Could Harry and Meghan be the good guys?

[kj35]

Bear with me. 

 

In the interview last year from the markles African tour Harry did and said something quite telling. When talking about his future he used the words "knowing what I know  ". I thought it was odd at the time but obviously thought along the lines of adenochrome etc...BUT it is obvious given Charles' s latest rants they all know about the great reset. They know about the conovirus. 

 

What if they knew this was coming and wanted no part of the con? They've gone to the US cut a 75 million dollar deal with netflix which will see them be able to live VERY independently.  He is his mother's son. They are vilified in the press ...massively...usually a good sign of an underlying good character. 

 

I'm sure there are narcissistic tendencies on behalf of ms markle...but what if  they want to actually stand up to some of this shit? Am just watching them with interested eyes. 

Edited September 25, 2020 by kj35

[HAARPING_On]

You may actually have a very good point there... 

[Someone2630]

I seem to recall Charlie and his hag, talking about using the military to help combat "Global Warming" (ignoring the fact it's actually going to get colder).

 

A venture into Eugenics with Bill Gates, Kissinger and Soros. Maybe use the military in the UK to "protect the population from the conspiracy theory crackpots" that defy the government by protesting?

 

Maybe start a Global war with America against China, Russia, Iran, Venezuela, Sudan and all the other countries that don't have American puppet governments?

 

That would certainly reduce the population, but I'm afraid that Charlie and his hag will probably not survive "The New Britain" after Bojo and Pratt Hancock are finished.

Edited September 25, 2020 by Someone2630

[Seeker]

No 

[rideforever]

He is a stupid donkey who doesn't know up from down, if you'll remember his Nazi uniform ... what kind of person would do that?  You have to be out of touch of reality.  He's just a ginger fool really, a sitting duck.  She is the woke, the darkness, managing to ensnare one of the royal family is a high prize for the devil.

 

As for Prince Charles ... well, the bottom line is global warming change nonsense has been injected into the eyes of most folks so they live in fear and feeling guilty for being alive ... and frankly few humans can escape.

 

There are no altenatives to an organised hierarchical society so the many forces be they the woke forces, satanists, materialists and truthers who all want to bring it down ... converge and all they will achieve is the destruction of human civilization probably extinction and their own deaths.  As usual !!!

All these groups are exactly the same, the poor out endless miserable criticism of everyone else ... with the idea they know "the truth" ... and when asked what the alternative is, they haven't got one.  That is the NWO, it is foolish people who critciize and provide no alternatives and don't know anything.

 

Most humans do not work constructively towards any higher goals.  They mask their meaninglessness with endless fairy tales about how everyone else is wrong and they have the answer, it's a little narrative they tell themselves as they wait for their death.  Such a story makes you feel good as the coffin is prepared.

 

Edited September 26, 2020 by rideforever

[bamboozooka]

did they get out as they knew what was coming.

the media keep putting out articles pre-empting the fall of the royal family

[ItsTheTruthThough]

Suppose it’s entirely possible. I mean, when you are vilified by the media it’s usually because you are doing something right lol.

[itsnotallrightjack]

Right about what? The pair of them spout woke garbage and go on about climate change etc whilst living in a mansion worth millions.

 

They are tools of the lefty idiot brigade. 

 

 

[itsnotallrightjack]

9 hours ago, Seeker said:

No 

 

Sign of the loser LOL.

 

 

[Grumpy Owl]

On 9/25/2020 at 10:34 AM, kj35 said:

Bear with me. 

 

In the interview last year from the markles African tour Harry did and said something quite telling. When talking about his future he used the words "knowing what I know  ". I thought it was odd at the time but obviously thought along the lines of adenochrome etc...BUT it is obvious given Charles' s latest rants they all know about the great reset. They know about the conovirus. 

 

What if they knew this was coming and wanted no part of the con? They've gone to the US cut a 75 million dollar deal with netflix which will see them be able to live VERY independently.  He is his mother's son. They are vilified in the press ...massively...usually a good sign of an underlying good character. 

 

I'm sure there are narcissistic tendencies on behalf of ms markle...but what if  they want to actually stand up to some of this shit? Am just watching them with interested eyes. 

 

I like your way of thinking. At the time last year when he (Harry) said "knowing what I know" he could have course meant anything.

 

As per what has been documented by Joseph Gregory Hallett, is it possible that he learned that he was not the son of Charles and therefore not actually part of the 'Royal Line'?

 

Was he referring to learning the truth about his mother Princess Diana's 'death'?

 

Or perhaps he was actually referring to what was being planned re: Covid-19 pandemic?

 

Either way, on that basis, one could understand his reasons for not wanting to have anything to do with his 'family'. "Doing the right thing?" It's possible.

 

As for Ms Markle, well I don't really know. She could be a 'disruptor'. But she has made a name for herself now, and is set for life financially.

 

 

[Dawn]

On 9/26/2020 at 6:25 AM, Grumpy Owl said:

 

I like your way of thinking. At the time last year when he (Harry) said "knowing what I know" he could have course meant anything.

 

As per what has been documented by Joseph Gregory Hallett, is it possible that he learned that he was not the son of Charles and therefore not actually part of the 'Royal Line'?

 

Was he referring to learning the truth about his mother Princess Diana's 'death'?

 

Or perhaps he was actually referring to what was being planned re: Covid-19 pandemic?

 

Either way, on that basis, one could understand his reasons for not wanting to have anything to do with his 'family'. "Doing the right thing?" It's possible.

 

As for Ms Markle, well I don't really know. She could be a 'disruptor'. But she has made a name for herself now, and is set for life financially.

 

 

I remember when I heard his, “what I know now” comment I perceived it as being a reference to Diana. He had just gotten married and announced Megan’s pregnancy. Harry seemed like a man that wanted to protect his new family. Like you said, they distanced themselves, became financially independent, and have been slammed by the media. All signs to me that Harry is the best of the brood. 

[Golden Retriever]

On 9/26/2020 at 12:48 PM, itsnotallrightjack said:

Right about what? The pair of them spout woke garbage and go on about climate change etc whilst living in a mansion worth millions.

 

They are tools of the lefty idiot brigade. 

 

 

 

Out of likes

 

"If you don't vote, you don't exist" says Steinem  What a load of crap.

 

And the feminist witch Gloria Steinem ... check her out.

 

 

[Macnamara]

Harry and megans job is to push the woke agenda both sides of the pond

 

They were introduced to each other by a jewish lady misha nonoo

 

As GR shows above megan has been cosying upto marxist thrid wave feminist and CIA asset gloria steinem. See steinem below giving the illuminati handsign:

 

[kj35]

55 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

Harry and megans job is to push the woke agenda both sides of the pond

 

They were introduced to each other by a jewish lady misha nonoo

 

As GR shows above megan has been cosying upto marxist thrid wave feminist and CIA asset gloria steinem. See steinem below giving the illuminati handsign:

 

That's a Barack Obama quote

[Macnamara]

32 minutes ago, kj35 said:

That's a Barack Obama quote

 

i can't edit my post so here is the illuminati handsign again:

 

[Macnamara]

 

[Macnamara]

Gloria Steinem - How The CIA
Used Feminism To Destabilize Society
By Henry Makow, Ph.D. TooGoodReports.com 3-19-2  

"In the 1960´s, the elite media invented second-wave feminism as part of the elite agenda to dismantle civilization and create a New World Order."   Since writing these words last week, I have discovered that before she became a feminist leader, Gloria Steinem worked for the CIA spying on Marxist students in Europe and disrupting their meetings. She became a media darling due to her CIA connections. MS Magazine, which she edited for many years was indirectly funded by the CIA.   Steinem has tried to suppress this information, unearthed in the 1970´s by a radical feminist group called "Red Stockings." In 1979, Steinem and her powerful CIA-connected friends, Katharine Graham of the Washington Post and Ford Foundation President Franklin Thomas prevented Random House from publishing it in "Feminist Revolution." Nevertheless the story appeared in the "Village Voice" on May 21, 1979.   Steinem has always pretended that she had been a student radical. "When I was in college, it was the McCarthy era," she told Susan Mitchell in 1997, "and that made me a Marxist." (Icons, Saints and Divas: Intimate Conversations with Women who Changed the World 1997. p 130) Her bio-blurb in June 1973 MS. Magazine states: "Gloria Steinem has been a freelance writer all her professional life. Ms magazine is her first full-time salaried job."   Not true. Raised in an impoverished, dysfunctional family in Toledo Ohio, Steinem somehow managed to attend elite Smith College, Betty Friedan´s alma mater. After graduating in 1955, Steinem received a "Chester Bowles Student Fellowship" to study in India. Curiously, an Internet search reveals that this fellowship has no existence apart from Gloria Steinem. No one else has received it.   In 1958, Steinem was recruited by CIA´s Cord Meyers to direct an "informal group of activists" called the "Independent Research Service." This was part of Meyer´s "Congress for Cultural Freedom," which created magazines like "Encounter" and "Partisan Review" to promote a left-liberal chic to oppose Marxism. Steinem, attended Communist-sponsored youth festivals in Europe, published a newspaper, reported on other participants, and helped to provoke riots.   One of Steinem´s CIA colleagues was Clay Felker. In the early 1960´s, he became an editor at Esquire and published articles by Steinem which established her as a leading voice for women´s lib. In 1968, as publisher of New York Magazine, he hired her as a contributing editor, and then editor of Ms. Magazine in 1971. Warner Communications put up almost all the money although it only took 25% of the stock. Ms. Magazine´s first publisher was Elizabeth Forsling Harris, a CIA-connected PR executive who planned John Kennedy´s Dallas motorcade route. Despite its anti establishment image, MS magazine attracted advertising from the crème of corporate America. It published ads for ITT at the same time as women political prisoners in Chile were being tortured by Pinochet, after a coup inspired by the US conglomerate and the CIA.   Steinem´s personal relationships also belie her anti establishment pretensions. She had a nine-year relationship with Stanley Pottinger, a Nixon-Ford assistant attorney general, credited with stalling FBI investigations into the assassinations of Martin Luther King, and the ex-Chilean Foreign Minister Orlando Latelier. In the 1980´s, she dated Henry Kissinger. For more details, see San Francisco researcher Dave Emory.   Our main misconception about the CIA is that it serves US interests. In fact, it has always been the instrument of a dynastic international banking and oil elite (Rothschild, Rockefeller, Morgan) coordinated by the Royal Institute for Internal Affairs in London and their US branch, the Council for Foreign Relations. It was established and peopled by blue bloods from the New York banking establishment and graduates of Yale University´s secret pagan "Skull and Bones" society. Our current President, his father and grandfather fit this profile.   The agenda of this international cabal is to degrade the institutions and values of the United States in order to integrate it into a global state that it will direct through the United Nations. In its 1947 Founding Charter, the CIA is prohibited from engaging in domestic activities. However this has never stopped it from waging a psychological war on the American people. The domestic counterpart of the "Congress for Cultural Freedom" was the "American Committee for Cultural Freedom." Using foundations as conduits, the CIA controlled intellectual discourse in the 1950´s and 1960´s, and I believe continues to do so today. In The The Cultural Cold War: The CIA and the World of Arts and Letters, Francis Stonor Saunders estimates that a thousand books were produced under the imprint of a variety of commercial and university presses, with covert subsidies.   The CIA´s "Project Mockingbird" involved the direct infiltration of the corporate media, a process that often included direct takeover of major news outlets. "By the early 1950´s," writes Deborah Davis, in her book Katharine the Great : Katharine Graham and Her Washington Post Empire, the CIA owned respected members of the New York Times, Newsweek, CBS and other communication vehicles, plus stringers, four to six hundred in all." In 1982 the CIA admitted that reporters on the CIA payroll have acted as case officers to agents in the field. Philip Graham, publisher of the Washington Post, who ran the operation until his "suicide" in 1963, boasted that "you could get a journalist cheaper than a good call girl, for a couple of hundred dollars a month."   I was born in 1949. Idealists in my parent´s generation were disillusioned when the Communist dream of universal brotherhood turned out to be a shill for a brutal despotism. My own generation may discover that our best instincts have also been manipulated and exploited. There is evidence that the 60´s drug counter culture, the civil rights movement, and anti-war movement, like feminism, were CIA directed. For example, the CIA has admitted setting up the National Student Association as a front in 1947. In the early 1950´s the NSA opposed the attempts of the House Un American Activities Committee to root out Communist spies. According to Phil Agee Jr., NSA officers participated in the activities of SNCC, the militant civil rights group, and Students for a Democratic Society, a radical peace group.   According to Mark Riebling, the CIA also may have used Timothy Leary. Certainly the agency distributed LSD to Leary and other opinion makers in the 1960s. Leary made a generation of Americans turn away from active participation in society and seek fulfillment "within." In another example of the CIA´s use of drugs to interfere in domestic politics, Gary Webb describes how in the 1980´s, the CIA flooded Black ghettos with cocaine.   I won´t attempt to analyze the CIA´s motivation except to suggest what these acts have in common: They demoralized, alienated and divided Americans. The elite operates by fostering division and conflict in the world. Thus, we don´t realize who the real enemy is. For the same reason, the CIA and elite foundations also fund the diversity and multi cultural movements.   Feminism has done the most damage. There is no more fundamental yet delicate relationship in society than male and female. On it depends the family, the red blood cell of society. Nobody with the interests of society at heart would try to divide men and women. Yet the lie that men have exploited women has become the official orthodoxy.   Man loves woman. His first instinct is to nurture ("husband") and see her thrive. When a woman is happy, she is beautiful. Sure, some men are abusive. But the vast majority have supported and guided their families for millennium.   Feminists relentlessly advance the idea that our inherent male and female characteristics, crucial to our development as human beings, are mere "stereotypes." This is a vicious calumny on all heterosexuals, 95% of the population. Talk about hate! Yet it is taught to children in elementary schools! It is echoed in the media. Lesbians like Rosie O´Donnell are advanced as role models.   All of this is calculated to create personal confusion and sow chaos among heterosexuals. As a result, millions of American males are emasculated and divorced from their relationship to family (the world and the future.) The American woman has been hoodwinked into investing herself in a mundane career instead of the timeless love of her husband and children. Many women have become temperamentally unfit to be wives and mothers. People, who are isolated and alone, stunted and love-starved, are easy to fool and manipulate. Without the healthy influence of two loving parents, so are their children.   Feminism is a grotesque fraud perpetrated on society by its governing elite. It is designed to weaken the American social and cultural fabric in order to introduce a friendly fascist New World Order. Its advocates are sanctimonious charlatans who have grown rich and powerful from it. They include a whole class of liars and moral cripples who work for the elite in various capacities: government, education and the media. These imposters ought to be exposed and ridiculed.   Women´s oppression is a lie. Sex roles were never as rigid as feminists would have us believe. My mother had a successful business in the 1950´s importing watch straps from Switzerland. When my father´s income increased, she was content to quit and concentrate on the children. Women were free to pursue careers if they wanted to. The difference was that their role as wife and mother was understood, and socially validated, as it should be.   Until Gloria Steinem and the CIA came along.     https://rense.com/general21/hw.htm

[Athenry04]

For me they're a pair of twats.

[Macnamara]

Just now, Athenry04 said:

For me they're a pair of twats.

 

they are a pair of twats who fit into the wider conspiracy

[Macnamara]

more deviants at the top of society:

Married multi-millionaire tech firm boss, 52, who attended Harry and Meghan's wedding is charged with rape and four sex assaults

• Lawrence Jones, 52, founded and ran internet hosting company UKFast 
• 'Stepped down' pending internal investigation with his wife Gail left in charge
• He has now been charged with rape and four sex assaults from 2010 to 2013

By William Cole For Mailonline

Published: 14:32, 5 January 2021 | Updated: 15:34, 5 January 2021

A multi-millionaire British tech entrepreneur has been charged with rape and multiple counts of sexual assault.

Lawrence Jones, 52, who is worth £700million and attended Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's wedding, is the founder and former chief executive of UKFast, a cloud computing firm.

The business has previously featured in Sunday Times' lists for 'Best Companies to Work For' and Jones was once branded 'Britain's nicest boss'.

But he took a leave of absence in November 2019 after it was claimed two female employees had accused him of sexual assault and unwanted sexual advances.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9114593/Tech-firm-boss-attended-Harry-Meghans-wedding-charged-rape-four-sex-assaults.html

 

[78ast78dgyad]

On 9/25/2020 at 10:34 AM, kj35 said:

Bear with me. 

 

In the interview last year from the markles African tour Harry did and said something quite telling. When talking about his future he used the words "knowing what I know  ". I thought it was odd at the time but obviously thought along the lines of adenochrome etc...BUT it is obvious given Charles' s latest rants they all know about the great reset. They know about the conovirus. 

 

What if they knew this was coming and wanted no part of the con? They've gone to the US cut a 75 million dollar deal with netflix which will see them be able to live VERY independently.  He is his mother's son. They are vilified in the press ...massively...usually a good sign of an underlying good character. 

 

I'm sure there are narcissistic tendencies on behalf of ms markle...but what if  they want to actually stand up to some of this shit? Am just watching them with interested eyes. 

 

 

It's an interesting idea

 

In every story of good versus evil, in the "evil" group there is always a person who goes against them and exposes them and goes over to the good side

 

is it harry and meghan? maybe.

 

 

[Pabloisawake]

no

[richardrichard]

pair of nauseating vacuous cunts just like the rest of their ilk, good guys indeed...lol.

[78ast78dgyad]

I think I know who saves us.........

 

David Mayer de Rothschild. yes, really.

 

 

He has always seemed like a very normal person who cared about pollution of the world. He even appeared on the Alex Jones show once.

I don't think he would agree to killing off 80% of the world population, 

He doesn't seem to be involved in politics much at all, and he seems to be the only Rothschild who is on youtube and in the mainstream media.

 

 

 

Maybe he is the hidden saviour who goes against evil?

 

 

 

 

[MrM]

The pseudo-left identity politics of the corporate ruling elite allows them to sanctimoniously posture as 'progressive' while doing little of substance. It's cleverly designed to misdirect the masses away from actual revolutionary politics (populist or socialist), which they fear could be dangerous to their rule, and is effective at dividing society up into smaller, weaker and therefore more manageable competing groups.

 

If Harry and Meghan are doing anything it's purely enlightened self-interest, they are only perusing a path that many rich and powerful people do to maintain their positions of privilege in society.