Jump to content

Are the tides turning? Belgian doctors call out government officials


Alisa
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, Alisa said:

Is this a sign the tides are beginning to turn? What are your thoughts? 

 

It's a positive sign in that people are pursuing activism as a way to to address wrongs. Activism can be subverted of course, it's a good idea to know who your allies are.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Alisa said:

Is this a sign the tides are beginning to turn? What are your thoughts?

 

My thoughts are that if a psychopath was hellbent on steering a ship towards the rocks but you were the only person onboard who knew about the plan they wouldn't change course just because you called them out on their plot nor will they change course if you demand it or threaten them

 

You have to convince enough other people on the boat so that there are enough of you to actually remove their hand from the wheel

 

Whilst other people believe them those people may actually see you as the crazy person and prevent you from getting to the wheel

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow amazing article

 

Some quotes

 

The Introduction

 

Open letter from medical doctors and health professionals to all Belgian authorities and all Belgian media.

 

September 5th 2020

We, Belgian doctors and health professionals, wish to express our serious concern about the evolution of the situation in the recent months surrounding the outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. We call on politicians to be independently and critically informed in the decision-making process and in the compulsory implementation of corona-measures. We ask for an open debate, where all experts are represented without any form of censorship. After the initial panic surrounding covid-19, the objective facts now show a completely different picture – there is no medical justification for any emergency policy anymore.
The current crisis management has become totally disproportionate and causes more damage than it does any good.
We call for an end to all measures and ask for an immediate restoration of our normal democratic governance and legal structures and of all our civil liberties
.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote 2

 

It appears that most people already have a congenital or general immunity to e.g. influenza and other viruses. This is confirmed by the findings on the cruise ship Diamond Princess, which was quarantined because of a few passengers who died of Covid-19. Most of the passengers were elderly and were in an ideal situation of transmission on the ship. However, 75% did not appear to be infected. So even in this high-risk group, the majority are resistant to the virus.

A study in the journal Cell shows that most people neutralise the coronavirus by mucosal (IgA) and cellular immunity (T-cells), while experiencing few or no symptoms 14.

Researchers found up to 60% SARS-Cov-2 reactivity with CD4+T cells in a non-infected population, suggesting cross-reactivity with other cold (corona) viruses.15

Most people therefore already have a congenital or cross-immunity because they were already in contact with variants of the same virus.

Edited by jesuitsdidit
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Q3

 

highly contagious virus with millions of deaths without any treatment?

Mortality turned out to be many times lower than expected and close to that of a normal seasonal flu (0.2%). 20
The number of registered corona deaths therefore still seems to be overestimated.
There is a difference between death by corona and death with corona. Humans are often carriers of multiple viruses and potentially pathogenic bacteria at the same time. Taking into account the fact that most people who developed serious symptoms suffered from additional pathology, one cannot simply conclude that the corona-infection was the cause of death. This was mostly not taken into account in the statistics.

The most vulnerable groups can be clearly identified. The vast majority of deceased patients were 80 years of age or older. The majority (70%) of the deceased, younger than 70 years, had an underlying disorder, such as cardiovascular suffering, diabetes mellitus, chronic lung disease or obesity. The vast majority of infected persons (>98%) did not or hardly became ill or recovered spontaneously.

Meanwhile, there is an affordable, safe and efficient therapy available for those who do show severe symptoms of disease in the form of HCQ (hydroxychloroquine), zinc and azithromycin. Rapidly applied this therapy leads to recovery and often prevents hospitalisation. Hardly anyone has to die now.

This effective therapy has been confirmed by the clinical experience of colleagues in the field with impressive results. This contrasts sharply with the theoretical criticism (insufficient substantiation by double-blind studies) which in some countries (e.g. the Netherlands) has even led to a ban on this therapy. A meta-analysis in The Lancet, which could not demonstrate an effect of HCQ, was withdrawn. The primary data sources used proved to be unreliable and 2 out of 3 authors were in conflict of interest. However, most of the guidelines based on this study remained unchanged … 48 49
We have serious questions about this state of affairs.
In the US, a group of doctors in the field, who see patients on a daily basis, united in “America’s Frontline Doctors” and gave a press conference which has been watched millions of times.21 51
French Prof Didier Raoult of the Institut d’Infectiologie de Marseille (IHU) also presented this promising combination therapy as early as April. Dutch GP Rob Elens, who cured many patients in his practice with HCQ and zinc, called on colleagues in a petition for freedom of therapy.22
The definitive evidence comes from the epidemiological follow-up in Switzerland: mortality rates compared with and without this therapy.23

Edited by jesuitsdidit
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Q4

 

From the distressing media images of ARDS (acute respiratory distress syndrome) where people were suffocating and given artificial respiration in agony, we now know that this was caused by an exaggerated immune response with intravascular coagulation in the pulmonary blood vessels. The administration of blood thinners and dexamethasone and the avoidance of artificial ventilation, which was found to cause additional damage to lung tissue, means that this dreaded complication, too, is virtually not fatal anymore. 47

It is therefore not a killer virus, but a well-treatable condition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://docs4opendebate.be/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/white-paper-on-hcq-from-AFD.pdf

 

First 2 pages of 28 page PDF

 

Page 1

 

White Paper on Hydroxychloroquine 

 

Dr SimoneGold, MD, JD www.americasfrontlinedoctors.com  

 

Introduction: General Consensus HCQ is safe………......................................................1  Rheumatologists  Cardiologists  Ophthalmologists Safety Studies ...................................................................................................................4  2000-2020 (twenty years) study  FDA Database (fifty years)  CDC Statement  American Heart Association  Efficacy Studies (sample) ................................................................................................7  February 19, 2020  March 4, 2020  March 20, 2020  March 22, 2020  March 22, 2020  April 11, 2020  April 13, 2020  April 17, 2020  April 21, 2020  April 24, 2020  April 30, 2000  May 15, 2020  May 16, 2020  June 6, 2020  June 20,2020  June 29, 2020  June 29, 2020  June 30, 2020  July 3, 2020 Corruption of the Scientific Journals ..............................................................................10 Corruption of the Media .................................................................................................12 Censorship of the Public “Town Square” & Surgisphere ............……………………..13 Excessive & Punitive Regulations at the State Level & Off-Label Use ........................13 Misstatements at the Federal Level………………………………………………….…15 Why Has HCQ Been Maligned ……………………………….…………………….…19 Implications for the USA if restrictions on HCQ are not lifted immediately……….....21 Conclusion  .....................................................................................................................28   

 

 

Page 2

 

Synopsis: This  white  paper  is  to  draw  the  reader’s  attention  to  the  indisputable  safety  of hydroxychloroquine  (HCQ),  an  analog  of  the  same  quinine  found  in  tree  barks  that  George Washington  used  to  protect  his  troops.  The  modern  version  has  been  FDA  approved  for  65    years,  has  shown  remarkable  efficacy  against  SARS-CoV-2  and  its  use  is  being wrongly  restricted  despite  the  immediate  danger  to  the  American  people  and  the  rest  of  the world.   We  speak  in  support  of  immediately  reversing  the  massive,  irresponsible  disinformation campaign  that  is  literally  preventing  doctors  from  dispensing  HCQ,  advocating  as  well that  it  be  made  available  over  the  counter  in  the  United  States.    This  is  logistically  easy  to do in a  manner that  ensures  the  supply and appropriate  dispensation.    Introduction: The  purpose  of  this  white  paper  is  to  dispassionately  present  the  evidence  regarding  the safety  and  efficacy  of  hydroxychloroquine  and  determine  its  proper  role  in  the  current pandemic.   General  Consensus  that  Hydroxychloroquine  is  Safe Hydroxychloroquine  (HCQ)  has  been  FDA  approved  for  over  65  years  and  has  been  used billions  of  times  throughout  the  entire  world  without  restriction.  For  many  decades  it  has been  given  to:  pregnant  women,  breastfeeding  women,  children,  elderly  patients,  immune compromised patients  and healthy persons.   In  the  USA  it  is  used  most  often  in  three  situations:  systemic  lupus  erythematosus  (SLE), rheumatoid  arthritis  (RA),  and  as  malaria  prophylaxis  for  travelers.  These  three  situations happen to represent  three  different  types  of  populations. Patients  with SLE  are  immune  compromised. Patients  with RA  are  elderly. Travelers  are  younger and typically healthy.   Although  all  doctors  can  and  do  prescribe  HCQ,  because  it  is  most  commonly  used  for SLE  and  RA,  rheumatology  specialists  are  the  physicians  in  America  who  prescribe  it  the most.  Although  it  is  in  the  safest  category  of  medication  and  it  is  virtually  always  safely used,  the  two  most  common  possible  complications  fall  under  the  specialty  of  cardiology and  ophthalmology. So let  us  see  what  these  three  types  of  specialties  say.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...