Jump to content

Disease X


Recommended Posts

Joe Biden launched ‘Orwellian Ministry of Truth’ to shut down Covid dissent, judge says

Court backs claims Biden administration had engaged in a ‘massive’ attempt to stop Americans questioning the efficacy of vaccines online

By Maighna Nanu 5 July 2023 • 2:43pm

Joe Biden launched an “Orwellian Ministry of Truth” to shut down Covid dissent during the pandemic, a US judge has said.

In a ruling issued on Tuesday, Terry Doughty, a Louisiana District Court Judge, backed claims that the US president’s administration had engaged in a “massive” attempt to stop Americans questioning the efficacy of vaccines online.

He also issued a temporary ban on federal officials and agencies from meeting with social media company executives for the purpose of removing First Amendment-protected speech.

“During the Covid-19 pandemic, a period perhaps best characterised by widespread doubt and uncertainty, the United States Government seems to have assumed a role similar to an Orwellian ‘Ministry of Truth’,” the judge, an appointee of former president Donald Trump, wrote in his 155-page opinion.

There was no immediate comment on the injunction from the White House, Google or Facebook. The measure can be appealed by the Biden administration at the New Orleans-based 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals, US news outlet Politico reported.


The ruling came after it was revealed last month that UK ministers set up a counter-disinformation unit which was used to target lockdown critics and those questioning the mass vaccination of children.

The UK Government used an artificial intelligence firm to monitor social media sites and flag opposition to vaccine passports.

Fedeal government involved in ‘censorship enterprise’

Prosecutors in the Republican states of Louisiana and Missouri brought the case and accused the federal government of being involved in a “censorship enterprise”.


  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites


By Dave Hodges June 21, 2023


The following are 30 population control quotes which show that the elite truly believe that humans are a plague upon the earth and that a great culling is necessary:

1. UK Television Presenter Sir David Attenborough: “We are a plague on the Earth. It’s coming home to roost over the next 50 years or so. It’s not just climate change; it’s sheer space, places to grow food for this enormous horde. Either we limit our population growth or the natural world will do it for us, and the natural world is doing it for us right now”

2. Paul Ehrlich, a former science adviser to president George W. Bush and the author of “The Population Bomb”: “To our minds, the fundamental cure, reducing the scale of the human enterprise (including the size of the population) to keep its aggregate consumption within the carrying capacity of Earth is obvious but too much neglected or denied”

3. Paul Ehrlich again, this time on the size of families: “Nobody, in my view, has the right to have 12 children or even three unless the second pregnancy is twins”

4. Dave Foreman, the co-founder of Earth First: “We humans have become a disease, the Humanpox.”

5. CNN Founder Ted Turner: “A total world population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.”

He was quoted saying: “We’re too many people; that’s why we have global warming.”

Unfortunately for him and other fervent depopulationists, both the overpopulation myth and the man-made global warming hoax, have been repeatedly debunked.

6. Japan’s Deputy Prime Minister Taro Aso about medical patients with serious illnesses: “You cannot sleep well when you think it’s all paid by the government. This won’t be solved unless you let them hurry up and die.”

7. David Rockefeller: “The negative impact of population growth on all of our planetary ecosystems is becoming appallingly evident.”

8. Environmental activist Roger Martin: “On a finite planet, the optimum population providing the best quality of life for all, is clearly much smaller than the maximum, permitting bare survival. The more we are, the less for each; fewer people mean better lives.”

9. HBO personality Bill Maher: “I’m pro-choice, I’m for assisted suicide, I’m for regular suicide, I’m for whatever gets the freeway moving – that’s what I’m for. It’s too crowded, the planet is too crowded and we need to promote death.”

10. MIT professor Penny Chisholm: “The real trick is, in terms of trying to level off at someplace lower than that 9 billion, is to get the birthrates in the developing countries to drop as fast as we can. And that will determine the level at which humans will level off on earth.”

11. Julia Whitty, a columnist for Mother Jones: “The only known solution to ecological overshoot is to decelerate our population growth faster than it’s decelerating now and eventually reverse it — at the same time we slow and eventually reverse the rate at which we consume the planet’s resources.

Success in these twin endeavors will crack our most pressing global issues: climate change, food scarcity, water supplies, immigration, health care, biodiversity loss, even war. On one front, we’ve already made unprecedented strides, reducing global fertility from an average 4.92 children per woman in 1950 to 2.56 today — an accomplishment of trial and sometimes brutally coercive error, but also a result of one woman at a time making her individual choices. The speed of this childbearing revolution, swimming hard against biological programming, rates as perhaps our greatest collective feat to date.”

12. Colorado State University Professor Philip Cafaro in a paper entitled “Climate Ethics and Population Policy”: “Ending human population growth is almost certainly a necessary (but not sufficient) condition for preventing catastrophic global climate change. Indeed, significantly reducing current human numbers may be necessary in order to do so.“

13. Professor of Biology at the University of Texas at Austin Eric R. Pianka: “I do not bear any ill will toward people. However, I am convinced that the world, including all humanity, WOULD clearly be much better off without so many of us.”

14. Detroit News Columnist Nolan Finley: “Since the national attention is on birth control, here’s my idea: If we want to fight poverty, reduce violent crime and bring down our embarrassing drop-out rate, we should swap contraceptives for fluoride in Michigan’s drinking water.

We’ve got a baby problem in Michigan. Too many babies are born to immature parents who don’t have the skills to raise them, too many are delivered by poor women who can’t afford them, and too many are fathered by sorry layabouts who spread their seed like dandelions and then wander away from the consequences.”

15. John Guillebaud, professor of family planning at University College London: “The effect on the planet of having one child less is an order of magnitude greater than all these other things we might do, such as switching off lights. An extra child is the equivalent of a lot of flights across the planet.”

16. Democrat strategist Steven Rattner: “WE need death panels. Well, maybe not death panels, exactly, but unless we start allocating health care resources more prudently — rationing, by its proper name — the exploding cost of Medicare will swamp the federal budget.”

17. Matthew Yglesias, a business and economics correspondent for Slate, in an article entitled “The Case for Death Panels, in One Chart”:

“But not only is this health care spending on the elderly the key issue in the federal budget, our disproportionate allocation of health care dollars to old people surely accounts for the remarkable lack of apparent cost effectiveness of the American health care system. When the patient is already over 80, the simple fact of the matter is that no amount of treatment is going to work miracles in terms of life expectancy or quality of life.”

18. Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger: “All of our problems are the result of overbreeding among the working class”

19. U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg: “Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.”

20. Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger: “The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”

21. Salon columnist Mary Elizabeth Williams in an article entitled “So What If Abortion Ends Life?”: “All life is not equal. That’s a difficult thing for liberals like me to talk about, lest we wind up looking like death-panel-loving, kill-your-grandma-and-your-precious-baby storm troopers. Yet a fetus can be a human life without having the same rights as the woman in whose body it resides.”

22. Alberto Giubilini of Monash University in Melbourne, Australia and Francesca Minerva of the University of Melbourne in a paper published in the Journal of Medical Ethics:

“[W]hen circumstances occur after birth such that they would have justified abortion, what we call after-birth abortion should be permissible. … [W]e propose to call this practice ‘after-birth abortion’, rather than ‘infanticide,’ to emphasize that the moral status of the individual killed is comparable with that of a fetus … rather than to that of a child.

“Therefore, we claim that killing a newborn could be ethically permissible in all the circumstances where abortion would be. Such circumstances include cases where the newborn has the potential to have an (at least) acceptable life, but the well-being of the family is at risk.”

23. Nina Fedoroff, a key adviser to Hillary Clinton: “We need to continue to decrease the growth rate of the global population; the planet can’t support many more people.”

24. Barack Obama’s primary science adviser, John P. Holdren: “A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men.

The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births.”

25. David Brower, the first Executive Director of the Sierra Club: “Childbearing [should be] a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license … All potential parents [should be] required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing.”

26. Thomas Ferguson, former official in the U.S. State Department Office of Population Affairs: “There is a single theme behind all our work–we must reduce population levels. Either governments do it our way, through nice clean methods, or they will get the kinds of mess that we have in El Salvador, or in Iran or in Beirut. Population is a political problem. Once population is out of control, it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it…”

27. Mikhail Gorbachev: “We must speak more clearly about sexuality, contraception, about abortion, about values that control population, because the ecological crisis, in short, is the population crisis. Cut the population by 90% and there aren’t enough people left to do a great deal of ecological damage.”

28. Jacques Costeau: “In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it is just as bad not to say it.”

29. Finnish environmentalist Pentti Linkola: “If there were a button I could press, I would sacrifice myself without hesitating if it meant millions of people would die”

30. Prince Phillip, husband of Queen Elizabeth II and co-founder of the World Wildlife Fund: “In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation.”


Edited by Macnamara
Link to comment
Share on other sites

U.S. DOD issued contract for ‘COVID-19 Research’ in Ukraine in 2019

Published: July 11, 2023
The Government of the United States has a website called ‘USA Spending‘, an official open data source of federal spending information. According to the site as of 12th April 2021 the US Government has spent a mind-blowing $3.63 trillion “in response to COVID-19”. But that’s not the only information on Covid that can be found within the site.

Hidden within the ‘Award Search’ are details on a contract awarded by the Department of Defense to a company named ‘Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp‘, which is allegedly “a global engineering, procurement, consulting and construction company specialising in infrastructure development”.

The contact was awarded on September 20th, 2012 and is described as “Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services”. Obviously this is very vague and most likely of little interest to anyone who happens to stumble across it. But there is something contained deep within the details that should be of interest to anyone and everyone.

But there is one Sub-Award that stands out among the rest, and it is was awarded to Labyrinth Global Health INC for “SME Manuscript Documentation and COVID-19 Research”.

An award for Covid-19 research isn’t exactly shocking when the world is allegedly in the grip of a Covid-19 pandemic, but considering the fact the sub-contract was awarded 12th November 2019, at least one month before the alleged emergence of the novel coronavirus, and three months before it was officially dubbed Covid-19, the award for Covid-19 research should come as a shock to everyone.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Shocking ONS Report: COVID Vaccinated 18-39 Age Group at 91% Higher Death Risk than Unvaccinated Peers in UK

Official figures published by the UK’s Office for National Statistics show that deaths per 100,000 among double vaccinated 18-39-year-olds were on average 91% higher than deaths per 100,000 among unvaccinated 18-39-year-olds between January 2021 and January 2022.

This means it can no longer be denied that the Covid-19 vaccines are deadly because even the official Government published figures prove it.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

British scientists are primed to create the next pandemic vaccine in 100 days as super-lab Porton Down develops prototypes to tackle 'Disease X' - with bird flu, tuberculosis and monkeypox on the radar

By Kate Pickles Health Editor and Chris Matthews

Updated: 06:38 EDT, 7 August 2023


  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Is something being tested at that base or are the covid jab chickens coming home to roost?

Tinker Air Force Base deaths: 17 people dead in 2023, military refuses to reveal causes

  • An Air Force base in Oklahoma is tight-lipped after 17 people have died on the base since the beginning of 2023 
  • Officials for the Air Force and the base have refused to reveal the nature of the deaths, saying only that there were 'various causes' 
  • An investigation suggested 'deaths connected to base this year including potential suicides.' 

By Stephen M. Lepore For Dailymail.Com

Published: 21:19 EDT, 16 August 2023 | Updated: 09:16 EDT, 17 August 2023

An Air Force base in Oklahoma is tight-lipped after 17 people have died since the beginning of 2023, with an advocate for military families saying she'd made inquiries about a possible rash of suicides. 

Officials for the Air Force and the base have refused to reveal the nature of the deaths, saying only that there were 'various causes.'

DailyMail.com has reached out to the base for an explanation or names of the personnel who have died - but officials did not respond in time for this report. 


  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

that fusing of the law enforcement agencies sounds a lot like the 'fusion doctrine' being advance in the UK:

Todd Callender: A Marburg pandemic could be caused by lipid nanoparticles releasing the virus into vaccinated people using 5G as the trigger

During a recent discussion with Man in America host Seth Holehouse, Todd Callender warned that covid was round one and was setting the stage for round two. Round two could be far worse than covid because it potentially relates to the contents of the covid “vaccines” which, using 5G as the trigger, could release the next pandemic.

Using patents and government research, Callender explained to Holehouse that using 5G to trigger the release of a previously injected pathogen has already been explored and tested, and in the US the legal instruments to deal with a Marburg pandemic are already in place.

The US Congress published a notice in the Federal Register on 9 December 2020 to declare a Marburg pandemic:

“I think there have been 10 Marburg deaths over 40 years so this is not what you could call a pandemic.  But nonetheless, the Secretary of Health Human Services saw fit to make such a declaration way back in 2020,” Callender said. “We are, according to our own government, in the middle of a Marburg pandemic.”

The US government declared the “Marburg pandemic” not because there is a pandemic but because it suspends the American Constitution, and the right to informed consent and not to be experimented on with “vaccines.”

With covid, the declaration of a national health emergency suspended the Constitution and effectively placed Americans under martial law, Callender explained.  The declaration of a public health emergency suspended our human rights such as the prohibition of medical experiments on people without informed consent. “[With covid] they experimented on us without consent because our human rights … were suspended,” he said.

In the second half of his discussion with Holehouse, Callender discussed the Bureau of Justice’s initiative ‘The Role of Law Enforcement in Public Health Emergencies’.  An initiative that was launched shortly after the World Health Organisation’s 2005 International Health Regulations were adopted.

The US Department of Justice created the Bureau of Justice which combines four different law enforcement agencies.  When a public health emergency is declared, “law enforcement, public health, corrections (that’s jail) and the judiciary (that’s our courts) all become one under the Bureau of Justice,” Callender said.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

my concern is that if they can in fact trigger something that they have injected into people they could actually create the perception of a real pandemic as people would really be collapsing in the street and if they could cause that level of panic who knows what the ignorati would let them get away with....

The next pandemic is already coming and it could kill millions more than Covid. We need to prepare for it now... writes experts KATE BINGHAM and TIM HAMES

By Kate Bingham and Tim Hames

Published: 18:07 EDT, 22 September 2023 | Updated: 21:57 EDT, 22 September 2023

The next major pandemic is coming. It’s already on the horizon, and could be far worse — killing millions more people — than the last one.

We don’t yet know for certain what form it will take — just that its arrival, according to global health experts, is not just a possibility but a probability.

That’s horrific enough. Even more terrifying is the fact that Britain and the rest of the world have so far done very little to prepare for it.

To combat Disease X — as the World Health Organisation ominously calls it — we will once again need vaccines to be engineered and delivered in record time. But, as things stand, there is absolutely no guarantee that will happen.

By contrast, we may well look back at the Covid-19 crisis as a walk in the park — and of course it was nothing of the kind.

Today, it’s all too easy to forget that governments around the world were dangerously unprepared for a global health crisis; indeed many viewed it as the stuff of apocalyptic fiction.



Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

A who's who of covid conspirators:

The Faces & Names of the 150 Bilderbergers who controlled the COVID-19 “Pandemic” response

Over 150 Bilderbergers (of the 1,861 who are still alive) have played important parts in the Covid-19 event. Many, perhaps most, of the below have been active in various roles; this page attempts to name and shame them and reveal the roles they have played.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

The FDA’s Ties to the Gates Foundation

By Maryanne Demasi   October 20, 2023
In 2017, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) entered into a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Under the MOU, the two entities agreed to share information to “facilitate the development of innovative products, including medical countermeasures,” such as diagnostics, vaccines, and therapeutics to combat disease transmission during a pandemic.

The FDA has MOUs with many academic and non-profit organisations, but few have as much to gain as Bill Gates, who has invested billions into pandemic countermeasures.

Experts are concerned the Gates Foundation could have undue influence over the FDA’s regulatory decisions of these countermeasures.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Britain's secret biosecurity blunders revealed - including LOSING a genetically-modified mouse and an experiment gone wrong involving a smallpox-like virus

By John Ely Senior Health Reporter For Mailonline

Published: 05:45 EDT, 20 October 2023 | Updated: 09:19 EDT, 20 October 2023

British researchers lost a genetically modified mouse and accidentally released a smallpox-like pathogen in a string of biosecurity blunders kept under wraps.

MailOnline has learned of six lab incidents where genetically modified organisms (GMO) have escaped containment in the past five years. 

Four occurred before Covid swept the globe, according to our Freedom of Information (FOI) request. 

Research involving genetically-modified pathogens has come under huge scrutiny since the pandemic kicked off, with some believing Covid was spawned by similar, controversial experiments.

It has prompted calls for tougher regulation on studies involving intentionally altering viruses and bacteria.



  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Central Nervous System (CNS) Vasculitis: Blood Vessel Inflammation in the Brain Caused by COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines

Confirmed by a new September 2023 Japanese study by Ariyoshi, et. al.

Global Research, October 19, 2023
COVID Intel 18 October 2023

My Take…

This is evidence of INFLAMMATION IN THE BRAIN, caused by COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines.

And the Morz paper showed spike protein in the blood vessel walls causing CNS vasculitis.

Please note how difficult it is to get this diagnosis (2 of the 4 cases I present were made by Neurology specialists at the Mayo Clinic)

This mRNA vaccine injury manifests by strokes or seizures (or both).

Now think of the thousands of young people who are having unexplained strokes (or seizures).

How many of them have post mRNA Vaccine inflammation in the brain and cannot get a proper diagnosis?

Also consider that I provided proof, in this article, of one of the very few COVID-19 Vaccine exemptions ever issued by a Canadian provincial government.


  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No SNP ministers were present for andrew bridgen's debate on the excess deaths either....and they pretend to care about the scottish people!

Scottish government accused of withholding Covid WhatsApps

Published 15 hours ago

By Megan Bonar
BBC Scotland News

The Scottish government has been accused of not handing over WhatsApp messages to the UK Covid Inquiry.

Jamie Dawson KC, the counsel to the inquiry, also said it was "surprising" that so many messages from politicians and officials had been deleted.

First Minister Humza Yousaf said he took Mr Dawson's comments "very seriously" and would investigate.

He also pledged that "all relevant information" of any type will be handed over.

Mr Yousaf, who became health secretary in 2021 while pandemic restrictions were still in place, said his statement to the inquiry was over 100 pages long.

Speaking at a session of the inquiry in London, Mr Dawson said witness statements from key decisions makers suggested that informal communications such as WhatsApp, texts, Microsoft Teams and Signal were used to discuss the Scottish government's Covid response during the pandemic.

It has now emerged that there were at least 137 message groups that were being used, he added.

The inquiry therefore asked 70 individuals for their messages, as well as information on what groups they were members of and if such groups still existed or not and why some messages were deleted.

Mr Dawson said: "A clear theme of the overall response received from and via the Scottish government is that although such messaging systems were used in the pandemic response, including by some key decision makers and others, generally very few messages appear to have been retained.

"This is surprising, in particular, in light of the apparent availability of such messages in high volumes within the UK government."

Humza Yousaf may have renewed a pledge to handover "all relevant information" to the official pandemic inquiries.

But it is far from clear that either the UK or Scottish investigations will get everything they want from the Scottish government.

Why not? Because the UK inquiry has already established that while informal messaging was used by some of those handling the Scottish response to Covid-19, "generally very few messages appear to have been retained".

While the Scottish government insists it does not operate a culture of making decisions via WhatsApp, the inquiry teams would like to be in a position to judge for themselves.

In an effort to preserve evidence, the Scottish inquiry issued a "do not destroy" order at the start of August 2022 and it could be an offence for witnesses to have deleted Covid-related messages after that date.

It is less clear what, if anything, could be done about anyone who might have operated a policy of delete-as-you-go throughout the pandemic.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

An explosive new study describing “unintended immune responses” from mRNA injections has dropped a tactical nuke on Pfizer

Here’s the simple version. The researchers discovered that a necessary ingredient in the mRNA vaccines, 1-methylpseudouridine, has an unfortunate side-effect; it messes up RNA translation one-third of the time by slipping a gear every so often. Instead of making the intended spike protein, these tiny mis-translational slip-ups create … other things. Other kinds of proteins. New ones.

And there’s no way at all to predict what kind of protein it will create.  It’s stochastic – completely random.

The “vaccine” creates stochastic proteins one third of the time. In one-third of cells, not people, like The Telegraph again misreported. There are trillions of mRNA packages in each shot. So – unless I’m missing something – what the study is saying, without actually saying it, is that this is happening inside every single jab recipient.

Let’s recap the four major jab low-lights – all from just this year:

  1. In February, Kevin McKernan brilliantly discovered unexpected DNA plasmid contamination in the mRNA shots.
  2. Kevin equally brilliantly discovered something hiding in plain sight that apparently every other scientist on the planet – including the FDA – somehow missed: The mRNA shots unexpectedly include parts of an oncogenic simian virus (associated with cancer).
  3. In August, I reported on a study showing the way spike protein, and thus the shots, cause autoimmune problems by unexpectedly binding to C4 immune cells, in my post titled, JACKPOT Tuesday, 8 August 2023, C&C NEWS.
  4. Then yesterday, in this newest study, we learned about the fourth major, unexpected problem with the jabs, which goes to their very design – random protein production.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/24/2023 at 7:18 PM, Mikhail Liebestein said:

Working on some new candidates 


Chinese scientists discover EIGHT never-before-seen viruses... and now they plan to experiment with them






New candidates for the holy grail? 

At least ONE of them could be the solution to that pesky problem of people, living, on the earth. How dare they! How dare those humans live! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Biodefense in the Age of Synthetic Biology.

Assessment of Concerns Related to Bioweapons that Alter the Human Host

While we typically think about biodefense in terms of either pathogens (Chapter 4) or biochemicals (Chapter 5), technological advances are now making possible additional capabilities and means of attack that are more closely related to the human body itself. The study included consideration of how increased knowledge about the microbiome and immune system may enable new means of delivering an agent; the potential for incursions into the human host through means not typical of pathogens or toxin-based bioweapons, such as through genetic modification; and how genes themselves may potentially be used as weapons. While some of these potential activities overlap with the activities discussed in previous chapters, it is valuable to consider them from a host-centric angle to assess how advances in knowledge and biotechnology tools might further alter the landscape of vulnerabilities and weapons available for exploitation by malicious actors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so....we know that the claim the jabs saved millions of lives is bunk because the evidence shows that the unjabbed people weren't dying at the same rate as the jabbed...

The Nonsense Claim That Covid Vaccines Saved 20 Million Lives

Clearly, the unvaccinated weren’t dying at a disproportionate rate to the vaccinated. The Imperial claim of 20 million saved lives is nonsense. The very real questions over why so many people are dying remain very much open.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination and the Multi-Hit Hypothesis of Oncogenesis

Published: December 17, 2023
After reviewing the available literature, we are particularly concerned that certain COVID-19 vaccines may generate a pro-tumorigenic milieu (i.e., a specific environment that could lead to neoplastic transformation) that predisposes some (stable) oncologic patients and survivors to cancer progression, recurrence, and/or metastasis. This hypothesis is based on biological plausibility and fulfillment of the multi-hit hypothesis of oncogenesis (i.e., induction of lymphopenia and inflammation, downregulation of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) expression, activation of oncogenic cascades, sequestration of tumor suppressor proteins, dysregulation of the RNA-G quadruplex-protein binding system, alteration of type I interferon responses, unsilencing of retrotransposable elements, etc.) together with growing evidence and safety reports filed to Vaccine Adverse Effects Report System (VAERS) suggesting that some cancer patients experienced disease exacerbation or recurrence following COVID-19 vaccination. In light of the above and because some of these concerns (i.e., alteration of oncogenic pathways, promotion of inflammatory cascades, and dysregulation of the renin-angiotensin system) also apply to cancer patients infected with SARS-CoV-2, we encourage the scientific and medical community to urgently evaluate the impact of both COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccination on cancer biology and tumor registries, adjusting public health recommendations accordingly.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

The names & faces of the 150 Bilderbergers who manipulated the COVID-19 Pandemic response

Over 150 Bilderbergers (of the 1,861 who are still alive) have played important parts in the Covid-19 event. Many, perhaps most, of the below have been active in various roles; this page attempts to name and shame them and reveal the roles they have played.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Are There US Quarantine Camps Right Now?

By Jeffrey A. Tucker   January 10, 2024
Two years ago, attorney and Brownstone Fellow Bobbie Anne Flower Cox took note of the New York State executive order to permit the building and use of quarantine camps. The litigation against it is still in process. We might have supposed it was an outlying case. That, sadly, is not true. 

“The U.S. Department of Defense selected Omaha and four other sites; the announcement was made Wednesday by Nebraska’s congressional delegation. The project will be led by the Department of Defense in coordination with the Department of Health and Human Services, other partner agencies include the Veterans Administration, Department of Homeland Security, and Department of Transportation.”

That’s a lot of deep state action right there. 

Where are these other sites? So far as we can tell, they are Washington State (with some controversy), Orange County, California (“Health Center”), Tennessee, and one other we cannot find, but it surely includes New York State by now. No city government would likely turn down a federal contract worth millions and billions. 

The history of the abuse of the quarantine power gives rise to chilling examples. Indeed, there is not a huge distance between quarantine power, quarantine camps, detention centers, internment camps, and concentration camps. They are all based on the state power to name a person or group as a threat, politically or therapeutically, and uproot them by force. 


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...