PCR Test tests for Chromosome 8!

[Dagmar Gross]

Hi folks, this is mega-important! I have just discovered on Max Igan's latest report that on the WHO website there is a document titled "Corona Virus PCR Testing Protocol" and a lady called Amanda Vollmer has found there that they are testing people for our Chromosome 8! This is for our level of intelligence and for cancers!

So, they will want to mess with our intelligence, make us all stupid! And kill us with cancers, well, and with other things too, of course.

 

Here is the Vollmer video:

 

And I add Max Igan's one on this too, from Bitchute, where part of the above one is too.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/YZMJTVSeRSA/?fbclid=IwAR1NssOyVsmaxHImmYRlXet1uZ6uTajwODdvP3ai-A8lu2Ol0JHgUp0Wryo

[Dagmar Gross]

This morning, the first person I met on the street who I knew, I told her about this PCR Test testing for Chromosome 8 and she only replied that "You mustn't believe everything you read online".

This will be the result, I expect, every one of us will get with any government narrative believers. It is so disheartening! None of them believe any true information we tell them. I replied to her as she hurried on her way, no doubt as all the other blind people I know do, to get away from me as fast as possible, "Not even when it's written on the WHO website?" Never got an answer. She was far too busy for that, no doubt thinking me an idiot for believing all this.

Well, time will tell, but all these people will happily drag us all along into their own miserable future, as miserable it will soon be, once the 'vaccine' takes effect in them, even though they are all still riding high now...

[Morpheus]

18 minutes ago, Dagmar Gross said:

This morning, the first person I met on the street who I knew, I told her about this PCR Test testing for Chromosome 8 and she only replied that "You mustn't believe everything you read online".

This will be the result, I expect, every one of us will get with any government narrative believers. It is so disheartening! None of them believe any true information we tell them. I replied to her as she hurried on her way, no doubt as all the other blind people I know do, to get away from me as fast as possible, "Not even when it's written on the WHO website?" Never got an answer. She was far too busy for that, no doubt thinking me an idiot for believing all this.

Well, time will tell, but all these people will happily drag us all along into their own miserable future, as miserable it will soon be, once the 'vaccine' takes effect in them, even though they are all still riding high now...

Don't believe everything you read online, but ........ Believe everything that the BBC tells you. That's about right. Go back to sleep now, nothing to see here. 

 

I wonder though, if I should be concerned, that both my partner and daughter who have both had tests were negative. Do you think they're missing their chromosome 8?

[KFC Mondays]

16 hours ago, Morpheus said:

Don't believe everything you read online, but ........ Believe everything that the BBC tells you. That's about right. Go back to sleep now, nothing to see here. 

 

I wonder though, if I should be concerned, that both my partner and daughter who have both had tests were negative. Do you think they're missing their chromosome 8?

Obviously not human . . .

[Morpheus]

2 hours ago, KFC Mondays said:

Obviously not human . . .

I've had my suspicions . . .  

[AlsoNotAnoymous]

The bigger story... I've liked Icke for yrs, it's time for Icke to call Kaufman... Its embarrasing for Icke and Kaufman and Vollmer.. they based this on a blogger Fauxlex on Piece of Mind... Fauxlex admits he got it wrong... Kaufman missed it, but Kaufman has a molecular genetic degree... so he should have spotted the errors!  Explained in 5mins here... I invite Kaufman to respond... https://youtu.be/O2TTKM1NWDA

Edited August 30, 2020 by AlsoNotAnoymous

[zarkov]

This argument is becoming blurred as  goalposts are moved to add validity to a distinctly flawed process for the detection of so called pathogenic viruses  - That of PCR and rtPCR

 

The following is a quotation from a commenter  I have come across from time to time - always lucidly presenting sound argument against this ridiculous indirect process used to determine cause of infection.

 

Quote

 

Tony :-

 

As I understand it, the alleged coronavirus in question is an RNA virus. If that is the case, then it follows that the alleged ‘viral DNA’ referred to is complementary DNA or cDNA.
The complementary DNA (cDNA) is synthesized in the laboratory from messenger RNA, but cDNA is not necessarily viral genomic DNA, because the transcript of genomic RNA has been processed (i.e., it lacks promoters and introns) and the true source of the any RNA (whether it is alleged to be viral or otherwise) remains unknown and still needs to be determined even if it is found in samples derived from a Covid-19 patient.

 

cDNA synthesis includes a two-step (first- and second-strand synthesis) conversion of the cleaned up RNA found in the samples to more stable copy DNA (cDNA). The specialized enzyme reverse transcriptase is utilized, to synthesize and convert single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) into double-stranded DNA that is a complimentary copy of the mRNA. In other words, the sequence of the cDNA becomes complementary to the RNA sequence.

A preparation of cDNA thus represents the genes that were actively being expressed in a cell, organ or even a whole organism at the time of harvesting and is called a cDNA library. cDNA can also be used in gene cloning and for gene probes (templates). RT-PCR was developed to identify RNA targets. In this process, complementary DNA (cDNA) is first produced from RNA targets by reverse transcription which requires primers e.g. oligo dT primers or random hexamers to prime the synthesis of the initial DNA strand. The primers can generate cDNA from all RNA in the sample, and the last step is the amplification of cDNA by PCR.

 

The problem is, if the coronavirus in question was never isolated in the first place and pure virus particles were never obtained (which has never been done to date), then its genome cannot be used as a standard to compare any genetic material that may have been found in the samples from patients allegedly suffering from Covid-19. Which implies that the genetic material in the samples could have come from something else (e.g. a harmless retrovirus, or exosomes or apoptotic bodies) that have nothing to do with any alleged coronavirus.

 

Wikipedia states the following:

Some viruses also use cDNA to turn their viral RNA into mRNA (viral RNA → cDNA → mRNA). The mRNA is used to make viral proteins to take over the host cell.

 

This assertion is problematic in the sense that lifeless viruses cannot “use” anything to make anything because according to virology the host cell must do everything for the virus which can’t function outside of a host cell. But it’s not just any old host cell either.

Virology informs us that any alleged ‘pathogenic’ virus which is no more than a specific chemical assembly of metastable particles, must use a living cell that is “accessible, susceptible and permissive” – but the question remains. How is a distinct host cell independent of the virus constrained to function so as to fulfil the functional imperatives coded in the viral genome in order to complete the process virus replication cycle?

 

The simple answer is it cannot if the host cell also has its own conditions of existence that it must secure in order to survive and is determined by those conditions, unless of course a surreptitious pre-established correspondence is postulated between the attributes of all pathogenic viruses and all the “accessible, susceptible and permissive” host cells they are alleged to ‘infect’.

 

However, such a correspondence can never be proven. So the whole thing collapses into the closed and empty circle of functional determination where host cells ‘exist’ as the functional means to the fulfilment of a given functional end – the replication of the virus.

But in reality, the host cells have no affect on the virus other than acting as a functional support of the viral replication process.

Alleged pathogenic viruses ‘exist’ as distinct complex determinate unities of being that are somehow thought to possess all the necessary inherent attributes and information coded in their genomes that allow them survive and replicate. Their precise conditions of existence are never adequately specified in virology so their existence is therefore unconditional and inexplicable. All we seem to get are some vague speculative assertions relating to evolutionary theory:

 

No one knows exactly when viruses emerged or from where they came, since viruses do not leave historical footprints such as fossils. Modern viruses are thought to be a mosaic of bits and pieces of nucleic acids picked up from various sources along their respective evolutionary paths.

https://courses.lumenlearning.com/wm-biology2/chapter/history-of-viruses/

 

The host cells then, that these alleged viruses are supposed to ‘infect’, are subject to two incompatible and contradictory forms of constraint (a) they are constrained to secure some of their own means and conditions of existence in order to survive on the one hand, and (b) they are also somehow constrained to function in accordance with the conditions imposed upon them by means of the information coded in the genomes of the alleged pathogenic viruses on the other. But that renders that aspect of the current theory of viruses untenable.

 

So in a nutshell, and leaving the problems of essentialism, teleology and causal reductionism aside as it pertains to lifeless ‘pathogenic’ viruses as conceived by virology -they cannot “take over” anything, or “use” anything to replicate.

 

 

 

 

 

To imagine that an inert/dead so called pathogenic particle with no discernable intelligence could supposedly takes over an intelligent cell and passively (as a dead particle) use its hosts mechanism to replicate according to its own lifeless determinations is possibly the most ridiculous propsition that I have ever encountered. 

 

This could only occur politically and the royal society was nothing if not political.

 

Bear in mind that the whole process of virology and its premis is based completely via  INDIRECT PROCESSES

I.E. no direct observation of viral pathogenicity!

 

another video refuting the PCR test among others

 

Edited August 31, 2020 by zarkov

[ZX83B]

Hi guys, i hope david gets to see this.....i think i know what the PCR test is really measuring.......perhaps intelligence yes.... but did you know that chromosome 8 houses the VMAT1 gene?......which controls the expression of the VMAT2 gene over in chromosome 10?

 

The pentagon called the VMAT2 gene "the god gene" it is the expression and connection of your body to the spiritual, or god, or the all that is, or the higher dimensions.....whatever you want to call it.

 

This VMAT2 (and VMAT1) gene is harvested from the body using a PCR test, there are dozens of studies that you can read that confirm this......once harvested they can measure the strength of expression of this gene in an individual..........and HOW SPIRITUAL they are.

 

We know they are building a genetic data base..........have they finally found out how to identify all those spiritual folk hidden in all walks of life who quietly hold the light of god?

 

You should know that they can switch off the VMAT2 gene with something called reserpine which is a VMAT2 inhibitor.

 

If this was in a vaccine then its purpose would be to sever everyone's spiritual connection and remove or weaken gods influence on earth?. Big payday for the satanists right?

 

Here is a video that put me on to this......its not long........note how in almost the first sentence he says they used a PCR test to harvest the human DNA they needed.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=piELyx5gaUI

[Dr WHO?]

5 hours ago, ZX83B said:

Hi guys, i hope david gets to see this.....i think i know what the PCR test is really measuring.......perhaps intelligence yes.... but did you know that chromosome 8 houses the VMAT1 gene?......which controls the expression of the VMAT2 gene over in chromosome 10?

 

The pentagon called the VMAT2 gene "the god gene" it is the expression and connection of your body to the spiritual, or god, or the all that is, or the higher dimensions.....whatever you want to call it.

 

This VMAT2 (and VMAT1) gene is harvested from the body using a PCR test, there are dozens of studies that you can read that confirm this......once harvested they can measure the strength of expression of this gene in an individual..........and HOW SPIRITUAL they are.

 

We know they are building a genetic data base..........have they finally found out how to identify all those spiritual folk hidden in all walks of life who quietly hold the light of god?

 

You should know that they can switch off the VMAT2 gene with something called reserpine which is a VMAT2 inhibitor.

 

If this was in a vaccine then its purpose would be to sever everyone's spiritual connection and remove or weaken gods influence on earth?. Big payday for the satanists right?

 

 

No, dont think so! So assuming they could switch off the gene thats supposedly makes people unspiritual, (whatever that is) will make them evil commies? So far all the accumulated religious expressions over 10 thousand years have caused more harm then good, so i suggest you do some more homework on the subject and also on commies and religions/spiritualisms as such etc.

 

I have suggestion, try to find a vaxx that can be injected into psychopaths that makes the broken cable between frontal cortex and amygdala

whole again and you will see most bullcrap on the planet disappear like a snow flake in a Finlandian sauna!

Edited August 31, 2020 by Dr WHO?