Jump to content

9/11 EXPOSED IN 10 MINUTES


singhz312

Recommended Posts

BITCHUTE VIDEO LINK: 9/11 EXPOSED IN 10 MINUTES

 

Hi guys,

 

After attending the Trafalgar square march I signed up here - I have made a very short documentary in my free time..

 

This video aims to identify the mass global deception of 9/11 and how involved the mainstream media actually were in faking and editing videos as well as aiding secret services in carrying out this staged event.

 

20 years later from 2001 the CGI errors and fakery starts to show, it would be a benefit if you know how video layering works. Forget about the nose out distraction and the missile that was edited onto the bottom of the plane in videos and pictures which was put out there to distract the masses from the real truth.

 

This is my first video on bitchute and post here so please be nice, subscribe and share! Much more to come!

 

p.s. Does anyone know how to embed non-youtube videos with an iframe link?

Edited by singhz312
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that's pretty good singhz ....

 

Much of the video (starting at 3:30) deals with the planes impacting the towers ... very detailed slow motion analysis of hard to come by footage I have never seen before ... 

 

Essential viewing for those undecided about whether real planes hit the towers , leaves no doubt advanced holographic projection tech was used , either from satellite or cloaked craft 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes this video doesn't go into any detail about what technology was used, but undeniably gives brutal evidence that video layering and CGI was used and the planes cannot be real.

 

Can we promote this video here on the forum? Anyone with a bitchute account can you please like, comment and subscribe the video.

 

I am already getting some hate on from haters/agents/truth deniers whatever you wanna call them.

Edited by singhz312
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, oz93666 said:

I think that's pretty good singhz ....

 

Much of the video (starting at 3:30) deals with the planes impacting the towers ... very detailed slow motion analysis of hard to come by footage I have never seen before ... 

 

Essential viewing for those undecided about whether real planes hit the towers , leaves no doubt advanced holographic projection tech was used , either from satellite or cloaked craft 

 

Is there anyway we can promote the video here?

 

I am already getting hate on the video from bitchute truth deniers/agents, anyone with a bitchute account please support by liking, commenting or subbing. Thanks

Edited by singhz312
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, singhz312 said:

Yes this video doesn't go into any detail about what technology was used, but undeniably gives brutal evidence that video layering and CGI was used and the planes cannot be real.

 

Can we promote this video here on the forum? Anyone with a bitchute account can you please like, comment and subscribe the video.

 

I am already getting some hate on from haters/agents/truth deniers whatever you wanna call them.

 

Are you aware that a film called September Clues already did this 13 years ago. It was ripped to pieces but still gets regurgitated every now and again.

 

Video cameras are just not equipped to take pictures of things that move so fast and that distance between each frame - this is just video artefacts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Comedy Time said:

 

Are you aware that a film called September Clues already did this 13 years ago. It was ripped to pieces but still gets regurgitated every now and again.

 

Video cameras are just not equipped to take pictures of things that move so fast and that distance between each frame - this is just video artefacts.

Sure you get artifacts, but that does not mean you should be able to see through the plane. Regardless of whatever the video camera is you cannot see through objects e.g. try with a F1 car, if it is moving fast it cannot and will not go partially invisible at any point in time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, singhz312 said:

Sure you get artifacts, but that does not mean you should be able to see through the plane. Regardless of whatever the video camera is you cannot see through objects e.g. try with a F1 car, if it is moving fast it cannot and will not go partially invisible at any point in time

 

You aren't seeing through anything. You are getting parts that are capturing the motion and parts that are not, leaving behind remnants. F1 cars aren't doing 500 mph.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Comedy Time said:

 

You aren't seeing through anything. You are getting parts that are capturing the motion and parts that are not, leaving behind remnants. F1 cars aren't doing 500 mph.

Erm are you sure about that?

 

image.png.6269b13775b11e5f9a80037845fa2a00.png

 

image.png.f6789f482293d04cd38eca5f809a8acc.png

Are you able to tell me how you can seen through the wing and see the smoke behind the plane?

Do you know anything about video layering?

If you think this is possible why don't you go to the secret services and find the camera man who shot this video as well as his camera, and then tell the secret services you suspect this camera has see through vision, or are you now going to say bin laden has see through planes?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, singhz312 said:

Erm are you sure about that?

 

Erm yes.

 

1 minute ago, singhz312 said:

Are you able to tell me how you can seen through the wing and see the smoke behind the plane?

 

Where are you seeing this? That square bit on the wing?

 

1 minute ago, singhz312 said:

Do you know anything about video layering?

 

Yes.

 

1 minute ago, singhz312 said:

If you think this is possible why don't you go to the secret services and find the camera man who shot this video as well as his camera, and then tell the secret services you suspect this camera has see through vision, or are you now going to say bin laden has see through planes?

 

I admire your constructive strawman, but if you go back one post and read what I said, it should all be clear to you.

 

"You aren't seeing through anything. You are getting parts that are capturing the motion and parts that are not, leaving behind remnants. F1 cars aren't doing 500 mph."

 

I have bolded the bit that confused you.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm it seems like with you 2+2=5, you are trying to tell me that something isn't there when it is... You either aren't that educated in terms of video editing or you are some disinfo perp lol... Good luck trying to tell other people something isn't there when it is... All the best x

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, singhz312 said:

Here, I will make it easier for you 

image.png.3b48ce7cdfd0774ceed6e38ef34abcc8.png

 

Do you mean the square bit? Notice the resolution issues with this? Then the issues associated with capturing such a fast object at 25 frames a second, then the problems associated with converting a video tape to a digital computer file, then the number of times it has been uploaded or shared, then the problems associated with formatting and compression.

 

Are you aware of any of those potential issues? What rectification and checking have you performed on this and what methodology have you applied to the image to discount any of those issues?

 

If there was no plane, where is the original plane and passengers, who mangled and distributed the burnt bodies and sprinkled dna around the area, who distributed the plane parts around New York, how did the explosion go inwards!! and basically that list of bullet points you ignored.

 

I eagerly await your full and detailed rebuttal.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, singhz312 said:

Hmm it seems like with you 2+2=5, you are trying to tell me that something isn't there when it is... You either aren't that educated in terms of video editing or you are some disinfo perp lol... Good luck trying to tell other people something isn't there when it is... All the best x

 

Is that a flounce? You going to ignore my little list?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Comedy Time said:

 

Do you mean the square bit? Notice the resolution issues with this? Then the issues associated with capturing such a fast object at 25 frames a second, then the problems associated with converting a video tape to a digital computer file, then the number of times it has been uploaded or shared, then the problems associated with formatting and compression.

 

Are you aware of any of those potential issues? What rectification and checking have you performed on this and what methodology have you applied to the image to discount any of those issues?

 

If there was no plane, where is the original plane and passengers, who mangled and distributed the burnt bodies and sprinkled dna around the area, who distributed the plane parts around New York, how did the explosion go inwards!! and basically that list of bullet points you ignored.

 

I eagerly await your full and detailed rebuttal.

 

What do you mean plane parts? Man this guy needs to be banned from for forums for spreading misinfo - can you see any plane parts upon the impact in any of the plane impact videos? Why are you lying about such things? Where are the plane parts that are falling from the impact - there are NONE

 

Now as you clearly have not watched my analysis and you are telling me lies and falsities, I don't think there is much point replying to you. Exploding something isn't hard with explosives XD, let me make it simple for you, if you put explosives in the shape of a circle you will get a circular hole. However if you place explosive on an object in the shape of a plane's nose and wings, then you can get a plane shaped crater, hope that makes sense for you although I am not sure as 2+2=5 for you and you are seeing things that others aren't

 

Either you have seen a different 9/11 or I dunno really - or you know you are making lies intentionally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, singhz312 said:

What do you mean plane parts? Man this guy needs to be banned from for forums for spreading misinfo - can you see any plane parts upon the impact in any of the plane impact videos? Why are you lying about such things? Where are the plane parts that are falling from the impact - there are NONE

 

I need to be banned for debating with a newbie raking up shit that has been covered already about a thousand times? Dude, if you really aren't aware of all the bloody plane parts you haven't been very observant. Oh wait......rabugento1.gif

 

7-69_landing-gear-tire_west-rector-s-ful

 

8a47410e385308b8f19c6fe4725d6c38.jpg

 

k2-full.jpg

 

7-70_tire-embedded-wtc1-panel.jpg

 

Plenty more......for anyone who has paid even scant atention.

 

 

31 minutes ago, singhz312 said:

Now as you clearly have not watched my analysis and you are telling me lies and falsities, I don't think there is much point replying to you. 

 

 

I watched your piddly film dude, it's been done before and way better. You missed the boat by 15 years. Lies you say? Those pictures above say you are full of it!

 

31 minutes ago, singhz312 said:

Exploding something isn't hard with explosives XD, let me make it simple for you, if you put explosives in the shape of a circle you will get a circular hole. However if you place explosive on an object in the shape of a plane's nose and wings, then you can get a plane shaped crater, hope that makes sense for you although

 

I said how come the building exterior is blown inwards. Your useless answer doesn't address that. Try again....you may not use the words "magic explosives" though:classic_rolleyes:

 

31 minutes ago, singhz312 said:

I am not sure as 2+2=5 for you and you are seeing things that others aren't

 

Either you have seen a different 9/11 or I dunno really - or you know you are making lies intentionally.

 

I am seeing what the official account says and only YOU seem to dispute that there were plane parts found all over New York!

 

31 minutes ago, singhz312 said:

Either you have seen a different 9/11 or I dunno really - or you know you are making lies intentionally.

 

Or you know fuck all about it and just made yourself look quite clueless.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Comedy Time said:

 

Do you mean the square bit? Notice the resolution issues with this? Then the issues associated with capturing such a fast object at 25 frames a second, then the problems associated with converting a video tape to a digital computer file, then the number of times it has been uploaded or shared, then the problems associated with formatting and compression.

 

Are you aware of any of those potential issues? What rectification and checking have you performed on this and what methodology have you applied to the image to discount any of those issues?

 

If there was no plane, where is the original plane and passengers, who mangled and distributed the burnt bodies and sprinkled dna around the area, who distributed the plane parts around New York, how did the explosion go inwards!! and basically that list of bullet points you ignored.

 

I eagerly await your full and detailed rebuttal.

 

 

Still waiting for an answer.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hahaah I have seen that picture of that same engine posted all over the internet, easily planted off a dump truck. Where are the pieces falling from impact in the videos? The hezerkhani footage is one of the clearest and you can see nothing 

 

 

Don't call me a newbie, you don't know me - in fact I can guarantee I have been researching 9/11 for longer than you

 

I am 99% sure you are an agent. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, singhz312 said:

Guys please support my video on bitchute and like and share if you have an account.. I think it has hit a few nerves of some shills and agents as I don't think anyone has seen much like this before.... Let's get this video out there!!

 

I am 95% sure @Comedy Timis a shill/agent

 

Comedy time is a sceptic, who doesnt believe no planes, not sure his opinion on 911 inside job.

After all thats all what really matters..people get lost in the controlled demo, nukes, DEW & no planes.

All that matters to me is the inside job end of the day & how we have been lied too & terrorised for twenty years.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...