Bombshell Evidence that COVID RNA Base Pairs are Identical to Chromosome 8 Human DNA

[rwkt]

Bombshell Evidence that COVID RNA Base Pairs are Identical to Chromosome 8 Human DNA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited August 22, 2020 by rwkt

[rwkt]

Urgent Information About Your Future

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[rwkt]

FROM UK COLUMN FORUM

 

 

A response to this post from another forum. about the interview of David Icke with Dr Kaufman

 

 

 

Replying my reply to a post in another thread – do not waste your time with this…

 

Look everyone – this story seems to be spreading like wildfire on the fake news internet and it is total rubbish. I have designed and run a few 1000 or more PCR reactions of this type in my life, so I know.

The PCR test for these types of virus is an RT-PCR that first relies on the extraction of viral genomic RNA from the sample. Even if it is contaminated with human DNA (e.g. human cells from the swab) it should not give a positive result because of the method of DNA-free RNA extraction. Then the fact that some area of the primer sequences are complimentary to sequences in the human genome is no great surprise – but it is not the entire 18 nucleotides of each primer that is the same, it is around 14-16 at most- so even if you run a PCR on human DNA with these primers at the specified annealing temperature, you will probably not get a product because (a) the whole primer will not anneal to the human sequence and (b) the identical areas that the primers are similar to, are too far apart to generate a product. In this type of PCR there is also a 3rd element that is being overlooked and that is the probe that binds to the parts between the 2 primers in SARS-nCov2 and give the signal in the PCR reaction – this needs to be between the two primers – so there is no chance in a month of Sundays that this test is picking up a signal in all humans – if it was that badly designed and non-specific there are millions of competent and honest scientists on the planet that would have flagged this.

This is real fake news and it is counterproductive!!!

 

A question was asked as to this persons credentials and what would be the truth surrounding this disclosure would be.

 

Awaiting answer.

 

 

 

Edited August 25, 2020 by rwkt

[Mitochondrial Eve]

5 minutes ago, rwkt said:

FROM UK COLUMN FORUM

 

A response to this post from another forum.

 

Replying my reply to a post in another thread – do not waste your time with this…

 

Look everyone – this story seems to be spreading like wildfire on the fake news internet and it is total rubbish. I have designed and run a few 1000 or more PCR reactions of this type in my life, so I know.

The PCR test for these types of virus is an RT-PCR that first relies on the extraction of viral genomic RNA from the sample. Even if it is contaminated with human DNA (e.g. human cells from the swab) it should not give a positive result because of the method of DNA-free RNA extraction. Then the fact that some area of the primer sequences are complimentary to sequences in the human genome is no great surprise – but it is not the entire 18 nucleotides of each primer that is the same, it is around 14-16 at most- so even if you run a PCR on human DNA with these primers at the specified annealing temperature, you will probably not get a product because (a) the whole primer will not anneal to the human sequence and (b) the identical areas that the primers are similar to, are too far apart to generate a product. In this type of PCR there is also a 3rd element that is being overlooked and that is the probe that binds to the parts between the 2 primers in SARS-nCov2 and give the signal in the PCR reaction – this needs to be between the two primers – so there is no chance in a month of Sundays that this test is picking up a signal in all humans – if it was that badly designed and non-specific there are millions of competent and honest scientists on the planet that would have flagged this.

This is real fake news and it is counterproductive!!!

 

A question was asked as to this persons credentials and what would be the truth surrounding this disclosure would be.

 

Awaiting answer.

 

I am sceptical too about the chromosome 8 issue and posted this on the coronavirus mega-thread - link below.

 

My main concern is that, when the original findings were first posted by Fauxlex (? Steve Kelly) in April, a comment was later left by Bernd Paysan which seemed to receive acknowledgement from Fauxlex that perhaps his findings were not entirely right. After that, discussion ended and nobody addressed the questions raised by Bernd Paysan.

 

Therefore, in order for me to be convinced that these findings really are the "bombshell" people are claiming them to be (so long after the original post), I think somebody with expertise in this area needs to address the points raised by Bernd Paysan and show how he has got things wrong and why Fauxlex was in fact correct.

 

https://pieceofmindful.com/2020/04/06/bombshell-who-coronavirus-pcr-test-primer-sequence-is-found-in-all-human-dna/

 

 

[Mitochondrial Eve]

I have found a Youtube upload of David Icke's interview yesterday with Dr Andrew Kaufman about chromosome 8 and the PCR test.

 

I wouldn't say that Dr Kaufman has given the findings a glowing endorsement, but rather more cautious support of how the chromosome 8 issue has added to the "confusion and obfuscation" surrounding the tests with the most salient point still remaining that the "virus" has never been a purified and isolated.

 

 

[Yasmina]

Thanks @Mitochondrial Eve

[Mitochondrial Eve]

I have seen this shared on Facebook today - a response to the chromosome 8 issue from Dr Jurgen Mayer.

 

 

 

https://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-forward-and-vs-reverse-primer/

 

It is looking to me like the chromosome 8 issue is a red herring. The focus on debunking the RT-PCR test I think needs to be on the failure to isolate and purify the virus.

[Guest Gone Fishing...]

On 8/23/2020 at 8:51 AM, rwkt said:

Urgent Information About Your Future

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Now on bitchute;

https://www.bitchute.com/video/YZMJTVSeRSA/ 
 

 

[Kovidiot]

since the virus is immaginary then it stands to reason that all the base pair are immaginary too

[AlsoNotAnoymous]

The bigger story... I've liked Icke for yrs, it's time for Icke to call Kaufman... Its embarrasing for Icke and Kaufman and Vollmer.. they based this on a blogger Fauxlex on Piece of Mind... Fauxlex admits he got it wrong... Kaufman missed it, but Kaufman has a molecular genetic degree.! .. so he should have spotted the errors!  This is concrete evidence Kaufman doesn't know what he is talking about on this topic... Explained in 5mins here... https://youtu.be/O2TTKM1NWDA

[Concerned Citizen]

This situation of the pcr test primer that was brought into question HAS to be LOOKED at again. DAVID and Dr. Kaufman + others perhaps need to FULLY SORT out the FACTS on this. If the "reverse" idea is what is at fault then that is a fundamental mistake made by Dr. Kaufman. 

I, for one, will be questioning the other fact of "virus existence" again if the pcr test claim of being false from the primer information is shown to be incorrect.

 

FOR ME the whole pandemic / plandemic rests on these facts. Once these are sorted then in my mind other aspects become either far less significant or more significant depending on the outcome of 

a) the virus existing 

b) the test being NOT valid

YES, the Lockdowns have created problems, and NO I will still NOT wear a face nappy (nor will I have a mobile phone, but that goes back to when they were originally produced, so not referring here to 5G).

 

Oh, and I will NOT have that vaccine.

Edited August 30, 2020 by Concerned Citizen
extra added

[jesuitsdidit]

Beginning to suspect Vollmer is fake. 

Maybe someone wants to discredit Kaufman?

[jesuitsdidit]

9 minutes ago, jesuitsdidit said:

Beginning to suspect Vollmer is fake. 

Maybe someone wants to discredit Kaufman?

 

After all, he is questioning the very existence of viruses

and that is HUGE!!

 

Edited September 10, 2020 by jesuitsdidit

[jesuitsdidit]

Just now, jesuitsdidit said:

After all, he is questioning the very existence of viruses

and that is HUGE!!

 

Because if CV 19 is not a virus that tells us 2 things:

1 it's either a bacteria, fungus, parasite or 5g

2 it's not naturally occurring - it's come from the PTB.

 

[jesuitsdidit]

On 9/10/2020 at 8:13 PM, jesuitsdidit said:

 

After all, he is questioning the very existence of viruses

and that is HUGE!!

 

 

In case you are unaware, he believes that the round things with spikes that we are told are viruses are in fact EXOSOMES which are message carriers released by cells to communicate with other cells. There are others who also believe this to be true.

[jesuitsdidit]

6 minutes ago, jesuitsdidit said:

 

In case you are unaware, he believes that the round things with spikes that we are told are viruses are in fact EXOSOMES which are message carriers released by cells to communicate with other cells. There are others who also believe this to be true.

 

The body's tiny cargo carriers
knowablemagazine.org
https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.knowablemagazine.org%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Farticles%2F283%2FG-exosomes-on-the-move.svg&imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.knowablemagazine.org%2Farticle%2Fliving-world%2F2019%2Fbodys-tiny-cargo-carriers&tbnid=dLKexB8FLfTZhM&vet=1&docid=ecej6WqeeWTI1M&w=720&h=800&source=sh%2Fx%2Fim

[jesuitsdidit]

Frontiers | “Exosomics”—A Review of ...
frontiersin.org
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2018.00092/full

[jesuitsdidit]

 

What some people have noted is that many/most serious disease outbreaks since about 1850 have coincided with major advances in electrical technology. 

I think the Spanish Flu outbreak 1918 which killed 2% of global population, coincided with the roll-out of a new form of radar/radio.

I listened to a lecture and all the major outbreaks coincided with a new step in electronics/radio/radar.

 

[jesuitsdidit]

Just now, jesuitsdidit said:

 

What some people have noted is that many/most serious disease outbreaks since about 1850 have coincided with major advances in electrical technology. 

I think the Spanish Flu outbreak 1918 which killed 2% of global population, coincided with the roll-out of a new form of radar/radio.

I listened to a lecture and all the major outbreaks coincided with a new step in electronics/radio/radar.

 

 

To those who question the existence of viruses, (some people say no one has ever photographed a virus) the above if true, indicates that some modern diseases are in fact caused by a new level of electro-magnetic radiation that the human body has never before experienced.

It is now accepted that radiation at 60ghz interferes with the ability of human blood to absorb oxygen. This is a concrete example of radiation even at low levels causing illness.

60ghz btw is one of the frequencies used by 5g.

 

[jesuitsdidit]

You may be interested in this thread

French Medical Expert Warning. Planned Mass Vaccination contains 2 classified ingredients and Squalene. 700k children to be tested/week.

https://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message4388090/pg1

 

[jesuitsdidit]

20 minutes ago, jesuitsdidit said:

 

To those who question the existence of viruses, (some people say no one has ever photographed a virus) the above if true, indicates that some modern diseases are in fact caused by a new level of electro-magnetic radiation that the human body has never before experienced.

It is now accepted that radiation at 60ghz interferes with the ability of human blood to absorb oxygen. This is a concrete example of radiation even at low levels causing illness.

60ghz btw is one of the frequencies used by 5g.

 

 

Apparently the connection between advances in radio technology and disease outbreaks was noticed by Rudolf Steiner.