Jump to content

Disease X


Recommended Posts

At Davos, WEF to warn of a 'Disease X' with '20x more fatalities' than Covid-19

Event 201 all over again?

11 Jan 2024

The description for the discussion reads: “With fresh warnings from the World Health Organization that an unknown ‘Disease X’ could result in 20 times more fatalities than the coronavirus pandemic, what novel efforts are needed to prepare healthcare systems for the multiple challenges ahead?”


The panel will feature a high-profile lineup that includes WHO director “Dr” Tedros and the chairman of AstraZeneca.

The concept of a Disease X was adopted by the World Health Organization in 2018. Tedros, Dr Anthony Fauci, Jeremy Farrar of the eugenicist Wellcome Trust, and many high profile individuals on the forefront of Covid hysteria policy have been involved in advancing the Disease X hypothesis over the years.

Now, it’s easy for normal people to dismiss this lunacy. But given the powerful, maniacal minds populating the Davos gathering, it’s worth maintaining a level of situational awareness surrounding these events, as they can often offer some insight into the unguarded mindset of these technocratic tyrants.

On this topic, it’s worth recalling that another infamous predictive panel was announced at the 2019 WEF Davos conference. That panel concluded with the launch announcement of Event 201.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Bombadil changed the title to Disease X
  • 2 weeks later...

Is this the globalists threatening to trigger something in the jabbed if their governments don't comply with the demands?

WHO: Those Failing to Comply with NWO Will Be Killed by ‘Disease X’

Hunter Fielding
January 29, 20247 Comments

The head of the World Health Organization (WHO) has warned sovereign nations that those states that refuse to comply with the globalists’ “New Order” will pay the price when so-called “Disease X” is unleashed on the public.

According to WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, the “New World Order” will be ushered in when states sign the United Nations “health” agency’s “Pandemic Treaty.”

By signing the treaty, countries will enable the United Nations (UN) and WHO be establish an unelected single world government.

Under the condition of the treaty, nations will need to surrender their powers to the UN for the sake of the “New Order.”

The WHO is now demanding that all member states sign the treaty in order to be “protected” from “Disease X.”

Those who fail to comply will be signing a death warrant for their citizens, Tedros warns.

Steve Watson and Professor Michel Chossudovsky expounded on this conspiracy in a Jan. 25 piece published by the Center for Research on Globalization.

They quoted a piece by Forbes about Disease X, which is used by medical tyrants to “encourage the development of countermeasures, including vaccines and tests, to deploy in the case of a future outbreak.”

According to the article, the WHO convened a group of more than 300 scientists in November 2022 to study Disease X.

This disease, caused by an “unknown pathogen that could cause a serious international epidemic,” reportedly has a mortality rate “20 times that of [the Wuhan coronavirus] (COVID-19).”

During the globalist World Economic Forum’s (WEF) meeting at Davos, Switzerland, Tedros stressed that governments must prepare for the outbreak of Disease X.

Nevertheless, the WHO head admitted that the momentum for this preparation “had been slowed down by entrenched positions and a torrent of fake news, lies and conspiracy theories.”

However, according to Watson and Chossudovsky, this supposed preparation isn’t for the hypothetical Disease X – but for the globalists’ bigger designs through the Pandemic Treaty.

Under this treaty, the entire eight billion people in the world would see their data being digitized and tied to the digital ID and central bank digital currency.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

The FDA and Vaccine Manufacturers Still Refuse to Show Us Their Work

When it comes to mRNA injections for Covid, Americans are 100% dependent on the FDA and vaccine manufacturers to assess and confirm purity and consistency. That might be okay if the testing methodologies that manufacturers and the FDA were still fully transparent, but they’re not anymore.

Not only are the test results confidential, even the methodology used hasn’t been made public. The world just has to take manufacturers’ word that there’s no contamination or variability with the mRNA sequence or its lipid nanoparticle components – even though published epidemiology data indicate otherwise.

Secrecy abounds despite the vaccine manufacturers receiving billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars to conduct their R&D efforts. Transparency should be nonpartisan, especially when it comes to the quality of America’s pharmaceuticals.

On top of that, both the Trump and Biden administrations have proposed lifting Covid mRNA intellectual property rights for mRNA injections. Yet both the FDA and manufacturers are tightly protecting the ingredient information as proprietary or a trade secret. But is it really appropriate to label it “proprietary/trade secret” if the research, development and product were funded with hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars?

A transparent, publicly accountable FDA should be eager to prospectively test most or all of its regulated products for qualitative and quantitative consistency – and make those findings publicly available.

A transparent FDA would also share its testing methodology for mRNA Covid products for scientists who wish to confirm. But anyone trying to access this information will find it embargoed via an FDA report rendered useless by ludicrous redactions of not just the methodology, but the FDA’s critique of the methodology.

Without a list of ingredients or testing methodology, it is impossible for anyone else outside the FDA or manufacturers to know precisely how to check for product consistency. It is especially troublesome since new, preliminary data using independent methodology have produced troubling evidence of contamination in mRNA Covid product.

Also troubling is the fact that in 2021, the FDA opted to start monitoring America’s pharmaceutical quality via a remote collection of ‘mailed-in’ drug samples – a far less reliable process than testing samples directly collected at manufacturing plants or distribution points by FDA officials.

This ‘mail-in’ sampling methodology is absurd. It would be akin to a state health department monitoring restaurants by requesting them to periodically mail in various items from their menu to be tested for potential food-born contamination or asking restaurants to promise to test the items themselves.

Lack of Specific Dosing Transparency Has No Precedence

Unlike every other FDA-approved pharmaceutical, including a previously approved RNA-based products including patisiran (Onpattro®), none of the Covid injections provide the sequence, molecular weight and milligram strength on their official FDA package labelNormally, official FDA package labelling provides specifics of the actual ingredients in that volume, including the structure, sequence and specific concentration. That is not the case for Covid mRNA labels.

Look up whatever pharmaceuticals you can think of in the Drugs.com database, and you’ll see how all labels provide structure and molecular weight in their official package labelling. Covid mRNA shots are a conspicuous exception to the historical FDA approval practice and ‘truthful label’ rule.

The study raises a number of critically important questions, which can’t begin to be answered without the consistency being verified beforehand – and ‘mail-in’ sampling is not the way to do it.

Providing ingredient transparency and assuring quality via an appropriate sampling methodology is a core mission of the FDA. In fact, it was the primary reason for establishing the agency back in 1906. Americans today deserve complete transparency and improved quality control oversight when it comes to our pharmaceuticals. Our health may depend on it.

Dr. David Gortler is a pharmacologist, pharmacist, research scientist and a former member of the FDA Senior Executive Leadership Team who served as senior advisor to the FDA Commissioner on matters of FDA regulatory affairs, drug safety and FDA science policy. He is a former Yale University and Georgetown University Didactic Professor of Pharmacology and Biotechnology. This article was previously published by the Brownstone Institute.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 8/18/2020 at 12:15 AM, Guest said:
Covid 19: A Review Part 7

Is Britain now effectively under military control?

10,000 extra troops to join British army's Covid support force
MoD doubles size of force amid fears over ability of police and NHS to cope with crisis
Haroon Siddique and Robert Booth

Wed 18 Mar 2020 22.30 GMT
Specialist military planners are also being deployed to steer local responses to the pandemic and tackle rising pressure on care homes, after a request by the communities secretary, Robert Jenrick.
There are fears about the ability of the police and NHS, which are both already at full stretch, to deal with the scale of the crisis. While the government has been reluctant to highlight such a bleak prospect, the armed forces need to be prepared for the threat of a breakdown in civil order given that troops have been deployed in other countries to enforce lockdowns and prevent looting of shops.
Up to 70 non-uniformed military personnel with crisis planning expertise are being sent to all 38 local resilience forums, to "test planning and identify weaknesses", defence sources said.

Local resilience forums are normally made up of councils, NHS bodies, emergency services and the environment agency. The military planners joining them are described as experts in coordinating resources in a crisis, which in the care system will mean bolstering already stretched operations.
Jenrick asked for an increase in military help, specifically highlighting the need to "support local authority elements of Covid-19 response plans, including social care".
The Standing Joint Command HQ in Aldershot, Hampshire, will serve as the command and control structure for the Covid support force.
The military was recently involved in civil contingency work when called on to support the government"s response to flooding.

Meanwhile in the US more evidence emerges of the movement of dangerous pathogens back and forth between the americas and china in the luggage of scientists. How come I couldn't get my shaving foam through customs and yet scientists are taking deadly pathogens back and forth?
FBI warned of concerns over 'biosecurity risk' from Chinese scientists' research in the US after intercepting Sars virus and flu samples illicitly carried in their luggage a year before coronavirus outbreak
  • Customs at Detroit Airport stopped Chinese biologist with samples on way to lab
  • It forms part of a larger FBI concern about China's involvement with US research
  • It comes as the coronavirus pandemic has already worsened US-China relations
  • Coronavirus symptoms: what are they and should you see a doctor?
By Amelia Wynne For Mailonline
Published: 16:48, 31 March 2020 | Updated: 19:44, 31 March 2020
The FBI warned of concerns over a 'biosecurity risk' from Chinese scientists' research in the US after they intercepted virus samples carried in luggage a year before the coronavirus outbreak.
In November 2018 - just over a year before the first coronavirus case was recorded in Wuhan - US customs at Detroit Metro Airport stopped a Chinese biologist with three samples labeled 'Antibodies' in his luggage.
He told border control that someone he worked with in China had asked him to deliver the vials to a researcher at a US institute.
After examining the writing on the vials, customs agents concluded that they believed the materials inside may have been MERS or SARS materials.
An unclassified FBI report obtained by Yahoo News said: 'Inspection of the writing on the vials and the stated recipient led inspection personnel to believe the materials contained within the vials may be viable Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) materials.'
The report - written by the Chemical and Biological Intelligence Unit of the FBI's Weapons of Mass Destruction Directorate - does not give the name of the Chinese scientist carrying the suspected samples, or the intended recipient in the US.
The WMPP assesses foreign scientific researchers who transport 'undeclared and undocumented' biological materials into the US that 'almost certainly present a biosecurity risk'.
The FBI concluded that the incident, along with two other cases mentioned in the report, were part of an alarming pattern.
It appears to be part of a larger FBI concern about China's involvement with scientific research in the US.
One professor of global biosecurity has said that the FBI appears to be concerned with research that would be used for bioterrorism.


  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Disease X


Great American Eclipse Forms an X


The EXACT midway point between the 2017/2024 eclipse dates is 14 Dec 2020.


On the date 14/12/2020 the Pfizer jab was introduced,manufactured in Chesterfield,Missouri.


(Also that day,a total eclipse crossed Chile and Argentina)


Chesterfield was under the totality shadow of 2017,and in the partial shadow of 2024.


(This info comes from Jason Breshears "Archaix" yt channel and I recommend anyone looking for answers watch his latest amazing report before it is memoryholed)

Edited by Fool Me Once
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any mention of the vax date and location is deleted from my yt comments,no matter how coded.


They are stifling any attempt to alert people of the facts.There is something nefarious coming from the jabs and it probably won't be long now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...