Jump to content

New Netflix Movie Celebrates 11-Year-Old Girls Twerking


Recommended Posts




As of right now, a full 88 percent of critics approve of Cuties, Netflix's piece of soft-core child pornography, while only three percent of the audience agree.

That's not a typo.

Three percent.

Over the years, I've seen some wide gulfs between audience and critic at Rotten Tomatoes, but that probably takes the cake and the pie and the whole enchilada.

Keep in mind, Rotten Tomatoes has worked hard to game these scores to protect its Hollywood masters, and still it's 88 to three.

So, despite what the fake media are telling you about criticism of Cuties coming only from the close-minded and unenlightened political right, Cuties is not proving to be at all divisive, at least not among real people. A full 1,047 audience members voted on Cuties, which means 1,047 of everyday people took the time to log an opinion, and only three percent gave it a thumbs up. That works out to a terrible approval score of less than one percent — 0.69 percent, to be precise.

So where are all the enlightened and sophisticated Biden voters voting Cuties up?


  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

I find the whole "pedophelia" thing a twisted perverted witch-hunting abuse cult that has its origins in the bold new media of the early eu using the diabolical accusation against the media personalities, politicians and church figures whose reputations they deliberated to destroy with the nw buzzword "pedophile".


Prior to this the word was an obscure socialogic term contra-indicative of child abusive. A pedophile in the pre-90s unbastardised meaning of the obscure word would be ideal priests, teachers, social workers, childrens entertainers etc because they would be the least likely to engage in child abuse since they could form phelial relationships with children that government robots could not. Phelial love in the places such terms are not obscure is held to be distinct from erotic love and agape love. The brave new media character assasinated any who may be opposed to their new international regime with a misnomer suggesting erotic attraction to children.


A culture of bullies calling the virtuous a bunch of gay boys.


27 years, 4 wars, a expansive surveillance state, abolished sovereignties and seriously degraded human rights later and emotional, psychological and physical child abuse goes on unabated as everyone focusses on concerns that Prince Andrew might have shagged a 17 year old while Luke Rudowsky is emailed kiddie porn. We hear so much about Rolf Harrises caught with compromising pictures of children on their computer but we hear very little about who takes those pictures and who publishes them and whether is lawful excuse in pictures being taken (Julia Somerville) and pictures being held (evidence of physical abuse versus blackmail gangs). That these practices can be ascertained to be going on while the police chase whatever wild goose the brave new media feed them, the state is visibly powerless in the face of sophisticated criminal gangs where public order is a smokescreen for the surveillance state ruling over an anti-democratic farce where the public are deprived of human rights while the priveleged pretend its a mental illness for anyone to notice.


How convenient it is that I kill no cow when I buy minced beef from ASDA but when the desperate are seeking organs and the overpopulated are seeking abortions in a world which intends an electronic policeman for everybodies phone, where are the pedophiles? Who is who in a twisted world of lies turning children into obedient blinded slaves while pushing sensational slander against anyone who stands in their way. Where are these innocent weapons of war in the hands of blackmailers who have no concept of right and wrong?


Were you a child used for sex pictures in the past 27 years? Where are you? Wheres the evidence?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...
Guest Gone Fishing...
2 hours ago, JeanPowell said:

I saw this movie it was very good and touching

Hello Jean.
Can you expand / explain further please ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Netflix Animation Pushes Pedophilia And Child Pornography

AvatarAlexander LightOctober 24, 2018

According to Vanity Fair, the child ‘frequently masturbates with her favorite childhood toy, a stuffed worm.’

by Caldron Pool

In 2008 an Australian man was convicted of possessing child pornography, fined $3,000 and required to enter a two-year good behavior bond in relation to each offence.

The pornographic content in the man’s possession comprised of a series of cartoons depicting underage characters from The Simpsons engaging in sex acts.


Fast forward a decade, and almost identical content can now be legally streamed into your living room, thanks to Netflix’s animated series Big Mouth.

The show has been described as a “raucous, delightfully vulgar exploration of puberty.” The series follows a group of children, “navigating their way through puberty, masturbation, and sexual arousal.”

One of the characters is a 13-year-old girl named Missy, “a modern-day answer to Lisa Simpson.”

According to Vanity Fair, Missy is innocent, but certainly not perfect:

“She’s an innocent little nerd whose breathless, high-pitched voice belies the hormonal pre-teen within. Her budding sexuality outpaces her physical development; she’s frequently masturbating this season, even though she still has the body of a child… Missy masturbates with her favorite childhood toy, a stuffed worm, in an act her family calls ‘worm dancing.’”

In one episode, two of the young characters are taken into a nude women’s spa, where they are seduced by a female demon until they eventually take off their clothes and begin dancing with other naked adults.

The show’s official Facebook verified page, and Twitter verified account, have shared the uncensored video, which somehow falls within Community Standards.

Due to the graphic nature of the content, we’ve decided not to share it here. We have, however, included some censored screen shots below:





A clear Satanic reference: A Baphomet-like figure dancing with naked children on a Masonic tessellated pavement










And here’s Baphomet, the god of Satanists, once again
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Create New...