Jump to content

Electric Universe - A New Paradigm


Recommended Posts

Introduction

 

In the wake of recent discoveries, a new way of seeing the physical universe is emerging. The new vantage point emphasizes the role of electricity in space and shows the negligible contribution of gravity in cosmic events.

Images returned by high-powered telescopes and recent space probes have challenged astronomers’ long-standing assumptions about galaxies and their constituent stars, about the evolution of our solar system, and about the nature and history of Earth.

The new discoveries also suggest that our early ancestors may have witnessed awe inspiring electrical events in the heavens—the source of myths and symbols around the world.

Cosmology

Today, magnetic fields are detected everywhere, even in the “empty” depths of intergalactic space. Magnetic fields cannot exist without causative electric currents. The naked electric force is 39 orders of magnitude (a thousand billion billion billion billion times) stronger than gravity. The visible universe is constituted almost entirely of electrically active plasma.

In the twentieth-century, the pioneers of plasma science inspired a new school of investigation called plasma cosmology. Plasma cosmologists suggest that electricity is the primary force organizing spiral galaxies and the astonishing galactic clusters now seen in deep space.

Plasma cosmology has achieved surprising success in predicting major discoveries of the space age. This new perspective does not require purely theoretical inventions based on mathematical assumptions like the Big Bang, dark matter, dark energy, neutron stars, or Black Holes.

Stars

An Electric Universe extends the findings of plasma cosmology to the formation and evolution of stars and their planetary satellites. Stars are formed at the intersections of galactic current filaments in dusty space plasma. The size of a star and its color are determined electrically and may change suddenly. Novae and supernovae are the explosive response of stars to a power surge in their galactic circuit.

Proponents of the Electric Universe suggest that there are no isolated islands in the universe. All objects in space, from subatomic particles to galactic clusters, are connected by manifestations of the electric force acting in real-time.

The Standard Model of the Sun proposes that pressure at the core of the Sun provokes a thermonuclear reaction. Proponents of this model say that this thermonuclear furnace causes the Sun to shine.

The Electric Sun Model, on the other hand, envisions thermonuclear reactions and neutrino production at or close to the surface of the Sun where the maximum exchange between the Sun and its external environment occurs.

It is electricity that energizes the stars, including the Sun, in a form of glow discharge. This external power source explains why the temperature of the Sun increases above the photosphere to coronal temperatures of 2 million degrees. Powerful plasma feedback effects maintain a steady output of visible solar radiation while variations in power input show up in the familiar sunspot cycle.

It is in the nature of a glow discharge that all stars possess a weak electric field beyond the corona. As charged particles of the solar wind move away from the Sun, they continue to be accelerated due to the Sun’s electric field, which extends to the heliopause.

Watch Scientists Claim Discovery “Confirms” Standard Solar Model for more information on the differences between the two stellar models.

Comets

Comets are electrically charged bodies moving on elliptical orbits through the Sun’s interplanetary electric field. As it approaches the Sun, the comet’s swift radial movement  develops arcing on the nucleus. The arcs produce jets of dust and ions that form the coma and visible tails.

Many comets are solid rocks with dry surfaces. The sharply defined features of comet nuclei make clear that they are not “dirty snowballs” sublimating in the Sun. Due to the electric force, a comet can entrain a mass of hydrogen from the Sun greater than the mass of the comet’s nucleus. The unexpected X-rays of a cometary discharge can reach 2 million degrees.

Cometary nuclei reveal deeply cratered and blackened surfaces due to electric arcing. Since comet nuclei are eroded electrically, they could not survive across eons of solar system history and may have been produced much more recently than proposed in the Standard Model.

For more information on the Electric Comet model click here.

Planetary Science

In the recent history of the solar system, its electrical environment changed. Under changing electrical conditions planetary orbits changed as well. Close approaches of planets led to powerful electric arcing between planets and moons. All rocky bodies in the solar system show the massive scars of these kinds of electrical events.

Electric discharge scarring is occurring even now on Jupiter’s closest moon, Io, and on Saturn’s moon, Enceladus. Electrical activity continues on Mars, driving “dust devils” the size of Mount Everest – created by the electrical differential between the surface of Mars and surrounding space.

All of the dominant surface features of Mars show the patterns of electric discharge, suggesting that in the past a vast quantity of material was excavated electrically from Mars. Electric Universe proponents suggest that it was an interplanetary arc that created the Martian Valles Marineris, the largest known scar on a solid planet. Much of the rocky material exploding from Mars became comets, asteroids, and meteorites.

Additional information about the electrical scarring of Mars is available here.

 

 

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

@screamingeagle I can lean towards the universe being made up by electricity (elec-tri- city = elect three cities) the three heavenly realms.  Maybe God is this bright spark where it all began after all we encounter lightening, electromagnetic' s, the sun, the moon, fire etc. And then we have Tesla who I strongly believe, plus it does mention the pleiades  & Orion in scripture. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, screamingeagle said:

"free" energy....

 

Where is it then?  Many people are aware of stuff like Tesla's notes on the subject but ... no results.  Although right now many scientists are working on this kind of thing, still no results ... or rather vacuum energy is free but very minute and not useful.

The Sun is the way the universe creates power and nuclear energy is closer to that than "free energy".  If somebody finds "free energy" it would be a shock they have had a long time and it's not been found.

I don't think things are free, and I think "free things" are a very negative idea ... what will you do then, it would render human life worthless.

Some say that Gravity is an electro-magnetic phenomenon.  Well it's as good as any other theory.  I don't know.

I don't really understand the term the Electric Universe, it's a good name for a nightclub ... but there doesn't seem to be a particular theory/hypothesis/experimental results.  Perhaps people just feel that there is something more.

Edited by rideforever
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
On 8/30/2020 at 6:10 PM, rideforever said:

What does the Electric Universe mean to us ?

Potentially, pretty much everything we learnt in geography, earth history and cosmology is incorrect. It covers so many topics that it disproves many at the same time. One easy way to describe it is in crater formation. Craters are generally thought to be impact created by meteorites yet 90% of them appear to have been hit directly from above vectoring directly to the centre of the planet or moon. Clearly, this impossible as most impacts would be at an angle to the vertical. So what causes craters? They can and have been accurately reproduced in labs using electrical discharge arcing so the notion is that they are created by gigantic interplanetary lightning bolts occuring during a time of inter planetary upheaval - Clash of the Titans. Craters can be hexagonal, have bullseye craters smack in the middle, smaller craters placed around the perimeter of larger craters, craters in a straight line etc.

 

Going back to the Clash of the Titans, Medusa is seen as the Planet Venus in her "Terrible Aspect" moving across the sky as a large comet and, at one point, interacting with the Earth to cause massive planetary scarring via interplanetary lightning bolts. The valleys and the mountains being thus created instantaneously. The scene in Clash of the Titans whereby if you look in her face, you're turned to stone. Even in native American Lore, it's stated that after coming back above ground, animals had been turned to stone.

 

Emmanuel Velikovsky ignited much interest in the topic with his Best Seller "Worlds in Collision". He has some excellent vids on Youtube.

 

One of the best watches, is "Symbols of an Alien Sky"

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Anthony Perrat is a plasma physicist who attended an electric universe conference. He was very surprised to see that the pertorglyphs shared at the conference were identical to high energy plasma discharges viewed inside the classified laboratory environment where he worked. Why did rock art resemble high energy plasma discharghe only presently viewed in a classified environment? The idea is put forward that it was viewed in the ancient sky as the rock art is slightly different, to a very specific degree, depending on where one is stood and viewing it from the Earth's service.

 

Squatter man petroglyph as plasma discharge:

 

squatting-squatter-man-petroglyphs-rocka

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

The Electric Universe Theory was first proposed by Hannes Alfvén in the 1930s. Alfvén argued that if a plasma penetrates the universe, it can carry electric currents that can generate a galactic magnetic field. He later received the Nobel Prize for his work in magnetohydrodynamics.

There is absolutely no evidence for the theory of the Electric Universe, and it does not even fit the definition of the theory, since it cannot be used to predict natural phenomena or phenomena that have not yet been observed. This has recently been popularized by many non-professionals in search of an easier way to explain the universe.

 

Yes, people always want simpler and easier explanations.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/31/2020 at 3:11 AM, TommyJ said:

There is absolutely no evidence for the theory of the Electric Universe

 

Quote

Electric Currents in Geospace and Beyond

First published:31 March 2018
Print ISBN:9781119324492 |Online ISBN:9781119324522 |DOI:10.1002/9781119324522
© 2018 American Geophysical Union

 

Electric currents are fundamental to the structure and dynamics of space plasmas, including our own near-Earth space environment, or “geospace.”This volume takes an integrated approach to the subject of electric currents by incorporating their phenomenology and physics for many regions in one volume. It covers a broad range of topics from the pioneers of electric currents in outer space, to measurement and analysis techniques, and the many types of electric currents. 

  • First volume on electric currents in space in over a decade that provides authoritative up-to-date insight on the current status of research
  • Reviews recent advances in observations, simulation, and theory of electric currents
  • Provides comparative overviews of electric currents in the space environments of different astronomical bodies

Electric Currents in Geospace and Beyond serves as an excellent reference volume for a broad community of space scientists, astronomers, and astrophysicists who are studying space plasmas in the solar system.

Quote

The American Geophysical Union (AGU) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization of Earth, atmospheric, ocean, hydrologic, space, and planetary scientists, consisting of over 62,000 members from 144 countries. AGU's activities are focused on the organization and dissemination of scientific information in the interdisciplinary and international fields within the Earth and space sciences.

the ignorance on display around here is sickening

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/31/2020 at 11:11 AM, TommyJ said:

since it cannot be used to predict natural phenomena

 

It predicted the physical make up and behaviour of the comet / meteor - 67P and more, I believe.. 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Basket Case said:

 

It predicted the physical make up and behaviour of the comet / meteor - 67P and more, I believe.. 

 

true, Wal Thornhill alone did a better job than the all the people involved in the project, every one of his predictions was verified and none of the expectations of team scientists were met

 

i suspect most people dont understand science at all, they get their sciencey information from news broadcasts and cereal boxes, they dont know jack shit about electricity or the universe, or anything else for that matter

 

these are dark days ahead, theres a storm full of stupid on its way and it just started raining

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...