Jump to content

9/11 EXPOSED IN 10 MINUTES


singhz312

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, Comedy Time said:

 

I know, because I am kicking your arse.

You are kicking nothing here, all you are doing is create animosity in EVERY POST in all threads you "contribute" to.

You make a fool of yourself and we all see it.

Some people should be banned on here but yet they can't be as they are always on border line and yet not enough to justify a ban.

I've seen other arrogant clowns like you and you don't impress me. Go back to your sandbox and come back when you mature.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, wideawake said:

You are kicking nothing here, all you are doing is create animosity in EVERY POST in all threads you "contribute" to.

You make a fool of yourself and we all see it.

Some people should be banned on here but yet they can't be as they are always on border line and yet not enough to justify a ban.

I've seen other arrogant clowns like you and you don't impress me. Go back to your sandbox and come back when you mature.

 

 

Wow, look at that total piece of ad hominem shite. You are addressing ME and not the post you are afraid to answer. I don't have arrogance with logical and honest responses, only sometimes with people equally arrogant in their defence and denial. You are the one being rude here, not me.

 

26 minutes ago, wideawake said:

You make a fool of yourself and we all see it.

 

Appealing to the crowd. You aren't the spokesperson for the crowd. I imagine there are some genuine truth seekers who want to know how the bodies and planes were disposed off, how they created plane shaped holes with bleedin' missiles or no planes. I think genuine truth seekers will look at the analysis of the Pentagon footage and think oh, there IS a plane there when you pixel extraction of two frames. I have performed this myself long ago with the help of a Python programmer friend....it is accurate.

 

You are afraid to be wrong, simple as that. There is no arrogance in finding flaws in theories and asking those who fail to see them why they cannot!!

 

p.s. I see you've gone to a busier thread to seek "reinforcements"

Edited by Comedy Time
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/16/2020 at 8:53 AM, Comedy Time said:

 

Irony. A total off topic personal post. You seem unable to debate numerous things I am putting up...why is that?

 

1. How did they make the plane sized holes go inwards? The columns bent inwards.

2. What crazy world has the MASSIVE team involved creating video showing it doing "impossible" speeds.  Kinda dumb don't you think? Answer please.

 

 

Now we are into the following territory:

  • Nobody must see the Tomahawk missile. Including air-traffic control.
  • A team must be quickly assembled to invisibly and very quickly sprinkle plane parts all over The Pentagon. Emergency services on route + news teams/helicopters.
  • The actual plane and all passengers must be disposed off.
  • The bodies must be burnt and mashed and a team/person to sprinkle the DNA quickly all over the crash site(s).
  • A team to launch the missile from somewhere.
  • A team to set charges to bust the internal walls and set aircraft fuel charges.
  • Somebody to set the charges to blow the light poles and the generator.
  • Somebody/a team to create the general shape of a plane in the wall with explosives

 

 

 

 

 

@wideawake All your one liners and off topic posts and my one above ignored and dumped off the latest page! Why are so afraid to answer here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see your name Comedy Time,and I know that any thread you join will end in absolute boredom.

You suck the air out of the room.

I can,t wait till your gone.

You are tedious,you really need go away,far away.

The only person who thinks your really clever is you.

You are  a valuable lesson in how to recognize  grade A narcissism ,so thanks for that.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree. I enjoy the alternate opinion even if it does seem stretched for the sake of it in some cases, for instance

 

By CT logic, the explosion will become longer away from impact on the videos the more they are downloaded and uploaded. Because of compression and loss of clarity.. Eventually if shared enough the video will end before you get to see the explosion. 🙂

 

I haven't posted anything until now because I know it's not worth arguing, but I bring that up and comment now because I don't wish CT to be disappeared- not that it's on the cards or anything-  it's haunting to see how many people here wish to cancel stuff/people they don't want to hear just like those nuts on the far left. IMO.

 

There's the possibility of ignoring him.. either by will or by forum tool.

 

Let's have some more comedy time now, trying to wiggle out of what I posted about the video compression lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, - TZC - said:

By CT logic, the explosion will become longer away from impact on the videos the more they are downloaded and uploaded. Because of compression and loss of clarity.. Eventually if shared enough the video will end before you get to see the explosion. 🙂

 

Let's have some more comedy time now, trying to wiggle out of what I posted about the video compression lol

 

Firstly I don't ever need to wriggle out of anything. Honest and convincing debate always works with me. Secondly what specifically are you talking about? Thirdly, are you a no planer because there are about a dozen things your team are evading.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Comedy Time said:

 

Firstly I don't ever need to wriggle out of anything. Honest and convincing debate always works with me. Secondly what specifically are you talking about? Thirdly, are you a no planer because there are about a dozen things your team are evading.

 

 

 

 

I am just wondering why you seem to derail and cause friction in every thread you post in. I did post explaining that I have seen this in other forums that discuss cases before the courts....and how I found out that prosecutors, police and the like frequent these forums to divert public attention to the official narrative regarding a case.  This is a fact... as I have been researching for a very notorious case for a certain reason. When I see your posts I get the same feel... it`s ok if you ignore my post again... I have broad shoulders.... but can you tell me why you derail threads and are so convinced that the official narrative of  Sept 11 2001 is the right one because so far you havent managed to convince me by your argument. If it was just this thread I would say you are obsessed with the whole 9 eleven story...but its every thread you are in.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Comedy Time said:

Secondly what specifically are you talking about?

Your response to my question in this thread. The posts were not quoted but I gave a decent outline. I hoped for more than you gave in your response. . but it is what it is. I'm a no planer and you're right. 😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone still banging on about beams melting point and jet fuels temp - is either trolling or being willfully stupid - The points been adressed so often -theres shrimp in the marianas trench that know why thats a red herring based on what "Karen thinks" rather than any understanding of basic science

Edited by Eldnah
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Well, it does wake up a lot of people. 

In the Super Bowl they used about 20 children that were said to be dead in a terrible tragedy. Photos were used that were from 5-7 years prior. Forensics can take any footage and link it back to anything its that sophisticated. Do they do it, no. Just like they dont investigate the death of JFK b/c they came up with a crafted story line, and they wont investigate covid over concerns that the flu kills more people. 

 

These lies are getting so big that its hard not to get consumed by them and karma is a real thing. 

 

So, when it comes down to it, 9/11 is pretty obvious. Maybe not so obvious as Bushs boyfriend across the sea channel named Blair. lol lol :) They were IN IT together for sure!!

Edited by MatchaLove
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
  • 4 weeks later...

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2002/03/jules-gedeon-naudet-world-trade-center-film

 

https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0360137/bio?ref_=nm_ov_bio_sm

 

Red flags abounding...

 

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=The+New+York+Daily+News&t=canonical&atb=v220-1&ia=web

 

By the way, time is an illusion.

 

just a quick clip, BLATANTLY obvious media complicity/criminal manipulation, major news=mind-control movies and skits.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/zev8RGD4poSr/

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...