Jump to content

PCR testing - VERY IMPORTANT to look at this


Concerned Citizen

Recommended Posts

 

IMPORTANT

Now that the death numbers are SO LOW the emphasis is being put on the pcr test numbers that are being given as positive.

This is how the scare tactics are being continued then bringing the following set of links (there are three that I have put on here) to peoples attention is ABSOLUTELY VITAL.

IF YOU FEEL THAT THIS INFORMATION is VALID then PLEASE PASS ON and SHARE.

I welcome any comments relating to the validity of the information contained within these links. Like everyone else I am just after getting nearer the truth.

The third link has other aspects that some may wish to expand upon. eg LOCKDOWN deaths and "HANGING on by their Finger Nails".

Link 1.

An article that appeared in the NEW YORK TIMES (29th August 2020)

Your Coronavirus Test Is Positive. Maybe It Shouldn’t Be. - The New York Times

 

Link 2

An American News Network video talking about that article in the New York Times (2nd Sept. 2020)

Bombshell Report: 90% of Positive COVID-19 Tests Should Be Negative - YouTube

 

Link 3

The week in 60 minutes with Andrew Neil – 3 September 2020 | Event | The Spectator TV

REFERRING to this link which is to a very recent 3rd Sept. 2020 VIDEO BROADCAST by ANDREW NEIL – This week in 60 minutes.

Andrew Neil begins with talking about cases (from testing) and has Fraser Nelson talking about cases (from tests) and people admitted to hospitals.

Later he has Professor CARL HENEGHAN (around 6mins 30secs)

Prof. Refers to the consequence of Lockdown causing many deaths.

He then refers to year BEFORE (i.e. 2019) having about 15,000 less deaths from usual flu deaths and “HANGING on by THEIR FINGERNAILS”.

In particular at around 14 mins he refers to pcr test and the AMPLIFICATION aspect.

He refers to a “CYCLE THRESHOLD” of 25 – this is much lower than the threshold level of 35 mentioned in other links AND MANY MANY more times LESS than the 37 to 40 cycles used.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ministers and experts sombrely announcing increases in the number of cases as a precursor for more social engineering when the relevance of the testing is zero.

 

One might as well test for flu or the commom cold this Winter and make solemn pronouncements about the results.

 

Experts say the virus is airborne and can be mitigated by mask wearing.

 

Ok then!

 

So rather than use a test based on amplification why not get subjects to breath through a sterile mask into a sterile medium, analyse those and see what actually is transmitting and in what concentrations in the real world?

Edited by serpentine
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Concerned Citizen said:

 

IMPORTANT

Now that the death numbers are SO LOW the emphasis is being put on the pcr test numbers that are being given as positive.

This is how the scare tactics are being continued then bringing the following set of links (there are three that I have put on here) to peoples attention is ABSOLUTELY VITAL.

IF YOU FEEL THAT THIS INFORMATION is VALID then PLEASE PASS ON and SHARE.

I welcome any comments relating to the validity of the information contained within these links. Like everyone else I am just after getting nearer the truth.

The third link has other aspects that some may wish to expand upon. eg LOCKDOWN deaths and "HANGING on by their Finger Nails".

Link 1.

An article that appeared in the NEW YORK TIMES (29th August 2020)

Your Coronavirus Test Is Positive. Maybe It Shouldn’t Be. - The New York Times

 

Link 2

An American News Network video talking about that article in the New York Times (2nd Sept. 2020)

Bombshell Report: 90% of Positive COVID-19 Tests Should Be Negative - YouTube

 

Link 3

The week in 60 minutes with Andrew Neil – 3 September 2020 | Event | The Spectator TV

REFERRING to this link which is to a very recent 3rd Sept. 2020 VIDEO BROADCAST by ANDREW NEIL – This week in 60 minutes.

Andrew Neil begins with talking about cases (from testing) and has Fraser Nelson talking about cases (from tests) and people admitted to hospitals.

Later he has Professor CARL HENEGHAN (around 6mins 30secs)

Prof. Refers to the consequence of Lockdown causing many deaths.

He then refers to year BEFORE (i.e. 2019) having about 15,000 less deaths from usual flu deaths and “HANGING on by THEIR FINGERNAILS”.

In particular at around 14 mins he refers to pcr test and the AMPLIFICATION aspect.

He refers to a “CYCLE THRESHOLD” of 25 – this is much lower than the threshold level of 35 mentioned in other links AND MANY MANY more times LESS than the 37 to 40 cycles used.

You cannot call a "case" an actual "case" unless the patient has SYMPTOMS. It's ALWAYS been like this. until these arseholes decided to hoodwink everyone and you all keep falling for it. 

 

The cycle threshold is MEANINGLESS if you "Test" someone who is perfectly healthy. Whether he / she / it tests positive or not is MEANINGLESS. How many times do people have to keep on having to repeat this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

“In one paper,” Crowe says, “I found 37 cycles. If you didn’t get enough fluorescence by 37 cycles, you are considered negative. In another, paper, the cutoff was 36. Thirty-seven to 40 were considered “indeterminate.” And if you got in that range, then you did more testing. I’ve only seen two papers that described what the limit was. So, it’s quite possible that different hospitals, different States, Canada versus the US, Italy versus France are all using different cutoff sensitivity standards of the Covid test. So, if you cut off at 20, everybody would be negative. If you cut off a 50, you might have everybody positive.”

 

http://stateofthenation.co/?p=11173

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ARTIFACTS IN RT-PCR TESTS

 

This was not easy to find.  The lab testing industry is concealing some very dangerous things that happen in rt-pcr tests.

 

The rt-pcr test slices and recombines strands of RNA.  But it also makes errors along the way.
When you are dealing with millions of RNA strands in a test tube and slice and dice them, errors are created.  This means different combinations of RNA are produced that were not in the original sample.


As a simple example, a piece of RNA with the code ABC is copied a million times in during the test, and so you have a million ABC strands in the test tube afterwards.  But you will also have artifacts.  You will have a few copies of ABB, a few CAB ... that were created accidentally by the test.
These accidental RNA strands are called "artifacts".  They were created by accident by the slicing and dicing that happens in the rt-pcr technique.

And it creates RNA that was not in the original sample.

 

This is one reason why doing tests with many amplification cycles produces false positives, because after so many cycles you will have many many artifacts .. random RNA created by mistake.  Now consider this, say you do 30 amplification cycles.  In the first cycle you create some random artifacts by mistake, and then you do the 2nd cycle which creates millions of copies of everything in the test tube.  But you are creating millions of copies of the random RNA that the test made by mistake in the 1st cycle.  Rinse and repeat for 30 cycles ... and you have a test tube with a hell of lot of errors in it.
 

This is why if you do more than say 30 amplification cycles you have so many bits of random RNA in the test tube that you will test positive for CV19 even if you don't have it.  In fact you will test positive for every virus in the world because the test itself generates random RNA.

 

What are amplification cycles  ?   How the test works is they have  a test tube with mucus from somebody's nose, in it is the patient's RNA. 

On that sample the lab will run maybe 30 amplification cycles and after that it will check to see if CV19 is in the test tube.

Each cycle multiplies whatever is in the test tube by millions.  This is done to make testing easier so that even minute quantities can be detected.  And the labs do maybe 30x amplification cycles to increase the amount of material they have to make detection easier.  After they do the 30 cycles then they do the test to see what's in the test tube, to check to see if CV19 is in there.

But ... like I said, the cycles slice and dice RNA and create some errors, they create random RNA and so if you do more than about 35 cycles you have so much random RNA in there you will test positive for every disease under the Sun.

 

The labs do not talk about this for obvious reasons.

 

MAKING RANDOM VIRUSES

Something that is very dangerous is that this technique is actually making random viruses by slicing and dicing people's RNA.  And because so many people are tested every day, millions of people, millions of tests, millions of slicing and dicing millions of errors ... there is a good chance that a very bad virus will be created.

This test is not really a test at all.

It was designed by an American scientist to create copies of RNA.  That's all the procedure was a way of creating lots of RNA from a small sample, it was never intended to be used as a test.

And now for some pictures.  In this picture the red RNA strand is a copy of the blue one.  But sometimes the slicing and dicing goes wrong and the red one is not like the blue one at all, it is an artifact or something new that was not in the original sample.

 

tttttt.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MANY THANKS for comments so far. Not trying to single out any of them but good of rideforever to spend the time and effort in putting together their responses. 

 

IN VIEW of todays (Monday 6th Sept.) figs. and yesterdays (Sun 6th Sept.) death numbers of 3 and 2 (what a catastrophe eh!!!!) and the announcement from Prat Handcock to the LOCKDOWN measures needed because of the rising "case" numbers, the IMPORTANCE of the FALSENESS of this test needs to be brought to more peoples attention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More Secrets in the RT-PCR Test

The newspapers have got wind that this test is very sensitive and so you might get a false positive.

But if they continue to dig into the details of this test some quite shocking revelations will be learnt:

 

1. The test creates random strands of RNA that may match the virus code and give a false positive when the patient does not have the virus at all.  This is not because the test is sensitive but because the way the test works by slicing and recombining RNA creates every so often random errors where the wrongs bits of RNA are joined together creating new strands with a random code ... and a code that was not in the original patient, and a code that might match the virus's code.  When you are doing this will millions of strands of RNA, eventually you have so much random RNA in the test tube that it will test positive for every virus known to man.
The newspapers haven't worked this out yet.

 

2. Kary Mullis the scientist who developed this test said something incredible.  He said that inside a sample from a patient are huge amounts of different RNA and DNA strands.  The human body is not a clean place it is absolutely rammed full of RNA/DNA from all sorts of things, half eaten viruses, inactive viruses, part of the of the body ... huge amounts of things inside the body.

Which then begs the question ... why are you looking for a particular bad piece of RNA when the entire body is full of bad RNA.  You probably carry thousands of bits of viruses inside you right now, inactive or active, alive or dead.  It's all in your body now.

 

Which begs the question, why can your body carry so much random pathological material and not get ill?

What is holding the body together with so much "dirt" inside it?

The Viral Labs name their tests groovy names like ... SuperX Corona Detector 3.1 ... and they like to impress Governments that they will KILL the bad guy.  Which is about as much as human beings understand.

Everybody wants to kill the bad guy just like in a Western movie.

 

I wonder if the real truth about medicine is that if your doctor tells you that you are going to die ... then your body just complies with the message.  If he says you are going to live then your body complies.  I think that's a possibility or at least plays a big part.

Clearly our bodies are full of filth and we can be super health ... what we call medicine is highly questionnable.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My grandfather used to tell me of a test that a group of doctors carried out in the later part of the 1800's.

 

They put a healthy (well, mildly sick person) in a ward. They put a bucket under the bed with water very slowly dripping into it. Then several doctors would stand at the bottom of the bed and whisper about his condition, just loud enough that her could hear it. They would shake their heads and basically say that the guy was bleeding out and that he probably wouldn't last more than a day or two.

 

Another REALLY sick patient was also set up in the same way, but this time, the whispers were that he was almost recovered and they should be able to send him home in a few days.

 

Surprise, surprise. The really sick guy, slowly recovered and the poor sod who wasn't really ill, died within a week. I heard this story several times. My grandfather wasn't the sort of man who would make up stories for the sake of it.

 

MIND OVER MATTER - Bushido. Ki or Chi.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can just see a graduate doing this rt pcr test getting some awkward questions ... and they quickly make up excuses.  It's pretty sad.  education is most about ... well what is that parents want?  That their kids are on an income stream?  That they will make enough to have a house and family.

Truth is not something many people can afford.

I have had many experiences of doctors/dentists/scientists saying things that are outright lies or untrue, consciously or unconsciously.

But then again ... maybe the roots of these ugly situations is that people are no longer discoverers who do things with their own hands from the ground up.  Like buildings a ship from trees you felled yourself, so you know everything about it, you have deep 360degree experience and the scars to show it.  You have earned your knowledge.

No, for most people and perhaps it's always like this ...  most people are taught to repeat words, fancy sounding words, and keep the money coming in and get a lapel pin saying "expert".   Monkey on a stool.

Such is life, life on Earth is full of difficult choices.  Maybe if you act like the fool they want you to be Monday to Friday and then go to church on Sunday that was a kind of system where you could be fed and still not lose your soul ... which is a neat trick down here.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Found It

Wow this information is difficult to find and not widely advertised, in the RT-PCR test the test itself causes mutations of the genetic material in the test and these mutations or "artifacts" are randomly generated RNA that can test positive for CV19 even thought it was not in the original sample, but generated by mistake by the random mutations in the test.

It's actually on this wiki page under "Limitations" ...

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymerase_chain_reaction#Limitations

 

"Like all enzymes, DNA polymerases are also prone to error, which in turn causes mutations in the PCR fragments that are generated."

 

An example of artifacts giving false positives for leukaemia patients

 

Our study demonstrates that PCR artifacts may mimic BCR-ABL1 compound mutations, leading to inaccurate assessment of mutation status, which could have serious clinical consequences for patients. We urge caution when interpreting results using current procedures and call for new techniques to more reliably detect compound mutations and differentiate them from multiple polyclonal mutations. 

 

https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/124/1/153/33110/Many-BCR-ABL1-compound-mutations-reported-in

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...