Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So the Snake River Canyon cuts through a few mountain ranges and rocks cracking has nothing to do with it?  Are you the main poster on this site??

You do know the African Rift is a point that is getting wider, Right? Check out this vid from NAS that show how out to lunch they are. The Red Sea and Dead Sea are also on an expanding rift but this slice of African if floating around like it was a rubber duck in a fast flowing river. O;17 is where the laughing begins. This is from the smartest scientists in the world at present. All hope is lost.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 130
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Just read the book Gregory pecary put the link up for,( cheers for that)  well recommended.    Agreed they make a compelling case.   Now where did I park my Dolorean. 

We have over 80 pages of the flat earth thread then in the space section with regards to the gravity error it was turned into a flat earth thread and now when we are trying to have a logical discussio

Posted Images

I'm watching it right now. Looks like wishful thinking rather than hard science.  At what point of the vid do you think they make their strongest case just to show me you understand it it as the way you presented it. 'Here, you figure it out' is what a troll does. From my POV they are playing with a table and a saw and calling it science.

 

What kind of electric storms would a vaporized core of iron produce?

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Wayfaring Stranger said:

I'm watching it right now. Looks like wishful thinking rather than hard science. 

so to you experimental evidence is wishful thinking?

 

2 minutes ago, Wayfaring Stranger said:

At what point of the vid do you think they make their strongest case just to show me you understand it it as the way you presented it.

electric discharges form lichtenberg structures, soil accumulates along the edge of the discharge through ionic deposition, the water flows along the discharge channel keeping it clear

 

6 minutes ago, Wayfaring Stranger said:

'Here, you figure it out' is what a troll does.

no, thats what any good teacher does, if you dont figure it out no one will figure it out for you

 

7 minutes ago, Wayfaring Stranger said:

What kind of electric storms would a vaporized core of iron produce?

this kind of word salad nonsense question seems to be your speciality

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually a teacher tells the students what page to open their books to.

What about magma rubbing against itself, no electrical charge involved. An atmosphere of vaporized metal would create electrical storms the same was water clouds do.

You do know that a material does not go back to being a solid after it is in a liquid state and more heat is applied, . .  Right?

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Wayfaring Stranger said:

Actually a teacher tells the students what page to open their books to.

well my wife will be glad to hear it, she has been teaching the hard way for a while now, i will tell her she just needs to know some page numbers

 

4 minutes ago, Wayfaring Stranger said:

What about magma rubbing against itself, no electrical charge involved.

well thats fluid dynamics so not the same as rubbing a balloon in your hair

 

5 minutes ago, Wayfaring Stranger said:

An atmosphere of vaporized metal would create electrical storms the same was water clouds do.

an atmosphere of vaporized anything is called a plasma, clouds come from storms not the other way around

 

7 minutes ago, Wayfaring Stranger said:

You do know that a material does not go back to being a solid after it is in a liquid state and more heat is applied, . .  Right?

not always true, liquid metallic hydrogen forms a lattice that is "solid", but so what?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your vid requires an electrical charge that is not possible as the arc would  happen soon that the charge needed to create any large crater. The frozen sea on Pluto is full of circular marks. The core shrinking and the ice being pulled in to take up the room is how something expands and shrinks without the electric universe being part of it.

The scarring always gets deeper the lower the elevation is while a bolt from above its the tallest parts rather than the lowest.

When the earth was covered with ice that helped the core get hotter rather than colder.  Ice has a + R-value so over time the build up in pressure will crack the crust and the ice covering and magma will flow out like it was coming out of a broken pressure cooker. All without the huge bolts that are now missing entirely while we have 40.000 miles of active rifts that is moving due to heat at the core. That is as frail as sunspots causing climate change all the way to major ice-ages.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Wayfaring Stranger said:

Your vid requires an electrical charge that is not possible as the arc would  happen soon that the charge needed to create any large crater.

nonsense, interplanetary discharges would last several minutes to years depending on the vectors of the bodies, plus many of the craters on the moon were formed quickly during one of the suns nova events, a large CME could cause massive discharges all over the surface of the moon for hours at a minimum

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yet nobody in the history of the world has seen the moon get struck by 'lightening'. You missed that part about my comment of the shifting core of the moon being the cause for all the marks on the far side of the moon. That just means only your posts are important in your world. I'll let you keep that delusion.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Wayfaring Stranger said:

Yet nobody in the history of the world has seen the moon get struck by 'lightening'. 

you seem pretty sure about something you cannot know

 

3 minutes ago, Wayfaring Stranger said:

You missed that part about my comment of the shifting core of the moon being the cause for all the marks on the far side of the moon.

i didnt miss it, its just impossible so i ignored it

 

5 minutes ago, Wayfaring Stranger said:

That just means only your posts are important in your world. I'll let you keep that delusion.

actually, the fact that you are cheesed off because i ignored your nonsense post makes it seem like you are the one who is deluded

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Wayfaring Stranger said:

Time for troll posts but nothing on theories.

theory: electric discharges are the cause of large shallow craters on the moon and elsewhere

 

i have provided experimental evidence to back it up

 

where is your evidence to the contrary?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Wayfaring Stranger said:

It fits with the vid about stretch marks on the moon that I posted earlier

so you think the moon has fault lines and continents?

 

2 minutes ago, Wayfaring Stranger said:

You never replied to the point about the core shifting and the marks on the far side about any of them being sink holes or not.

ATTENTION, HERE IS MY REPLY, THE CONCEPT IS HOGWASH AND SCIENTIFICALLY UNTENABLE, HENCE I IGNORED IT

Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, Wayfaring Stranger said:

If the scarring on Mars and the Earth is electrical are there any marks on the moon (4k vid if possible) that  match what are 'watershed marks' on earth or like the Grand Canyon

the posted video has enough evidence,the fact that you call experiments "wishful thinking" say a lot

 

Mod note

pleas ton down and stick to the topic

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Wayfaring Stranger said:

If the scarring on Mars and the Earth is electrical are there any marks on the moon (4k vid if possible) that  match what are 'watershed marks' on earth or like the Grand Canyon

there is no flowing water on the moon, so looking for "watershed marks" will be fruitless

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

etymologically Sin = moon 

Sin is also used to represent time as sine and cosine .

Those responsible for the formation of the modern King James Bible version of English have on purpose left esoteric clues everywhere .

Demons 

De = god

Mon = moon

So it looks like David is correct that the moon is in some way a piece of tech in collaboration with Saturn with the purpose of time perception .

Probably the Torah and other ancient so called religious texts are more likely an instruction manual or user guide that quantum physics has only just got a grasp on ..

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/2/2021 at 7:18 AM, AnarchicBreeze said:

The moon is a lightly dusted ball of salt water ice with a magnetised metalic core...

What evidence can you put up to validate that statement?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...