Stonehenge solved?

[amy G]

Has anyone else been down this path?

 

I find it just amazing what they can do with our history and our science.

 

 

 

 

[screamingeagle]

Carl Munck explanation is better and he has evidence.....in the video called "The Code"

[amy G]

2 minutes ago, screamingeagle said:

Carl Munck explanation is better and he has evidence.....in the video called "The Code"

I'm not familiar with him or the video you mentioned. Any cliffs?

[screamingeagle]

28 minutes ago, amy G said:

I'm not familiar with him or the video you mentioned. Any cliffs?

you can find it on ytb but it's a 5.5 hours long 

i'll try to find a bit about stonehenge,latter 

[Grumpy Owl]

I came across an interesting book last year:

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Ancient-Knowledge-George-Curtis-ebook/dp/B0067MDMMI/ref=tmm_kin_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=&sr=

 

I won't spoil it too much for anyone interested in reading it, but the author combines some reinterpretation of 'Genesis' from the Bible with some advanced mathematics, and concludes that Stonehenge is actually the 'Tower Of Babel' and its layout is an accurate mathematical model of our solar system.

 

I'm not entirely convinced, but it was still an entertaining read.

[screamingeagle]

Carl Munck - The Code part 1/27

talk about SH is at about 3.30

[Coldrum]

Stonehenge has had major reconstructions since 1900

The masons got to it and restored it in their own image 

 

William Stukeley English Antiquarian 

 

Edited September 6, 2020 by Coldrum

[Lore]

Existing evidence of historical writings and legends of Stonehenge:-

Gildas wrote about Stonehenge in the 6th century and in the 7th century Aneurin believed it to be the work of giants. In the 9th century, Nennius suggested it was a stone memorial for Britons who were treacherously slain and it was then called Stanhengues which meant ‘hanging stones’.

 

It was Geoffrey of Monmouth, an 11th century Welsh monk, who wrote about Stonehenge in his ‘History of the Kings of Britain’, who was the main source of the legends of Stonehenge. He theorised that the 3rd century king, Aurelius Ambrosius drove out invading Saxons, restored cities and churches that had been destroyed and then decided to set up a memorial for those who had died. He allegedly selected skilled craftsmen to erect a building that would stand forever and Merlin seemed best suited for the task as he could foretell the future and devise ‘engines of artiface’. Merlin suggested that Ambrosius send for the ‘Dance of the Giants’, a ring of large stones with magical qualities that stood on a mountainside in Ireland, brought there from the furthest ends of Africa by giants of old. Uther Pendragon, the king’s brother and Merlin took 18,000 men to Ireland to fetch the stones. They tried to move them with huge hawsers, ropes and scaling ladders unsuccessfully, but Merlin ‘put together his own engines’ and lightly dismantled the stones. Whence they were taken by ship to Salisbury Plain where Merlin set them up in a circle as they had stood on Mount Killare.

 

Merlin was most likely brought into the story by Geoffrey as the only conceivable means of explaining the existence of Stonehenge. However, although it is generally accepted that the bluestones came from the Prescelly mountains in Wales, they can also be found in Ireland and nowhere else...

[amy G]

4 hours ago, Coldrum said:

Stonehenge has had major reconstructions since 1900

The masons got to it and restored it in their own image 

This is the story freemasons tell today, but what evidence is there that this structure ever existed prior to 1900?

[zArk]

English use yards which is a measurement used to construct stonehenge and pyramids which ralph ellis names the thoth rod

 

The designers measurement system os so sacred it survives today in modern architecture.

[oddsnsods]

On 9/6/2020 at 12:51 PM, amy G said:

Has anyone else been down this path?

 

Yes it was debunked to death years ago on the old forum, why are you bringing it up now I wonder?

 

All your posts seem to be aimed at discrediting this forum in your short stay..why dont you actually try researching anything first?

[Truthspoon]

Maybe it used to be a huge mound with stone supported chambers....and the stones we see now are only its skeleton.

 

This is the case with many such Dolmens of the ancient world.

 

What we see is only the stone support of what was supposedly an earthen mound tomb.

 

 

 

 

Edited September 7, 2020 by Truthspoon

[amy G]

21 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

 

Yes it was debunked to death years ago on the old forum, why are you bringing it up now I wonder?

 

All your posts seem to be aimed at discrediting this forum in your short stay..why dont you actually try researching anything first?

Hey, you are the guy who posts the memes in the "nature of reality" forum, from a known nasa shill who was exposed years ago. And now this? Maybe you are here to simply shut down legitimate discussion?

 

I only began reading this forum a short time prior to it being shut down. I never read that post. I did not know it existed. Perhaps you could elaborate with evidence that stonehenge was built prior to the when the freemsaons built it in the 1900s with cranes.

 

As far a discrediting this forum, I find that funny. While my eyes and my mind have just opened recently to so many new and incredible ideas which I previously could never have believed, I have been in the truth/activist community for a long time. One thing that I have come to realize is that all "real truthers" have something in common. When they learn of facts, they don't care which way that truth leads. If they are forced to abandon a long standing belief in the face of new information, sobeit. I am quite sure that Mr. Icke would knows this simple truth as well.

 

I have mentioned already that I am not here to argue with anyone. I am really just looking for the truth.

 

 

 

[oddsnsods]

 

19 minutes ago, amy G said:

Hey, you are the guy who posts the memes in the "nature of reality" forum, from a known nasa shill who was exposed years ago. And now this?

 

Yet you take the words of mason Byrd seriously. I dont give a rats if hes the Duke of Kent..if he brings facts to the table. You should check out his site, totally annihilates all the garbage parroted on here.

 

19 minutes ago, amy G said:

 

I never read that post. I did not know it existed. Perhaps you could elaborate with evidence that stonehenge was built prior to the when the freemsaons built it in the 1900s with cranes.

 

You never take the time to go look for counter evidence to your wild theories.

 

19 minutes ago, amy G said:

 

 While my eyes and my mind have just opened recently to so many new and incredible ideas which I previously could never have believed, I have been in the truth/activist community for a long time.

 

Write a book & call it flat cola.

 

19 minutes ago, amy G said:

 

One thing that I have come to realize is that all "real truthers" have something in common. When they learn of facts, they don't care which way that truth leads.

 

 Like the size of Antarctica compared with the USA.

 

Real truthers dont just parrot any old shit they come across.

 

 

 

[Lore]

3 hours ago, amy G said:

 Perhaps you could elaborate with evidence that stonehenge was built prior to the when the freemsaons built it in the 1900s with cranes.

Ok, apart from the evidence of Stonehenge being written about since the 6th century...

Inigo Jones was commissioned by James I to investigate Stonehenge and subsequently published his findings in ’The Most Notable Antiquity of Great Britain’ in 1655. John Aubrey (1626-1697) discovered the ring of holes containing cremated human bones, towards the outer edge of the site, his hand written manuscript of the 1660’s, is in the Bodleian Library, Oxford.

The illustration below is from the book Beyond Stonehenge by Gerald S. Hawkins and is the “Earliest known perspective of Stonehenge; from a Dutch manuscript, 1574”.

 

The video posted above by Coldrum, ‘Stonehenge under Construction’ shows realignments to the site carried out in the 1950’s;  because over millennia (the Bluestones were put in place around 1,750bce) many of the stones had fallen, broken, were destroyed or missing and the original shape was incomprehensible to the increasing number of visitors.

[amy G]

23 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

You never take the time to go look for counter evidence to your wild theories.

Not true at all and your debunking site proves nothing. You have no idea when the Constable drawings were done, just what you have been told. I cold have done those sketches.

 

The rest of your post attempts to move flat earth into the discussion which is a common technique used by those who wish to stifle legitimate debate.

 

 

21 hours ago, Lore said:

Ok, apart from the evidence of Stonehenge being written about since the 6th century...

Inigo Jones was commissioned by James I to investigate Stonehenge and subsequently published his findings in ’The Most Notable Antiquity of Great Britain’ in 1655. John Aubrey (1626-1697) discovered the ring of holes containing cremated human bones, towards the outer edge of the site, his hand written manuscript of the 1660’s, is in the Bodleian Library, Oxford.

The illustration below is from the book Beyond Stonehenge by Gerald S. Hawkins and is the “Earliest known perspective of Stonehenge; from a Dutch manuscript, 1574”.

 

The video posted above by Coldrum, ‘Stonehenge under Construction’ shows realignments to the site carried out in the 1950’s;  because over millennia (the Bluestones were put in place around 1,750bce) many of the stones had fallen, broken, were destroyed or missing and the original shape was incomprehensible to the increasing number of visitors.

Sorry, but again, you have no way to confirm these dates.

 

As far as the evidence goes, the structure appears to have been created in the last century by freemasons to worship their sun god.

 

If this truly were 1000s of years old, there would be countless drawings, paintings, and personal journals telling of this great structure, yet this is not the case.

[Truthspoon]

Freemasons don't worship the sun.

 

 

[oddsnsods]

 

 

1875 Photoshop.

 

2 hours ago, amy G said:

Not true at all and your debunking site proves nothing. You have no idea when the Constable drawings were done, just what you have been told. I cold have done those sketches.

 

Theres tons of paintings & sketches.

So you are saying these masons chiselled out tons of rock, then weathered & made them look like ruins from an ancient structure for tourism?

Accounts dating back to the twelfth century mention this mason tourist scam.

 

2 hours ago, amy G said:

 

The rest of your post attempts to move flat earth into the discussion which is a common technique used by those who wish to stifle legitimate debate.

 

Its not debate, you just grab some photos of renovations, its mud flood shite.

 

2 hours ago, amy G said:

If this truly were 1000s of years old, there would be countless drawings, paintings, and personal journals telling of this great structure, yet this is not the case.

.

If you bothered to search

 

 

 

 

[amy G]

I guess you're one of them. A few pieces of easily hoaxable evidence that no one outside of the hoaxers is allowed to examine or know the history of is simply not good enough.

 

You have a nice day and I'll continue to wonder about the mountains of evidence that should have piled up since antiquity.

[Red pill taken]

Have you watched The nick kollerstrom video over on the moon thread? He touches on stone henge

[Tom bombadil]

Stone henge is not a henge.

 

It has stones in it.

 

It was to be the foundations of a large man made hill.  

 

Look inside some of the larger constructions and we see the same set up.  After a time someone would be entombed inside.

 

Yes it has been fiddled with over time but to me it looks like a strange group playing on a building site and putting meaning to all the scaffolding. ...nuts

[Coldrum]

Full Movie ,Standing with Stone's

 

[karmaxxxx]

All i know on this monument is that some years back, the time team i think did an xray of the surrounding area and found more artifacts buried in a bigger circle than stonehenge.

but the kicker here is that these other artifacts where made of wood. they could not i believe do a full survey one land permissions and two theirs a bloody road running through the site.

but the actual site is far far bigger than just these stones. thats about all i know lol

[karmaxxxx]

 

[Tom bombadil]

That's right.

 

There are other stone configurations on the way to the main site.  It's a lovely walk.