment Out of court settlement in the case that inspired 'The Constant Gardener' By Daniel Howden , Africa Correspondent Monday 6 April 2009 00:00 From the crowd that had gathered at the Kano Infectious Diseases Hospital, 200 sick children were picked. Half were given doses of the experimental Pfizer drug called Trovan and the others were treated with a proven antibiotic from a rival company. Eleven of the children died and many more, it is alleged, later suffered serious side-effects ranging from organ failure to brain damage. But with meningitis, cholera and measles still raging and crowds still queueing at the fence of the camp, the Pfizer team packed up after two weeks and left. That would probably have been an end to the story if it weren't for Pfizer employee, Juan Walterspiel. About 18 months after the medical trial he wrote a letter to the then chief executive of the company, William Steere, saying that the trial had "violated ethical rules". Mr Walterspiel was fired a day later for reasons "unrelated" to the letter, insists Pfizer. The company claims only five children died after taking Trovan and six died after receiving injections of the certified drug Rocephin. The pharmaceutical giant says it was the meningitis that harmed the children and not their drug trial. But did the parents know that they were offering their children up for an experimental medical trial? "No," Nigerian parent Malam Musa Zango said. He claims his son Sumaila, who was then 12 years old, was left deaf and mute after taking part in the trial. But Pfizer has denied this and says consent had been given by the Nigerian state and the families of those treated. It produced a letter of permission from a Kano ethics committee. The letter turned out to have been backdated and the committee set up a year after the original medical trial. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/pfizer-to-pay-16350m-after-deaths-of-nigerian-children-in-drug-trial-experiment-1663402.html 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted November 10, 2020 Author Share Posted November 10, 2020 (edited) The dangers of the RNA vaccine In the clip below there is a segment of Dr Hotez giving testimony saying that the RNA vaccine approach was discontinued in the 1960's after it killed children. It was only then taken up again by the Bill and Melinda Gates company who have pumped money into that research area. Before the clip i have posted an exxcerpt from his testimony: Dr. Peter Hotez Tells Congress That Children Died In Coronavirus Vaccine Trials (Video) July 27, 2020 In this clip, esteemed coronavirus vaccine expert Doctor Peter Hotez, who works with the Gates Foundation, testifies before U.S. Congress on March 5, 2020 about the risks and potential deaths of coronavirus vaccine. Please save this clip and share it widely. MARCH 5, 2020 | CLIP OF HOUSE SCIENCE, SPACE, AND TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE HEARING ON CORONAVIRUS Dr. Peter Hotez Addressing House Science, Space, and Technology Committee Hearing on Coronavirus, March 5, 2020 Excerpt: "When I say scientific challenge, one of the things we are not hearing a lot about is potential safety problems of coronavirus vaccines. This was first found in the 1960s with respiratory interstitial virus vaccines done in Washington with the NIH and Children's National Medical Center. Some of those kids who got the vaccine did worse and I believe there were two deaths. What happens with certain types of respiratory virus vaccine, to get immunized and when you are exposed to the virus you get this paradoxical enhancement phenomenon. We don't entirely understand the basis of it, that we recognize there's a real problem with certain respiratory virus vaccines. That killed the program for decades and now the Gates foundation is taking it up again, but then we start developing coronavirus vaccines. We noticed laboratory animals that they started to show some of the same pathology that resembled what it happened years earlier. This is going to be problematic..." I found this excerpt in search for Dr Hotez that took me to this blogpost: https://nofacemask.blogspot.com/2020/07/dr-peter-hotez-tells-congress-that.html So with the risks involved with this vaccine how can the big money of bill gates prevent people discussing the dangers so that they may make an informed choice for themselves and their families? Well they can get corrupt governments to make it illegal to discuss the potential dangers of vaccines and that is what is being proposed by certain corrupt people; this following headline begs the question: 'who decides what a vaccine 'myth' is? Surely only an open EXPLORATION of the issue and of the science is what can decide what is truth from what isn't but how can we do that if any questioning of the vaccine is criminalised? Clearly they are trying to hide something. This is medical FASCISM... Spreading anti-vaxx myths 'should be made a criminal offence' Royal Society and British Academy say public should be 'inoculated' against misinformation amid fears over Covid jab take-up By Sarah Knapton, Science Editor 10 November 2020 • 6:00am https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/11/10/spreading-anti-vaxx-myths-should-made-criminal-offence/ Edited November 10, 2020 by Macnamara 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted November 10, 2020 Author Share Posted November 10, 2020 Nanoparticles polluting vaccines say Italian scientists Stefano Montanari & Antonietta Gatti What's interesting is that they didn't find the same nanoparticulates in vaccines for animals thereby showing that the nanoparticles are not simply caused in the manufacturing process but rather are something that is being added specifically to vaccines for humans 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted November 11, 2020 Author Share Posted November 11, 2020 (edited) The Coranaid The Coranaid were a race of malevolent beings who came from asia and enslaved the britons in the Mabinogion. They appeared impossible to defeat as they had the ability to always hear what their enemies were saying which allowed them to always be one step ahead. In the end the britons learned that if you crushed a certain insect and mixed it with water you could cast this over the coranaid and it destroyed them but didn't harm the britons. They were driven from the land and the people enjoyed freedom again. Why this story still resonates today is because as we enter this new age of genetics where CRISPR technology can target certain genes there is a concern that technologies could be created that target certain ethnicities and there are certainly accounts out there of americans gathering DNA samples from russians and of chinese people gathering DNA samples of americans and so on and you have to wonder if in deep dark laboratories somewhere deep state scientists are working on bioweapons that could be targeted at certain demographics. Certainly there was that 'funvax' video circulating which snopes said was a fake but which was claimed to be a project that the pentagon was working on where a vaccine that could be administered as a spray was able to send nanotechnology to the brain that would then target a gene responsible for religious fanaticism! That sadly is the world we are moving into and it is one more reason to be cautious of the mass roll out of any drug such as the covid vaccine because there is this potential now for it to be a targeted bioweapon. Another area of concern moving forward is that of 'deepfakes' where technology is making it possible to create convincing video copies of other people where you can make it look like they are saying something which the real person never said. In fraught situations such as the current US election chaos the harmful potential of such tech can't be ignored as a false flag video could be released to stoke tensions or spark trouble. All of these developments should make society lean more to caution and hesitancy and yet we are being pushed harder than ever before into a future that is being decided for us. We need to slow the pace down here and start asking more questions, turning over more rocks, checking more things and people and not allow ourselves to be bullied and cajoled into quick or rash decisions that may have lasting consequences For example deep state actors like tony blair are calling for more covid testing and what does the testing do? It gives the state a sample of your DNA. At the same time we are also being told that one covid vaccine is not going to be enough and that multiple vaccines will be required. Well think about that....if they are gathering DNA and making different vaccines it gives them the opportunity to tailor vaccines to what they have discovered about peoples DNA and it gives them a chance to evolve what they are doing over each vaccine and testing drive So they test and get your DNA sample then they give you an RNA vaccine that changes your DNA....then they repeat the process multiple times! Edited November 11, 2020 by Macnamara 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted November 12, 2020 Author Share Posted November 12, 2020 (edited) In the news The metropolitan police stood by for two hours while extinction rebellion protestors hung a climate change banner in front of the cenotaph thereby politicising a place that is supposed to be a memorial for the fallen and providing ample time for the stunt to be photographed and promoted on social media and beyond. If that's not an indication that extinction rebellion are just a psyop being pushed by the establishment itself then I don't know what is. I wonder if i had gone and hung a banner there saying that covid was a scamdemic if i would have been allowed such leeway? Meanwhile BLM are going after statues up and down the country and yet no one is campaigning to have the dodgy statue of a man standing behind a naked child on the front of the BBC building in london that was carved by the pedophile Eric Gill taken down; of course that didn't stop him being awarded the royal designer for industry by the royal society of arts.... Speaking of statues a new statue to celebrate the author and thinker mary wollstonecraft was unveiled showing a small naked lady standing on a large silver jet of something. The creation of crap sculptures in public spaces is all part of cultural marxism to create a degenerate culture and the irony of having a statue depicting a naked woman which is supposed to be a celebration of a woman for her mind who herself argued that women could think for themselves and not be reduced down to one dimensional sex objects is staggering. What the hell is wrong with people? Another insane story from this last week is the one about a nurse who has been arrested for killing 8 babies and attempting to kill 10 more in a neonatal care unit in chester. This brings a number of questions to mind. None of the articles say how exactly she killed the babies or attempted to kill the others except by saying that there were strange blotches on the childrens limbs. So were they injected with something or exposed to something toxic? It seems so incredible that babies can die in this manner without the suspicions of the other staff being aroused. What were they all doing? It makes me wonder if she was a lone wolf psychopath acting out of some sick personal motivation or if she is the fallguy for wider and deeper problems occurring in that care unit and if so whether the same problems could be occurring in care units up and down the country. Sure its possible that she was a lone psychopath but it sounds like people she knew spoke up for her the first time she was arrested and that there were no other indications that she was of such an evil mind. If the police are correct in their assertion that she is a lone psychopath then that then begs the question of whether neonatal care units might be the kind of place such people might gravitate to in order to cause maximum damage to people under the cover of supposed 'care' and if people in those units as well as practices in those units should be under greater scrutiny. Either way something very wrong has been going on there and I'd like to know more details about the case. The news reports are very strangely vague the story is reported here: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8941335/Childrens-nurse-30-charged-murdering-eight-babies-trying-murder-10-more.html Edited November 12, 2020 by Macnamara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted November 12, 2020 Author Share Posted November 12, 2020 As the government destroys the economy through repeated lockdowns they claim that their actions are to 'save the NHS' and yet we learn that they have spent three times the annual NHS budget on this whole covid flu hysteria What else could you have achieved with that £333 BILLION if you hadn't wasted it on chinese ventilators & PPE and PR consultants? How much money is being wasted on testing? You can test people as much as you like but it doesn't change a damn thing about their health or the strength of their immune system or their level of stress or their economic wellbeing. Testing achieves NOTHING tangible. All it does is transfer public wealth into the hands of the corporations who provide the testing kits. Think what you could have done for HEALTH in general with that budget. Think what you could have done to relieve poverty around the country and how many lives that would have saved. Government has spent £333bn on the coronavirus pandemic - more than TWICE the NHS budget: Costs hit £83bn for furlough plus £40bn for 'moonshot' Covid tests as public debt soars above £2TRILLION The cost to the taxpayer is now more than twice the annual NHS England budget Includes £240billion from Treasury on measures to save the economy and jobs £40billion is being spent on the new 'moonshot' coronavirus testing system £12billion has been spent on much-critisised Test and Trace system By David Wilcock, Whitehall Correspondent For Mailonline Published: 13:48, 11 November 2020 | Updated: 13:53, 11 November 2020 Government spending on anti-coronavirus measures has surpassed an eye-watering third of a trillion pounds since the pandemic began. Analysis by MailOnline shows that the cost to the taxpayer of saving lives and securing jobs and businesses has reached an astonishing £333billion - more than twice the annual NHS England budget. The spending includes around £240billion from the Treasury on measures to save the economy and jobs - including around £83 million on furlough. Billions more are being spent on the new 'moonshot' coronavirus testing system that is being piloted in Liverpool before a nationwide roll-out. And the estimated £40billion cost that has emerged so far is just for the cost of manufacturing the tests and having them analysed in labs across the UK. It does not include the administrative and logistical costs involved with such a massive project. On top of the identified spending there is also likely to be billions more in associated costs like an increase in benefit payments caused by the increase in unemployment - although furlough spending is designed to reduce the number of people who find themselves out of work. The huge figures are likely to cause consternation among Tory MPs. British government debt has surpassed £2trillion, or 103.5 per cent of gross domestic product, its highest since 1960 when the country was still recovering from heavy spending during World War Two. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8937947/Government-spent-333bn-coronavirus-pande.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted November 13, 2020 Author Share Posted November 13, 2020 The mocking of conspiracy theorists has a short shelf life Periodically there are pieces written in the newspapers that mock 'conspiracy theorists' but the problem they are going to have is that time and time again the things the conspiracy theorists say are going to happen then happen. As the conspiracy rolls out it will become increasingly apparent that it isn't a 'theory' at all. So we have been saying for years that the cabal intend to create a new digital currency so that they can pay all the unemployed universal basic income. Sure enough there is more and more talk about UBI and now we are seeing the country propped up by furlough money and in the telegraph today there is a piece admitting this: Why the Bank of England is considering a digital currency It sounds dramatic, but the purpose behind the idea is complex and the benefits remain somewhat murky By Tim Wallace 13 November 2020 • 11:00am https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2020/11/13/bank-england-considering-digital-currency/ And yet as more and more of the pieces of the conspiracy fall into place for all the world to see the cabal has its useful idiots out there trying to deny that there is any kind of plan behind it all.....what a bunch of clowns! The literary origins of QAnon: the Holy Grail, the Illuminati and an innocent English footballer The bizarre conspiracy theory has taken hold in America. Has a small group of jesters bitten off more than they intended to chew? By Sam Leith 11 November 2020 • 3:59pm This theory holds, for those who haven’t been burrowing through the madder corners of the internet lately, that the world is run by a secret cabal of Jewish Satan-worshipping cannibal paedophiles who hold trafficked child sex slaves in a network of secret tunnels below Washington DC. Nathanael West’s comic novel A Cool Million – published as long ago as 1934 – contains a smart joke that feels very contemporary. At a political rally we see a rather familiar sort of demagogue called Shagpoke Whipple ranting: “We must drive the Jewish international bankers out of Wall Street! We must destroy the Bolshevik labor unions! We must purge our country of all the alien elements and ideas that now infest her! America for Americans!” As he orates away, a burly man peels unobserved away from the back of the crowd and makes a pair of swift, cryptic phone calls. A few minutes later: “Mr. Whipple had just enrolled his 27th recruit when the forces of both the international Jewish bankers and the Communists converged on his meeting. They arrived in high-powered black limousines and deployed through the streets with a skill which showed long and careful training in that type of work.” That’s just a gag in a satirical novel, of course. Or is it? https://www.telegraph.co.uk/books/authors/literary-origins-qanon-holy-grail-illuminati-innocent-english/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted November 16, 2020 Author Share Posted November 16, 2020 The following piece in a newspaper says that children who have been given antibiotics before the age of two are more likely to develop certain health issues but why are children being given antibiotics before the age of two if they are healthy? May i suggest that the reason some children are receiving antibiotics before the age of two is because their health has been damaged by vaccines and that the vaccine damage is what will then go on to give them the other problems such as asthma, allergies, eczema and so on Children given antibiotics before the age of two may be more likely to suffer from allergies, asthma and other chronic illnesses, study finds US experts analysed the health records and prescription history of 14,500 kids Some 70 per cent of the children were given antibiotics before the age of two Those given multiple courses were more likely to have multiple chronic illnesses By Ian Randall For Mailonline Published: 11:48, 16 November 2020 | Updated: 11:49, 16 November 2020 Children may be more likely to suffer from chronic illnesses like allergies, asthma, eczema and obesity if given antibiotics before the age of two, a study has warned. US researchers analysed the health records of 14,500 children and found a correlation between chronic illness and early antibiotic use. The team have speculated that the antibiotics — while used to help fight off 'bad' bacteria — can impact the beneficial microbes that make up our gut microbiome. Allergies — which are the most common chronic disorder among children — affect more than one-in-four people in the UK at some point in their lives. Antibiotics are used to treat bacterial infections like urinary tract infections, but are not effective against viruses such as the common cold or coronavirus. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-8953359/Health-Babies-given-antibiotics-likely-suffer-chronic-illnesses.html Meanwhile some people in the NHS are beginning to question the safety of vaccines. Lets hope this group grows and goes from strength to strength as the more people who speak out the more people will break out of the climate of fear that the government and media has created where people don't feel that they can speak the truth about anything in this country anymore Matt Hancock slams NHS 'anti-vaxxer' group that compares Pfizer jab to 'poison' and is opposed to wearing masks and testing in hospitals after more than 300 workers sign up NHS Workers for Choice, No Restrictions for Declining a Vaccine surged in size The group compares the Pfizer jab to 'poison' and is opposed to wearing masks Members include GP worker, A&E nurses, healthcare assistants and lab workers Health Secretary Matt Hancock branded the group 'entirely inappropriate' today Four out of five want people who spread fake vaccine news to face prosecution By James Gant For Mailonline Published: 09:22, 16 November 2020 | Updated: 15:50, 16 November 2020 Matt Hancock has slammed more than 300 NHS workers and care home staff for joining an 'anti-vaxxer' group. The Health Secretary branded Facebook page NHS Workers for Choice, No Restrictions for Declining a Vaccine 'entirely inappropriate'. Posts on the account compare the Pfizer jab to 'poison', some are opposed to wearing face coverings and others rail against testing in hospitals. The group is reported to include Sheffield-based GP Julie Coffey - who has said she will not wear masks in shops - A&E nurses, healthcare assistants and lab workers. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8952939/NHS-workers-join-anti-vaxxer-group-compares-Pfizer-jab-poison-opposed-masks.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted November 16, 2020 Author Share Posted November 16, 2020 On 10/7/2020 at 10:20 PM, Macnamara said: However as the elites move to realise their vision they have to of course break cover more and more and in order to do this unopposed they must sell their vision of the technocratic society to you hence Boris and his call for a 'new jerusalem'. We are going to hear more and more voices on the TV, radio and in the newspapers pushing various aspects of this vision such as windpower, driverless cars, smart meters, microchipping, 5G etc etc "The Great Reset" Trends On Twitter After Justin Trudeau Says Pandemic Has Provided "Opportunity" by Tyler Durden Mon, 11/16/2020 Authored by Paul Joseph Watson via Summit News, “The Great Reset” began trending on Twitter after Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said the coronavirus pandemic had provided an “opportunity for a reset.” Trudeau made the comments during a United Nations video conference back in September, but they are only just receiving attention. “Building back better means getting support to the most vulnerable while maintaining our momentum on reaching the 2030 agenda for sustainable development and the SDGs (Sustainable Development Goals)” said Trudeau. “This pandemic has provided an opportunity for a reset – this is our chance to accelerate our pre-pandemic efforts to re-imagine economic systems that actually address global challenges like extreme poverty, inequality and climate change,” he added. Trudeau is saying that the purpose of Coronavirus is for ‘The Great Reset’. The Cabal are coming out of hiding now — derf_anon (@derf_anon) November 15, 2020 Many Twitter users asserted that “The Great Reset” was a “conspiracy theory” despite the fact that it’s an agenda openly espoused by the World Economic Forum and numerous other financial elitists and NGOs. https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/great-reset-trends-twitter-after-justin-trudeau-says-pandemic-has-provided-opportunity Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.