Jump to content

Disease X


Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, Youknownothingbutyou said:

Im sure thats their plan


but in the context of the video, it was edited and mashed up. That frog mentioning 50%, if i remember correctly, was about making sure 50% more people on the planet has access to satan’s juice


can you provide extended footage to explain why he was talking about rolling out covid vaccines in 2019 BEFORE there was even a 'pandemic'?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

PfizerGate: Tragic Truth Behind COVID Vaccines in the U.K.: 47,379 Excess Deaths in 8 Months Due to Vaccination

Global Research, January 02, 2023
The Expose 26 December 2022

As the death toll rises, a dark shadow has been cast over Britain.

Official data reveals that since April 2022, 407,910 deaths have occurred, with 47,379 excess deaths against the 2015-2019 five-year average.

As the investigation deepens, it has become increasingly clear that the Covid-19 vaccines are the most likely cause of the unprecedented loss of life in Britain. The evidence is damning, with a startling correlation between the rollout of the vaccines and the spike in deaths.

We were told the vaccines would bring hope and healing in the midst of an alleged global pandemic. But now, it seems that they have instead brought even more devastation and pain.

The Office for National Statistics has released weekly figures on deaths registered in England and Wales, and the most recent data reveals a troubling increase.

In the week ending on December 11th, there were 11,694 deaths, with 687 excess deaths against the 2016-2019 + 2021 five-year average and 999 excess deaths against the 2015-2019 five-year average.

While Covid-19 is often blamed for such increases, this time the numbers tell a different story. Out of all the deaths, only 326 were attributed to the alleged disease – a mere 2.8%.

So what is causing this surge in fatalities?



Meanwhile, according to Public Health Scotland (PHS), Scotland suffered 1,257 deaths in the week ending 27th November, resulting in 127 excess deaths.



  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Major boost for mRNA vaccines targeting ‘Disease X’

Cepi has invested in a project to develop cheaper, more effective shots with fewer side effects

By Sarah Newey, Global Health Security Correspondent 13 January 2023 • 11:11am

Efforts to develop a next generation of mRNA vaccines capable of targeting Disease X – an as yet unknown pathogen with pandemic potential – have received a multi-million cash injection.

The Coalition of Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (Cepi) has announced $2m (£1.64m) of funding for Tiba Biotech, an American pharmaceutical company with promising new RNA technology which may be cheaper, more effective and triggers fewer side effects.

The development of mRNA vaccines was a major success story during Covid, and billions of doses have been administered across the globe. But scientists are racing to develop new and improved jabs which offer “substantial advantages” in tackling Disease X, existing or emerging pathogens with the potential to spark the next pandemic.

Current mRNA vaccines have to be kept at super-cool temperatures, complicating distribution in some lower-income countries, and are reactogenic – meaning they produce slight side effects, including fever or small reactions, in some patients.


Cepi, which has a track record of backing successful vaccine candidates, has bet on the technology from Tiba Biotech to solve some of these issues.

Existing mRNA vaccines coat slithers of mRNA code – the molecules which prompt human cells to make Sars-Cov-2 antibodies, triggering a protective immune response – in lipid nanoparticles, tiny balls of fat which protect the fragile genetic instructions as they are delivered to cells.

However, these balls of fat are slightly inflammatory – which contributes to localised side effects. Tiba Biotech is developing an alternative delivery route: biodegradable RNA nanoparticles, which do not need to be encased in lipids.

The company believes these can be stored for long periods in a fridge at four degrees, ending the need for ultra-cool cold chain infrastructure that has limited rollout in some regions.

It also says the organic molecules are potentially less inflammatory, which could enhance their performance and reduce side effects.

Dr Richard Hatchett, chief executive of Cepi, said that although mRNA shots delivered a “revolution in vaccinology” during the pandemic, “there is scope to substantially improve the technology to make it more effective and accessible”.

“We are excited by Tiba Biotech’s nanoparticle approach which we think may reduce adverse reactions and improve the thermostability of mRNA vaccines,” he added. “Such advantages would make mRNA vaccines easier to use and potentially increase their accessibility and acceptability in many countries.”

The latest seed funding will be used to support the design, development and preclinical evaluation of a vaccine candidate for Japanese encephalitis, a brain infection spread by mosquitoes.

If the data generated is successful, the collaboration could be expanded to develop shots against pathogens with pandemic potential, or ‘Disease X’. This is part of Cepi’s $3.5 billion plan to create a library of prototype vaccines, so jabs can be rapidly developed and rolled out if threatening new diseases emerge.

“This initial focus on [Japanese encephalitis] is just the start to developing, expanding and enhancing RNA vaccine rapid-response capabilities against known and unknown threats,” said Dr Christian Mandl, co-founder and Chief Scientific Officer of Tiba Biotech.

“We are confident the collaboration with Cepi will demonstrate the unique advantages of our... delivery platform in producing safe and effective mRNA vaccines for the global community.” 


  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/18/2020 at 12:05 AM, Guest said:
**Note .... linked page is gone, but must have been before 2019.

High Level 'bio-defence' government agency created for the event of a pandemic

A couple weeks ago, it was revealed that the US government is currently focusing on biological warfare and supposedly, the threat that some weaponized disease, bacteria, or virus could pose to the country.

A whole new, cabinet level (high level) government agency has just been created: a "steering committee" that directs the HHS, Department of Health and Human Services, to "take the coordinating lead" pertaining to this issue, according to one article.

The article continues, "Some experts are praising the broad scope of the strategy, new elements that it covers, and the high-level attention and oversight built into the plan."

The White House press briefing that describes this plan notes that this government agency will work very closely with the existing Department of Homeland Security and other agencies, connecting them more, which will surely make the government"s power differential against the people more of a scary thing.

"The biodefense National Security Presidential Memorandum names the Secretary of Health and Human Services, Alex Azar, as the Federal lead for biodefense and establishes a Cabinet-level Biodefense Steering Committee," the press release says.

President Trump spoke on the biological warfare agency, saying:

"Taken together, they represent a new direction in the Nation"s defense against biological threats," referring to the steps being taken with the new agency. "They have great potential to disrupt the economy, exact a toll on human life, and tear at the very fabric of society," he said, speaking on biological warfare threats. "My Administration will take steps to improve our understanding of the risks posed by biological threats and to respond to them effectively and efficiently."

https://edge-canopy.com/2018/10/02/high ... -pandemic/


the pirate council created this thread on the original david icke forum in 2018 to speculate about the nature of a coming 'disease x' and how that would play into bill gates depopulation agenda. The thread has also speculated about the role of the military in the whole scheme and now more information about that is leaking out:



Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/18/2020 at 12:15 AM, Guest said:
Covid 19: A Review Part 7

Is Britain now effectively under military control?

10,000 extra troops to join British army's Covid support force
MoD doubles size of force amid fears over ability of police and NHS to cope with crisis
Haroon Siddique and Robert Booth

Wed 18 Mar 2020 22.30 GMT
Specialist military planners are also being deployed to steer local responses to the pandemic and tackle rising pressure on care homes, after a request by the communities secretary, Robert Jenrick.
There are fears about the ability of the police and NHS, which are both already at full stretch, to deal with the scale of the crisis. While the government has been reluctant to highlight such a bleak prospect, the armed forces need to be prepared for the threat of a breakdown in civil order given that troops have been deployed in other countries to enforce lockdowns and prevent looting of shops.
Up to 70 non-uniformed military personnel with crisis planning expertise are being sent to all 38 local resilience forums, to "test planning and identify weaknesses", defence sources said.

Local resilience forums are normally made up of councils, NHS bodies, emergency services and the environment agency. The military planners joining them are described as experts in coordinating resources in a crisis, which in the care system will mean bolstering already stretched operations.
Jenrick asked for an increase in military help, specifically highlighting the need to "support local authority elements of Covid-19 response plans, including social care".
The Standing Joint Command HQ in Aldershot, Hampshire, will serve as the command and control structure for the Covid support force.
The military was recently involved in civil contingency work when called on to support the government"s response to flooding.

Meanwhile in the US more evidence emerges of the movement of dangerous pathogens back and forth between the americas and china in the luggage of scientists. How come I couldn't get my shaving foam through customs and yet scientists are taking deadly pathogens back and forth?
FBI warned of concerns over 'biosecurity risk' from Chinese scientists' research in the US after intercepting Sars virus and flu samples illicitly carried in their luggage a year before coronavirus outbreak
  • Customs at Detroit Airport stopped Chinese biologist with samples on way to lab
  • It forms part of a larger FBI concern about China's involvement with US research
  • It comes as the coronavirus pandemic has already worsened US-China relations
  • Coronavirus symptoms: what are they and should you see a doctor?
By Amelia Wynne For Mailonline
Published: 16:48, 31 March 2020 | Updated: 19:44, 31 March 2020
The FBI warned of concerns over a 'biosecurity risk' from Chinese scientists' research in the US after they intercepted virus samples carried in luggage a year before the coronavirus outbreak.
In November 2018 - just over a year before the first coronavirus case was recorded in Wuhan - US customs at Detroit Metro Airport stopped a Chinese biologist with three samples labeled 'Antibodies' in his luggage.
He told border control that someone he worked with in China had asked him to deliver the vials to a researcher at a US institute.
After examining the writing on the vials, customs agents concluded that they believed the materials inside may have been MERS or SARS materials.
An unclassified FBI report obtained by Yahoo News said: 'Inspection of the writing on the vials and the stated recipient led inspection personnel to believe the materials contained within the vials may be viable Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) materials.'
The report - written by the Chemical and Biological Intelligence Unit of the FBI's Weapons of Mass Destruction Directorate - does not give the name of the Chinese scientist carrying the suspected samples, or the intended recipient in the US.
The WMPP assesses foreign scientific researchers who transport 'undeclared and undocumented' biological materials into the US that 'almost certainly present a biosecurity risk'.
The FBI concluded that the incident, along with two other cases mentioned in the report, were part of an alarming pattern.
It appears to be part of a larger FBI concern about China's involvement with scientific research in the US.
One professor of global biosecurity has said that the FBI appears to be concerned with research that would be used for bioterrorism.


its looking like YES this whole thing HAS been a military operation throughout


so now we have to question if the migrant invasion is also a military operation?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Macnamara said:


its looking like YES this whole thing HAS been a military operation throughout


so now we have to question if the migrant invasion is also a military operation?


Totally. Many of the migrants are Charle's private mercenary army in waiting. There is no way he would trust the British army to deal with the British people. If it comes out it will be his undoing.



Edited by Freaky Dragonfly
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Freaky Dragonfly said:

Totally. Many of the migrants are Charle's private mercenary army in waiting. There is no way he would trust the British army to deal with the British people. If it comes out it will be his undoing.


i just wonder what the event would be that would require a mercenary army? Could they be about to take us back into the EU? Is the economy about to collapse? Its all very sinister

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Artificial intelligence could be misused to design biological weapons, warn scientists after their AI came up with 40,000 potentially toxic drugs in just six hours

By Stephen Adams Medical Editor

Published: 01:56 GMT, 12 February 2023 | Updated: 02:10 GMT, 12 February 2023

Artificial intelligence could be misused to design highly toxic chemical and biological weapons, warn scientists.

The computer algorithms are a force for good, identifying new forms of antibiotics and medicine to combat Covid infection.

But four researchers involved in AI-based drug discovery have now found that the technology could easily be manipulated to search for toxic nerve agents.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Where’s the Outrage as Biden Will Sign Away Our Sovereignty to Tedros Next Week?

The Pandemic Treaty was big news last year until it was "defeated." But it wasn't actually defeated and now it's about to be signed by Joe Biden. Why is nobody talking about it?

One Health Surveillance’ and Misinformation

The WHO pandemic agreement calls for member states to implement “One Health surveillance.” One Health is a concept that has been embraced by the UN, the CDC, the World Bank, and other global organizations.

“The term originally meant a way of seeing human and animal health as linked—they sometimes are—so that you could improve human health by acting more broadly,” Bell said. “It has become hijacked and now is used to claim that all human activities, and all issues within the biosphere, affect health, and are therefore within Public Health’s remit. So public health can be deemed to include climate, or racism, or fisheries management, and this is being used to claim that addressing carbon emissions is a health issue and therefore a health ‘emergency.’”

The WHO zero draft states that “‘One Health surveillance’ means …,” leaving the definition to be worked out in future drafts. Whatever One Health surveillance ultimately entails, however, the signatories must invest in it, implement it, and “strengthen” it. In September 2022, the World Bank approved a Financial Intermediary Fund (FIF) to finance, among other things, One Health surveillance.

Signatories also agree to support the official narrative when it comes to information about a pandemic. Specifically, they will “conduct regular social listening and analysis to identify the prevalence and profiles of misinformation” and “design communications and messaging strategies for the public to counteract misinformation, disinformation and false news, thereby strengthening public trust.”


Link to comment
Share on other sites

RFK Jr :138 Companies Involved in COVID Vaccine. “They’re all military contractors.”

RFK Jr. confirms the work of Sasha Latypova and Katherine Watt

Global Research, February 24, 2023
Forbidden Knowledge TV 23 February 2023

RFK Jr says,

“There were 138 companies that were involved in manufacturing and distributing the vaxxine. They’re all military contractors. The Pentagon and the National Security Agency ran the entire pandemic response.

“Pfizer and Moderna don’t really own those vaxxines. They slap their labels on ’em but it was a Pentagon project.”

This confirms the work of Sasha Latypova and Katherine Watt, who showed how the Pentagon’s Operation Warp Speed was able to completely circumvent Federal Health Regulations by using what’s called in bureaucratic-speak, an “Other Transaction Authority”, which they used to contract with the bioweapons manufacturers to literally produce the bioweapon.

This was discovered in Pfizer’s motion to dismiss Brook Jackson’s case, when they attached another contract called an Other Transaction Authority  – OTA contract – saying in effect, they had no obligation to conduct valid clinical trials because the only goods and services they were providing to the US government, according to this contract are a “large scale manufacturing demonstration for a prototype”.

Under the terms of the OTA, Pfizer may have had no obligation to conduct a valid clinical trial or to be in compliance with any of the regulations that govern clinical trials. In other words, OTA did for the financial contracting side, what EUA did to the drug regulation side.

In short, the fake “clinical trials” were a PSYOP to convince people to get the injections.


New document reveals scope and structure of Operation Warp Speed and underscores vast military involvement

By Nicholas Florko Sept. 28, 2020

When President Trump unveiled Operation Warp Speed in May, he declared that it was “unlike anything our country has seen since the Manhattan Project.”

The initiative — to accelerate the development of Covid-19 vaccines and therapeutics — lacks the scale, and the degree of secrecy, of the effort to build the atomic bomb. But Operation Warp Speed is largely an abstraction in Washington, with little known about who works there other than its top leaders, or how it operates. Even pharmaceutical companies hoping to offer help or partnerships have labored to figure out who to contact.

Now, an organizational chart of the $10 billion initiative, obtained by STAT, reveals the fullest picture yet of Operation Warp Speed: a highly structured organization in which military personnel vastly outnumber civilian scientists.


  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

IG Probe Launched to Investigate Possible Theft of U.S. Taxpayer Funds For Wuhan Lab Research Projects

March 13, 2023

An inspector general probe has been launched to investigate the potential theft of U.S. government grants that funded research projects at the Wuhan lab in China, CBS News reported Monday.

National Institutes of Health (NIH) and U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) funneled potentially millions of U.S. taxpayer payer dollars through Dr. Peter Daszak’s non-profit  EcoHealth Alliance to the CCP-controlled Wuhan Institute of Virology.

“What I’ve found so far is evidence that points to double billing, potential theft of government funds,” said Diane Cutler, a former federal investigator with over two decades of experience combating white-collar crime and healthcare fraud. “It is concerning, especially since it involves dangerous pathogens and risky research,” she added.

Senator Roger Marshall (R-Kans.) hired Cutler to investigate U.S. government grants that supported risky gain-of-function research in China leading up to the COVID-19 pandemic. This type of research involves making pathogens and viruses more lethal and virulent in a laboratory, purportedly to study them.

Cutler took her evidence to the USAID Inspector General, which has reportedly launched a new probe.

She told CBS News she has viewed over 50,000 documents, and it looks like the U.S. government may have “made duplicate payments for possible medical supplies, equipment, travel and salaries.”

A spokesperson for USAID declined to comment. A USAID inspector general spokesperson declined to comment “on the existence of a specific open investigation.” The press office for NIH did not respond to CBS News’ questions.

Sources told CBS News the investigation of possible double-billing could take at least six months to conclude.

Sen. Marshall, a physician who practiced medicine for more than 25 years, said he is  calling for a 9/11-style commission.



Peter Daszak is a British zoologist, consultant and public expert on disease ecology, in particular on zoonosis. He is the president of EcoHealth Alliance, a nonprofit non-governmental organization that supports various programs on global health and pandemic prevention

Daszak was involved in investigations into the initial outbreak which eventually developed into the COVID-19 pandemic[5] and became a member of the World Health Organization team sent to investigate the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic in China. This became controversial due to Daszak's previous activities with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, perceived by some[6][7] as a conflict of interest.

Starting in 2014, Daszak was Principal Investigator of a six-year NIH project which was awarded to the EcoHealth Alliance and which focused on the emergence of novel zoonotic coronaviruses with a bat origin.[12] Among the aims of the project was to characterize the diversity and distribution of Severe acute respiratory syndrome–related coronavirus (SARSr-CoV) in bats, viruses with a significant risk of spillover, in southern China, based on data from spike protein sequences, infectious clone technology, infection experiments (both in vitro and in vivo), as well as analysis of receptor binding.[13] The six 1-year projects received $3.75 million in funding from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), part of the U.S. National Institutes of Health agency.

After the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, Daszak noted in The New York Times that he and other disease ecologists had warned the WHO in 2018 that the next pandemic "would be caused by an unknown, novel pathogen that hadn't yet entered the human population", probably in a region with significant human-animal interaction.[25] The group had named this hypothetical pathogen "Disease X"; it was included on a list of eight diseases which they recommended should be given highest priority in regard to research and development efforts, such as finding better diagnostic methods and developing vaccines.[26] He said, "As the world stands today on the edge of the pandemic precipice, it's worth taking a moment to consider whether Covid-19 is the disease our group was warning about."

In 2020 Daszak was named by the World Health Organization as the sole U.S.-based representative on a team sent to investigate the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic,[44] a team that also included Marion Koopmans, Hung Nguyen, and Fabian Leendertz.[44] Daszak had previously collaborated for many years with Shi Zhengli, the director of the Wuhan Institute of Virology,[45] on efforts to trace SARSr-CoV viruses to bats after the 2002–2004 SARS outbreak.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

COVID-19 Not Responsible for “Explosion” in Heart Deaths, Major Autopsy Study Shows. “Must Be the Vaccine,” Says Top Heart Doctor

Since the early days of the pandemic there has been a concern that SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans could cause heart inflammation and thus cardiac injury and death. A number of observational studies have appeared to show increased heart problems following infection, though the observational nature of these studies has led to criticism they are confounded and unreliable. Other studies have not found an increase in heart problems following Covid infection and have established that myocarditis was not above baseline in 2020.

Now the lack of relationship between COVID-19 and heart inflammation has been confirmed in a systematic review of 50 autopsy studies covering 548 hearts of patients who died of or with COVID-19. While around two thirds of the hearts had SARS-CoV-2 found in the tissue, none had extensive myocarditis as the cause of death. Top heart doctor Peter McCullough comments on the study – which was published last year – that it “should be the nail in the coffin in ruling out COVID-19 illness as a cause of fatal myocarditis”.

“Despite the virus being found in heart tissue, it was not causing significant inflammation,” he said.

This means that the “explosion of fatal myocarditis” as inferred from the reports and autopsies of unexplained cardiac arrest, “must have another explanation than SARS-CoV-2 infection,” he added.

“The only new proven cause of heart damage in human populations is COVID-19 vaccination. Vaccines used in America (Pfizer, Moderna, Janssen, Novavax) have been demonstrated to cause myocarditis as published in the peer-reviewed literature.”

Autopsies of vaccinated patients have found clear evidence of strong expression of spike protein in heart muscle that, according to Dr. Michael Palmer and Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, “correlates with significant inflammation and tissue destruction”.


  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

EXCLUSIVE: Face masks may raise risk of stillbirths, testicular dysfunction and cognitive decline due to build-up of carbon dioxide, study warns

By Caitlin Tilley, Health Reporter For Dailymail.Com

Updated: 01:58 BST, 23 April 2023

Face masks may raise the risk of stillbirths, testicular dysfunction and cognitive decline in children, 'explosive' new research suggests.

A review of dozens of studies on face coverings suggested they can cause mild carbon dioxide poisoning when worn over long periods.

The German academics who carried out the research believe masks create a pocket of dead space between the mouth and mask, which traps the toxic gas.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

After Three Disastrous Years, the NHS Covid App Has Finally Been Put Out of its Misery

The NHS Covid App, which has been put out of its misery at the age of three, was an example of the Government thinking that technology is the answer to every problem, only to then waste billions on an IT project that doesn’t work.

The idea was simple. If at least 50% of the U.K. population would install an app on their phones, it could use Bluetooth to detect proximity of its users and alert them if they had been close to someone who later tested positive for COVID-19. What could possibly go wrong?

An NHSX development team was assembled in March 2020 and it only took two months for it to show all the signs of a typical government IT project. It started with huge publicity in the press and broadcast media and progressed to the inevitable pilot scheme (on the Isle of Wight) quickly followed by Matt Hancock having to backpedal on the rollout date. Heads rolled at NHSX with managers Matthew Gould and Geraint Lewis ‘stepping back’, former Ocado and Apple executive Simon Thompson being drafted in, and development transferred to the Switzerland-based Zühlke Group. Personnel was only one of its problems. It had a centralised design which raised security concerns and led to a public letter of concern from security experts. More damning was the problem that it could not access Bluetooth with the screen locked. Solving that problem would mean doing things the way Apple and Google wanted them done and that ruled out a centralised design. So, by the end of June the app had been scrapped and Lord Bethell could only say that the release would be some time “in the winter”. Under intense media pressure the app was redesigned according to Apple and Google’s specifications and by September 24th it was ready for launch.

With wild claims such as “for every one to two people who download the app, an infection could be prevented” it enjoyed six million downloads on its first day with the app second only to Zoom in U.K. app stores. Even if you didn’t want it on your phone, it became hard to avoid with scanners in shops, pubs and restaurants becoming part of all our lives. Was venue check-in effective? As I pointed out at the time in Lockdown Sceptics, despite millions of check-ins in thousands of venues, only four had been flagged as risky by the end of October 2020. But never mind the data, NHSX claimed that venue QR codes “will help avoid the reintroduction of lockdown measures and support the country to return to a normal way of life”. Two further national lockdowns followed.

Not living up to politicians’ propaganda is one thing; doing serious damage to the economy is another. By July 2021, a combination of mass adoption of the app and relaxation of social distancing following ‘Freedom Day’ led to what became known as the pingdemic. So many people were isolating that trains were cancelled through lack of staff and there were food shortages in supermarkets. Even the Prime Minister had to take time out. The Chief Executive of M&S said the chain had “a major issue” and the Managing Director of Iceland said: “We are in the unprecedented position of having to close stores due to staff absences – not because of COVID-19, but because of a broken and disruptive Track and Trace app.”

Despite causing economic and social carnage the app was not disabled or withdrawn. Like so many other policies rolled out during the pandemic, it was a simplistic idea that the Government went all-in on and then could not abandon despite all the evidence against. April 27th 2023 will be its last day, but will anyone mourn its passing?

The author is a tech wizard who would prefer to remain anonymous. He has written many anonymous articles for this site.


  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

WHO is forging ahead with plans to implement a Global Digital Health Certificate

The proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations (“IHR”) are a completely different set of proposals to the “Pandemic Treaty” that will not need to be signed by any President or Prime Minister, nor would the proposed amendments require the advice and consent of the Senate or Parliament.

Amendments to the IHR were adopted in 2022 without Senate/Parliament confirmation. The amendments that are currently being proposed could easily be adopted in the same manner in either May 2023 or 2024.

Among the 307 amendments to the IHR proposed by 94 member nations of the World Health Organisation (“WHO”) are several that would seek to implement a Global Digital Health Certificate.

The World Health Assembly (“WHA”) meets from 21 to 30 May 2023. In preparation for this meeting, they have been uploading documents.  These documents include a progress report referred to as ‘Report O’.  This report states that they going to implement a Global Digital Health certification network.

30. The Secretariat has also been exploring options for the digitalisation of the International Certificate for Vaccination or Prophylaxis, particularly in the context of the measures implemented in relation to covid-19 pandemic, and will continue to explore options for interoperability platforms for the verification of validity of such digital certificates. As referred to in document A76/37 (Report O), WHO is working with partners to establish a Global Digital Health Certification Network, which is intended to enable Member States to verify the authenticity of vaccination certificates issued under International Health Regulations (2005), as well as other health documents. [Emphasis our own.]

Implementation of the International Health Regulations (2005), World Health Organisation, 21 April 2023, page 7

“They say, ‘Oh well, it’s on a voluntary basis’.  [But] what they’ve been doing is building the infrastructure – if you could imagine the infrastructure needed to be able to track and trace everybody on the planet, it’s a large systems task,” James Roguski told Steve Bannon’s War Room. “Building these systems – it takes time, it takes money.” This perhaps is an indication they don’t really intend for it to be “voluntary” for long. 


  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Macnamara said:

if you could imagine the infrastructure needed to be able to track and trace everybody on the planet


The European Union are running a scheme named "INSPIRE" to spatially track almost everything, including humans. It could have relevance...



Quote from their policy;

"Geophysical data on meteorology, geology, soils, etc. is also relevant in the environment policy context, as well as socio-economic data, such as population density or data on human health and safety."

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Proof that the Vaccines Were a Military-Backed Countermeasure

By Sasha Latypova   May 3, 2023

Here is a high-level review of the manufacturing contracts between US DOD and Moderna. 

Moderna’s injection, mRNA-1273 is co-owned with the US Government, as the company has been funded by the defense research grants for years and also received intellectual property transfers from the US Government, in addition to preclinical and clinical research work conducted for Moderna by the NIH Vaccine Research Center. The NIH and Moderna each have a separate Investigational New Drug number for this product.

Moderna entered 2 types of contracts with the US Government for Spikevax injection:

  • “Vaccine” contract and amendments that specifies R&D projects that the US Government ordered and paid for. Note that in Pfizer’s case no R&D activities were ordered or paid for by the US Government, as these were excluded from the scope of the contract.
  • “Manufacturing” contract(s) that ordered a large-scale manufacturing. This is different from Pfizer manufacturing contracts as the words “demonstration” and “prototype” are not used. I believe this is because OTA contracts must be for prototypes but FAR contracting doesn’t have to be.

Note on redactions. In both Moderna and Pfizer’s contracts many areas are redacted indicating a reason for redaction – the “redaction codes.” Redacted content has been given codes b (4) and b (6), standing for:

(b) (4) Disclosure of information that would affect the application of advanced technology in a U.S. weapons system,


(b) (6) Disclosure of information, including information of foreign governments, that would cause serious harm to relations between the United States and a foreign government or to ongoing diplomatic activities of the United States.

There are several versions of the contract available, plus amendments. The first version was signed on August 9, 2020 and the last available version is June 15, 2021. In one of them the name of the signatory on the Moderna side was redacted with (b)(6). In another version it’s unredacted – it was Hamilton Bennett, a senior director of vaccine access and partnerships. 

This 35-year-old woman seems woefully underqualified, especially to “engineer the vaccine” as her role was described in the press. Moderna’s history is notable for high-profile departures of competent and experienced people. Based on press reports and accounts of insiders, Stephan Bancel’s toxic management culture led to departures of many qualified scientists including heads of R&D, Oncology, Cardiovascular, Chemistry, Rare Diseases, and even Vaccines (right around the time the company pivoted to vaccines in 2016).  Terminal incompetence is a prerequisite for terminal fraud. 

Unlike Pfizer’s and other covid countermeasures contracts, the Moderna contract is not under Other Transactions Authority (OTA) but FAR 43.103(a)(3) and “Mutual Agreement of the Parties.” This makes little difference with regard to the product liability and generally ignores pharmaceutical regulations, as described below. 

The total initial amount of contract was $1.5 billion, and this was increased to exactly $8,145,591,662.60 in later amendments. Sixty cents – the criminals get points for style and attention to detail! Note that this is in addition to the $1 billion R&D contract for a handful of studies that didn’t matter which I discussed in Part 1. 

The scope of the contract is “manufacturing of up to 500M doses”

The Department of Defense and Health and Human Services (HHS) require large-scale manufacturing of vaccine doses in support of the national emergency response to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) for the United States Government (USG) and the US population. 

Note this is for “manufacturing” and not demonstration or prototype.

The Objectives

This gets interesting. This paragraph includes feel-good sounding words which cover up the true intent: to declare an unrestricted bio-chemical-radiological and nuclear war on Americans, subvert consumer protections under the pretense of a “pandemic response.” Note the words “whole of nation effort:”


“Whole of nation” language can refer to the mobilization of a nation at the time of war. In that use, it is for an obvious declared war with a defined external enemy. However, in the new era of unrestricted 5th generation warfare this language seems to be being used to signal an overt takeover of the entire country by a rogue militarized force, typically by pretense of some sort of a manufactured crisis, and typically from the inside. 

I found numerous references to this terminology in the press going back several years, in the US related to military things like cyber warfare, but also in the Chinese, Singaporean, and Australian press. One very interesting and thorough explanation of the “Whole of Nation Chimera” in a Philippine source describing the use of this approach by the militarized government regime that took over all government branches, and the entire civil society. In other words, it describes the installation of a fascist/totalitarian structure. I highly recommend readers to visit the link to the Philippine story published in March 2019 above, because remarkably, the language used is extremely similar to the US government pronouncements related to “covid pandemic response” and Operation Warp Speed. Did the US government writers plagiarize Duerte or do the globo-mafia captured cartels signal to each other and their superiors this way? 

“Whole of nation” is closely associated with “whole of government” terminology. Both presented as feel-good ideas in plain text, but in fact these words signal a usurpation of power by the militarized executive branch of the government. Public-private partnerships – so beloved by sellouts in academia, pharma, medicine and defense – are another closely associated term. 

PL 115-92 refers to Public Law and is discussed below. It’s a way to subvert FDA regulations by conscripting it to serve the DOD goals through the mentioned Interagency Agreement. They now have to follow the DOD orders and fake-approve the unapprovable on command and on schedule. 

Finally, it is clear that the clinical trials are absolutely irrelevant to the approval of the injections by the FDA, as the large-scale manufacturing of these substances does not depend on them. It is performed in parallel with these fake exercises intended to fool the public. 

Compliance with pharmaceutical regulations and Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP)

The contract cites cGMP laws. However it is in a section “Applicable Documents” – referring to this as a document, not a law. 


And further, in Amendment 1 the contract states: “cGMP manufacturing of 100 million doses, subject to any exceptions established by or the enforcement discretion of the FDA.” Therefore, if FDA decides that no cGMP is necessary, then it’s not necessary. 

Product variations and undisclosed items ordered

The PO contains numerous items other than the mRNA-1273 (Spikevax) vaccine, and all of them are completely redacted with (b)(4)-i.e. “Reveal information that would impair the application of state-of-the-art technology within a U.S. weapon system.”

In one of the amendments, the following clause was added:  H.19 Product Variations (Authority FAR 43.103(a)(3), Mutual Agreement of the Parties), and completely redacted with the “weapons” redaction, including the word “Variations.” This may refer to varying toxicity of different batches, but that’s just a guess on my part:


Public Law PL 115-92

Under “Regulatory” the only thing that’s defined is that Moderna is the sponsor of the product, IND and BLA. Then it says that the DOD will use this law for the product: “DoD Medical Product Priority. PL 115-92 allows the DoD to request, and FDA to provide, assistance to expedite development of products to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions facing American military personnel. The contractor recognizes that only the DoD can utilize PL 115-92.”

Clearly, the US military invokes pub law 115-92 (ostensibly a measure to fast track countermeasures against military attacks, but which in practice is the DoD directing med regulators [FDA]) in their multi-billion contract w/Pfizer to produce a biowepon.

Here’s the relevant text of the law, which quite directly subverts the FDA and it’s function in service of DOD ends. Highly problematic to say the least, particularly when applied (as was the case w/covid) beyond the laws remit (i.e., defending military personnel from attacks), but instead used to push secret, dual-use technologies, without proper consumer testing and safeguards on unsuspecting civilian population. Screenshot of the law was provided by a reader:


The PREP Act clause

This clause declares the contractor free of liability and also describes the items and technology as both civil and military applications, i.e. weapons:


Defense priority rating

The defense priority rating was added by amendment on September 11, 2020. Add a Health Resources Priorities and Allocations System (HRPAS) priority rating of DO-HR to this contract. Add a Defense Priorities and Allocation System (DPAS) priority rating of DO-C9 to this contract to act as the equivalent to the HRPAS priority rating of DO-HR. Add FAR 52.211-15, Defense Priority and Allocation Requirements This is a rated order certified for national defense, emergency preparedness, and energy program use, and the Contractor shall follow all the requirements of the Defense Priorities and Allocations System regulation (15 CFR 700).

Rated order memo in attachment signed by General Perna COO of OWS:


Republished from the author’s Substack


  • Sasha Latypova

    Sasha Latypova is a former pharmaceutical R&D executive. She worked in the industry for 25 years, and ultimately owned and managed several contract research organizations working on clinical trials for 60+pharma companies, including Pfizer, AstraZeneca, J&J, GSK, Novartis and many others. She worked many years in cardiovascular safety assessments and interacted with the FDA and other regulatory agencies on these matters on behalf of her clients and as part of the FDA Cardiovascular Safety Research Consortium.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Beware: The Covid Inquiry is an Attack on Democracy

by J Sorel
The Covid Inquiry, then, is not an empirical exercise – but a political one; perhaps even a therapeutic one. It hopes to rebrand lockdown as a noble cause, led astray by guilty men. In this way it seeks to revive the moral case for restrictions, and, still more, the moral case for the civil service. In the end, it is not a chance for catharsis, but a classic case of power petitioning itself.
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Covid mRNA Vaccine and Pregnancy: Leading to Miscarriage or Stillbirth!

Fetal Cardiac Arrests, Fetal Pulmonary Hemorrhage, Placental Clots, Placental Failure

Global Research, June 16, 2023

Pregnant women who took toxic, experimental COVID-19 mRNA vaccines have been suffering all kinds of complications including:

  • miscarriages (fetal death <= 20wk)
  • stillbirths (fetal death > 20wk)
  • sudden death of mom before, during or after delivery (click here)
  • pregnant women having heart attacks, strokes, dying in sleep (click here)
  • sudden deaths of infants shortly after delivery (click here)
  • injuries to infants such as myocarditis (click here)
  • injuries to infants from breastfeeding with mRNA in milk (click here)

In this article I will look deeper into some of the identified causes of miscarriages and stillbirths (after mom took COVID-19 mRNA vaccine) such as fetal growth restriction, fetal cardiac arrest, fetal pulmonary hemorrhage, blood clots at the placenta, placental failure, etc.

I will write a separate substack on congenital malformations.

I would like to thank Substack author “WelcomeTheEagle88” for his work on finding these VAERS reports, please check out his substack, he has done some incredible work (click here).


Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
June 28, 2023 

Very Bad News for Super-Vaccinated People: Study | Facts Matter

click on link below to see the video clip explaining the content of this post:

A new, recently published study found that the more COVID-19 shots a person received, the more weakened their immune system becomes. The researchers laid out within the study the mechanism by how this happens, which has to do with the spike in production of IgG4 anti-bodies within the vaccine recipient’s body.

A new body of research has recently discovered that these IgG4 anti-bodies are not benign, but can lead to a plethora of problems for the human body, including cancer, organ dysfunction, organ failure, and even death.

The technical name for this is IgG4-Related Disease.

Episode Resources:

🔵 Main Study:


🔵 Dr. Andrew Lee Lecture:


🔵 IgG4 Related Disease:






🔵 Negative Efficacy Studies:





Edited by Macnamara
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

White House Banned From Meeting Social Media Executives After “Massive” Effort to Censor Covid Jab Dissent

Joe Biden’s officials have been temporarily banned from meeting with social media company executives due to what the judge agreed appeared to be a “massive” effort to censor dissent on Covid vaccines. The Telegraph has more.

A judge backed claims that the U.S. President’s administration, including the White House, had engaged in a “massive” attempt to stop Americans questioning the efficacy of vaccines online.

The injunction came after it was revealed last month that U.K. ministers set up a Counter-Disinformation Unit, which was used to target lockdown critics and those questioning the mass vaccination of children.

The U.K. Government used an artificial intelligence firm to monitor social media sites and flag opposition to vaccine passports.

Prosecutors in the Republican states of Louisiana and Missouri brought the case and accused the federal Government of being involved in a “censorship enterprise“.

They claimed that the Biden administration violated the First Amendment by trying to block social media users exercising their right to free speech.

Thousands of communications between Government officials and technology companies during the pandemic have been collected and presented in the court case, which is known as Missouri v. Biden.

Judge Terry Doughty, who was appointed during the Donald Trump administration, issued an injunction which stops Mr. Biden’s officials talking to social media companies about “protected speech”.

In his ruling, the judge banned Government departments from contacting social media companies for “the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression or reduction of content containing protected free speech”.

A final ruling in the case has yet to be made by the judge.

In the injunction, he said that the Attorneys General from Louisiana and Missouri had “produced evidence of a massive effort by defendants, from the White House to federal agencies, to suppress speech based on its content”.


  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...