Jump to content

9/11 EXPOSED IN 10 MINUTES


Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, singhz312 said:

Guys please support my video on bitchute and like and share if you have an account.. I think it has hit a few nerves of some shills and agents as I don't think anyone has seen much like this before.... Let's get this video out there!!

 

Your video is shite and you haven't responded to a post I made showing the problems with video recording and transfer. September clues did this nearly 15 years ago and that was shite as well. Debunked to death.

 

6 hours ago, singhz312 said:

I am 95% sure @Comedy Timis a shill/agent

 

You don't know much do you. In the space of 2hrs you went from 99% to 95% - keep going and you may even reach the truth.

 

Planes. Big fast planes.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 142
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Hey man, don't waste your time engaging with Comedy Time. He is a shill who is here to rebuke/refute absolutely anything you say, regardless of what evidence or lack of on his part you provide.  

BITCHUTE VIDEO LINK: 9/11 EXPOSED IN 10 MINUTES   Hi guys,   After attending the Trafalgar square march I signed up here - I have made a very short documentary in my free time..

Have a few memes          

Posted Images

9 hours ago, singhz312 said:

Hahaah I have seen that picture of that same engine posted all over the internet, easily planted off a dump truck.

 

Uhuh. So.....

  • A team to prepare all the plane parts for distribution around New York.
  • A team to go around invisibly dumping parts - hoping nobody sees people unloading a bloody plane engine AFTER two just hit the big buildings nearby.
  • No paper trail for this minor operation - but how many people to be in the loop and kept permanently quiet?

 

9 hours ago, singhz312 said:

Where are the pieces falling from impact in the videos? The hezerkhani footage is one of the clearest and you can see nothing 

 

Why would you, the objects compared to that shot are less than a pixel. It's grainy, unknown generations of it.

 

9 hours ago, singhz312 said:

Don't call me a newbie, you don't know me - in fact I can guarantee I have been researching 9/11 for longer than you

 

You've made 13 posts dude. You're a newbie.You can't guarantee jack. You've been "researching" 911 but didn't know that September clues already did a silly no-plane movie, or that plane parts were found all over the place. You threw your toys out of the pram when I mentioned them and now you arm wave them away with invisible plane part fairies.

 

Edited by Comedy Time
Link to post
Share on other sites

@Comedy Time

What has my number of posts on a david icke forum got to do anything? is that some sort of status to you???

 

Where are the plane pieces falling? Let alone a massive engine???

 

Not even a single scrap can be seen falling lol. You are either deluded or a shill - which one, you choose

no pieces.gif

Edited by singhz312
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, singhz312 said:

What has my number of posts on a david icke forum got to do anything? is that some sort of status to you???

 

Nope, Try to keep up. I called you a "newbie" because you are a newbie. You said you weren't. I showed you were.

 

1 minute ago, singhz312 said:

Where are the plane pieces falling? Let alone a massive engine???

 

Exit holes. Why "let alone" a massive engine? It hit at over 500mph it has lots of kinetic energy. If nothing directly blocks its path with sufficient energy to stop it, it keeps on going.

 

1 minute ago, singhz312 said:

Not even a single scrap can be seen falling lol. You are either deluded or a shill - which one, you choose

 

Hahahaha..... And you post a picture of the entry point as your idea of where to check for this???

 

False dichotomy. I am neither deluded as there WERE planes, I am not a shill - there is no need or demand (where do I apply?) and the 3rd alternative the parts went out the exit holes - you know momentum and all thatrabugento1.gif

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, singhz312 said:

Mr (not a newbie on david icke forum) 326 posts? 

I have probably made about 30,000 if you include the old forum and the rant room which didn't add to post count. But thanks anyway.

 

9 minutes ago, singhz312 said:

Ok so going by your logic, what about the plane pieces no plane shrapnel can be seen falling, you're now gonna tell me they got evaporated?

 

They were ejected at high velocity out of the exit holes. I recall one video showing the engine, I'll see if I can dig it up. You just twiddle your thumbs, do something productive.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, singhz312 said:

Ok so going by your logic, what about the plane pieces Mr (not a newbie on david icke forum) 326 posts? no plane shrapnel can be seen falling, you're now gonna tell me they got evaporated?

 

Hey man, don't waste your time engaging with Comedy Time. He is a shill who is here to rebuke/refute absolutely anything you say, regardless of what evidence or lack of on his part you provide.

 

Ignore him and hopefully he will go away.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Haunted Universe said:

Ignore him 

 

That's what you excel at. 

 

Explain how the buildings show inwards explosions at the impact points....nothing comes outwards.

 

That is some impossible magic right there. You ignore because you cannot answer. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

@singhz312 Dude, have you ever heard the expression "gish gallup"?

 

I believe I have a reasonable amount of un-addressed content aimed at you and you have just moved on to variations of the same claim. Using a blurred zoomed video tracking a very fast object will cause all sorts of imaging errors.These aren't digital HD films they are crusty videos that get converted to digital and uploaded god knows how many times.Every time it does this some sort of degradation goes on, often from compression.

 

On your example, the exposure for the left edge of the building is so poor you can "see" the sky behind it. That should tell you all you need to know about it. If I had to guess at what is happening it would be the left edge of the building has bled across the image slightly - clearly there is no positive line there.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/1/2020 at 7:31 AM, Comedy Time said:

A team to go around invisibly dumping parts - hoping nobody sees people unloading a bloody plane engine AFTER two just hit the big buildings nearby.

How big was the exclusion zone after the collapse?

When was the engine discovered?

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Reet Hard said:

Irrelevant.

 

I appear to have acquired a stalker.  He is going around the forum responding to all my quotes on various threads and posting pissy one liners.

 

The use of newbie was most certainly relevant in the original context in which it was used. You interject into an exchange without bothering to check any of the posts around it. It is none of your business unless you are actually shit stirring. 

 

1. He says this: "What do you mean plane parts? Man this guy needs to be banned from for forums for spreading misinfo "

2. I said this: "I need to be banned for debating with a newbie raking up shit that has been covered already about a thousand times?"

3. He then said this: "Don't call me a newbie, you don't know me - in fact I can guarantee I have been researching 9/11 for longer than you  I am 99% sure you are an agent."

4. I said this: "You've made 13 posts dude. You're a newbie."

 

HE had a comprehension problem as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, Comedy Time said:

I appear to have acquired a stalker.  He is going around the forum responding to all my quotes on various threads and posting pissy one liners.

 

Dear Rupert/Carlos, Comedy Time,

 

The problem isn't that I am responding to your posts it is that you apparently can't handle people responding to your posts on a public forum.

 

Furthermore, regardless of why you said it, commenting on how new someone is to the forum is always irrelevant.

 

Your constant name calling of anyone who disagrees with you is very silly please stop it, thank you.

 

You have to appreciate that you must stay polite and emotionally detached regardless of how "batshit" you may think other peoples' opinions are because that is the only way we will get to the truth.

 

As I have said before, I am not a no planer and believe planes (all be it military ones) did hit the towers but that is not what made them collapse.

 

Please act with more decorum moving forward, thank you.

 

Regards,

 

Reet Hard.

 

 

Edited by Reet Hard
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Comedy Time said:

 

I appear to have acquired a stalker.  He is going around the forum responding to all my quotes on various threads and posting pissy one liners.

 

The use of newbie was most certainly relevant in the original context in which it was used. You interject into an exchange without bothering to check any of the posts around it. It is none of your business unless you are actually shit stirring. 

 

1. He says this: "What do you mean plane parts? Man this guy needs to be banned from for forums for spreading misinfo "

2. I said this: "I need to be banned for debating with a newbie raking up shit that has been covered already about a thousand times?"

3. He then said this: "Don't call me a newbie, you don't know me - in fact I can guarantee I have been researching 9/11 for longer than you  I am 99% sure you are an agent."

4. I said this: "You've made 13 posts dude. You're a newbie."

 

HE had a comprehension problem as well.

Are you on the Kim Kardashian show? You love drama or what?

 

You seem to be extremely active on here and reply very quick... I wonder what your full time job is 👀👀👀

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, singhz312 said:

You sure love that same old engine pic

 

That engine pic shows people milling around it. Now MY logic tells me that nobody was able to roll up in a van and invisibly dump the rather heavy plane engine. Bearing in mind that you categorically denied any plane parts, it leaves you with some explaining.

 

3 minutes ago, singhz312 said:

Where's your engine pic in the Pennsylvania "plane impacts"?

 

9/11 News Coverage: 10:03 AM: UA 93 Crashes in Pennsylvania - YouTube

 

Smashed to tiny pieces probably. Maximum speed impact into an impenetrable surface.....things are going to be sent in numerous directions and in small pieces, incluing the poor passengers and airline staff.

https://www.tnonline.com/20170501/coroner-details-flight-93-crash/

 

 

https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a5688/debunking-911-myths-flight-93/

FACT: Experts on the scene tell PM that a fan from one of the engines was recovered in a catchment basin, downhill from the crash site. Jeff Reinbold, the National Park Service representative responsible for the Flight 93 National Memorial, confirms the direction and distance from the crash site to the basin: just over 300 yards south, which means the fan landed in the direction the jet was traveling. "It's not unusual for an engine to move or tumble across the ground," says Michael K. Hynes, an airline accident expert who investigated the crash of TWA Flight 800 out of New York City in 1996. "When you have very high velocities, 500 mph or more," Hynes says, "you are talking about 700 to 800 ft. per second. For something to hit the ground with that kind of energy, it would only take a few seconds to bounce up and travel 300 yards." Numerous crash analysts contacted by PM concur.

 

https://www.tnonline.com/20170501/coroner-details-flight-93-crash/

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, singhz312 said:

Are you on the Kim Kardashian show? You love drama or what?

 

You seem to be extremely active on here and reply very quick... I wonder what your full time job is 👀👀👀

 

 

MOD NOTE;
Are you here to attack members or are you here to debate topics ?
BC
 

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Comedy Time said:

 

That engine pic shows people milling around it. Now MY logic tells me that nobody was able to roll up in a van and invisibly dump the rather heavy plane engine. Bearing in mind that you categorically denied any plane parts, it leaves you with some explaining.

 

 

Smashed to tiny pieces probably. Maximum speed impact into an impenetrable surface.....things are going to be sent in numerous directions and in small pieces, incluing the poor passengers and airline staff.

https://www.tnonline.com/20170501/coroner-details-flight-93-crash/

 

 

https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a5688/debunking-911-myths-flight-93/

FACT: Experts on the scene tell PM that a fan from one of the engines was recovered in a catchment basin, downhill from the crash site. Jeff Reinbold, the National Park Service representative responsible for the Flight 93 National Memorial, confirms the direction and distance from the crash site to the basin: just over 300 yards south, which means the fan landed in the direction the jet was traveling. "It's not unusual for an engine to move or tumble across the ground," says Michael K. Hynes, an airline accident expert who investigated the crash of TWA Flight 800 out of New York City in 1996. "When you have very high velocities, 500 mph or more," Hynes says, "you are talking about 700 to 800 ft. per second. For something to hit the ground with that kind of energy, it would only take a few seconds to bounce up and travel 300 yards." Numerous crash analysts contacted by PM concur.

 

https://www.tnonline.com/20170501/coroner-details-flight-93-crash/

That doesn't explain why it's only a hole in the ground and why google have been deleting images of the Pennsylvania plane impact  

I want to see pictures not and brutal evidence, not text. Anyone can write text (and make up stories ;)), I want pictures and evidence

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...